Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: qtp-newmodel fails on FUSE
W dniu 28.10.2009 06:53, Maxwell Smart pisze: Nah, 32bit here. For reference. * rpm -qa | grep kernel* kernel-2.6.18-128.7.1.el5 ne with a x86_64 toaster actually running a newer kernel? Please chime in. [...] I have CentOS 5.4 and there is no problem to mount sandbox: 8-- [r...@srv ~]# qtp-mount-sandbox qtp-mount-sandbox v0.3.3 qtp-mount-sandbox - updating dependencies ... Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * addons: ftp.ps.pl * base: ftp.ps.pl * centosplus: ftp.ps.pl * extras: ftp.ps.pl * rpmforge: ftp-stud.fht-esslingen.de * updates: ftp.ps.pl Setting up Update Process No Packages marked for Update qtp-mount-sandbox: sandbox mounted successfully [r...@srv ~]# qtp-umount-sandbox qtp-umount-sandbox v0.3.2 qtp-umount-sandbox: sandbox umounted successfully [r...@srv ~]# cat /etc/issue CentOS release 5.4 (Final) Kernel \r on an \m [r...@srv ~]# uname -a Linux srv.witd.kielce.pl 2.6.18-164.2.1.el5.plus #1 SMP Fri Oct 9 12:27:45 EDT 2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux 8-- EOT Get http://www.qmailtoaster.com/distro/centos/cnt50/cnt50-install-script.sh, read it and check did you install all needed packages. -- Pozdrawiam / Regards, Aleksander Podsiadły mail: a...@westside.kielce.pl jid: a...@jabber.westside.kielce.pl ICQ: 201121279 gg: 9150578 - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] qmailtoaster-plus-0.3.1-1.4.14 released
W dniu 28.10.2009 06:13, Eric Shubert pisze: I meant to mention that the FUSE unionfs hasn't been tested on x86_64. I'm really sorry to have omitted that. I hope we can get this working on x86_64 hosts in short order. Works 4 me. :) -- Pozdrawiam / Regards, Aleksander Podsiadły mail: a...@westside.kielce.pl jid: a...@jabber.westside.kielce.pl ICQ: 201121279 gg: 9150578 - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: qtp-newmodel fails on FUSE
Eric Shubert wrote: Wait a sec. I just noticed that this is x86_64. Doh! The FUSE unionfs hasn't been tested on that arch yet. That explains why fuse doesn't necessarily work. Ben and CJ, are your problem toasters 64-bit as well?? Is anyone with a x86_64 toaster actually running a newer kernel? Please chime in. Regardless of the architecture, Grub should load the newer kernel, right ? If someone can tell me how to get that fixed, I can test the toast-ability of x86_64 ;-) - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: using barracudacentral RBL
Eric Shubert wrote: Jake Vickers wrote: senthil vel wrote: Dear List, I am interested to use the barracuda RBL in my qmailtoaster server, I have registered to www.barracudacentral.org http://www.barracudacentral.org. Is it enough to append -r b.barracudacentral.org http://b.barracudacentral.org in my /var/qmail/control/blacklists file? Yes it is. I use it on several of my servers. You will occasionally get false positives, so beware. I see one FP every 3 months or so. Just a reminder for spamdyke users, that the blacklists file isn't used with spamdyke. Use your /etc/spamdyke/spamdyke.conf file instead. ;) thank for hint, but is it really worthed to add another Blacklist on my system? because I do not want legit email blocked (this is worse than spam that can get thru) I am already using spamdyke, spamhaus spamcop, spamassassin, SaneSecurity unofficial clamav db + a Watchguard Firewall w/ antispam feature activated and number of spam received on my box is very minimal (one a day?) ps: when start using spamdyke (July) there are no longer SMTP Denied value indicator on qmailmrtg (section Smtp Allow/Deny), is it normal inline: smtpad-yearly.png- Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: qtp-newmodel fails on FUSE
W dniu 28.10.2009 08:01, Wim Godden pisze: Regardless of the architecture, Grub should load the newer kernel, right ? If someone can tell me how to get that fixed, I can test the toast-ability of x86_64 ;-) GRUB loads what you want to load, default kernel shown in line: default= automatically after time in seconds: timeout= It can be MS Windows too. -- Pozdrawiam / Regards, Aleksander Podsiadły mail: a...@westside.kielce.pl jid: a...@jabber.westside.kielce.pl ICQ: 201121279 gg: 9150578 - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: qtp-newmodel fails on FUSE
Eric Shubert wrote: Wait a sec. I just noticed that this is x86_64. Doh! The FUSE unionfs hasn't been tested on that arch yet. That explains why fuse doesn't necessarily work. Ben and CJ, are your problem toasters 64-bit as well?? Is anyone with a x86_64 toaster actually running a newer kernel? Please chime in. Maybe this might shed a light on things : My /boot/grub/device.map contains : # this device map was generated by anaconda (hd0) /dev/mapper/ddf1_Main but /dev/mapper/ddf1_Main is not mounted. Instead /dev/sda1 is mounted. So grub might not install itself because of this ? - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
[qmailtoaster] Re: qtp-newmodel fails on FUSE
Wim Godden wrote: Eric Shubert wrote: Wait a sec. I just noticed that this is x86_64. Doh! The FUSE unionfs hasn't been tested on that arch yet. That explains why fuse doesn't necessarily work. Ben and CJ, are your problem toasters 64-bit as well?? Is anyone with a x86_64 toaster actually running a newer kernel? Please chime in. Maybe this might shed a light on things : My /boot/grub/device.map contains : # this device map was generated by anaconda (hd0) /dev/mapper/ddf1_Main but /dev/mapper/ddf1_Main is not mounted. Instead /dev/sda1 is mounted. So grub might not install itself because of this ? My /boot/grub/device.map contains: # this device map was generated by anaconda (hd0) /dev/sda See http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/html_node/Device-map.html I would try commenting out the existing line, and adding the line as in the file I have. I've no idea what ddf1_Main is. It wouldn't need to be mounted, as grub does its thing well before mounting takes place. Just out of curiosity, what does: # ls -l /dev/mapper/ddf1_Main show you? -- -Eric 'shubes' - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
[qmailtoaster] Re: using barracudacentral RBL
PakOgah wrote: Eric Shubert wrote: Jake Vickers wrote: senthil vel wrote: Dear List, I am interested to use the barracuda RBL in my qmailtoaster server, I have registered to www.barracudacentral.org http://www.barracudacentral.org. Is it enough to append -r b.barracudacentral.org http://b.barracudacentral.org in my /var/qmail/control/blacklists file? Yes it is. I use it on several of my servers. You will occasionally get false positives, so beware. I see one FP every 3 months or so. Just a reminder for spamdyke users, that the blacklists file isn't used with spamdyke. Use your /etc/spamdyke/spamdyke.conf file instead. ;) thank for hint, but is it really worthed to add another Blacklist on my system? because I do not want legit email blocked (this is worse than spam that can get thru) I am already using spamdyke, spamhaus spamcop, spamassassin, SaneSecurity unofficial clamav db + a Watchguard Firewall w/ antispam feature activated and number of spam received on my box is very minimal (one a day?) I doubt that barracudacentral will buy you much. I also expect that the antispam feature on your Watchguard Firewall isn't catching anything that wouldn't be caught by everything else you have. That's just a hunch though. ps: when start using spamdyke (July) there are no longer SMTP Denied value indicator on qmailmrtg (section Smtp Allow/Deny), is it normal This is a bug. Should be easy to fix. Would someone care to track it down? The log messages with spamdyke are different, so this isn't getting picked up. It'd be interesting to see this, as I expect it would in reality be quite a bit higher with spamdyke. -- -Eric 'shubes' - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
[qmailtoaster] Re: qmailtoaster-plus-0.3.1-1.4.14 released
Aleksander Podsiadly wrote: W dniu 28.10.2009 06:13, Eric Shubert pisze: I meant to mention that the FUSE unionfs hasn't been tested on x86_64. I'm really sorry to have omitted that. I hope we can get this working on x86_64 hosts in short order. Works 4 me. :) Thanks Aleksander. It had me worried a little last night. I put all the packages in place, just didn't have a x86_64 host to test with. Which distro/version(s) are you running on 64? Has anyone run this on Fedora with 64-bit? Just curious. -- -Eric 'shubes' - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: qmailtoaster-plus-0.3.1-1.4.14 released
W dniu 28.10.2009 16:31, Eric Shubert pisze: Thanks Aleksander. It had me worried a little last night. I put all the packages in place, just didn't have a x86_64 host to test with. Which distro/version(s) are you running on 64? Has anyone run this on Fedora with 64-bit? Just curious. Centos Centos 5.4 on ,,Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8200 @ 2.66GHz''. IMHO Fedora has to short serve time to be used on server. -- Pozdrawiam / Regards, Aleksander Podsiadły mail: a...@westside.kielce.pl jid: a...@jabber.westside.kielce.pl ICQ: 201121279 gg: 9150578 - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
[qmailtoaster] how to look in the log
could someone remind me how I might look in the logs to see any and all references to b...@billybob.com here is my situation a user says she is not getting email from ( let us call them ) bi...@billybob.com so i wish to see if billy mail hits my server and is rejected or what not etc. thanks! jS
[qmailtoaster] Re: qmailtoaster-plus-0.3.1-1.4.14 released
Aleksander Podsiadly wrote: W dniu 28.10.2009 16:31, Eric Shubert pisze: Thanks Aleksander. It had me worried a little last night. I put all the packages in place, just didn't have a x86_64 host to test with. Which distro/version(s) are you running on 64? Has anyone run this on Fedora with 64-bit? Just curious. Centos Centos 5.4 on ,,Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8200 @ 2.66GHz''. IMHO Fedora has to short serve time to be used on server. I agree. Fedora on a server is ludicrous. We do have a few folks who like to sit on the bleeding edge though (for whatever reason). I think it's good for QMT (and QTP) to be doable on Fedora since that represents the future of CentOS, and we're thus prepared for new CentOS releases. I wouldn't put Fedora on a production server though. -- -Eric 'shubes' - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
[qmailtoaster] Re: how to look in the log
Jim Shupert wrote: could someone remind me how I might look in the logs to see any and all references to b...@billybob.com here is my situation a user says she is not getting email from ( let us call them ) bi...@billybob.com so i wish to see if billy mail hits my server and is rejected or what not etc. thanks! jS Providing you have QTP installed (and you really should), # qmlog -lc bi...@billybob\.com smtp Cool, eh? -- -Eric 'shubes' - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
[qmailtoaster] problem
Hello list I check my current log in /var/log/qmail/spam and I have this warning @40004ae86dd92209fb4c [19398] warn: bayes: cannot open bayes databases /home/vpopmail/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: lock failed: File exists @40004ae86dd9220a12bc [19398] info: spamd: processing message 20091028161939.13cca1dec...@mail.fxe.net for clamav:89 @40004ae86ddb32d3b60c [19397] info: spamd: connection from mailserver.mxbyrail.com [127.0.0.1] at port 37783 @40004ae86de234b6a2f4 [19398] warn: bayes: cannot open bayes databases /home/vpopmail/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: lock failed: File exists @40004ae86de41bf6032c [19397] warn: bayes: cannot open bayes databases /home/vpopmail/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: lock failed: File exists @40004ae86de428cbd324 [19397] info: spamd: processing message 20091028161907.3d1f11dec...@mail.fxe.net for clamav:89 @40004ae86dec0ddd379c [19397] warn: bayes: cannot open bayes databases /home/vpopmail/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: lock failed: File exists Anybody help me?
