installation testing and logging failure

2001-07-24 Thread Indra Riawan

i've read all available docs ,..

i've complete my installation.
but i thing something wrong there.i could not find anything in my
/var/log/maillog, so i couldn't
send any messages to local or remote users. so how i fix this ???

and, next i try using starting script to star my qmail but i got wrong
there,. i machhine is RH 6.2 and my qmail is 1.03 i've been tried to
writing by hand and it wrong, and then i try to download from crypto but
give same error, how could i fix ???

++
| SaveOurCountry |
++




qmail security

2001-07-24 Thread Suyanta Satria



dear all,

i have mail server using qmail and running 
properly.
how can i testing my mail server ? (secure or 
not)
what kind of testing that i sould do ?

regards



yayan


virtualdomains

2001-07-24 Thread Nick

My question is about virtualdomains file

test.com:peter
this puts the .qmail-alias files in /home/peter
say I want all qmail alias files to be in /home/peter/qmail directory.

Is this possible ?

-
Regards 
Nick 
Wildthing Communications 
 ICQ# 64851373 
-




Re: DNS bug: CNAME_lookup_failed_temporarily

2001-07-24 Thread Vu Xuan Ngoc

Thank you for everybody.
I have succeeded. I have deleted all and install again, now it don't infor the
error




Qmail resending multiple times...

2001-07-24 Thread Darren Kukulka

Hi,

Just wanting to know if anyone has solved this behaviour...

We are running SMTP redirects via Qmail 1.03 through to a Mimesweeper mail
host.

Most messages make it through quite happily but every now and then we get
ones that hang around and get retransmitted, usually with the following
appearing in the log ;

delivery x: deferral:
Connected_to_xx.xx.xx.xx_but_connection_died._Possible_duplicate!_(#4.4.2)

Have been around the web to find someone else with a solution but to no
avail - closest I came to was some guy suggesting to check if the source
mail contained Bare CR's (think he was referring to bare carriage returns
but not sure).

Any ideas ?

Cheers,
Darren Kukulka
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



the way to read mail's header

2001-07-24 Thread Vu Xuan Ngoc

I is using Ezmlm + Qmail.  I want to have a script to check mail's
source IP address ( so I want read mail's header),  my purpose is to
reject some IP (don't permit some IP address send to my mailing list)

For instance I have a mailing list is listname@domain. When someone
send mail to listname@domain  , my alias file (.qmail-listname) first
check mail's source IP address.






installation testing and logging failure

2001-07-24 Thread Essy Ren



try to check it via /var/qmail/log/currentif u 
interest in instalation qmail, i've a doc about that from my 
experienceintsalling at slackwareEssy Lestari 
PribadiCorporate Technology 
ServicesPlasmediaPhone: 
+6221 7982880Fax: +6221 7982881Company Website: www.plasmedia.com"This 
e-mail is for the designated recipient only and may contain privilegedor 
confidential information. If you have received it in error or unintendeduse, 
please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any otheruse 
of the e-mail is prohibited."- Original Message -From: 
Indra Riawan [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, 
July 24, 2001 1:43 PMSubject: installation testing and logging 
failure i've read all available docs ,.. i've 
complete my installation. but i thing something wrong there.i could not 
find anything in my /var/log/maillog, so i couldn't send any 
messages to local or remote users. so how i fix this ??? and, 
next i try using starting script to star my qmail but i got wrong 
there,. i machhine is RH 6.2 and my qmail is 1.03 i've been tried to 
writing by hand and it wrong, and then i try to download from crypto but 
give same error, how could i fix ??? 
++ | SaveOurCountry | 
++


failure notice message

2001-07-24 Thread W. Ruangsang

Hi,All

Can I change content in failure notice message ?
such as...

Hi. This is the qmail-send program at gits.net.th.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.

Can I change it ?

ThankYou+
OneR.






Re: Vmailmgr compile problems

2001-07-24 Thread Henning Brauer

On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 08:28:42PM -0400, Gary MacKay wrote:
 I've setup a new qmail/courier-imap server and all is well except for
 vmailmgr. 

You are on the wrong list. PLease use bruce's list for his software.

-- 
* Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de *
* Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany   *
Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity.
(Dennis Ritchie)



Re: How can we Inplement the mailing list in qmail

2001-07-24 Thread Henning Brauer

On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 09:52:03AM +0530, Sandeep Goel wrote:
 
 How can we implement mailing list in qmail-ldap

a) read http://www.lifewithqmail.org/ldap/, there's a whole section about that
b) use the correct list, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
* Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de *
* Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany   *
Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity.
(Dennis Ritchie)



Re: Qmail resending multiple times...

2001-07-24 Thread Henning Brauer

On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 03:33:49PM +0800, Darren Kukulka wrote:
 Hi,
 
 Just wanting to know if anyone has solved this behaviour...
 
 We are running SMTP redirects via Qmail 1.03 through to a Mimesweeper mail
 host.

 delivery x: deferral:
 Connected_to_xx.xx.xx.xx_but_connection_died._Possible_duplicate!_(#4.4.2)

Mimesweeper did not reply with a 250 ak after the DATA phase, so qmail
cannot be sure that the mail will be delivered. It _must_ resend it. Fix
Mimesweeper.

-- 
* Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de *
* Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany   *
Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity.
(Dennis Ritchie)



Strange behaviour

2001-07-24 Thread Lars Hansson

I experienced some, imho, weird qmail behaviour today and I'm curious as to what could 
possibly have caused it.
My qmail installation have been running happily without any problems at all for months 
but today, for no apparent reason, qmail-send stopped working.
The only changes I had done to the system was to move some aliases from /etc/aliases 
to .~alias/.qmail-whatever. After running newaliases (the version from the 
fastforward package) qmail-send stopped working. It probably had not been working for 
a few minutes but this was when i noticed it.
the qmail-send log shows occurances of the following starting some 10 minutes before i 
noticed the problem:
delivery 136988: failure: Unable_to_run_qmail-remote./
delivery 136987: deferral: Unable_to_run_qmail-getpw./
warning: trouble injecting bounce message, will try later

Running /service/qmail-send/run manually produced nothing but an immediate return to 
the prompt without any kind of output or messages. Same when running /var/qmail/rc.
Charles Cazabon's queue-repair reported that some messages in the queue was owned by 
the wrong user but fixing this, using queue-repair -r, did not rememedy the 
situation.
After some time looking at configuration files and wondering what the hell could be 
wrong I decided to run the (in?)famous make setup check from the patched sources. 
Well, what do you know, suddenly it works again, patches and all.

What I am wondering is what could possibly have caused this, apparent, corruption of 
the binaries?

The system:
Slackware Linux (kernel 2.2.13)
Qmail with qmailqueue,ext2 sync and tarpit patches
Mail is delivered to /var/spool/mail
fastforward with /etc/aliases
qmail-scanner using hbdev's scanning engine. 

-- 
Lars Hansson  Technical Consultant/System Administrator
UNET, Inc.Makati City, Philippines
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Public key: http://www.unet.net.ph/~lars/gpgkey.txt


 PGP signature


Re: failure notice message

2001-07-24 Thread Henning Brauer

On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 02:49:02PM +0700, W. Ruangsang wrote:
 Hi,All
 
 Can I change content in failure notice message ?
 such as...
 
 Hi. This is the qmail-send program at gits.net.th.
 I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
 This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
 
 Can I change it ?

Only in the source, and I'd better not do that. You will most likely break
http://cr.yp.to/proto/qsbmf.txt

-- 
* Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de *
* Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany   *
Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity.
(Dennis Ritchie)



ezmlm 0.53 ezmlm-send -C options

2001-07-24 Thread vlad

Hello evryone. I found the part 'Configuring the list so posts are not
copied to the original sender' in the documentation, and correct the
DIR/editor ezmlm-send line  from source to folowing:
--
ezmlm-send -C '/home/vpopmail/domains/domain.com/list'
--
and this don't work, copy of messages rturn to sender. one strange, in
documentation wroted that '-C' option no longer supported, and now
ingored, but below manual contain small article about switch -C.
anybody can clear th situation? where are mistake?

-- 
Best regards,
 vlad  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]





Re: ezmlm 0.53 ezmlm-send -C options

2001-07-24 Thread Henning Brauer

On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 01:59:11PM +0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 ezmlm-send -C '/home/vpopmail/domains/domain.com/list'

You are on the wrong list. Please use the ezmlm list.

