Re: RE: PESO -- a proper portrait - Jocelyn

2006-10-04 Thread Mike Hamilton
Thanks, Tim.  Jocelyn is not a model by any means.  She's my
girlfriend, and my frequent subject for class assignments. :)  I was
completeing an assignment on window lighting.

I was using the A50/1.7 at 5.6 and 1/200s.

Mike

On 10/4/06, Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 A fine portrait IMO. I like the light and the pose. She seems comfortable
 with situation.
 Is she a pro model? I'm just curious about the situation of the shoot.

 BTW: What lens and what stop?


 Tim
 Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike
 Hamilton
 Sent: 3. oktober 2006 01:50
 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 Subject: PESO -- a proper portrait - Jocelyn

 http://www.michaelhamilton.ca/images/jocelynshort5-1window.jpg

 I've been taking a portraiture course through my local community
 college.  This was for an assignment.  I was using window light only.
 I have other shots using off-camera flash as a fill, but this was by
 far the best photo of the session.

 :)

 Any tips?  comments?  Thanks.
 mike
 --
 Remember to Breathe -- MichaelHamilton.ca

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net




 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net



-- 
--
Remember to Breathe -- MichaelHamilton.ca

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


RE: PESO -- a proper portrait - Jocelyn

2006-10-04 Thread Tim Øsleby
A fine portrait IMO. I like the light and the pose. She seems comfortable
with situation. 
Is she a pro model? I'm just curious about the situation of the shoot. 

BTW: What lens and what stop?


Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike
Hamilton
Sent: 3. oktober 2006 01:50
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: PESO -- a proper portrait - Jocelyn

http://www.michaelhamilton.ca/images/jocelynshort5-1window.jpg

I've been taking a portraiture course through my local community
college.  This was for an assignment.  I was using window light only.
I have other shots using off-camera flash as a fill, but this was by
far the best photo of the session.

:)

Any tips?  comments?  Thanks.
mike
--
Remember to Breathe -- MichaelHamilton.ca

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net




-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: PESO -- a proper portrait - Jocelyn

2006-10-03 Thread David J Brooks
Nice job.

Which college are you doing this at Mike. I'v been looking for years.

Dave

Quoting Mike Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 http://www.michaelhamilton.ca/images/jocelynshort5-1window.jpg

 I've been taking a portraiture course through my local community
 college.  This was for an assignment.  I was using window light only.
 I have other shots using off-camera flash as a fill, but this was by
 far the best photo of the session.

 :)

 Any tips?  comments?  Thanks.
 mike
 --
 Remember to Breathe -- MichaelHamilton.ca

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net




Equine Photography in York Region

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Re: PESO -- a proper portrait - Jocelyn

2006-10-03 Thread Mike Hamilton
Metro Community College in Edmonton.  Peter Sellers is the instructor.
 He's realy good  at teaching, as well as Photography.  I've really
enjoyed it.

Mike

On 10/3/06, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Nice job.

 Which college are you doing this at Mike. I'v been looking for years.

 Dave

 Quoting Mike Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

  http://www.michaelhamilton.ca/images/jocelynshort5-1window.jpg
 
  I've been taking a portraiture course through my local community
  college.  This was for an assignment.  I was using window light only.
  I have other shots using off-camera flash as a fill, but this was by
  far the best photo of the session.
 
  :)
 
  Any tips?  comments?  Thanks.
  mike
  --
  Remember to Breathe -- MichaelHamilton.ca
 
  --
  PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
  PDML@pdml.net
  http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 



 Equine Photography in York Region

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net



-- 
--
Remember to Breathe -- MichaelHamilton.ca

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Re: PESO -- a proper portrait - Jocelyn

2006-10-03 Thread David J Brooks
Oh, i thought you were in Ontario, sorry.

Which accent is Paeter using.;-)

Dave

Quoting Mike Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Metro Community College in Edmonton.  Peter Sellers is the instructor.
  He's realy good  at teaching, as well as Photography.  I've really
 enjoyed it.

 Mike

 On 10/3/06, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Nice job.

 Which college are you doing this at Mike. I'v been looking for years.

 Dave

 Quoting Mike Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

  http://www.michaelhamilton.ca/images/jocelynshort5-1window.jpg
 
  I've been taking a portraiture course through my local community
  college.  This was for an assignment.  I was using window light only.
  I have other shots using off-camera flash as a fill, but this was by
  far the best photo of the session.
 
