RE: [NF] Another app broken by IE7
Now I understand John Weller 01380 723235 07976 393631 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ted Roche Sent: 11 January 2007 02:56 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [NF] Another app broken by IE7 For those not in the know, http://www.jr.co.il/humor/noah4.txt ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Forget the SAT exam.
On 1/11/07, Ricardo Aráoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jean Laeremans wrote: On 1/10/07, Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I guess using a fork is out of the question. I wonder if they are forced to commit hari kari if they fail. http://www.jref.com/glossary/harakiri.shtml A+ jml It is actually Seppuku As if i didn't know this A+ jml ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Introduction and problems with old old code
Welcome and Good Morning (at least in my part of the world) Depending upon what you mean by porting to VFP 7. Any error messages when you attempt to open the project with VFP 7? And VFP 9 shouldn't have any problems opening the forms, I transfer back and forth between VFP 6 and VFP 9 just about every day... Assuming some sort of familiarity with the original project would it be possible to rebuild by starting with the main program? Regards, Desmond Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:23:57 +0900 To: profox@leafe.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Introduction and problems with old old code Hi, new to the list. Just to introduce myself, I used to be heavily involved in FoxPro long ago, in the 2.6/3 era (and earlier, in the FoxBASE+ era), coded in it heavily, in user groups etc. I have an old app from that era that I still support, when they call me up every couple of years. I don't really do much other Fox work, and I don't think I'm likely to. The problem is I've just been called in to deal with some problems with this app - odd behaviour it never used to display. The app was written originally for FoxBase+, then ported roughly to VFP 3 on Mac, then about 3 years ago I ported it to VFP 7 on Windows. Now, VFP 7 won't open the old project files anymore, we have VFP 9 but that doesn't appear to understand old .scx files. Any advice on bringing an old product like this into the modern era with minimal pain? Regards David ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] The end of desktop software development?
Accordingly to what a KPMG consultant told the company I was working for ten years ago, the PC is dead and right now we all are using some sort of set top box or thin client. Oracle said that before, didn't it? -- .~. Might, Courage, Vision, SINCERITY. http://www.linux-sxs.org / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and Farce be with you! /( _ )\ (Ubuntu 6.10) Linux 2.6.19.1 ^ ^ 19:39:02 up 30 days 1:51 0 users load average: 4.41 3.96 2.78 news://news.3home.net news://news.hkpcug.org news://news.newsgroup.com.hk ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] The end of desktop software development?
Man-wai CHANG wrote: Accordingly to what a KPMG consultant told the company I was working for ten years ago, the PC is dead and right now we all are using some sort of set top box or thin client. Oracle said that before, didn't it? Like IBM is today? Stephen Russell DBA / .Net Developer Memphis TN 38115 901.246-0159 Our scientific power has outrun our spiritual power. We have guided missiles and misguided men. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. http://spaces.msn.com/members/srussell/ -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.16.8/621 - Release Date: 1/9/2007 1:37 PM ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] I wonder how many suicides Kristyne is responsible for?
On Jan 10, 2007, at 11:18 PM, Kristyne McDaniel wrote: Back when I was originally treated for mental stress and depression (91/92), a psychiatrist that used a combination of talk and medical therapy treated me successfully with a medication that I later found out was used for people with a panic disorder and not so much for depression. FWIW, panic disorder, anxiety and depression seem to be part of a spectrum of manifestations of the same underlying problem. Why individuals express their symptoms differently is still not understood at all. I do hear what you are saying about how the drugs are carefully created. My point is that I don't think they are necessarily carefully prescribed. OK, I'd agree with that. But I think that that's true of all medicine: not all doctors are good at what they do. When I began having severe stomach problems in the early '90s, I went to several gastroenterologists, all of whom were experienced, and three of them mis-diagnosed me before I found one who recognized the rare condition that I had. The others had me go through all these tests and give up all sorts of foods (caffeine? garlic? why not just kill me now?), but of course none of it helped, and I got worse. I'm glad I didn't treat any of those first docs as all-knowing, because I'd probably have gotten a lot worse if I had kept doing what they said. -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead!
