Re: [opensuse] [EMAIL PROTECTED], first problems :s

2007-10-11 Thread Michael Letourneau
Ciro Iriarte wrote:
 Hi,

   Just installed [EMAIL PROTECTED] (changing from [EMAIL PROTECTED]), 
 found some
 issues and would like to comment them to see if someone else did it
 too.

 * VMware Server
 Got this error trying to run the vmware-server-console:

 mainwks:~ vmware-server-console
 /usr/lib/vmware-server-console/bin/vmware-server-console:
 /usr/lib/vmware-server-console/lib/libpng12.so.0/libpng12.so.0: no
 version information available (required by /usr/lib/libcairo.so.2)

 [snip]
 Regards,
 Ciro
 N�r��y隊Z)z{.�ﮞ˛���m�)z{.��+�Z+i�b�*'jW(�f�vǦj)h���Ǿ��i�org=

I am also using 10.3 x86_64 and am having no issues with
vmware-server-console.  I went with the KDE desktop, and am using 1.0.4
of vmware-server-console, if that helps.

Michael
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[opensuse] [EMAIL PROTECTED], first problems :s

2007-10-10 Thread Ciro Iriarte
Hi,

Just installed [EMAIL PROTECTED] (changing from [EMAIL PROTECTED]), 
found some
issues and would like to comment them to see if someone else did it
too.

* VMware Server
Got this error trying to run the vmware-server-console:

mainwks:~ vmware-server-console
/usr/lib/vmware-server-console/bin/vmware-server-console:
/usr/lib/vmware-server-console/lib/libpng12.so.0/libpng12.so.0: no
version information available (required by /usr/lib/libcairo.so.2)

Found some posts telling that i should replace the included libraries
in vmware with links to the system libs, so replaced
/usr/lib/vmware-server-console/lib/libpng12.so.0/libpng12.so.0 with
a link  to /usr/lib/libpng12.so.0, the error desapeared but it
didn't launch the console either

* Wine
Trying to run ANY program gives me a Segment violation

mainwks:~ wine /datos/software/GPS/iBlueToolsv2.4build102/setup.exe
Violación de segmento
mainwks:~ rpm -q wine
wine-0.9.44-15

Tried upgrading to wine-0.9.46-12.3 on the buildservice but that
didn't change it..

* Firefox
In realeases before 10.3 the 32bit firefox was installed instead the
64bit, now it's not the case. So, trying to stay with the new standard
run the nsplugin app and got this:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ nspluginscan
KCrash: Application 'nspluginscan' crashing...
KCrash: Application 'nspluginscan' crashing...
KCrash cannot reach kdeinit, launching directly.
KCrash cannot reach kdeinit, launching directly.
KCrash: Application 'nspluginscan' crashing...
KCrash cannot reach kdeinit, launching directly.
KCrash: Application 'nspluginscan' crashing...
KCrash cannot reach kdeinit, launching directly.
KCrash: Application 'nspluginscan' crashing...
KCrash cannot reach kdeinit, launching directly.

With a graphical popup (well, really 5 of them) indicating that the app crashed

* Google Earth

Tryied to install Google Earth version 4.2 without luck:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ sux -
Contraseña:
mainwks:~ # sh /datos/software/GoogleEarthLinux_v4.2.0181.2634.bin
Verifying archive integrity... All good.
Uncompressing Google Earth for GNU/Linux
4.2.198.2451..

(setup.gtk2:2324): GModule-CRITICAL **: g_module_symbol: assertion
`module != NULL' failed

(setup.gtk2:2324): GModule-CRITICAL **: g_module_symbol: assertion
`module != NULL' failed

(setup.gtk2:2324): GModule-CRITICAL **: g_module_symbol: assertion
`module != NULL' failed

(setup.gtk2:2324): GModule-CRITICAL **: g_module_symbol: assertion
`module != NULL' failed

(setup.gtk2:2324): GModule-CRITICAL **: g_module_symbol: assertion
`module != NULL' failed

(setup.gtk2:2324): GModule-CRITICAL **: g_module_symbol: assertion
`module != NULL' failed

(setup.gtk2:2324): GModule-CRITICAL **: g_module_symbol: assertion
`module != NULL' failed

(setup.gtk2:2324): GModule-CRITICAL **: g_module_symbol: assertion
`module != NULL' failed

(setup.gtk2:2324): GModule-CRITICAL **: g_module_symbol: assertion
`module != NULL' failed

(setup.gtk2:2324): GModule-CRITICAL **: g_module_symbol: assertion
`module != NULL' failed

(setup.gtk2:2324): GModule-CRITICAL **: g_module_symbol: assertion
`module != NULL' failed

(setup.gtk2:2324): GModule-CRITICAL **: g_module_symbol: assertion
`module != NULL' failed

(setup.gtk2:2324): GModule-CRITICAL **: g_module_symbol: assertion
`module != NULL' failed

(setup.gtk2:2324): GModule-CRITICAL **: g_module_symbol: assertion
`module != NULL' failed

(setup.gtk2:2324): GModule-CRITICAL **: g_module_symbol: assertion
`module != NULL' failed

(setup.gtk2:2324): GModule-CRITICAL **: g_module_symbol: assertion
`module != NULL' failed

(setup.gtk2:2324): GModule-CRITICAL **: g_module_symbol: assertion
`module != NULL' failed

(setup.gtk2:2324): GModule-CRITICAL **: g_module_symbol: assertion
`module != NULL' failed
./setup.sh: line 158:  2324 Segmentation fault  $setup $@

Anyone found this issues?

Regards,
Ciro


[opensuse] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: gpg inline signed sig incorrect]

2007-06-10 Thread Patrick Shanahan

this is what I got from the mutt-users list

- Forwarded message from Breen Mullins [EMAIL PROTECTED] -

 Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 07:19:44 -0700
 From: Breen Mullins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: gpg inline signed sig incorrect
 
 * Rocco Rutte [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-06-10 13:17 +]:
 
 Hi,
 
 * Patrick Shanahan [07-06-10 07:44:38 -0400] wrote:
 
 Why is the dashdashspace signature indicator not display
 properly in inline gpg signed posts, ie:
 dashspacedashdashspace.
 
 This is so that no software deletes the mail's signature including the
 gpg signature even by accident. I don't know if it's the official
 reason but at least it makes sense... :)
 
 It's required by RFC2440 (the OpenPGP standard). See section 7.1
 therein.
 
