Re: Americana discussion

1999-01-22 Thread ignitor

At 11:19 PM 1/21/1999 -0500, you wrote:


There's a *really* good question: what's the difference between Retro and
Timeless?

-- Mike Woods


Retro is a fad that eventually fades...then fads.then fades

Timeless.just keeps on...well, you know...has to do with a pink rabbit g


-Chris 



RE: Americana discussion

1999-01-22 Thread Nicholas Petti



 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rik Collins
 Sent: Thursday, January 21, 1999 10:12 AM
 To: passenger side
 Subject: Re: Americana discussion

 I remember when I had my first beer.
 
 rik

If you can remember the first one you haven't had enough.
Nicholas
 



Re: Blastered comp (was: Re: Americana discussion)

1999-01-21 Thread Christopher M Knaus

Hey there,

alt.country poster boy JW
Sure, there's a f*cking  review on the f*cking Twangzine if you 
people would ever bother to read the f*cking thing. g

I cant get at it with 'NetNanny' in the way.

Later...
CK
___
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com/getjuno.html
or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]



Re: Americana discussion

1999-01-21 Thread \Doug Young aka \\\The Iceman\\\\



[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Rik makes  a couple of  points that really bug me: It's all relative and
 transitional at best because in 5-10 years these tunes we listen to now
 will be gathering dust in some used CD section of your local Media Play.

 Please tell me why this is a good thing. Rik, have you listened to country
 radio lately? Do you know the dreck that the "big boys" are foisting on the
 public? Can you honestly say that "these tunes we listen to now" aren't
 more interesting and just plain better than that fluff? Why shouldn't more
 people hear them, then?
 Remember there's always the delete key. g
 Jim, smilin'

Looking over my play lists and what I also play at home, there is very little
if anything 10 to 15 years old that came out of the "Trashville School of
Music" that I still listen to.  However, I stll regularly play off of the Uncle
Tupelo releases, Blood Oranges, Rank  File, Lone Justice, Robert Earl Keen,
Rusty Wier, etc.  The so called outlaw and alt-country stuff is still worth
listening to.  It doesn't date and it's not schlock.  I would imagine some of
this will still be wonderful long after Garth Brooks and his ilk have been
forgotten.

Iceman



RE: Americana discussion

1999-01-21 Thread Jon Weisberger

Geez, if you don't listen to any country music from 10 or 15 years ago,
you're missing George Strait, Ricky Skaggs, Merle Haggard, Don Williams,
Ricky Van Shelton, Conway Twitty, the Judds, John Anderson, Keith Whitley,
Clint Black, Patty Loveless, Randy Travis, and a whole lot more.

As far as the general Americana discussion goes, an issue that hasn't yet
been addressed is this: what's going to happen when - ok, make that "if" -
the core of mainstream country radio decides that its commercially viable
path is to concentrate on retaining or winning back the core of the country
music audience?  If the format's defined only in contrast or opposition to
the commercial mainstream, and the mainstream changes, where does that leave
Americana?  From my perspective, there's no inherent reason why a fair
number of presently-excluded country artists like Heather Myles, or Dwight
Yoakam, or Connie Smith, or a bunch of others who are charting or have
charted on Americana couldn't be part of a more hardcore, yet still
commercially viable country format that didn't include all, or very much at
all of the rock-based stuff, and some good reasons (like musical similarity)
why they could be.  If that happens, what's the point of an Americana chart?

Jon Weisberger  Kenton County, KY [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.fuse.net/jonweisberger/



RE: Americana discussion

1999-01-21 Thread Jim_Caligiuri




Re: Americana discussion

1999-01-21 Thread Ndubb


  

But how do you know that what sounds good today *is* gonna sound good ten
years from now? Does this mean you sidestep everything that includes any sort
of trendy touches, be they in instrumentation or production value? That would
be a bummer. That, to me, eliminates some really great music. Like Beck and
Nirvana, to name two. (Likely bad examples for this *country* discussion, but
what the hell.) Maybe the two best, most important rock artists of the decade
who owe plenty in sound to the decade. Does that mean they aren't great? I
don't think so. 

I'm curious to know what you think about retro acts like Wayne Hancock and the
Derailers. Do you like 'em? Would you call them timeless? 

Just jawin',

Neal Weiss



Re: Americana discussion

1999-01-21 Thread Rik Collins

On 21 Jan 99 at 21:39, Budrocket wrote:

Date:  Thu, 21 Jan 1999 21:39:40 -0500
Reply-to:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From:  Budrocket [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:"passenger side" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:   Americana discussion
X-To:  postcard2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Is it really necessary to toss around all the expletives in=20
these discussions. Your passion is understandable but is
f*%$ this and that really required to make a point. I would
argue that if kids are a focus to turn on to americana you
might not be the one to lead the way.=20

FUCK, man, you're right.  Shit, I'm fucking sorry, really I am.

