Re: [qmailtoaster] reason: 554 : Relay access denied / Returned mail: see transcript for details

[Erik Espinoza]

Set up MX records.



On 1/17/07, Harry Zink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


At this point, this problem is really paralizing, so I implore anyone for
some help and assistance.

Okay, this is a repeat, and a renewed effort to try to get to the bottom of
this - I am starting to believe that there is something screwed up on my
qmail toaster, as this odd behavior seems to have started around the same
time I performed the last update - but that's speculation.

Anyway, here's the scenario:

QmailToaster installed on a Centos 4.4 box (frequently updated via yum)

Pre-existing accounts work just fine.

When creating a new domain (either via vqadmin, or vadddomain), and
subsequently setting up new accounts using qmailadmin, the error below
happens every single time when someone tries to send mail *TO* those
accounts.

Anyone else on the same server can send and receive mail from those
accounts.

Someone from an outside server, say Yahoo, dot-mac, or gmail, for example,
will get the error message below back, claiming inability to deliver.

Other domains and accounts on that same server, that existed previously,
work just fine. Only new domains and accounts act that way.

Essentially, it acts as if someone tried to relay through it, but in fact,
how would that pop up if one is just sending mail, simply, from an outside
account?

Only additional piece of that puzzle might be that this is a separate mail
server box, from the domain's web-server, and DNS server. Within the DNS
record, it simply points properly to the IP of the web-server, and the one
from the mail server - just as the others are doing. Is there something in
DNS I should be checking out?

Anyway, from Yahoo.com sent mail gets the error message below:

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
216.193.231.146 does not like recipient.
Remote host said: 554 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Relay access
denied
Giving up on 216.193.231.146.

All other accounts get the error message as follows:


Begin forwarded message:

From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: January 17, 2007 11:30:23 PM PST
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details


The original message was received at Wed, 17 Jan 2007 23:30:23 -0800 (PST)
from smtpin05-en2 [10.13.10.150]

   - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(reason: 554 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Relay access denied)

   - Transcript of session follows -
... while talking to realasia-services.com.:

DATA
<<< 554 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Relay access denied
554 5.0.0 Service unavailable
<<< 554 Error: no valid recipients
Reporting-MTA: dns; smtpout.mac.com
Received-From-MTA: DNS; smtpin05-en2
Arrival-Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 23:30:23 -0800 (PST)

Final-Recipient: RFC822; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Action: failed
Status: 5.0.0
Remote-MTA: DNS; realasia-services.com
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 554 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Relay access
denied
Last-Attempt-Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 23:30:23 -0800 (PST)

From: Harry Zink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: January 17, 2007 11:30:20 PM PST
To: "Dr. Harald K. Zink" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: new test (from mac.com)










-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] Should I use qmail toaster?

[Erik Espinoza]

For that we have the QmailToaster Virtual Appliance for VMware
Server/Player/Workstation.

:)

Erik

On 1/17/07, Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi Erik,

>
> We're here about the QmailToaster Project. Don't get
> me wrong, this
> community always goes above and beyond to help out a
> straggled user,
> but come on . . .
>
> My apologies if anyone is offended.
>

No offense taken

The impressive amount of customization and packaging
effort that has been put into QmailToaster project
solves some of the biggest problems that a new
sysadmin would face in setting up an email server.

As you rightly point out, much of remaining points are
not at all about qmail.

This project almost provides a "turn-key  solution"
that even the most harried office administrator could
use to set up a small email server.

The suggestions, if implemented, would simply move the
project further down the "appliance" path.

-- David





Sucker-punch spam with award-winning protection.
Try the free Yahoo! Mail Beta.
http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/features_spam.html

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] Should I use qmail toaster?

[Erik Espinoza]

Hi Dave,

There are projects about Network ACL's (IPTables), System backups
(Amanda), Daemon Lockdowns (Bastille) and so on. In addition there are
plenty of books on the subject matter. That said I mean absolutely no
offense to anyone by this next comment. This community isn't here to
teach you (or anyone) how to be a network and system admin.

We're here about the QmailToaster Project. Don't get me wrong, this
community always goes above and beyond to help out a straggled user,
but come on . . .

My apologies if anyone is offended.

Thanks,
Erik


Here are some things that come to mind, but I am sure
you folks can think of much more:

- Network ACL's
- System backups
- User data and config backups
- Daemon lockdown
- Removal of unneeded services
- Auto-updates of anything possible. (Think
Apache/PHP/SSH/etc... or, even more important,
SquirrelMail.)
- Basic health reporting / stats to someone.


-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Accepting mail from local mail servers

[Erik Espinoza]

Question is, why is the toaster at company.com rejecting the message? I'm
not quite sure. A look at /var/log/qmail/smtp/current on the toaster should
tell. I'm curious to know exactly why the message is failing (I'm still
learning this stuff too!). In any case, the changes to tcp.smtp should give
a "green light" (open relay) for any session coming from the specified address.



I'd wager that the relay was denied because the internal machines
hostnames aren't resolve-able in DNS on the real Internet.

Suppose my public internet is kabewm.com and my internal
infrastructure runs on internal.kabewm.com. Since my public DNS
records don't have any A, MX or other entries for internal.kabewm.com,
then the QmailToaster will reject e-mail coming from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] since it couldn't possibly be a real return
e-mail.

By the way, my blog is http://www.kabewm.com/ and
contains info on things going on with QmailToaster. :)

Erik

-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] tcpserver-limits-patch

[Erik Espinoza]

Hey JP,

Please ensure that the patch defaults to the original behavior of the
QmailToaster if no settings are added to the tcp.smtp. I don't want to
accept a patch that changes the default behavior of the default
install.

Thanks,
Erik

On 1/17/07, Jean-Paul van de Plasse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I could not agree more on this.
Will do this today!