 Breen
 -- 
 Breen Mullins
 Menlo Park, California

- End forwarded message -

-- 
Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USAHOG # US1244711
http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album:  http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2
Registered Linux User #207535@ http://counter.li.org
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2006-06-09 Thread Thomas Hertweck
I re-arranged the order of the quotes:

Rajko M wrote:
 [...]
 Users logic to select plain opensuse list is clear to me. If one looks 
 for Fedora help subscribes to fedora not redhat mailing list. The 
 problem is that we insist on naming openSUSE for community, and SUSE 
 Linux for distribution. Fedora has not that problem.

I think you're right.

 [...] I don't see anything wrong to leave opensuse for
 the broadest range of topics, from technical to social, and create as 
 you proposed opensuse-project for discussion about project.
 It is easier to move few of us than the whole world.

 Demand to close the list is irrational, effectively you lock the door 
 that most people will try to knock on.

I also agree with this statement. I think we should keep this list and,
if there is a requirement for a new/separate one, we should move the
project-related part to the other list. This sound more feasible. The
name should then be obvious ;-) But I am not sure whether we really need
a separate list at this moment in time.

 [...]
 How to solve SUSE naming is up to Novell. Official it is SUSE Linux,on
 FTP in opensuse directory is SL-10.0-OSS, than SL-10.1, than
 SL-OSS-factory, and there is unofficial shortcut openSUSE (Linux).

Any updates from the official side? At the end of the day, Novell must
decide about the mailing lists on Novell's mail server.

Cheers,
Th.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2006-06-09 Thread Rajko M

Thomas Hertweck wrote:

I re-arranged the order of the quotes:

Rajko M wrote:

[...]
Users logic to select plain opensuse list is clear to me. If one looks 
for Fedora help subscribes to fedora not redhat mailing list. The 
problem is that we insist on naming openSUSE for community, and SUSE 
Linux for distribution. Fedora has not that problem.


I think you're right.


[...] I don't see anything wrong to leave opensuse for
the broadest range of topics, from technical to social, and create as 
you proposed opensuse-project for discussion about project.

It is easier to move few of us than the whole world.

Demand to close the list is irrational, effectively you lock the door 
that most people will try to knock on.


I also agree with this statement. I think we should keep this list and,
if there is a requirement for a new/separate one, we should move the
project-related part to the other list. This sound more feasible. The
name should then be obvious ;-) But I am not sure whether we really need
a separate list at this moment in time.


[...]
How to solve SUSE naming is up to Novell. Official it is SUSE Linux,on
FTP in opensuse directory is SL-10.0-OSS, than SL-10.1, than
SL-OSS-factory, and there is unofficial shortcut openSUSE (Linux).


Any updates from the official side? At the end of the day, Novell must
decide about the mailing lists on Novell's mail server.

Cheers,
Th.



Thanks Thomas,

I agree that real need for separate list doesn't exist right now, but if 
someone wants one it is easy to make it. Well, if Henne has time to read 
this new list might be under way :-) The idea with opensuse-project 
seems the most appropriate for technical and social stuff related to the 
openSUSE project.


--
Regards,
Rajko.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] [EMAIL PROTECTED] = opensuse-help gets my vote

2006-06-08 Thread scsijon

At 11:07 AM 6/06/2006, you wrote:

Martin Schlander wrote:
 snipHenne's proposal is
 good - but we should learn from our mistakes and enhance it a little bit.

 opensuse-users@ - opensuse-help


maybe this would be better if it was - opensuse-helpusers

so people know it's help for users and not help for the opensuse 
mailing system?


Oh, yes, and I think the base list should still exist, but only as a 
autoreply explaining

the different lists and what they are for.


scsijon  



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2006-06-07 Thread Boyd Lynn Gerber
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

 Martin Schlander wrote:
  Tirsdag 06 juni 2006 02:26 skrev Rajko M:
   It was just list of words that will make lesser confusion, and in the
   mean time I backed up proposal by Martin Schlander,
  
   Move function of - to:
   opensuse-users@ - opensuse-help
   opensuse@ - opensuse-project
 
  I've been thinking some more about this. I don't think we should support
  the misconception that opensuse is a distro, how about:
 
  opensuse-users@ - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Users logic to select plain opensuse list is clear to me. If one looks for
 Fedora help subscribes to fedora not redhat mailing list. The problem is
 that we insist on naming openSUSE for community, and SUSE Linux for
 distribution. Fedora has not that problem.

 How to solve SUSE naming is up to Novell. Official it is SUSE Linux, on FTP in
 opensuse directory is SL-10.0-OSS, than SL-10.1, than SL-OSS-factory, and
 there is unofficial shortcut openSUSE (Linux).

 As someone mentioned opensuse-help  will confuse experienced mail list users,
 so we have to give up on that. Probably opensuse-support will win the race,
 but most new users follow common logic that product found in opensuse
 directory, that links from opensuse.org, should be supported on opensuse
 mailing list. I don't see anything wrong to leave opensuse for the broadest
 range of topics, from technical to social, and create as you proposed
 opensuse-project for discussion about project.
 It is easier to move few of us than the whole world.

What about opensuse-assist or opensuse-assistance for the user questions?

- --
Boyd Gerber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ZENEZ   1042 East Fort Union #135, Midvale Utah  84047
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/

iD8DBQFEhvbAVtBjDid73eYRAv27AJ0aOCK5Op7q0YJxcLJLMYDqoySWdgCfQWOT
JBsI22+XT7HX2k7QZzN0Ln0=
=skKI
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2006-06-07 Thread Rajko M

Boyd Lynn Gerber wrote:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1


Martin Schlander wrote:

Tirsdag 06 juni 2006 02:26 skrev Rajko M:

It was just list of words that will make lesser confusion, and in the
mean time I backed up proposal by Martin Schlander,

Move function of - to:
opensuse-users@ - opensuse-help
opensuse@ - opensuse-project

I've been thinking some more about this. I don't think we should support
the misconception that opensuse is a distro, how about:

opensuse-users@ - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Users logic to select plain opensuse list is clear to me. If one looks for
Fedora help subscribes to fedora not redhat mailing list. The problem is
that we insist on naming openSUSE for community, and SUSE Linux for
distribution. Fedora has not that problem.

How to solve SUSE naming is up to Novell. Official it is SUSE Linux, on FTP in
opensuse directory is SL-10.0-OSS, than SL-10.1, than SL-OSS-factory, and
there is unofficial shortcut openSUSE (Linux).

As someone mentioned opensuse-help  will confuse experienced mail list users,
so we have to give up on that. Probably opensuse-support will win the race,
but most new users follow common logic that product found in opensuse
directory, that links from opensuse.org, should be supported on opensuse
mailing list. I don't see anything wrong to leave opensuse for the broadest
range of topics, from technical to social, and create as you proposed
opensuse-project for discussion about project.
It is easier to move few of us than the whole world.


