Re: Go on developing qmail!!!!

2001-05-22 Thread Liu Hong


We can build a mail list to discuss this.

My idea is :
 * build a core develop group
 * build a document group
 * build a user support group
 * invite patch author join core develope group and neaten all patchs,include some 
patch into the new version



-

You go, girl!

How about...maybe...a few suggestions. We like suggestions for the
following:

* Things which haven't yet been proved wrong, impossible, stupid, or
otherwise, beyond all reasonable doubt.

* Things which haven't been documented *anywhere*

* Things which are currently contained in patches

* Things which make qmail faster

Thankyou.
-- 
Is OS/2 only half an operating system ?


Sending mail to another machine

2001-05-22 Thread Mohamed Ould

Hello,

1- I'm using Qmail following LWQ of Dave Sill with
a Relay in DMZ + Server in LAN.
I want now to tell Relay machine to send mails of certains users  to
any machine lying anwhere (in DMZ, LAN or Internet), instead to
sending them always to my LAN-server.
How I can do this?
Is this needs to install Qmail, create new user's account on machines?

2- Sendmail demon was installed by default on all my machines, it
allowing me before
to send mails for root or user ( logs, alert, etc...). I deinstallating
it, but as a result mail can't be sent now.
What to do in order to allow machines in DMZ or LAN  where Qmail is
not installed to just sent messages like alert, logs, etc. to root
account or any other user?
I'm heared about a qmail-client, or a particular installation of
sendmail which allow us to do this. Can you give
helps, url, ...? Is maintaining sendmail demon
on my machines can compromise security?

PS: I lincked sendmail to qmail as indicated in LWQ on both my relay and

server.


Thanks




Re: Sending mail to another machine

2001-05-22 Thread Ruprecht Helms

At 09:56 22.05.01 +0200, Mohamed Ould wrote:
Hello,

1- I'm using Qmail following LWQ of Dave Sill with
a Relay in DMZ + Server in LAN.
I want now to tell Relay machine to send mails of certains users  to
any machine lying anwhere (in DMZ, LAN or Internet), instead to
sending them always to my LAN-server.
How I can do this?
Is this needs to install Qmail, create new user's account on machines?

A good way is to use virtual domains. In webmin there is an external module 
for qmail to handle virtual domains.


2- Sendmail demon was installed by default on all my machines, it
allowing me before
to send mails for root or user ( logs, alert, etc...). I deinstallating
it, but as a result mail can't be sent now.

You have to make a symbolic link to the sendmail of qmail. Much programs 
are looking for sendmail and you have to place the link on the old place of 
sendmail.

What to do in order to allow machines in DMZ or LAN  where Qmail is
not installed to just sent messages like alert, logs, etc. to root
account or any other user?

On the DMZ i prefere to install qmail because of security. On the hosts
in the dmz there should be disabled all services that are not needed. Think 
about good rules for the firewall. In ipchains you have three chains the 
input chain, the forward chain and the outputchain. You can build rules 
such good-bad, dmz-bad, dmz-good,...

I'm heared about a qmail-client, or a particular installation of
sendmail

http://www.sendmail.org or you are looking in a searchengine for postfix or 
exim.

Regards,
Ruprecht




Re: Go on developing qmail!!!!

2001-05-22 Thread Ruprecht Helms

At 14:22 22.05.01 +0800, Liu Hong wrote:

We can build a mail list to discuss this.

My idea is :
  * build a core develop group
  * build a document group
  * build a user support group
  * invite patch author join core develope group and neaten all 
 patchs,include some patch into the new version

The best way is to use qmail with ezmlm (http://www.ezmlm.org)
In the faq you will find how to build mailing-lists. The handling is
exclusive by sending mails to different adresses. For subscribing you send 
only a blanko-email to list-subscribe@listserver.

Regards,
Ruprecht




badrcptto

2001-05-22 Thread Brian Moon

Ok, so I got the badrcptto patch working.  It doesn't look like it will do
partial addresses.  You know how badmailfrom will let you just put in
@domain.com.  I was hoping that this patch might let you put in user@ and
reject all mail for that user regardless of domain.  I don't really follow
the C code well, so I don't see how to do this.

Any ideas?

Brian Moon
--
dealnews.com, Inc.
Makers of dealnews, dealmac
http://dealnews.com/ | http://dealmac.com/






Re: badrcptto

2001-05-22 Thread Brian Moon

Ok, I am looking really hard at the code here.  It looks like the @ magic of
badmailfrom is somewhere in here which was copied directly for badrcpto:

  j = byte_rchr(addr.s,addr.len,'@');
  if (j  addr.len)
if (constmap(mapbrt,addr.s + j,addr.len - j - 1)) return 1;

I am still not sure exactly what this is saying though.  I know in psuedo
code terms, but I can not figure out how to change it to make it work at
matching user@.

Any ideas?

Brian Moon
--
dealnews.com, Inc.
Makers of dealnews, dealmac
http://dealnews.com/ | http://dealmac.com/


- Original Message -
From: Brian Moon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 3:49 AM
Subject: badrcptto


 Ok, so I got the badrcptto patch working.  It doesn't look like it will do
 partial addresses.  You know how badmailfrom will let you just put in
 @domain.com.  I was hoping that this patch might let you put in user@ and
 reject all mail for that user regardless of domain.  I don't really follow
 the C code well, so I don't see how to do this.

 Any ideas?

 Brian Moon
 --
 dealnews.com, Inc.
 Makers of dealnews, dealmac
 http://dealnews.com/ | http://dealmac.com/









qmail + vpopmail + maildrop + sqwebmail 2.0.0

2001-05-22 Thread Roy Svendsen



Hi! Anyone that have put opp 
something like this? How do I set up Maildrop too work under vpopmail so 
I can build filter with sqwebmail 2.0.0 
Have'nt found any good information on this 
one!
Best regard 
--Roy Svendsen

Life is like an potato!




qmail Digest 22 May 2001 10:00:00 -0000 Issue 1372

2001-05-22 Thread qmail-digest-help


qmail Digest 22 May 2001 10:00:00 - Issue 1372

Topics (messages 62798 through 62838):

Re: qmail as 'proxy' - comments?
62798 by: Peter van Dijk
62802 by: Brett Randall

minifaq
62799 by: Tim Titzmann
62803 by: Peter van Dijk

Spamcontrol trouble
62800 by: Philipp Steinkrüger

Re: qmail + mutt
62801 by: Karsten W. Rohrbach

Re: Administrivia: Move to EZMLM]
62804 by: Mate Wierdl

How redirect mail to another server
62805 by: Mohamed Ould

leave a copy of messages on server
62806 by: Roberto Marzialetti
62808 by: Greg White
62809 by: Peter van Dijk
62810 by: Isaac Chapman
62817 by: Peter van Dijk
62823 by: Jim Steele