JP
- Original Message -
From: "Eric "Shubes"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 12:24 AM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] tcpserver-limits-patch


> While doing this w/ iptables is certainly doable, I'd like to see a simple
> way of handling it with the toaster too. The patch would be nice (imho).
>
> Philip Nix Guru wrote:
>> Hi JP
>> I was just thinking in a general setup.
>> Not everyone knows how to set iptables.
>> And I often see spammers connecting to some of my smtps with 30-40
>> connections (at least trying ..) :)
>> that would easily get your server down for your customers, the max
>> concurrencyincoming wont allow any new connections
>>
>> I use that kind of template (you can easily add -s and -d to filter)
>> iptables -I INETIN -p tcp --dport 25 -i eth1 -m state --state NEW -m
>> recent --set
>> iptables -I INETIN -p tcp --dport 25 -i eth1 -m state --state NEW -m
>> recent --update --seconds 60 --hitcount 10 -j DROP
>>
>> QToaster should add either the option through tcp.smtp or some basic
>> iptables rules
>> it would help a few users I think. Too often you see 30-100 connections
>> from the same source and that just blocks your server for your "real"
>> users
>>
>> Just an idea :)
>> Jean-Paul van de Plasse wrote:
>>> Hi Philip,
>>>
>>> Just curious but what good does it do when you can allready do this
>>> with iptables?
>>> When I changed ucspi-tcp-toaster last week I figured they  were not
>>> very usefull..
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> JP
>>>
>>> - Original Message - From: "Philip Nix Guru" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> To: 
>>> Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 10:24 PM
>>> Subject: [qmailtoaster] tcpserver-limits-patch
>>>
>>>
 Hello EE
 would it be possible to integrate the tcpserver-limits-patch into the
 ucspi-tcp-toaster ?
 It is pretty useful to have MAXLOAD MAXCONNIP MAXCONNC & DIEMSG in
 the tcp.smtp cdb file

 I am already doing that trough my iptables setup but it could be useful
 Thx
 -Philip

>
>
> --
> -Eric 'shubes'
>
> -
> QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] smtproutes and domainkeys, spf, srs

[Erik Espinoza]

SPF will not work in this case. Reread my earlier email. Yahoo doesn't
publish records for one to include. In addition DK usually fails when
you use a smarthost.

On 1/17/07, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Trung,
Is your toaster on a dynamic or static IP address?

Trung Pham wrote:
> So in my case, I am forwarding my mail through Yahoo. I should not bother
> setting up SPF, SRS, and Domainkeys since I won't see any benefit at all.
>
> Supposed if I handle my own outbound email and setup all those features
> properly. Do you think Yahoo will still put my mails in the Bulk folder?

TTBOMK, yahoo will not put your mail in bulk folders if you have DK
configured properly.

> Another question, is it necessary for us to setup reverse IP DNS? Because
> I think SBC will not help me do it.
>
>> SRS and SPF can be used if your upstream isp publishes spf records.
>> You can use the include statement (more info at openspf.org) to
>> include their spf entries into your spf records. SBC, however, doesn't
>> publish SPF records as Yahoo handles their infrastructure.
>>
>> The Qmail DomainKey implementation is to spec, but doesn't implement
>> the optional "h=" header that limits the scope of the DomainKey
>> signature to certain parts. Because of this, DomainKeys will fail if
>> it is forwarded through a third party server.
>>
>> Erik
>>
>> On 1/16/07, Trung Pham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I currently have all my outgoing emails forwarded to my ISP server using
>>> smtproutes. So I am curious if I can still use domainkeys, spf, or srs
>>> features since my ISP will definitely modify the email header.
>>>
>>> FYI, I am using SBC Business DSL. I had to resolve to smtproutes
>>> otherwise
>>> Yahoo will put emails coming from me into the bulk folder.
>>>
>>> Please let me know if those features still work if I use my ISP to relay
>>> my mails.
>>>
>>> My goal is to stop incoming spams that forge my own address.
>>>
>>>
>>>


--
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Accepting mail from local mail servers

[Erik Espinoza]

ES,

Only udp and icmp connections can be spoofed. The tcp handshake makes
spoofing tcp impossible.

The only way for such an attach to be feasible would be to hack a few
different routers in between their link. At that point, they got
bigger problems than an open relya.

Erik

On 1/17/07, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

What JP says would certainly help.

Given what you *have* said though, and making a few presumptions, I might
have a fix for you. Since your internal machines are being nat'd, I'm
thinking that the smtp sessions for these will appear to the toaster to be
coming from the external address of the natting device.

Simply add that address (the external address of your natting device) to
/etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp file like so:
external.address.of.nat:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
Regenerate your cdb file:
# qmailctl cdb
and you should be good to go.

Note, this solution is a tad bit insecure. If someone were able to spoof
this address (while unlikely it *is* possible), they could use your toaster
as an open relay. Not much of an issue if it's a private address, somewhat
more so if it's public. The best solution, while not as easy but more
secure, would be to configure the sendmail clients to authenticate themselves.

Jean-Paul van de Plasse wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Any messages in the logfiles (on both qmailtoaster server and
> development machines)
> What do you get when you telnet from the development machine to the
> qmailtoaster on port 25 and type something like
> helo
> mail from:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> rcpt to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> data
> subject: test
> test
> .
>
> Simply said, more info is needed to solve this for you.
>
> Regards,
>
> JP
>
> - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 
> Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 8:29 PM
> Subject: [qmailtoaster] Re: Accepting mail from local mail servers
>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am not sure what the problem is and how to resolve it. I am hosting my
>> company qmailtoaster server in the datacenter on an external ip, I also
>> have some development machines inside the company behind the nat on
>> internal ips.
>>
>> When an internal application sends email out to [EMAIL PROTECTED] using
>> sendmail on localhost, I am not getting that email at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> I am pretty sure qmail rejects these emails because they come from a
>> mailserver behind nat which doesnt resolve to anything.
>>
>> What do I need to configure on qmailtoaster so I can allow my development
>> machines to send me email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is there a setting where I
>> can just specify my company external ip to allow all the mail from my
>> internal subnet without being rejected?
>>
>> Thank you
>>


--
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Accepting mail from local mail servers

[Erik Espinoza]

My mistake, that is SENDER_NO_CHECK="" and RELAYCLIENT=""

On 1/17/07, Erik Espinoza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

You can disable sender checking by adding the nat public IP to
tcp.smtp with the RELAYCLIENT option

On 1/17/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am not sure what the problem is and how to resolve it. I am hosting my
> company qmailtoaster server in the datacenter on an external ip, I also
> have some development machines inside the company behind the nat on
> internal ips.
>
> When an internal application sends email out to [EMAIL PROTECTED] using
> sendmail on localhost, I am not getting that email at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I am pretty sure qmail rejects these emails because they come from a
> mailserver behind nat which doesnt resolve to anything.
>
> What do I need to configure on qmailtoaster so I can allow my development
> machines to send me email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is there a setting where I
> can just specify my company external ip to allow all the mail from my
> internal subnet without being rejected?
>
> Thank you
>
>
> -
>  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>



-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Accepting mail from local mail servers

[Erik Espinoza]

You can disable sender checking by adding the nat public IP to
tcp.smtp with the RELAYCLIENT option

On 1/17/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi,

I am not sure what the problem is and how to resolve it. I am hosting my
company qmailtoaster server in the datacenter on an external ip, I also
have some development machines inside the company behind the nat on
internal ips.