-- 
* Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de *
* Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany   *
Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity.
(Dennis Ritchie)



SMTP error

2001-07-24 Thread Per-fredrik Pollnow (EPK)

Hi,

I was wondering, I get this error: 
warning: dropping connection, unable to read /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb: file does not exist

Ok, the file does not exist.. but were is it... do I have to install something more ? 
(I have installed ucspi-tcp-0.88 ).. 

and i'm using OpenBSD 2.9.. Thanx



help me please

2001-07-24 Thread andi hari


i am turn over my qmail sistem from inetd to tcpserver
but when i want to know maillog file like /var/log/maillog
it's empty

can u give me an advice ...where is my new maillog
in order to know error delivery mail

thanks before



andihari





Re: SMTP error

2001-07-24 Thread Dushyanth Harinath

check the qmail faq
regards
dushyanth

 Hi,
 
 I was wondering, I get this error: 
 warning: dropping connection, unable to read /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb: file
 does not exist
 
 Ok, the file does not exist.. but were is it... do I have to install
 something more ? (I have installed ucspi-tcp-0.88 ).. 
 
 and i'm using OpenBSD 2.9.. Thanx


-- 
Dushyanth Harinath
Archean Infotech Limited
Ph No:091-040-3228666,6570704,3228674
http://www.archeanit.com



-
This email was sent using SquirrelMail.
   Webmail for nuts!
http://squirrelmail.org/





Re: help me please

2001-07-24 Thread Dushyanth Harinath

whats the command line ur using..
regards
dushyanth

 
 i am turn over my qmail sistem from inetd to tcpserver
 but when i want to know maillog file like /var/log/maillog
 it's empty
 
 can u give me an advice ...where is my new maillog
 in order to know error delivery mail
 
 thanks before
 
 
 
 andihari


-- 
Dushyanth Harinath
Archean Infotech Limited
Ph No:091-040-3228666,6570704,3228674
http://www.archeanit.com



-
This email was sent using SquirrelMail.
   Webmail for nuts!
http://squirrelmail.org/





Re: help me please

2001-07-24 Thread andi hari


tail -f 

usually i use tail -f /var/log/maillog ( if under inetd )
but now i run qmail under tcp server..

any suggest sir


andihari





Re: help me please

2001-07-24 Thread Henning Brauer

On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 05:54:30PM +0700, andi hari wrote:
 
 tail -f 
 
 usually i use tail -f /var/log/maillog ( if under inetd )
 but now i run qmail under tcp server..

Read http://www.lifewithqmail.org/
Really.

-- 
* Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de *
* Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany   *
Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity.
(Dennis Ritchie)



OT: ezmlm.org offline?!

2001-07-24 Thread Markus Hempfling

Does somebody knows a mirror?

Greets
markus

 -Ursprungliche Nachricht-
 Von: Henning Brauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Gesendet: Dienstag, 24. Juli 2001 13:01
 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Betreff: Re: help me please
 
 
 On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 05:54:30PM +0700, andi hari wrote:
  
  tail -f
  
  usually i use tail -f /var/log/maillog ( if under inetd )
  but now i run qmail under tcp server..
 
 Read http://www.lifewithqmail.org/
 Really.
 
 -- 
 * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de *
 * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany   *
 Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the 
 simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
 




Re: help me please

2001-07-24 Thread Dushyanth Harinath

i mean the tcpserver command line not tail -f or whatever
read lifewithqmail.org as Henning suggested.


 
 tail -f 
 
 usually i use tail -f /var/log/maillog ( if under inetd )
 but now i run qmail under tcp server..
 
 any suggest sir
 
 
 andihari


-- 
Dushyanth Harinath
Archean Infotech Limited
Ph No:091-040-3228666,6570704,3228674
http://www.archeanit.com



-
This email was sent using SquirrelMail.
   Webmail for nuts!
http://squirrelmail.org/





QSBMF

2001-07-24 Thread Andreas Grip

I know, this has been in the list too many times...

Anyway, I have reeded some of the threads with discussion about this.
They all start with someone who want to change the content of the bounce
message.

The arguments used to not change the bounce message is that it will
probably broke the QSBMF format. And there is a lot of people who say
they can not se any reason to change the content in these messages. Well
there is a good reason, there is not only english speaking people in the
world.

I have readed about the QSBMF format and here are some thoughts:

First of all, the start in this message is not good for a automatic
sended message. A message starting with Hi looks like an mail written
by a human person and can be confusing for them who just know a little
english.
A much better way to start this kind of message is This is a automatic
generated failure message from qmail bla bla bla
But I realise this is to late to change now. So I hope noone will,
because it will make a lot of trubble for mailing list servers.

Changing the first paragraph, will not break the QSBMF format as long it
start with Hi. This is the because that is what identifies these
messages.

After the first paragraph in this message there is a paragraph with the
recipient adress that failed. The fisrt line of this paragraph begins
whit  and it ends with : The remaing lines in this paragraph can
be changed to whatever you want.

I think there should be no problem to add paragraphs in diffrent
languages between the first paragraph and the one with the recipient
address that failed without break the QSBMF format so it not works. Here
is the reason why: Paragraphs beginning with other characters are
reserved for future extensions. Paragraphes what not begin with Hi.
This is the,  and - is reserved for future use. So if a program
handling QSBMF do not work because of adding a paragraph in another
langue that not begins on those ways, that program do not follow the
QSBMF program and is broken.

And because of many has requested to write this message in diffrent
languages, I think a paragraph for language independent messages should
be considered into the QSBMF format. I mean there is paragraphes
reserved for future use. And maybe the future is here now.

For them who want to change the message, I think you can go ahead and do
it. As long the first paragraph start with Hi. This is the and the
recipient paragraph first line is not changed. And the end with the
break paragraph with starting with - is still where and the original
message after that.

If someone add paragraphes in diffrent languages there could be a good
idea to start it with a alpha-character so there still can be other
paragraphes added in the future starting with other characters. But I
think a good idea could be to have all text in the message in english to
because of that is the most used language on the internet.

Program using bounce message for any reason, that not can handle a
bounce message that is like this is broken and should be fixed.

Andreas



Changed hostnames need to requeue mail, and have hostname changed

2001-07-24 Thread Errol Casey

Recently, my dynamic DNS provider yi.org stopped working.

So, I've changed to a homeip.net hostname. I've changed my
qmail control files, including me -- but I have a few messages
that were enqueued with the old hostname.

How can I get these messages, changed so they will be sent out.

The mail is failing since the old hostname is unresolvable.

(I've changed email addresses, but I need to change the
enqueued messages from @bad.org to @bad.homeip.net; I
tried looking in archives under requeue and change hostname
but didn't find anything relavent)

[root@bad queue]# qmail queue
messages in queue: 4
messages in queue but not yet preprocessed: 0
23 Jul 2001 21:00:03 GMT  #291693  6830  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
remote  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
23 Jul 2001 21:48:30 GMT  #291694  1475  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
remote  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
24 Jul 2001 03:31:23 GMT  #291648  2326  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
remote  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
24 Jul 2001 03:47:33 GMT  #291654  1003  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
remote  [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
Errol Casey
http://www.askerrol.org http://www.boo-bear.com
http://www.rtpnet.org   http://www.ncarrl.org
(GPG Key: Send email with Subject: send gpg )



Re: QSBMF

2001-07-24 Thread Johan Almqvist

* Andreas Grip [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010724 13:37]:
 I know, this has been in the list too many times...

Okay, so let's go to http://cr.yp.to/proto/qsbmf.txt and find out what the
final truth is.

Yes, you can make your own bounce messages. And yes, you can make them
QSBMF-compliant. The trick is to keep the first paragraph from the
original, and sticking you own text below _with_no_blank_lines_in_between._

You could, of course, have a line containing only a space between the
original text and your text. Or, if you don't trust all parsers, a dash or
two - but not three!

Example:

 --- snip ---
Date: 17 Mar 1996 03:54:40 -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: failure notice

Hi. This is the qmail-send program at silverton.berkeley.edu.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the
following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up.
Sorry it didn't work out.
 - 
Hej. Detta är programmet qmail-send på silverton.berkeley.edu.
Jag kunde tyvärr inte leverera meddelandet till följande
adresser. Detta är ett permanent fel; jag har gett upp.
Ledsen att det inte fungerade.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Sorry, I couldn't find any host by that name.

--- Below this line is a copy of the message.

Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 317 invoked by uid 7); 17 Mar 1996 03:54:38 -
Date: 17 Mar 1996 03:54:38 -
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (D. J. Bernstein)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: are you there?

Just checking.
 --- snap ---

Or, you may want to find a less strict (and less funny-sounding) swedish
translation. [Who is the Mailer-Daemon and why is he reading my mail?]

-Johan
-- 
Johan Almqvist
http://www.almqvist.net/johan/qmail/

 PGP signature


Re: QSBMF

2001-07-24 Thread Andreas Grip



Johan Almqvist wrote:
 
 * Andreas Grip [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010724 13:37]:
  I know, this has been in the list too many times...
 
 Okay, so let's go to http://cr.yp.to/proto/qsbmf.txt and find out what the
 final truth is.
 
 Yes, you can make your own bounce messages. And yes, you can make them
 QSBMF-compliant. The trick is to keep the first paragraph from the
 original, and sticking you own text below _with_no_blank_lines_in_between._

 You could, of course, have a line containing only a space between the
 original text and your text. Or, if you don't trust all parsers, a dash or
 two - but not three!

There should be no problem to have a blank line either. Beacuse the
recipt paragraph always begins with . And all other paragraphs is
reserved for future use. And I guess there would be no future version of
QSBMF...
 
 Example:
 
  --- snip ---
 Date: 17 Mar 1996 03:54:40 -
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: failure notice
 
 Hi. This is the qmail-send program at silverton.berkeley.edu.
 I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the
 following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up.
 Sorry it didn't work out.
  -
 Hej. Detta är programmet qmail-send på silverton.berkeley.edu.
 Jag kunde tyvärr inte leverera meddelandet till följande
 adresser. Detta är ett permanent fel; jag har gett upp.
 Ledsen att det inte fungerade.
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 Sorry, I couldn't find any host by that name.
 
 --- Below this line is a copy of the message.
 
 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Received: (qmail 317 invoked by uid 7); 17 Mar 1996 03:54:38 -
 Date: 17 Mar 1996 03:54:38 -
 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (D. J. Bernstein)
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: are you there?
 
 Just checking.
  --- snap ---
 
 Or, you may want to find a less strict (and less funny-sounding) swedish
 translation. [Who is the Mailer-Daemon and why is he reading my mail?]
 
