Re: Go on developing qmail!!!!
We can build a mail list to discuss this. My idea is : * build a core develop group * build a document group * build a user support group * invite patch author join core develope group and neaten all patchs,include some patch into the new version - You go, girl! How about...maybe...a few suggestions. We like suggestions for the following: * Things which haven't yet been proved wrong, impossible, stupid, or otherwise, beyond all reasonable doubt. * Things which haven't been documented *anywhere* * Things which are currently contained in patches * Things which make qmail faster Thankyou. -- Is OS/2 only half an operating system ?
Sending mail to another machine
Hello, 1- I'm using Qmail following LWQ of Dave Sill with a Relay in DMZ + Server in LAN. I want now to tell Relay machine to send mails of certains users to any machine lying anwhere (in DMZ, LAN or Internet), instead to sending them always to my LAN-server. How I can do this? Is this needs to install Qmail, create new user's account on machines? 2- Sendmail demon was installed by default on all my machines, it allowing me before to send mails for root or user ( logs, alert, etc...). I deinstallating it, but as a result mail can't be sent now. What to do in order to allow machines in DMZ or LAN where Qmail is not installed to just sent messages like alert, logs, etc. to root account or any other user? I'm heared about a qmail-client, or a particular installation of sendmail which allow us to do this. Can you give helps, url, ...? Is maintaining sendmail demon on my machines can compromise security? PS: I lincked sendmail to qmail as indicated in LWQ on both my relay and server. Thanks
Re: Sending mail to another machine
At 09:56 22.05.01 +0200, Mohamed Ould wrote: Hello, 1- I'm using Qmail following LWQ of Dave Sill with a Relay in DMZ + Server in LAN. I want now to tell Relay machine to send mails of certains users to any machine lying anwhere (in DMZ, LAN or Internet), instead to sending them always to my LAN-server. How I can do this? Is this needs to install Qmail, create new user's account on machines? A good way is to use virtual domains. In webmin there is an external module for qmail to handle virtual domains. 2- Sendmail demon was installed by default on all my machines, it allowing me before to send mails for root or user ( logs, alert, etc...). I deinstallating it, but as a result mail can't be sent now. You have to make a symbolic link to the sendmail of qmail. Much programs are looking for sendmail and you have to place the link on the old place of sendmail. What to do in order to allow machines in DMZ or LAN where Qmail is not installed to just sent messages like alert, logs, etc. to root account or any other user? On the DMZ i prefere to install qmail because of security. On the hosts in the dmz there should be disabled all services that are not needed. Think about good rules for the firewall. In ipchains you have three chains the input chain, the forward chain and the outputchain. You can build rules such good-bad, dmz-bad, dmz-good,... I'm heared about a qmail-client, or a particular installation of sendmail http://www.sendmail.org or you are looking in a searchengine for postfix or exim. Regards, Ruprecht
Re: Go on developing qmail!!!!
At 14:22 22.05.01 +0800, Liu Hong wrote: We can build a mail list to discuss this. My idea is : * build a core develop group * build a document group * build a user support group * invite patch author join core develope group and neaten all patchs,include some patch into the new version The best way is to use qmail with ezmlm (http://www.ezmlm.org) In the faq you will find how to build mailing-lists. The handling is exclusive by sending mails to different adresses. For subscribing you send only a blanko-email to list-subscribe@listserver. Regards, Ruprecht
badrcptto
Ok, so I got the badrcptto patch working. It doesn't look like it will do partial addresses. You know how badmailfrom will let you just put in @domain.com. I was hoping that this patch might let you put in user@ and reject all mail for that user regardless of domain. I don't really follow the C code well, so I don't see how to do this. Any ideas? Brian Moon -- dealnews.com, Inc. Makers of dealnews, dealmac http://dealnews.com/ | http://dealmac.com/
Re: badrcptto
Ok, I am looking really hard at the code here. It looks like the @ magic of badmailfrom is somewhere in here which was copied directly for badrcpto: j = byte_rchr(addr.s,addr.len,'@'); if (j addr.len) if (constmap(mapbrt,addr.s + j,addr.len - j - 1)) return 1; I am still not sure exactly what this is saying though. I know in psuedo code terms, but I can not figure out how to change it to make it work at matching user@. Any ideas? Brian Moon -- dealnews.com, Inc. Makers of dealnews, dealmac http://dealnews.com/ | http://dealmac.com/ - Original Message - From: Brian Moon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmail [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 3:49 AM Subject: badrcptto Ok, so I got the badrcptto patch working. It doesn't look like it will do partial addresses. You know how badmailfrom will let you just put in @domain.com. I was hoping that this patch might let you put in user@ and reject all mail for that user regardless of domain. I don't really follow the C code well, so I don't see how to do this. Any ideas? Brian Moon -- dealnews.com, Inc. Makers of dealnews, dealmac http://dealnews.com/ | http://dealmac.com/
qmail + vpopmail + maildrop + sqwebmail 2.0.0
Hi! Anyone that have put opp something like this? How do I set up Maildrop too work under vpopmail so I can build filter with sqwebmail 2.0.0 Have'nt found any good information on this one! Best regard --Roy Svendsen Life is like an potato!
