Re: PESO - Snowproofed

2010-01-15 Thread mike wilson

 Tim Bray tb...@textuality.com wrote: 
 On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  The claim of any environment is the exaggeration.  If one goes below
  -10C, what about that environment, or what about extremely hot
  conditions?
 
 Normally, electronic circuits work just fine at arbitrarily cold
 temperatures (not necessarily when they get too hot), so I'm wondering
 if there are mechanical issues that could come into play at very cold
 temperatures.  Otherwise, why would they provide a low-temperature
 threshold?  -T

It _used_ to be due to (mainly) battery and/or lubrication issues.  Since the 
advent of lithium (in all its flavours) for batteries and constructional 
plastics that have some lubrication qualities, reducing the need for grease, 
these issues have receded somewhat.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: PESO - Snowproofed

2010-01-15 Thread AlunFoto
2010/1/15 mike wilson m.9.wil...@ntlworld.com:

  Tim Bray tb...@textuality.com wrote:
 On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote:

  The claim of any environment is the exaggeration.  If one goes below
  -10C, what about that environment, or what about extremely hot
  conditions?

 Normally, electronic circuits work just fine at arbitrarily cold
 temperatures (not necessarily when they get too hot), so I'm wondering
 if there are mechanical issues that could come into play at very cold
 temperatures.  Otherwise, why would they provide a low-temperature
 threshold?  -T

 It _used_ to be due to (mainly) battery and/or lubrication issues.
 Since the advent of lithium (in all its flavours) for batteries and
 constructional plastics that have some lubrication qualities, reducing
 the need for grease, these issues have receded somewhat.

That's the point, isn't it. We used to have cameras that were not
guaranteed to work in even moderately bad weather. Then there was a
lot of raving over images obtained under conditions that were outside
warranty. Now that materials have approved, people go whining about
the folly of taking the same risks.

The only thing camera improvement seems to spawn is ever more
demanding customers.

Jostein

-- 
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Snowproofed

2010-01-15 Thread AlunFoto
2010/1/15 AlunFoto alunf...@gmail.com:
  Now that materials have approved,

improved, of course.

Jostein


-- 
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Snowproofed

2010-01-15 Thread Tom C
Don't blame the customer though.  It's the camera manufacturer that
'weatherized' the product and then sold it on that basis.  While I
don't believe every word I read, I also think the customer has a right
to at least heightened expectations.

Tom

On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 3:19 AM, AlunFoto alunf...@gmail.com wrote:
 2010/1/15 mike wilson m.9.wil...@ntlworld.com:

  Tim Bray tb...@textuality.com wrote:
 On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote:

  The claim of any environment is the exaggeration.  If one goes below
  -10C, what about that environment, or what about extremely hot
  conditions?

 Normally, electronic circuits work just fine at arbitrarily cold
 temperatures (not necessarily when they get too hot), so I'm wondering
 if there are mechanical issues that could come into play at very cold
 temperatures.  Otherwise, why would they provide a low-temperature
 threshold?  -T

 It _used_ to be due to (mainly) battery and/or lubrication issues.
 Since the advent of lithium (in all its flavours) for batteries and
 constructional plastics that have some lubrication qualities, reducing
 the need for grease, these issues have receded somewhat.

 That's the point, isn't it. We used to have cameras that were not
 guaranteed to work in even moderately bad weather. Then there was a
 lot of raving over images obtained under conditions that were outside
 warranty. Now that materials have approved, people go whining about
 the folly of taking the same risks.

 The only thing camera improvement seems to spawn is ever more
 demanding customers.

 Jostein

 --
 http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
 http://alunfoto.blogspot.com

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Snowproofed

2010-01-15 Thread William Robb



, AlunFoto  wrote:


The only thing camera improvement seems to spawn is ever more
demanding customers.


It's the same way with everything.
As an example, just about every safety improvement that has tricked down 
into automobiles has led to a higher collision rate.


William Robb 



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Snowproofed

2010-01-15 Thread Thomas Cakalic
For instance?

On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 10:01 AM, William Robb war...@gmail.com wrote:


 , AlunFoto  wrote:

 The only thing camera improvement seems to spawn is ever more
 demanding customers.

 It's the same way with everything.
 As an example, just about every safety improvement that has tricked down
 into automobiles has led to a higher collision rate.

 William Robb

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
 follow the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Snowproofed

2010-01-15 Thread William Robb


- Original Message - 
From: Thomas Cakalic

Subject: Re: PESO - Snowproofed


For instance?

Seat belts, radial tires, strut type suspension, ABS brakes (a real biggie), 
air bags.
Pretty much anything that has been marketed to make the driver think that 
they can either push the envelope a bit harder or that has been sold as 
making the driver safer in a crash has resulted in more accidents rather 
than less.

At least that's what my friend at SGI Claims tells me.

William Robb 



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Snowproofed

2010-01-15 Thread Tom C
I see the point you're making.  I think you're friend though, may be
misinformed.  Take a look at these two links:

http://www-fars.nhtsa.dot.gov/Main/index.aspx

http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/cats/transportation/motor_vehicle_accidents_and_fatalities.html
 (look at first .xls)

The last referenced link indicates that over the last 30 or so years,
collisions dropped by about 40% and fatalities dropped by about half,
depending on which statistic is being considered.

Even if the number of accidents stayed constant, it would statiscially
be at a lower rate because there are more vehicles and drivers with
each passing year.

This was US data, I can't speak for Canadians. ;-)

I love/hate antilock brakes. I like that it prevents me from going
into an uncontrolled skid, but then again when I'm using studded tires
going down a steep icy road with 50 - 300 ft. drop offs, when I tell
the car to stop, I want it to STOP, and with antilock brakes it slows
but keeps going.

I understand what your saying, there's always the subset of the
population that acts invincible behind the wheel because they have 4WD
or AWD, but statistically the safety features may/seem to prevent
accidents/save lives.  Of course there are other factors that go into
the statistics besides just car safety features.  Drunk driving
penalties and enforcement is up, etc.

Tom




On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 10:36 AM, William Robb war...@gmail.com wrote:

 - Original Message - From: Thomas Cakalic
 Subject: Re: PESO - Snowproofed


 For instance?

 Seat belts, radial tires, strut type suspension, ABS brakes (a real biggie),
 air bags.
 Pretty much anything that has been marketed to make the driver think that
 they can either push the envelope a bit harder or that has been sold as
 making the driver safer in a crash has resulted in more accidents rather
 than less.
 At least that's what my friend at SGI Claims tells me.

 William Robb

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
 follow the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Snowproofed

2010-01-15 Thread AlunFoto
2010/1/15 Tom C caka...@gmail.com:
 Don't blame the customer though.  It's the camera manufacturer that
 'weatherized' the product and then sold it on that basis.  While I
 don't believe every word I read, I also think the customer has a right
 to at least heightened expectations.

For heigthened expectations? Certainly not.
For whining about not getting it like spoiled kids? Definately.