On Jan 10, 2007, at 11:27 PM, MB Software Solutions wrote: More interesting as to whether or not they'll be able to keep calling it the iphone. I give upwhy wouldn't they be allowed to continue calling it? Cisco owns the trademark to 'iPhone'. Apple had been in negotiations with them to be allowed to use the name, but they didn't come to an agreement before MacWorld. Jobs went ahead and announced the name as 'iPhone' anyway. Now the lawyers will duke it out. I'd bet that, based on the initial reaction to the iPhone (have you seen Apple's stock price these last two days?), Cisco will be demanding much more than they could have before the announcment. -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[OT] Bush is the new Lincoln?
Hardly, despite all the constant dropping of Lincoln's name. But it seems that Bush is actually the new LBJ. You know all those weird parallels between Kennedy and Lincoln? Well, it was forty years to the day that LBJ gave his speech announcing the escalation of the war in Vietnam that Bush announced his plans for the escalation of the occupation of Iraq. This site compares LBJ's words with Bush's: http://www.attytood.com/2007/01/eday_it_was_40_years_ago_today.html ( -or- http://tinyurl.com/yx6sop ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LBJ, Jan. 10, 1967: We have chosen to fight a limited war in Vietnam in an attempt to prevent a larger war--a war almost certain to follow, I believe, if the Communists succeed in overrunning and taking over South Vietnam by aggression and by force. I believe, and I am supported by some authority, that if they are not checked now the world can expect to pay a greater price to check them later. GWB, Jan. 10, 2007: Tonight in Iraq, the Armed Forces of the United States are engaged in a struggle that will determine the direction of the global war on terror – and our safety here at home. The new strategy I outline tonight will change America's course in Iraq, and help us succeed in the fight against terror. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LBJ, Jan. 10, 1967: We have chosen to fight a limited war in Vietnam in an attempt to prevent a larger war--a war almost certain to follow, I believe, if the Communists succeed in overrunning and taking over South Vietnam by aggression and by force. I believe, and I am supported by some authority, that if they are not checked now the world can expect to pay a greater price to check them later. GWB, Jan. 10, 2007: The challenge playing out across the broader Middle East is more than a military conflict. It is the decisive ideological struggle of our time…In the long run, the most realistic way to protect the American people is to provide a hopeful alternative to the hateful ideology of the enemy – by advancing liberty across a troubled region. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bush is the new Lincoln?
On Jan 11, 2007, at 7:21 AM, Ed Leafe wrote: LBJ, Jan. 10, 1967: We have chosen to fight a limited war in Vietnam Whoops - sorry for the copy/paste duplication. Read the link instead! -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[NF] Apple Nerds
http://darkgate.net/comic/images/joyoftech/1168406226.gif Stephen Russell DBA / .Net Developer Memphis TN 38115 901.246-0159 Our scientific power has outrun our spiritual power. We have guided missiles and misguided men. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. http://spaces.msn.com/members/srussell/ -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.16.9/622 - Release Date: 1/10/2007 2:52 PM ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bush is the new Lincoln?
On Thursday 11 January 2007 07:21, Ed Leafe wrote: Hardly, despite all the constant dropping of Lincoln's name. But it seems that Bush is actually the new LBJ. Hi Ed! Wow! Did you notice that they both wear pants as well? -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Attach MySQL files (not from a backup file)
Partial good news. I had to reapply the rights of the user to that database (go figure) and then restart the MySQL Administrator tool. I am now able to query the tables but I keep getting this error. The error I am still getting is: [CULLYTech] ERROR 1146: Table 'cns.1' doesn't exist Note: The 'cns' mentioned above is the name of the database. Tips? Kevin Cully CULLY Technologies, LLC Sponsor of Fox Forward 2006! http://foxforward.net Kevin Cully wrote: I put it in a directory on my Windows server and MySQL Control Center sees the databases. I can even see the fields, their types, and lengths. When I query for the data however, I'm getting errors and hitting a dead end. I'll get the exact error messages tomorrow. I know one of them is error 130. I was googling for the answer but I came up empty. I didn't expect them to send me another copy of the files. I was hoping for a true backup. Kevin Cully CULLY Technologies, LLC Sponsor of Fox Forward 2006! http://foxforward.net Ted Roche wrote: On 1/10/07, Kevin Cully [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've got a new client that keeps sending me a copy of their MySQL directory from their server instead of a proper backup of the MySQL database. If they shut down the server and are only using MyISAM engine, that might be a legitimate backup. But mysqldump or hotcopy is preferred... [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead!