What about opensuse-assist or opensuse-assistance for the user questions?

- --
Boyd Gerber [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Hi Boyd,

it is possible, but as explained, we need one group with broadest 
allowed topics. The opensuse-assistance is fine, but, still, it has 
limit defined by suffix.


Why not simple opensuse with definition that here can be asked any 
question that has something to do with openSUSE and SUSE Linux. That 
will be the list to give simple advices and if that fails, advisory 
where to go for more information.


For the rest of us can be arranged specialized list as opensuse-project.
It is easier to move few experienced users, than to demand from whole a 
lot more first time users to know what is exact place where they should go.


If they would know, then they would go directly not over opensuse, but 
if they would know, than they would not be first time users.


--
Regards,
Rajko.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2006-06-06 Thread jdd

houghi wrote:

On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 12:33:15AM +0200, Martin Schlander wrote:


opensuse-users@ - opensuse-help

opensuse@ - opensuse-project

Who's gonna misunderstand that?



Great ideas.


And then kill [EMAIL PROTECTED] There shouldn't be a plain opensuse@ - too confusing 
for people to figure out which aspects of opensuse belong on there - a lot of 
people like snip



Leave it as a honey trap. :-) People still unwilling or unable to
understand can use it as their playground. A bit like these castles you
have outside hamburger places. (Also for the same purpose. :-)

houghi
the better way to see what happen is to make it (in your 
mind) read only. _do not_ post on this list and look at what 
happen...


jdd

--
http://www.dodin.net
http://dodin.org/galerie_photo_web/expo/index.html
http://lucien.dodin.net
http://fr.susewiki.org/index.php?title=Gérer_ses_photos

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2006-06-06 Thread Siegbert Baude
Martin Schlander schrieb:

 opensuse-users@ - opensuse-help
 
 opensuse@ - opensuse-project
 
 Who's gonna misunderstand that?

I second that. Except these two names, I also liked the layout of
Henne's proposal with regard to the topic and language specifics.

 And then kill [EMAIL PROTECTED] There shouldn't be a plain opensuse@ - too 
 confusing 
 for people to figure out which aspects of opensuse belong on there

If I think about Henne's complete proposal once again, for me the
problem seems to be, to have exactly one schema both for low- and
high-traffic lists.
- For low traffic ones, Henne's layout perfectly fits, as everything can
go to project@ as a catch-all and only if there is need, more specific
subtopics are arranged.
- For high traffic ones however, subtopics are a must-have and then the
question remains, what will be on topic in the unspecific project@ list.
It would be best to not have it at all, but this breaks the unique schema.

So my proposal for high traffic lists is to have project@, but just send
an automatic answer that lists the topics of this project and the
relevant mailing list names. project-help@ as the standard sink for all
I-don't-know-where-to-ask-mails seems to be o.k.

With regard to Martin's suggestion about killing opensuse: As the
existence of opensuse@ is already spread over many sites, it would not
be good to just kill it. So, introduce the new name schema, adapt the
communication page at opensuse.org and send an automatic answer with
the new layout and a pointer to the communication page as answer to
every mail for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In this way nobody thinks, that the mailing lists are not working any
more and in the same time gets the pointers, which hopefully take away
some work off Houghi on this list, and -help and -project should also
satisfy Randalf's need for good English. ;-)

Henne, would this be o.k. for you?

Ciao
Siegbert

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2006-06-06 Thread Martin Schlander
Tirsdag 06 juni 2006 02:26 skrev Rajko M:
 It was just list of words that will make lesser confusion, and in the
 mean time I backed up proposal by Martin Schlander,

 Move function of - to:
 opensuse-users@ - opensuse-help
 opensuse@ - opensuse-project

 with addition to keep bare opensuse for newbies, as it seems they like
 it :-)

I've been thinking some more about this. I don't think we should support the 
misconception that opensuse is a distro, how about:

opensuse-users@ - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Martin / cb400f

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2006-06-06 Thread Randall R Schulz
On Monday 05 June 2006 22:28, houghi wrote:
 ...

 You know what? You are right and I have my peace. So whatever.
 plonk

Thank you.


 houghi


RRS

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2006-06-06 Thread Randall R Schulz
On Tuesday 06 June 2006 00:01, Peter Flodin wrote:
 On 6/6/06, Randall R Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I certainly do. A community is _people_ not _projects_. You are
  _not_ discussing _the community_, you're discussing _the work_. No
  matter how many times you repeat it, you're not going to change
  English to suit your misunderstanding.

 I think that Randall is technically correct, even though his tone at
 times can sound on the aggressive side, whether it is intentional or
 not.

 We all think we know what 'community' means, but we do use the term
 where the word 'project' would be much more suitable.

 'Community' _is_ a set of people, this is a definition of the word in
 English. The openSUSE community is the set of people involved in the
 openSUSE project.

 Therefore, examine your own use of the word 'community' and see if
 you really mean 'project'. Houghi's signature in my view is currently
 wrong, and should state project rather than community. The words are
 not synonymous.

 Peter 'Pflodo' Flodin


Thank you.


RRS

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2006-06-06 Thread jdd

Martin Schlander wrote:

Tirsdag 06 juni 2006 02:26 skrev Rajko M:


It was just list of words that will make lesser confusion, and in the
mean time I backed up proposal by Martin Schlander,

Move function of - to:
opensuse-users@ - opensuse-help
opensuse@ - opensuse-project

with addition to keep bare opensuse for newbies, as it seems they like
it :-)



I've been thinking some more about this. I don't think we should support the 
misconception that opensuse is a distro, how about:


opensuse-users@ - [EMAIL PROTECTED]


no matter to change anything so...

SUSE Linux is a distro, but a distro don't give any help... 
it's the communtiy that gives help, so I vote for an 
opensuse prefix for the mailing-lists.


May I however point out that for some days now there no more 
suse-linux-e at the first place on the communicate page. I 
noted the two problematic lists SUSE linux all questions 
list (for suse-linux-e) and openSUSE community life for 
opensuse. so the name should not be that important.


small (very small) details seems to have a greater 
importance and in this other thread I openned recently (how 
did you know about this list) I receive answers that are not 
at all what I expected, but are very interesting. I will try 
to fix this.