qmail Digest 22 May 2001 10:00:00 -0000 Issue 1372
qmail Digest 22 May 2001 10:00:00 - Issue 1372 Topics (messages 62798 through 62838): Re: qmail as 'proxy' - comments? 62798 by: Peter van Dijk 62802 by: Brett Randall minifaq 62799 by: Tim Titzmann 62803 by: Peter van Dijk Spamcontrol trouble 62800 by: Philipp Steinkrüger Re: qmail + mutt 62801 by: Karsten W. Rohrbach Re: Administrivia: Move to EZMLM] 62804 by: Mate Wierdl How redirect mail to another server 62805 by: Mohamed Ould leave a copy of messages on server 62806 by: Roberto Marzialetti 62808 by: Greg White 62809 by: Peter van Dijk 62810 by: Isaac Chapman 62817 by: Peter van Dijk 62823 by: Jim Steele R: leave a copy of messages on server 62807 by: Andrea Cerrito 62816 by: Medi Montaseri Timeout issues. 62811 by: Hank Wethington 62820 by: Chris Johnson Compile problems with compilation of daemontools-0.70 on RH 7.1 62812 by: Ed Weinberg 62813 by: Ed Weinberg 62814 by: Carl J. Danowski 62815 by: Henning Brauer 62818 by: Ed Weinberg 62822 by: K. F. Yim need a badmailto solution 62819 by: Brian Moon 62821 by: Frank Tegtmeyer 62824 by: Jim Steele fastforward broke my email 62825 by: RC Re: The best way to setup... 62826 by: Dean Staff Re: injecting qmail-queue (asking again) 62827 by: Todd Finney 62828 by: peter green 62830 by: Todd Finney Go on developing qmail 62829 by: Liu Hong 62831 by: Brett Randall 62832 by: Liu Hong 62835 by: Ruprecht Helms Sending mail to another machine 62833 by: Mohamed Ould 62834 by: Ruprecht Helms badrcptto 62836 by: Brian Moon 62837 by: Brian Moon qmail + vpopmail + maildrop + sqwebmail 2.0.0 62838 by: Roy Svendsen Administrivia: To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe to the digest, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To bug my human owner, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To post to the list, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 02:40:54AM +0100, John P wrote: We run a Linux box (LRP) as a firewall on our office network. Currently ports 25 and 110 are portforwarded to an internal server which runs qmail (on RedHat 7.0). Is there any point in setting up a forwarding-only version of qmail (perhaps using QMTP?) on the firewall box, or on a separate box in say a DMZ? I know a 'mail proxy' like this is recommended for Sendmail in some network security books, and if we did it then the internal box would have no ports open to the outside world*, but with qmail's inherent security, is it necessary? You could put qmail on the firewall host with qmail-qmqpc (check the mini-qmail docs) so that no outside box talks to your internal mailserver directly. Local queueing+smtproutes works too, ofcourse. Whether this is needed for a qmail box itself is not a question - when creating a secure system, you ignore that any specific bit is secure and still secure everything around it. *although as I type this I'm guessing that POP3 would still need to go through to the internal server due to the user's home directories being on there Yes, pop3 is not that easily fixed. Greetz, Peter. Peter == Peter van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 02:40:54AM +0100, John P wrote: *although as I type this I'm guessing that POP3 would still need to go through to the internal server due to the user's home directories being on there Yes, pop3 is not that easily fixed. Except with NFS. Not the greatest solution, but in a few cases I still use it and it works *mainly* fine (except for transferring 10mb attachments over 28.8k modem links...it doesn't like that much). -- ... File not found. Should I fake it? (Y/N) On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 11:38:31AM +0200, Tim Titzmann wrote: Talking about *mini* :) Greetz, Peter. Hello, i am having trouble with qmail and the spamcontrol patch. i am using qmail with vpopmail and the spamcontol patch. I have a tcp.smtp file to allow clients to relay mail, and i have a roaming users system set up. Now what i want to do is to only allow deliveries to existing users on the system. Therefore i added *@* to badrcptpatterns and a list of all account with a ! in front of it. - Now every mail not in this list is rejected, and no system can relay mails. Whats wrong ? Here is how i start qmail: /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -x /home/vpopmail/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -v -u 71 -g 104 smtp /usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd -rblackholes.mail-abuse.org /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd 21 | /var/qmail/bin/splogger smtpd 2 If you can please help me out... Best Regards, Philipp Steinkrüger Philipp Steinkrüger Technik Oberberg
R: R: leave a copy of messages on server
Mmmmhhh, I don't think it's possible. Anyway, you can set a crontab to delete old messages (ie: 30 days old) or you can set quota. It's not advisable to make the delete mandatory because: 1) user may want to look his/her messages from a location, and to download them from another one, 2) the data transfer may fail for some reason (and you force deletion of a message unread by user) Good work ---Cordiali saluti / Best regardsAndrea Cerrito^^Net.Admin @ Centro MultiMediale di Terni S.p.A.P.zzale Bosco 3A05100 Terni ITTel. +39 744 5441330Fax. +39 744 5441372 -Messaggio originale-Da: medi [mailto:medi]Per conto di Medi MontaseriInviato: lunedì 21 maggio 2001 21.11A: Andrea CerritoCc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Oggetto: Re: R: leave a copy of messages on serverI have the opposit question, is it possible to mandate delete? That is, can I mandate the all messages be downloaded from a POP server? Andrea Cerrito wrote: Mmmm... strange. A normal pop3 session is like ... stat retr #num dele #num and if you set "leave a copy..." the dele action is never done. Try to telnet to your box and act as a mail client: you'll be able to know if it's a problem with qmail (I don't think so, anyway) or with your client. I mean +OK [EMAIL PROTECTED] user $YOURUSER +OK pass $YOURPASS +OK stat +OK 1 1228 retr 1 bla bla bla bla bla quit +OK then reconnect and see if the message is still alive. Good luck --- Cordiali saluti / Best regards Andrea Cerrito ^^ Net.Admin @ Centro MultiMediale di Terni S.p.A. P.zzale Bosco 3A 05100 Terni IT Tel. +39 744 5441330 Fax. +39 744 5441372 -Messaggio originale- Da: Roberto Marzialetti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Inviato: lunedì 21 maggio 2001 18.39 A: Qmail List Oggetto: leave a copy of messages on serverHi boys have got a problem... well... if i active the option "leave a copy of messages on server " on my email client, the messages doesn't leave on my server :o(( have you got some solution ? many thanks Roberto -- === Medi Montaseri, [EMAIL PROTECTED], 408-450-7114 Prepass Inc, IT/Operations, Software Eng. ===