When an internal application sends email out to [EMAIL PROTECTED] using
sendmail on localhost, I am not getting that email at [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I am pretty sure qmail rejects these emails because they come from a
mailserver behind nat which doesnt resolve to anything.

What do I need to configure on qmailtoaster so I can allow my development
machines to send me email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is there a setting where I
can just specify my company external ip to allow all the mail from my
internal subnet without being rejected?

Thank you


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] compile errors

[Erik Espinoza]

yum install libtool-ltdl libtool-ltdl-devel

Try again.

Erik

On 1/17/07, Kisakye Alex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:





Hello



1)I have been trying to install Toaster on Fedora Core 5! I have been
getting the error below during installation! can any one point me in the
right direction??



2) There was a post earlier on the list on problems experienced while
installing toaster on CentOS server install, was this erectified?? ie can I
move my installation to CentOS?? I have just had enough with Fedora Core



Errors below;



Installing courier-authlib-toaster-0.59-1.3.4.src.rpm

error: Failed build dependencies

  /usr/include/ltdl.h is needed by
courier-authlib-toaster-0.59-1.3.4.i386

error: File not found by glob:

/usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/courier-authlib-toaster*.rpm



Installing courier-imap-toaster-4.1.2-1.3.6.src.rpm

error: Failed build dependencies

  courier-authlib-toaster is needed by
courier-imap-toaster-4.1.2-1.3.6.i386



error: File not found by glob:

/usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/courier-imap-toaster*.rpm





thanks

ALex




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] Should I use qmail toaster?

[Erik Espinoza]

Might want to check out the wiki. There are a ton of scripts that you
can use to keep the QT up to date.

ES and JV have done some great work on keeping the QmailToaster up to
date. Due to licensing restrictions, we aren't allowed to give out
binary updates, so no yum.

The wiki has an faq entry on this.

Thanks,
Erik

On 1/16/07, Dave Q.T. Newbiw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi Erik,

Thanks for the reply...   What size VM, memory-wise, does QM Toaster need?
Is 96MB enough?

In anticipation of the fact the that over the next few years _some_
bug/security issues will be found, how exactly does the auto update process
work? Is everything updated, or just the base CentOS files?

Thank you,
David



Erik Espinoza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
 Hello Dave

> Can QM Toaster be used to turn a default CentOS install into a very basic
> POP3/IMAP/SMTP email server?

It's a lot more than basic, as it comes with antivirus, antispam,
domainkeys, spf and srs. I'd call it thorough rather than basic.

> Our current ISP where we host ~15 domains and ~25+ email accounts has a
> mandatory incoming "auto-discard" spam filter that is far too strict to
> continue using.

That sucks.

> Unfortunately, switching ISPs is not an option right now.

Good luck!

> I am looking at signing up for a basic low-memory CentOS "Virtual
Dedicated
> Server" to handle our own incoming (& outgoing) mail.

I wouldn't go too low on the memory unless you don't want antivirus
and antispam.

> There will not be a full-time IT person to maintain the server, so
> simplicity is a must.

The QmailToaster is very simple. This is a no brainer.

> I am perfectly fine with leaving out server-side spam filtering, though I
> suspect that some basic blacklist usage would be a good idea.

I'd recommend against leaving out the spam filtering, as blacklists
are usually too encompassing.

> Most specifically, I don't want to add the performance overhead, security
> liability, and maintenance requirements of a typical "default" server.
> (Apache, MySQL, Bind, etc.)

In reality, the only thing that requires maintenance is the antispam,
antivirus and webmail.The project keeps those all up to date. The rest
is, for the most part, already a couple of years old and battle tested
on the internet. Known to be secure.

> Basically, I want an ultra-basic server that I can set for automatic
updates
> and let it continue running "hands-off" until CentOS 4 is no longer
> supported with security patches.

Sounds like the plan. It's how I run mine.

> Will Qmail Toaster do what I need?

Yes. It's not basic, but it is simple. And there is plenty of support
here, on the wiki and on the main site.

Thanks,
Erik

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




 
Don't be flakey. Get Yahoo! Mail for Mobile and
always stay connected to friends.




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] smtproutes and domainkeys, spf, srs

[Erik Espinoza]

SRS and SPF can be used if your upstream isp publishes spf records.
You can use the include statement (more info at openspf.org) to
include their spf entries into your spf records. SBC, however, doesn't
publish SPF records as Yahoo handles their infrastructure.

The Qmail DomainKey implementation is to spec, but doesn't implement
the optional "h=" header that limits the scope of the DomainKey
signature to certain parts. Because of this, DomainKeys will fail if
it is forwarded through a third party server.

Erik

On 1/16/07, Trung Pham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I currently have all my outgoing emails forwarded to my ISP server using
smtproutes. So I am curious if I can still use domainkeys, spf, or srs
features since my ISP will definitely modify the email header.

FYI, I am using SBC Business DSL. I had to resolve to smtproutes otherwise
Yahoo will put emails coming from me into the bulk folder.

Please let me know if those features still work if I use my ISP to relay
my mails.

My goal is to stop incoming spams that forge my own address.



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Fw: [qmailtoaster] UPDATED PACKAGE: libsrs2-toaster

[Erik Espinoza]

There is no separate tcp.smtp. The new MSA just requires
authentication for relay.

Erik

On 1/16/07, George Sweetnam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



>> - submission port 587

>The latest qmail-toaster package has a separate smtp process listening on
>port 587 which acts as a MailSubmissionAgent. This can be used to allow
>users who would otherwise be blacklisted to submit email, as this MSA does
>not check blacklists, but requires authentication.

Where is the tcp.smtp file for the new smtp process found?  The existing one
is in /etc/tcprules.d/

I'll guess it has something like this in it (but uses the new auth process):
:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""

George


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] smtproutes and domainkeys, spf, srs

[Erik Espinoza]

Most (all?) isps should be adding received headers, which should break
the signature. This is because the DK implementation written for Qmail
ignores an optional part of the spec that can be used to sign only
certain headers and the message.

Can you send an e-mail to me offlist? I want to take a quick look at
your headers.

Thanks,
Erik

On 1/16/07, Vince Callaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 21:10 -0500, slamp slamp wrote:
> How did you get domainkeys working in this setup?? When I set my
> domainkeys awhile ago, gmail or yahoo always said bad keys. and I was
> told here on the list that it wont work because the headers are
> changed/updated by the smtp server in smtproute.

Only if your ISP changes your message.

You can use this link: http://senderid.espcoalition.org/ to test your
domainkeys.  It is an auto-responder that sends back a report on your
message.  Pretty good debugging info.

I also have accounts at gmail and yahoo.  I sent messages to those and
domainkey status was always good.

