Mirrors
Hi all, Mirrors of http://cr.yp.to/ http://qmail.org/ http://ezmlm.org/ are available on my tiny server http://sakapuss.homeip.net/ (publicfile). It is located in Toulouse (France). Cheers, Dj.
Re: smtp on a specific IP
On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 05:41:51PM -0700, Ross Davis wrote: > There has to be some kind of config file that tells qmail-smtpd what domains > to send for. qmail-smtpd does not send mail. It receives mails via smtp. qmail-send takes care of sending and starts qmail-remote for off-site deliveries. qmail-remote does not bind to a specific IP at all. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: dot qmail problem
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 11:31:32PM +0800, Lye On Siong Johnny wrote: > .qmail-default remove this one too. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
qmail Digest 3 Jun 2001 10:00:01 -0000 Issue 1384
qmail Digest 3 Jun 2001 10:00:01 - Issue 1384 Topics (messages 63369 through 63404): Re: two question about qmail 63369 by: Andrea Cerrito Re: Enquiry 63370 by: Russell Nelson 63385 by: El Chupacabra Re: Oops,I guess Sendmail wasn't secure after all... 63371 by: Boris 63372 by: Karsten W. Rohrbach 63373 by: Boris 63374 by: Daniel Kelley 63375 by: Boris 63376 by: Johan Almqvist 63377 by: Boris 63378 by: Adrian Ho 63380 by: Patrick Atamaniuk 63382 by: Mark Delany 63386 by: Todd Finney 63395 by: Russell Nelson Re: IsoQlog problems 63379 by: Flavio Curti expn 63381 by: Rob Genovesi 63383 by: Mark Delany Re: masquarading and qmail-smtpd 63384 by: Alex Pennace 451 error 63387 by: Nathaniel L. Keeling III 63392 by: Charles Cazabon xinetd 63388 by: Eduardo Gargiulo 63389 by: Nick (Keith) Fish 63393 by: Charles Cazabon 63394 by: Kirti S. Bajwa 63396 by: David Means Re: headers in failure notice 63390 by: Charles Cazabon 63397 by: Russell Nelson Re: host masquerading / qmail-remote problems 63391 by: Charles Cazabon Re: smtp on a specific IP 63398 by: Ross Davis 63403 by: Henning Brauer whether original sender can receiver a notic mail when mail can't send ? 63399 by: George Xu How filter a special mail address or subject when receiver all mail. 63400 by: George Xu qmail-remote crashing w/TLS patch 63401 by: Charles Sprickman Mirrors 63402 by: Djalil Chafai Re: dot qmail problem 63404 by: Henning Brauer Administrivia: To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe to the digest, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To bug my human owner, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To post to the list, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Hi. > 1, How to setup qmail with ESMTP, each time a client wanna use > smtp server, > smtp server ask him pop3 user&pass to check if right. and only allow mail > from is that user's mail can be sent. You can patch qmail with authentication for qmail-smtp, or instead you can allow relay just after a pop3 authentication (using vpopmail function or an external package, called realy-ctrl). You can found them on qmail home page. > 2, Can I count how many mails one day the qmail processed? > (received & send) > Did this need another tools and where can I find them? You can use the mrtg + qmail-mrtg. You can find more infos here https://mail.socha.net/stats/ (and on qmail homepage, of course). --- Cordiali saluti / Best regards Andrea Cerrito ^^ Net.Admin @ Centro MultiMediale di Terni S.p.A. P.zzale Bosco 3A 05100 Terni IT Tel. +39 744 5441330 Fax. +39 744 5441372 Rohit Gupta writes: > Hi all guruz > > Is there any way out without using vpopmail.. that i can analysing > qmail queue and cleaning it manually without actually get into > queue directory and deleting the files manually You worry too much. Qmail doesn't need any queue management. What problem are you trying to solve? -- -russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://russnelson.com Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | Microsoft rivets everything. 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | Linux has some loose screws. Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | You own a screwdriver. Il Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Rohit Gupta senza cognizione di causa, scrisse: > Hi all guruz > > Is there any way out without using vpopmail.. that i can analysing qmail queue and >cleaning it manually without actually get into queue directory and deleting the files >manually > rgds > Rohit > You can try to use 'qmHandle' Bye. -- -- El Chupacabra Linux User No.: 187826 e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Remember, there is always a Chupacabra around the corner. -- Hello Russell, Saturday, June 02, 2001, 5:38:43 AM, you wrote: RN> Boris writes: RN> > I really can´t hear the "qmail is the most secure bla bla" anymore, RN> > really. RN> Why? It's true. Yes it is true, and qmail is great, but it would be better to make a better documentation for qmail, and to offer "bundles" with a single makefile. My english is not very good, sorry. I mean qmail has better arguments as security only. Why no one makes a package with "all you need" to download and install, here is a suggestion: - qmail - the tcpserver - something good for pop before smtp - vpopmail - good tools for blocking spam, blocking mails from open relays, and so on - and other additions from other people i do not know There should be one file to download and the makefile should do nearly everything neccessary. I should not spend days to understand the different modules as a newbie, it takes too much time. RN> > At