 -Johan
 --
 Johan Almqvist
 http://www.almqvist.net/johan/qmail/
 
   
Part 1.2Type: application/pgp-signature



Re: QSBMF

2001-07-24 Thread Adrian Ho

On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 01:37:50PM +0200, Andreas Grip wrote:
 I know, this has been in the list too many times...

Then you should've just pointed to, for instance:

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=qmailm=99366089430160w=2

As for the arguments for and against, it's more a matter of questioning
why the requester would want to do it, to see if there might be a neater
way of achieving his/her objective without hacking code.  Happens all the
time 'round these parts.  8-)

-- 
Adrian HoTinker, Drifter, Fixer, Bum   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ListArchive: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=qmail
Useful URLs: http://cr.yp.to/qmail.html http://www.qmail.org
 http://www.lifewithqmail.org/ http://qmail.faqts.com/



virtualdomains

2001-07-24 Thread Nick

My question is about virtualdomains file

test.com:peter
this puts the .qmail-alias files in /home/peter
say I want all qmail alias files to be in /home/peter/qmail directory.

Is this possible ?

-
Regards 
Nick 
Wildthing Communications 
 ICQ# 64851373 
-




Re: QSBMF

2001-07-24 Thread Andreas Grip



Johan Almqvist wrote:
 
 * Andreas Grip [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010724 14:30]:
  Johan Almqvist wrote:
   Okay, so let's go to http://cr.yp.to/proto/qsbmf.txt and find out what the
   final truth is.
   Yes, you can make your own bounce messages. And yes, you can make them
   QSBMF-compliant. The trick is to keep the first paragraph from the
   original, and sticking you own text below _with_no_blank_lines_in_between._
  There should be no problem to have a blank line either. Beacuse the
  recipt paragraph always begins with . And all other paragraphs is
  reserved for future use. And I guess there would be no future version of
  QSBMF...
 
 But that would violate QSBMF:
 
 The body of the message has four pieces: an introductory paragraph, zero
 or more recipient paragraphs, a break paragraph, and the original
 message.
 
 Each paragraph is a series of non-blank lines followed by a single blank
 line. 

But then QSBMF violate itself, because the QSBMF format include the
possibillity of other paragraphes in the futures.

 -Johan
 --
 Johan Almqvist
 http://www.almqvist.net/johan/qmail/
 
   
Part 1.2Type: application/pgp-signature



Re: Changed hostnames need to requeue mail, and have hostname changed

2001-07-24 Thread Errol Casey

I was able to finally figure out that the outgoing hostname
was in the /var/qmail/queue/info directories and was able
to manually change it and push out the queue.

If there is a better solution, let me know. Thanks for
the individual responses I've received so far.

On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 07:55:11AM -0400, Errol Casey wrote:
 Recently, my dynamic DNS provider yi.org stopped working.
 
 So, I've changed to a homeip.net hostname. I've changed my
 qmail control files, including me -- but I have a few messages
 that were enqueued with the old hostname.
 
 How can I get these messages, changed so they will be sent out.
 
 The mail is failing since the old hostname is unresolvable.
 
 (I've changed email addresses, but I need to change the
 enqueued messages from @bad.org to @bad.homeip.net; I
 tried looking in archives under requeue and change hostname
 but didn't find anything relavent)
 
 [root@bad queue]# qmail queue
 messages in queue: 4
 messages in queue but not yet preprocessed: 0
 23 Jul 2001 21:00:03 GMT  #291693  6830  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 remote  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 23 Jul 2001 21:48:30 GMT  #291694  1475  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 remote  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 24 Jul 2001 03:31:23 GMT  #291648  2326  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 remote  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 24 Jul 2001 03:47:33 GMT  #291654  1003  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 remote  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 -- 
 Errol Casey
 http://www.askerrol.org http://www.boo-bear.com
 http://www.rtpnet.org   http://www.ncarrl.org
 (GPG Key: Send email with Subject: send gpg )

-- 
Errol Casey
http://www.askerrol.org http://www.boo-bear.com
http://www.rtpnet.org   http://www.ncarrl.org
(GPG Key: Send email with Subject: send gpg )



Re: QSBMF

2001-07-24 Thread Johan Almqvist

* Andreas Grip [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010724 14:55]:
[...]
  But that would violate QSBMF:
  The body of the message has four pieces: an introductory paragraph, zero
  or more recipient paragraphs, a break paragraph, and the original
  message.
  Each paragraph is a series of non-blank lines followed by a single blank
  line. 
 But then QSBMF violate itself, because the QSBMF format include the
 possibillity of other paragraphes in the futures.

No! The recipient paragraphs could look as follows:

 --- snip ---
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Sorry, I couldn't find any host by that name.

([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
This message was delivered without problems.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This message was delivered with lossy MIME conversion.
 --- snap ---

To quote:

The only type of recipient paragraph described here is a failure
paragraph, which begins with the character . Paragraphs beginning
with other characters are reserved for future extensions.

Implicitly, this means that future extensions only are possible for
recipient paragraphs.

-Johan
-- 
Johan Almqvist
http://www.almqvist.net/johan/qmail/

 PGP signature


Re: Auto CC

2001-07-24 Thread Peter van Dijk

On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 02:09:27PM -0600, Nathan Cook wrote:
 Thank you.  After reading the mail from Peter I was able to solve my problem by
 putting this in the .qmail file in the home directory.

RTFM in it's finest form. Great :)

Greetz, Peter
-- 
Against Free Sex!   http://www.dataloss.nl/Megahard_en.html



Re: Inode allocation / qmail-queue?

2001-07-24 Thread Peter van Dijk

On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 02:41:22PM -0600, Mike Hodson wrote:
 Hello there.
 I have been noticing slightly out of the ordinary things happening in my
 qmail-send logs after changing the queue filesystem over to reiserfs.
 I am seeing the same inode used for multiple messages. Is this normal?

Yes, this is perfectly normal. Once a message is delivered, an inode
number becomes available. Depending on how a filesystem allocates
inodes, this may mean the number is immediately reused. If you have
lots of logfiles from qmail running on an ext2fs disk, I guarantee you
will see some inode-numbers being used more than once too.

Greetz, Peter
-- 
Against Free Sex!   http://www.dataloss.nl/Megahard_en.html



Which RBL replacement?

2001-07-24 Thread Paulo Jan

Hi all:

Starting Jul 31 RBL will start charging for using their services. Which
of the free RBL replacement do people recommend? I have read so far
about ORBL and ORBS...




Paulo Jan.
DDnet.



Migrating an outsourced webmail system to qmail

2001-07-24 Thread Andrew Richards

Hi,

I hope list members will forgive my impudence: Leaving the
list for a few months, then coming back asking big questions.

Anyway: I'm looking at migrating an existing (outsourced)
webmail system for a client. I need to migrate:
  - Messages (often arranged into folders by the mailbox
owner)
  - Settings (vacation message turned on etc.)
  - Address books

This is obviously not so straightforward as just moving from
one POP3 style system to another, since more than just
the messages need to be transferred. I'm currently looking
at 2 possibilities,
  - Get the outsourcer to provide my client with IMAP
facilities, which could then permit me to replicate the
messages and folders by using IMAP tools.
  - Using a tool to replicate html at both sides, putting
hooks into the target side to actually change settings
rather than recreate a web page that looks the same
(but doesn't set the users settings).
I'd anticipate using both of these tools together, or perhaps
just the second tool. The second tool might use something
like Expect. XML has also been mentioned. 

That's as far as my thought processes have got, and I am
feeling out of my depth, so I'd appreciate any input from
list members if they've done anything like this themselves,
or have other approaches to the problem, or can suggest
specific tools that may help.

Big question! Sorry people.

cheers,

Andrew.




Re: Qmail resending multiple times...

2001-07-24 Thread Jeff_D_Sweeten

This is indicative of the Mimesweeper machine not being able to handle the
volume being passed it from the qmail machine.  We've had the same issues and
the group responsible for Mimesweeper (and in our case Mailsweeper) had to add
additional load balanced machines to keep up with qmail.

I reject their suggestion of reducing my concurrency since that only pushes the
problem back to sender.

Jeff Sweeten
Sr. Internet Engineer
Aon
200 E Randolph
Chicago, Il 60601






Darren Kukulka [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 07/24/2001 02:33:49 AM

To:   '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: Jeff D Sweeten/ASC/US/AON)

Subject:  Qmail resending multiple times...



Hi,

Just wanting to know if anyone has solved this behaviour...

We are running SMTP redirects via Qmail 1.03 through to a Mimesweeper mail
host.

Most messages make it through quite happily but every now and then we get
ones that hang around and get retransmitted, usually with the following
appearing in the log ;

delivery x: deferral:
Connected_to_xx.xx.xx.xx_but_connection_died._Possible_duplicate!_(#4.4.2)

Have been around the web to find someone else with a solution but to no
avail - closest I came to was some guy suggesting to check if the source
mail contained Bare CR's (think he was referring to bare carriage returns
but not sure).

Any ideas ?

Cheers,
Darren Kukulka
[EMAIL PROTECTED]







Re: Which RBL replacement?

2001-07-24 Thread Johan Almqvist

* Paulo Jan [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010724 15:29]:
   Starting Jul 31 RBL will start charging for using their services. Which
 of the free RBL replacement do people recommend? I have read so far
 about ORBL and ORBS...