Fucky
Fuck Rockets

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  =
*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *
 Buddy Woodward  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   THE GHOST ROCKETS - "Maximum Rhythm  Bluegrass"
 http://www.hudsonet.com/~undertow/ghostrockets
*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  =
*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *=20
I remember when I had my first beer.

rik



Re: Americana discussion

1999-01-21 Thread Rik Collins

On 21 Jan 99 at 20:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Date:  Thu, 21 Jan 1999 20:16:30 EST
Reply-to:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:"passenger side" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:   Re: Americana discussion


  

But how do you know that what sounds good today *is* gonna sound good ten
years from now? Does this mean you sidestep everything that includes any sort
of trendy touches, be they in instrumentation or production value? That would
be a bummer. That, to me, eliminates some really great music. Like Beck and
Nirvana, to name two. (Likely bad examples for this *country* discussion, but
what the hell.) Maybe the two best, most important rock artists of the decade
who owe plenty in sound to the decade. Does that mean they aren't great? I
don't think so. 

I'm curious to know what you think about retro acts like Wayne Hancock and the
Derailers. Do you like 'em? Would you call them timeless? 

Just jawin',

Neal Weiss

Neal,

Met Wayne at an appearance at a club in Rochester NY
on June 11 1998. In a word the best 3 hour non stop show
I ever saw. He just sang,no break, 3 song encore and Evan 
Johns was playing guitar with him on that tour. My brother
and I got there early and introduced ourselves to him, chatted,
and without a doubt one of the best performers and nicest
guys around today.

The club had a poster advertising his appearance and was
able to procure 2 of them. All the members of the band signed
and it is one of the neatest momentos of any event I have 
ever attended.

Derailers without a doubt one of the best groups today. Can't
wait to add their 4th release to my CD's. Do you know whats
going on with them?

Both display timeless quality in their music. Trends come and
go but both these artists take distinct genres of music(Waynes
affection for big band and Hank Williams) and the Derailers
Bakersfield sounding style, put a 90's twist to them and introduce
a whole new audience to the particular styles. Both  keepers.

I tend to gravitate against the trends of the times except that the
swing thing got me. Nice to hear it all again but with a lot of fresh
faces and varying styles. 

thanks for the insight,

rik 



Re: Americana discussion

1999-01-21 Thread Mike Woods



On Thu, 21 Jan 1999, Neal Weiss [I think] wrote:

 I'm curious to know what you think about retro acts like Wayne Hancock and the
 Derailers. Do you like 'em? Would you call them timeless? 

There's a *really* good question: what's the difference between Retro and
Timeless?

-- Mike Woods




Re: Americana discussion

1999-01-20 Thread Mike Hays

rik writes:
Just had the chance to hear
Cisco at the music store I work at and distinctly Bakersfield influenced.
I heard Buck Owens riffs and a general Bakersfield feel(if thats possible)
and would recommend it to anyone who likes that aspect of "Americana"

I have to second the Cisco CD which I got today and have chosen tracks for
TwangCast.  As far as the rest of the post,  Less Garth = good,  however a
bit of Garth goes a long way as a point of reference for the Nashville
scene,  more sharing of new artists = good, but I find the posts that are
business related and in discussion of the genre as a business very
interesting and informative and while I realize that not everyone on the
list is in the biz,  enough are to make it a vital part of the discussions
herein.
@$% - Don't get your shorts in a wedgie over that, it's just the way that
hillbilly talks, coming from the Volunteer school of all things twang he ran
into some mighty , shall we say, colorful characters along the way and well,
if you add that to a nearly full career in the worlds biggest trash talk
organization, well...you catch my driftg
Mike Hays
np: Countrypolitans

NOW ONLINE,   www.TwangCast.com  TM  RealCountry netcast 24 X 7
Please Visit Then let us know what you think!

Mike Hays www.MikeHays.RealCountry.net
For the best country artist web hosting, www.RealCountry.net




Re: Americana discussion

1999-01-20 Thread Jim_Caligiuri

Rik makes  a couple of  points that really bug me: It's all relative and
transitional at best because in 5-10 years these tunes we listen to now
will be gathering dust in some used CD section of your local Media Play.

Please tell me why this is a good thing. Rik, have you listened to country
radio lately? Do you know the dreck that the "big boys" are foisting on the
public? Can you honestly say that "these tunes we listen to now" aren't
more interesting and just plain better than that fluff? Why shouldn't more
people hear them, then?

Do we have anything better to do than postulate in perpetuity about the
sales figures and format names of something that is a $14.99 retail
investment. What's the deal with the infatuation with sales figures and
getting heard.

I never said anything about sales figures, at least directly. I see no
reason to NOT want this music to be heard by as many people as possible. If
you agree the music is good, why shouldn't you be glad to turn other people
on to it? and 15 bucks, to some people, is a lot for maybe 40 minutes of
what's supposed to be entertainment.