Re: injecting qmail-queue (asking again)
* Todd Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010522 01:09]: I thought about that, but it isn't really an ezmlm question anymore. There doesn't seem to be an example on using qmail-queue anywhere. It seems to me that there probably should be. Fair enough. So make ezmlm-reject omit that behavior. `man ezmlm-reject` And give up the spam protection that this provides? No thanks :). There are ways of emulating this sort of spam protection with ezmlm-issubn; a couple have been mentioned on the ezmlm list. Check the archives at [http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ezmlm]. Eek, why not invoke ezmlm-send for each list? `man ezmlm-send` No need to mess with qmail-queue, I don't think. Yea, that sounds nice, but there isn't an example of using that outside of a .qmail file, either. I'd think that tfinney]$ cat ./list_monthly_announcement.txt | /usr/local/bin/ezmlm/ezmlm-send /home/list/test/ would work, but no dice. That is indeed the syntax. I'm still pretty convinced that this is the best way to do this; you might want to look into why that doesn't work, regardless of any other solution. I created my message file, message.txt, and my envelope file envelope.txt. AFAIK, they're in the correct format. [...] I tried three different formats. I believe the first is correct, but I saw a few mentioning of the other two, and tried them. I saw no difference in running the script with any of them. F [EMAIL PROTECTED]\0 T [EMAIL PROTECTED]\0 \0\0 This should be: [EMAIL PROTECTED]\[EMAIL PROTECTED]\0\0 Is that what you meant? open \*STDIN, MSG; open \*STDOUT, ENV; Er, off the top of my head, you want to reverse that wokka, since STDOUT is an output stream. Like: open \*STDIN, MSG; open \*STDOUT, ENV; Any luck with this? Anyway, it seems to be a lot of overkill. Just iterate over your lists and invoke ezmlm-send for each one. Done. Thanks, I'll look into that, but I think a little more explicit documentation on qmail-queue would be helpful. John Levine just threw together a Perl module that invokes qmail-queue directly. See [http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=qmailm=99016757917465w=2]; it might be helpful. (I'm actually already using it...it is *really* nice. :-) /pg -- Peter Green : Architekton Internet Services, LLC : [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Q. Why is this so clumsy? A. The trick is to use Perl's strengths rather than its weaknesses. --- Larry Wall in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Qmail with amavis
Hi All, I'd like to know if someone in the list are using qmail with amavis-perl 11 in a Slackware 7.1 box? Thank's! -Connect On Internet Provider http://www.connecton.com.brFone: 55-11-4655-2232Francisco André Barbosa Neto[EMAIL PROTECTED]-
Re: R: leave a copy of messages on server
Medi Montaseri([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.05.21 12:11:25 +: I have the opposit question, is it possible to mandate delete? That is, can I mandate the all messages be downloaded from a POP server? it would probably break the protocol. /k -- Black holes are where GOD is dividing by zero KR433/KR11-RIPE -- WebMonster Community Founder -- nGENn GmbH Senior Techie http://www.webmonster.de/ -- ftp://ftp.webmonster.de/ -- http://www.ngenn.net/ karstenrohrbach.de -- alphangenn.net -- alphascene.org -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG 0x2964BF46 2001-03-15 42F9 9FFF 50D4 2F38 DBEE DF22 3340 4F4E 2964 BF46
Re: Timeout issues.
most probably it is the dns setup. if you do not need to know the names of clients that are connecting, tcpserver -RHl0 is probably what you want. this won't work out with tcprules files that carry = for evaluating the $TCPREMOTEHOST variable. you might check the docs to tcpserver and tcprules: http://cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp.html cheers, /k Hank Wethington([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.05.21 11:02:10 +: I have about 6 qmail servers up and running in different parts of California. For the most part life has been pretty easy with them. I have 3 machines giving me a headache currently and was hoping for some help. (I know 50% is a failing number) #1) A local machine running RH Linux and qmail 1.03. It had been running great for the last 9 months. I recently had an IP change on the machine as I switched DSL providers. I made sure all of the control files got changed and the new tcp rules added. However, it appears to not want to pop mail with out a long delay. My windows clients need to keep hitting wait. It eventually works, but it is very frustrating, considering it worked fine before the IP change. My guess is it relates to DNS. Am I on the right track, or has anyone else seen this? Is there a way I can fix it without long phone calls to my provider educating them on DNS and stuff :) #2) Is rather similar. Was built in house (RH Linux and qmail 1.03)and then sent out. Worked fine here, however in the clients location they get constant timeouts on SMTP and need to keep hitting wait as well. I am using the -R in the tcpserver startup so that it won't try to resolve the local IPs, but it is still happening. #3) Similar still. A large mail server I just built using Matt's BSD-qmail toaster setup. In house worked fantastic. Bring it in the field for a small ISP, and even trying to do a localhost port 25 connection is taking sometimes 10 minutes!?! All of these problems seem related and it is probably something really simple that is driving me crazy. If anyone has input on what I'm doing wrong I'd really appreciate it. Hank Wethington Information Logistics Information Logistics www.GoInfoLogistics.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- I can emulate the Beta-version of every C #include signal.h program I've ever written in two lines! - main() {raise(11);} KR433/KR11-RIPE -- WebMonster Community Founder -- nGENn GmbH Senior Techie http://www.webmonster.de/ -- ftp://ftp.webmonster.de/ -- http://www.ngenn.net/ karstenrohrbach.de -- alphangenn.net -- alphascene.org -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG 0x2964BF46 2001-03-15 42F9 9FFF 50D4 2F38 DBEE DF22 3340 4F4E 2964 BF46