Take a look at
http://www.almqvist.net/johan/qmail/rbldomains.txt

I will make a more complete page with links etc in the future...

-Johan
-- 
Johan Almqvist
http://www.almqvist.net/johan/qmail/

 PGP signature


Re: QSBMF

2001-07-24 Thread Greg Matheson

On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Andreas Grip wrote:

 A message starting with Hi looks like an mail written by a
 human person and can be confusing for them who just know a
 little english.

 A much better way to start this kind of message is This is a
 automatic generated failure message from qmail bla bla bla

Automatic, generated, failure and message are more difficult
words than Hi, This, is, and program, for the non-English
speaker.

However, perhaps you're right. In any case, I'm afraid I wasn't
able to deliver your message to the following addresses, 
is not as simple as, Problem: message NOT sent.

-- 
Greg MathesonThink globally.
Chinmin College, Act locally.
Taiwan   Think one thing, do another.



Having problems with postmaster....

2001-07-24 Thread David Gartner

Hey all...

I have a problem, that's not _really_ a problem, but I've had someone complain, so
I figured I should fix it.  I always put .qmail-postmaster in /var/qmail/alias and
point it to an account on the system.  It's always worked, except on one site.  It
rejects any mail for postmaster saying that there is no such user, but the
.qmail-postmaster file _is_ in place.  Does anyone know why, on this one system,
qmail disregards the .qmail file?  Thanks in advance.

David




Re: Qmail resending multiple times...

2001-07-24 Thread Adrian Ho

On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 08:39:27AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 This is indicative of the Mimesweeper machine not being able to handle the
 volume being passed it from the qmail machine.

If Mimesweeper's really closing down the connection for that reason, and
without returning any status code, that's an RFC 2821 violation (Section
3.9, para 2).  You could hit them with that, if you're so inclined.

-- 
Adrian HoTinker, Drifter, Fixer, Bum   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ListArchive: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=qmail
Useful URLs: http://cr.yp.to/qmail.html http://www.qmail.org
 http://www.lifewithqmail.org/ http://qmail.faqts.com/



Re: Which RBL replacement?

2001-07-24 Thread Roger Walker

   Starting Jul 31 RBL will start charging for using their services. Which
of the free RBL replacement do people recommend? I have read so far
about ORBL and ORBS...

I check them all. I am still discussing with my partner whether to
continue with Vixie, now that he is charging (our mail is a fairly small
operation). However, it really isn't THAT much, so we'll probably keep them
as well.

-- 
Roger Walker
Tier III Messaging/News Team
Internet Applications, National Consumer IP
TELUS Corporation 780-493-2471




Re: Which RBL replacement?

2001-07-24 Thread peter green

* Johan Almqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010724 09:53]:
 * Paulo Jan [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010724 15:29]:
  Starting Jul 31 RBL will start charging for using their services. Which
  of the free RBL replacement do people recommend? I have read so far
  about ORBL and ORBS...
 
 Take a look at
 http://www.almqvist.net/johan/qmail/rbldomains.txt

See also [http://www.declude.com/JunkMail/Support/ip4r.htm] for a list of
services. However, they don't come with any recommendation, which is what I
(like the OP) am looking for...

Johan (or anyone else), are you actually using all of those domains? I have
heard less-than-savory things about a number of them, IIRC:

  orbs.gst-group.co.uk
  manual.orbs.gst-group.co.uk
  inputs.orbz.org
  outputs.orbz.org

A couple of links to comments:

  [http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=inet-accessm=99320105921014w=2]
  [http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=inet-accessm=99322603208868w=2]

I am not as sure about the orbz.org thing...YMMV...

/pg
-- 
Peter Green : Architekton Internet Services, LLC : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Q. Why is this so clumsy?
A. The trick is to use Perl's strengths rather than its weaknesses.
--- Larry Wall in [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Having problems with postmaster....

2001-07-24 Thread Johan Almqvist

[Please do not start new threads by replying to unrelated messages.]

* David Gartner [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010724 15:55]:
 I have a problem, that's not _really_ a problem, but I've had someone
 complain, so I figured I should fix it.  I always put .qmail-postmaster
 in /var/qmail/alias and point it to an account on the system.  It's
 always worked, except on one site.  It rejects any mail for postmaster
 saying that there is no such user, but the .qmail-postmaster file _is_
 in place.  Does anyone know why, on this one system, qmail disregards
 the .qmail file?  Thanks in advance.

What do the logs say if you send a message to postmaster in that domain?
What does ls -lsa /var/qmail/alias say?
What does id alias give?
What does grep alias /etc/passwd give?

-Johan
-- 
Johan Almqvist
http://www.almqvist.net/johan/qmail/

 PGP signature


Re: Which RBL replacement?

2001-07-24 Thread Peter van Dijk

On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 08:04:15AM -0600, Roger Walker wrote:
  Starting Jul 31 RBL will start charging for using their services. Which
 of the free RBL replacement do people recommend? I have read so far
 about ORBL and ORBS...
 
   I check them all. I am still discussing with my partner whether to
 continue with Vixie, now that he is charging (our mail is a fairly small
 operation). However, it really isn't THAT much, so we'll probably keep them
 as well.

How does his charging system work, anyway?

Greetz, Peter
-- 
Against Free Sex!   http://www.dataloss.nl/Megahard_en.html



RE: Which RBL replacement?

2001-07-24 Thread Hubbard, David

Basically, if you have a lot of accounts, they
charge you a LOT of money:

http://www.mail-abuse.org/feestructure.html

They even feel the need to charge non-profit
educational institutions, very nice MAPS...

Dave

-Original Message-
From: Peter van Dijk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 10:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Which RBL replacement?


How does his charging system work, anyway?

Greetz, Peter
-- 
Against Free Sex!   http://www.dataloss.nl/Megahard_en.html



Re: Which RBL replacement?

2001-07-24 Thread Roger Walker

 Starting Jul 31 RBL will start charging for using their services.

How does his charging system work, anyway?

http://www.mailabuse.org/feestructure.html

-- 
Roger Walker
Tier III Messaging/News Team
Internet Applications, National Consumer IP
TELUS Corporation 780-493-2471




what can be done about 'in order to have your advice...'

2001-07-24 Thread cfm


Can anyone help me figure out a way to handle this recent virus?

It typically tags email in body:
   '...in order to have your advice...'

and sends random attachments .2 to 2Mb in size.

We're getting a lot of these already, and I'm worried
that a flood will jam us up, amounting to a DOS.  At the very
least, this is going to cost us a lot of bandwidth $$$.

Seems to me the only way to stop it is to scan the body before 
the mail is accepted.  Yeech.  And as soon as we get variations on
'...in order to have your advice...' it will be just about
indistinguishable from normal email with attachments.

All I can think of is setting up a colocated MX where bandwidth
is cheap and filtering all mail there, then accepting only from
that IP.  Hmmm, is there a mailscrubber.com ASP that provides that 
service reliably?

cfm

-- 

Christopher F. Miller, Publisher   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MaineStreet Communications, Inc   208 Portland Road, Gray, ME  04039
1.207.657.5078 http://www.maine.com/
Content/site management, online commerce, internet integration, Debian linux



RE: Compiling on Solaris 8

2001-07-24 Thread Mike Jimenez

I do have gcc Installed? And I am able to compile other programs with no
errors.
Thanks
Mike

-Original Message-
From: Keary Suska [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 7:22 PM
To: Qmail List
Subject: Re: Compiling on Solaris 8


Install gcc, and use it instead.

Keary Suska
Esoteritech, Inc.
Leveraging Open Source for a better Internet

 From: Mike Jimenez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 17:14:10 -0700
 To: Qmail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Compiling on Solaris 8

 When I try to compile I get this error what do I need to do to fix?
 Thanks

 bash-2.03# make setup check
 ( cat warn-auto.sh; \
 echo CC=\'`head -1 conf-cc`\'; \
 echo LD=\'`head -1 conf-ld`\' \
 )  auto-ccld.sh
 cat auto-ccld.sh make-load.sh  make-load
 chmod 755 make-load
 cat auto-ccld.sh find-systype.sh  find-systype
 chmod 755 find-systype
 ./find-systype  systype
 ( cat warn-auto.sh; ./make-load `cat systype` )  load
 chmod 755 load
 cat auto-ccld.sh make-compile.sh  make-compile
 chmod 755 make-compile
 ( cat warn-auto.sh; ./make-compile `cat systype` )  \
 compile
 chmod 755 compile
 ( ( ./compile tryvfork.c  ./load tryvfork ) /dev/null \
 21 \
  cat fork.h2 || cat fork.h1 )  fork.h
 rm -f tryvfork.o tryvfork
 ./compile qmail-local.c
 /usr/ucb/cc:  language optional software package not installed
 make: *** [qmail-local.o] Error 1
 bash-2.03#







mailsize limit

2001-07-24 Thread Frank Moeller

Hi all.
 
I'd like to do some mailsize limiting with qmail and I'm wondering
if there's a simple way to do this:
 
- external to local should be limited to i.e. 5Mb
- local to local mail should be unlimited
 
What I'm looking for is some kind of domain dependend maximum mail size
limiting...
 
Thanks in advance,

Frank
-- 
Dipl.-Phys. Frank Moller [EMAIL PROTECTED] System Engineering
* GONICUS GmbH * Moehnestrasse 11-17 * 59755 Arnsberg
* Tel.: +49 (0) 29 32 / 9 16 - 0 * Fax: +49 (0) 29 32 / 9 16 - 230
* http://www.GONICUS.de



Re: mailsize limit

2001-07-24 Thread Magnus Bodin

On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 05:04:25PM +0200, Frank Moeller wrote:
 Hi all.
  