Ed Leafe wrote: Cisco owns the trademark to 'iPhone'. Apple had been in negotiations with them to be allowed to use the name, but they didn't come to an agreement before MacWorld. Jobs went ahead and announced the name as 'iPhone' anyway. Now the lawyers will duke it out. I'd bet that, based on the initial reaction to the iPhone (have you seen Apple's stock price these last two days?), Cisco will be demanding much more than they could have before the announcment. Wish I had bought the Apple stock if that's the case!?! They could simply change the name to iTelephone. g -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Apple Nerds
Stephen Russell wrote: http://darkgate.net/comic/images/joyoftech/1168406226.gif LOL! The guy just to the right of the display case looks like the PC-Nerd from the Mac vs PC commercials. -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] The end of desktop software development?
Man-wai CHANG wrote: Accordingly to what a KPMG consultant told the company I was working for ten years ago, the PC is dead and right now we all are using some sort of set top box or thin client. Oracle said that before, didn't it? The term grid computing comes to mind for some reason. -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] The end of desktop software development?
Oracle said that before, didn't it? Over the past 23 years I have heard rumors and prophecies about PCs vanishing in favor of Thin Client appliances, and huge Intranet/Internet/Centralized Servers managing the entire computing experience for all End Users. The only thing that vanished for the most part was the Thin Client appliances taking over the End User experience. False start after false start, and millions of dollars made vainly in Hype-Investment by those organizations deluded into thinking they were certainly the perfect candidate for this brand new technology, only to have their organizations reverting to the more expensive (but more useful) PC-to-Server environment. Thin Client can functionally (not merely technically) work in the proper environment, but certainly not in all environments (or even most). Yet folks were tricked into thinking their company was perfect for Thin Net, and the sales person pushing them into the new technology had no realistic incentive to talk their customers out of a large commission expenditure. Time and again I have seen companies lose focus as their Thin Net efforts would crash and burn when trying to make Thin Net work at least as well as their more conventional (and previously operational) PC-Server architecture. So sad, yet funny as hell. Lemmings. I still remember Larry Ellison mouthing off about how Oracle was going to be the company to finally make it happen. Enough said about Oracle's impact in making it happen I guess. Long ago false prophets were stoned to death, now they get rewarded for being dead wrong. Nothing so new as something too old (1-2 years) for the current management of a firm to be aware of in Thin Net's previous existence(s). Much less the reasons why the previous efforts met with failure for so many organizations. I have become very cautious about adopting any new technology (or Windows O/S) until it has been in the retail market for about 2 years. No more being the first in the water, 'cuz that be where the sharks lurk... Gil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Man-wai CHANG Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 6:40 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [NF] The end of desktop software development? Accordingly to what a KPMG consultant told the company I was working for ten years ago, the PC is dead and right now we all are using some sort of set top box or thin client. Oracle said that before, didn't it? -- .~. Might, Courage, Vision, SINCERITY. http://www.linux-sxs.org / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and Farce be with you! /( _ )\ (Ubuntu 6.10) Linux 2.6.19.1 ^ ^ 19:39:02 up 30 days 1:51 0 users load average: 4.41 3.96 2.78 news://news.3home.net news://news.hkpcug.org news://news.newsgroup.com.hk [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Apple Nerds
On Jan 11, 2007, at 8:54 AM, MB Software Solutions wrote: LOL! The guy just to the right of the display case looks like the PC-Nerd from the Mac vs PC commercials. It's supposed to - that's from the new commercial they showed at MacWorld. -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead!
Here you go Dave, I now have an iPhone http://forum.xda-developers.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=32970d=1168 464570 ROFL! -- This email was sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unless otherwise agreed expressly in writing by Marine Software Limited, this communication and attachments are to be treated as confidential and the information in it may not be used or disclosed except for the purpose for which it was sent. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication you should destroy it without copying, disclosing or otherwise using its contents. Please notify the sender immediately of the error. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead!
Or http://tinyurl.com/vofkq for easier access -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tristan Leask Posted At: 11 January 2007 15:04 Posted To: Profox Archive Conversation: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead! Subject: RE: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead! Here you go Dave, I now have an iPhone http://forum.xda-developers.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=32970d=1168 464570 ROFL! -- This email was sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unless otherwise agreed expressly in writing by Marine Software Limited, this communication and attachments are to be treated as confidential and the information in it may not be used or disclosed except for the purpose for which it was sent. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication you should destroy it without copying, disclosing or otherwise using its contents. Please notify the sender immediately of the error. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Introduction and problems with old old code
Hullo.