R: leave a copy of messages on server
62807 by: Andrea Cerrito
62816 by: Medi Montaseri

Timeout issues.
62811 by: Hank Wethington
62820 by: Chris Johnson

Compile problems with compilation of daemontools-0.70 on RH 7.1
62812 by: Ed Weinberg
62813 by: Ed Weinberg
62814 by: Carl J. Danowski
62815 by: Henning Brauer
62818 by: Ed Weinberg
62822 by: K. F. Yim

need a badmailto solution
62819 by: Brian Moon
62821 by: Frank Tegtmeyer
62824 by: Jim Steele

fastforward broke my email
62825 by: RC

Re: The best way to setup...
62826 by: Dean Staff

Re: injecting qmail-queue (asking again)
62827 by: Todd Finney
62828 by: peter green
62830 by: Todd Finney

Go on developing qmail
62829 by: Liu Hong
62831 by: Brett Randall
62832 by: Liu Hong
62835 by: Ruprecht Helms

Sending mail to another machine
62833 by: Mohamed Ould
62834 by: Ruprecht Helms

badrcptto
62836 by: Brian Moon
62837 by: Brian Moon

qmail + vpopmail + maildrop + sqwebmail 2.0.0
62838 by: Roy Svendsen

Administrivia:

To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe to the digest, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To bug my human owner, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To post to the list, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--



On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 02:40:54AM +0100, John P wrote:
 We run a Linux box (LRP) as a firewall on our office network. Currently
 ports 25 and 110 are portforwarded to an internal server which runs qmail
 (on RedHat 7.0).
 
 Is there any point in setting up a forwarding-only version of qmail (perhaps
 using QMTP?) on the firewall box, or on a separate box in say a DMZ? I know
 a 'mail proxy' like this is recommended for Sendmail in some network
 security books, and if we did it then the internal box would have no ports
 open to the outside world*, but with qmail's inherent security, is it
 necessary?

You could put qmail on the firewall host with qmail-qmqpc (check the
mini-qmail docs) so that no outside box talks to your internal
mailserver directly. Local queueing+smtproutes works too, ofcourse.

Whether this is needed for a qmail box itself is not a question - when
creating a secure system, you ignore that any specific bit is secure
and still secure everything around it.

 *although as I type this I'm guessing that POP3 would still need to go
 through to the internal server due to the user's home directories being on
 there

Yes, pop3 is not that easily fixed.

Greetz, Peter.




 Peter == Peter van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 02:40:54AM +0100, John P wrote:

 *although as I type this I'm guessing that POP3 would still need to go
 through to the internal server due to the user's home directories being on
 there

 Yes, pop3 is not that easily fixed.

Except with NFS. Not the greatest solution, but in a few cases I still
use it and it works *mainly* fine (except for transferring 10mb
attachments over 28.8k modem links...it doesn't like that much).
-- 
... File not found. Should I fake it? (Y/N)









On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 11:38:31AM +0200, Tim Titzmann wrote:
 

Talking about *mini* :)

Greetz, Peter.




Hello,

i am having trouble with qmail and the spamcontrol patch. i am
using qmail with vpopmail and the spamcontol patch. I have a tcp.smtp
file to allow clients to relay mail, and i have a roaming users system set 
up. 

Now what i want to do is to only allow deliveries to existing users on the 
system.
Therefore i added *@* to badrcptpatterns and a list of all account with a 
! in front of it.
 - Now every mail not in this list is rejected, and no system can relay 
mails. 

Whats wrong ? 

Here is how i start qmail: 

/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -x /home/vpopmail/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -v -u 71 -g 104 
smtp /usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd -rblackholes.mail-abuse.org 
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd 21 | /var/qmail/bin/splogger smtpd 2  

If you can please help me out... 

Best Regards,
Philipp Steinkrüger 

 
Philipp Steinkrüger 

Technik
Oberberg 

R: R: leave a copy of messages on server

2001-05-22 Thread Andrea Cerrito



Mmmmhhh, I don't think it's possible.
Anyway, you can set a crontab to delete old messages (ie: 30 days old) or 
you can set quota.

It's 
not advisable to make the delete mandatory because:

1) 
user may want to look his/her messages from a location, and to download them 
from another one,
2) the 
data transfer may fail for some reason (and you force deletion of a message 
unread by user)

Good 
work
---Cordiali saluti / Best regardsAndrea 
Cerrito^^Net.Admin @ Centro MultiMediale di Terni 
S.p.A.P.zzale Bosco 3A05100 Terni ITTel. +39 744 5441330Fax. +39 
744 5441372 

  -Messaggio originale-Da: medi [mailto:medi]Per 
  conto di Medi MontaseriInviato: lunedì 21 maggio 2001 
  21.11A: Andrea CerritoCc: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Oggetto: Re: R: leave a copy of messages on 
  serverI have the opposit question, is it possible to 
  mandate delete? That is, can I mandate the all messages be 
  downloaded from a POP server? 
  Andrea Cerrito wrote: 
  Mmmm... strange. 
A normal pop3 session is like 
... stat retr #num dele #num 
and if you set "leave a copy..." the dele action is never done. Try 
to telnet to your box and act as a mail client: you'll be able to know 
if it's a problem with qmail (I don't think so, anyway) or with your 
client. 
I mean 
+OK [EMAIL PROTECTED] user $YOURUSER +OK 
pass $YOURPASS +OK stat +OK 1 1228 retr 1 bla bla 
bla bla bla quit +OK 
then reconnect and see if the message is still alive. Good luck 
--- Cordiali saluti / Best regards Andrea Cerrito 
^^ Net.Admin @ Centro MultiMediale di Terni S.p.A. 
P.zzale Bosco 3A 05100 Terni IT Tel. +39 744 5441330 Fax. 
+39 744 5441372 
 -Messaggio originale-  Da: Roberto Marzialetti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]  
Inviato: lunedì 21 maggio 2001 18.39  A: Qmail List  
Oggetto: leave a copy of messages on serverHi 
boys   have got a problem...  well... if i active 
the option "leave a copy  of messages on server " on my email 
client, the messages  doesn't leave on my server :o((  
 have you got some solution ?   many thanks  
 Roberto  --
===
Medi Montaseri, [EMAIL PROTECTED], 408-450-7114
Prepass Inc, IT/Operations, Software Eng.
=== 



Re: injecting qmail-queue (asking again)

2001-05-22 Thread peter green

* Todd Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010522 01:09]:
 I thought about that, but it isn't really an ezmlm question 
 anymore.  There doesn't seem to be an example on using qmail-queue 
 anywhere.  It seems to me that there probably should be.