Mailing lists are what breaks domainkeys.  They like to add little
things to the bottom of the message.  I have an entry in my tcp.smtp
file for each of the mailing list servers I use.  Those entries bypass
domainkey checks.  I found I was bouncing a lot of messages, especially
from this list because of domainkey failures.




-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[qmailtoaster] devel merging to main

[Erik Espinoza]

Greetings,

On Friday I will be merging the devel to the mainstream. If anyone has
any reports to make, any issues with the devel packages, now is the
time to report it.

Thanks,
Erik

-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] qmailctl queue and GMT

[Erik Espinoza]

http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Main_Page#QmailToaster-Plus

On 1/16/07, Dan Herbon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hrm, sorry I am not familiar what qmailtoaster-plus. Where can I get it at?

Thanks

-Original Message-
From: Eric "Shubes" [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 1:00 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] qmailctl queue and GMT

Dan Herbon wrote:
> Anyway to have qmailctl queue command display the information in another
> time zone? The logs are all in EST as well as my system time. Anyone
> have any idea?
>
>
>
> Dan Herbon
>

I don't know.
That being said, have you tried out qmHandle and/or qmqtool? (They're
included in qmailtoaster-plus)

--
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] Internal Server Error when using vqadmin

[Erik Espinoza]

More info would be nice.

Apache error logs and so forth would be helpful.

What distribution are you using?

What QmailToaster packages are installed?

Why are you building your own apache? Was it always a custom apache,
or did you try using this with the built in apache?



On 1/16/07, Robert Giddings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi Guys,

I keep getting Internal Server Error's when using vqadmin, for example when
wanting to view users or add a domain etc.
I have already disabled selinux as that was coursing some problems before,
when accessing vqadmin from the toaster index. I have now also recompiled
apache so as to change the docroot of suexec to /usr/share/toaster and have
added a .htaccess file, and edited toaster.conf in line with the install
instructions on the vqadmin website, but none of these seem to have worked.
Does anyone have any other suggestions?

Thanks,

Robert Giddings


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] Off Topic

[Erik Espinoza]

Disk space is cheap these days. You may just want to get a 250gb for a
hundred bucks and save yourself the time and aggravation. :)

Erik

On 1/16/07, Jake Vickers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Ronnie Tartar wrote:
> I don't think that will be a problem, this will be a dedicated machine
> to route all incoming faxes (tiff) attachements and voicemail (mp3)
> attachements through it to the mail server.
>
>
> - Original Message - From: "Jake Vickers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 
> Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 3:34 PM
> Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Off Topic
>
>
>> Ronnie Tartar wrote:
>>> I need to create an SMTP gateway that will take attachments, wav and
>>> tiff and convert them to mp3 and (jpeg or pdf).  Any ideas on how to
>>> start this?
>>>
>>> I hate storing wave files on mail server and faxes in tiff format.
>>> too much space.
>>>
>> That gets rather complicated. Attachments are stored as MIME type in
>> the email themselves, so you'd need to use something like ripmime to
>> extract the attachment, and then run a script on it to do your
>> conversions, and then put the NEW attachment back into the email
>> (which will probably break SPF).
>>
Just some coding involved. The messages are saved in Maildir format
under /home/vpopmail/domains/yourdomain.com/youruser/Maildir/new/blahblah
You'd write a script to watch for these files (or process them in a
batch every couple hours), rip the MIMNE out of the message, pipe it
into lame or whatever (you'd also have to write some conditionals into
the script to look for specific MIME types), then put the mp3 back in
the MIME section of the message. I can think of how to do the first
couple parts, but putting it back into the email is something I can't
think of at this time. May hit me later.





-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] apostrophe

[Erik Espinoza]

Not sure. Just remember that Qmail's security comes from the foresight
of DJB. I don't have that kind of foresight, therefore I tend to rely
on certain defaults from his era and adjust according to the times.

For example, the + and & and a few other characters are now used in
mailing lists, so the QmailToaster now allows them.

I'd prefer this method as it's default deny, and allowing what is
needed. We all know how default allow always turns out.

Erik

On 1/16/07, Tim Mancour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Erik,

Which characters in the sender's mailbox identifier represent a security
issue? In my thinking these should be the only characters that are
restricted in the "C" code. The badmailfrom file can then be used to allow
site to site customization.

I know that everytime that I upgrade I have to do the hand building step to
allow the '+' character and would really like to be able to configure thus
sort of thing in a control file.

Regards,
Tim

-Original Message-
From: Erik Espinoza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 8:09 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] apostrophe

Tim,

Not a good idea. If you write this patch, it shall not be included into the
Toaster.

Qmail gets a lot of security by not allowing certain characters. For
example, any e-mail address that contains a "." is stored in the file system
as a ":" because the period is a file system navigation character.

Thanks,
Erik

On 1/15/07, Tim Mancour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The toaster seems to be more restrictive than the current SMTP
> specification. RFC 2821 (page 37) only specifically prohibts ASCII
> characters 0 through 31 and characters greater than 126 from the name
> of a mailbox.
>
> As a long term solution, couldn't we modify the "C" code (specifically
> the function check_sender_address_format) to allow any character in
> the ASCII range 33 through 126. We could then use the badmailfrom
> control file to filter out sender addresses that contain characters
> that are undesirable. A single line with an explicit set of characters
> could be used - e.g. [ ,;:"'`&%\$\^\{\[\(\|\)\]\}\*\+\?\\].
>
> I could be missing something but I think that this will allow each
> site to customize as required without rebuilding the "C" code and
> without losing any functionality. I'd be happy to make the C code
> changes if this make sense to everyone.
>
> Regards,
> Tim
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Trung Pham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 5:14 PM
> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
> Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] apostrophe
>
> Yeah, you will need to edit the C code before compiling it.
>
> > eh no..
> > Its just that to change qmailtoaster/checkuser you have to change
> > the code a bit.
> >
> > Like Eric explained below.
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Dan Herbon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: 
> > Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 10:48 PM
> > Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] apostrophe
> >
> >
> >> So I have to have any user emailing this person to add a \ in front
> >> of the email address?:
> >>
> >> Bd\'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Trung Pham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 4:37 PM
> >> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
> >> Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] apostrophe
> >>
> >> #define CHKUSER_ALLOW_SENDER_CHAR_2 '\''
> >> that's the correct syntax
> >>
> >>> Dan Herbon wrote:
> >>>> I've been live on the new qmailtoaster server now for about 3
> >>>> weeks and no problems have arisen, everythings been great.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Today however I came across my first problem. A user we used to
> >>>> email back and forth has an apostrophe in her name and for some
> >>>> strange odd reason whoever set this person up put the apostrophe
> >>>> in her
> email
> >>>> address. So her email address is:   bd'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> The qmail server is rejecting this with:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> 
> >>>>
> >>>> 2007-01-12 15:09:52.456145500 CHKUSER rejected sender: from
> >>>>  remote
> >

Re: [qmailtoaster] apostrophe

[Erik Espinoza]

I'd be okay with that.