There's a difference between the concept of
can't open the project
and
can't open files in the project
If you can't open the project any more - then try to use the project file
as a table, and see if you can at least do that. if you can not, then the
project file itself is corrupted.
If you can't open files in the project, then it could be one of:
1. file listed in project, but is not physically stored _NOW_ where it
was _PREVIOUSLY_. You'll have to do a search for the file names, suggest
using the search in Windows Explorer or a cmd shell [dir filename.ext /s]
2. file listed, file exists, you can see it, but you can't make changes
and save it. Check the file attributes. Also - was this project ever
under a source control provider, such as Visual Source Safe? If so, then
you have
to strip the VSS attributes out of each file, and remove any VSS control
files (SCA, PJM, etc etc] and change the file attributes to remove 'read
only' .
3. File listed, file exists, you can see the file, but never opens up for
editing at all. throws some error message or not. It's possible the file
was corrupted as a table. Remember that most 'things' in vfp come in
pairs - there will be 2 files for a report file, for example, 2 files for
a form, 2 files for a class library.
Do you get any error messages when you try to do stuff with the project
file? Please describe the action you are doing prior to the error, and
the verbiage on the error itself.
Regards [Bill]
--
William Sanders / efGroup {rmv the DOT BOB to reply}
Mondo Cool TeleCom - http://www.efgroup.net/efgcog.html
Mondo Cool WebHosting - http://www.efgroup.net/efglunar.html
Mondo Cool DSL - http://www.efgroup.net/shopfordsl.html
VFP Webhosting? You BET! - http://efgroup.net/vfpwebhosting
Failing dotNet Project? - http://www.dotnetconversions.com
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead!
On 1/11/07, Tristan Leask [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Or http://tinyurl.com/vofkq for easier access You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons: A+ jml ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead!
Doh, hang on Tristan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jean Laeremans Posted At: 11 January 2007 15:36 Posted To: Profox Archive Conversation: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead! Subject: Re: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead! On 1/11/07, Tristan Leask [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Or http://tinyurl.com/vofkq for easier access You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons: A+ jml [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead!
http://www.tleask.plus.com/iphone.bmp And here is the post with the plugins... http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=1097832postcount=70 Tristan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tristan Leask Posted At: 11 January 2007 15:46 Posted To: Profox Archive Conversation: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead! Subject: RE: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead! Doh, hang on Tristan -- This email was sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unless otherwise agreed expressly in writing by Marine Software Limited, this communication and attachments are to be treated as confidential and the information in it may not be used or disclosed except for the purpose for which it was sent. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication you should destroy it without copying, disclosing or otherwise using its contents. Please notify the sender immediately of the error. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Read events, commandbuttons batch processing loops
This is an old story: I have a form that initiates a lengthy batch processing loop. The command buttons on the form are unclickable while the loop is running so I set escape on, test for inkey() in the loop and exit if the user presses escape This get me back to my read events statement and the buttons become alive again. This method is as old as the hills and somewhat inelegant. Are there any other or newer suggestions? -Lew ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Read events, commandbuttons batch processing loops
Try a DOEVENTS in the loop instead of inkey()? Tristan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lew Schwartz Posted At: 11 January 2007 16:50 Posted To: Profox Archive Conversation: Read events, commandbuttons batch processing loops Subject: Read events, commandbuttons batch processing loops This is an old story: I have a form that initiates a lengthy batch processing loop. The command buttons on the form are unclickable while the loop is running so I set escape on, test for inkey() in the loop and exit if the user presses escape This get me back to my read events statement and the buttons become alive again. This method is as old as the hills and somewhat inelegant. Are there any other or newer suggestions? -Lew -- This email was sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unless otherwise agreed expressly in writing by Marine Software Limited, this communication and attachments are to be treated as confidential and the information in it may not be used or disclosed except for the purpose for which it was sent. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication you should destroy it without copying, disclosing or otherwise using its contents. Please notify the sender immediately of the error. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Read events, commandbuttons batch processing loops
Lew Schwartz wrote: This is an old story: I have a form that initiates a lengthy batch processing loop. The command buttons on the form are unclickable while the loop is running so I set escape on, test for inkey() in the loop and exit if the user presses escape This get me back to my read events statement and the buttons become alive again. This method is as old as the hills and somewhat inelegant. Are there any other or newer suggestions? One (at least) - before entering the loop (when setting up the inkey) disable the command button(s) - this will give the user a visual cue that they are (temporarily) unavailable -Lew [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Forget the SAT exam.