The currently most purebred Pentax whiner runs a blog called RiceHigh,
nicknamed RiceWhine. http://ricehigh.blogspot.com/

There's been preciously little of it around here for some time.

Jostein

-- 
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Snowproofed

2010-01-15 Thread William Robb


- Original Message - 
From: Tom C

Subject: Re: PESO - Snowproofed



I see the point you're making.  I think you're friend though, may be
misinformed.  Take a look at these two links:


He is prone to hyperbole.
However, in Saskatchewan, collision rates have inceased substantially since 
1983 (~4 in 1983 to ~5 in 2007).
Saskatchewans population has not changed significantly during that time. we 
always seem to hover around a population of 1 million in this province, so 
for where we are living, I suspect he is right.


http://www.sgi.sk.ca/sgi_pub/road_safety/trafficcollisionstats/pdf/2007/TAIS_07_section1.pdf


William Robb 



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Snowproofed

2010-01-15 Thread John Sessoms

From: Thomas Cakalic

For instance?

On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 10:01 AM, William Robb war...@gmail.com wrote:



 , AlunFoto ?wrote:


 The only thing camera improvement seems to spawn is ever more
 demanding customers.


 It's the same way with everything.
 As an example, just about every safety improvement that has tricked down
 into automobiles has led to a higher collision rate.


Indirect result: Safer cars + better roads - more cars on the road - 
more opportunities for collisions to occur.


Plus, safer cars tempt people to drive in bad weather, resulting again 
in more opportunities for collisions; just like weatherproofed cameras 
tempt photographers to go out and take photos in bad weather.



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Snowproofed

2010-01-15 Thread Ken Waller


Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f

- Original Message - 
From: William Robb war...@gmail.com


Subject: Re: PESO - Snowproofed





, AlunFoto  wrote:


The only thing camera improvement seems to spawn is ever more
demanding customers.


It's the same way with everything.
As an example, just about every safety improvement that has tricked down 
into automobiles has led to a higher collision rate.


In the case of autos, I'm not sure the correct adjective is 'demanding', in 
some cases stupid is closer to the truth.




William Robb



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Snowproofed

2010-01-15 Thread Ken Waller


Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f

- Original Message - 
From: William Robb war...@gmail.com

Subject: Re: PESO - Snowproofed




- Original Message - 
From: Thomas Cakalic

Subject: Re: PESO - Snowproofed


For instance?

Seat belts, radial tires, strut type suspension, ABS brakes (a real 
biggie), air bags.
Pretty much anything that has been marketed to make the driver think that 
they can either push the envelope a bit harder or that has been sold as 
making the driver safer in a crash has resulted in more accidents rather 
than less.

At least that's what my friend at SGI Claims tells me.


My experiences in the auto industry are inline with your friend's



William Robb



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


RE: PESO - Snowproofed

2010-01-15 Thread Bob W
 
  The only thing camera improvement seems to spawn is ever more 
  demanding customers.
 
  It's the same way with everything.
  As an example, just about every safety improvement that has tricked 
  down into automobiles has led to a higher collision rate.
 
 In the case of autos, I'm not sure the correct adjective is 
 'demanding', in some cases stupid is closer to the truth.

Surely not!

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/8454242.stm

Bob


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Snowproofed

2010-01-15 Thread Ken Waller


Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f

- Original Message - 
From: Bob W p...@web-options.com


Subject: RE: PESO - Snowproofed




 The only thing camera improvement seems to spawn is ever more
 demanding customers.

 It's the same way with everything.
 As an example, just about every safety improvement that has tricked
 down into automobiles has led to a higher collision rate.

In the case of autos, I'm not sure the correct adjective is
'demanding', in some cases stupid is closer to the truth.


Surely not!

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/8454242.stm


In the U.S. this would probably result in a lawsuit against the manufacturer 
cause they didn't foresee this as a possible use of an auto  provide 
warning. or floatation   ;+]




Bob



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Snowproofed

2010-01-15 Thread Rob Studdert
On 15/01/2010, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote:

 The claim of any environment is the exaggeration.  If one goes below
 -10C, what about that environment, or what about extremely hot
 conditions?

 Waterproof and weather resistant are obviously two different things.

 My 2 cents. Given all that I'd be disappointed in the failure as well,
 as expectations that were set by the manufacturers claims were not
 met.

I've managed to use all my cameras in rain over the years without a
single failure but I'm careful how I do it. I trust no claims of
weather sealing and as has been pointed out many times on various
lists neither do the manufacturers.

There is an Internationally recognised method of rating sealing that
is very specific which I think only Oly may have utilised in reference
to cameras. All sorts of other hand held electronic equipment seems to
be able to be successfully rated but obviously in the case of cameras
it would be far too revealing, not a great marketing tool.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IP_Code

Mostly here there are discussions about cold performance but heat is
an enemy too. It seems that hotter days here aren't conducive to movie
making on the K-x, there have been various reports of stuttering and
complete failure though I've yet to experience problems (but I've only
shot video on mild hays so far). I wonder what the heat range for
shooting video on the K7 is?

Cheers,
-- 
Rob Studdert (Digital  Image Studio)
Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours
Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


RE: PESO - Snowproofed

2010-01-15 Thread Bob W
  
   The only thing camera improvement seems to spawn is ever more 
   demanding customers.
  
   It's the same way with everything.
   As an example, just about every safety improvement that 
 has tricked 
   down into automobiles has led to a higher collision rate.
 
  In the case of autos, I'm not sure the correct adjective is 
  'demanding', in some cases stupid is closer to the truth.
 
  Surely not!
 
  http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/8454242.stm
 
 In the U.S. this would probably result in a lawsuit against 
 the manufacturer cause they didn't foresee this as a possible 
 use of an auto  provide 
 warning. or floatation   ;+]
 

I'd have a go at British Waterways too.

Bob


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Snowproofed

2010-01-14 Thread AlunFoto
Sorry to hear, Stig.
I should perhaps add that a Canon D-7 succumbed to moisture at the
particular landing where I took my photo. Fortunately it came back to
life after roughly two days of drying out, but in principle it's a
camera with about the same level of weather protection as has the K-7.
So maybe I was lucky? At least I was deliberately pushing my luck...

Jostein

2010/1/14 SV Hovland p...@heime.org:
 My K-7 stopped working after two hours in rain and is currently at Pentax for 
 repair which I have to pay myself. I was told by Pentax that it is not meant 
 to withstand normal autumn rain in Norway for two hours. The sealing was 
 meant for withstanding light rain for a short time, I was told. So from now 
 on I have to treat it like its not weather proofed at all.

 Stig Vidar Hovland


 
 Fra: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [pdml-boun...@pdml.net] p#229; vegne av Jim King 
 [jamesk8...@mac.com]
 Sendt: 13. januar 2010 19:25
 Til: pdml@pdml.net
 Emne: Re: PESO - Snowproofed

A great example of K-7/DA* weatherproofing.  You ought to send it to
Pentax as a candidate for an advertisement.

Regards, Jim
 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.