On 1/16/07, Jean-Paul van de Plasse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I think that making this a runtime configurable option is the best option.
Not that much of a problem to implement, and when we default it to the same
behaviour it has now it is up to the admins what they do with it.

Can you find yourself in that Erik?

JP
- Original Message -
From: "Tim Mancour" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 5:15 PM
Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] apostrophe


> Erik,
>
> Which characters in the sender's mailbox identifier represent a security
> issue? In my thinking these should be the only characters that are
> restricted in the "C" code. The badmailfrom file can then be used to allow
> site to site customization.
>
> I know that everytime that I upgrade I have to do the hand building step
> to
> allow the '+' character and would really like to be able to configure thus
> sort of thing in a control file.
>
> Regards,
> Tim
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Espinoza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 8:09 PM
> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
> Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] apostrophe
>
> Tim,
>
> Not a good idea. If you write this patch, it shall not be included into
> the
> Toaster.
>
> Qmail gets a lot of security by not allowing certain characters. For
> example, any e-mail address that contains a "." is stored in the file
> system
> as a ":" because the period is a file system navigation character.
>
> Thanks,
> Erik
>
> On 1/15/07, Tim Mancour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The toaster seems to be more restrictive than the current SMTP
>> specification. RFC 2821 (page 37) only specifically prohibts ASCII
>> characters 0 through 31 and characters greater than 126 from the name
>> of a mailbox.
>>
>> As a long term solution, couldn't we modify the "C" code (specifically
>> the function check_sender_address_format) to allow any character in
>> the ASCII range 33 through 126. We could then use the badmailfrom
>> control file to filter out sender addresses that contain characters
>> that are undesirable. A single line with an explicit set of characters
>> could be used - e.g. [ ,;:"'`&%\$\^\{\[\(\|\)\]\}\*\+\?\\].
>>
>> I could be missing something but I think that this will allow each
>> site to customize as required without rebuilding the "C" code and
>> without losing any functionality. I'd be happy to make the C code
>> changes if this make sense to everyone.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Tim
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Trung Pham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 5:14 PM
>> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
>> Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] apostrophe
>>
>> Yeah, you will need to edit the C code before compiling it.
>>
>> > eh no..
>> > Its just that to change qmailtoaster/checkuser you have to change
>> > the code a bit.
>> >
>> > Like Eric explained below.
>> >
>> >
>> > - Original Message -
>> > From: "Dan Herbon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > To: 
>> > Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 10:48 PM
>> > Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] apostrophe
>> >
>> >
>> >> So I have to have any user emailing this person to add a \ in front
>> >> of the email address?:
>> >>
>> >> Bd\'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> -Original Message-
>> >> From: Trung Pham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 4:37 PM
>> >> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
>> >> Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] apostrophe
>> >>
>> >> #define CHKUSER_ALLOW_SENDER_CHAR_2 '\''
>> >> that's the correct syntax
>> >>
>> >>> Dan Herbon wrote:
>> >>>> I've been live on the new qmailtoaster server now for about 3
>> >>>> weeks and no problems have arisen, everythings been great.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Today however I came across my first problem. A user we used to
>> >>>> email back and forth has an apostrophe in her name and for some
>> >>>> strange odd reason whoever set this person up put the apostrophe
>> >>>> in her
>> email
>> &

Re: [qmailtoaster] djbdns and domain keys

[Erik Espinoza]

I believe It should be noted that djbdns can't be both authoratative
and caching (recursive) at the same time.

Sanchez will correct me if I'm wrong. ;)

On 1/16/07, Vince Callaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 08:12 -0800, Ed Morrison wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> I'm trying to setup djbdns with domain keys for my server using these
> instructions from the wiki:
>
>  DJBDNS - in /var/djbdns/tinydns/root/data (make from your-domain-dk.txt):
>
>'_domainkey.your-domain.com:o=-; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>'private._domainkey.your-domain.com:k=rsa; p=MEwwDQY . . . to end of 
key
>
>
> Has the new toaster changed so these instructions no longer apply?  The
> directory tinydns/root/data does not exist on my install.  Am I missing
> something obvious?

These instructions apply if your mail server is ALSO your authoritive
DNS server.  The mail servers public key record has to be part of your
public DNS.

If you installed the caching nameserver you will not have the
tinydns/root/data folder.  That is fine if your mailserver is NOT your
authoritive name server.


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] apostrophe

[Erik Espinoza]

The + has been allowed for some time in the default toaster.

On 1/16/07, Tim Mancour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Erik,

Which characters in the sender's mailbox identifier represent a security
issue? In my thinking these should be the only characters that are
restricted in the "C" code. The badmailfrom file can then be used to allow
site to site customization.

I know that everytime that I upgrade I have to do the hand building step to
allow the '+' character and would really like to be able to configure thus
sort of thing in a control file.

Regards,
Tim

-----Original Message-
From: Erik Espinoza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 8:09 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] apostrophe

Tim,

Not a good idea. If you write this patch, it shall not be included into the
Toaster.

Qmail gets a lot of security by not allowing certain characters. For
example, any e-mail address that contains a "." is stored in the file system
as a ":" because the period is a file system navigation character.