  :)
 
  Any tips?  comments?  Thanks.
  mike
  --
  Remember to Breathe -- MichaelHamilton.ca
 
  --
  PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
  PDML@pdml.net
  http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 



 Equine Photography in York Region

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net



 --
 --
 Remember to Breathe -- MichaelHamilton.ca

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net




Equine Photography in York Region

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Re: PESO -- a proper portrait - Jocelyn

2006-10-03 Thread David Savage
Bluebottle.

Dave

On 10/3/06, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Oh, i thought you were in Ontario, sorry.

 Which accent is Paeter using.;-)

 Dave

 Quoting Mike Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

  Metro Community College in Edmonton.  Peter Sellers is the instructor.
   He's realy good  at teaching, as well as Photography.  I've really
  enjoyed it.
 
  Mike
 
  On 10/3/06, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Nice job.
 
  Which college are you doing this at Mike. I'v been looking for years.
 
  Dave
 
  Quoting Mike Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 
   http://www.michaelhamilton.ca/images/jocelynshort5-1window.jpg
  
   I've been taking a portraiture course through my local community
   college.  This was for an assignment.  I was using window light only.
   I have other shots using off-camera flash as a fill, but this was by
   far the best photo of the session.
  
   :)
  
   Any tips?  comments?  Thanks.
   mike

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Re: PESO -- a proper portrait - Jocelyn

2006-10-03 Thread frank theriault
On 10/2/06, Mike Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 I've since taken everyone's suggestions to heart and sharpened the
 eyes a bit to bring them out.  I also reduced the appearance of the
 labret scar.  Sadly, there was no PS tool to raise the height of my
 camera in relation to the subject... ;)


I generally like it a lot - it's far better than I could do (I'm no
portraitist).  One thing that I thought when I first looked at it is
that the eyes seemed unnaturally sharp, at least compared to the rest
of her face.  I thought I'd look down the thread to see what others
had to say about it, and I now see that you sharpened the eyes.

While I agree that the eyes must be what one focuses on in such
formal portraiture, to me this makes it look a tad contrived.  Were
the eyes actually sharp, I'd be saying that I'd prefer an ever so
slightly wider dof than you had.

Keep in mind that I'm really picking at nits here, and that overall
it's a lovely shot of a beautiful woman.

Well done!

cheers,
frank
-- 
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept.  -Henri Cartier-Bresson

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: PESO -- a proper portrait - Jocelyn

2006-10-02 Thread Rick Womer
It looks to me as though the plane of focus takes in
her bangs and the tip of her nose, rather than her
eyes.  Otherwise, very nice.

Rick

--- Mike Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


http://www.michaelhamilton.ca/images/jocelynshort5-1window.jpg
 
 I've been taking a portraiture course through my
 local community
 college.  This was for an assignment.  I was using
 window light only.
 I have other shots using off-camera flash as a fill,
 but this was by
 far the best photo of the session.
 
 :)
 
 Any tips?  comments?  Thanks.
 mike
 --
 Remember to Breathe -- MichaelHamilton.ca
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 


http://www.photo.net/photos/RickW

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: PESO -- a proper portrait - Jocelyn

2006-10-02 Thread Bruce Dayton
Interesting title.  I suppose there are improper portraits, then
grin?

Available light is always something wonderful.  Even though I must use
flash many times, the directional available light, such as you had,
can be great to work with.  That being said, this light seems just a
little strong - based on viewing her shoulder near the scarf.  For the
future, it would be good to try to diffuse the light just a little
more.

Where the light and shadows fall is good and shows her face off pretty
well.  Biggest tip to give you is to shoot a lot and experiment with
the light.  Good start here.

-- 
Best regards,
Bruce


Monday, October 2, 2006, 4:50:17 PM, you wrote:

MH http://www.michaelhamilton.ca/images/jocelynshort5-1window.jpg

MH I've been taking a portraiture course through my local community
MH college.  This was for an assignment.  I was using window light only.
MH I have other shots using off-camera flash as a fill, but this was by
MH far the best photo of the session.

MH :)

MH Any tips?  comments?  Thanks.
MH mike
MH --
MH Remember to Breathe -- MichaelHamilton.ca




-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: PESO -- a proper portrait - Jocelyn

2006-10-02 Thread Christian
Mike Hamilton wrote:
 http://www.michaelhamilton.ca/images/jocelynshort5-1window.jpg
 
 I've been taking a portraiture course through my local community
 college.  This was for an assignment.  I was using window light only.
 I have other shots using off-camera flash as a fill, but this was by
 far the best photo of the session.
 