-- 
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Snowproofed

2010-01-14 Thread SV Hovland
I don't think its going to be expensive. My camera started to work again after 
two days on drying and I used it for a month or two before I sent it in. Pentax 
confirmed residual of water inside, but I was lucky and no circuit boards or 
mechanics seemed to be damaged. So it ended up in a small service which 
shouldn't cost me to much. But I am still surprised about the response I got 
after all the marketing Pentax has done on its weather resistance. I would 
believe it could be used in normal autumn weather in Norway, but not so.

For those interested: It rained 3-4mm / hour which my K-7 was able to handle 
for a period of two hours. 3-4mm / hour is perhaps a lot of rain, but still 
normal where I live.

Stig Vidar Hovland


Fra: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [pdml-boun...@pdml.net] p#229; vegne av AlunFoto 
[alunf...@gmail.com]
Sendt: 14. januar 2010 11:33
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Re: PESO - Snowproofed

Sorry to hear, Stig.
I should perhaps add that a Canon D-7 succumbed to moisture at the
particular landing where I took my photo. Fortunately it came back to
life after roughly two days of drying out, but in principle it's a
camera with about the same level of weather protection as has the K-7.
So maybe I was lucky? At least I was deliberately pushing my luck...

Jostein

2010/1/14 SV Hovland p...@heime.org:
 My K-7 stopped working after two hours in rain and is currently at Pentax for 
 repair which I have to pay myself. I was told by Pentax that it is not meant 
 to withstand normal autumn rain in Norway for two hours. The sealing was 
 meant for withstanding light rain for a short time, I was told. So from now 
 on I have to treat it like its not weather proofed at all.

 Stig Vidar Hovland


 
 Fra: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [pdml-boun...@pdml.net] p#229; vegne av Jim King 
 [jamesk8...@mac.com]
 Sendt: 13. januar 2010 19:25
 Til: pdml@pdml.net
 Emne: Re: PESO - Snowproofed

A great example of K-7/DA* weatherproofing.  You ought to send it to
Pentax as a candidate for an advertisement.

Regards, Jim
 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.




--
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.
-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Snowproofed

2010-01-14 Thread Tom C
I've used my PZ-1p and *ist D NON-WEATHER SEALED cameras in rain and
snow conditions numerous times where after shooting I needed to dry
the camera with a towel and never had a problem.

It would be interesting to know just how long one of these
weather-sealed bodies would last in a controlled test.

I'm inclined to believe, that the weather resistant claims are more
a sales pitch, than a true feature that can be counted on and pressed
to any degree.  Jostein's camera could very well fail the next time he
uses it in exactly the same conditions as it successfully operated in
before.

It's like when I purchase a pair of pants.  If the product has a claim
of Resists wrinkles, that really means It wrinkles, because all
fabrics RESIST wrinkling.  When it says Wrinkle-free or no ironing
then I find it pretty much to be true.  But even then...

So I interpret the claim of weather resistant to mean It leaks.

Obviously the claim on the Pentax website is exaggerated.  It reads:

Weather, dust and cold resistant
The K-7 is weather, dust and cold resistant (to 14° F or -10° C),
making it ideal for use in any environment.

I know it has umpty-ump seals and so forth, but all cameras are
weather, dust and cold resistant because they're solid objects and
99+% of the body is impervious to water..  Water always follows the
course of least resistance and typically that is down and off.
Electronics and mechanisms tend to keep working UNTIL they are
overcome by the temperature.

The claim of any environment is the exaggeration.  If one goes below
-10C, what about that environment, or what about extremely hot
conditions?

Waterproof and weather resistant are obviously two different things.

My 2 cents. Given all that I'd be disappointed in the failure as well,
as expectations that were set by the manufacturers claims were not
met.

Tom



On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 3:59 AM, SV Hovland p...@heime.org wrote:
 I don't think its going to be expensive. My camera started to work again 
 after two days on drying and I used it for a month or two before I sent it 
 in. Pentax confirmed residual of water inside, but I was lucky and no circuit 
 boards or mechanics seemed to be damaged. So it ended up in a small service 
 which shouldn't cost me to much. But I am still surprised about the response 
 I got after all the marketing Pentax has done on its weather resistance. I 
 would believe it could be used in normal autumn weather in Norway, but not so.

 For those interested: It rained 3-4mm / hour which my K-7 was able to handle 
 for a period of two hours. 3-4mm / hour is perhaps a lot of rain, but still 
 normal where I live.

 Stig Vidar Hovland

 
 Fra: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [pdml-boun...@pdml.net] p#229; vegne av AlunFoto 
 [alunf...@gmail.com]
 Sendt: 14. januar 2010 11:33
 Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 Emne: Re: PESO - Snowproofed

 Sorry to hear, Stig.
 I should perhaps add that a Canon D-7 succumbed to moisture at the
 particular landing where I took my photo. Fortunately it came back to
 life after roughly two days of drying out, but in principle it's a
 camera with about the same level of weather protection as has the K-7.
 So maybe I was lucky? At least I was deliberately pushing my luck...

 Jostein

 2010/1/14 SV Hovland p...@heime.org:
 My K-7 stopped working after two hours in rain and is currently at Pentax 
 for repair which I have to pay myself. I was told by Pentax that it is not 
 meant to withstand normal autumn rain in Norway for two hours. The sealing 
 was meant for withstanding light rain for a short time, I was told. So from 
 now on I have to treat it like its not weather proofed at all.

 Stig Vidar Hovland


 
 Fra: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [pdml-boun...@pdml.net] p#229; vegne av Jim King 
 [jamesk8...@mac.com]
 Sendt: 13. januar 2010 19:25
 Til: pdml@pdml.net
 Emne: Re: PESO - Snowproofed

A great example of K-7/DA* weatherproofing.  You ought to send it to
Pentax as a candidate for an advertisement.

Regards, Jim
 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
 follow the directions.




 --
 http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
 http://alunfoto.blogspot.com

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.
 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Snowproofed

2010-01-14 Thread Tim Bray
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote:

 The claim of any environment is the exaggeration.  If one goes below
 -10C, what about that environment, or what about extremely hot
 conditions?

As I've mentioned here, I visit Saskatchewan every winter and always
try to do a photowalk.  I've taken tons of pictures with both my
*ist-D and K20 at temperatures like -35°C and never had any trouble.
Normally, electronic circuits work just fine at arbitrarily cold
temperatures (not necessarily when they get too hot), so I'm wondering
if there are mechanical issues that could come into play at very cold
temperatures.  Otherwise, why would they provide a low-temperature
threshold?  -T

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Snowproofed

2010-01-14 Thread Tom C
My thought as well... I'm guessing mirror/shutter and screwdrive for
the AF mainly.

Tom

On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Tim Bray tb...@textuality.com wrote:
 On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote:

 The claim of any environment is the exaggeration.  If one goes below
 -10C, what about that environment, or what about extremely hot
 conditions?