Fair enough.

 So make ezmlm-reject omit that behavior. `man ezmlm-reject`
 
 And give up the spam protection that this provides?  No thanks :).

There are ways of emulating this sort of spam protection with ezmlm-issubn;
a couple have been mentioned on the ezmlm list. Check the archives at
[http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ezmlm].

 Eek, why not invoke ezmlm-send for each list? `man ezmlm-send` No need 
 to
 mess with qmail-queue, I don't think.
 
 Yea, that sounds nice, but there isn't an example of using that outside 
 of a .qmail file, either.   I'd think that
 
 tfinney]$ cat ./list_monthly_announcement.txt | 
 /usr/local/bin/ezmlm/ezmlm-send /home/list/test/
 
 would work, but no dice.

That is indeed the syntax. I'm still pretty convinced that this is the best
way to do this; you might want to look into why that doesn't work,
regardless of any other solution.

   I created my message file, message.txt, and my envelope file
   envelope.txt.  AFAIK, they're in the correct format.
[...]
 I tried three different formats.  I believe the first is correct, but I 
 saw a few mentioning of the other two, and tried them.  I saw no 
 difference in running the script with any of them.
 
 F [EMAIL PROTECTED]\0
 T [EMAIL PROTECTED]\0
 \0\0

This should be:

  [EMAIL PROTECTED]\[EMAIL PROTECTED]\0\0

Is that what you meant?

   open \*STDIN,  MSG;
   open \*STDOUT, ENV;
 
 Er, off the top of my head, you want to reverse that wokka, since 
 STDOUT is
 an output stream. Like:
 
open \*STDIN,  MSG;
open \*STDOUT, ENV;

Any luck with this?

 Anyway, it seems to be a lot of overkill. Just iterate over your lists 
 and
 invoke ezmlm-send for each one. Done.
 
 Thanks, I'll look into that, but I think a little more explicit 
 documentation on qmail-queue would be helpful.

John Levine just threw together a Perl module that invokes qmail-queue
directly. See [http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=qmailm=99016757917465w=2];
it might be helpful. (I'm actually already using it...it is *really* nice.
:-)

/pg
-- 
Peter Green : Architekton Internet Services, LLC : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Q. Why is this so clumsy?
A. The trick is to use Perl's strengths rather than its weaknesses.
--- Larry Wall in [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Qmail with amavis

2001-05-22 Thread Francisco André Barbosa Neto



  
  Hi All, I'd like to know if someone in the 
list are using qmail with amavis-perl 11 in a Slackware 7.1 box?
  
  Thank's!


-Connect On Internet 
Provider http://www.connecton.com.brFone: 
55-11-4655-2232Francisco André Barbosa Neto[EMAIL PROTECTED]-


Re: R: leave a copy of messages on server

2001-05-22 Thread Karsten W. Rohrbach

Medi Montaseri([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.05.21 12:11:25 +:
 I have the opposit question, is it possible to mandate delete?
 That is, can I mandate the all messages  be downloaded from a POP server?
it would probably break the protocol.
/k

-- 
 Black holes are where GOD is dividing by zero
KR433/KR11-RIPE -- WebMonster Community Founder -- nGENn GmbH Senior Techie
http://www.webmonster.de/ -- ftp://ftp.webmonster.de/ -- http://www.ngenn.net/
karstenrohrbach.de -- alphangenn.net -- alphascene.org -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG 0x2964BF46 2001-03-15 42F9 9FFF 50D4 2F38 DBEE  DF22 3340 4F4E 2964 BF46



Re: Timeout issues.

2001-05-22 Thread Karsten W. Rohrbach

most probably it is the dns setup.
if you do not need to know the names of clients that are connecting,
tcpserver -RHl0 is probably what you want. this won't work out with
tcprules files that carry = for evaluating the $TCPREMOTEHOST variable.
you might check the docs to tcpserver and tcprules:
http://cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp.html

cheers,
/k

Hank Wethington([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.05.21 11:02:10 +:
 I have about 6 qmail servers up and running in different parts of
 California. For the most part life has been pretty easy with them. I have 3
 machines giving me a headache currently and was hoping for some help. (I
 know 50% is a failing number)
 
 #1) A local machine running RH Linux and qmail 1.03. It had been running
 great for the last 9 months. I recently had an IP change on the machine as I
 switched DSL providers. I made sure all of the control files got changed and
 the new tcp rules added. However, it appears to not want to pop mail with
 out a long delay. My windows clients need to keep hitting wait. It
 eventually works, but it is very frustrating, considering it worked fine
 before the IP change. My guess is it relates to DNS. Am I on the right
 track, or has anyone else seen this? Is there a way I can fix it without
 long phone calls to my provider educating them on DNS and stuff :)
 
 #2) Is rather similar. Was built in house (RH Linux and qmail 1.03)and then
 sent out. Worked fine here, however in the clients location they get
 constant timeouts on SMTP and need to keep hitting wait as well. I am using
 the -R in the tcpserver startup so that it won't try to resolve the local
 IPs, but it is still happening.
 
 #3) Similar still. A large mail server I just built using Matt's BSD-qmail
 toaster setup. In house worked fantastic. Bring it in the field for a small
 ISP, and even trying to do a localhost port 25 connection is taking
 sometimes 10 minutes!?!
 
 All of these problems seem related and it is probably something really
 simple that is driving me crazy. If anyone has input on what I'm doing wrong
 I'd really appreciate it.
 
 Hank Wethington
 Information Logistics
 
 
 Information Logistics
 www.GoInfoLogistics.com
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

-- 
 I can emulate the Beta-version of every C  #include signal.h
 program I've ever written in two lines! - main() {raise(11);}
KR433/KR11-RIPE -- WebMonster Community Founder -- nGENn GmbH Senior Techie
http://www.webmonster.de/ -- ftp://ftp.webmonster.de/ -- http://www.ngenn.net/
karstenrohrbach.de -- alphangenn.net -- alphascene.org -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG 0x2964BF46 2001-03-15 42F9 9FFF 50D4 2F38 DBEE  DF22 3340 4F4E 2964 BF46



Re: R: R: leave a copy of messages on server

2001-05-22 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)

I think you may do it, but you must modify your pop3 server.