(and this doesn't mean the other modifications are not usefull)

jdd


--
http://www.dodin.net
http://dodin.org/galerie_photo_web/expo/index.html
http://lucien.dodin.net
http://fr.susewiki.org/index.php?title=Gérer_ses_photos

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] [EMAIL PROTECTED] = opensuse-help gets my vote

2006-06-06 Thread Henne Vogelsang
Hi,

On Tuesday, June 06, 2006 at 03:07:51, Kenneth Aar, Grafikern.no wrote:
 Martin Schlander wrote:
  snipHenne's proposal is 
  good - but we should learn from our mistakes and enhance it a little bit.
 
  opensuse-users@ - opensuse-help
 
  opensuse@ - opensuse-project
 
  Who's gonna misunderstand that?
 This is the best suggestion so far.
 
 To get rid of of all confusion we must kill opensuse. - And by that I
 mean the list, and not the other thingy. ;-)

 Henne: I hope you are reading and agree to this. I don't think it's such
 a good idea to first change it to opensuse-technical and then discuss it
 again, a better soulution has presented itself (IMO)... So we owe it to
 ourselves to do it right when we set this plan in motion.

Im not against any idea to change the mailinglist layout we are going to
use. What i need is a layout that scales. Scales over projects and
languages. I proposed such a layout a while ago.

If we exchange names in there (foo-help instead of foo-users or
foo-project as default instead of foo) does not matter too much. From
the technical side this is a no-brainer. I just need an overall layout i
can follow. 

Henne

-- 
Henne Vogelsang, Core Services
Rules change. The Game remains the same.
 - Omar (The Wire)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] [EMAIL PROTECTED] = opensuse-help gets my vote

2006-06-06 Thread jdd

Henne Vogelsang wrote:


If we exchange names in there (foo-help instead of foo-users or
foo-project as default instead of foo) does not matter too much. From
the technical side this is a no-brainer. I just need an overall layout i
can follow. 


the most evident word (internationally accepted) is help. 
So there should be an opensuse-help list. This one will 
probably be used default by most users.


added to the new template (see other thread) that advetise 
only this list (suse-linux-e for the moment, but we may 
change that at will), most post should go there.


and if anybody go there and need an other list, people 
should say it to him.


Henne, sorry to stole the thread, but, I'm fairly sure you 
will read this, and it's for you. Writting the template I 
notice that to unsubscribe, one must look at the headers. 
why not give directly the link in the mail footer? 
advertising that it's easy to unsubscribe may make people join.


jdd


--
http://www.dodin.net
http://dodin.org/galerie_photo_web/expo/index.html
http://lucien.dodin.net
http://fr.susewiki.org/index.php?title=Gérer_ses_photos

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] [EMAIL PROTECTED] = opensuse-help gets my vote

2006-06-06 Thread Thomas Hertweck

jdd wrote:
 [...]
 
 the most evident word (internationally accepted) is help. 
 So there should be an opensuse-help list. 

.From my point of view, this is not such a good idea. For many mailing
lists the address name-help@ is used to automatically send a short
help with instructions on how to use the mailing list software and/or a
short FAQ to a user. For instance, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is such an
address. Thus, IMO there should be no actual list with that name, that's
again misleading (at least for people having some experiences with
mailing lists).

Two additional comments on some related subjects: a) I can understand
Randall's arguments and I think he's technically correct. I won't
comment on the tone of the whole discussion. b) I don't think that
renaming etc. or removing this list will solve all problems. There
should be a list where users can ask all general questions about
openSUSE, whether these questions are about the project or whatever.
Most people with general questions do not subscribe to all the different
mailing lists. This is a fact. In Principle, I can't see a problem with
some technical questions here; the useless discussions, flames, and all
the unnecessary blabla are much more annoying than technical questions.

Cheers,
Th.




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2006-06-06 Thread Rajko M

Martin Schlander wrote:

Tirsdag 06 juni 2006 02:26 skrev Rajko M:

It was just list of words that will make lesser confusion, and in the
mean time I backed up proposal by Martin Schlander,

Move function of - to:
opensuse-users@ - opensuse-help
opensuse@ - opensuse-project

with addition to keep bare opensuse for newbies, as it seems they like
it :-)


I've been thinking some more about this. I don't think we should support the 
misconception that opensuse is a distro, how about:


opensuse-users@ - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Martin / cb400f



I was thinking how came to heated discussion on this topic, and more I 
think, it seems that we have to listen people, not the other way around.


We want:
- new users
- organized way to help them
- no naming confusion

Users logic to select plain opensuse list is clear to me. If one looks 
for Fedora help subscribes to fedora not redhat mailing list. The 
problem is that we insist on naming openSUSE for community, and SUSE 
Linux for distribution. Fedora has not that problem.


How to solve SUSE naming is up to Novell. Official it is SUSE Linux, on 
FTP in opensuse directory is SL-10.0-OSS, than SL-10.1, than 
SL-OSS-factory, and there is unofficial shortcut openSUSE (Linux).


As someone mentioned opensuse-help  will confuse experienced mail list 
users, so we have to give up on that. Probably opensuse-support will win 
the race, but most new users follow common logic that product found in 
opensuse directory, that links from opensuse.org, should be supported on 
opensuse mailing list. I don't see anything wrong to leave opensuse for 
the broadest range of topics, from technical to social, and create as 
you proposed opensuse-project for discussion about project.

It is easier to move few of us than the whole world.

Demand to close the list is irrational, effectively you lock the door 
that most people will try to knock on.


I really don't understand what is wrong to decrease load on suse-linux-e 
(100 mails a day). I don't find amusing to browse trough that amount of 
mails, and newcomers will be even more overhelmed with the number.


We have to leave opensuse list as refuge for them. The chance that they 
will find installation topics of their interest is bigger. People ready 
to help them will have easier task to deal with basic installaton problems.


Complain that someone will miss some interesting article because it is 
in another group is at least funny. Time used to repel inappropriate 
posters from here, could be used to find appropriate article in another 
list, and point new user to exact solution of his/her problem.


BTW, I have to see for some blog place where I can put my rant in :-)

--
Regards,
Rajko.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2006-06-06 Thread houghi
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 10:43:05PM -0500, Rajko M wrote:
snip
 BTW, I have to see for some blog place where I can put my rant in :-)

http://en.opensuse.org/User:Rajko_m
HTH, HAND. ;-)

houghi
-- 
This openSUSE  mailinglist is about the community.  All discussion about
the community is welcome.If you have a techical question
just subscribe  via this email  address: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
post your original email again there, and you will get a straight answer.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[opensuse] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2006-06-05 Thread jdd
could we have an alias (or something similar) between 
suse-linux-e and something like 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


may be part of the problem comes from the name. suse-linux-e 
may be understood, like all the others suse.com lists, as 
Novell specifics or pre-opensuse SUSE Linux distributions 
(up to 9.3)


unifying the names should enhance the system.

jdd
--
http://www.dodin.net
http://dodin.org/galerie_photo_web/expo/index.html
http://lucien.dodin.net
http://fr.susewiki.org/index.php?title=Gérer_ses_photos

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2006-06-05 Thread Richard Bos
Op maandag 5 juni 2006 08:58, schreef jdd:
 could we have an alias (or something similar) between
 suse-linux-e and something like
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 may be part of the problem comes from the name. suse-linux-e
 may be understood, like all the others suse.com lists, as
 Novell specifics or pre-opensuse SUSE Linux distributions
 (up to 9.3)

 unifying the names should enhance the system.