Re: R: R: leave a copy of messages on server
I think you may do it, but you must modify your pop3 server. It should memorize the downloaded messages numbers and then execute the opportune dele # at the end of session (or immediately after RETR command, when a new command is given and it may be sure that previous RETR has completed). Or... If I'm not wrong, all read messages are moved to ../Maildir/cur, so you could delete all messages in those ../Maildir/cur directories. Tonino At 22/05/2001 22/05/2001 +0200, Andrea Cerrito wrote: Mmmmhhh, I don't think it's possible. Anyway, you can set a crontab to delete old messages (ie: 30 days old) or you can set quota. It's not advisable to make the delete mandatory because: 1) user may want to look his/her messages from a location, and to download them from another one, 2) the data transfer may fail for some reason (and you force deletion of a message unread by user) Good work --- Cordiali saluti / Best regards Andrea Cerrito ^^ Net.Admin @ Centro MultiMediale di Terni S.p.A. P.zzale Bosco 3A 05100 Terni IT Tel. +39 744 5441330 Fax. +39 744 5441372 -Messaggio originale- Da: medi [mailto:medi]Per conto di Medi Montaseri Inviato: lunedì 21 maggio 2001 21.11 A: Andrea Cerrito Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Oggetto: Re: R: leave a copy of messages on server I have the opposit question, is it possible to mandate delete? That is, can I mandate the all messages be downloaded from a POP server? Andrea Cerrito wrote: Mmmm... strange. A normal pop3 session is like ... stat retr #num dele #num and if you set leave a copy... the dele action is never done. Try to telnet to your box and act as a mail client: you'll be able to know if it's a problem with qmail (I don't think so, anyway) or with your client. I mean +OK [EMAIL PROTECTED] user $YOURUSER +OK pass $YOURPASS +OK stat +OK 1 1228 retr 1 bla bla bla bla bla quit +OK then reconnect and see if the message is still alive. Good luck --- Cordiali saluti / Best regards Andrea Cerrito ^^ Net.Admin @ Centro MultiMediale di Terni S.p.A. P.zzale Bosco 3A 05100 Terni IT Tel. +39 744 5441330 Fax. +39 744 5441372 -Messaggio originale- Da: Roberto Marzialetti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Inviato: lunedì 21 maggio 2001 18.39 A: Qmail List Oggetto: leave a copy of messages on server Hi boys have got a problem... well... if i active the option leave a copy of messages on server on my email client, the messages doesn't leave on my server :o(( have you got some solution ? many thanks Roberto -- === Medi Montaseri, [EMAIL PROTECTED], 408-450-7114 Prepass Inc, IT/Operations, Software Eng. ===
how control smtp relay
Hello, i've many User the works with dhcp, so i can't set the ip or ip range in /etc/tcp.smtp file. How can i control this user, i want that only this users work with the smtp server. In the moment can anybody send (relaying). Can i filter, that the recipient or the sender must have definite domain address? (for example to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Thanks for the help best regards Gustav -- Machen Sie Ihr Hobby zu Geld bei unserem Partner 11! http://profiseller.de/info/index.php3?ac=OM.PS.PS003K00596T0409a -- GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet. http://www.gmx.net
Re: leave a copy of messages on server
Hi guys, isaac... -- isaac -- When a message is read but not cleared, qmail moves the message from the Maildir/new directory to Maildir/cur directory and appends :2, to the end of the message. yeah... i had seen :o) From what information I could find regarding this problem, it all boils down to the client email application and its POP functionality, not qmail. i solved my problem starting qmail-pop3d by tcpserver. -- peter --- It does exactly what you tell it to. What is the problem? Please state what you expected the computer to do, and what it did instead. oky, excuse me :oP may many many thanks Roberto
Re: qmail-pop3d and /var/spool/mail or NO /HOME/$USER
Charles Olds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My goal is: Install qmail to work with virtual users. (i.e. No account in /etc/passwd. No /home/user. Mail delivered to /var/spool/mail.) You're limiting your options here by insisting on mbox format and /var/spool/mail. Much of the better software intended to be used with qmail uses Maildir format, and storage outside of /var/spool/mail . I have downloaded and installed qmail, tcpserver, qmailadmin, etc.. Everything looks good and runs except qmail-pop3d does not work with virtual users. When trying to retrieve mail I get the message No /HOME/$USER directory... Please recommend a POP3 server that will work with qmail and allow mail to be retrieved from /var/spool/mail. I'd personally recommend vmailmgr for virtual domain setups. However, it does necessitate Maildir storage (well, mostly) and at least one system account per virtual domain. Charles -- --- Charles Cazabon[EMAIL PROTECTED] GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions. ---
Re: Qmail with amavis
Hi All, I'd like to know if someone in the list are using qmail with amavis-perl 11 in a Slackware 7.1 box? Thank's! Francisco André Barbosa Neto I am. Best Regards, -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Eduardo Augusto Alvarenga - Analista de Suporte - #179653 Blumenau - Santa Catarina. Tel. (47) 9102-3303 http://www.netron.com.br/~eduardo -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
10 Million Messages per day
Hi, If I have 10 Million messages per day. What system requirement do I need for a qmail server. Etc. Memory.. CPU.. Bandwidth... Thank you Mark
Re: 10 Million Messages per day
On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 11:15:48PM +0800, Mark Lo wrote: If I have 10 Million messages per day. What system requirement do I need for a qmail server. Etc. Memory.. CPU.. Bandwidth... 10 000 000 of inbound, outbound or transit EMails? What is typical size? do you need also POP3/IMAP? What is expected load on POP3/IMAP? Are you sure you're going to get 10 000 000, not 100 000? Alex.