Thanks,
Erik

On 1/15/07, Tim Mancour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The toaster seems to be more restrictive than the current SMTP
> specification. RFC 2821 (page 37) only specifically prohibts ASCII
> characters 0 through 31 and characters greater than 126 from the name
> of a mailbox.
>
> As a long term solution, couldn't we modify the "C" code (specifically
> the function check_sender_address_format) to allow any character in
> the ASCII range 33 through 126. We could then use the badmailfrom
> control file to filter out sender addresses that contain characters
> that are undesirable. A single line with an explicit set of characters
> could be used - e.g. [ ,;:"'`&%\$\^\{\[\(\|\)\]\}\*\+\?\\].
>
> I could be missing something but I think that this will allow each
> site to customize as required without rebuilding the "C" code and
> without losing any functionality. I'd be happy to make the C code
> changes if this make sense to everyone.
>
> Regards,
> Tim
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Trung Pham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 5:14 PM
> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
> Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] apostrophe
>
> Yeah, you will need to edit the C code before compiling it.
>
> > eh no..
> > Its just that to change qmailtoaster/checkuser you have to change
> > the code a bit.
> >
> > Like Eric explained below.
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Dan Herbon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: 
> > Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 10:48 PM
> > Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] apostrophe
> >
> >
> >> So I have to have any user emailing this person to add a \ in front
> >> of the email address?:
> >>
> >> Bd\'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Trung Pham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 4:37 PM
> >> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
> >> Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] apostrophe
> >>
> >> #define CHKUSER_ALLOW_SENDER_CHAR_2 '\''
> >> that's the correct syntax
> >>
> >>> Dan Herbon wrote:
> >>>> I've been live on the new qmailtoaster server now for about 3
> >>>> weeks and no problems have arisen, everythings been great.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Today however I came across my first problem. A user we used to
> >>>> email back and forth has an apostrophe in her name and for some
> >>>> strange odd reason whoever set this person up put the apostrophe
> >>>> in her
> email
> >>>> address. So her email address is:   bd'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> The qmail server is rejecting this with:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> 
> >>>>
> >>>> 2007-01-12 15:09:52.456145500 CHKUSER rejected sender: from
> >>>>  remote
> >>>>  rcpt <> : invalid sender
> >>>> address format
> >>>>
> >>>> -
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Is there an easy way to allow an apostrophe in the email address
> >>>> be delivered? Perhaps add just this users email address to some
> >>>> sort of whitelist somewhere. A

Re: [qmailtoaster] Greylisting

[Erik Espinoza]

You may want to check this out:

http://thomas.mangin.me.uk/software/qmail-greylist.html

Install instructions are simple:
cd /var/qmail/bin ; wget http://thomas.mangin.me.uk/data/source/greyd
; chmod +x greyd
mkdir /var/qmail/grey ; chown vpopmail.vchkpw /var/qmail/grey

Add ',GREY=""' to the :allow statement at the bottom of /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp

Then change /var/qmail/supervise/smtp/run to look like this:
#!/bin/sh
QMAILDUID=`id -u vpopmail`
NOFILESGID=`id -g vpopmail`
MAXSMTPD=`cat /var/qmail/control/concurrencyincoming`
BLACKLIST=`cat /var/qmail/control/blacklists`
SMTPD="/var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd"
GREYD="/var/qmail/bin/greyd"
TCP_CDB="/etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp.cdb"
RBLSMTPD="/usr/bin/rblsmtpd"
HOSTNAME=`hostname`
VCHKPW="/home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw"

exec /usr/bin/softlimit -m 1200 \
/usr/bin/tcpserver -v -R -H -l $HOSTNAME -x $TCP_CDB -c "$MAXSMTPD" \
-u "$QMAILDUID" -g "$NOFILESGID" 0 smtp \
$GREYD $RBLSMTPD $BLACKLIST $SMTPD $VCHKPW /bin/true 2>&1

On 1/16/07, Wojciech Gabor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I plan start any greylisting with QT. What package is recommended for QT?
Any HOWTO?
--
Tuptus
System uptime: 41 years 8 months 3 weeks 0 days 3 hours 45 minuts

Why use windows since there is a door?

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] Should I use qmail toaster?

[Erik Espinoza]

Hello Dave


Can QM Toaster be used to turn a default CentOS install into a very basic
POP3/IMAP/SMTP email server?


It's a lot more than basic, as it comes with antivirus, antispam,
domainkeys, spf and srs. I'd call it thorough rather than basic.


Our current ISP where we host ~15 domains and ~25+ email accounts has a
mandatory incoming "auto-discard" spam filter that is far too strict to
continue using.


That sucks.


Unfortunately, switching ISPs is not an option right now.


Good luck!


I am looking at signing up for a basic low-memory CentOS "Virtual Dedicated
Server" to  handle our own incoming (& outgoing) mail.


I wouldn't go too low on the memory unless you don't want antivirus
and antispam.


There will not be a full-time IT person to maintain the server, so
simplicity is a must.


The QmailToaster is very simple. This is a no brainer.


I am perfectly fine with leaving out server-side spam filtering, though I
suspect that some basic blacklist usage would be a good idea.


I'd recommend against leaving out the spam filtering, as blacklists
are usually too encompassing.


Most specifically, I don't want to add the performance overhead, security
liability, and maintenance requirements of a typical "default" server.
(Apache, MySQL, Bind, etc.)


In reality, the only thing that requires maintenance is the antispam,
antivirus and webmail.The project keeps those all up to date. The rest
is, for the most part, already a couple of years old and battle tested
on the internet. Known to be secure.


Basically, I want an ultra-basic server that I can set for automatic updates
and let it continue running "hands-off" until CentOS 4 is no longer
supported with security patches.


Sounds like the plan. It's how I run mine.


Will Qmail Toaster do what I need?


Yes. It's not basic, but it is simple. And there is plenty of support
here, on the wiki and on the main site.

Thanks,
Erik

-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] SMTP Auth - RBLS

[Erik Espinoza]

If you are using the latest 'qmail-toaster' package on main or devel,
it will start up a port 587 mail submission protocol port.

Point your clients to that port and it will work.

Thanks,
Erik

On 1/15/07, Stanley Robins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hello,

I have some users who send emails from home and have dynamic DSL IP
Addresses, i have enabled a few RBL's which give them error when they try to
send email. I know that if you have smtp auth enabled you can send emails
even if you are blacklisted, becuase the mail server autenticates you.

but this particular user is contantly having problems withe sending emails,
he says he is blocked by RBLS Dynamic ip error.

can you please throw some light on it why it happening and what should i do
to stop that..

Thank you



-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] how to tell if mail is rcvd from a certain domain

[Erik Espinoza]

Call after e-mail?

Sounds like BellSouth may have an overzealous spam filter, in which
case there is nothing you can do.

The way I see it, you have 3 options and none of them are gonna be pretty:

1) Get your customer an e-mail address at a place that sends bounces
when mail isn't accepted and delivered
2) Contact bellsouth postmaster, possibly through a third party acct
like gmail, and ask what you can do to get whitelisted or get off any
of the blacklists they may use. Then do that.
3) Try sending your mail through your upstream isp's mail server. This
means you can't do spf (unless they do spf) and you mustn't do
domainkeys (as your sig will always be bad)

Thanks,
Erik

On 1/15/07, David Milholen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I have a customer that cannot receive mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
has before with no problems, but for some reason in the last week he
cannot receive this mail from 2 diff accounts on bellsouth domain.
 How can I tell if the mail is being recieved from bellsouth?
Thanks


--
Wireless Etc
David Milholen
Lead Coordinator
Phone:(501)318-1300
Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web:www.wletc.com



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] apostrophe

[Erik Espinoza]

Tim,

Not a good idea. If you write this patch, it shall not be included
into the Toaster.