= Subject: Re: [OT] Forget the SAT exam. = = On 1/11/07, Ricardo Aráoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: = Jean Laeremans wrote: = On 1/10/07, Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: = I guess using a fork is out of the question. I wonder = if they are = forced to commit hari kari if they fail. = = http://www.jref.com/glossary/harakiri.shtml = = A+ = jml = = = It is actually Seppuku = = As if i didn't know this = = A+ = jml = Jean, mon ami, you know ev-er-y-thing. Which is quite scary, I know, because I do to. Otherwise I would not know that you know everything. Yes, the old saying is all too true ... It takes one to know one. And you cannot perform Seppuku if you are alone; there would be no point, no pun intended. B+ HALinNY ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] Another app broken by IE7
= Subject: RE: [NF] Another app broken by IE7 = = = There is no need to thank me for this exposition. = = Or reason to. = = Ken Dibble Exactly! B+ HALinNY ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] I wonder how many suicides Kristyne is responsible for?
Ed, The others had me go through all these tests and give up all sorts of foods (caffeine? garlic? why not just kill me now?) I think that the majority of doctors aren't keeping up with the areas of medicine that they need to so that they can be truly effective. Steve's flesh eating bacteria took several days to diagnose. He's alive because he started early, a surgeon in the ER recognized his symptoms, and his cardiologist just happened to be in the hospital at the time he was there. They were about to treat him for a heart attack and give him meds to lower his blood pressure, and that would have killed him because the infection lowers blood pressure to the point that it is deadly. Mortality rates are so high for conditions that are rare. And when you think about it, there are so many rare conditions that each of us are going to know people that have rare conditions. Kristyne McDaniel http://www.mcstyles.com http://www.emryldlife.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] I wonder how many suicides Kristyne is responsible for?
= Subject: RE: [OT] I wonder how many suicides Kristyne is = responsible for? = = Mortality rates are so high for conditions that are rare. = And when you think about it, there are so many rare = conditions that each of us are going to know people that = have rare conditions. = = Kristyne McDaniel This can easily be corrected by exposing more people to what we consider to be rare conditions. As the frequency of occurrence increases the clinical and, unfortunately, postmortem data will increase and these conditions will revert to being rare again due to the improved preventatives and treatments developed while the conditions were common, but presumably with significantly lower mortality rates than we currently experience. Improving life expectancy is one way of reducing the rarity of certain disorders, particularly those that are concomitant with advanced geriatricity. Who knows how many new diseases science will discover as our population is afforded the opportunity to age well beyond its natural life expectancy? Darwin's theory of survival-of-the-fittest is being transformed to survival-of-the-best-medicated. B+ HALinNY ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] I wonder how many suicides Kristyne is responsible for?
On Jan 11, 2007, at 5:07 PM, Hal Kaplan wrote: Darwin's theory of survival-of-the-fittest When did he ever say anything like that? I'm only familiar with his theory of evolution by natural selection. -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] I wonder how many suicides Kristyne is responsible for?
= Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 17:13 = To: ProFox Email List = Subject: Re: [OT] I wonder how many suicides Kristyne is = responsible for? = = On Jan 11, 2007, at 5:07 PM, Hal Kaplan wrote: = = Darwin's theory of survival-of-the-fittest = = When did he ever say anything like that? I'm only = familiar with his theory of evolution by natural selection. = = -- Ed Leafe It was over beers at the Gallapagos Inn and I am surprised that you did not know that, Ed. Chuck was toying with both names but his publisher thought that the one you mentioned sounded more scientific. Considering what Johnny Cochran did with fittest that publisher was pretty prescient. B+ HALinNY ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[OT] That quaint old Constitution
Remember the US Constitution, that quaint old document of pre-9/11 thinking? I think that this quote sums up what has replaced it: The President has the ability to exercise his own authority if he thinks Congress has voted the wrong way. - Tony Snow, January 8, 2007. But hey, who pays attention to all that pre-9/11 crap anyways? It had a good run, but stick a fork in it; it's done. -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] That quaint old Constitution
= To: ProFox Mailing List = Subject: [OT] That quaint old Constitution = = Remember the US Constitution, that quaint old document = of pre-9/11 thinking? I think that this quote sums up what = has replaced it: = = The President has the ability to exercise his own = authority if he thinks Congress has voted the wrong way. - = Tony Snow, January 8, 2007. = = But hey, who pays attention to all that pre-9/11 crap = anyways? It had a good run, but stick a fork in it; it's done. = = -- Ed Leafe = That's what living in a Constitutional Monarchy will do to you. If the original King George would have been so easy-going, we might never have cut the cord. But think about it, this is all beginning to make sense in an insidious way. Our educational efforts pretty much suck ... so who can read the Constitution (assuming its existence is known), let alone understand any of it? Those of us who can and have and do are getting old and will die, sooner than later because our healthcare system sucks. Going forward, the only ones who will really understand any of that Constitutional mumbo-jumbo will be newly-sworn citizens, but we are not really allowing any significant immigration. So as the tree is left unattended, unfed, unwatered, unnourished, it will wither and die. We need a Constitutional amendment to authorize the translation of our Constitution into Spanish, but strictly for historical purposes. This would be consistent with that episode from Star Trek where the aliens were really post-nuclear-holocaust Americans. B+ HALinNY ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bush is the new Lincoln?