 As I've mentioned here, I visit Saskatchewan every winter and always
 try to do a photowalk.  I've taken tons of pictures with both my
 *ist-D and K20 at temperatures like -35°C and never had any trouble.
 Normally, electronic circuits work just fine at arbitrarily cold
 temperatures (not necessarily when they get too hot), so I'm wondering
 if there are mechanical issues that could come into play at very cold
 temperatures.  Otherwise, why would they provide a low-temperature
 threshold?  -T

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


RE: PESO - Snowproofed

2010-01-14 Thread Bob W
 I know it has umpty-ump seals and so forth, but all cameras 
 are weather, dust and cold resistant because they're solid objects and
 99+% of the body is impervious to water..  Water always follows the
 course of least resistance and typically that is down and off.
 Electronics and mechanisms tend to keep working UNTIL they 
 are overcome by the temperature.
 

Olympus make some fairly strong claims about their weatherproofing:
http://www.olympus.co.uk/consumer/dslr_E-3_Made_for_the_Extreme.htm 

Maybe all the non-sealed bodies are equally robust, but I wouldn't want to
test it on my own kit. My Leica M8 didn't even resist a splash of beer in a
pub, whereas my Olympus E-1 has frequently stood up to very long periods
(hours) of heavy rain.

Bob


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Snowproofed

2010-01-14 Thread Ken Waller
I've shot alot in the rain  snow, mostly from a tripod and I've always 
protected it as much as possible with a towel or my b-ball cap, never had an 
issue with any of them - PZ, PZ-1P, MZ-S, *istD, K10D or K20D., 28-80 F, 
70-210F, 300 f4.5 FA, 600 FA.


I wouldn't consider any device like a camera body (except a Nikonos) or lens 
to be impervious to damage from moisture.


Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f

- Original Message - 
From: Tom C caka...@gmail.com

Subject: Re: PESO - Snowproofed



I've used my PZ-1p and *ist D NON-WEATHER SEALED cameras in rain and
snow conditions numerous times where after shooting I needed to dry
the camera with a towel and never had a problem.



It would be interesting to know just how long one of these
weather-sealed bodies would last in a controlled test.



I'm inclined to believe, that the weather resistant claims are more
a sales pitch, than a true feature that can be counted on and pressed
to any degree.  Jostein's camera could very well fail the next time he
uses it in exactly the same conditions as it successfully operated in
before.


Interestingly, my cheapee Timex watch states on the back 'Water resistant to 
100m'




It's like when I purchase a pair of pants.  If the product has a claim
of Resists wrinkles, that really means It wrinkles, because all
fabrics RESIST wrinkling.  When it says Wrinkle-free or no ironing
then I find it pretty much to be true.  But even then...



So I interpret the claim of weather resistant to mean It leaks.



Obviously the claim on the Pentax website is exaggerated.  It reads:



Weather, dust and cold resistant
The K-7 is weather, dust and cold resistant (to 14° F or -10° C),
making it ideal for use in any environment.



I know it has umpty-ump seals and so forth, but all cameras are
weather, dust and cold resistant because they're solid objects and
99+% of the body is impervious to water..  Water always follows the
course of least resistance and typically that is down and off.
Electronics and mechanisms tend to keep working UNTIL they are
overcome by the temperature.



The claim of any environment is the exaggeration.  If one goes below
-10C, what about that environment, or what about extremely hot
conditions?



Waterproof and weather resistant are obviously two different things.



My 2 cents. Given all that I'd be disappointed in the failure as well,
as expectations that were set by the manufacturers claims were not
met.



Tom




On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 3:59 AM, SV Hovland p...@heime.org wrote:
I don't think its going to be expensive. My camera started to work again 
after two days on drying and I used it for a month or two before I sent it 
in. Pentax confirmed residual of water inside, but I was lucky and no 
circuit boards or mechanics seemed to be damaged. So it ended up in a 
small service which shouldn't cost me to much. But I am still surprised 
about the response I got after all the marketing Pentax has done on its 
weather resistance. I would believe it could be used in normal autumn 
weather in Norway, but not so.


For those interested: It rained 3-4mm / hour which my K-7 was able to 
handle for a period of two hours. 3-4mm / hour is perhaps a lot of rain, 
but still normal where I live.


Stig Vidar Hovland


Fra: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [pdml-boun...@pdml.net] p#229; vegne av 
AlunFoto [alunf...@gmail.com]

Sendt: 14. januar 2010 11:33
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Re: PESO - Snowproofed

Sorry to hear, Stig.
I should perhaps add that a Canon D-7 succumbed to moisture at the
particular landing where I took my photo. Fortunately it came back to
life after roughly two days of drying out, but in principle it's a
camera with about the same level of weather protection as has the K-7.
So maybe I was lucky? At least I was deliberately pushing my luck...

Jostein

2010/1/14 SV Hovland p...@heime.org:
My K-7 stopped working after two hours in rain and is currently at Pentax 
for repair which I have to pay myself. I was told by Pentax that it is 
not meant to withstand normal autumn rain in Norway for two hours. The 
sealing was meant for withstanding light rain for a short time, I was 
told. So from now on I have to treat it like its not weather proofed at 
all.


Stig Vidar Hovland



Fra: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [pdml-boun...@pdml.net] p#229; vegne av Jim 
King [jamesk8...@mac.com]

Sendt: 13. januar 2010 19:25
Til: pdml@pdml.net
Emne: Re: PESO - Snowproofed


A great example of K-7/DA* weatherproofing. You ought to send it to
Pentax as a candidate for an advertisement.



Regards, Jim

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions.






--
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman

Re: PESO - Snowproofed

2010-01-14 Thread Tom C
I've used a gallon size ZipLock bag in the past.  It keeps the camera
totally dry between shots and I can pretty much just pull the bag up
over the edge of the lens and still operate most controls, again on a
tripod.

Tom

On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Ken Waller kwal...@peoplepc.com wrote:
 I've shot alot in the rain  snow, mostly from a tripod and I've always
 protected it as much as possible with a towel or my b-ball cap, never had an
 issue with any of them - PZ, PZ-1P, MZ-S, *istD, K10D or K20D., 28-80 F,
 70-210F, 300 f4.5 FA, 600 FA.

 I wouldn't consider any device like a camera body (except a Nikonos) or lens
 to be impervious to damage from moisture.

 Kenneth Waller
 http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f

 - Original Message - From: Tom C caka...@gmail.com
 Subject: Re: PESO - Snowproofed


 I've used my PZ-1p and *ist D NON-WEATHER SEALED cameras in rain and
 snow conditions numerous times where after shooting I needed to dry
 the camera with a towel and never had a problem.

 It would be interesting to know just how long one of these
 weather-sealed bodies would last in a controlled test.

 I'm inclined to believe, that the weather resistant claims are more
 a sales pitch, than a true feature that can be counted on and pressed
 to any degree.  Jostein's camera could very well fail the next time he
 uses it in exactly the same conditions as it successfully operated in
 before.