Re: [qmailtoaster] problem
On Oct 28, 2009, at 12:15 PM, Noel Rivera (Border Less) wrote: Hello list I check my current log in /var/log/qmail/spam and I have this warning @40004ae86dd92209fb4c [19398] warn: bayes: cannot open bayes databases /home/vpopmail/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: lock failed: File exists @40004ae86dd9220a12bc [19398] info: spamd: processing message 20091028161939.13cca1dec...@mail.fxe.net for clamav:89 @40004ae86ddb32d3b60c [19397] info: spamd: connection from mailserver.mxbyrail.com [127.0.0.1] at port 37783 @40004ae86de234b6a2f4 [19398] warn: bayes: cannot open bayes databases /home/vpopmail/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: lock failed: File exists @40004ae86de41bf6032c [19397] warn: bayes: cannot open bayes databases /home/vpopmail/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: lock failed: File exists @40004ae86de428cbd324 [19397] info: spamd: processing message 20091028161907.3d1f11dec...@mail.fxe.net for clamav:89 @40004ae86dec0ddd379c [19397] warn: bayes: cannot open bayes databases /home/vpopmail/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: lock failed: File exists Anybody help me? Google turns up a number of different instances of similar error messages: http://www.google.com/search?q=spamassassin+lock+failed+file+exists which of these have you tried and eliminated before posting to the list? -steve -- If this were played upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction. - Fabian, Twelfth Night, III,v http://five.sentenc.es PGP.sig Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[qmailtoaster] Re: problem
Noel Rivera (Border Less) wrote: Hello list I check my current log in /var/log/qmail/spam and I have this warning @40004ae86dd92209fb4c [19398] warn: bayes: cannot open bayes databases /home/vpopmail/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: lock failed: File exists @40004ae86dd9220a12bc [19398] info: spamd: processing message 20091028161939.13cca1dec...@mail.fxe.net for clamav:89 @40004ae86ddb32d3b60c [19397] info: spamd: connection from mailserver.mxbyrail.com [127.0.0.1] at port 37783 @40004ae86de234b6a2f4 [19398] warn: bayes: cannot open bayes databases /home/vpopmail/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: lock failed: File exists @40004ae86de41bf6032c [19397] warn: bayes: cannot open bayes databases /home/vpopmail/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: lock failed: File exists @40004ae86de428cbd324 [19397] info: spamd: processing message 20091028161907.3d1f11dec...@mail.fxe.net for clamav:89 @40004ae86dec0ddd379c [19397] warn: bayes: cannot open bayes databases /home/vpopmail/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: lock failed: File exists Anybody help me? Stop qmail Remove lock file(s) /home/vpopmail/.spamassassin/bayes_lock* Start qmail If you have auto_expire turned on (bayes_auto_expire 1) in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf turn it off (bayes_auto_expire 0), and set up a cron job to expire bayes: #!/bin/sh sa-learn -u vpopmail --force-expire chown vpopmail:vchkpw /home/vpopmail/.spamassassin/bayes_toks -- -Eric 'shubes' - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: how to look in the log
Eric Shubert wrote: Jim Shupert wrote: could someone remind me how I might look in the logs to see any and all references to b...@billybob.com here is my situation a user says she is not getting email from ( let us call them ) bi...@billybob.com so i wish to see if billy mail hits my server and is rejected or what not etc. thanks! jS Providing you have QTP installed (and you really should), # qmlog -lc bi...@billybob\.com smtp Cool, eh? Most Cool -- Thanks! -- i wish i had a better idea on how to understand the log might you tell me what relevance the below has - what it means ? why the reject? snip 10-26 08:36:31 CHKUSER accepted sender: from bi...@billybob.com:: remote mail-out2.fuse.net:unknown:216.68.8.171 rcpt : sender accepted 10-26 08:36:31 qmail-smtpd: spf-reject: HELO(mail-out2.fuse.net) from 216.68.8.171. MAILFROM:bi...@billybob.com 10-26 08:36:36 tcpserver: end 3876 status 0 10-26 08:36:36 tcpserver: status: 0/100 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: status: 1/100 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: pid 3877 from 217.23.9.164 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: ok 3877 sifter.pps-inc.com:192.168.200.222:25 :217.23.9.164::1803 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: status: 2/100 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: pid 3878 from 216.37.105.169 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: ok 3878 sifter.pps-inc.com:192.168.200.222:25 :216.37.105.169::33074 10-26 08:36:39 rblsmtpd: 216.37.105.169 pid 3878: 451 http://www.spamhaus.org/SBL/sbl.lasso?query=SBL77346 /snip spf-reject: HELO(mail-out2.fuse.net) from 216.68.8.171. MAILFROM:bi...@billybob.com and i did a spf test w http://www.kitterman.com/spf/validate.html Found v=spf1 record for billybob.com v=spf1 a mx a:ecsubs.com include:cust-spf.exacttarget.com -all my bottom line is it looks like it was accepted [ accepted sender: from bi...@billybob.com:: ] so maybe I should ask my user to look in her spam folder? any informed insights welcomed -- i am learning THANKS! ( and I have changed the name domain , of course ) - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: how to look in the log
Jim Shupert wrote: Eric Shubert wrote: Jim Shupert wrote: could someone remind me how I might look in the logs to see any and all references to b...@billybob.com here is my situation a user says she is not getting email from ( let us call them ) bi...@billybob.com so i wish to see if billy mail hits my server and is rejected or what not etc. thanks! jS Providing you have QTP installed (and you really should), # qmlog -lc bi...@billybob\.com smtp Cool, eh? Most Cool -- Thanks! -- i wish i had a better idea on how to understand the log might you tell me what relevance the below has - what it means ? why the reject? snip 10-26 08:36:31 CHKUSER accepted sender: from bi...@billybob.com:: remote mail-out2.fuse.net:unknown:216.68.8.171 rcpt : sender accepted 10-26 08:36:31 qmail-smtpd: spf-reject: HELO(mail-out2.fuse.net) from 216.68.8.171. MAILFROM:bi...@billybob.com 10-26 08:36:36 tcpserver: end 3876 status 0 10-26 08:36:36 tcpserver: status: 0/100 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: status: 1/100 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: pid 3877 from 217.23.9.164 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: ok 3877 sifter.pps-inc.com:192.168.200.222:25 :217.23.9.164::1803 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: status: 2/100 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: pid 3878 from 216.37.105.169 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: ok 3878 sifter.pps-inc.com:192.168.200.222:25 :216.37.105.169::33074 10-26 08:36:39 rblsmtpd: 216.37.105.169 pid 3878: 451 http://www.spamhaus.org/SBL/sbl.lasso?query=SBL77346 /snip spf-reject: HELO(mail-out2.fuse.net) from 216.68.8.171. MAILFROM:bi...@billybob.com and i did a spf test w http://www.kitterman.com/spf/validate.html Found v=spf1 record for billybob.com v=spf1 a mx a:ecsubs.com include:cust-spf.exacttarget.com -all my bottom line is it looks like it was accepted [ accepted sender: from bi...@billybob.com:: ] so maybe I should ask my user to look in her spam folder? any informed insights welcomed -- i am learning THANKS! ( and I have changed the name domain , of course ) It accepted it because the sender was okay, but the SPF record did not pass. Check your /var/qmail/control/spfbehavior file. It's probably at the default of 3 which is okay for most, but you may need to lower it to 2 or 1 to get that particular email to work. There's more info on the wiki. - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: how to look in the log
On Oct 28, 2009, at 1:14 PM, Jim Shupert wrote: 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: ok 3878 sifter.pps-inc.com: 192.168.200.222:25 :216.37.105.169::33074 10-26 08:36:39 rblsmtpd: 216.37.105.169 pid 3878: 451 http://www.spamhaus.org/SBL/sbl.lasso?query=SBL77346 these two lines are the key. the first line shows the remote mail server (216.37.105.169) initiating a connection to your mail server. the second line shows your mail server refusing the connection because the remote mail server's IP address is in the Spamhaus SBL. to see why, check the URL which is helpfully posted there in your log. Mr. Bob needs to get his mail server delisted, or he's going to have trouble sending to lots of other people besides you. for a more thorough treatment of qmail logs, read John Simpson's excellent page: http://qmail.jms1.net/logfiles.shtml -steve -- If this were played upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction. - Fabian, Twelfth Night, III,v http://five.sentenc.es PGP.sig Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: how to look in the log