 :)
 
 Any tips?  comments?  Thanks.
 mike
 --
 Remember to Breathe -- MichaelHamilton.ca
 

Next time let her keep the labret in (I'm assuming I see the hole just 
below the lower lip?)  Otherwise a nice subject makes for a nice 
portrait. :-)

-- 

Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: PESO -- a proper portrait - Jocelyn

2006-10-02 Thread William Robb

- Original Message - 
From: Mike Hamilton
Subject: PESO -- a proper portrait - Jocelyn


 http://www.michaelhamilton.ca/images/jocelynshort5-1window.jpg

 I've been taking a portraiture course through my local community
 college.  This was for an assignment.  I was using window light only.
 I have other shots using off-camera flash as a fill, but this was by
 far the best photo of the session.

 :)

 Any tips?  comments?  Thanks.

I like a somewhat heigher camera angle than what you shot. I generally 
try to put the lens axis at about the same level as the eyes.

William Robb 



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


RE: PESO -- a proper portrait - Jocelyn

2006-10-02 Thread Shel Belinkoff
Hello,

Did you use auto focus on this shot?  The focus seems to a bit forward of
her eyes.  Auto focus or manual, y'gotta get the eyes in focus.

Her head is at an awkward angle, the lighting is very good.  Framing might
be improved with some cropping and trimming.

Why is this a proper portrait?

Shel



 [Original Message]
 From: Mike Hamilton 

 http://www.michaelhamilton.ca/images/jocelynshort5-1window.jpg

 I've been taking a portraiture course through my local community
 college.  This was for an assignment.  I was using window light only.
 I have other shots using off-camera flash as a fill, but this was by
 far the best photo of the session.

 :)

 Any tips?  comments?  Thanks.



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Re: PESO -- a proper portrait - Jocelyn

2006-10-02 Thread Mike Hamilton
On 10/2/06, Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Next time let her keep the labret in (I'm assuming I see the hole just
 below the lower lip?)  Otherwise a nice subject makes for a nice
 portrait. :-)


Sadly, the dot in her lower lip is a scar from the labret piercing -
it's no longer a hole.

Thanks :)

Mike
--
Remember to Breathe -- MichaelHamilton.ca

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: RE: PESO -- a proper portrait - Jocelyn

2006-10-02 Thread Mike Hamilton
On 10/2/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hello,
 Did you use auto focus on this shot?  The focus seems to a bit forward of
 her eyes.  Auto focus or manual, y'gotta get the eyes in focus.

Ok, thanks.  It was actually manual focus (Pentax A 50/1.7).


 Her head is at an awkward angle, the lighting is very good.  Framing might
 be improved with some cropping and trimming.

The photo is cropped as-is.  What are you suggesting that I adjust?

 Why is this a proper portrait?


Well, that was kind of a tongue-in-cheek comment about the responses I
got on my last portrait where the subject's face wasn't the prime
subject of the photo.

Thanks, Shel.
mike
--
Remember to Breathe -- MichaelHamilton.ca

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Re: PESO -- a proper portrait - Jocelyn

2006-10-02 Thread Mike Hamilton
On 10/2/06, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I like a somewhat heigher camera angle than what you shot. I generally
 try to put the lens axis at about the same level as the eyes.


Hah.  You and my instructor both!!!  He mentioned that explicitly, and
I'm sure he's going to give me heck over it.  Oh well.

Thanks! :)

Mike
--
Remember to Breathe -- MichaelHamilton.ca

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: PESO -- a proper portrait - Jocelyn

2006-10-02 Thread Eactivist
In a message dated 10/2/2006 4:52:56 PM Pacific Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://www.michaelhamilton.ca/images/jocelynshort5-1window.jpg

I've been taking a portraiture course through my local community
college.  This was for an assignment.  I was using window light only.
I have other shots using off-camera flash as a fill, but this was by
far the best photo of the session.

:)

Any tips?  comments?  Thanks.
mike
=
I took a portraiture class at a local darkroom place about 1 1/2-2 years ago. 
We only used studio lights, not natural light.

I think this is pretty darn good, in my opinion. Don't know enough to offer 
detailed suggestions about lighting, etc.

Nice going.