 I'd like to do some mailsize limiting with qmail and I'm wondering
 if there's a simple way to do this:
  
 - external to local should be limited to i.e. 5Mb
 - local to local mail should be unlimited
  
 What I'm looking for is some kind of domain dependend maximum mail size
 limiting...

You can set the environment variable DATABYTES
in your tcp.smtp-file (that I assume you use and compile to tcp.smtp.cdb,
and use with tcpserver according to life with qmail).

Just like you set RELAYCLIENT=, you can set DATABYTES there to different
values. 

Set DATABYTES TO 0 if you don't want any limit.
set it to something else to limit.

/magnus

-- 
Unfortunately, those people who have nothing better to do than post on the
 Internet all day long are rarely the ones who have the most insights.
   - Jakob Nielsen, August 1997



Re: Compiling on Solaris 8

2001-07-24 Thread Adrian Ho

On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 08:02:20AM -0700, Mike Jimenez wrote:
 I do have gcc Installed? And I am able to compile other programs with no
 errors.

Like Keary said, /use/ it.  Either:

echo gcc -O2  conf-cc
echo gcc -s  conf-ld

or fix your path so that it doesn't pick up /usr/ucb/cc first.

  /usr/ucb/cc:  language optional software package not installed

-- 
Adrian HoTinker, Drifter, Fixer, Bum   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ListArchive: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=qmail
Useful URLs: http://cr.yp.to/qmail.html http://www.qmail.org
 http://www.lifewithqmail.org/ http://qmail.faqts.com/



scan-4-virus NAI not stopping SirCam

2001-07-24 Thread John McCoy, Jr.

Anybody else got this issue? I'm using .95 and latest DAT (7/22)

Thanks all.


John McCoy, Jr
Central Systems Administrator
Mills College, Oakland, CA
510-430-3321
[EMAIL PROTECTED]






Re: scan-4-virus NAI not stopping SirCam

2001-07-24 Thread Chris Garrigues

 From:  John McCoy, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date:  Tue, 24 Jul 2001 08:54:10 -0700

 Anybody else got this issue? I'm using .95 and latest DAT (7/22)

qmail-scanner-0.90 and uvscan-v4.1.40/v4149 are stopping it just fine.

Chris

-- 
Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
virCIO  http://www.virCIO.Com
4314 Avenue C   
Austin, TX  78751-3709  +1 512 374 0500

  My email address is an experiment in SPAM elimination.  For an
  explanation of what we're doing, see http://www.DeepEddy.Com/tms.html 

Nobody ever got fired for buying Microsoft,
  but they could get fired for relying on Microsoft.



 PGP signature


Alias for a subdomain

2001-07-24 Thread Jeff Mayes

Hi
I want qmail to accept mail sent to a subdomain, but send the message
to the same user on the domain.  Like this:

mail to:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is accepted and then actually delivered to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

This seems pretty simple, but the newbie is still in me.
Thanks
Jeff




Re: Which RBL replacement?

2001-07-24 Thread Adam McKenna

On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 03:29:15PM +0200, Paulo Jan wrote:
 Hi all:
 
   Starting Jul 31 RBL will start charging for using their services. Which
 of the free RBL replacement do people recommend? I have read so far
 about ORBL and ORBS...

http://software.libertine.org/tmda/

Blocks spam better than any RBL ever did.

I'm still thinking about setting up a new RBL though.  But it's going to be
different than any previous RBL in a very important way.  I'll discuss more
once I've made up my mind.

--Adam

-- 
Adam McKenna [EMAIL PROTECTED]   | Help stop animal abuse at Petco!
http://flounder.net/publickey.html | http://www.mickaboofriends.org
GPG: 17A4 11F7 5E7E C2E7 08AA  |
 38B0 05D0 8BF7 2C6D 110A  |



Re: Having problems with postmaster....

2001-07-24 Thread David Gartner

Johan Almqvist wrote:

 [Please do not start new threads by replying to unrelated messages.]

Eh? Me?



 * David Gartner [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010724 15:55]:
  I have a problem, that's not _really_ a problem, but I've had
someone
  complain, so I figured I should fix it.  I always put
.qmail-postmaster
  in /var/qmail/alias and point it to an account on the system.  It's
  always worked, except on one site.  It rejects any mail for
postmaster
  saying that there is no such user, but the .qmail-postmaster file
_is_
  in place.  Does anyone know why, on this one system, qmail
disregards
  the .qmail file?  Thanks in advance.

 What do the logs say if you send a message to postmaster in that
domain?

@40003b5d98aa268fdd44 info msg 357095: bytes 755 from
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
qp 28748 uid 16
@40003b5d98aa26ac044c starting delivery 826368: msg 357095 to local
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
@40003b5d98aa26accb84 status: local 1/10 remote 8/20
@40003b5d98aa2abf4a6c delivery 826368: failure:
Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name._(#5.1.1)/

 What does ls -lsa /var/qmail/alias say?

total 100
   4 drwxr-sr-x   2 aliasqmail4096 Jul 19 13:34 .
   4 drwxr-xr-x  10 root qmail4096 Jul  5 20:59 ..
   4 -rw-r--r--   1 root qmail   8 May 18 06:03
.qmail-postmaster

   4 -rw-r--r--   1 root qmail   8 May 18 06:03 .qmail-root

(I shortened this cause it was long ^^;)


 What does id alias give?

uid=19(alias) gid=502(nofiles) groups=502(nofiles)


 What does grep alias /etc/passwd give?

alias:x:19:502::/home/alias:/bin/bash

Opps Is that the problem?



 -Johan
 --
 Johan Almqvist
 http://www.almqvist.net/johan/qmail/




Part 1.2Type: application/pgp-signature






Re: several /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd and bin/qmail-queue

2001-07-24 Thread alexus

bash-2.05$ ls -al /var/qmail/doc/INTERNALS
ls: /var/qmail/doc/INTERNALS: No such file or directory
bash-2.05$ 

- Original Message - 
From: Greg White [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 10:23 PM
Subject: Re: several /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd and bin/qmail-queue


 On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 09:58:04PM -0400, alexus wrote:
  i was checking something and i founds this
  
  my mail server seems to have tons of 
  /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd and bin/qmail-queue
  
  running at the same time.. about 30 of them
  
 
 The process actually listening on port 25 forks a qmail-smtpd for every
 incoming conneciton. qmail-queue is then run to place the mail safely in
 the queue.
 
  any ideas why?
 
 Read /var/qmail/doc/INTERNALS.
  
  nothin intersting in maillog
  
 
 I find that hard to believe. At the moment you see that many
 qmail-queues hanging around, qmail-smtpd's logs should read something
 like so, if logged through tcpserver:
 
 @40003b5cd7620a221bcc tcpserver: status: 30/xx
 
 where xx is either 40 or whatever is specified in the 'run' file for
 qmail-smtpd. ISTR that inetd does some sort of logging of how many
 processes it has opened, but it's been so long since I used inetd for
 anything that I've forgotten.
 
 -- 
 Greg White
 




Re: fastforward setup

2001-07-24 Thread Mike Wright

Hi all,

Thanks to a recent thread between David Gartner and Johan
Almqvist (re: Having problems with postmaster...) I was able to

spot my error. All of the users/groups had been created but the

home directory for user alias was /home/alias which is wrong!
Changed the home dir to /var/qmail/alias and everything works
like a charm.

Mike Wright wrote:

 Hi all,

 I have two qmail setups. Their qmail/control directories are
 identical except for their individual hostnames. Their
 qmail/alias directories are identical. The only difference
 that I can find is that one is on RedHat6.1 and the other is
 on RedHat7.1.The goal is to have a forwarder with no local
 deliveries i.e. everything is a virtualdomain and everything
 is routed according to etc/aliases.cdb.

 The RH61 qmail works and forwards according to the rules in
 aliases.cdb but the RH7.1 qmail doesn't.

 The log shows that mail is being routed correctly up to a
 point. i.e through qmail-inject, qmail-queue and qmail-send
 but appears to fail within qmail-local.

 starting delivery 5: msg 112266 to local
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 status local 1/10 remote 0/20
 delivery 5: failure:
 Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name._(#5.1.1)
 status local 0/10 remote 0/20
 bounce msg 112266 qp 5607

 Another note: the RedHat6.1 setup was done many, many months
 ago. The RedHat7.1 setup is brand new. I've been trying to
 figure this out for 5 days. I can only guess that I've
 skipped a step somewhere but have been staring at the docs
 for so long that I couldn't see it if it were on my nose:(

 Any help or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

 Thanks,
 Mike Wright




Re: Having problems with postmaster....

2001-07-24 Thread Greg White

On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 12:50:20PM -0400, David Gartner wrote:
 alias:x:19:502::/home/alias:/bin/bash
 
 Opps Is that the problem?
 

Yep:

alias:*:81:81::/var/qmail/alias:/nonexistent

ls -lad /var/qmail/alias:

drwxr-sr-x   2 aliasqmail 512 May 15 08:53 /var/qmail/alias


-- 
Greg White



Re: several /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd and bin/qmail-queue

2001-07-24 Thread Greg White

On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 01:23:13PM -0400, alexus wrote:
 bash-2.05$ ls -al /var/qmail/doc/INTERNALS
 ls: /var/qmail/doc/INTERNALS: No such file or directory
 bash-2.05$ 
 

Apologies. Installing those files in /var/qmail/doc is a port-ism from
FreeBSD. It's in the source tree only in a default install.