Re: ORBS, and RFC-ignorant blacklists
Hello >Alan Brown, operator of ORBS, was served 2 New Zealand High Court >injunctions ordering the removal of several OBRS listings. The compalies >who filed for these injunctions are Actrix and NZ Telecom. I have written to this list one year ago, Allan Brown activity is illegal, moreover hi helps hackers more than normal peoples. Also good decision of NZ Court. Piotr --- Piotr Kasztelowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [http://www.am.torun.pl/~pekasz]
Re: ORBS, and RFC-ignorant blacklists
On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 11:25:10AM +, Piotr Kasztelowicz wrote: > Hello > > >Alan Brown, operator of ORBS, was served 2 New Zealand High Court > >injunctions ordering the removal of several OBRS listings. The compalies > >who filed for these injunctions are Actrix and NZ Telecom. > > I have written to this list one year ago, Allan Brown activity > is illegal, moreover hi helps hackers more than normal peoples. > Also good decision of NZ Court. I hate starting a flamethread (and hope you all are smart enough not to), but ORBS does not help hackers. Furthermore, Alan Brown's activities are not illegal - the ORBS relaytester runs in The Netherlands, where this is not illegal by any law. Greetz, Peter.
Re: smtp on a specific IP
Thank you for correcting me on what is doing the sending. I still can't believe that after all this time, I am the only one that wants to control what ip a domain sends mail out on. Is it physically possible to control the IP that qmail-remote uses to send from? - Original Message - From: "Henning Brauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2001 2:28 AM Subject: Re: smtp on a specific IP > On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 05:41:51PM -0700, Ross Davis wrote: > > There has to be some kind of config file that tells qmail-smtpd what domains > > to send for. > > qmail-smtpd does not send mail. It receives mails via smtp. > qmail-send takes care of sending and starts qmail-remote for off-site > deliveries. qmail-remote does not bind to a specific IP at all. > > -- > * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * > * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * > Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. > (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: smtp on a specific IP
Ross Davis writes: > I still can't believe that after all this time, I am the only one that wants > to control what ip a domain sends mail out on. Quoting from www.qmail.org: http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Markus Stumpf has a http://www.lamer.de/maex/creative/software/qmail/";>pair of qmail patches, one to cause qmail-smtpd to log its disposition of mail, and another to convince qmail-remote to use a fixed IP address other than the one you get without binding to an address. Andy Repton has ported the fixed IP address patch to qmail 1.03. Damir Cifer has better instructions for his http://tycho.edico.si/linuxtnt/#qmail-patch";>port. -- -russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://russnelson.com Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | Microsoft rivets everything. 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | Linux has some loose screws. Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | You own a screwdriver.
Re: smtp on a specific IP
On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 09:55:46AM -0700, Ross Davis wrote: > I still can't believe that after all this time, I am the only one that wants > to control what ip a domain sends mail out on. Why should anyone care? For most of us the machine qmail runs on differs from the one the webserver runs on, so it's another IP anyways. Do accounting based on qmail's logfiles. > Is it physically possible to control the IP that qmail-remote uses to send > from? Well, you can patch qmail-remote of course. There's a patch floating around to let qmail-remote bind to ONE specific IP. If you still insist on your idea it may be possible to modify this one. But be warned: parsing the sender's address, getting the domaina nd looking up a IP for it adds a lot of cruft to the code. This _may_ result in security problems, bad performance, instability and so on. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
anyone using qmail-qfilter?