Re: 10 Million Messages per day
Mark Lo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If I have 10 Million messages per day. What system requirement do I need for a qmail server. Etc. Memory.. CPU.. Bandwidth... You need to specify your requirements much more precisely for us to help you. For instance: 1) 10M messages -- what size messages? 2) Is this ten million copies of a single identical message (i.e., the same message text to each of ten million recipients)? Or is this ten million personalized messages, each to a single recipient? 3) What sort of latency is acceptable to you? Do you require that all recipients (well, those whose mailservers don't defer the delivery) recieve it within 2 hours? Or 20 minutes? Or is 24 hours acceptable? 4) Are the recipients local? Virtual? Remote-to-close-networks? Remote-to-the-net-at-large? The 10M number implies an answer to this question, but we don't want to assume incorrectly. The list archive is full of discussions on large/huge mailing lists and hardware required to host them. Try searching the archive. You can find pointers to it at qmail.org. Charles -- --- Charles Cazabon[EMAIL PROTECTED] GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions. ---
Re: 10 Million Messages per day
Yeh.. 10 Million outbound messages... - Original Message - From: Alex Povolotsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Mark Lo [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 11:34 PM Subject: Re: 10 Million Messages per day On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 11:15:48PM +0800, Mark Lo wrote: If I have 10 Million messages per day. What system requirement do I need for a qmail server. Etc. Memory.. CPU.. Bandwidth... 10 000 000 of inbound, outbound or transit EMails? What is typical size? do you need also POP3/IMAP? What is expected load on POP3/IMAP? Are you sure you're going to get 10 000 000, not 100 000? Alex.
/var/qmail/alias/.qmail-default vs virtualdomains
Hi, I'd like to know if it's possible to edit the /var/qmail/alias/.qmail- default file, so instead of it having a username or email address to deliver messages for undefined users to, you have a defined path to a specific mailbox. ie: /home/bubba/Maildir/ The reason I ask is because we provide and internet fax service, and we recieve messages addressed to a-fax-number@domain.com Obviously I can setup a user account for every possible fax number, so we deliver anything undefined to 1 mailbox. THe problem is that in the default setup qmail changes the Delivered To: address to the user listed in the /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-default file. And if I use the virtualdomain feature it prepends the username defined for that domain to the Delivered To: field. Niether option is particularly useful, as we need to see the fax number unmodified. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Dean Dean Staff Protus IP Solutions 210 - 2379 Holly Lane Ottawa, ON K1V 7P2 Canada 613-733- ex 546 Fax 613-248-4553 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.protus.com
Re: 10 Million Messages per day
Mark Lo writes: Hi, If I have 10 Million messages per day. What system requirement do I need for a qmail server. Etc. Memory.. CPU.. Bandwidth... Have a look at the inter7 homepage (www.inter7.com). They offer preconfiguerd qmail server for low, medium and high usage. That will give you an idea, i guess. Regards, Philipp Philipp Steinkrüger Technik Oberberg Online Tel.: +49 2261 814240 Fax: +49 2261 814919 www.oberberg.net [EMAIL PROTECTED]
manymanymany splogger processes
Anyone have a guess why qmail is running thousands of copies of splogger? I just sent out a sizable mailing, so I expect the server to be busy and working hard, but seriously... thousands of copies of splogger? Is it /supposed/ to run a new instance for each outgoing message? --joshua.
Re: manymanymany splogger processes
On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 12:12:04PM -0400, Ahead of the Street wrote: Anyone have a guess why qmail is running thousands of copies of splogger? We don't guess. We give answers, if you ask questions. I just sent out a sizable mailing, so I expect the server to be busy and working hard, but seriously... thousands of copies of splogger? Is it /supposed/ to run a new instance for each outgoing message? No, not at all. You are obviously doing something wrong. Please provide more detail: - how are you starting qmail - how are you sending out the mailing - are the splogger processes visibly doing something towards syslog and any other details that are relevant. Greetz, Peter.
Re: /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-default vs virtualdomains
Dean Staff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd like to know if it's possible to edit the /var/qmail/alias/.qmail- default file, so instead of it having a username or email address to deliver messages for undefined users to, you have a defined path to a specific mailbox. ie: /home/bubba/Maildir/ The reason I ask is because we provide and internet fax service, and we recieve messages addressed to a-fax-number@domain.com Obviously I can setup a user account for every possible fax number, so we deliver anything undefined to 1 mailbox. THe problem is that in the default setup qmail changes the Delivered To: address to the user listed in the /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-default file. And if I use the virtualdomain feature it prepends the username defined for that domain to the Delivered To: field. Niether option is particularly useful, as we need to see the fax number unmodified. Perhaps you could try this: -make the domain virtual. For instance, dom.net:virtuser1 in virtualdomains. -have .qmail files in ~virtuser1 to handle the real users, if any: ~virtuser1/.qmail-joe contains /home/virtuser1/Mail/joe/ or similar. This could be a vmailmgr domain perhaps? -have ~virtuser1/.qmail-default to handle all the fax numbers. You can then refer to $DEFAULT in a script to get the original mail address (fax number). `man qmail-command` and `man dot-qmail` for details. Charles -- --- Charles Cazabon[EMAIL PROTECTED] GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions. ---
RE: qmail + vpopmail + maildrop + sqwebmail 2.0.0
You can try Matt's FreeBSD-Qmail toaster. Although he doesn't use maildrop in there. I added it with the qmailqueue to check for VBS scripts before delivering e-mail without much of a problem. Check it out http://matt.simerson.net/computing/qmail.toaster.shtml Hank Wethington Information Logistics Information Logistics www.GoInfoLogistics.com mailto:info.at.GoInfoLogistics.com -Original Message- From: Roy Svendsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 1:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: qmail + vpopmail + maildrop + sqwebmail 2.0.0 Hi! Anyone that have put opp something like this? How do I set up Maildrop too work under vpopmail so I can build filter with sqwebmail 2.0.0 Have'nt found any good information on this one! Best regard -- Roy Svendsen Life is like an potato!