Is that slash after billybob (# qmlog -lc bi...@billybob\.com smtp )supposed to be there or is it a typo? Jake Vickers wrote: Jim Shupert wrote: Eric Shubert wrote: Jim Shupert wrote: could someone remind me how I might look in the logs to see any and all references to b...@billybob.com here is my situation a user says she is not getting email from ( let us call them ) bi...@billybob.com so i wish to see if billy mail hits my server and is rejected or what not etc. thanks! jS Providing you have QTP installed (and you really should), # qmlog -lc bi...@billybob\.com smtp Cool, eh? Most Cool -- Thanks! -- i wish i had a better idea on how to understand the log might you tell me what relevance the below has - what it means ? why the reject? snip 10-26 08:36:31 CHKUSER accepted sender: from bi...@billybob.com:: remote mail-out2.fuse.net:unknown:216.68.8.171 rcpt : sender accepted 10-26 08:36:31 qmail-smtpd: spf-reject: HELO(mail-out2.fuse.net) from 216.68.8.171. MAILFROM:bi...@billybob.com 10-26 08:36:36 tcpserver: end 3876 status 0 10-26 08:36:36 tcpserver: status: 0/100 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: status: 1/100 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: pid 3877 from 217.23.9.164 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: ok 3877 sifter.pps-inc.com:192.168.200.222:25 :217.23.9.164::1803 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: status: 2/100 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: pid 3878 from 216.37.105.169 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: ok 3878 sifter.pps-inc.com:192.168.200.222:25 :216.37.105.169::33074 10-26 08:36:39 rblsmtpd: 216.37.105.169 pid 3878: 451 http://www.spamhaus.org/SBL/sbl.lasso?query=SBL77346 /snip spf-reject: HELO(mail-out2.fuse.net) from 216.68.8.171. MAILFROM:bi...@billybob.com and i did a spf test w http://www.kitterman.com/spf/validate.html Found v=spf1 record for billybob.com v=spf1 a mx a:ecsubs.com include:cust-spf.exacttarget.com -all my bottom line is it looks like it was accepted [ accepted sender: from bi...@billybob.com:: ] so maybe I should ask my user to look in her spam folder? any informed insights welcomed -- i am learning THANKS! ( and I have changed the name domain , of course ) It accepted it because the sender was okay, but the SPF record did not pass. Check your /var/qmail/control/spfbehavior file. It's probably at the default of 3 which is okay for most, but you may need to lower it to 2 or 1 to get that particular email to work. There's more info on the wiki. - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com -- Cecil Yother, Jr. cj cj's 2318 Clement Ave Alameda, CA 94501 tel 1.510.865.2787 | fax 1.510.864.7300 http://yother.com - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: how to look in the log
Jake Vickers wrote: Jim Shupert wrote: Eric Shubert wrote: Jim Shupert wrote: could someone remind me how I might look in the logs to see any and all references to b...@billybob.com here is my situation a user says she is not getting email from ( let us call them ) bi...@billybob.com so i wish to see if billy mail hits my server and is rejected or what not etc. thanks! jS Providing you have QTP installed (and you really should), # qmlog -lc bi...@billybob\.com smtp Cool, eh? Most Cool -- Thanks! -- i wish i had a better idea on how to understand the log might you tell me what relevance the below has - what it means ? why the reject? snip 10-26 08:36:31 CHKUSER accepted sender: from bi...@billybob.com:: remote mail-out2.fuse.net:unknown:216.68.8.171 rcpt : sender accepted 10-26 08:36:31 qmail-smtpd: spf-reject: HELO(mail-out2.fuse.net) from 216.68.8.171. MAILFROM:bi...@billybob.com 10-26 08:36:36 tcpserver: end 3876 status 0 10-26 08:36:36 tcpserver: status: 0/100 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: status: 1/100 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: pid 3877 from 217.23.9.164 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: ok 3877 sifter.pps-inc.com:192.168.200.222:25 :217.23.9.164::1803 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: status: 2/100 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: pid 3878 from 216.37.105.169 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: ok 3878 sifter.pps-inc.com:192.168.200.222:25 :216.37.105.169::33074 10-26 08:36:39 rblsmtpd: 216.37.105.169 pid 3878: 451 http://www.spamhaus.org/SBL/sbl.lasso?query=SBL77346 /snip spf-reject: HELO(mail-out2.fuse.net) from 216.68.8.171. MAILFROM:bi...@billybob.com and i did a spf test w http://www.kitterman.com/spf/validate.html Found v=spf1 record for billybob.com v=spf1 a mx a:ecsubs.com include:cust-spf.exacttarget.com -all my bottom line is it looks like it was accepted [ accepted sender: from bi...@billybob.com:: ] so maybe I should ask my user to look in her spam folder? any informed insights welcomed -- i am learning THANKS! ( and I have changed the name domain , of course ) It accepted it because the sender was okay, but the SPF record did not pass. Check your /var/qmail/control/spfbehavior file. It's probably at the default of 3 which is okay for most, but you may need to lower it to 2 or 1 to get that particular email to work. There's more info on the wiki. so more info on the wiki is http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/QMT-ISO_Manual_Guide so I just do the below --( so do 2 things Configure Domain's SPF You can add SPF record for your domain, so other mailserver can recognize which email was sent using your mailserver. Visit SPF http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/SPF page for detail info about it. For your information, there are some admin that may provide SPF record for their domain is wrong syntax. Or DNS server that provide SPF record down. So it may reject emails to your server. thing 1 What I do is change the value into 1 # vi /var/qmail/control/spfbehavior 1 # qmailctl restart Then add these SA rules, so it can prevent bad emails thing 2 # vi /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf # add score to softfail SPF header spf_softfail Received-SPF =~ /\bsoftfail\b/ score spf_softfail 1.0 # add score to fail SPF header spf_fail Received-SPF =~ /\bfail\b/ score spf_fail 2.0 # qmail-spam restart and would it be true that i can just cut paste the above ? thanks!
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: how to look in the log
Jim Shupert wrote: Jake Vickers wrote: Jim Shupert wrote: Eric Shubert wrote: Jim Shupert wrote: could someone remind me how I might look in the logs to see any and all references to b...@billybob.com here is my situation a user says she is not getting email from ( let us call them ) bi...@billybob.com so i wish to see if billy mail hits my server and is rejected or what not etc. thanks! jS Providing you have QTP installed (and you really should), # qmlog -lc bi...@billybob\.com smtp Cool, eh? Most Cool -- Thanks! -- i wish i had a better idea on how to understand the log might you tell me what relevance the below has - what it means ? why the reject? snip 10-26 08:36:31 CHKUSER accepted sender: from bi...@billybob.com:: remote mail-out2.fuse.net:unknown:216.68.8.171 rcpt : sender accepted 10-26 08:36:31 qmail-smtpd: spf-reject: HELO(mail-out2.fuse.net) from 216.68.8.171. MAILFROM:bi...@billybob.com 10-26 08:36:36 tcpserver: end 3876 status 0 10-26 08:36:36 tcpserver: status: 0/100 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: status: 1/100 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: pid 3877 from 217.23.9.164 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: ok 3877 sifter.pps-inc.com:192.168.200.222:25 :217.23.9.164::1803 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: status: 2/100 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: pid 3878 from 216.37.105.169 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: ok 3878 sifter.pps-inc.com:192.168.200.222:25 :216.37.105.169::33074 10-26 08:36:39 rblsmtpd: 216.37.105.169 pid 3878: 451 http://www.spamhaus.org/SBL/sbl.lasso?query=SBL77346 /snip spf-reject: HELO(mail-out2.fuse.net) from 216.68.8.171. MAILFROM:bi...@billybob.com and i did a spf test w http://www.kitterman.com/spf/validate.html Found v=spf1 record for billybob.com v=spf1 a mx a:ecsubs.com include:cust-spf.exacttarget.com -all my bottom line is it looks like it was accepted [ accepted sender: from bi...@billybob.com:: ] so maybe I should ask my user to look in her spam folder? any informed insights welcomed -- i am learning THANKS! ( and I have changed the name domain , of course ) It accepted it because the sender was okay, but the SPF record did not pass. Check your /var/qmail/control/spfbehavior file. It's probably at the default of 3 which is okay for most, but you may need to lower it to 2 or 1 to get that particular email to work. There's more info on the wiki. so more info on the wiki is http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/QMT-ISO_Manual_Guide so I just do the below --( so do 2 things Configure Domain's SPF You can add SPF record for your domain, so other mailserver can recognize which email was sent using your mailserver. Visit SPF http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/SPF page for detail info about it. For your information, there are some admin that may provide SPF record for their domain is wrong syntax. Or DNS server that provide SPF record down. So it may reject emails to your server. thing 1 What I do is change the value into 1 # vi /var/qmail/control/spfbehavior 1 # qmailctl restart Then add these SA rules, so it can prevent bad emails thing 2 # vi /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf # add score to softfail SPF header spf_softfail Received-SPF =~ /\bsoftfail\b/ score spf_softfail 1.0 # add score to fail SPF header spf_fail Received-SPF =~ /\bfail\b/ score spf_fail 2.0 # qmail-spam restart and would it be true that i can just cut paste the above ? thanks! That will work, yes. Guess we should launch a group to update/organize the wiki a little. Any volunteers?