Qmail gets a lot of security by not allowing certain characters. For
example, any e-mail address that contains a "." is stored in the file
system as a ":" because the period is a file system navigation
character.

Thanks,
Erik

On 1/15/07, Tim Mancour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi,

The toaster seems to be more restrictive than the current SMTP
specification. RFC 2821 (page 37) only specifically prohibts ASCII
characters 0 through 31 and characters greater than 126 from the name of a
mailbox.

As a long term solution, couldn't we modify the "C" code (specifically the
function check_sender_address_format) to allow any character in the ASCII
range 33 through 126. We could then use the badmailfrom control file to
filter out sender addresses that contain characters that are undesirable. A
single line with an explicit set of characters could be used - e.g. [
,;:"'`&%\$\^\{\[\(\|\)\]\}\*\+\?\\].

I could be missing something but I think that this will allow each site to
customize as required without rebuilding the "C" code and without losing any
functionality. I'd be happy to make the C code changes if this make sense to
everyone.

Regards,
Tim


-Original Message-
From: Trung Pham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 5:14 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] apostrophe

Yeah, you will need to edit the C code before compiling it.

> eh no..
> Its just that to change qmailtoaster/checkuser you have to change the
> code a bit.
>
> Like Eric explained below.
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Dan Herbon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 
> Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 10:48 PM
> Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] apostrophe
>
>
>> So I have to have any user emailing this person to add a \ in front
>> of the email address?:
>>
>> Bd\'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Trung Pham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 4:37 PM
>> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
>> Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] apostrophe
>>
>> #define CHKUSER_ALLOW_SENDER_CHAR_2 '\''
>> that's the correct syntax
>>
>>> Dan Herbon wrote:
 I've been live on the new qmailtoaster server now for about 3 weeks
 and no problems have arisen, everythings been great.



 Today however I came across my first problem. A user we used to
 email back and forth has an apostrophe in her name and for some
 strange odd reason whoever set this person up put the apostrophe in her
email
 address. So her email address is:   bd'[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 The qmail server is rejecting this with:



 

 2007-01-12 15:09:52.456145500 CHKUSER rejected sender: from
  remote
  rcpt <> : invalid sender
 address format

 -



 Is there an easy way to allow an apostrophe in the email address be
 delivered? Perhaps add just this users email address to some sort
 of whitelist somewhere. Any help would be great. I have to get this
 working.



 thank

>>>
>>> You should try very hard to have the admin for that domain change
>>> the name.
>>>
>>> Short of success with that, you *can* tailor chkuser to accept
>>> additional special characters, but tailoring chkuser is somewhat of
>>> a PITA. See http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Chkuser. In
>>> chkuser.h you'll want to modify
>>> /* #define CHKUSER_ALLOW_SENDER_CHAR_2 '%' */ by uncommenting the
>>> #define, and specifying the apostrophe as the special character. I'm
>>> not sure how to do that properly in C, but it might be #define
>>> CHKUSER_ALLOW_SENDER_CHAR_2 '\''
>>> or
>>> #define CHKUSER_ALLOW_SENDER_CHAR_2 
>>> Maybe a C guru can help you out on that.
>>>
>>> HTH
>>> --
>>> -Eric 'shubes'
>>>
>>> -
>>>  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
>>> 
>>> - To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -
>> QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>>
>> -
>> QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>
>
> -
>  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted

Re: [qmailtoaster] qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.12

[Erik Espinoza]

Not sure I follow Jakin.

As mentioned before the latest qmail-toaster (currently on devel) will
always compile with the srs patch enabled. It is no longer necessary
to use "--define 'srs 1'" to enable or disable this at compile time
because Marcelo has made the qmail-srs patch be runtime
enabled/disabled.

If you don't configure srs_domain, the srs patch disables itself.

Erik

On 1/15/07, Jakin Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Does anyone with experience that when compiling the subject without
"--define 'srs 1'", the result is dependent false.

Thank you.
--
Jakin Lee



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] supervise: fatal: unable to start log/run: file does not exist

[Erik Espinoza]

Hello Rodrgio,

Do not reply to e-mails, instead send new e-mails to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

As far as your problem:

rpm -e --nodeps clamav-toaster
rpm -Uhv newclamav-toaster



On 1/15/07, Rodrigo RCT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



supervise: fatal: unable to start log/run: file does not exist

How to reinstall clamav ?

Help me, please !

- Original Message -
From: Dairenn Lombard
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 4:53 PM
Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] How to run a secondary MX with all user data?


Because if the other server dies, vpopmail wont have a database to go with.
I'll probably look at MySQL replication instead.

Dairenn Lombard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - BroadSpire Systems
Administration Dept.
BroadSpire, Inc. - http://www.broadspire.com/
"Security, Scalability & Automation"


-Original Message-
From: Fernando Azevedo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 10:58 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] How to run a secondary MX with all user data?



Why don't you simply edit your
/home/vpopmail/etc/vpopmail.mysql file to instruct that the
MySQL database is NOT on localhost?


-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] How to run a secondary MX with all user data?

[Erik Espinoza]

Hi Tim,

1) Add the domain into /var/qmail/control/rcpthosts
2) Add "domain:mx1.domain.com:25" to /var/qmail/control/smtproutes

Now your QmailToaster will be a backup mx for that one domain.

Erik

On 1/15/07, Tim Korves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi all,

maybe you'll find it's a stupid question, but I don't think so... I'd
like to run a secondary mx with the ability of sending of local users
email... Not for email checking via POP/IMAP, just for sending. How do I
have to configure the second mx with qmailtoaster?

Any advise or hint is welcome... ;)

Regards,

Tim

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] SSL on submission port howto..

[Erik Espinoza]

Just trying some things out here I noticed that Outlook Express and
qmail-toaster in ssl/require auth mode are not very compatible.


OE hasn't been updated to understand TLS. It only knows SSL.

All of the rest of the clients know TLS and SSL and will work properly
with the submission port. As noted on the list, SMTP-SSL is
deprecated, and that's whats required for OE.


Have not figured out what exactly goes wrong, but it seems OE never gets to
auth itself.
Debugging SSL encrypted sessions is a bit dificult 
It does work with the Mail program from Vista.

Looking for ways to solve this, since using SSL on the submission port is
pretty much required for security reasons I did find a way.
You have to use sslserver from ucspi-ssl
(http://www.superscript.com/ucspi-ssl/intro.html) .
Change the smtp-submission run script by adding
export CERTFILE="/var/qmail/control/servercert.pem"
export KEYFILE=""
export DHFILE=""

and change tcpserver in sslserver

At least that works here :)
If anyone has a rpmish version of ucspi-ssl or a simular program please
report!