I'm getting these in my syslog: .../kernel: pid 93400 (qmail-qfilter), uid 82: exited on signal 11 I was getting LOTS of them, and I thought it was related to my filter attempting to reject messages with error code 31. Well my current filter consists of: #!/usr/bin/perl while (<>) { print; } exit (0); And I'm still seeing them. Bruce Guenter appears to have stopped development of qmail-qfilter (anything related to qmail?). Bummer, since this looks like the only option for filtering, and BG wrote some handy stuff. I'm using FreeBSD 4.2-Stable. Any suggestions are welcome. Thanks, jon
Re: Oops,I guess Sendmail wasn't secure after all...
Thus spake Boris ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > JA> Not quite. More like "someone inspects your free car and finds a button > JA> that can make it explode. Maybe he pushes the button, maybe not. Maybe he > JA> pushes the button on someone else's car". Are you willing to take that > JA> risk? I can imagine two situations where that would be the case: either > Well, there is no button with a text like "press me here" -) for > the public. Can we _please_ drop this? Boris has shown that his pitiful excuse for knowledge about his computer, his software, the Internet and just about everything else is not worth spending time on. If he does not go by himself, just killfile him and be done with it. This kind of bullshit is "discussed" with cluon sinks like Boris here hundreds of time every day on Usenet. No need to repeat that here. Thanks. Now: Boris, please crawl back under your stone, and the rest: let's talk about qmail again on the qmail list. Felix
Re: Enquiry
On Sat, 2 Jun 2001, Russell Nelson wrote: > Qmail doesn't need any queue management. Sure. Everything you need to do when your mail queue gets clogged with 10,000 spam messages is to close your eyes and wait a week or two until these messages and their undeliverable bounces time out and the queue is cleared out in a natural way. ;) --Pavel Kankovsky aka Peak [ Boycott Microsoft--http://www.vcnet.com/bms ] "Resistance is futile. Open your source code and prepare for assimilation."
Re: smtp on a specific IP
Thanks to all that helped. After seeing what would be involved, I think I will just report from the log files. Thanks again.
PROBLEM Setting up RELAYDOMAINS
We have qmail 1.03 with SPAMCONTROL patch (1.4.2) patch install. I have given the IP address list in RELAYCLIENTS & it is working fine. Now I want to restrict relaying based on domain name also. That means though the IP address of the person relaying through my SMTP server is listed in my RELAYCLIENTS list, I want his domain should be checked. (Don't allow if his mail from domain is not my own domain) In short we have problem in setting relaydomains Suppose my domain is MYDOMAIN.COM & I am allowing 203.61.22.21 IP from RELAYCLIENT. The sender having the same IP but he is sending MAIL from OTHERDOMAIN.COM to SOMEOTHERDOMAIN.COM then it should not be allowed. . If the IP addess listed in RELAYCLIENTS is allow the system is checking setting in RCPTHOSTS & if the domain is not listed in RCPTHOSTS then is gives '553 sorry, that domain isn't allowed to be relayed thru this MTA (#5.7.1)' error. It dose'nt checks RELAYDOMAINS setting at all. We tried verious options to set RELAYDOMAINS working but could't solve the problem. Please help me in solving this. Regards, Milind
PROBLEM Setting up RELAYDOMAINS