Remember there's always the delete key. g
Jim, smilin'




Blastered comp (was: Re: Americana discussion)

1999-01-20 Thread Ameritwang


Rik wrote:

Also, if you haven't gotten around to picking up the VA-Blastered 
tribute CD by all means do so. Personally hadn't heard of several
of the artists on the CD but the thrill of discovering new artists like
The Grandsons,Last Train Home,  Highway 13 is the reason why
"Americana" is so interesting.

Has this been discussed? Was I sleeping? Using my "delete" finger liberally
that week?

Can I hear some details on this? (artists/label/etc.)

and finally, is the "Highway 13" on that disc the *same* Highway 13 from
Pittsburgh?

Inquiring minds want to know...(ok, that's a lie...only *I* want to know)

Paul

np: Mike Watt - Ball Hog or Tug Boat?



Re: Americana discussion

1999-01-20 Thread Jeff Wall

At 03:50 PM 1/20/99 -0500, you wrote:
Is it really necessary to toss around all the expletives in 
these discussions.

No, it's not really necessary, but we all have our little faults. Yates is
a folkie, Cantwell is a midget, Weisberger loves Garth, and I cuss. But I
guess I did go overboard this time 2 shits, 3 fucks, and a goddamned. If I
was Catholic, I guess I would be gargeling with Holy Water while
simultainously saying Hail Mary's. Thank God I'm Baptist, Backsliding
Baptist at that. The Ass and Pussy don't really count as being obscene
because as the Nashville Princess's have stated numerous times, All of us
WGWG (White Guy's With Glasses) are pussies.

Your passion is understandable but is
f*%$ this and that really required to make a point. 

No, not at all. But when I'm really tired and I post, The words just come
out without any conscious thought. I just type the words in my head without
running them thru anytype of "Is this appropriate?" "Is this going to
offend" types of filters.


I would
argue that if kids are a focus to turn on to americana you
might not be the one to lead the way. 

Hate to tell all of y'all this, but if y'all are counting on me or my words
to be the Alt Country Poster Boy, you people are in serious need of a CAT
scan. I don;t have the desire to be the representative of anything. As for
the kids fuck em. When they can learn to pull their goddamned pants up
so they ain't hanging off their asses, and when they learn that a thumper
stereo destroys good music (ever try to listen to Bill Monroe or the
Stanleys through a Thumper Stereo), then maybe I'll start to believe that
they have enough common sense to be worth saving. The whole tied died, body
pierced, weird hair, goofy pants hanging down off their ass bunch of them.

BTW, you mention Jeffrey Renz Country Standard Time magazine and the fact
that it does not suck. I have to agree with you. His magazine does not
suck, although IN MY OPINION ONLY, he covers too much music that DOES suck.
(BTW, He thinks that *I* suck, he's probably right) Other magazines that
don't suck terribly bad that you might be interested in would be Peter
Blackstocks No Depression. ND doesn't suck although I've accused Peter of
sucking a time or two. Just when I get up a full head of steam, he does
something nice like drop me an e-mail. THAT'S WHY HE SUCKS. HE AIN'T EVEN
DECENT ENOUGH TO BE AN ASSHOLE! What kind of editor is that? Those Miles of
Music guys have them up a webzine that doesn't suck either. In fact, the
only sucking that goes on there is Jeff Weiss sucking the money out of your
pockets. Besides, I secretly have a crush on the entire Weiss family, Jeff,
Neal, and Corrie. If I asked them to adopt, would I have to convert? Are
BLT's Kosher? If I got a rabbi drunk and got him to bless my pig, then
could I slip by?

Basically, on one hand, I'm sorry that you felt offended. That wasn't my
intention. I never try to offend. Annoy, yes. Offend, no. But the problem
is this. If that post offended you, you would probably be better off
deleting all my posts unread because I know, deep down in my heart, that I
will offend you again. I can't help it, It's a talent.

Getting ready to take a shovel to the wife if she don't quit yelling at me.
I bet Satan looks just like your ex-wife. That's what Hell is, being
re-united to spend eternity with a nagging bitch.
 ass


 Pussy


Jeff Wall   
 http://www.twangzine.com The Webs least sucky music magazine
727 Alder Circle - Va Beach, Va - 23462 -(757) 467-3764



Re: Blastered comp (was: Re: Americana discussion)

1999-01-20 Thread Jeff Wall

At 11:20 PM 1/20/99 EST, you wrote:

Rik wrote:

Also, if you haven't gotten around to picking up the VA-Blastered 
tribute CD by all means do so. Personally hadn't heard of several
of the artists on the CD but the thrill of discovering new artists like
The Grandsons,Last Train Home,  Highway 13 is the reason why
"Americana" is so interesting.

Has this been discussed? Was I sleeping? Using my "delete" finger liberally
that week?

Can I hear some details on this? (artists/label/etc.)

Sure, there's a f*cking  review on the f*cking Twangzine if you people
would ever bother to read the f*cking thing. g

Jeff Wall   
 http://www.twangzine.com The Webs least sucky music magazine
727 Alder Circle - Va Beach, Va - 23462 -(757) 467-3764