Let's suppose the subject is true Then for Christ's sake, let's find the new Wilkes Booth. ;c) ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Forget the SAT exam.
Jean Laeremans wrote: On 1/11/07, Ricardo Aráoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jean Laeremans wrote: On 1/10/07, Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I guess using a fork is out of the question. I wonder if they are forced to commit hari kari if they fail. http://www.jref.com/glossary/harakiri.shtml A+ jml It is actually Seppuku As if i didn't know this A+ jml Gomen Nasai, didn't catch your Japanese accent. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Forget the SAT exam.
Hal Kaplan wrote: = Subject: Re: [OT] Forget the SAT exam. = = On 1/11/07, Ricardo Aráoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: = Jean Laeremans wrote: = On 1/10/07, Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: = I guess using a fork is out of the question. I wonder = if they are = forced to commit hari kari if they fail. = = http://www.jref.com/glossary/harakiri.shtml = = A+ = jml = = = It is actually Seppuku = = As if i didn't know this = = A+ = jml = Jean, mon ami, you know ev-er-y-thing. Which is quite scary, I know, because I do to. Otherwise I would not know that you know everything. Yes, the old saying is all too true ... It takes one to know one. And you cannot perform Seppuku if you are alone; there would be no point, no pun intended. B+ HALinNY Well... actually you can. You won't have a second nor witnesses but if say you're about to be captured by the enemy... Ever wondered how did the last of the 47 Samurai commit seppuku? Who was his second? ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] I wonder how many suicides Kristyne is responsible for?
Ed Leafe wrote: On Jan 11, 2007, at 5:07 PM, Hal Kaplan wrote: Darwin's theory of survival-of-the-fittest When did he ever say anything like that? I'm only familiar with his theory of evolution by natural selection. Which means blind luck (ok, applied statistics if you want). ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bush is the new Lincoln?
Be careful, it is illegal in the United States to support the assasination of the president. --- Ricardo Aráoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Let's suppose the subject is true Then for Christ's sake, let's find the new Wilkes Booth. ;c) ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Forget the SAT exam.
= Subject: Re: [OT] Forget the SAT exam. = = Hal Kaplan wrote: = = And you cannot perform Seppuku if you are alone; there = would be no point, no pun intended. = = B+ = HALinNY = = = Well... actually you can. You won't have a second nor = witnesses but if say you're about to be captured by the enemy... = Ever wondered how did the last of the 47 Samurai commit = seppuku? Who was his second? = Nietzsche is not around to resolve this issue (like the falling tree making a sound in an empty forest). I contend that the very last one did not practice seppuku, by definition. Killing yourself because you are captured is not very good. If John McCain had done that, who would we have to look up to now? Our American Code of Conduct requires that anyone captured by the enemy must make every effort to escape and otherwise interfere with the continued existence of that enemy, not to commit suicide or practice seppuku. Therefore, I must say that Seppuku is for Sissies! B+ HALinNY ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Bush is the new Lincoln?
Madigan, Be careful, it is illegal in the United States to support the assasination of the president. That law only applies in the US... Keep it in mind when Hillary or Barack or Edwards or whomever is next becomes President. You may not be seeing straight the day after election day next year. Kristyne McDaniel http://www.mcstyles.com http://www.emryldlife.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Bush is the new Lincoln?