Hmmm,  opensuse-linux-e?

But, as we experience people think that this is the _technical_list.  So, 
let this list grow to be the technical list and as has been proposed before 
create a new list opensuse-community.  Come'n, opensuse is the a techical 
project and as such I (and many others as can be experienced) expect _this_ 
list to be about technical issues.

-- 
Richard Bos
Without a home the journey is endless

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2006-06-05 Thread Pascal Bleser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Richard Bos wrote:
 Op maandag 5 juni 2006 08:58, schreef jdd:
 could we have an alias (or something similar) between
 suse-linux-e and something like
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 may be part of the problem comes from the name. suse-linux-e
 may be understood, like all the others suse.com lists, as
 Novell specifics or pre-opensuse SUSE Linux distributions
 (up to 9.3)

 unifying the names should enhance the system.
 
 Hmmm,  opensuse-linux-e?
 
 But, as we experience people think that this is the _technical_list.  So, 
 let this list grow to be the technical list and as has been proposed before 
 create a new list opensuse-community.  Come'n, opensuse is the a techical 
 project and as such I (and many others as can be experienced) expect _this_ 
 list to be about technical issues.

Sorry, I'm against this... well.. slightly ;D

We shouldn't let go this list as a technical one, but instead migrate
suse-linux-e, or whatever.

But splitting the technical list into suse-linux-e and opensuse won't be
a benefit to anyone.

I'm not against the idea though, move suse-linux-e to
opensuse@opensuse.org and move this list to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

But migrating suse-linux-e is going to be a painful process.

Henne, you had something in your plans/AIs about that, any progress or
plan yet ?

cheers
- --
  -o) Pascal Bleser http://linux01.gwdg.de/~pbleser/
  /\\ [EMAIL PROTECTED]   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 _\_v The more things change, the more they stay insane.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEg+0Ar3NMWliFcXcRAkvgAJ0fjLN8gQxriN6SNzN3Bxpa/tcLzwCgssu4
KhOJYYrRNfM5Nv6Tr/0JOrQ=
=Qus6
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2006-06-05 Thread Adrian Schröter
Am Monday 05 June 2006 08:58 schrieb jdd:
 could we have an alias (or something similar) between
 suse-linux-e and something like
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

hm, -technical would match also on different other topics, where -factory 
or -buildservice might be a better list. 
 What kind of questions would you like to discuss there ? Maybe around the 
project organisation ? 
 Would opensuse-project a better list than ?

 may be part of the problem comes from the name. suse-linux-e
 may be understood, like all the others suse.com lists, as
 Novell specifics or pre-opensuse SUSE Linux distributions
 (up to 9.3)

 unifying the names should enhance the system.

IIRC henne wanted to make suse-linux-e also available under the opensuse 
domain. So we can always announce the new name and fade out the old one. 
Without the need to resubscribe anyone.

bye
adrian

-- 

Adrian Schroeter
SUSE Linux Products GmbH,  Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2006-06-05 Thread Siegbert Baude
Adrian Schröter wrote:
 Am Monday 05 June 2006 08:58 schrieb jdd:
 could we have an alias (or something similar) between
 suse-linux-e and something like
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 hm, -technical would match also on different other topics, where -factory 
 or -buildservice might be a better list. 

Other suggestions:

a) opensuse-help
b) opensuse-helpline
c) opensuse-hotline

Maybe some native speaker should decide which implications each name has
 and then we can choose which one fits bets the purpose of the list.

 IIRC henne wanted to make suse-linux-e also available under the opensuse 
 domain. So we can always announce the new name and fade out the old one. 
 Without the need to resubscribe anyone.

Under which name? The plan for migrating seems to be a good idea, IMHO,
because suse-linux-e is not a name that speaks for itself.

Ciao
Siegbert

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2006-06-05 Thread Henne Vogelsang
Hi,

On Monday, June 05, 2006 at 13:12:27, Siegbert Baude wrote:
 Adrian Schröter wrote:
 
  IIRC henne wanted to make suse-linux-e also available under the opensuse 
  domain. So we can always announce the new name and fade out the old one. 
  Without the need to resubscribe anyone.
 
 Under which name? The plan for migrating seems to be a good idea, IMHO,
 because suse-linux-e is not a name that speaks for itself.

See my mail for the new ml layout

http://lists4.opensuse.org/opensuse/2006-02/msg00382.html

suse-linux-e becomes opensuse-users
suse-linux-s becomes opensuse-users-es
suse-linux becomes opensuse-users-de

I have some time now for the new mailinglist server and im already
working on it since last weekend. 

Henne

-- 
Henne Vogelsang,  http://hennevogel.de
To die. In the rain. Alone.
   Ernest Hemingway

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2006-06-05 Thread jdd

Henne Vogelsang wrote:

Hi,



See my mail for the new ml layout

http://lists4.opensuse.org/opensuse/2006-02/msg00382.html

suse-linux-e becomes opensuse-users
suse-linux-s becomes opensuse-users-es
suse-linux becomes opensuse-users-de

I have some time now for the new mailinglist server and im already
working on it since last weekend. 


this is great (so many things wehre said but not done :-)

thanks a lot
jdd


--
http://www.dodin.net
http://dodin.org/galerie_photo_web/expo/index.html
http://lucien.dodin.net
http://fr.susewiki.org/index.php?title=Gérer_ses_photos

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2006-06-05 Thread Henne Vogelsang
Hi,

On Monday, June 05, 2006 at 17:06:50, houghi wrote:
 On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 02:28:18PM +0200, Henne Vogelsang wrote:
  On Monday, June 05, 2006 at 13:12:27, Siegbert Baude wrote:
   Adrian Schröter wrote:
   
IIRC henne wanted to make suse-linux-e also available under the 
opensuse 
domain. So we can always announce the new name and fade out the old 
one. 
Without the need to resubscribe anyone.
   