It should memorize the downloaded messages numbers and then execute the 
opportune dele # at the end of session (or immediately after RETR 
command, when a new command is given and it may be sure that previous RETR 
has completed).


Or...
If I'm not wrong, all read messages are moved to ../Maildir/cur, so you 
could delete all messages in those ../Maildir/cur directories.

Tonino

At 22/05/2001 22/05/2001 +0200, Andrea Cerrito wrote:
Mmmmhhh, I don't think it's possible.
Anyway, you can set a crontab to delete old messages (ie: 30 days old) or 
you can set quota.

It's not advisable to make the delete mandatory because:

1) user may want to look his/her messages from a location, and to download 
them from another one,
2) the data transfer may fail for some reason (and you force deletion of a 
message unread by user)

Good work

---
Cordiali saluti / Best regards
Andrea Cerrito
^^
Net.Admin @ Centro MultiMediale di Terni S.p.A.
P.zzale Bosco 3A
05100 Terni IT
Tel. +39 744 5441330
Fax. +39 744 5441372
-Messaggio originale-
Da: medi [mailto:medi]Per conto di Medi Montaseri
Inviato: lunedì 21 maggio 2001 21.11
A: Andrea Cerrito
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oggetto: Re: R: leave a copy of messages on server

I have the opposit question, is it possible to mandate delete?
That is, can I mandate the all messages  be downloaded from a POP server?

Andrea Cerrito wrote:
Mmmm... strange.

A normal pop3 session is like

...
stat
retr #num
dele #num

and if you set leave a copy... the dele action is never done.
Try to telnet to your box and act as a mail client: you'll be able to know
if it's a problem with qmail (I don't think so, anyway) or with your client.

I mean

+OK [EMAIL PROTECTED]
user $YOURUSER
+OK
pass $YOURPASS
+OK
stat
+OK 1 1228
retr 1
bla bla bla bla bla
quit
+OK

then reconnect and see if the message is still alive.
Good luck
---
Cordiali saluti / Best regards
Andrea Cerrito
^^
Net.Admin @ Centro MultiMediale di Terni S.p.A.
P.zzale Bosco 3A
05100 Terni IT
Tel. +39 744 5441330
Fax. +39 744 5441372

  -Messaggio originale-
  Da: Roberto Marzialetti 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Inviato: lunedì 21 maggio 2001 18.39
  A: Qmail List
  Oggetto: leave a copy of messages on server
 
 
  Hi boys
 
  have got a problem...
  well... if i active the option leave a copy
  of messages on server  on my email client, the messages
  doesn't leave on my server :o((
 
  have you got some solution ?
 
  many thanks
 
  Roberto
 
 

--

===

Medi Montaseri, [EMAIL PROTECTED], 408-450-7114

Prepass Inc, IT/Operations, Software Eng.

===





how control smtp relay

2001-05-22 Thread Gustav-Martin Olsen

Hello,

i've many User the works with dhcp, so i can't set the ip or ip range in
/etc/tcp.smtp file. How can i control this user, i want that only this users
work with the smtp server. In the moment can anybody send (relaying).

Can i filter, that the recipient or the sender must have definite domain
address? (for example to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or from: [EMAIL PROTECTED])

Thanks for the help

best regards

Gustav

-- 
Machen Sie Ihr Hobby zu Geld bei unserem Partner 11!
http://profiseller.de/info/index.php3?ac=OM.PS.PS003K00596T0409a

--
GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet.
http://www.gmx.net




Re: leave a copy of messages on server

2001-05-22 Thread Roberto Marzialetti

Hi guys, isaac...

-- isaac --
 When a message is read but not cleared, qmail moves the message from the
 Maildir/new directory to Maildir/cur directory and appends :2, to the
end
 of the message.

yeah... i had seen :o)

 From what information I could find regarding this problem, it all boils
down
 to the client email application and its POP functionality, not qmail.

i solved my problem starting qmail-pop3d by tcpserver.

-- peter ---
It does exactly what you tell it to. What is the problem?
Please state what you expected the computer to do, and
what it did instead.

oky, excuse me :oP

may many many thanks

Roberto




Re: qmail-pop3d and /var/spool/mail or NO /HOME/$USER

2001-05-22 Thread Charles Cazabon

Charles Olds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 My goal is:
 Install qmail to work with virtual users. (i.e. No account in
 /etc/passwd.  No /home/user.  Mail delivered to /var/spool/mail.)

You're limiting your options here by insisting on mbox format and
/var/spool/mail.  Much of the better software intended to be used with qmail
uses Maildir format, and storage outside of /var/spool/mail .

 I have downloaded and installed qmail, tcpserver, qmailadmin, etc..
 Everything looks good and runs except qmail-pop3d does not work with
 virtual users.  When trying to retrieve mail I get the message No
 /HOME/$USER directory...
 
 Please recommend a POP3 server that will work with qmail and allow mail
 to be retrieved from /var/spool/mail.

I'd personally recommend vmailmgr for virtual domain setups.  However, it does
necessitate Maildir storage (well, mostly) and at least one system account per
virtual domain.

Charles
-- 
---
Charles Cazabon[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPL'ed software available at:  http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
---



Re: Qmail with amavis

2001-05-22 Thread Eduardo Augusto Alvarenga

 Hi All, I'd like to know if someone in the list are
 using qmail with amavis-perl 11 in a Slackware 7.1 box?
 Thank's!
 
 Francisco André Barbosa Neto

I am.

Best Regards,

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Eduardo Augusto Alvarenga - Analista de Suporte - #179653
Blumenau - Santa Catarina. Tel. (47) 9102-3303
   http://www.netron.com.br/~eduardo
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-



10 Million Messages per day

2001-05-22 Thread Mark Lo

Hi,

If I have 10 Million messages per day.  What system requirement do I
need for a qmail server.  Etc. Memory.. CPU.. Bandwidth...

Thank you

Mark




Re: 10 Million Messages per day

2001-05-22 Thread Alex Povolotsky

On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 11:15:48PM +0800, Mark Lo wrote:
 If I have 10 Million messages per day.  What system requirement do I
 need for a qmail server.  Etc. Memory.. CPU.. Bandwidth...
10 000 000 of inbound, outbound or transit EMails? What is typical size? do
you need also POP3/IMAP? What is expected load on POP3/IMAP? 


Are you sure you're going to get 10 000 000, not 100 000?

Alex.



Re: 10 Million Messages per day

2001-05-22 Thread Charles Cazabon

Mark Lo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 If I have 10 Million messages per day.  What system requirement do I need
 for a qmail server.  Etc. Memory.. CPU.. Bandwidth...