GW

-- 
Greg White



Re: scan-4-virus NAI not stopping SirCam

2001-07-24 Thread Daniel Duclos

On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Ing. Ruben Olague wrote:


 I found that the following headers are always present in mails from
 SirCam SMTP, you can use filters.


http://www.antivirus.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=TROJ_SIRCAM.A

Daniel Lobato Duclos - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.cybershark.net
---
Stand for something, or you will fall for nothing.
(http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/pragmatic.html)




Re: Which RBL replacement?

2001-07-24 Thread Chin Fang

I just checked out http://www.mail-abuse.org/rbl, but didn't see any
mentioning of charges to the direct mode of using RBL.  Would
appreciate it if anyone could post a pointer that leads to more
detailed announcement of this new policy.

Regards,

Chin Fang
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 03:29:15PM +0200, Paulo Jan wrote:
  Hi all:
  
  Starting Jul 31 RBL will start charging for using their services. Which
  of the free RBL replacement do people recommend? I have read so far
  about ORBL and ORBS...
 



Help with procmail...

2001-07-24 Thread Xavier Pegenaute



Helo..,

we are migrating a sendmail+procmail to 
qmail+procmail, and just only for probes we put "|prelines procmail" in 
.qmail-default, and when procmail was run over sendmail, the line for exec 
procmail is:

procmail -Y -m $h $f $u
Now, how we can put $h (host), $f (From ), $u 
(dest) ..??


PD: We don't have system users, all users goes 
throught procmail.
Thanks.


Re: Which RBL replacement?

2001-07-24 Thread Peter van Dijk

On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 11:45:57AM -0700, Chin Fang wrote:
 I just checked out http://www.mail-abuse.org/rbl, but didn't see any
 mentioning of charges to the direct mode of using RBL.  Would
 appreciate it if anyone could post a pointer that leads to more
 detailed announcement of this new policy.

http://www.mail-abuse.org/subscription.html

Greetz, Peter
-- 
Against Free Sex!   http://www.dataloss.nl/Megahard_en.html



Can anyone recommend a cheap virus scanner that works with qmail?

2001-07-24 Thread roger

I'm running a qmail box that services email for myself and a few
others, and I'd like to implement a virus scanning solution on it.

I'm looking for a cheap (it's only a couple of users -- I don't fancy
spending $350/yr on it) virus scanner that works with one of the
scanning packages for qmail -- currently I have qmail-scanner
installed.

Recommendations?

Cheers,
Roger.




Re: mailsize limit

2001-07-24 Thread Constantine Koulis

Dear Sir.
I am very interested to do what u said in ur email about limiting the 
mailbox size.please give me an example how to do it cause i do use the
tcp.smtp file.
Sincerely

Tks  Best Regards
Koulis Constantine.
Bucharest Romania
Business Phone :+4-093979131


From: Magnus Bodin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Frank Moeller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mailsize limit
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 17:32:39 +0200

On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 05:04:25PM +0200, Frank Moeller wrote:
  Hi all.
 
  I'd like to do some mailsize limiting with qmail and I'm wondering
  if there's a simple way to do this:
 
  - external to local should be limited to i.e. 5Mb
  - local to local mail should be unlimited
 
  What I'm looking for is some kind of domain dependend maximum mail size
  limiting...

You can set the environment variable DATABYTES
in your tcp.smtp-file (that I assume you use and compile to tcp.smtp.cdb,
and use with tcpserver according to life with qmail).

Just like you set RELAYCLIENT=, you can set DATABYTES there to different
values.

Set DATABYTES TO 0 if you don't want any limit.
set it to something else to limit.

/magnus

--
Unfortunately, those people who have nothing better to do than post on the
  Internet all day long are rarely the ones who have the most insights.
- Jakob Nielsen, 
August 1997


_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




Re: How to piss people off easily (Was: How to create dynamic users for IMAP Email services) Reply-To: robin@socha.net

2001-07-24 Thread Stephen Bosch

Kirti S. Bajwa wrote:
 
 Sorry Business manners have nothing to do whether you pay or not.

Right -- it's simple professionalism. It doesn't take much to be polite.

You don't have to reply if you don't want to.

-Stephen-



Problem with Qmail Queueing

2001-07-24 Thread Edward McLain








Ive got a quick problem and I hope that someone can
help me with this.  In the past month my
company has switched from using Sendmail with linuxconf and virtualpop3 to using qmail
with vpoppasswd. 
Everything converted great and I have a couple of bash scripts and php scripts that make this conversion easy and fast if
anyone is interested.  The problem I am
having is in the queuing.  I cannot seem
to get qmail-send to run more than 20 qmail-remotes at any one time.  I have changed /var/qmail/control/concurrencyremote
to 90 and it still stops at 20.  Ive
searched through the archives and done as much research as possible, but still
cant find anyway around this.  I
also set /var/qmail/control/queuelifetime to 345600,
which should reflect about 4 days, however mail is
still sticking around in the queue for a week. 
Anyone have any suggestions or otherwise on this? 



Thanks,



Ed McLain

High Speed Solutions

[EMAIL PROTECTED]








RE: Problem with Qmail Queueing

2001-07-24 Thread Dahnke, Eric



are 
you using tcpserver or inetd.

  -Original Message-From: Edward McLain 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 3:39 
  PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Problem with Qmail 
  Queueing
  
  Ive got a quick problem and I 
  hope that someone can help me with this. 
  In the past month my company has switched from using Sendmail with linuxconf and 
  virtualpop3 to using qmail with vpoppasswd. 
  Everything converted great and I have a couple of bash scripts and 
  php scripts that make this conversion easy and fast 
  if anyone is interested. The 
  problem I am having is in the queuing. 
  I cannot seem to get qmail-send to run more 
  than 20 qmail-remotes at any one time. I have changed /var/qmail/control/concurrencyremote to 90 and it still 
  stops at 20. Ive searched 
  through the archives and done as much research as possible, but still cant 
  find anyway around this. I also 
  set /var/qmail/control/queuelifetime to 345600, 
  which should reflect about 4 days, however mail is 
  still sticking around in the queue for a week. Anyone have any suggestions or 
  otherwise on this? 
  
  Thanks,
  
  Ed 
  McLain
  High Speed 
  Solutions
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Problem with Qmail Queueing

2001-07-24 Thread Edward McLain









tcpserver



-Original Message-
From: Dahnke, Eric
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 3:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Problem with Qmail
Queueing





are you using tcpserver
or inetd.





-Original Message-
From: Edward McLain
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 3:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Problem with Qmail
Queueing

Ive got a quick problem and I
hope that someone can help me with this. 
In the past month my company has switched from using Sendmail with
linuxconf and virtualpop3 to using qmail with vpoppasswd.  Everything converted great and I have a
couple of bash scripts and php scripts that make this conversion easy and fast
if anyone is interested.  The problem I
am having is in the queuing.  I cannot
seem to get qmail-send to run more than 20 qmail-remotes at any one time.  I have changed
/var/qmail/control/concurrencyremote to 90 and it still stops at 20.  Ive searched through the archives and
done as much research as possible, but still cant find anyway around
this.  I also set
/var/qmail/control/queuelifetime to 345600, which should reflect about 4 days,
however mail is still sticking around in the queue for a week.  Anyone have any suggestions or otherwise on
this? 



Thanks,



Ed McLain

High Speed Solutions

[EMAIL PROTECTED]










RE: Problem with Qmail Queueing

2001-07-24 Thread Dahnke, Eric




From FAQ: How do I run qmail-smtpd under 
tcpserver? inetd is barfing at high loads, 
cutting off service for ten-minute stretches. I'd also like better connection 
logging. 
Answer: Install ucspi-tcp. Remove the smtp line from 
/etc/inetd.conf, and put the two lines  tcpserver -v -u 7770 -g 2108 0 smtp /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd \
 21 | /var/qmail/bin/splogger smtpd 3 
into your system boot scripts; replace 7770 with your 
qmaild uid, and replace 2108 with your nofiles gid. Don't forget the . The 
change will take effect at your next reboot. 
By default, tcpserver allows at most 40 simultaneous qmail-smtpd processes. 
To raise this limit to 400, use tcpserver -c 400. 


Cheers - Eric

-Original Message-From: Edward 
McLain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 3:57 
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: Problem with Qmail 
Queueing

  
  tcpserver
  
  -Original 
  Message-From: Dahnke, 
  Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 
  2001 3:57 
  PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: Problem with Qmail 
  Queueing
  
  
  are you 
  using tcpserver or inetd.
  
-Original 
Message-From: Edward 
McLain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 
2001 3:39 
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Problem with Qmail 
Queueing
Ive got a quick problem and I 
hope that someone can help me with this. In the past month my company has 
switched from using Sendmail with linuxconf and virtualpop3 to using qmail 
with vpoppasswd. Everything 
converted great and I have a couple of bash scripts and php scripts that 
make this conversion easy and fast if anyone is interested. The problem I am having is in the 
queuing. I cannot seem to get 
qmail-send to run more than 20 qmail-remotes at any one time. I have changed 
/var/qmail/control/concurrencyremote to 90 and it still stops at 20. Ive searched through the archives 
and done as much research as possible, but still cant find anyway around 
this. I also set 
/var/qmail/control/queuelifetime to 345600, which should reflect about 4 
days, however mail is still sticking around in the queue for a week. Anyone have any suggestions or 
otherwise on this? 