   Under which name? The plan for migrating seems to be a good idea, IMHO,
   because suse-linux-e is not a name that speaks for itself.
  
  See my mail for the new ml layout
  
  http://lists4.opensuse.org/opensuse/2006-02/msg00382.html
  
  suse-linux-e becomes opensuse-users
  suse-linux-s becomes opensuse-users-es
  suse-linux becomes opensuse-users-de
  
  I have some time now for the new mailinglist server and im already
  working on it since last weekend. 
 
 This does not explain what will happen to opensuse itself.

Nothing for now. Lets see what will happen once we have -users lists.
Then decide again...

 That is where the problem is.

There is no problem except that suse-* is not hosted on opensuse.org and
therefor not visible in the openSUSE space.. 

 If anything I would say that if there is opensuse-users and opensuse,
 I would have no idea where to ask community questions and where to ask
 technical ones.

I find it pretty obvious.

Henne

-- 
Henne Vogelsang,  http://hennevogel.de
To die. In the rain. Alone.
   Ernest Hemingway

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2006-06-05 Thread houghi
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 06:19:07PM +0200, Henne Vogelsang wrote:
 Nothing for now. Lets see what will happen once we have -users lists.
 Then decide again...

Look at the postings that are being done now and answerd now since hell
broke loose. How many of them do you think are on topic? Exept for this
thread, I don't see one. :-(

  If anything I would say that if there is opensuse-users and opensuse,
  I would have no idea where to ask community questions and where to ask
  technical ones.
 
 I find it pretty obvious.

Me, personally, as well. Many people here unfortunatly don't.

I find it also discouraging that since all hell broke loose, just one
person actually posted an answer AND pointed to the correct group. All you
others either just answerd or did nothing.

For me this means that when the opensuse-users group is here, this group
will already be overgrown with technical questions. This will mean that
you have to find a solution afterwards to merge opensuse-users and
opensuse.

Why then do opensuse-users?

I hope you are also aware that this will minimize the difference between
SUSE Linux and openSUSE even more. People will start talking even more
about openSUSE Linux.

That in itself is not a bad thing and somehow still would be something I
prefere. openSUSE as the past SUSE Linux. SUSE Linux as just in SLES and
SLED. The boxed set would also become openSUSE.

My personal opinion is that such a move would carify a LOT of things that
are unclear now.

houghi
-- 
This openSUSE  mailinglist is about the community.  All discussion about
the community is welcome.If you have a techical question
just subscribe  via this email  address: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
post your original email again there, and you will get a straight answer.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2006-06-05 Thread Martin Schlander
Mandag 05 juni 2006 18:19 skrev Henne Vogelsang:
  If anything I would say that if there is opensuse-users and opensuse,
  I would have no idea where to ask community questions and where to ask
  technical ones.

 I find it pretty obvious.

I'm personally in favour of keeping things as they are and educate and 
redirect people who don't know the difference between openSUSE and SUSE 
Linux - but that's not surprising as I'm a stubborn bastard.

But, if we're going to change things I agree with houghi, Henne's proposal is 
good - but we should learn from our mistakes and enhance it a little bit.

opensuse-users@ - opensuse-help

opensuse@ - opensuse-project

Who's gonna misunderstand that?

And then kill [EMAIL PROTECTED] There shouldn't be a plain opensuse@ - too 
confusing 
for people to figure out which aspects of opensuse belong on there - a lot of 
people like Randall will expect opensuse@ to cover every and any aspect of 
openSUSE as well as SUSE Linux.

Martin / cb400f 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2006-06-05 Thread Martin Schlander
Tirsdag 06 juni 2006 00:54 skrev houghi:
 Great ideas.

Well, actually it was Adrian's and Siegberts idea's respectively. Don't wanna 
take credit.

Martin / cb400f

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2006-06-05 Thread Carl Hartung
On Monday 05 June 2006 18:54, houghi wrote:
  And then kill [EMAIL PROTECTED] There shouldn't be a plain opensuse@ - too
  confusing for people to figure out which aspects of opensuse belong on
  there - a lot of people like snip

 Leave it as a honey trap. :-) People still unwilling or unable to
 understand can use it as their playground. A bit like these castles you
 have outside hamburger places. (Also for the same purpose. :-)

Maybe you could keep it but dump the mail to /dev/null after auto-responding 
with a directory of current SUSE lists, relevant subscription information and 
links pointing to the archives?

Carl

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2006-06-05 Thread Rajko M

Henne Vogelsang wrote:

snip



If anything I would say that if there is opensuse-users and opensuse,
I would have no idea where to ask community questions and where to ask
technical ones.


I find it pretty obvious.

Henne



It doesn't sound obvious to me, Henne.
The opensuse-users tells me that it is place for users, but nothing 
specific what to expect there, place for chat or help and support, or 
both. It will be used just as it is opesuse now, for both.


Few others are lesser vague:
opensuse-help
-support
-installation
-configuration

The fact that users with problems are coming to opensuse tells:
- the clear named place for help around opensuse.org product 
(opensuse-help) is missing
- opensuse is considered as general discussion list and used as 
replacement.


--
Regards,
Rajko.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2006-06-05 Thread Rajko M

Carl Hartung wrote:

On Monday 05 June 2006 18:54, houghi wrote:

And then kill [EMAIL PROTECTED] There shouldn't be a plain opensuse@ - too
confusing for people to figure out which aspects of opensuse belong on
there - a lot of people like snip

Leave it as a honey trap. :-) People still unwilling or unable to
understand can use it as their playground. A bit like these castles you
have outside hamburger places. (Also for the same purpose. :-)


Maybe you could keep it but dump the mail to /dev/null after auto-responding 
with a directory of current SUSE lists, relevant subscription information and 
links pointing to the archives?


Carl


Keep it for people that can't decide where to go.
Newbies will come in general discussion and than get initial help and 
directions to better places for particular topic.


It was long time ago, but I still remember first Linux installation. I 
had no clue where to go, what to ask.


--
Regards,
Rajko.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2006-06-05 Thread Rajko M

Martin Schlander wrote:

Tirsdag 06 juni 2006 00:54 skrev houghi:

Great ideas.


Well, actually it was Adrian's and Siegberts idea's respectively. Don't wanna 
take credit.


Martin / cb400f



Martin, whoever was it, is simple and it will be seldom problem.
I support this.