 Interestingly, my cheapee Timex watch states on the back 'Water resistant to
 100m'


 It's like when I purchase a pair of pants.  If the product has a claim
 of Resists wrinkles, that really means It wrinkles, because all
 fabrics RESIST wrinkling.  When it says Wrinkle-free or no ironing
 then I find it pretty much to be true.  But even then...

 So I interpret the claim of weather resistant to mean It leaks.

 Obviously the claim on the Pentax website is exaggerated.  It reads:

 Weather, dust and cold resistant
 The K-7 is weather, dust and cold resistant (to 14° F or -10° C),
 making it ideal for use in any environment.

 I know it has umpty-ump seals and so forth, but all cameras are
 weather, dust and cold resistant because they're solid objects and
 99+% of the body is impervious to water..  Water always follows the
 course of least resistance and typically that is down and off.
 Electronics and mechanisms tend to keep working UNTIL they are
 overcome by the temperature.

 The claim of any environment is the exaggeration.  If one goes below
 -10C, what about that environment, or what about extremely hot
 conditions?

 Waterproof and weather resistant are obviously two different things.

 My 2 cents. Given all that I'd be disappointed in the failure as well,
 as expectations that were set by the manufacturers claims were not
 met.

 Tom



 On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 3:59 AM, SV Hovland p...@heime.org wrote:

 I don't think its going to be expensive. My camera started to work again
 after two days on drying and I used it for a month or two before I sent it
 in. Pentax confirmed residual of water inside, but I was lucky and no
 circuit boards or mechanics seemed to be damaged. So it ended up in a small
 service which shouldn't cost me to much. But I am still surprised about the
 response I got after all the marketing Pentax has done on its weather
 resistance. I would believe it could be used in normal autumn weather in
 Norway, but not so.

 For those interested: It rained 3-4mm / hour which my K-7 was able to
 handle for a period of two hours. 3-4mm / hour is perhaps a lot of rain, but
 still normal where I live.

 Stig Vidar Hovland

 
 Fra: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [pdml-boun...@pdml.net] p#229; vegne av
 AlunFoto [alunf...@gmail.com]
 Sendt: 14. januar 2010 11:33
 Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 Emne: Re: PESO - Snowproofed

 Sorry to hear, Stig.
 I should perhaps add that a Canon D-7 succumbed to moisture at the
 particular landing where I took my photo. Fortunately it came back to
 life after roughly two days of drying out, but in principle it's a
 camera with about the same level of weather protection as has the K-7.
 So maybe I was lucky? At least I was deliberately pushing my luck...

 Jostein

 2010/1/14 SV Hovland p...@heime.org:

 My K-7 stopped working after two hours in rain and is currently at Pentax
 for repair which I have to pay myself. I was told by Pentax that it is not
 meant to withstand normal autumn rain in Norway for two hours. The sealing
 was meant for withstanding light rain for a short time, I was told. So from
 now on I have to treat it like its not weather proofed at all.

 Stig Vidar Hovland


 
 Fra: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [pdml-boun...@pdml.net] p#229; vegne av Jim
 King [jamesk8...@mac.com]
 Sendt: 13. januar 2010 19:25
 Til: pdml@pdml.net
 Emne: Re: PESO - Snowproofed

 A great example of K-7/DA* weatherproofing. You ought to send it to
 Pentax as a candidate for an advertisement.

 Regards, Jim

Re: PESO - Snowproofed

2010-01-14 Thread Tom C
I'm sure the Timex watch claim is true.  It resists... but as we all know...

On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Ken Waller kwal...@peoplepc.com wrote:
 I've shot alot in the rain  snow, mostly from a tripod and I've always
 protected it as much as possible with a towel or my b-ball cap, never had an
 issue with any of them - PZ, PZ-1P, MZ-S, *istD, K10D or K20D., 28-80 F,
 70-210F, 300 f4.5 FA, 600 FA.

 I wouldn't consider any device like a camera body (except a Nikonos) or lens
 to be impervious to damage from moisture.

 Kenneth Waller
 http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f

 - Original Message - From: Tom C caka...@gmail.com
 Subject: Re: PESO - Snowproofed


 I've used my PZ-1p and *ist D NON-WEATHER SEALED cameras in rain and
 snow conditions numerous times where after shooting I needed to dry
 the camera with a towel and never had a problem.

 It would be interesting to know just how long one of these
 weather-sealed bodies would last in a controlled test.

 I'm inclined to believe, that the weather resistant claims are more
 a sales pitch, than a true feature that can be counted on and pressed
 to any degree.  Jostein's camera could very well fail the next time he
 uses it in exactly the same conditions as it successfully operated in
 before.

 Interestingly, my cheapee Timex watch states on the back 'Water resistant to
 100m'


 It's like when I purchase a pair of pants.  If the product has a claim
 of Resists wrinkles, that really means It wrinkles, because all
 fabrics RESIST wrinkling.  When it says Wrinkle-free or no ironing
 then I find it pretty much to be true.  But even then...

 So I interpret the claim of weather resistant to mean It leaks.

 Obviously the claim on the Pentax website is exaggerated.  It reads:

 Weather, dust and cold resistant
 The K-7 is weather, dust and cold resistant (to 14° F or -10° C),
 making it ideal for use in any environment.

 I know it has umpty-ump seals and so forth, but all cameras are
 weather, dust and cold resistant because they're solid objects and
 99+% of the body is impervious to water..  Water always follows the
 course of least resistance and typically that is down and off.
 Electronics and mechanisms tend to keep working UNTIL they are
 overcome by the temperature.

 The claim of any environment is the exaggeration.  If one goes below
 -10C, what about that environment, or what about extremely hot
 conditions?

 Waterproof and weather resistant are obviously two different things.

 My 2 cents. Given all that I'd be disappointed in the failure as well,
 as expectations that were set by the manufacturers claims were not
 met.

 Tom



 On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 3:59 AM, SV Hovland p...@heime.org wrote:

 I don't think its going to be expensive. My camera started to work again
 after two days on drying and I used it for a month or two before I sent it
 in. Pentax confirmed residual of water inside, but I was lucky and no
 circuit boards or mechanics seemed to be damaged. So it ended up in a small
 service which shouldn't cost me to much. But I am still surprised about the
 response I got after all the marketing Pentax has done on its weather
 resistance. I would believe it could be used in normal autumn weather in
 Norway, but not so.

 For those interested: It rained 3-4mm / hour which my K-7 was able to
 handle for a period of two hours. 3-4mm / hour is perhaps a lot of rain, but
 still normal where I live.

 Stig Vidar Hovland

 
 Fra: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [pdml-boun...@pdml.net] p#229; vegne av
 AlunFoto [alunf...@gmail.com]
 Sendt: 14. januar 2010 11:33
 Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 Emne: Re: PESO - Snowproofed

 Sorry to hear, Stig.
 I should perhaps add that a Canon D-7 succumbed to moisture at the
 particular landing where I took my photo. Fortunately it came back to
 life after roughly two days of drying out, but in principle it's a
 camera with about the same level of weather protection as has the K-7.
 So maybe I was lucky? At least I was deliberately pushing my luck...