Thanks,

Ed 
McLain
High Speed 
Solutions
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Problem with Qmail Queueing

2001-07-24 Thread Jamin A. Brown

It sounds to me like you didn't stop and restart the qmail-send daemon
after making those changes. Read the man page on qmail-send.

This little snippet is probably the most helpful:

CONTROL FILES
   WARNING:  qmail-send  reads its control files only when it
   starts.  If you change the control files,  you  must  stop
   and restart qmail-send.  Exception: If qmail-send receives
   a HUP signal, it will reread locals and virtualdomains.

Jamin

On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Edward McLain wrote:

 I’ve got a quick problem and I hope that someone can help me with this.
 In the past month my company has switched from using Sendmail with
 linuxconf and virtualpop3 to using qmail with vpoppasswd.  Everything
 converted great and I have a couple of bash scripts and php scripts that
 make this conversion easy and fast if anyone is interested.  The problem
 I am having is in the queuing.  I cannot seem to get qmail-send to run
 more than 20 qmail-remotes at any one time.  I have changed
 /var/qmail/control/concurrencyremote to 90 and it still stops at 20.
 I’ve searched through the archives and done as much research as
 possible, but still can’t find anyway around this.  I also set
 /var/qmail/control/queuelifetime to 345600, which should reflect about 4
 days, however mail is still sticking around in the queue for a week.
 Anyone have any suggestions or otherwise on this?

 Thanks,

 Ed McLain
 High Speed Solutions
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
Jamin A. Brown  Systems Operations Supervisor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   * Great Works Internet *   207.286.8686 x142
RSA 1024 PGP Key:http://home.gwi.net/~jamin/pgp/jamin.asc




Is Qmail MAPI Compliant?

2001-07-24 Thread Ramsey, Mike








Is qmail mapi compliant?








RE: Problem with Qmail Queueing

2001-07-24 Thread Edward McLain

From the suggestions I have gotten so far this is where I am and what I
have done already to alleviate this problem.

Changed /var/qmail/rc to read as follows:
#!/bin/sh
QMAILDUID=`id -u qmaild`
NOFILESGID=`id -g qmaild`
MAXSMTPD=`cat /var/qmail/control/concurrencyincoming`
exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 200 \
   /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -R -l 0 -x
/var/vpopmail/etc//tcp.smtp.cdb -c $MAXSMTPD \
-u $QMAILDUID -g $NOFILESGID 0 smtp
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd  21
Changed /var/qmail/control/concurrencyincoming to read as follows:
90
Changed /var/qmail/control/concurrencyremote to read as follows:
90
Changed /var/qmail/control/queuelifetime to read as follows:
345600

After changing any of the files I run:
qmailctl restart
Or
qmailctl stop then qmailctl start
I set up the system originally based on the Life with QMail way to do
it so if there any problems with doing this please let me know.

Thanks,

Ed McLain


-Original Message-
From: Jamin A. Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 4:40 PM
To: Edward McLain
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Problem with Qmail Queueing

It sounds to me like you didn't stop and restart the qmail-send daemon
after making those changes. Read the man page on qmail-send.

This little snippet is probably the most helpful:

CONTROL FILES
   WARNING:  qmail-send  reads its control files only when it
   starts.  If you change the control files,  you  must  stop
   and restart qmail-send.  Exception: If qmail-send receives
   a HUP signal, it will reread locals and virtualdomains.

Jamin

On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Edward McLain wrote:

 I’ve got a quick problem and I hope that someone can help me with
this.
 In the past month my company has switched from using Sendmail with
 linuxconf and virtualpop3 to using qmail with vpoppasswd.  Everything
 converted great and I have a couple of bash scripts and php scripts
that
 make this conversion easy and fast if anyone is interested.  The
problem
 I am having is in the queuing.  I cannot seem to get qmail-send to run
 more than 20 qmail-remotes at any one time.  I have changed
 /var/qmail/control/concurrencyremote to 90 and it still stops at 20.
 I’ve searched through the archives and done as much research as
 possible, but still can’t find anyway around this.  I also set
 /var/qmail/control/queuelifetime to 345600, which should reflect about
4
 days, however mail is still sticking around in the queue for a week.
 Anyone have any suggestions or otherwise on this?

 Thanks,

 Ed McLain
 High Speed Solutions
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
Jamin A. Brown  Systems Operations Supervisor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   * Great Works Internet *   207.286.8686 x142
RSA 1024 PGP Key:http://home.gwi.net/~jamin/pgp/jamin.asc





RE: Problem with Qmail Queueing

2001-07-24 Thread Dahnke, Eric


I recall this problem, and if I remember correctly you would have to tell
qmail to up the concurrency remote (which you've done ... and HUP
qmail-send) AND tell inetd or tcpserver to up their limit's as well (that is
in two different places). The 20 qmail-sends is puzzling, because for
tcpserver which you claim to be using the default is 40 processes. But then
maybe you didn't HUP qmail so it never recognized the change to 90. If you
did and you're still seeing only 20 qmail-send processes you might be using
inetd for smtp traffic. you can use tcpserver for pop and inetd and
visa-versa. check your /etc/inetd.conf file.

- Eric

The earth is our mother not the United States' supermarket. Stop
uber-commercialism.


-Original Message-
From: Jamin A. Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 5:40 PM
To: Edward McLain
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Problem with Qmail Queueing


This message uses a character set that is not supported by the Internet
Service.  To view the original message content,  open the attached message.
If the text doesn't display correctly, save the attachment to disk, and then
open it using a viewer that can display the original character set. 



Re: Is Qmail MAPI Compliant?

2001-07-24 Thread Peter van Dijk

On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 02:48:29PM -0700, Ramsey, Mike wrote:
 Is qmail mapi compliant?

Probably not, since MAPI is a M$-standard as far as I know.

However, you have provided no details of what you want or what you are
trying to accomplish. Perhaps MAPI is not even what you need?

Greetz, Peter
-- 
Against Free Sex!   http://www.dataloss.nl/Megahard_en.html



Re: Problem with Qmail Queueing

2001-07-24 Thread John White

On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 05:10:27PM -0400, Dahnke, Eric wrote:
 tcpserver_smtpdFrom FAQ: How do I run qmail-smtpd under tcpserver? inetd is
 barfing at high loads, cutting off service for ten-minute stretches. I'd
 also like better connection logging. 

Unfortunately, this FAQ doesn't have anything to do with the stated
problem of remoteconcurrency.

You don't have to touch your qmail-smtpd configuration at all.

You do need to stop and restart qmail-send.

John White



RE: Is Qmail MAPI Compliant?

2001-07-24 Thread Ramsey, Mike

Sorry I was in a rush.. :) I'm testing using McAfee Netshield NT sending an
alert message to qmail then qmail forwarding to exchange.. the Mapi
compliancy was just a question I had.. no real big concern there.. I just
wanna get qmail forwarding alerts to exchange. 

-Original Message-
From: Peter van Dijk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 5:05 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: Is Qmail MAPI Compliant?

On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 02:48:29PM -0700, Ramsey, Mike wrote:
 Is qmail mapi compliant?

Probably not, since MAPI is a M$-standard as far as I know.

However, you have provided no details of what you want or what you are
trying to accomplish. Perhaps MAPI is not even what you need?

Greetz, Peter
-- 
Against Free Sex!   http://www.dataloss.nl/Megahard_en.html



RE: Problem with Qmail Queueing

2001-07-24 Thread Edward McLain

Tried that one.. What I did was:
/usr/local/bin/svc -d /service/qmail-send
qmail-send still didn't exit or anything so I did:
killall -TERM qmail-send
Now there were 20 qmail-remote's running so I figured that it was
waiting on them.  Since they have been sitting there for about 3 hours
now I did:
Killall -HUP qmail-remote
This seemed to clear everything out.  I then did:
/usr/local/bin/svc -u /service/qmail-send
then
killall -ALRM qmail-send
This started the queuing back but it still only handle 20 and I have
like 40 in the queue.

Hope this helps,

Ed McLain

-Original Message-
From: John White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 5:26 PM
To: Edward McLain
Subject: Re: Problem with Qmail Queueing

On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 03:45:25PM -0500, Edward McLain wrote:
 I set up the system originally based on the Life with QMail way to
do
 it so if there any problems with doing this please let me know.
 
No, that's a pretty good starting point.

I think all you needed to do was give qmail-send a kill -HUP.

John 




RE: Problem with Qmail Queueing

2001-07-24 Thread Kourosh Ghassemieh


If you installed via LWQ shouldn't the correct way to start/stop be

 qmail restart
 or
 qmail stop then qmail start

rather than qmailctl?

That's how I do mine.  After you stop qmail do a ps aux (no quotes)
and see if qmail is still running.  If it is, then it didn't stop and it 
didn't reread
the control files.

At 03:45 PM 7/24/2001 -0500, you wrote:
 From the suggestions I have gotten so far this is where I am and what I
have done already to alleviate this problem.