You need to specify your requirements much more precisely for us to help you.
For instance:

1)  10M messages -- what size messages?

2)  Is this ten million copies of a single identical message (i.e., the same
message text to each of ten million recipients)?  Or is this ten million
personalized messages, each to a single recipient?

3)  What sort of latency is acceptable to you?  Do you require that all
recipients (well, those whose mailservers don't defer the delivery) recieve it
within 2 hours?  Or 20 minutes?  Or is 24 hours acceptable?

4)  Are the recipients local?  Virtual?  Remote-to-close-networks?
Remote-to-the-net-at-large?  The 10M number implies an answer to this
question, but we don't want to assume incorrectly.

The list archive is full of discussions on large/huge mailing lists and
hardware required to host them.  Try searching the archive.  You can find
pointers to it at qmail.org.

Charles
-- 
---
Charles Cazabon[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPL'ed software available at:  http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
---



Re: 10 Million Messages per day

2001-05-22 Thread Mark Lo

Yeh.. 10 Million outbound messages...


- Original Message -
From: Alex Povolotsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mark Lo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 11:34 PM
Subject: Re: 10 Million Messages per day


 On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 11:15:48PM +0800, Mark Lo wrote:
  If I have 10 Million messages per day.  What system requirement do I
  need for a qmail server.  Etc. Memory.. CPU.. Bandwidth...
 10 000 000 of inbound, outbound or transit EMails? What is typical size?
do
 you need also POP3/IMAP? What is expected load on POP3/IMAP?


 Are you sure you're going to get 10 000 000, not 100 000?

 Alex.






/var/qmail/alias/.qmail-default vs virtualdomains

2001-05-22 Thread Dean Staff

Hi,

I'd like to know if it's possible to edit the /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-
default file, so instead of it having a username or email address to 
deliver messages for undefined users to, you have a defined path to a 
specific mailbox. ie:  /home/bubba/Maildir/

The reason I ask is because we provide and internet fax service, and 
we recieve messages addressed to a-fax-number@domain.com
Obviously I can setup a user account for every possible fax number, 
so we deliver anything undefined to 1 mailbox. THe problem is that in 
the default setup qmail changes the Delivered To: address to the user 
listed in the /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-default file. And if I use the 
virtualdomain feature it prepends the username defined for that 
domain to the Delivered To: field. 

Niether option is particularly useful, as we need to see the fax 
number unmodified.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Dean


Dean Staff
Protus IP Solutions
210 - 2379 Holly Lane
Ottawa, ON K1V 7P2 Canada
613-733- ex 546 Fax 613-248-4553
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.protus.com




Re: 10 Million Messages per day

2001-05-22 Thread Philipp Steinkrüger

Mark Lo writes:

 Hi, 
 
 If I have 10 Million messages per day.  What system requirement do I
 need for a qmail server.  Etc. Memory.. CPU.. Bandwidth... 
 

Have a look at the inter7 homepage (www.inter7.com). They offer 
preconfiguerd qmail server for low, medium and high usage. That will
give you an idea, i  guess. 


Regards,
Philipp 

 
Philipp Steinkrüger 

Technik
Oberberg Online
Tel.: +49 2261 814240
Fax: +49 2261 814919
www.oberberg.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 



manymanymany splogger processes

2001-05-22 Thread Ahead of the Street

Anyone have a guess why qmail is running thousands of copies of splogger?

I just sent out a sizable mailing, so I expect the server to be busy and
working hard, but seriously... thousands of copies of splogger?  Is it
/supposed/ to run a new instance for each outgoing message?


--joshua.




Re: manymanymany splogger processes

2001-05-22 Thread Peter van Dijk

On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 12:12:04PM -0400, Ahead of the Street wrote:
 Anyone have a guess why qmail is running thousands of copies of splogger?

We don't guess. We give answers, if you ask questions.

 I just sent out a sizable mailing, so I expect the server to be busy and
 working hard, but seriously... thousands of copies of splogger?  Is it
 /supposed/ to run a new instance for each outgoing message?

No, not at all. You are obviously doing something wrong. Please
provide more detail:
- how are you starting qmail
- how are you sending out the mailing
- are the splogger processes visibly doing something towards syslog

and any other details that are relevant.

Greetz, Peter.



Re: /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-default vs virtualdomains

2001-05-22 Thread Charles Cazabon

Dean Staff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 I'd like to know if it's possible to edit the /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-
 default file, so instead of it having a username or email address to 
 deliver messages for undefined users to, you have a defined path to a 
 specific mailbox. ie:  /home/bubba/Maildir/
 
 The reason I ask is because we provide and internet fax service, and 
 we recieve messages addressed to a-fax-number@domain.com
 Obviously I can setup a user account for every possible fax number, 
 so we deliver anything undefined to 1 mailbox. THe problem is that in 
 the default setup qmail changes the Delivered To: address to the user 
 listed in the /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-default file. And if I use the 
 virtualdomain feature it prepends the username defined for that 
 domain to the Delivered To: field. 
 
 Niether option is particularly useful, as we need to see the fax 
 number unmodified.

Perhaps you could try this:

-make the domain virtual.  For instance, dom.net:virtuser1 in
virtualdomains.
-have .qmail files in ~virtuser1 to handle the real users, if any:
~virtuser1/.qmail-joe contains /home/virtuser1/Mail/joe/ or similar.
This could be a vmailmgr domain perhaps?
-have ~virtuser1/.qmail-default to handle all the fax numbers.
You can then refer to $DEFAULT in a script to get the original mail
address (fax number).  `man qmail-command` and `man dot-qmail` for
details.

Charles
-- 
---
Charles Cazabon[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPL'ed software available at:  http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
---



RE: qmail + vpopmail + maildrop + sqwebmail 2.0.0

2001-05-22 Thread Hank Wethington

You can try Matt's FreeBSD-Qmail toaster. Although he doesn't use maildrop
in there. I added it with the qmailqueue to check for VBS scripts before
delivering e-mail without much of a problem. Check it out
http://matt.simerson.net/computing/qmail.toaster.shtml

Hank Wethington
Information Logistics


Information Logistics
www.GoInfoLogistics.com
mailto:info.at.GoInfoLogistics.com

-Original Message-
From: Roy Svendsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 1:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: qmail + vpopmail + maildrop + sqwebmail 2.0.0


Hi!

Anyone that have put opp something like this?

How do I set up Maildrop too work under vpopmail so I can build filter with
sqwebmail 2.0.0

Have'nt found any good information on this one!


Best regard

--
Roy Svendsen

Life is like an potato!