[qmailtoaster] Re: how to look in the log
The argument to the -lc (logs containing) flag is a regular expression, or regex for short. The period is a special regex character meaning match any character. The backslash escapes this special meaning so the period is treated literally as a period and not any character. It would probably work the same either way, but without the slash the regex would also (for instance) match bi...@billybobxcom. Not likely that any other string in the logs would match with something other than a period in that position. I just included it so you would ask, and I could explain. ;) Maxwell Smart wrote: Is that slash after billybob (# qmlog -lc bi...@billybob\.com smtp )supposed to be there or is it a typo? Jake Vickers wrote: Jim Shupert wrote: Eric Shubert wrote: Jim Shupert wrote: could someone remind me how I might look in the logs to see any and all references to b...@billybob.com here is my situation a user says she is not getting email from ( let us call them ) bi...@billybob.com so i wish to see if billy mail hits my server and is rejected or what not etc. thanks! jS Providing you have QTP installed (and you really should), # qmlog -lc bi...@billybob\.com smtp Cool, eh? Most Cool -- Thanks! -- i wish i had a better idea on how to understand the log might you tell me what relevance the below has - what it means ? why the reject? snip 10-26 08:36:31 CHKUSER accepted sender: from bi...@billybob.com:: remote mail-out2.fuse.net:unknown:216.68.8.171 rcpt : sender accepted 10-26 08:36:31 qmail-smtpd: spf-reject: HELO(mail-out2.fuse.net) from 216.68.8.171. MAILFROM:bi...@billybob.com 10-26 08:36:36 tcpserver: end 3876 status 0 10-26 08:36:36 tcpserver: status: 0/100 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: status: 1/100 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: pid 3877 from 217.23.9.164 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: ok 3877 sifter.pps-inc.com:192.168.200.222:25 :217.23.9.164::1803 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: status: 2/100 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: pid 3878 from 216.37.105.169 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: ok 3878 sifter.pps-inc.com:192.168.200.222:25 :216.37.105.169::33074 10-26 08:36:39 rblsmtpd: 216.37.105.169 pid 3878: 451 http://www.spamhaus.org/SBL/sbl.lasso?query=SBL77346 /snip spf-reject: HELO(mail-out2.fuse.net) from 216.68.8.171. MAILFROM:bi...@billybob.com and i did a spf test w http://www.kitterman.com/spf/validate.html Found v=spf1 record for billybob.com v=spf1 a mx a:ecsubs.com include:cust-spf.exacttarget.com -all my bottom line is it looks like it was accepted [ accepted sender: from bi...@billybob.com:: ] so maybe I should ask my user to look in her spam folder? any informed insights welcomed -- i am learning THANKS! ( and I have changed the name domain , of course ) It accepted it because the sender was okay, but the SPF record did not pass. Check your /var/qmail/control/spfbehavior file. It's probably at the default of 3 which is okay for most, but you may need to lower it to 2 or 1 to get that particular email to work. There's more info on the wiki. -- -Eric 'shubes' - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
[qmailtoaster] ppc install?
Hello all. I've been away for quite a while and haven't followed qmailtoaster's progress very closely. I am now getting back into it and I'd like to update a very old qmailtoaster (2004) install but I'm uncertain if the hardware is still supported. I have a ppc that I'd like to reuse for this purpose but, after a couple of days, I can't find anything that says it is still supported. In the past I remember I used to pass redhat arguments to the rpms during install but with the new OS advancements ppc support may be just a memory. Machine specs are below: Machine - PPC power tower pro OS - yellow dog linux 4.0 (redhat variant) I did find one reference to ppc in the mailing lists but it was vague. It might have been a reference to a client not the server. Any suggestions are of course welcomed.
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: how to look in the log
Steve Huff wrote: On Oct 28, 2009, at 1:14 PM, Jim Shupert wrote: 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: ok 3878 sifter.pps-inc.com:192.168.200.222:25 :216.37.105.169::33074 10-26 08:36:39 rblsmtpd: 216.37.105.169 pid 3878: 451 http://www.spamhaus.org/SBL/sbl.lasso?query=SBL77346 these two lines are the key. the first line shows the remote mail server (216.37.105.169) initiating a connection to your mail server. the second line shows your mail server refusing the connection because the remote mail server's IP address is in the Spamhaus SBL. to see why, check the URL which is helpfully posted there in your log. Mr. Bob needs to get his mail server delisted, or he's going to have trouble sending to lots of other people besides you. for a more thorough treatment of qmail logs, read John Simpson's excellent page: http://qmail.jms1.net/logfiles.shtml -steve Thanks -- especially thanks for the excellent page ref. here is what i do not understand though if his email server is 216.37.105.169 and I go to spam Haus http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/sbl.lasso?query=SBL77346 i see snip Ref: SBL77346 216.37.96.0/20 is listed on the Spamhaus Block List (SBL) /snip isn't that a diff subnet ? 216.37.*105.*169 -him , noted offender 216.37*.96.0/20 *I am confused -- could I have snipped to deeply in my 1st email -- are we --certain-- 216.37.*105.*169 is blacklisted? thanks again!
Re: [qmailtoaster] ppc install?
Donald Wheeling wrote: Hello all. I've been away for quite a while and haven't followed qmailtoaster's progress very closely. I am now getting back into it and I'd like to update a very old qmailtoaster (2004) install but I'm uncertain if the hardware is still supported. I have a ppc that I'd like to reuse for this purpose but, after a couple of days, I can't find anything that says it is still supported. In the past I remember I used to pass redhat arguments to the rpms during install but with the new OS advancements ppc support may be just a memory. Machine specs are below: Machine - PPC power tower pro OS - yellow dog linux 4.0 (redhat variant) I did find one reference to ppc in the mailing lists but it was vague. It might have been a reference to a client not the server. Any suggestions are of course welcomed. Welcome back! The build flags you used then will still work today. You will need to use the cnt40 flag for your particular case, since that will be CentOS 4 which is (almost) the same as Yellow Dog 4 (if I remember correctly), or you can use rht90 which will compile for generic Redhat 9.0. I unfortunately do not have any PPC hardware (nor even a copy of YD4!) to test on, so please post back here on any updates/progress you make.
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: how to look in the log
On Oct 28, 2009, at 2:08 PM, Jim Shupert wrote: isn't that a diff subnet ? 216.37.105.169 -him , noted offender 216.37.96.0/20 it is not. welcome to CIDR :) http://www.subnet-calculator.com/cidr.php enter the offending subnet as listed by Spamhaus (216.37.96.0) in the IP Address fields, then enter 20 (the /20 part of the address) in the Mask Bits field, then look at the CIDR Address Range field to see which IP addresses fall within the subnet. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classless_Inter-Domain_Routing -steve -- If this were played upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction. - Fabian, Twelfth Night, III,v http://five.sentenc.es PGP.sig Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: how to look in the log
OK got it. Eric Shubert wrote: The argument to the -lc (logs containing) flag is a regular expression, or regex for short. The period is a special regex character meaning match any character. The backslash escapes this special meaning so the period is treated literally as a period and not any character. It would probably work the same either way, but without the slash the regex would also (for instance) match bi...@billybobxcom. Not likely that any other string in the logs would match with something other than a period in that position. I just included it so you would ask, and I could explain. ;) Maxwell Smart wrote: Is that slash after billybob (# qmlog -lc bi...@billybob\.com smtp )supposed to be there or is it a typo? Jake Vickers wrote: Jim Shupert wrote: Eric Shubert wrote: Jim Shupert wrote: could someone remind me how I might look in the logs to see any and all references to b...@billybob.com here is my situation a user says she is not getting email from ( let us call them ) bi...@billybob.com so i wish to see if billy mail hits my server and is rejected or what not etc. thanks! jS Providing you have QTP installed (and you really should), # qmlog -lc bi...@billybob\.com smtp Cool, eh? Most Cool -- Thanks! -- i wish i had a better idea on how to understand the log might you tell me what relevance the below has - what it means ? why the reject? snip 10-26 08:36:31 CHKUSER accepted sender: from bi...@billybob.com:: remote mail-out2.fuse.net:unknown:216.68.8.171 rcpt : sender accepted 10-26 08:36:31 qmail-smtpd: spf-reject: HELO(mail-out2.fuse.net) from 216.68.8.171. MAILFROM:bi...@billybob.com 10-26 08:36:36 tcpserver: end 3876 status 0 10-26 08:36:36 tcpserver: status: 0/100 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: status: 1/100 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: pid 3877 from 217.23.9.164 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: ok 3877 sifter.pps-inc.com:192.168.200.222:25 :217.23.9.164::1803 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: status: 2/100 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: pid 3878 from 216.37.105.169 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: ok 3878 sifter.pps-inc.com:192.168.200.222:25 :216.37.105.169::33074 10-26 08:36:39 rblsmtpd: 216.37.105.169 pid 3878: 451 http://www.spamhaus.org/SBL/sbl.lasso?query=SBL77346 /snip spf-reject: HELO(mail-out2.fuse.net) from 216.68.8.171. MAILFROM:bi...@billybob.com and i did a spf test w http://www.kitterman.com/spf/validate.html Found v=spf1 record for billybob.com v=spf1 a mx a:ecsubs.com include:cust-spf.exacttarget.com -all my bottom line is it looks like it was accepted [ accepted sender: from bi...@billybob.com:: ] so maybe I should ask my user to look in her spam folder? any informed insights welcomed -- i am learning THANKS! ( and I have changed the name domain , of course ) It accepted it because the sender was okay, but the SPF record did not pass. Check your /var/qmail/control/spfbehavior file. It's probably at the default of 3 which is okay for most, but you may need to lower it to 2 or 1 to get that particular email to work. There's more info on the wiki. -- Cecil Yother, Jr. cj cj's 2318 Clement Ave Alameda, CA 94501 tel 1.510.865.2787 | fax 1.510.864.7300 http://yother.com - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] ppc install?