Re: pulling mail from other than new/cur (sorry again...better reply address)
Dave Sill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sure you can - rather stupid buying the cake in the first place if you can't eat it ;-) No you can't. If you eat it, you no longer have it. Of course, you could eat half of it and still have half of it. :-) Yes you do still have it. Might not be quite as accessable after eating it and I'm not sure you'd want to get it back. But you still have it for the next 24-48 hours and possibly longer if you like Mr. Hankey. :-) Paul. -- | Paul Gregg|T: +44 (0) 28 90424190 | Technical Director|F: +44 (0) 28 90424709 | The Internet Business Ltd |W: http://www.tibus.com | Holywood House, Innis Court |E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Holywood, Co Down, BT18 9HF |P: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: manymanymany splogger processes
Sorry about the long posting, but at least everythings in one place. It seems to me that qmail-pop3d is not running correctly, thus explaining the errors in /var/log/maillog, but is that also causing my splogger process problem? I just sent out a sizable mailing, so I expect the server to be busy and working hard, but seriously... thousands of copies of splogger? Is it /supposed/ to run a new instance for each outgoing message? No, not at all. You are obviously doing something wrong. Please provide more detail: - how are you starting qmail With supervise. I've added several key files below for a more complete reference. - how are you sending out the mailing It's a perl script that uses sendmail, but it is the qmail replacement for sendmail. - are the splogger processes visibly doing something towards syslog Well, /var/log/maillog has tons of these error messages: May 22 11:31:57 nsc pop3d: 990545517.798654 tcpserver: fatal: unable to bind: address already used FILES: /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-send/run --- #!/bin/sh exec /var/qmail/rc --- /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-send/log/run --- #!/bin/sh exec /usr/local/bin/setuidgid qmaill /usr/local/bin/multilog t s250 /var/log/qmail/qmail-send --- /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-pop3d/run --- #!/bin/sh tcpserver -v -R 0 pop3 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup mail.nextstepcapital.net /bin/ \ checkpassword /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir 21 | /var/qmail/bin/splogger \ pop3d --- /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-pop3d/log/run --- #!/bin/sh exec /usr/local/bin/setuidgid qmaill /usr/local/bin/multilog t s250 /var/log/qmail/qmail-pop3d --- /etc/rc.d/init.d/qmail --- #!/bin/sh -e # /etc/init.d/qmail : start or stop the qmail mail subsystem. # borrowed from http://Web.InfoAve.Net/~dsill/lwq.html#start-qmail # modified by Adam McKenna [EMAIL PROTECTED] PATH=$PATH:/usr/local/bin:/var/qmail/bin case $1 in start) echo -n Starting mail-transport-agent: svc -u /var/qmail/supervise/* echo -n qmail svc -u /var/qmail/supervise/*/log echo logging. ;; stop) echo -n Stopping mail-transport-agent: echo -n qmail svc -d /var/qmail/supervise/* echo logging svc -d /var/qmail/supervise/*/log ;; restart) $0 stop $0 start ;; reload|force-reload) echo Reloading 'locals' and 'virtualdomains' control files. svc -h /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-send ;; *) echo 'Usage: /etc/init.d/qmail {start|stop|restart|reload}' exit 1 esac exit 0 --- /etc/rc.local (partial) --- /etc/init.d/svscan start tcpserver 0 110 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup mail.nextstepcapital.net \ /bin/checkpassword /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir ---
qmail-pop3d advice ( migrate to vpopmail ? )
Hi all, I have a server which has about 50.000 e-mail accounts. POP3 concurrency is set to 150 and timeout to 90 seconds. A couple of days ago, my users started to feel a huge delay in getting their messages via POP and sometimes, they even cannot connect. I checked the number of simultaneous number of connections and is not close to 150. Of course, concurrency increased a little bit ( around 100 ) in the past few days, but it didn't reach the limit yet. I think my machine is on its knees right now :((, but I cannot afford to have a better hardware at this moment. What can I do to improve performance ? ( I mean software performance... ). The migrating to vpopmail would help ? What about mysql to authenticate users ? Thanks Renato - Brazil P.S. I'm using qmail+vmailmgr, so I have thousands of passwd.cdb files...
Re: manymanymany splogger processes
On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 01:43:46PM -0400, Joshua Nichols wrote: [snip] FILES: /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-send/run --- #!/bin/sh exec /var/qmail/rc --- Looks good, as long as there is no in /var/qmail/rc /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-send/log/run --- #!/bin/sh exec /usr/local/bin/setuidgid qmaill /usr/local/bin/multilog t s250 /var/log/qmail/qmail-send --- Looks good. /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-pop3d/run --- #!/bin/sh tcpserver -v -R 0 pop3 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup mail.nextstepcapital.net /bin/ \ checkpassword /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir 21 | /var/qmail/bin/splogger \ pop3d --- You should remove everything behind the | (and the | itself) here. Logging is handled by multilog as you show below, and the at the end makes it all respawn way often. /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-pop3d/log/run --- #!/bin/sh exec /usr/local/bin/setuidgid qmaill /usr/local/bin/multilog t s250 /var/log/qmail/qmail-pop3d --- Looks good. [snip] /etc/rc.local (partial) --- /etc/init.d/svscan start tcpserver 0 110 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup mail.nextstepcapital.net \ /bin/checkpassword /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir --- You can remove the tcpserver line, this is handled by the qmail-pop3d supervise. Greetz, Peter.