You can bet I won't joke about assasinating them. --- Kristyne McDaniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Madigan, Be careful, it is illegal in the United States to support the assasination of the president. That law only applies in the US... Keep it in mind when Hillary or Barack or Edwards or whomever is next becomes President. You may not be seeing straight the day after election day next year. Kristyne McDaniel http://www.mcstyles.com http://www.emryldlife.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] That quaint old Constitution
Hal, But think about it, this is all beginning to make sense in an insidious way. Our educational efforts pretty much suck ... so who can read the Constitution (assuming its existence is known), let alone understand any of it? You're kidding, right? The US constitution is short and not difficult at all to read and understand. Sure, there are interpretations that can be difficult, but the basic message is something an elementary school kid can understand. That's when I got my first intro to it. As far as newly sworn-in citizens being the only ones that understand it ... Hardly. That constitution of ours is still better known around the world than just about any other country's constitution. Pieces of it are told to travelers as warnings, such as to watch out because in this country the citizens are frequently armed. Kristyne McDaniel http://www.mcstyles.com http://www.emryldlife.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bush is the new Lincoln?
Michael Madigan wrote: Be careful, it is illegal in the United States to support the assasination of the president. I don't give a damn. I'm not subject to YOUR laws (lucky eh?). --- Ricardo Aráoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Let's suppose the subject is true Then for Christ's sake, let's find the new Wilkes Booth. ;c) ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Forget the SAT exam.
Hal Kaplan wrote: = Subject: Re: [OT] Forget the SAT exam. = = Hal Kaplan wrote: = = And you cannot perform Seppuku if you are alone; there = would be no point, no pun intended. = = B+ = HALinNY = = = Well... actually you can. You won't have a second nor = witnesses but if say you're about to be captured by the enemy... = Ever wondered how did the last of the 47 Samurai commit = seppuku? Who was his second? = Nietzsche is not around to resolve this issue (like the falling tree making a sound in an empty forest). I contend that the very last one did not practice seppuku, by definition. Killing yourself because you are captured is not very good. If John McCain had done that, who would we have to look up to now? Our American Code of Conduct requires that anyone captured by the enemy must make every effort to escape and otherwise interfere with the continued existence of that enemy, not to commit suicide or practice seppuku. Therefore, I must say that Seppuku is for Sissies! B+ HALinNY That answer would be real nice save for the fact that seppuku is JAPANESE CULTURE. Besides, in seppuku the second (or helper) is there to cut your head when you require it. So you won't be disgraced if the pain is too much for you. But you can commit seppuku without a second, you'll only have to endure pain for a longer time. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead!
Tristan Leask wrote: Or http://tinyurl.com/vofkq for easier access I Hate that register crap. Stephen Russell DBA / .Net Developer Memphis TN 38115 901.246-0159 Our scientific power has outrun our spiritual power. We have guided missiles and misguided men. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. http://spaces.msn.com/members/srussell/ -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.16.9/622 - Release Date: 1/10/2007 2:52 PM ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead!
I think I spy an iPhoney Jim -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tristan Leask Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 10:48 AM To: profox@leafe.com Subject:RE: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead! http://www.tleask.plus.com/iphone.bmp And here is the post with the plugins... http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=1097832postcount=70 Tristan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tristan Leask Posted At: 11 January 2007 15:46 Posted To: Profox Archive Conversation: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead! Subject: RE: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead! Doh, hang on Tristan -- This email was sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unless otherwise agreed expressly in writing by Marine Software Limited, this communication and attachments are to be treated as confidential and the information in it may not be used or disclosed except for the purpose for which it was sent. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication you should destroy it without copying, disclosing or otherwise using its contents. Please notify the sender immediately of the error. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bush is the new Lincoln?
I hope you don't plan on coming here, they may refuse your visa. --- Ricardo Aráoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Michael Madigan wrote: Be careful, it is illegal in the United States to support the assasination of the president. I don't give a damn. I'm not subject to YOUR laws (lucky eh?). --- Ricardo Aráoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Let's suppose the subject is true Then for Christ's sake, let's find the new Wilkes Booth. ;c) ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bush is the new Lincoln?