We have qmail 1.03 with SPAMCONTROL patch (1.4.2) patch install. I have given the IP address list in RELAYCLIENTS & it is working fine. Now I want to restrict relaying based on domain name also. That means though the IP address of the person relaying through my SMTP server is listed in my RELAYCLIENTS list, I want his domain should be checked. (Don't allow if his mail from domain is not my own domain) In short we have problem in setting relaydomains Suppose my domain is MYDOMAIN.COM & I am allowing 203.61.22.21 IP from RELAYCLIENT. The sender having the same IP but he is sending MAIL from OTHERDOMAIN.COM to SOMEOTHERDOMAIN.COM then it should not be allowed. . If the IP addess listed in RELAYCLIENTS is allow the system is checking setting in RCPTHOSTS & if the domain is not listed in RCPTHOSTS then is gives '553 sorry, that domain isn't allowed to be relayed thru this MTA (#5.7.1)' error. It dose'nt checks RELAYDOMAINS setting at all. We tried verious options to set RELAYDOMAINS working but could't solve the problem. Please help me in solving this. Regards, Milind
Qmailadmin
Hey guys/gals I'm currently running a Cobalt Raq4 and not having to much of luck running qmailadmin if i just run qmailadmin from a cgi-bin i get all sorts of ASCII characters on the screen. If i rename it to a .cgi i get CGIWrap Error: Execution of this script not permitted, Execution of (vpopmail) is not permitted for the following reason: User not Privileged Any ideas? And the times that i didn't get the error i enter postmaster, a domainname, and the password and I get a method POST not allowed for this URL. Any ideas or howto's to get this working? Thanks! - Zak Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator Nexpoint Technologies, Inc. http://www.ntidesign.com
Re: Enquiry
Pavel Kankovsky writes: > On Sat, 2 Jun 2001, Russell Nelson wrote: > > > Qmail doesn't need any queue management. > > Sure. Everything you need to do when your mail queue gets clogged with > 10,000 spam messages is to close your eyes and wait a week or two until > these messages and their undeliverable bounces time out and the queue > is cleared out in a natural way. ;) Sure. You may *wish* to do something about it, but it's not required. While those 10,000 spam messages are sitting in your queue (on average, 434 per directory; a reasonable size for a directory on ufs or e2fs), new emails will continue to be received and sent. Visualize sendmail with a 10,000 message queue. Or rather, don't, unless you wish to spoil an otherwise beautiful Sunday night / Monday morning. -- -russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://russnelson.com Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | Microsoft rivets everything. 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | Linux has some loose screws. Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | You own a screwdriver.
What about www.mail-abuse.org ?
Hi, Dear All Somebody are talking about www.orbs.org. What about www.mail-abuse.org? I think they're abusing their influence. Many sites are using their blacklist. So they should be very responsible for every IP address their list. For my instance, my server is on the RSS list because it WAS an open-relay server. Then I fixed the problem and sent a removal request. But mail-abuse.org said I blocked their mail server (I didn't. I don't know why). Now they even refuse my removal request on the web. According their "order", I had to mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], explaining why I blocked their server. But I just got an auto-relay that said I should submit removal request on the web. Dead loop :-( Any body kind enough to test if my server is third-party relay? Its IP address is 202.96.230.197 Best regards, Dai Yuwen __ === ÐÂÀËÃâ·Ñµç×ÓÓÊÏä (http://mail.sina.com.cn) ʹÓÃÊÖ»ú¶ÌÐÅ¡°ÓʼþÌáÐÑ¡±¹¦ÄÜ£¬ËæʱÁ˽âµÄÊÕÐÂÐÅÇé¿ö£¡ (http://sms.sina.com.cn/docs/sina_mailalert.html) ¶©ÔÄÊÖ»ú¶ÌÐŶ¥¼¶ÐÂÎÅÿÌìµÃпîÊÖ»ú´ó½±£¡ (http://dailynews.sina.com.cn/c/266499.html)
Re: What about www.mail-abuse.org ?