RE: manymanymany splogger processes
Sorry about this but this is a junkyard. read on On Tuesday, May 22, 2001 19:44, Joshua Nichols [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: Sorry about the long posting, but at least everythings in one place. It seems to me that qmail-pop3d is not running correctly, thus explaining the errors in /var/log/maillog, but is that also causing my splogger process problem? I just sent out a sizable mailing, so I expect the server to be busy and working hard, but seriously... thousands of copies of splogger? Is it /supposed/ to run a new instance for each outgoing message? No, not at all. You are obviously doing something wrong. Please provide more detail: - how are you starting qmail With supervise. I've added several key files below for a more complete reference. - how are you sending out the mailing It's a perl script that uses sendmail, but it is the qmail replacement for sendmail. - are the splogger processes visibly doing something towards syslog Well, /var/log/maillog has tons of these error messages: May 22 11:31:57 nsc pop3d: 990545517.798654 tcpserver: fatal: unable to bind: address already used FILES: /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-send/run --- #!/bin/sh exec /var/qmail/rc --- where is the contents of /var/qmail/rc ?? /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-send/log/run --- #!/bin/sh exec /usr/local/bin/setuidgid qmaill /usr/local/bin/multilog t s250 /var/log/qmail/qmail-send --- /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-pop3d/run --- #!/bin/sh tcpserver -v -R 0 pop3 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup mail.nextstepcapital.net /bin/ \ checkpassword /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir 21 | /var/qmail/bin/splogger \ pop3d --- remove the | /var/qmail/bin/splogger pop3d from the above script the logging is done in /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-pop3d/log/run this is why you get a lot of splogger processes /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-pop3d/log/run --- #!/bin/sh exec /usr/local/bin/setuidgid qmaill /usr/local/bin/multilog t s250 /var/log/qmail/qmail-pop3d --- /etc/rc.d/init.d/qmail --- #!/bin/sh -e # /etc/init.d/qmail : start or stop the qmail mail subsystem. # borrowed from http://Web.InfoAve.Net/~dsill/lwq.html#start-qmail # modified by Adam McKenna [EMAIL PROTECTED] PATH=$PATH:/usr/local/bin:/var/qmail/bin case $1 in start) echo -n Starting mail-transport-agent: svc -u /var/qmail/supervise/* echo -n qmail svc -u /var/qmail/supervise/*/log echo logging. ;; stop) echo -n Stopping mail-transport-agent: echo -n qmail svc -d /var/qmail/supervise/* echo logging svc -d /var/qmail/supervise/*/log ;; restart) $0 stop $0 start ;; reload|force-reload) echo Reloading 'locals' and 'virtualdomains' control files. svc -h /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-send ;; *) echo 'Usage: /etc/init.d/qmail {start|stop|restart|reload}' exit 1 esac exit 0 --- /etc/rc.local (partial) --- /etc/init.d/svscan start tcpserver 0 110 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup mail.nextstepcapital.net \ /bin/checkpassword /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir --- remove tcpserver 0 110 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup mail.nextstepcapital.net \ /bin/checkpassword /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir because qmail-popup is already running under supervise this is why you get the error message fatal: unable to bind: address already used
Re: qmail-pop3d advice ( migrate to vpopmail ? )
Renato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, Don't post a new question by replying to an existing thread. This messes up the threading in our MUAs and in the list archives. As for your problem: it's the absolute #1 most frequently asked question. It's in the FAQs, it's in the list archives hundreds of times, and its even in one mailing list member's .sig. Charles -- --- Charles Cazabon[EMAIL PROTECTED] GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions. ---
Re: 10 Million Messages per day
In my opinion, design your system as wide as possible and not as tall as possible. ie use a bunch of computers instead of one single tall one. Alex Povolotsky wrote: On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 11:15:48PM +0800, Mark Lo wrote: > If I have 10 Million messages per day. What system requirement do I > need for a qmail server. Etc. Memory.. CPU.. Bandwidth... 10 000 000 of inbound, outbound or transit EMails? What is typical size? do you need also POP3/IMAP? What is expected load on POP3/IMAP? Are you sure you're going to get 10 000 000, not 100 000? Alex. -- === Medi Montaseri, [EMAIL PROTECTED], 408-450-7114 Prepass Inc, IT/Operations, Software Eng. ===
RE: how control smtp relay
i've many User the works with dhcp, so i can't set the ip or ip range in /etc/tcp.smtp file. How can i control this user, i want that only this users work with the smtp server. In the moment can anybody send (relaying). Can i filter, that the recipient or the sender must have definite domain address? (for example to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 'To' and 'From' fields can be forged. Try using relay-control. On the www.qmail.org, search keyword 'relay-control'. best regards, Dai yuwen __ === ÐÂÀËÃâ·Ñµç×ÓÓÊÏä (http://mail.sina.com.cn) Ñ°ÕÒÐÂÏÊ, Ó®¿ÆÁú±ùÏä! (http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;2847753;5579344;y?http://gd.sina.com.cn/ad/kelon) ʹÓÃÊÖ»ú¶ÌÐÅ¡°ÓʼþÌáÐÑ¡±¹¦ÄÜ£¬ËæʱÁ˽âµÄÊÕÐÂÐÅÇé¿ö£¡ (http://sms.sina.com.cn/docs/sina_mailalert.html)
gcc programming with qmail
Title: gcc programming with qmail Hello i want to develop an application which can send mail through the qmail system. could you please give me a starting point of this? i don't know how to do it thanks KY
Problems with SMTP connections
Hey, I'm pretty new to qmail, so I apologize in advance if my question is a but mundane. I have read all the INSTALL docs and the FAQ, so I hope I haven't overlooked anything. Here's the deal: Everything gets delivered locally just fine. Even remotely to certain domains. However, when sending messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED], my logs tell me that qmail could not establish an SMTP connection with those servers. I telnet to 25 on a given server, and sure enough, I can't get a connection. However, I know these domains are receiving. Should I be running a local DNS server? If so, I don't see why. Perhaps I'm just a gimp and I overlooked a config file. Any help is appreciated. Flames are welcome to my email address so as not to clog up the mailing list. Thanks again, -- Graham