Re: pulling mail from other than new/cur (sorry again...better reply address)

2001-05-22 Thread Paul Gregg

Dave Sill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure you can - rather stupid buying the cake in the first place if you
can't eat it ;-)
 
 No you can't. If you eat it, you no longer have it. Of course, you
 could eat half of it and still have half of it. :-)

Yes you do still have it.  Might not be quite as accessable after eating it
and I'm not sure you'd want to get it back.  But you still have it for 
the next 24-48 hours and possibly longer if you like Mr. Hankey.
:-)

Paul.
-- 
| Paul Gregg|T: +44 (0) 28 90424190
| Technical Director|F: +44 (0) 28 90424709
| The Internet Business Ltd |W: http://www.tibus.com
| Holywood House, Innis Court   |E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Holywood, Co Down, BT18 9HF   |P: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: manymanymany splogger processes

2001-05-22 Thread Joshua Nichols

Sorry about the long posting, but at least everythings in one place.

It seems to me that qmail-pop3d is not running correctly, thus explaining
the errors in /var/log/maillog, but is that also causing my splogger process
problem?


  I just sent out a sizable mailing, so I expect the server to be busy and
  working hard, but seriously... thousands of copies of splogger?  Is it
  /supposed/ to run a new instance for each outgoing message?

 No, not at all. You are obviously doing something wrong. Please
 provide more detail:
 - how are you starting qmail

With supervise.  I've added several key files below for a more complete
reference.

 - how are you sending out the mailing
It's a perl script that uses sendmail, but it is the qmail replacement for
sendmail.

 - are the splogger processes visibly doing something towards syslog

Well, /var/log/maillog has tons of these error messages:

May 22 11:31:57 nsc pop3d: 990545517.798654 tcpserver: fatal: unable to
bind: address already used



FILES:

/var/qmail/supervise/qmail-send/run
---
#!/bin/sh
exec /var/qmail/rc
---


/var/qmail/supervise/qmail-send/log/run
---
#!/bin/sh
exec /usr/local/bin/setuidgid qmaill /usr/local/bin/multilog t s250
/var/log/qmail/qmail-send
---


/var/qmail/supervise/qmail-pop3d/run
---
#!/bin/sh
tcpserver -v -R 0 pop3 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup mail.nextstepcapital.net
/bin/ \
checkpassword /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir 21 |
/var/qmail/bin/splogger \
pop3d
---


/var/qmail/supervise/qmail-pop3d/log/run
---
#!/bin/sh
exec /usr/local/bin/setuidgid qmaill /usr/local/bin/multilog t s250
/var/log/qmail/qmail-pop3d
---


/etc/rc.d/init.d/qmail
---
#!/bin/sh -e
# /etc/init.d/qmail : start or stop the qmail mail subsystem.
# borrowed from http://Web.InfoAve.Net/~dsill/lwq.html#start-qmail
# modified by Adam McKenna [EMAIL PROTECTED]

PATH=$PATH:/usr/local/bin:/var/qmail/bin

case $1 in
start)
echo -n Starting mail-transport-agent:
svc -u /var/qmail/supervise/*
echo -n  qmail
svc -u /var/qmail/supervise/*/log
echo  logging.
;;
stop)
echo -n Stopping mail-transport-agent: 
echo -n  qmail
svc -d /var/qmail/supervise/*
echo  logging
svc -d /var/qmail/supervise/*/log
;;
restart)
$0 stop
$0 start
;;
reload|force-reload)
echo Reloading 'locals' and 'virtualdomains' control files.
svc -h /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-send
;;
*)
echo 'Usage: /etc/init.d/qmail {start|stop|restart|reload}'
exit 1
esac

exit 0
---


/etc/rc.local (partial)
---
/etc/init.d/svscan start
tcpserver 0 110 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup mail.nextstepcapital.net \
/bin/checkpassword /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir 
---





qmail-pop3d advice ( migrate to vpopmail ? )

2001-05-22 Thread Renato


Hi all,

I have a server which has about 50.000 e-mail accounts. POP3 concurrency is 
set to 150 and timeout to 90 seconds. A couple of days ago, my users 
started to feel a huge delay in getting their messages via POP and 
sometimes, they even cannot connect. I checked the number of simultaneous 
number of connections and is not close to 150. Of course, concurrency 
increased a little bit ( around 100 ) in the past few days, but it didn't 
reach the limit yet. 

I think my machine is on its knees right now :((, but I cannot afford to 
have a better hardware at this moment. What can I do to improve 
performance ? ( I mean software performance... ). The migrating to vpopmail 
would help ? What about mysql to authenticate users ? 

Thanks
Renato - Brazil

P.S. I'm using qmail+vmailmgr, so I have thousands of passwd.cdb files...




Re: manymanymany splogger processes

2001-05-22 Thread Peter van Dijk

On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 01:43:46PM -0400, Joshua Nichols wrote:
[snip]
 FILES:
 
 /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-send/run
 ---
 #!/bin/sh
 exec /var/qmail/rc
 ---

Looks good, as long as there is no  in /var/qmail/rc

 /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-send/log/run
 ---
 #!/bin/sh
 exec /usr/local/bin/setuidgid qmaill /usr/local/bin/multilog t s250
 /var/log/qmail/qmail-send
 ---

Looks good.

 /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-pop3d/run
 ---
 #!/bin/sh
 tcpserver -v -R 0 pop3 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup mail.nextstepcapital.net
 /bin/ \
 checkpassword /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir 21 |
 /var/qmail/bin/splogger \
 pop3d
 ---

You should remove everything behind the | (and the | itself) here.
Logging is handled by multilog as you show below, and the  at the end
makes it all respawn way often.
 
 /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-pop3d/log/run
 ---
 #!/bin/sh
 exec /usr/local/bin/setuidgid qmaill /usr/local/bin/multilog t s250
 /var/log/qmail/qmail-pop3d
 ---

Looks good.

[snip]
 
 /etc/rc.local (partial)
 ---
 /etc/init.d/svscan start
 tcpserver 0 110 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup mail.nextstepcapital.net \
 /bin/checkpassword /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir 
 ---

You can remove the tcpserver line, this is handled by the qmail-pop3d
supervise.

Greetz, Peter.



RE: manymanymany splogger processes

2001-05-22 Thread Willy De la Court

Sorry about this but this is a junkyard.
read on

On Tuesday, May 22, 2001 19:44, Joshua Nichols [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
 
 Sorry about the long posting, but at least everythings in one place.
 