My test of your server indicates that you appropriately block relaying. -Tupshin - Original Message - From: "daiyuwen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2001 9:11 PM Subject: What about www.mail-abuse.org ? > Hi, Dear All > > Somebody are talking about www.orbs.org. > What about www.mail-abuse.org? I think they're abusing their influence. Many sites are using their blacklist. So they should be very responsible for every IP address their list. > > For my instance, my server is on the RSS list because it WAS an open-relay server. Then I fixed the problem and sent a removal request. But mail-abuse.org said I blocked their mail server (I didn't. I don't know why). Now they even refuse my removal request on the web. According their "order", I had to mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], explaining why I blocked their server. But I just got an auto-relay that said I should submit removal request on the web. Dead loop :-( > > Any body kind enough to test if my server is third-party relay? Its IP address is > 202.96.230.197 > > Best regards, > Dai Yuwen > __ > > === > ÐÂÀËÃâ·Ñµç×ÓÓÊÏä (http://mail.sina.com.cn) > ʹÓÃÊÖ»ú¶ÌÐÅ¡°ÓʼþÌáÐÑ¡±¹¦ÄÜ£¬ËæʱÁ˽âµÄÊÕÐÂÐÅÇé¿ö£¡ (http://sms.sina.com.cn/docs/sina_mailalert.html) > ¶©ÔÄÊÖ»ú¶ÌÐŶ¥¼¶ÐÂÎÅÿÌìµÃпîÊÖ»ú´ó½±£¡ (http://dailynews.sina.com.cn/c/266499.html) >
qmail on SCO OpenServer
Hi there, I am probably opening a long-running topic here, but here goes... I have just successfully compiled qmail on SCO OpenServer. However, it seems that my outgoing mail queue is getting "stuck". The log includes, Connected_to_..._but_connection_died._(#4.4.2)/ Running a "ps" shows qmail-remote sitting there, trying to deliver the queue. Local deliveries work just fine. I know similar messages have been posted to the list, and I apologise for the duplication, however I have spent the last two days pouring through the archives but unable to find the resolution (if there is one). Before you say anything I can't move to Linux just yet... Thanks for your time. Kind regards Jason
do I need to log
Hi I'm wondering, do I really need to log anything. Is this must or is it extra for debugging purpose. I just feel that there would be much improvement with the sending mail if my cpu did not have to bother with logging every email that's leaving my mailer. I mean I have millions of junk emails which none of them are important at all. I'm kinda of newbie but can someone confirm that It's okay to get rip of qmail-smtpd/log/run thanks in advance Sudong Lee http://newbieportal.com
Re: What about www.mail-abuse.org ?
On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 09:04:22PM -0700, Tupshin Harper allegedly wrote: > My test of your server indicates that you appropriately block relaying. (Let me say beforehand that I don't know anything about mail-abuse.org and whether they do or do not have this address listed, or indeed whether they have this address listed for valid reasons). The fact that some IPs are not accepted for relaying does not mean that all are. It may well be, for example, that the IP in question relays mail from, say, all 202. addresses or all 202.96 addresses. Of course this is not a qmail related issue unless the original poster has a problem understanding relay protection with qmail and starts with a posting of his tcpserver rules and his expectations of what they do. Regards. > > -Tupshin > > - Original Message - > From: "daiyuwen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2001 9:11 PM > Subject: What about www.mail-abuse.org ? > > > > Hi, Dear All > > > > Somebody are talking about www.orbs.org. > > What about www.mail-abuse.org? I think they're abusing their influence. > Many sites are using their blacklist. So they should be very responsible > for every IP address their list. > > > > For my instance, my server is on the RSS list because it WAS an open-relay > server. Then I fixed the problem and sent a removal request. But > mail-abuse.org said I blocked their mail server (I didn't. I don't know > why). Now they even refuse my removal request on the web. According their > "order", I had to mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], explaining why I blocked their > server. But I just got an auto-relay that said I should submit removal > request on the web. Dead loop :-( > > > > Any body kind enough to test if my server is third-party relay? Its IP > address is > > 202.96.230.197 > > > > Best regards, > > Dai Yuwen > > __ > > > > === > > ÐÂÀËÃâ·Ñµç×ÓÓÊÏä (http://mail.sina.com.cn) > > ʹÓÃÊÖ»ú¶ÌÐÅ¡°ÓʼþÌáÐÑ¡±¹¦ÄÜ£¬ËæʱÁ˽âµÄÊÕÐÂÐÅÇé¿ö£¡ > (http://sms.sina.com.cn/docs/sina_mailalert.html) > > ¶©ÔÄÊÖ»ú¶ÌÐŶ¥¼¶ÐÂÎÅÿÌìµÃпîÊÖ»ú´ó½±£¡ > (http://dailynews.sina.com.cn/c/266499.html) > > >
Re: qmail on SCO OpenServer
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 02:16:20PM +1000, Jason Heskett allegedly wrote: > Hi there, > > I am probably opening a long-running topic here, but here goes... > I have just successfully compiled qmail on SCO OpenServer. However, it seems > that my outgoing mail queue is getting "stuck". Is that true for all outgoing mail or just some? > The log includes, > Connected_to_..._but_connection_died._(#4.4.2)/ > > Running a "ps" shows qmail-remote sitting there, trying to deliver the > queue. Does SCO has a truss or strace or some similar system call trace? If so, attach to the qmail-remote and show us the output. Yo may also want to get a tcpdump/snoop of the tcp traffic. > Local deliveries work just fine. > > I know similar messages have been posted to the list, and I apologise for > the duplication, You'll also note that SCO in general is not well loved/supported by djbware. The problem seems to be that the tcp/ip stack sucks - to use a technical term. > Before you say anything I can't move to Linux just yet... That still leaves any of the BSD variants then :> Regards.