On Oct 28, 2009, at 2:18 PM, Jake Vickers wrote: The build flags you used then will still work today. You will need to use the cnt40 flag for your particular case, since that will be CentOS 4 i'd also be interested to know if any of the necessary third-party packages (mostly Perl modules) are *not* available in RPMforge for el4 PPC. the appropriate configuration RPM is available here: http://packages.sw.be/rpmforge-release/rpmforge-release-0.4.0-1.el4.rf.ppc.rpm please install this package as soon as you've finished installing CentOS 4 and pulling down the latest patches, but before you start install Qmailtoaster. again, please make note of any packages that are not automatically found by yum and let me know, so that i can track down why they aren't available. -steve -- If this were played upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction. - Fabian, Twelfth Night, III,v http://five.sentenc.es PGP.sig Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: how to look in the log
Jim Shupert wrote: Steve Huff wrote: On Oct 28, 2009, at 1:14 PM, Jim Shupert wrote: 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: ok 3878 sifter.pps-inc.com:192.168.200.222:25 :216.37.105.169::33074 10-26 08:36:39 rblsmtpd: 216.37.105.169 pid 3878: 451 http://www.spamhaus.org/SBL/sbl.lasso?query=SBL77346 these two lines are the key. the first line shows the remote mail server (216.37.105.169) initiating a connection to your mail server. the second line shows your mail server refusing the connection because the remote mail server's IP address is in the Spamhaus SBL. to see why, check the URL which is helpfully posted there in your log. Mr. Bob needs to get his mail server delisted, or he's going to have trouble sending to lots of other people besides you. for a more thorough treatment of qmail logs, read John Simpson's excellent page: http://qmail.jms1.net/logfiles.shtml -steve Thanks -- especially thanks for the excellent page ref. here is what i do not understand though if his email server is 216.37.105.169 and I go to spam Haus http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/sbl.lasso?query=SBL77346 i see snip Ref: SBL77346 216.37.96.0/20 is listed on the Spamhaus Block List (SBL) /snip isn't that a diff subnet ? 216.37.105.169 -him , noted offender 216.37.96.0/20 I am confused -- could I have snipped to deeply in my 1st email -- are we --certain-- 216.37.105.169 is blacklisted? thanks again! The subnet 216.37.96.0/20 would contain 4094 ip addresses. The first being 216.37.96.1 and the last being 216.37.111.254. So yes, 216.37.105.169 would be in range and blacklisted. Dave - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
[qmailtoaster] Re: ppc install?
Steve Huff wrote: On Oct 28, 2009, at 2:18 PM, Jake Vickers wrote: The build flags you used then will still work today. You will need to use the cnt40 flag for your particular case, since that will be CentOS 4 i'd also be interested to know if any of the necessary third-party packages (mostly Perl modules) are *not* available in RPMforge for el4 PPC. the appropriate configuration RPM is available here: http://packages.sw.be/rpmforge-release/rpmforge-release-0.4.0-1.el4.rf.ppc.rpm please install this package as soon as you've finished installing CentOS 4 and pulling down the latest patches, but before you start install Qmailtoaster. again, please make note of any packages that are not automatically found by yum and let me know, so that i can track down why they aren't available. -steve -- It'd be nice if FUSE-unionfs was available for this. Which is the latest kernel version for YD4? (Same as COS4?) -- -Eric 'shubes' - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: how to look in the log
OK this one --I do* know Maxwell Smart wrote: Is that slash after billybob (# qmlog -lc bi...@billybob\.com smtp )supposed to be there or is it a typo? the Slash after ..bob is correct it is an 'escape char' to allow for the coming Dot bi...@billybob ESCAPE .com bi...@billybob\.com slash use = good ( i love this list. ; we should get together more often! ) -jS Jake Vickers wrote: Jim Shupert wrote: Eric Shubert wrote: Jim Shupert wrote: could someone remind me how I might look in the logs to see any and all references to b...@billybob.com here is my situation a user says she is not getting email from ( let us call them ) bi...@billybob.com so i wish to see if billy mail hits my server and is rejected or what not etc. thanks! jS Providing you have QTP installed (and you really should), # qmlog -lc bi...@billybob\.com smtp Cool, eh? Most Cool -- Thanks! -- i wish i had a better idea on how to understand the log might you tell me what relevance the below has - what it means ? why the reject? snip 10-26 08:36:31 CHKUSER accepted sender: from bi...@billybob.com:: remote mail-out2.fuse.net:unknown:216.68.8.171 rcpt : sender accepted 10-26 08:36:31 qmail-smtpd: spf-reject: HELO(mail-out2.fuse.net) from 216.68.8.171. MAILFROM:bi...@billybob.com 10-26 08:36:36 tcpserver: end 3876 status 0 10-26 08:36:36 tcpserver: status: 0/100 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: status: 1/100 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: pid 3877 from 217.23.9.164 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: ok 3877 sifter.pps-inc.com:192.168.200.222:25 :217.23.9.164::1803 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: status: 2/100 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: pid 3878 from 216.37.105.169 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: ok 3878 sifter.pps-inc.com:192.168.200.222:25 :216.37.105.169::33074 10-26 08:36:39 rblsmtpd: 216.37.105.169 pid 3878: 451 http://www.spamhaus.org/SBL/sbl.lasso?query=SBL77346 /snip spf-reject: HELO(mail-out2.fuse.net) from 216.68.8.171. MAILFROM:bi...@billybob.com and i did a spf test w http://www.kitterman.com/spf/validate.html Found v=spf1 record for billybob.com v=spf1 a mx a:ecsubs.com include:cust-spf.exacttarget.com -all my bottom line is it looks like it was accepted [ accepted sender: from bi...@billybob.com:: ] so maybe I should ask my user to look in her spam folder? any informed insights welcomed -- i am learning THANKS! ( and I have changed the name domain , of course ) It accepted it because the sender was okay, but the SPF record did not pass. Check your /var/qmail/control/spfbehavior file. It's probably at the default of 3 which is okay for most, but you may need to lower it to 2 or 1 to get that particular email to work. There's more info on the wiki. - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.423 / Virus Database: 270.14.36/2465 - Release Date: 10/28/09 09:34:00
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: how to look in the log
Jake Vickers wrote: Jim Shupert wrote: Jake Vickers wrote: Jim Shupert wrote: Eric Shubert wrote: Jim Shupert wrote: could someone remind me how I might look in the logs to see any and all references to b...@billybob.com here is my situation a user says she is not getting email from ( let us call them ) bi...@billybob.com so i wish to see if billy mail hits my server and is rejected or what not etc. thanks! jS Providing you have QTP installed (and you really should), # qmlog -lc bi...@billybob\.com smtp Cool, eh? Most Cool -- Thanks! -- i wish i had a better idea on how to understand the log might you tell me what relevance the below has - what it means ? why the reject? snip 10-26 08:36:31 CHKUSER accepted sender: from bi...@billybob.com:: remote mail-out2.fuse.net:unknown:216.68.8.171 rcpt : sender accepted 10-26 08:36:31 qmail-smtpd: spf-reject: HELO(mail-out2.fuse.net) from 216.68.8.171. MAILFROM:bi...@billybob.com 10-26 08:36:36 tcpserver: end 3876 status 0 10-26 08:36:36 tcpserver: status: 0/100 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: status: 1/100 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: pid 3877 from 217.23.9.164 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: ok 3877 sifter.pps-inc.com:192.168.200.222:25 :217.23.9.164::1803 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: status: 2/100 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: pid 3878 from 216.37.105.169 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: ok 3878 sifter.pps-inc.com:192.168.200.222:25 :216.37.105.169::33074 10-26 08:36:39 rblsmtpd: 216.37.105.169 pid 3878: 451 http://www.spamhaus.org/SBL/sbl.lasso?query=SBL77346 /snip spf-reject: HELO(mail-out2.fuse.net) from 216.68.8.171. MAILFROM:bi...@billybob.com and i did a spf test w http://www.kitterman.com/spf/validate.html Found v=spf1 record for billybob.com v=spf1 a mx a:ecsubs.com include:cust-spf.exacttarget.com -all my bottom line is it looks like it was accepted [ accepted sender: from bi...@billybob.com:: ] so maybe I should ask my user to look in her spam folder? any informed insights welcomed -- i am learning THANKS! ( and I have changed the name domain , of course ) It accepted it because the sender was okay, but the SPF record did not pass. Check your /var/qmail/control/spfbehavior file. It's probably at the default of 3 which is okay for most, but you may need to lower it to 2 or 1 to get that particular email to work. There's more info on the wiki. so more info on the wiki is http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/QMT-ISO_Manual_Guide so I just do the below --( so do 2 things Configure Domain's SPF You can add SPF record for your domain, so other mailserver can recognize which email was sent using your mailserver. Visit SPF http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/SPF page for detail info about it. For your information, there are some admin that may provide SPF record for their domain is wrong syntax. Or DNS server that provide SPF record down. So it may reject emails to your server. thing 1 What I do is change the value into 1 # vi /var/qmail/control/spfbehavior 1 # qmailctl restart Then add these SA rules, so it can prevent bad emails thing 2 # vi /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf # add score to softfail SPF header spf_softfail Received-SPF =~ /\bsoftfail\b/ score spf_softfail 1.0 # add score to fail SPF header spf_fail Received-SPF =~ /\bfail\b/ score spf_fail 2.0 # qmail-spam restart and would it be true that i can just cut paste the above ? thanks! That will work, yes. Guess we should launch a group to update/organize the wiki a little. Any volunteers? I would enjoy giving back to the community -- i only wonder if i --- am a good choice [?] -- elzewize i Volunteer and Thanks!
RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: qtp-newmodel fails on FUSE
I have an x64 system running on the new kernel. It is a vmware guest. I ran into the fuse error problem as well. I actually ran into this problem on the test x64 machine and a x86 production machine. Both seemed to resolve themselves with a reboot. Regards, Scott Collingwood -Original Message- From: news [mailto:n...@ger.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Eric Shubert Sent: October-28-09 9:21 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: [qmailtoaster] Re: qtp-newmodel fails on FUSE Wim Godden wrote: Eric Shubert wrote: Wait a sec. I just noticed that this is x86_64. Doh! The FUSE unionfs hasn't been tested on that arch yet. That explains why fuse doesn't necessarily work. Ben and CJ, are your problem toasters 64-bit as well?? Is anyone with a x86_64 toaster actually running a newer kernel? Please chime in. Maybe this might shed a light on things : My /boot/grub/device.map contains : # this device map was generated by anaconda (hd0) /dev/mapper/ddf1_Main but /dev/mapper/ddf1_Main is not mounted. Instead /dev/sda1 is mounted. So grub might not install itself because of this ? My /boot/grub/device.map contains: # this device map was generated by anaconda (hd0) /dev/sda See http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/html_node/Device-map.html I would try commenting out the existing line, and adding the line as in the file I have. I've no idea what ddf1_Main is. It wouldn't need to be mounted, as grub does its thing well before mounting takes place. Just out of curiosity, what does: # ls -l /dev/mapper/ddf1_Main show you? -- -Eric 'shubes' - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4552 (20091028) __ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4552 (20091028) __ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: problem
Thanks for your Help. Saludos. Borderless Consulting Group SA de CV. Noel Alban Rivera Rivera Jefe de Redes y Telecomunicaciones Tel. (656) 611-09-00 Nextel 62*142650*2 Por favor considera el medio ambiente antes de imprimir este e-mail. -- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message including attachments, if any, is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and /or privileged material. Any review, use, disclosure or distribution of such confidential information without the written authorization of Borderless Consulting Group is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. By receiving this e-mail you acknowledge that any breach by you and/or your representatives of the above provisions may entitle Borderless Consulting Group to seek for damages. AVISO DE CONFIDENCIALIDAD: Este correo electrónico, incluyendo en su caso, los archivos adjuntos al mismo, pueden contener información de carácter confidencial y/o privilegiada, y se envían a la atención única y exclusivamente de la persona y/o entidad a quien va dirigido. La copia, revisión, uso, revelación y/o distribución de dicha información confidencial sin la autorización por escrito de Borderless Consulting Group está prohibida. Si usted no es el destinatario a quien se dirige el presente correo, favor de contactar al remitente respondiendo al presente correo y eliminar el correo original incluyendo sus archivos, así como cualesquiera copia del mismo. Mediante la recepción del presente correo usted reconoce y acepta que en caso de incumplimiento de su parte y/o de sus representantes a los términos antes mencionados, Borderless Consulting Group tendrá derecho a los daños y perjuicios que esto le cause. -Original Message- From: news [mailto:n...@ger.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Eric Shubert Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 9:31 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: [qmailtoaster] Re: problem Noel Rivera (Border Less) wrote: Hello list I check my current log in /var/log/qmail/spam and I have this warning @40004ae86dd92209fb4c [19398] warn: bayes: cannot open bayes databases /home/vpopmail/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: lock failed: File exists @40004ae86dd9220a12bc [19398] info: spamd: processing message 20091028161939.13cca1dec...@mail.fxe.net for clamav:89 @40004ae86ddb32d3b60c [19397] info: spamd: connection from mailserver.mxbyrail.com [127.0.0.1] at port 37783 @40004ae86de234b6a2f4 [19398] warn: bayes: cannot open bayes databases /home/vpopmail/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: lock failed: File exists @40004ae86de41bf6032c [19397] warn: bayes: cannot open bayes databases /home/vpopmail/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: lock failed: File exists @40004ae86de428cbd324 [19397] info: spamd: processing message 20091028161907.3d1f11dec...@mail.fxe.net for clamav:89 @40004ae86dec0ddd379c [19397] warn: bayes: cannot open bayes databases /home/vpopmail/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: lock failed: File exists Anybody help me? Stop qmail Remove lock file(s) /home/vpopmail/.spamassassin/bayes_lock* Start qmail If you have auto_expire turned on (bayes_auto_expire 1) in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf turn it off (bayes_auto_expire 0), and set up a cron job to expire bayes: #!/bin/sh sa-learn -u vpopmail --force-expire chown vpopmail:vchkpw /home/vpopmail/.spamassassin/bayes_toks -- -Eric 'shubes' - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail:
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: how to look in the log
Jim Shupert wrote: That will work, yes. Guess we should launch a group to update/organize the wiki a little. Any volunteers? I would enjoy giving back to the community -- i only wonder if i --- am a good choice [?] -- elzewize i Volunteer and Thanks! Sure you're a good choice! The wiki has a couple ins-and-outs to be learned, but they're not too bad. Then it's just a matter of organizing the information to make it easier to find, and updating old information for the new options and such. Register on the wiki and read the associated help documents on how to write articles and look at some of the ones already written. If something gets messed up too bad, I'm sure someone will come along and fix/revert it. Thanks!
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: how to look in the log
Hi Everyone, Even I would appreciate to become the Volunteer. But I'm new to LINUX, Mail Server and other stuffs hope that won't affect me to become a Volunteer. Actually this is my first mailing list where I joined and I'm really feeling good to join such wonderful mailing list. Jake, Eric and others are really helpful to newbies like me. Cheers to all of yoou for wonderful help. I would really appreciate to become Volunteer for such a wonderful mailing list. Thanks, Amit On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:39 AM, Jim Shupert jshup...@pps-inc.com wrote: Jake Vickers wrote: Jim Shupert wrote: Jake Vickers wrote: Jim Shupert wrote: Eric Shubert wrote: Jim Shupert wrote: could someone remind me how I might look in the logs to see any and all references to b...@billybob.com here is my situation a user says she is not getting email from ( let us call them ) bi...@billybob.com so i wish to see if billy mail hits my server and is rejected or what not etc. thanks! jS Providing you have QTP installed (and you really should), # qmlog -lc bi...@billybob\.com bi...@billybob%5c.com smtp Cool, eh? Most Cool -- Thanks! -- i wish i had a better idea on how to understand the log might you tell me what relevance the below has - what it means ? why the reject? snip 10-26 08:36:31 CHKUSER accepted sender: from bi...@billybob.com::bi...@billybob.com:: remote mail-out2.fuse.net:unknown:216.68.8.171 rcpt : sender accepted 10-26 08:36:31 qmail-smtpd: spf-reject: HELO(mail-out2.fuse.net) from 216.68.8.171. MAILFROM:bi...@billybob.com 10-26 08:36:36 tcpserver: end 3876 status 0 10-26 08:36:36 tcpserver: status: 0/100 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: status: 1/100 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: pid 3877 from 217.23.9.164 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: ok 3877 sifter.pps-inc.com:192.168.200.222:25 :217.23.9.164::1803 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: status: 2/100 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: pid 3878 from 216.37.105.169 10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: ok 3878 sifter.pps-inc.com:192.168.200.222:25 :216.37.105.169::33074 10-26 08:36:39 rblsmtpd: 216.37.105.169 pid 3878: 451 http://www.spamhaus.org/SBL/sbl.lasso?query=SBL77346 /snip spf-reject: HELO(mail-out2.fuse.net) from 216.68.8.171. MAILFROM:bi...@billybob.com and i did a spf test w http://www.kitterman.com/spf/validate.html Found v=spf1 record for billybob.com v=spf1 a mx a:ecsubs.com include:cust-spf.exacttarget.com -all my bottom line is it looks like it was accepted [ accepted sender: from bi...@billybob.com:: bi...@billybob.com:: ] so maybe I should ask my user to look in her spam folder? any informed insights welcomed -- i am learning THANKS! ( and I have changed the name domain , of course ) It accepted it because the sender was okay, but the SPF record did not pass. Check your /var/qmail/control/spfbehavior file. It's probably at the default of 3 which is okay for most, but you may need to lower it to 2 or 1 to get that particular email to work. There's more info on the wiki. so more info on the wiki is http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/QMT-ISO_Manual_Guide so I just do the below --( so do 2 things Configure Domain's SPF You can add SPF record for your domain, so other mailserver can recognize which email was sent using your mailserver. Visit SPFhttp://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/SPFpage for detail info about it. For your information, there are some admin that may provide SPF record for their domain is wrong syntax. Or DNS server that provide SPF record down. So it may reject emails to your server. thing 1 What I do is change the value into 1 # vi /var/qmail/control/spfbehavior 1 # qmailctl restart Then add these SA rules, so it can prevent bad emails thing 2 # vi /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf # add score to softfail SPF header spf_softfail Received-SPF =~ /\bsoftfail\b/ score spf_softfail 1.0 # add score to fail SPF header spf_fail Received-SPF =~ /\bfail\b/ score spf_fail 2.0 # qmail-spam restart and would it be true that i can just cut paste the above ? thanks! That will work, yes. Guess we should launch a group to update/organize the wiki a little. Any volunteers? I would enjoy giving back to the community -- i only wonder if i --- am a good choice [?] -- elzewize i Volunteer and Thanks!