--
Regards,
Rajko.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2006-06-05 Thread Eberhard Moenkeberg

Hi,

On Mon, 5 Jun 2006, Rajko M wrote:

Carl Hartung wrote:

On Monday 05 June 2006 18:54, houghi wrote:



And then kill [EMAIL PROTECTED] There shouldn't be a plain opensuse@ - too
confusing for people to figure out which aspects of opensuse belong on
there - a lot of people like snip

Leave it as a honey trap. :-) People still unwilling or unable to
understand can use it as their playground. A bit like these castles you
have outside hamburger places. (Also for the same purpose. :-)


Maybe you could keep it but dump the mail to /dev/null after 
auto-responding with a directory of current SUSE lists, relevant 
subscription information and links pointing to the archives?



Keep it for people that can't decide where to go.
Newbies will come in general discussion and than get initial help and 
directions to better places for particular topic.


It was long time ago, but I still remember first Linux installation. I had no 
clue where to go, what to ask.


In any way, we have to go the intuitive way, from the eyes of the 
first-time user. Because you can't educate someone you have never seen, 
spoken or touched.


So I think opensuse (the bare name) must get made ready to process 
postings like it does not work - what to do.


Cheers -e
--
Eberhard Moenkeberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED])

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2006-06-05 Thread Marcus Rueckert
On 2006-06-05 18:46:33 -0500, Rajko M wrote:
 It doesn't sound obvious to me, Henne.
 The opensuse-users tells me that it is place for users, but nothing 
 specific what to expect there, place for chat or help and support, or 
 both. It will be used just as it is opesuse now, for both.
 
 Few others are lesser vague:
   opensuse-help
   -support
   -installation
   -configuration
 
 The fact that users with problems are coming to opensuse tells:
 - the clear named place for help around opensuse.org product 
 (opensuse-help) is missing
 - opensuse is considered as general discussion list and used as 
 replacement.
 

dont split it too much ... users shouldnt be forced to change the
mailinglist just because the finally got the system installed and now
have a configuration question.

darix

-- 
  openSUSE - SUSE Linux is my linux
  openSUSE is good for you
  www.opensuse.org

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2006-06-05 Thread houghi
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 06:51:41PM -0500, Rajko M wrote:
 Keep it for people that can't decide where to go.

Please. This with a good reply at subscription. It will eiter become a
playground, will grow into something great or whatever.

 Newbies will come in general discussion and than get initial help and 
 directions to better places for particular topic.

Or get pointed to the correct place by a bot or whatever will be decided
upon.

 It was long time ago, but I still remember first Linux installation. I 
 had no clue where to go, what to ask.

I did not even had a clue what to fill out as login. I mean I new the
password, but I had no idea what the login was. No user was added at that
moment. So no other way then to get back to Windows and ask.

houghi
-- 
This openSUSE  mailinglist is about the community.  All discussion about
the community is welcome.If you have a techical question
just subscribe  via this email  address: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
post your original email again there, and you will get a straight answer.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2006-06-05 Thread Rajko M

Marcus Rueckert wrote:

On 2006-06-05 18:46:33 -0500, Rajko M wrote:

It doesn't sound obvious to me, Henne.
The opensuse-users tells me that it is place for users, but nothing 
specific what to expect there, place for chat or help and support, or 
both. It will be used just as it is opesuse now, for both.


Few others are lesser vague:
opensuse-help
-support
-installation
-configuration

The fact that users with problems are coming to opensuse tells:
- the clear named place for help around opensuse.org product 
(opensuse-help) is missing
- opensuse is considered as general discussion list and used as 
replacement.




dont split it too much ... users shouldnt be forced to change the
mailinglist just because the finally got the system installed and now
have a configuration question.

darix



It was just list of words that will make lesser confusion, and in the 
mean time I backed up proposal by Martin Schlander,


Move function of - to:
opensuse-users@ - opensuse-help
opensuse@ - opensuse-project

with addition to keep bare opensuse for newbies, as it seems they like 
it :-)


--
Regards,
Rajko.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] [EMAIL PROTECTED] = opensuse-help gets my vote

2006-06-05 Thread Kenneth Aar, Grafikern.no
Martin Schlander wrote:
 snipHenne's proposal is 
 good - but we should learn from our mistakes and enhance it a little bit.

 opensuse-users@ - opensuse-help

 opensuse@ - opensuse-project

 Who's gonna misunderstand that?
This is the best suggestion so far.

To get rid of of all confusion we must kill opensuse. - And by that I
mean the list, and not the other thingy. ;-)

Henne: I hope you are reading and agree to this. I don't think it's such
a good idea to first change it to opensuse-technical and then discuss it
again, a better soulution has presented itself (IMO)... So we owe it to
ourselves to do it right when we set this plan in motion.

-- 
Regards
Kenneth Aar

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2006-06-05 Thread Rajko M

houghi wrote:

On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 06:51:41PM -0500, Rajko M wrote:

Keep it for people that can't decide where to go.


Please. This with a good reply at subscription. It will eiter become a
playground, will grow into something great or whatever. 


Reply is not really necessity, as most of people come from opensuse.org, 
and there can be set all what one reply can contain and much more. I'll 
see that page again.


Newbies will come in general discussion and than get initial help and 
directions to better places for particular topic.


It would be like in alt.os.linux.suse you ask the question and some come 
up with advice and/or directions where to go from there. A lot of forums 
on opensuse.org.suse-linux.support.* helped for some confusion where to 
post the problem.



Or get pointed to the correct place by a bot or whatever will be decided
upon.


It would be to much for the bot to understand written language and 
decide whether posting is appropriate or not :-)


It was long time ago, but I still remember first Linux installation. I 
had no clue where to go, what to ask.


I did not even had a clue what to fill out as login. I mean I new the
password, but I had no idea what the login was. No user was added at that
moment. So no other way then to get back to Windows and ask.

houghi


The same here :-)
I think S.u.S.E. had in /etc/motd message what to do at login, or it was 
during installation explained what to do ?!

It was really long time ago :-D

--
Regards,
Rajko.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2006-06-05 Thread Randall R Schulz
On Monday 05 June 2006 15:33, Martin Schlander wrote:
 ...

 And then kill [EMAIL PROTECTED] There shouldn't be a plain opensuse@ - too
 confusing for people to figure out which aspects of opensuse belong
 on there - a lot of people like Randall will expect opensuse@ to
 cover every and any aspect of openSUSE as well as SUSE Linux.

Why am I the bad guy here? Because I forced those who consider 
themselves the police of this list to actually say what is and is not 
on-topic for this list and to use words as they're actually defined in 
English?

I did _not_ come to this with any preconceptions nor did I insist one 
way or another. I did not care what the answer was. I was only trying 
to get a clear statement, and it was like pulling teeth to do so.


Don't worry. I'll not be asking any questions in your private 
playground, whatever you decide to call it and whatever misuse of 
English you decide to use in describing it.