 Jostein

 2010/1/14 SV Hovland p...@heime.org:

 My K-7 stopped working after two hours in rain and is currently at Pentax
 for repair which I have to pay myself. I was told by Pentax that it is not
 meant to withstand normal autumn rain in Norway for two hours. The sealing
 was meant for withstanding light rain for a short time, I was told. So from
 now on I have to treat it like its not weather proofed at all.

 Stig Vidar Hovland


 
 Fra: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [pdml-boun...@pdml.net] p#229; vegne av Jim
 King [jamesk8...@mac.com]
 Sendt: 13. januar 2010 19:25
 Til: pdml@pdml.net
 Emne: Re: PESO - Snowproofed

 A great example of K-7/DA* weatherproofing. You ought to send it to
 Pentax as a candidate for an advertisement.

 Regards, Jim

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link

Re: PESO - Snowproofed

2010-01-14 Thread John Sessoms

http://optechusa.com/product/detail/?PRODUCT_ID=73

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Snowproofed

2010-01-14 Thread Bob Sullivan
Had the PZ-1 die at a pig roast long ago.  It was new and in/out of
the moist smoke.  Pentax made repairs under warranty.
That's my only failure.
Regards, Bob S.

On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Ken Waller kwal...@peoplepc.com wrote:
 I've shot alot in the rain  snow, mostly from a tripod and I've always
 protected it as much as possible with a towel or my b-ball cap, never had an
 issue with any of them - PZ, PZ-1P, MZ-S, *istD, K10D or K20D., 28-80 F,
 70-210F, 300 f4.5 FA, 600 FA.

 I wouldn't consider any device like a camera body (except a Nikonos) or lens
 to be impervious to damage from moisture.

 Kenneth Waller
 http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f

 - Original Message - From: Tom C caka...@gmail.com
 Subject: Re: PESO - Snowproofed


 I've used my PZ-1p and *ist D NON-WEATHER SEALED cameras in rain and
 snow conditions numerous times where after shooting I needed to dry
 the camera with a towel and never had a problem.

 It would be interesting to know just how long one of these
 weather-sealed bodies would last in a controlled test.

 I'm inclined to believe, that the weather resistant claims are more
 a sales pitch, than a true feature that can be counted on and pressed
 to any degree.  Jostein's camera could very well fail the next time he
 uses it in exactly the same conditions as it successfully operated in
 before.

 Interestingly, my cheapee Timex watch states on the back 'Water resistant to
 100m'


 It's like when I purchase a pair of pants.  If the product has a claim
 of Resists wrinkles, that really means It wrinkles, because all
 fabrics RESIST wrinkling.  When it says Wrinkle-free or no ironing
 then I find it pretty much to be true.  But even then...

 So I interpret the claim of weather resistant to mean It leaks.

 Obviously the claim on the Pentax website is exaggerated.  It reads:

 Weather, dust and cold resistant
 The K-7 is weather, dust and cold resistant (to 14° F or -10° C),
 making it ideal for use in any environment.

 I know it has umpty-ump seals and so forth, but all cameras are
 weather, dust and cold resistant because they're solid objects and
 99+% of the body is impervious to water..  Water always follows the
 course of least resistance and typically that is down and off.
 Electronics and mechanisms tend to keep working UNTIL they are
 overcome by the temperature.

 The claim of any environment is the exaggeration.  If one goes below
 -10C, what about that environment, or what about extremely hot
 conditions?

 Waterproof and weather resistant are obviously two different things.

 My 2 cents. Given all that I'd be disappointed in the failure as well,
 as expectations that were set by the manufacturers claims were not
 met.

 Tom



 On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 3:59 AM, SV Hovland p...@heime.org wrote:

 I don't think its going to be expensive. My camera started to work again
 after two days on drying and I used it for a month or two before I sent it
 in. Pentax confirmed residual of water inside, but I was lucky and no
 circuit boards or mechanics seemed to be damaged. So it ended up in a small
 service which shouldn't cost me to much. But I am still surprised about the
 response I got after all the marketing Pentax has done on its weather
 resistance. I would believe it could be used in normal autumn weather in
 Norway, but not so.

 For those interested: It rained 3-4mm / hour which my K-7 was able to
 handle for a period of two hours. 3-4mm / hour is perhaps a lot of rain, but
 still normal where I live.

 Stig Vidar Hovland

 
 Fra: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [pdml-boun...@pdml.net] p#229; vegne av
 AlunFoto [alunf...@gmail.com]
 Sendt: 14. januar 2010 11:33
 Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 Emne: Re: PESO - Snowproofed

 Sorry to hear, Stig.
 I should perhaps add that a Canon D-7 succumbed to moisture at the
 particular landing where I took my photo. Fortunately it came back to
 life after roughly two days of drying out, but in principle it's a
 camera with about the same level of weather protection as has the K-7.
 So maybe I was lucky? At least I was deliberately pushing my luck...

 Jostein

 2010/1/14 SV Hovland p...@heime.org:

 My K-7 stopped working after two hours in rain and is currently at Pentax
 for repair which I have to pay myself. I was told by Pentax that it is not
 meant to withstand normal autumn rain in Norway for two hours. The sealing
 was meant for withstanding light rain for a short time, I was told. So from
 now on I have to treat it like its not weather proofed at all.

 Stig Vidar Hovland


 
 Fra: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [pdml-boun...@pdml.net] p#229; vegne av Jim
 King [jamesk8...@mac.com]
 Sendt: 13. januar 2010 19:25
 Til: pdml@pdml.net
 Emne: Re: PESO - Snowproofed

 A great example of K-7/DA* weatherproofing. You ought to send it to
 Pentax as a candidate for an advertisement.

 Regards, Jim

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net

Re: PESO - Snowproofed

2010-01-14 Thread Tom C
AT what I'd call a pretty good price for what it does.

Tom

On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 2:36 PM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
 http://optechusa.com/product/detail/?PRODUCT_ID=73

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
 follow the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Snowproofed

2010-01-14 Thread frank theriault
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 4:47 PM, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
 Had the PZ-1 die at a pig roast long ago.
snip

Wouldn't have happened at a veggie-bbq!

;-)

cheers,
frank

-- 
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept.  -Henri Cartier-Bresson

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Snowproofed

2010-01-14 Thread Adam Maas
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Tim Bray tb...@textuality.com wrote:
 On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote:

 The claim of any environment is the exaggeration.  If one goes below
 -10C, what about that environment, or what about extremely hot
 conditions?

 As I've mentioned here, I visit Saskatchewan every winter and always
 try to do a photowalk.  I've taken tons of pictures with both my
 *ist-D and K20 at temperatures like -35°C and never had any trouble.
 Normally, electronic circuits work just fine at arbitrarily cold
 temperatures (not necessarily when they get too hot), so I'm wondering
 if there are mechanical issues that could come into play at very cold
 temperatures.  Otherwise, why would they provide a low-temperature
 threshold?  -T


Actually cold can affect electronics just as much as heat can.
Semiconductors change behaviour with temperature and can behave
unpredictably if their operating range is exceeded in either
direction. It's not good if your semiconductors quit semiconducting.