Re: Problems with SMTP connections
Hey, I'm pretty new to qmail, so I apologize in advance if my question is a but mundane. I have read all the INSTALL docs and the FAQ, so I hope I haven't overlooked anything. Here's the deal: Everything gets delivered locally just fine. Even remotely to certain domains. However, when sending messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED], my logs tell me that qmail could not establish an SMTP connection with those servers. I telnet to 25 on a given server, and sure enough, I can't get a connection. However, I know these domains are receiving. Should I be running a local DNS server? If so, I don't see why. Perhaps I'm just a gimp and I overlooked a config file. You can't get a connection ONLY from your server ? Or from you hole link ? If only particular from your server, try tracing the route to these hosts, from a working machine and from the server. Since you can receive/send to a couple of other domains with 100% success, it looks like you are on a network/routing trouble. Any help is appreciated. Flames are welcome to my email address so as not to clog up the mailing list. Thanks again, -- Graham Best Regards, -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Eduardo Augusto Alvarenga - Analista de Suporte - #179653 Blumenau - Santa Catarina. Tel. (47) 9102-3303 http://www.netron.com.br/~eduardo -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- /\ \ / Campanha da Fita ASCII - Contra Mail HTML X ASCII Ribbon Campaign - Against HTML Mail / \
webmail recommendations?
I've just started an email server evaluation to provide a complete email solution including POP3, SMTP, and webmail. We're already strongly thinking qmail is a good place to start, but it does not have native webmail support. We do not need IMAP. So far, the webmail servers on the floor are: oMail-webmail NeoMail AtDot EmuMail Does anybody have any good/bad experience with these? Do they integrate well with qmail? We're hoping to use maildir format. I know oMail supports it, but from a perusal of the websites, I'm not certain if the others do. Also, can anybody suggest any other webmail servers that integrate well with qmail? Any comments appreciated. Thanks, -Eric P. --- arctic bears - the internet - your way. email hosting from US$8/month, domains from US$19/year. http://www.arcticbears.com
Re: webmail recommendations?
Eric Paynter wrote: I've just started an email server evaluation to provide a complete email solution including POP3, SMTP, and webmail. We're already strongly thinking qmail is a good place to start, but it does not have native webmail support. We do not need IMAP. So far, the webmail servers on the floor are: oMail-webmail NeoMail AtDot EmuMail Does anybody have any good/bad experience with these? Do they integrate well with qmail? We're hoping to use maildir format. I know oMail supports it, but from a perusal of the websites, I'm not certain if the others do. Also, can anybody suggest any other webmail servers that integrate well with qmail? Any comments appreciated. Thanks, -Eric P. --- arctic bears - the internet - your way. email hosting from US$8/month, domains from US$19/year. http://www.arcticbears.com I've found courier sqwebmail to be a good solution. Works nicely with maildir's and is free (not sure about commercial licensing though). Has all sorts of different method you can use for authentication. Chris
Re: webmail recommendations?
Eric, Check out Vpopmail at www.inter7.com. Works quite well. John Chapman From: Eric Paynter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:webmail recommendations? Date sent: Tue, 22 May 2001 20:14:40 -0700 I've just started an email server evaluation to provide a complete email solution including POP3, SMTP, and webmail. We're already strongly thinking qmail is a good place to start, but it does not have native webmail support. We do not need IMAP. So far, the webmail servers on the floor are: oMail-webmail NeoMail AtDot EmuMail Does anybody have any good/bad experience with these? Do they integrate well with qmail? We're hoping to use maildir format. I know oMail supports it, but from a perusal of the websites, I'm not certain if the others do. Also, can anybody suggest any other webmail servers that integrate well with qmail? Any comments appreciated. Thanks, -Eric P. --- arctic bears - the internet - your way. email hosting from US$8/month, domains from US$19/year. http://www.arcticbears.com
Re: webmail recommendations?
Eric Paynter wrote: I've just started an email server evaluation to provide a complete email solution including POP3, SMTP, and webmail. We're already strongly thinking qmail is a good place to start, but it does not have native webmail support. We do not need IMAP. So far, the webmail servers on the floor are: oMail-webmail NeoMail AtDot EmuMail Does anybody have any good/bad experience with these? Do they integrate well with qmail? We're hoping to use maildir format. I know oMail supports it, but from a perusal of the websites, I'm not certain if the others do. Also, can anybody suggest any other webmail servers that integrate well with qmail? Any comments appreciated. Thanks, -Eric P. --- arctic bears - the internet - your way. email hosting from US$8/month, domains from US$19/year. http://www.arcticbears.com Wrong!! Yes it does have webmail support, it's called sqwebmail good program and very fast, you can also use IMP. I will work with maildir no problem. Remo
Re: webmail recommendations?
On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 08:14:40PM -0700, Eric Paynter wrote: We do not need IMAP. So far, the webmail servers on the floor are: oMail-webmail ok (hopefully :) will work with vpopmail. NeoMail not for maildirs... AtDot EmuMail pop3-based mailers afaik + sqwebmail + imp + dwebmail (look on freshmeat) Regards, Olivier -- _ Olivier Mueller - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - PGPkeyID: 0E84D2EA - Switzerland qmail projects: http://omail.omnis.ch - http://webmail.omnis.ch