Marnie aka Doe 

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Re: PESO -- a proper portrait - Jocelyn

2006-10-02 Thread Mike Hamilton
On 10/2/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I took a portraiture class at a local darkroom place about 1 1/2-2 years ago.
 We only used studio lights, not natural light.

 I think this is pretty darn good, in my opinion. Don't know enough to offer
 detailed suggestions about lighting, etc.

 Nice going.

Thanks a lot!

I've since taken everyone's suggestions to heart and sharpened the
eyes a bit to bring them out.  I also reduced the appearance of the
labret scar.  Sadly, there was no PS tool to raise the height of my
camera in relation to the subject... ;)

Thanks!
Mike
--
Remember to Breathe -- MichaelHamilton.ca

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: PESO -- a proper portrait - Jocelyn

2006-10-02 Thread Kenneth Waller
Very nice!
Nice subject, pose  lighting.

If it were mine I'd crop out everything below the horizontal part of the 
scarf - somewhat distracting IMHO.

Kenneth Waller

- Original Message - 
From: Mike Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO -- a proper portrait - Jocelyn


 http://www.michaelhamilton.ca/images/jocelynshort5-1window.jpg

 I've been taking a portraiture course through my local community
 college.  This was for an assignment.  I was using window light only.
 I have other shots using off-camera flash as a fill, but this was by
 far the best photo of the session.

 :)

 Any tips?  comments?  Thanks.
 mike
 --
 Remember to Breathe -- MichaelHamilton.ca

 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: PESO -- a proper portrait - Jocelyn

2006-10-02 Thread Eactivist
In a message dated 10/2/2006 8:26:00 PM Pacific Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've since taken everyone's suggestions to heart and sharpened the
eyes a bit to bring them out.  I also reduced the appearance of the
labret scar.  Sadly, there was no PS tool to raise the height of my
camera in relation to the subject... ;)
=
BTW, Mike, another thought. 

Our instructor (a BW guy who had done a LOT of photography, and I thought he 
was pretty darn good), said take women from slightly above and men from 
slightly below. Can't remember if that was from slightly above eye level or top 
of 
head or what. Probably eye level.

He said it plays into our traditional expectation that men are taller and 
women are shorter. I really questioned him about that quite a bit because it 
sounded kind of, cough, sort of sexist to me.

But he said if it is reversed it always seems to bother people -- maybe just 
on a subconscious level if they don't really consciously it -- because it goes 
against expectations. So he's found it's just better to do it that way and 
not go against expectations. IE. People aren't bothered. When he put it like 
that, I sort of bought it.

Anyway, that may come into play here. Don't know about the eye focus thing, I 
didn't look at your photo that hard, but think about the rest.

HTH, Marnie aka Doe :-)

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Re: PESO -- a proper portrait - Jocelyn

2006-10-02 Thread Mike Hamilton
That is good information, Marnie.  Thanks.  My instructor told us the
same thing, unless we're going for a powerful look to the subject.
I had to keep reminding myself to stay above Jocelyn (*ahem*).  It
turns out that I forgot for this photo.

Perhaps I'm subconsciously positioning her as the more powerful role
in our relationship.  :)

Thanks again for your thoughts.
Mike

On 10/2/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 In a message dated 10/2/2006 8:26:00 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 I've since taken everyone's suggestions to heart and sharpened the
 eyes a bit to bring them out.  I also reduced the appearance of the
 labret scar.  Sadly, there was no PS tool to raise the height of my
 camera in relation to the subject... ;)
 =
 BTW, Mike, another thought.

 Our instructor (a BW guy who had done a LOT of photography, and I thought he
 was pretty darn good), said take women from slightly above and men from
 slightly below. Can't remember if that was from slightly above eye level or 
 top of
 head or what. Probably eye level.

 He said it plays into our traditional expectation that men are taller and
 women are shorter. I really questioned him about that quite a bit because it
 sounded kind of, cough, sort of sexist to me.

 But he said if it is reversed it always seems to bother people -- maybe just
 on a subconscious level if they don't really consciously it -- because it goes
 against expectations. So he's found it's just better to do it that way and
 not go against expectations. IE. People aren't bothered. When he put it like
 that, I sort of bought it.

 Anyway, that may come into play here. Don't know about the eye focus thing, I
 didn't look at your photo that hard, but think about the rest.

 HTH, Marnie aka Doe :-)

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net



-- 
--
Remember to Breathe -- MichaelHamilton.ca

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net