 It seems to me that qmail-pop3d is not running correctly, thus explaining
 the errors in /var/log/maillog, but is that also causing my splogger process
 problem?
 
 
   I just sent out a sizable mailing, so I expect the server to be busy and
   working hard, but seriously... thousands of copies of splogger?  Is it
   /supposed/ to run a new instance for each outgoing message?
 
  No, not at all. You are obviously doing something wrong. Please
  provide more detail:
  - how are you starting qmail
 
 With supervise.  I've added several key files below for a more complete
 reference.
 
  - how are you sending out the mailing
 It's a perl script that uses sendmail, but it is the qmail replacement for
 sendmail.
 
  - are the splogger processes visibly doing something towards syslog
 
 Well, /var/log/maillog has tons of these error messages:
 
 May 22 11:31:57 nsc pop3d: 990545517.798654 tcpserver: fatal: unable to
 bind: address already used
 
 
 
 FILES:
 
 /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-send/run
 ---
 #!/bin/sh
 exec /var/qmail/rc
 ---
where is the contents of /var/qmail/rc ??
 
 
 /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-send/log/run
 ---
 #!/bin/sh
 exec /usr/local/bin/setuidgid qmaill /usr/local/bin/multilog t s250
 /var/log/qmail/qmail-send
 ---
 
 
 /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-pop3d/run
 ---
 #!/bin/sh
 tcpserver -v -R 0 pop3 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup mail.nextstepcapital.net
 /bin/ \
 checkpassword /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir 21 |
 /var/qmail/bin/splogger \
 pop3d
 ---
remove the 
| /var/qmail/bin/splogger pop3d 
from the above script the logging is done in /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-pop3d/log/run
this is why you get a lot of splogger processes
 
 
 /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-pop3d/log/run
 ---
 #!/bin/sh
 exec /usr/local/bin/setuidgid qmaill /usr/local/bin/multilog t s250
 /var/log/qmail/qmail-pop3d
 ---
 
 
 /etc/rc.d/init.d/qmail
 ---
 #!/bin/sh -e
 # /etc/init.d/qmail : start or stop the qmail mail subsystem.
 # borrowed from http://Web.InfoAve.Net/~dsill/lwq.html#start-qmail
 # modified by Adam McKenna [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 PATH=$PATH:/usr/local/bin:/var/qmail/bin
 
 case $1 in
 start)
 echo -n Starting mail-transport-agent:
 svc -u /var/qmail/supervise/*
 echo -n  qmail
 svc -u /var/qmail/supervise/*/log
 echo  logging.
 ;;
 stop)
 echo -n Stopping mail-transport-agent: 
 echo -n  qmail
 svc -d /var/qmail/supervise/*
 echo  logging
 svc -d /var/qmail/supervise/*/log
 ;;
 restart)
 $0 stop
 $0 start
 ;;
 reload|force-reload)
 echo Reloading 'locals' and 'virtualdomains' control files.
 svc -h /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-send
 ;;
 *)
 echo 'Usage: /etc/init.d/qmail {start|stop|restart|reload}'
 exit 1
 esac
 
 exit 0
 ---
 
 
 /etc/rc.local (partial)
 ---
 /etc/init.d/svscan start
 tcpserver 0 110 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup mail.nextstepcapital.net \
 /bin/checkpassword /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir 
 ---
remove 
tcpserver 0 110 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup mail.nextstepcapital.net \
/bin/checkpassword /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir 

because qmail-popup is already running under supervise
this is why you get the error message  fatal: unable to bind: address already used

 



Re: qmail-pop3d advice ( migrate to vpopmail ? )

2001-05-22 Thread Charles Cazabon

Renato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Hi all,

Don't post a new question by replying to an existing thread.  This messes up
the threading in our MUAs and in the list archives.

As for your problem:  it's the absolute #1 most frequently asked question.
It's in the FAQs, it's in the list archives hundreds of times, and its even in
one mailing list member's .sig.

Charles
-- 
---
Charles Cazabon[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPL'ed software available at:  http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
---



Re: 10 Million Messages per day

2001-05-22 Thread Medi Montaseri


In my opinion, design your system as wide as possible and not as tall as
possible.
ie use a bunch of computers instead of one single tall one.
Alex Povolotsky wrote:
On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 11:15:48PM +0800, Mark Lo
wrote:
> If I have 10 Million messages per day.
What system requirement do I
> need for a qmail server. Etc. Memory.. CPU.. Bandwidth...
10 000 000 of inbound, outbound or transit EMails? What is typical
size? do
you need also POP3/IMAP? What is expected load on POP3/IMAP?
Are you sure you're going to get 10 000 000, not 100 000?
Alex.

--
===
Medi Montaseri, [EMAIL PROTECTED], 408-450-7114
Prepass Inc, IT/Operations, Software Eng.
===



RE: how control smtp relay

2001-05-22 Thread daiyuwen



 i've many User the works with dhcp, so i can't set the ip or ip range in
 /etc/tcp.smtp file. How can i control this user, i want that only this users
 work with the smtp server. In the moment can anybody send (relaying).
 
 Can i filter, that the recipient or the sender must have definite domain
 address? (for example to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

'To' and 'From' fields can be forged.  Try using relay-control.  On the www.qmail.org, 
search keyword 'relay-control'.

best regards,
Dai yuwen
__

===
ÐÂÀËÃâ·Ñµç×ÓÓÊÏä (http://mail.sina.com.cn)
Ñ°ÕÒÐÂÏÊ, Ó®¿ÆÁú±ùÏä! 
(http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;2847753;5579344;y?http://gd.sina.com.cn/ad/kelon)
ʹÓÃÊÖ»ú¶ÌÐÅ¡°ÓʼþÌáÐÑ¡±¹¦ÄÜ£¬ËæʱÁ˽âµÄÊÕÐÂÐÅÇé¿ö£¡ 
(http://sms.sina.com.cn/docs/sina_mailalert.html)



gcc programming with qmail

2001-05-22 Thread KY Lui
Title: gcc programming with qmail





Hello


i want to develop an application which can send mail through the qmail system.
could you please give me a starting point of this?
i don't know how to do it


thanks


KY





Problems with SMTP connections

2001-05-22 Thread Graham H.

Hey,

I'm pretty new to qmail, so I apologize in advance if my
question is a but mundane.  I have read all the INSTALL docs
and the FAQ, so I hope I haven't overlooked anything. 
Here's the deal:

Everything gets delivered locally just fine.  Even remotely
to certain domains.  However, when sending messages to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED], my logs tell me
that qmail could not establish an SMTP connection with those
servers.  I telnet to 25 on a given server, and sure enough,
I can't get a connection.  However, I know these domains are
receiving.  Should I be running a local DNS server?  If so,
I don't see why.  Perhaps I'm just a gimp and I overlooked a
config file.