Re: do I need to log
On Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 02:28:31AM +, NewBiePortal allegedly wrote: > > Hi > > I'm wondering, do I really need to log anything. Is this must or is it extra for >debugging purpose. I just feel that there would be much improvement with the sending >mail if my cpu did not have to bother with logging every email that's leaving my >mailer. I mean I have millions of junk emails which none of them are important at >all. > > I'm kinda of newbie but can someone confirm that It's okay to get rip of > qmail-smtpd/log/run It's entirely up to you. I wish I was lucky enough to work on an email system that has "millions of junk emails" and which required no analysis or problem diagnosis or anything, ever! Just remember most problems have to be looked "back at" which is only possible with some sort of log. Of course the fact that your system does have "millions of junk emails" suggests that something is very wrong in the first instant - something like being abused as an open-relay that a log might well identify.. But as I say, it's your server. There is the final point that you don't know what your logging really costs. How much of a "bother" is it to your CPU? Have you measured it or are you speculating? Is the bother greater than that or the "millions of junk emails" that you might be able to eliminate? Regards.
whether original sender can receiver a notic mail when mail can't send?
Hello all: I have two question. 1. I want to know how to process when qmail received a not exist user in qmail server. which program to process, is qmail-send ? whether original sender can receiver a notic mail? 2. About quota ,when user mail sizes execd max quota size,qmail how to process, or qmail-local error . whether original sender can receiver a notic mail? Thank you.
whether original sender can receiver a notic mail when mail can't send?
Hello all: I have two question. 1. I want to know how to process when qmail received a not exist user in qmail server. which program to process, is qmail-send ? whether original sender can receiver a notic mail? 2. About quota ,when user mail sizes execd max quota size,qmail how to process, or qmail-local error . whether original sender can receiver a notic mail? Thank you.
How filter a special mail address or subject when receiver all mail ?
Hello : I use qmail+mysql system in SunOS.I want to filter a special mail address or subject or content when qmail server receiver all mail. How to do ? Thank you!
Re: How filter a special mail address or subject when receiver allmail.
On Sun, 3 Jun 2001, George Xu wrote: > I use qmail+mysql system in SunOS.I want to filter a special mail > address or subject or content when qmail server receiver all mail. Make procmail your MDA, and set up a global procmailrc file that does whatever you like with the mail. As long as the message hasn't been delivered in the global procmailrc, execution falls through to the user's .procmailrc when the recipe falls off the end of the global rc. That said, a dot-qmail file will override any procmail delivery recipes, so this isn't a good solution if you're trying to force something on un-cooperative users, since they can more or less bypass your global configs. -- Todd A. Jacobs CodeGnome Consulting, LTD
Re: whether original sender can receiver a notic mail when mailcan't send?
On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, george wrote: > 1. I want to know how to process when qmail received a not exist user qmail will automatically return a failure message to the originator if the local recipient does not exist. > 2. About quota ,when user mail sizes execd max quota size,qmail how > to process, or qmail-local error . The same. qmail handles this automatically. -- Todd A. Jacobs CodeGnome Consulting, LTD