Changed /var/qmail/rc to read as follows:
 #!/bin/sh
 QMAILDUID=`id -u qmaild`
 NOFILESGID=`id -g qmaild`
 MAXSMTPD=`cat /var/qmail/control/concurrencyincoming`
 exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 200 \
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -R -l 0 -x
/var/vpopmail/etc//tcp.smtp.cdb -c $MAXSMTPD \
 -u $QMAILDUID -g $NOFILESGID 0 smtp
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd  21
Changed /var/qmail/control/concurrencyincoming to read as follows:
 90
Changed /var/qmail/control/concurrencyremote to read as follows:
 90
Changed /var/qmail/control/queuelifetime to read as follows:
 345600

After changing any of the files I run:
 qmailctl restart
 Or
 qmailctl stop then qmailctl start
I set up the system originally based on the Life with QMail way to do
it so if there any problems with doing this please let me know.

Thanks,

Ed McLain


-Original Message-
From: Jamin A. Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 4:40 PM
To: Edward McLain
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Problem with Qmail Queueing

It sounds to me like you didn't stop and restart the qmail-send daemon
after making those changes. Read the man page on qmail-send.

This little snippet is probably the most helpful:

CONTROL FILES
WARNING:  qmail-send  reads its control files only when it
starts.  If you change the control files,  you  must  stop
and restart qmail-send.  Exception: If qmail-send receives
a HUP signal, it will reread locals and virtualdomains.

Jamin

On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Edward McLain wrote:

  I've got a quick problem and I hope that someone can help me with
this.
  In the past month my company has switched from using Sendmail with
  linuxconf and virtualpop3 to using qmail with vpoppasswd.  Everything
  converted great and I have a couple of bash scripts and php scripts
that
  make this conversion easy and fast if anyone is interested.  The
problem
  I am having is in the queuing.  I cannot seem to get qmail-send to run
  more than 20 qmail-remotes at any one time.  I have changed
  /var/qmail/control/concurrencyremote to 90 and it still stops at 20.
  I've searched through the archives and done as much research as
  possible, but still can't find anyway around this.  I also set
  /var/qmail/control/queuelifetime to 345600, which should reflect about
4
  days, however mail is still sticking around in the queue for a week.
  Anyone have any suggestions or otherwise on this?
 
  Thanks,
 
  Ed McLain
  High Speed Solutions
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


-
Jamin A. Brown  Systems Operations Supervisor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   * Great Works Internet *   207.286.8686 x142
RSA 1024 PGP Key:http://home.gwi.net/~jamin/pgp/jamin.asc

-

Kourosh Ghassemieh
MindWare Information Systems  Technologies
9255 Sunset Blvd, Penthouse
West Hollywood CA 90069
(310) 729-1784
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Networking Solutions for Your Business





Re: QSBMF -

2001-07-24 Thread John P

   Pretty much the whole trick is to go into qmail-send.c, around line
 708 (search for Hi), and just change the message that is output.  As
 with any source change, you'll want to test it first, and make sure
 the message is reasonably formatted, has all important information,
 and the proper headers and envelope.

I've read qsbmf.txt, but I am still confused a little about it. Is it some
method of ensuring qmail always knows when a message has bounced? Or was it
designed so that in the future, MUAs might know that a message has bounced
and mark it (as Outlook+Exchange does)?

I understand DJB's reasons for doing it his way (avoiding bandwidth-wasting
deferral reports a la sendmail, for example, and outputting useful info to
the user) - essentially what I want to know is, if changing as outlined
above works OK, is this fundamentally problematic for qmail or is it just
breaking DJB's spec?

Regards,
John







RE: Problem with Qmail Queueing

2001-07-24 Thread Dahnke, Eric


Wrong. Look at the last line of my post. By default, tcpserver allows at
most 40 simultaneous qmail-smtpd processes. To raise this limit to 400, use
tcpserver -c 400. 



-Original Message-
From: John White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 6:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Problem with Qmail Queueing


On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 05:10:27PM -0400, Dahnke, Eric wrote:
 tcpserver_smtpdFrom FAQ: How do I run qmail-smtpd under tcpserver? inetd
is
 barfing at high loads, cutting off service for ten-minute stretches. I'd
 also like better connection logging. 

Unfortunately, this FAQ doesn't have anything to do with the stated
problem of remoteconcurrency.

You don't have to touch your qmail-smtpd configuration at all.

You do need to stop and restart qmail-send.

John White



Re: QSBMF -

2001-07-24 Thread Peter van Dijk

On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 11:41:29PM +0100, John P wrote:
Pretty much the whole trick is to go into qmail-send.c, around line
  708 (search for Hi), and just change the message that is output.  As
  with any source change, you'll want to test it first, and make sure
  the message is reasonably formatted, has all important information,
  and the proper headers and envelope.
 
 I've read qsbmf.txt, but I am still confused a little about it. Is it some
 method of ensuring qmail always knows when a message has bounced? Or was it
 designed so that in the future, MUAs might know that a message has bounced
 and mark it (as Outlook+Exchange does)?

QSMBF exist so that compliant applications (like ezmlm) can find out
exactly what bounced and what didn't.

 I understand DJB's reasons for doing it his way (avoiding bandwidth-wasting
 deferral reports a la sendmail, for example, and outputting useful info to
 the user) - essentially what I want to know is, if changing as outlined
 above works OK, is this fundamentally problematic for qmail or is it just
 breaking DJB's spec?

It is fundamentally problematic for ezmlm.

Greetz, Peter
-- 
Against Free Sex!   http://www.dataloss.nl/Megahard_en.html



Re: Problem with Qmail Queueing

2001-07-24 Thread John White

On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 06:39:00PM -0400, Dahnke, Eric wrote:
 
 Wrong. Look at the last line of my post. By default, tcpserver allows at
 most 40 simultaneous qmail-smtpd processes. To raise this limit to 400, use
 tcpserver -c 400. 
 
I read that.

That doesn't have anything to do with the number of concurrent remote
deliveries that qmail will do.

John White 



RE: Problem with Qmail Queueing

2001-07-24 Thread Dahnke, Eric


Sorry for my abrupt response previously. I recognize you as a long time
member of the list, and appreciated your help when I was first getting into
qmail. But on a server level you do need to do this no? That is, qmail can
be set to do 300 concurrent deliveries but in the tcp layer either inetd or
tcpserver needs to be upped from their default values as well.




-Original Message-
From: John White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 6:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Problem with Qmail Queueing


On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 06:39:00PM -0400, Dahnke, Eric wrote:
 
 Wrong. Look at the last line of my post. By default, tcpserver allows at
 most 40 simultaneous qmail-smtpd processes. To raise this limit to 400,
use
 tcpserver -c 400. 
 
I read that.

That doesn't have anything to do with the number of concurrent remote
deliveries that qmail will do.

John White 



Re: Problem with Qmail Queueing

2001-07-24 Thread John White

On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 08:09:01PM -0400, Dahnke, Eric wrote:
 
 Sorry for my abrupt response previously. I recognize you as a long time
 member of the list, and appreciated your help when I was first getting into
 qmail. But on a server level you do need to do this no? That is, qmail can
 be set to do 300 concurrent deliveries but in the tcp layer either inetd or
 tcpserver needs to be upped from their default values as well.
 
Nope. :-)  

Adjusting qmail-smtpd's tcpserver settings can allow you to handle more
-incoming- smtp traffic, but doesn't have anything to do with -outgoing-
smtp traffic.

John White 



Re: Problem with Qmail Queueing

2001-07-24 Thread MarkD

On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 08:09:01PM -0400, Dahnke, Eric allegedly wrote:
 
 Sorry for my abrupt response previously. I recognize you as a long time
 member of the list, and appreciated your help when I was first getting into
 qmail. But on a server level you do need to do this no? That is, qmail can
 be set to do 300 concurrent deliveries but in the tcp layer either inetd or
 tcpserver needs to be upped from their default values as well.

Yes. But there are two different concurrency levels regarding remote
mail. One controls how many *inbound* connections will be accepted
concurrently and that is controlled by the tcpserver -c value.  The
other controls how many *outbound* deliveries will be attempted
concurrently and that is controlled by control/concurrencyremote.

You are referring to the former while John is referring to the
latter.

Yes, you do need to tune both of these and yes they are both in the
tcp layer as you put it, but they are definitely different beasts
that should be treated entirely separately.


Regards.


 
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: John White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 6:59 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Problem with Qmail Queueing
 
 
 On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 06:39:00PM -0400, Dahnke, Eric wrote:
  
  Wrong. Look at the last line of my post. By default, tcpserver allows at
  most 40 simultaneous qmail-smtpd processes. To raise this limit to 400,
 use
  tcpserver -c 400. 
  
 I read that.
 
 That doesn't have anything to do with the number of concurrent remote
 deliveries that qmail will do.
 
 John White 



Re: Problem with Qmail Queueing

2001-07-24 Thread Ahmad Ridha

Kourosh Ghassemieh writes: 

 
 If you installed via LWQ shouldn't the correct way to start/stop be 
 
 qmail restart
 or
 qmail stop then qmail start 
 
 rather than qmailctl? 
 

The latest LWQ (June 13, 2001) contains few changes including change of the 
script name to qmailctl. 

Regards, 

Ahmad Ridha 



Re: Help with procmail...

2001-07-24 Thread Adrian Ho

On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 08:55:03PM +0200, Xavier Pegenaute wrote:
 Now, how we can put $h (host), $f (From ), $u (dest) ..??

man qmail-command.  You'll probably have to write a wrapper script
to substitute the appropriate environment variables in your procmail
command line, but that shouldn't be too difficult.  8-)

-- 
Adrian HoTinker, Drifter, Fixer, Bum   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ListArchive: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=qmail
Useful URLs: http://cr.yp.to/qmail.html http://www.qmail.org
 http://www.lifewithqmail.org/ http://qmail.faqts.com/