[qmailtoaster] chkuser problem again
I am trying to disable chkuser by adding the SENDER_NOCHECK=1 in the tcp.smtp file ( I use qcontrol ) 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,DKSIGN=/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private,RBLSMTPD=,NOP0FCHECK=1SENDER_NOCHECK=1 Still get errors on the sending computer in /var/spool/mail/myname host mx.abcdefg.com[12.34.56.78] said: 511 sorry, can't find a valid MX for sender domain (#5.1.1 - chkuser) (in reply to MAIL FROM command) ( host name IP change to protect the innocent ) When i even manyally reload the cdb with : qmailctl cdb I get this error : tcprules: fatal: unable to parse this line: 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,DKSIGN=/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private,RBLSMTPD=,NOP0FCHECK=1SENDER_NOCHECK=1 Reloaded /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp Reloaded /var/qmail/control/badmimetypes.cdb Reloaded /var/qmail/control/badloadertypes.cdb Reloaded /var/qmail/control/simversions.cdb Reloaded /var/qmail/control/simcontrol.cdb As I said above adding the SENDER_NOCHECK=1 did not work. Thanks madmac - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] chkuser problem again
On Oct 28, 2009, at 4:39 PM, sysadmin wrote: tcprules: fatal: unable to parse this line: 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,DKSIGN=/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/ private,RBLSMTPD=,NOP0FCHECK=1SENDER_NOCHECK=1 see the word fatal up there? that means badness. if you see a warning like that, you should not expect that everything will work correctly. you forgot the comma between the NOP0FCHECK and SENDER_NOCHECK directives. -steve -- If this were played upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction. - Fabian, Twelfth Night, III,v http://five.sentenc.es PGP.sig Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [qmailtoaster] chkuser problem again
sysadmin wrote: I am trying to disable chkuser by adding the SENDER_NOCHECK=1 in the tcp.smtp file ( I use qcontrol ) 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,DKSIGN=/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private,RBLSMTPD=,NOP0FCHECK=1SENDER_NOCHECK=1 Still get errors on the sending computer in /var/spool/mail/myname host mx.abcdefg.com[12.34.56.78] said: 511 sorry, can't find a valid MX for sender domain (#5.1.1 - chkuser) (in reply to MAIL FROM command) ( host name IP change to protect the innocent ) When i even manyally reload the cdb with : qmailctl cdb I get this error : tcprules: fatal: unable to parse this line: 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,DKSIGN=/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private,RBLSMTPD=,NOP0FCHECK=1SENDER_NOCHECK=1 Reloaded /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp Reloaded /var/qmail/control/badmimetypes.cdb Reloaded /var/qmail/control/badloadertypes.cdb Reloaded /var/qmail/control/simversions.cdb Reloaded /var/qmail/control/simcontrol.cdb As I said above adding the SENDER_NOCHECK=1 did not work. Thanks madmac Are you running the latest version of QControl? I think there was a bug with linefeeds produced by PHP that would cause the tcp.smtp file to be incorrectly parsed. The new version should fix this, or you can edit it and fix it yourself. There was a post a couple months back about this, especially as it relates to the invalid MX for sender domain - that's a different switch you need to add to the tcp.smtp file. Or get the sending email to add an MX entry for their domain - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] chkuser problem again
Hi Madmac, I was facing the same problem. Used dos2unix command to solved the problem. you can try by running dos2unix tcp.smtp in tcp.d folder. Regards, Amit On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 1:18 AM, Jake Vickers j...@qmailtoaster.com wrote: sysadmin wrote: I am trying to disable chkuser by adding the SENDER_NOCHECK=1 in the tcp.smtp file ( I use qcontrol ) 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,DKSIGN=/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private,RBLSMTPD=,NOP0FCHECK=1SENDER_NOCHECK=1 Still get errors on the sending computer in /var/spool/mail/myname host mx.abcdefg.com[12.34.56.78] said: 511 sorry, can't find a valid MX for sender domain (#5.1.1 - chkuser) (in reply to MAIL FROM command) ( host name IP change to protect the innocent ) When i even manyally reload the cdb with : qmailctl cdb I get this error : tcprules: fatal: unable to parse this line: 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,DKSIGN=/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private,RBLSMTPD=,NOP0FCHECK=1SENDER_NOCHECK=1 Reloaded /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp Reloaded /var/qmail/control/badmimetypes.cdb Reloaded /var/qmail/control/badloadertypes.cdb Reloaded /var/qmail/control/simversions.cdb Reloaded /var/qmail/control/simcontrol.cdb As I said above adding the SENDER_NOCHECK=1 did not work. Thanks madmac Are you running the latest version of QControl? I think there was a bug with linefeeds produced by PHP that would cause the tcp.smtp file to be incorrectly parsed. The new version should fix this, or you can edit it and fix it yourself. There was a post a couple months back about this, especially as it relates to the invalid MX for sender domain - that's a different switch you need to add to the tcp.smtp file. Or get the sending email to add an MX entry for their domain - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group ( www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] chkuser problem again
Don't you need a comma to separate the commands? NOP0FCHECK=1SENDER_NOCHECK=1 ^ here Dave sysadmin wrote: I am trying to disable chkuser by adding the SENDER_NOCHECK=1 in the tcp.smtp file ( I use qcontrol ) 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,DKSIGN=/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private,RBLSMTPD=,NOP0FCHECK=1SENDER_NOCHECK=1 Still get errors on the sending computer in /var/spool/mail/myname host mx.abcdefg.com[12.34.56.78] said: 511 sorry, can't find a valid MX for sender domain (#5.1.1 - chkuser) (in reply to MAIL FROM command) ( host name IP change to protect the innocent ) When i even manyally reload the cdb with : qmailctl cdb I get this error : tcprules: fatal: unable to parse this line: 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,DKSIGN=/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private,RBLSMTPD=,NOP0FCHECK=1SENDER_NOCHECK=1 Reloaded /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp Reloaded /var/qmail/control/badmimetypes.cdb Reloaded /var/qmail/control/badloadertypes.cdb Reloaded /var/qmail/control/simversions.cdb Reloaded /var/qmail/control/simcontrol.cdb As I said above adding the SENDER_NOCHECK=1 did not work. Thanks madmac - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] chkuser problem again
Damm stubby fingers, Thanks Steve, I will reset and try that. madmac Steve Huff wrote: On Oct 28, 2009, at 4:39 PM, sysadmin wrote: tcprules: fatal: unable to parse this line: 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,DKSIGN=/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private,RBLSMTPD=,NOP0FCHECK=1SENDER_NOCHECK=1 see the word fatal up there? that means badness. if you see a warning like that, you should not expect that everything will work correctly. you forgot the comma between the NOP0FCHECK and SENDER_NOCHECK directives. -steve -- If this were played upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction. - Fabian, Twelfth Night, III,v http://five.sentenc.es - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] chkuser problem again
Still get same error : host mx.abcdf.com[12.34.56.78] said: 511 sorry, can't find a valid MX for sender domain (#5.1.1 - chkuser) (in reply to MAIL FROM command) AND fatal: unable to parse this line: 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,DKSIGN=/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private,RBLSMTPD=,NOP0FCHECK=1,SENDER_NOCHECK=1 madmac sysadmin wrote: Damm stubby fingers, Thanks Steve, I will reset and try that. madmac Steve Huff wrote: On Oct 28, 2009, at 4:39 PM, sysadmin wrote: tcprules: fatal: unable to parse this line: 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,DKSIGN=/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private,RBLSMTPD=,NOP0FCHECK=1SENDER_NOCHECK=1 see the word fatal up there? that means badness. if you see a warning like that, you should not expect that everything will work correctly. you forgot the comma between the NOP0FCHECK and SENDER_NOCHECK directives. -steve -- If this were played upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction. - Fabian, Twelfth Night, III,v http://five.sentenc.es - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: ppc install?