 Martin


Randall Schulz

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2006-06-05 Thread Randall R Schulz
On Monday 05 June 2006 21:43, houghi wrote:
 On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 09:18:51PM -0700, Randall R Schulz wrote:
  Why am I the bad guy here?

 Because of your wording.

  Because I forced those who consider
  themselves the police of this list to actually say what is and is
  not on-topic for this list and to use words as they're actually
  defined in English?

 That is so tragic, it is almost funny. At this moment what is on
 topic has not changed. What is on-topic is still very clear to
 everybody else, exept apparently you. Do you already understand what
 a 'community' is?

I certainly do. A community is _people_ not _projects_. You are _not_ 
discussing _the community_, you're discussing _the work_. No matter how 
many times you repeat it, you're not going to change English to suit 
your misunderstanding.

And I am not trying to change anything. I don't care how the list is 
defined, but saying it's about the community makes as much sense as 
saying it's about cheese.


  I did _not_ come to this with any preconceptions nor did I insist
  one way or another.

 Yes, you did. Going on and on and on and on is what I would call
 'insisting'.

You don't know what's in my mind. I insisted only until I got an answer, 
and it did not come from you. You're still insisting on the non-answer.


  I did not care what the answer was.

 Yes, you did. Otherwise you would not be not happy with the answer.

You still don't know what is or is not in my mind and what makes me 
happy or unhappy. Whatever you all want this list to be is fine with 
me. It's not my place to dictate what it is. I have never been confused 
about that.

But if you won't make a clear statement of what that purpose is, you can 
very well expect inappropriate posts. And that's what you have. And 
that's why you have it. You make a statement like it's about the 
community and since no one can make any sense out of that (in this 
context), they post the questions they have.


  I was only trying
  to get a clear statement, and it was like pulling teeth to do so.

 You got a statement and you did not like it. That was the reason you
 kept on going. Seems pretty insisting. Even when you told that one
 person gave you a satisfying answer, you kept bugging about others
 not giving the answer you wanted to hear.

That is what you have insisted from the start, but repeating a 
non-answer and expecting me to consider it an answer is what you were 
and are still doing.

I was satisfied with Graham's answer, since it was explicit, meaningful 
and couched in language and used words that were all completely 
consistent. And I said as much, more than once.

I could not and cannot acknowledge the same for you because you persist 
with the nonsense non-answer.


  Don't worry. I'll not be asking any questions in your private
  playground,

 You already have. The first 7 words of your posting were a question.

There. You're simply being perverse. I take it from this that you just 
want to argue. I guess you must know you're wrong but cannot admit it.


  whatever you decide to call it and whatever misuse of
  English you decide to use in describing it.

 This is exactly the wording why you are 'the bad guy'. With the above
 you asume that no good wording will be found. Such an assumtion is
 degrading. As you have better understanding of the use of English
 words, or so you seem to claim, that is something you should have
 noticed.

I can't tell if you're deliberately twisting my words or just don't 
understand what I wrote.

Perhaps you can contemplate it from the perspective that possibly it's 
another joke you're not getting.


 houghi


RRS

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2006-06-05 Thread houghi
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 10:09:24PM -0700, Randall R Schulz wrote:
snip
I insisted only
snip

quote
 nor did I insist
/quote

Did you insist or did you not insist.

snip the rest. as it is a repeat of what has been said before.

You know what? You are right and I have my peace. So whatever.
plonk

houghi
-- 
This openSUSE  mailinglist is about the community.  All discussion about
the community is welcome.If you have a techical question
just subscribe  via this email  address: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
post your original email again there, and you will get a straight answer.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: User Restrictions (not Child Protection).

2006-05-02 Thread Duncan Mac-Vicar Prett
On Sunday 30 April 2006 03:05, Peter Flodin wrote:
 In a Microsoft Windows domain there is something called Global Policy,
 which means on a per user and per machine, I could lock down all sort
 of settings. eg I could hide control panels, Internet Explorer,
 ability to get to a command line, various system rights etc by just
 checking boxes. And it would apply to my selection of users and/or
 computers in the network.

 I am well aware that many of these restriction can be setup in Linux,
 but there is no central tool (that I am aware of) that I can use to do
 this. eg define these group of settings, restrictions, application
 settings and apply them to these Users.

 Peter Pflodo Flodin

That is called KDE's kiosk, and the GUI to edit that is called kiosk editor
http://extragear.kde.org/apps/kiosktool/

article:
http://enterprise.kde.org/articles/kiosk-lp.php

tutorial
http://developer.kde.org/documentation/tutorials/kiosk/index.html

Duncan

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: User Restrictions (not Child Protection).

2006-04-30 Thread Ciaran Farrell
Am So 30.04.2006 03:05 schrieb Peter Flodin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 In a Microsoft Windows domain there is something called Global Policy,
 which means on a per user and per machine, I could lock down all sort
 of settings. eg I could hide control panels, Internet Explorer,
 ability to get to a command line, various system rights etc by just
 checking boxes. And it would apply to my selection of users and/or
 computers in the network.

 I am well aware that many of these restriction can be setup in Linux,
 but there is no central tool (that I am aware of) that I can use to do
 this. eg define these group of settings, restrictions, application
 settings and apply them to these Users.

Yes! This is pretty much exactly what I meant



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[opensuse] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: User Restrictions (not Child Protection).

2006-04-29 Thread Peter Flodin

I have a proposal that we don't call this feature Child Protection, or
Parental Control or anything similar.

In addition to filtering (I would only use whitelisting) what I would
like to see is an easy way to configure restrictions for users.

I will give a personal example. I have a several computers, one of
which is in a central location visible from our kitchen and eating
area, and is often used by my 4 year old daughter.

I'm quite proud of the fact that she can logon (with username and
password) and run Gcompris and Tux Paint, all by herself, (she can't
read or write). She is allowed to use this computer whenever she
wants, just like she allowed to get pens and paper out and do
drawings.

Now this computer has connection to the internet, and at the moment I
am just relying on her lack of knowledge to get on the internet.

In a Microsoft Windows domain there is something called Global Policy,
which means on a per user and per machine, I could lock down all sort
of settings. eg I could hide control panels, Internet Explorer,
ability to get to a command line, various system rights etc by just
checking boxes. And it would apply to my selection of users and/or
computers in the network.

I am well aware that many of these restriction can be setup in Linux,
but there is no central tool (that I am aware of) that I can use to do
this. eg define these group of settings, restrictions, application
settings and apply them to these Users.

Peter Pflodo Flodin