Michael Madigan wrote: I hope you don't plan on coming here, they may refuse your visa. Nope. Lots of interesting places to visit first. --- Ricardo Aráoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Michael Madigan wrote: Be careful, it is illegal in the United States to support the assasination of the president. I don't give a damn. I'm not subject to YOUR laws (lucky eh?). --- Ricardo Aráoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Let's suppose the subject is true Then for Christ's sake, let's find the new Wilkes Booth. ;c) ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Can FPD2.6 application run on Windows 2003 server
Never had problems with DOS applications hanging, BUT you have to do this as a minimum: 1. Support files in the path (novell on drive Z) 2. Config.fp settings set to local drive, NOT to server 3. separate operating folder on the server for each client accessing the system, use getenv() to swap the folders If you do this, you will not have problems.. If you do, set me up a vnc situation and I'll help you to get it working properly with you being onsite and me being offsite. Virgil Bierschwale http://www.virgilslist.com http://www.tccutlery.com http://www.bierschwale.com http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christof Wollenhaupt Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 4:07 AM To: profox@leafe.com Subject: RE: Can FPD2.6 application run on Windows 2003 server Hi, Does anyone run FPD2.6 application on Windows 2003 server ? They don't work with Terminal Services. DOS applications hang multiple times a day without any solution that I'm aware of. -- Christof [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Bush is the new Lincoln?
And I would consider it VERY POOR TASTE.. Shows a total lack of class in my opinion. Virgil Bierschwale http://www.virgilslist.com http://www.tccutlery.com http://www.bierschwale.com http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 5:38 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Bush is the new Lincoln? Be careful, it is illegal in the United States to support the assasination of the president. --- Ricardo Aráoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Let's suppose the subject is true Then for Christ's sake, let's find the new Wilkes Booth. ;c) ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bush is the new Lincoln?
On Thursday 11 January 2007 18:26, Ricardo Aráoz wrote: Hi Ricardo! Spoken like a real foreign enemy. Let's suppose the subject is true Then for Christ's sake, let's find the new Wilkes Booth. ;c) -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[OT] the new style of campaign
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Bql6Z00lyEmode=relatedsearch= Not just a 20 second spin. Stephen Russell DBA / .Net Developer Memphis TN 38115 901.246-0159 Our scientific power has outrun our spiritual power. We have guided missiles and misguided men. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. http://spaces.msn.com/members/srussell/ -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.16.9/622 - Release Date: 1/10/2007 2:52 PM ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bush is the new Lincoln?
On Thursday 11 January 2007 18:37, Michael Madigan wrote: Be careful, it is illegal in the United States to support the assasination of the president. Hi Michael! He is in some foreign coward's haven, safe from justice, I'm afraid. -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] I wonder how many suicides Kristyne is responsible for?
On Thursday 11 January 2007 19:34, Kristyne McDaniel wrote: Hal, This can easily be corrected by exposing more people to what we consider to be rare conditions. I believe the correction is more likely to come when doctors avail themselves of online medical information to a greater extent. Doctors are still memorizing everything and aren't researching answers like they should be. When they can break away from trusting only what they remember we will all benefit. Hi Kristyne! Sigh, I am afraid that you are going against tradition here. Maybe in a hundred years . . . -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bush is the new Lincoln?
On Thursday 11 January 2007 20:04, Ricardo Aráoz wrote: Michael Madigan wrote: Be careful, it is illegal in the United States to support the assasination of the president. I don't give a damn. I'm not subject to YOUR laws (lucky eh?). Hi Ricardo! Thank you for your candor. We will take this into consideration every time we see anything from you from now on. -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Can FPD2.6 application run on Windows 2003 server
thanks virgil. the customer haven't decide yet. i sure will trouble u if have problem. hah. Best Regards, Yap On 1/12/07, Virgil Bierschwale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Never had problems with DOS applications hanging, BUT you have to do this as a minimum: 1. Support files in the path (novell on drive Z) 2. Config.fp settings set to local drive, NOT to server 3. separate operating folder on the server for each client accessing the system, use getenv() to swap the folders If you do this, you will not have problems.. If you do, set me up a vnc situation and I'll help you to get it working properly with you being onsite and me being offsite. Virgil Bierschwale http://www.virgilslist.com http://www.tccutlery.com http://www.bierschwale.com http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christof Wollenhaupt Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 4:07 AM To: profox@leafe.com Subject: RE: Can FPD2.6 application run on Windows 2003 server Hi, Does anyone run FPD2.6 application on Windows 2003 server ? They don't work with Terminal Services. DOS applications hang multiple times a day without any solution that I'm aware of. -- Christof [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