The major difference is that cold generally does not have long-term
effects on the electronics, while heat can actually damage them
permanently.



-- 
M. Adam Maas
http://www.mawz.ca
Explorations of the City Around Us.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Snowproofed

2010-01-14 Thread Ira H. Bryant IV
On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 11:43:12 -0800
Tim Bray tb...@textuality.com wrote:
 As I've mentioned here, I visit Saskatchewan every winter and always
 try to do a photowalk.  I've taken tons of pictures with both my
 *ist-D and K20 at temperatures like -35°C and never had any trouble.
 Normally, electronic circuits work just fine at arbitrarily cold
 temperatures (not necessarily when they get too hot), so I'm wondering
 if there are mechanical issues that could come into play at very cold
 temperatures.  Otherwise, why would they provide a low-temperature
 threshold?  -T
 

It's not terribly uncommon for aircraft electronics located outside the cabin 
to fail due to a small crack in a wire. On the ground they operate normally, 
but up in the air where it is cold they fail due to contraction of the metal, 
separating the crack. Such problems can be really hard to diagnose. I imagine a 
camera could experience the same problem.

Ira


-- 
Ira Bryant
irabry...@sbcglobal.net

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: PESO - Snowproofed

2010-01-14 Thread Tom C
Funny, just like humans.  If we get too miserably cold or hot, our
circuitry starts malfunctioning as well. In general in the cold I find
I start doing stupid things, sort of like there's an open circuit,
whereas when I'm hot I'm more likely to short-circuit.

Tom

On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Ira H. Bryant IV
irabry...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
 On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 11:43:12 -0800
 Tim Bray tb...@textuality.com wrote:
 As I've mentioned here, I visit Saskatchewan every winter and always
 try to do a photowalk.  I've taken tons of pictures with both my
 *ist-D and K20 at temperatures like -35°C and never had any trouble.
 Normally, electronic circuits work just fine at arbitrarily cold
 temperatures (not necessarily when they get too hot), so I'm wondering
 if there are mechanical issues that could come into play at very cold
 temperatures.  Otherwise, why would they provide a low-temperature
 threshold?  -T


 It's not terribly uncommon for aircraft electronics located outside the cabin 
 to fail due to a small crack in a wire. On the ground they operate normally, 
 but up in the air where it is cold they fail due to contraction of the metal, 
 separating the crack. Such problems can be really hard to diagnose. I imagine 
 a camera could experience the same problem.

 Ira


 --
 Ira Bryant
 irabry...@sbcglobal.net

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


RE: PESO - Snowproofed

2010-01-14 Thread John Coyle


-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Ira H. 
Bryant IV
Sent: Friday, 15 January 2010 1:36 PM
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO - Snowproofed

On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 11:43:12 -0800
Tim Bray tb...@textuality.com wrote:
 As I've mentioned here, I visit Saskatchewan every winter and always
 try to do a photowalk.  I've taken tons of pictures with both my
 *ist-D and K20 at temperatures like -35C and never had any trouble.
 Normally, electronic circuits work just fine at arbitrarily cold
 temperatures (not necessarily when they get too hot), so I'm wondering
 if there are mechanical issues that could come into play at very cold
 temperatures.  Otherwise, why would they provide a low-temperature
 threshold?  -T
 

It's not terribly uncommon for aircraft electronics located outside the cabin 
to fail due to a small crack in a wire. On the ground they operate normally, 
but up in the air where it is cold they fail due to contraction of the metal, 
separating the crack. Such problems can be really hard to diagnose. I imagine a 
camera could experience the same problem.

Ira


-- 
Ira Bryant
irabry...@sbcglobal.net

I had a similar problem with my car's air-conditioning. A rubber O-ring joint 
was fine on inspection, but shrank on being subjected to low temperatures, thus 
breaking the seal.  Took four specialist mechanics two days to find.


John in Brisbane
-- 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Snowproofed

2010-01-14 Thread P. J. Alling

On 1/14/2010 2:43 PM, Tim Bray wrote:

On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Tom Ccaka...@gmail.com  wrote:

   

The claim of any environment is the exaggeration.  If one goes below
-10C, what about that environment, or what about extremely hot
conditions?
 

As I've mentioned here, I visit Saskatchewan every winter and always
try to do a photowalk.  I've taken tons of pictures with both my
*ist-D and K20 at temperatures like -35°C and never had any trouble.
Normally, electronic circuits work just fine at arbitrarily cold
temperatures (not necessarily when they get too hot), so I'm wondering
if there are mechanical issues that could come into play at very cold
temperatures.  Otherwise, why would they provide a low-temperature
threshold?  -T
   
The battery is really the week link in these cameras at very cold 
temperatures.  I expect that there wouldn't be enough juice to actuate 
the shutter before it was cold enought to actually affect the shutter.



--
{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1033{\fonttbl{\f0\fnil\fcharset0 Courier 
New;}}
\viewkind4\uc1\pard\f0\fs20 I've just upgraded to Thunderbird 3.0 and the 
interface subtly weird.\par
}


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


PESO - Snowproofed

2010-01-13 Thread AlunFoto
Another tribute to Pentax weather protection.
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/displayimage.php?pos=-226
One K-7 photographed with another K-7.
Both cameras worked without a single glitch for the 4-5 hours we were ashore.
Nor was there any hiccups after returning to the indoors.

Oh, and the Metz performed impeccably too.

Jostein

-- 
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Snowproofed

2010-01-13 Thread P. J. Alling

Yes, the camera and lens are sealed, but I fear for the flash...

On 1/13/2010 12:00 PM, AlunFoto wrote:

Another tribute to Pentax weather protection.
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/displayimage.php?pos=-226
One K-7 photographed with another K-7.
Both cameras worked without a single glitch for the 4-5 hours we were ashore.
Nor was there any hiccups after returning to the indoors.

Oh, and the Metz performed impeccably too.

Jostein

   



--
{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1033{\fonttbl{\f0\fnil\fcharset0 Courier 
New;}}
\viewkind4\uc1\pard\f0\fs20 I've just upgraded to Thunderbird 3.0 and the 
interface subtly weird.\par
}


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Snowproofed

2010-01-13 Thread David J Brooks
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 12:10 PM, P. J. Alling
webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
 Yes, the camera and lens are sealed, but I fear for the flash...

If only there were more like you.:-)

Dave

 On 1/13/2010 12:00 PM, AlunFoto wrote:

 Another tribute to Pentax weather protection.
 http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/displayimage.php?pos=-226
 One K-7 photographed with another K-7.
 Both cameras worked without a single glitch for the 4-5 hours we were
 ashore.
 Nor was there any hiccups after returning to the indoors.

 Oh, and the Metz performed impeccably too.

 Jostein




 --
 {\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1033{\fonttbl{\f0\fnil\fcharset0
 Courier New;}}
 \viewkind4\uc1\pard\f0\fs20 I've just upgraded to Thunderbird 3.0 and the
 interface subtly weird.\par
 }


 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
 follow the directions.