Any help is appreciated.  Flames are welcome to my email
address so as not to clog up the mailing list.

Thanks again,

-- Graham



Re: Problems with SMTP connections

2001-05-22 Thread Eduardo Augusto Alvarenga

 Hey,
 
 I'm pretty new to qmail, so I apologize in advance if my
 question is a but mundane.  I have read all the INSTALL docs
 and the FAQ, so I hope I haven't overlooked anything.
 Here's the deal:
 
 Everything gets delivered locally just fine.  Even remotely
 to certain domains.  However, when sending messages to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED], my logs tell me
 that qmail could not establish an SMTP connection with those
 servers.  I telnet to 25 on a given server, and sure enough,
 I can't get a connection.  However, I know these domains are
 receiving.  Should I be running a local DNS server?  If so,
 I don't see why.  Perhaps I'm just a gimp and I overlooked a
 config file.

You can't get a connection ONLY from your server ? Or from you hole link
?
If only particular from your server, try tracing the route to these
hosts, 
from a working machine and from the server.
Since you can receive/send to a couple of other domains with 100%
success,
it looks like you are on a network/routing trouble.

 
 Any help is appreciated.  Flames are welcome to my email
 address so as not to clog up the mailing list.
 
 Thanks again,
 
 -- Graham


Best Regards,

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Eduardo Augusto Alvarenga - Analista de Suporte - #179653
Blumenau - Santa Catarina. Tel. (47) 9102-3303
   http://www.netron.com.br/~eduardo
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

 /\
 \ /  Campanha da Fita ASCII - Contra Mail HTML
  X   ASCII Ribbon Campaign - Against HTML Mail
 / \



webmail recommendations?

2001-05-22 Thread Eric Paynter

I've just started an email server evaluation to provide a complete email
solution including POP3, SMTP, and webmail. We're already strongly thinking
qmail is a good place to start, but it does not have native webmail support.
We do not need IMAP. So far, the webmail servers on the floor are:

oMail-webmail
NeoMail
AtDot
EmuMail

Does anybody have any good/bad experience with these? Do they integrate well
with qmail? We're hoping to use maildir format. I know oMail supports it,
but from a perusal of the websites, I'm not certain if the others do. Also,
can anybody suggest any other webmail servers that integrate well with
qmail?

Any comments appreciated.

Thanks,

-Eric P.

---
arctic bears - the internet - your way.
email hosting from US$8/month, domains from US$19/year.
http://www.arcticbears.com







Re: webmail recommendations?

2001-05-22 Thread Chris Hellberg

Eric Paynter wrote:

 I've just started an email server evaluation to provide a complete email
 solution including POP3, SMTP, and webmail. We're already strongly thinking
 qmail is a good place to start, but it does not have native webmail support.
 We do not need IMAP. So far, the webmail servers on the floor are:

 oMail-webmail
 NeoMail
 AtDot
 EmuMail

 Does anybody have any good/bad experience with these? Do they integrate well
 with qmail? We're hoping to use maildir format. I know oMail supports it,
 but from a perusal of the websites, I'm not certain if the others do. Also,
 can anybody suggest any other webmail servers that integrate well with
 qmail?

 Any comments appreciated.

 Thanks,

 -Eric P.

 ---
 arctic bears - the internet - your way.
 email hosting from US$8/month, domains from US$19/year.
 http://www.arcticbears.com

I've found courier sqwebmail to be a good solution. Works nicely with maildir's
and is free (not sure about commercial licensing though). Has all sorts of
different method you can use for authentication.

Chris





Re: webmail recommendations?

2001-05-22 Thread John Chapman

Eric,

Check out Vpopmail at www.inter7.com.

Works quite well.

John Chapman

From:   Eric Paynter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:webmail recommendations?
Date sent:  Tue, 22 May 2001 20:14:40 -0700

 I've just started an email server evaluation to provide a complete
 email solution including POP3, SMTP, and webmail. We're already
 strongly thinking qmail is a good place to start, but it does not have
 native webmail support. We do not need IMAP. So far, the webmail
 servers on the floor are:
 
 oMail-webmail
 NeoMail
 AtDot
 EmuMail
 
 Does anybody have any good/bad experience with these? Do they
 integrate well with qmail? We're hoping to use maildir format. I know
 oMail supports it, but from a perusal of the websites, I'm not certain
 if the others do. Also, can anybody suggest any other webmail servers
 that integrate well with qmail?
 
 Any comments appreciated.
 
 Thanks,
 
 -Eric P.
 
 ---
 arctic bears - the internet - your way.
 email hosting from US$8/month, domains from US$19/year.
 http://www.arcticbears.com
 
 
 
 





Re: webmail recommendations?

2001-05-22 Thread Remo Mattei

Eric Paynter wrote:

 I've just started an email server evaluation to provide a complete email
 solution including POP3, SMTP, and webmail. We're already strongly thinking
 qmail is a good place to start, but it does not have native webmail support.
 We do not need IMAP. So far, the webmail servers on the floor are:

 oMail-webmail
 NeoMail
 AtDot
 EmuMail

 Does anybody have any good/bad experience with these? Do they integrate well
 with qmail? We're hoping to use maildir format. I know oMail supports it,
 but from a perusal of the websites, I'm not certain if the others do. Also,
 can anybody suggest any other webmail servers that integrate well with
 qmail?

 Any comments appreciated.

 Thanks,

 -Eric P.

 ---
 arctic bears - the internet - your way.
 email hosting from US$8/month, domains from US$19/year.
 http://www.arcticbears.com

Wrong!! Yes it does have webmail support, it's called sqwebmail good program
and very fast, you can also use IMP. I will work with maildir no problem.

Remo





Re: webmail recommendations?

2001-05-22 Thread Olivier M.

On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 08:14:40PM -0700, Eric Paynter wrote:
 We do not need IMAP. So far, the webmail servers on the floor are:

 oMail-webmail
ok  (hopefully :)  will work with vpopmail.

 NeoMail
not for maildirs...

 AtDot
 EmuMail
pop3-based mailers afaik

+ sqwebmail
+ imp
+ dwebmail

(look on freshmeat)

Regards,
Olivier
-- 
_
 Olivier Mueller - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - PGPkeyID: 0E84D2EA - Switzerland
qmail projects: http://omail.omnis.ch  -  http://webmail.omnis.ch