On Oct 28, 2009, at 3:04 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: It'd be nice if FUSE-unionfs was available for this. Which is the latest kernel version for YD4? (Same as COS4?) hm; it's not clear to me from a quick web search what exactly the relationship is between YDL and CentOS, so i can't speak authoritatively. these are all the versions of fuse-unionfs currently in RPMforge; are you looking for a different version/arch? i see 0.23 for el4 and el5, i386/x86_64/ppc, and 0.23 for el3 i386. -steve -- If this were played upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction. - Fabian, Twelfth Night, III,v http://five.sentenc.es PGP.sig Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [qmailtoaster] SimScan Question
Jake Vickers wrote: Bill Holt wrote: After running qtp-newmodel, simscan does not appear in email headers anymore. [r...@mail ~]# rpm -ivh /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/simscan-toaster-1.4.0-1.3.8.i386.rpm Preparing... ### [100%] package simscan-toaster-1.4.0-1.3.8.i386 is already installed 3194 ? S 0:00 svscan 3207 ? S 0:00 \_ supervise clamd 3228 ? Sl 0:02 | \_ /usr/sbin/clamd 3208 ? S 0:00 \_ supervise log simscan will not show in ps. It's called as part of qmail-smtp. You need to look at your smtp logs to see if it's showing there, and show us some email headers where you think it's not running. Showing us the smtp logs will also help. And lastly, make sure it's defined correctly in your tcp.smtp file. Show us that file if you have any questions as well. - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com Fixed tcp-smpt and got it to work. Thanks, -- bholt-netaxs.html Bill Holt Net-Axs Consulting bh...@net-axs.com "Remember, the government cannot give anything to anyone -- that they have not first taken from someone else." - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
[qmailtoaster] Re: ppc install?
Steve Huff wrote: On Oct 28, 2009, at 3:04 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: It'd be nice if FUSE-unionfs was available for this. Which is the latest kernel version for YD4? (Same as COS4?) hm; it's not clear to me from a quick web search what exactly the relationship is between YDL and CentOS, so i can't speak authoritatively. these are all the versions of fuse-unionfs currently in RPMforge; are you looking for a different version/arch? i see 0.23 for el4 and el5, i386/x86_64/ppc, and 0.23 for el3 i386. -steve I don't care about fuse-unionfs so much, as fuse-unionfs (and fuse) packages are coming from the QTP repo. I would need someone to build these packages on a ppc for the repo. CentOS 4,5 need the dkms and dkms-fuse packages as well. In my testing FC10/11 didn't need these packages. I thought that this was because of the kernel version, but I'm not so sure about now that this the reason. I'd be grateful for some enlightenment. dkms (and dkms-fuse) might be needed for YDL as well. They should be in the RF repo. -- -Eric 'shubes' - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
RE: [qmailtoaster] ppc install?
Good to know. Unfortunately, and expectedly, I cannot find yellow dog linux updates to make it current so I'm going to have to update every package the hard way without yum. If anyone knows a dependable ppc source RPM site to make this easier I'm all ears. Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:18:22 -0400 From: j...@qmailtoaster.com To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] ppc install? Donald Wheeling wrote: Hello all. I've been away for quite a while and haven't followed qmailtoaster's progress very closely. I am now getting back into it and I'd like to update a very old qmailtoaster (2004) install but I'm uncertain if the hardware is still supported. I have a ppc that I'd like to reuse for this purpose but, after a couple of days, I can't find anything that says it is still supported. In the past I remember I used to pass redhat arguments to the rpms during install but with the new OS advancements ppc support may be just a memory. Machine specs are below: Machine - PPC power tower pro OS - yellow dog linux 4.0 (redhat variant) I did find one reference to ppc in the mailing lists but it was vague. It might have been a reference to a client not the server. Any suggestions are of course welcomed. Welcome back! The build flags you used then will still work today. You will need to use the cnt40 flag for your particular case, since that will be CentOS 4 which is (almost) the same as Yellow Dog 4 (if I remember correctly), or you can use rht90 which will compile for generic Redhat 9.0. I unfortunately do not have any PPC hardware (nor even a copy of YD4!) to test on, so please post back here on any updates/progress you make.
Re: [qmailtoaster] ppc install?
A quick poke at http://rpmfind.net came up with dkms and fuse for the ppc architecture. Perhaps it will have others you seek? In the past I've had luck with rpm.pbone.net, but a scan there didn't come up with any immediately obvious candidates for ppc. Still, it may be worth some further digging. Cheers, --Craig On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 7:03 PM, Donald Wheeling donw1...@hotmail.comwrote: Good to know. Unfortunately, and expectedly, I cannot find yellow dog linux updates to make it current so I'm going to have to update every package the hard way without yum. If anyone knows a dependable ppc source RPM site to make this easier I'm all ears. -- Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:18:22 -0400 From: j...@qmailtoaster.com To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] ppc install? Donald Wheeling wrote: Hello all. I've been away for quite a while and haven't followed qmailtoaster's progress very closely. I am now getting back into it and I'd like to update a very old qmailtoaster (2004) install but I'm uncertain if the hardware is still supported. I have a ppc that I'd like to reuse for this purpose but, after a couple of days, I can't find anything that says it is still supported. In the past I remember I used to pass redhat arguments to the rpms during install but with the new OS advancements ppc support may be just a memory. Machine specs are below: Machine - PPC power tower pro OS - yellow dog linux 4.0 (redhat variant) I did find one reference to ppc in the mailing lists but it was vague. It might have been a reference to a client not the server. Any suggestions are of course welcomed. Welcome back! The build flags you used then will still work today. You will need to use the cnt40 flag for your particular case, since that will be CentOS 4 which is (almost) the same as Yellow Dog 4 (if I remember correctly), or you can use rht90 which will compile for generic Redhat 9.0. I unfortunately do not have any PPC hardware (nor even a copy of YD4!) to test on, so please post back here on any updates/progress you make.
[qmailtoaster] Server Mail
To All, I now have in place three Qmail Toaster Servers in three different locations. These servers are part of individual networks, or whish there are other CentOS and RedHat servers. I am having issues with mail from the other servers as these are running Sendmail by default. The problem lies in the fact that I can send messages from the Sendmail servers to the Toasters Servers, as long as they are within the same network and they are not an alias/forward account. The real issue is CHKUSER does its job too well and it rejects messages from the Sendmail servers, if it's to be sent to another account or network. This is the type of error I get... @40004ae9186406b54edc CHKUSER rejected sender: from r...@backup.mydomain.com:: remote backup.mydomain.com:unknown:77.60.23.95 rcpt : invalid sender MX domain I understand that there are issues with servers that are not really configured as a full Mail server, but what can I do to rectify this error. Can someone please let me know what I need to do to the sendmail.cf file to get around this. Or what needs to be done to the Qmail Toaster settings to allow the incorrect MX issue. Cheers Mike Canty - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
RE: [qmailtoaster] forward email tagged as SPAM
Hi all, Any one can help me with this issue .. _ From: Hajid [mailto:ha...@masolusi.com] Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 10:51 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: [qmailtoaster] forward email tagged as SPAM How to forward email that was tagged SPAM to specific account. Email with subject ***SPAM*** will going to s...@domain.com At my qmailtoaster there is mailfilter. Please guide me for it. I still looking archive at milist for this issue .
Re: [qmailtoaster] Server Mail
Mike, I am not 100% sure, but I think you can put the MX address in the host file of the server that is rejecting the mail because of an invalid sender MX domain. I am pretty sure it's because it can't resolve the address. Host file entry snip 77.60.23.95 backup.mydmain.com /snip or you may be able to add an entry in the local domain file. I believe either solution will work. Hopefully someone else can chime in to confirm. I don't think the rcpt host file allows ip addresses. CJ Mike Canty wrote: To All, I now have in place three Qmail Toaster Servers in three different locations. These servers are part of individual networks, or whish there are other CentOS and RedHat servers. I am having issues with mail from the other servers as these are running Sendmail by default. The problem lies in the fact that I can send messages from the Sendmail servers to the Toasters Servers, as long as they are within the same network and they are not an alias/forward account. The real issue is CHKUSER does its job too well and it rejects messages from the Sendmail servers, if it's to be sent to another account or network. This is the type of error I get... @40004ae9186406b54edc CHKUSER rejected sender: from r...@backup.mydomain.com:: remote backup.mydomain.com:unknown:77.60.23.95 rcpt : invalid sender MX domain I understand that there are issues with servers that are not really configured as a full Mail server, but what can I do to rectify this error. Can someone please let me know what I need to do to the sendmail.cf file to get around this. Or what needs to be done to the Qmail Toaster settings to allow the incorrect MX issue. Cheers Mike Canty - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com -- Cecil Yother, Jr. cj cj's 2318 Clement Ave Alameda, CA 94501 tel 510.865.2787 | fax 510.864.7300 http://yother.com - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