-- 
Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
York Region, Ontario, Canada

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Snowproofed

2010-01-13 Thread Jim King



AlunFoto wrote Wed, 13 Jan 2010 09:00:54 -0800


Another tribute to Pentax weather protection.
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/displayimage.php?pos=-226
One K-7 photographed with another K-7.
Both cameras worked without a single glitch for the 4-5 hours we  
were ashore.

Nor was there any hiccups after returning to the indoors.

Oh, and the Metz performed impeccably too.


A great example of K-7/DA* weatherproofing.  You ought to send it to  
Pentax as a candidate for an advertisement.


Regards, Jim

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Snowproofed

2010-01-13 Thread Charles Robinson
On Jan 13, 2010, at 12:25, Jim King wrote:
 
 AlunFoto wrote Wed, 13 Jan 2010 09:00:54 -0800
 
 Another tribute to Pentax weather protection.
 http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/displayimage.php?pos=-226
 One K-7 photographed with another K-7.
 Both cameras worked without a single glitch for the 4-5 hours we were ashore.
 Nor was there any hiccups after returning to the indoors.
 
 Oh, and the Metz performed impeccably too.
 
 A great example of K-7/DA* weatherproofing.  You ought to send it to Pentax 
 as a candidate for an advertisement.
 

Wonder if they'd mind a non-Pentax (Metz?) flash on the top there...

 -Charles

--
Charles Robinson - charl...@visi.com
Minneapolis, MN
http://charles.robinsontwins.org
http://www.facebook.com/charles.robinson


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Snowproofed

2010-01-13 Thread Joseph McAllister
Nice candidate for a Pentax ad if you could get one of those beast to  
sit up and smile.



On Jan 13, 2010, at 09:00 , AlunFoto wrote:


Another tribute to Pentax weather protection.
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/displayimage.php?pos=-226
One K-7 photographed with another K-7.
Both cameras worked without a single glitch for the 4-5 hours we  
were ashore.

Nor was there any hiccups after returning to the indoors.


Joseph McAllister
Pentaxian

http://gallery.me.com/jomac
http://web.me.com/jomac/show.me/Blog/Blog.html


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Snowproofed

2010-01-13 Thread John Francis
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 12:30:59PM -0600, Charles Robinson wrote:
 On Jan 13, 2010, at 12:25, Jim King wrote:
  
  AlunFoto wrote Wed, 13 Jan 2010 09:00:54 -0800
  
  Another tribute to Pentax weather protection.
  http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/displayimage.php?pos=-226
  One K-7 photographed with another K-7.
  Both cameras worked without a single glitch for the 4-5 hours we were 
  ashore.
  Nor was there any hiccups after returning to the indoors.
  
  Oh, and the Metz performed impeccably too.
  
  A great example of K-7/DA* weatherproofing.  You ought to send it to Pentax 
  as a candidate for an advertisement.
  
 
 Wonder if they'd mind a non-Pentax (Metz?) flash on the top there...
 
  -Charles

That was exactly what I thought (both the suggestion for use as an ad,
and the afterthought that it would have been better with an AF 540).

Still a pretty impressive testimonial, though.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Snowproofed

2010-01-13 Thread eactivist


In a message dated 1/13/2010 9:00:55 A.M.  Pacific Standard Time, 
alunf...@gmail.com writes:
Another tribute to Pentax  weather  protection.
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/displayimage.php?pos=-226
One  K-7 photographed with another K-7.
Both cameras worked without a single  glitch for the 4-5 hours we were 
ashore.
Nor was there any hiccups after  returning to the indoors.

Oh, and the Metz performed impeccably  too.

Jostein


That's pretty cool.

Marnie  aka Doe :-)

-
We can't  solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we 
created them.  Albert Einstein  


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Snowproofed

2010-01-13 Thread Jack Davis
Nice endorsement for Metz also. ;)

Jack

--- On Wed, 1/13/10, Joseph McAllister pentax...@mac.com wrote:

 From: Joseph McAllister pentax...@mac.com
 Subject: Re: PESO - Snowproofed
 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
 Date: Wednesday, January 13, 2010, 10:31 AM
 Nice candidate for a Pentax ad if you
 could get one of those beast to sit up and smile.
 
 
 On Jan 13, 2010, at 09:00 , AlunFoto wrote:
 
  Another tribute to Pentax weather protection.
  http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/displayimage.php?pos=-226
  One K-7 photographed with another K-7.
  Both cameras worked without a single glitch for the
 4-5 hours we were ashore.
  Nor was there any hiccups after returning to the
 indoors.
 
 Joseph McAllister
 Pentaxian
 
 http://gallery.me.com/jomac
 http://web.me.com/jomac/show.me/Blog/Blog.html
 
 
 --PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
 directly above and follow the directions.
 


  

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Snowproofed

2010-01-13 Thread John Sessoms

From: Charles Robinson

On Jan 13, 2010, at 12:25, Jim King wrote:
 
 AlunFoto wrote Wed, 13 Jan 2010 09:00:54 -0800
 

 Another tribute to Pentax weather protection.
 http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/displayimage.php?pos=-226
 One K-7 photographed with another K-7.
 Both cameras worked without a single glitch for the 4-5 hours we were ashore.
 Nor was there any hiccups after returning to the indoors.
 
 Oh, and the Metz performed impeccably too.
 
 A great example of K-7/DA* weatherproofing.  You ought to send it to Pentax as a candidate for an advertisement.
 


Wonder if they'd mind a non-Pentax (Metz?) flash on the top there...


Wouldn't take much PhotoShop to turn it into a Pentax flash.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Snowproofed

2010-01-13 Thread frank theriault
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 12:00 PM, AlunFoto alunf...@gmail.com wrote:
 Another tribute to Pentax weather protection.
 http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/displayimage.php?pos=-226
 One K-7 photographed with another K-7.
 Both cameras worked without a single glitch for the 4-5 hours we were ashore.
 Nor was there any hiccups after returning to the indoors.

 Oh, and the Metz performed impeccably too.

Impressive photo!

cheers,
frank

-- 
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept.  -Henri Cartier-Bresson

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Snowproofed

2010-01-13 Thread SV Hovland
My K-7 stopped working after two hours in rain and is currently at Pentax for 
repair which I have to pay myself. I was told by Pentax that it is not meant to 
withstand normal autumn rain in Norway for two hours. The sealing was meant for 
withstanding light rain for a short time, I was told. So from now on I have to 
treat it like its not weather proofed at all.

Stig Vidar Hovland



Fra: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [pdml-boun...@pdml.net] p#229; vegne av Jim King 
[jamesk8...@mac.com]
Sendt: 13. januar 2010 19:25
Til: pdml@pdml.net
Emne: Re: PESO - Snowproofed

A great example of K-7/DA* weatherproofing.  You ought to send it to
Pentax as a candidate for an advertisement.

Regards, Jim
-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.