Jean-Paul


-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.11 compilation error on srs

[Erik Espinoza]

Don't thank me, it was fixed by Marcelo Coelho, the original writer of
the srs2 patch.

:)


On 1/13/07, Philip Nix Guru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hello EE
Thx for the fast fix. Have a nice weekend

Erik Espinoza wrote:
> Done. New package available on the devel site.
>
> Thanks,
> Erik
>
> On 1/12/07, Erik Espinoza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Working on it.
>>
>> Erik
>>
>> On 1/12/07, Trung Pham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Any update on this issue?
>> >
>> > Thanks.
>> >
>> > > Hey Erik
>> > > Yes libsrs2-toaster installed fine (the new one you upped earlier)
>> > >
>> > > FC5 is the actual system
>> > >
>> > > checking on cnt44 in a few minutes just recompiling .. a few
>> things first
>> > >
>> > > Erik Espinoza wrote:
>> > >> Hey Phillip,
>> > >>
>> > >> Is it safe to assume that libsrs2-toaster is already installed?
>> > >>
>> > >> What version of FC are you running?
>> > >>
>> > >> Erik
>> > >>
>> > >> On 1/12/07, Philip Nix Guru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > >>> Evening
>> > >>> I am gonna feel guilty to annow EE with the FC machines
>> > >>> got this while building qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.11
>> > >>>
>> > >>> ./compile srs.c
>> > >>> srs.c: In function 'setup':
>> > >>> srs.c:23: warning: implicit declaration of function 'chdir'
>> > >>> srs.c:24: warning: implicit declaration of function 'control_init'
>> > >>> srs.c:26: warning: implicit declaration of function
>> 'control_readline'
>> > >>> srs.c:33: warning: implicit declaration of function
>> 'control_readfile'
>> > >>> srs.c:36: warning: implicit declaration of function
>> 'control_readint'
>> > >>> srs.c:41: warning: implicit declaration of function
>> 'rcpthosts_init'
>> > >>> srs.c: In function 'srsforward':
>> > >>> srs.c:56: warning: implicit declaration of function 'str_len'
>> > >>> srs.c:60: warning: implicit declaration of function 'rcpthosts'
>> > >>> srs.c:76: warning: implicit declaration of function
>> 'srs_error_str'
>> > >>> srs.c: At top level:
>> > >>> srs.c:131: error: static declaration of 'srs_error_str' follows
>> > >>> non-static declaration
>> > >>> srs.c:76: error: previous implicit declaration of
>> 'srs_error_str' was
>> > >>> here
>> > >>> make: *** [srs.o] Error 1
>> > >>> error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.56693 (%build)
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> will try on some other machines I got, to  make sure it isnt FC
>> related
>> > >>>
>> > >>> -Philip
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> -
>> > >>>  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
>> > >>>
>> -
>> > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > >>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> -
>> > >> QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
>> > >>
>> -
>> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > >> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> -
>> > >  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
>> > >
>> -
>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > -
>> >  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
>> > -
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > For additional commands, e-mail:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >
>> >
>>
>
> -
> QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.11 compilation error on srs

[Erik Espinoza]

Done. New package available on the devel site.

Thanks,
Erik

On 1/12/07, Erik Espinoza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Working on it.

Erik

On 1/12/07, Trung Pham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any update on this issue?
>
> Thanks.
>
> > Hey Erik
> > Yes libsrs2-toaster installed fine (the new one you upped earlier)
> >
> > FC5 is the actual system
> >
> > checking on cnt44 in a few minutes just recompiling .. a few things first
> >
> > Erik Espinoza wrote:
> >> Hey Phillip,
> >>
> >> Is it safe to assume that libsrs2-toaster is already installed?
> >>
> >> What version of FC are you running?
> >>
> >> Erik
> >>
> >> On 1/12/07, Philip Nix Guru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> Evening
> >>> I am gonna feel guilty to annow EE with the FC machines
> >>> got this while building qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.11
> >>>
> >>> ./compile srs.c
> >>> srs.c: In function 'setup':
> >>> srs.c:23: warning: implicit declaration of function 'chdir'
> >>> srs.c:24: warning: implicit declaration of function 'control_init'
> >>> srs.c:26: warning: implicit declaration of function 'control_readline'
> >>> srs.c:33: warning: implicit declaration of function 'control_readfile'
> >>> srs.c:36: warning: implicit declaration of function 'control_readint'
> >>> srs.c:41: warning: implicit declaration of function 'rcpthosts_init'
> >>> srs.c: In function 'srsforward':
> >>> srs.c:56: warning: implicit declaration of function 'str_len'
> >>> srs.c:60: warning: implicit declaration of function 'rcpthosts'
> >>> srs.c:76: warning: implicit declaration of function 'srs_error_str'
> >>> srs.c: At top level:
> >>> srs.c:131: error: static declaration of 'srs_error_str' follows
> >>> non-static declaration
> >>> srs.c:76: error: previous implicit declaration of 'srs_error_str' was
> >>> here
> >>> make: *** [srs.o] Error 1
> >>> error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.56693 (%build)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> will try on some other machines I got, to  make sure it isnt FC related
> >>>
> >>> -Philip
> >>>
> >>> -
> >>>  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
> >>> -
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> -
> >> QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
> >> -
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >
> >
> > -
> >  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>
>
> -
>  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>



-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[qmailtoaster] DEVEL PACKAGE: qmail-toaster

[Erik Espinoza]

Greetings,

I have put up a new qmail-toaster package on the devel site,
http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/ that fixes the compile issue with the
Fedora Core's.

Thanks,
Erik

-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] Invalid recipient bounces

[Erik Espinoza]

Most people recommend against catchall's.

http://ask.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/01/10/2349241

On 1/12/07, George Sweetnam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

You shouldn't set the catchall to bounce though... select delete.  The
dictionary attacks will harvest the valid users if you select bounce!

George.
- Original Message -
From: "Nathan Grennan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 12:48 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Invalid recipient bounces


Eric "Shubes" wrote:
> I presume these are coming into your catchall account.
> Is
> http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Account_verification_using_badmailto
> what you're looking for?
>
>
  I thought I had disabled the catchall a while back. I just checked and
found it enabled on the postmaster account. I switched it to bounce.
This should give me the desired recipient checking without any more
backscatter?

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] Centos4 = fubar

[Erik Espinoza]

I am using CentOS 4.x and installed the rpm's from rpmforge (old Dag
Wieers repo). This is what I have:

[15713] dbg: dns: is Net::DNS::Resolver available? yes
[15713] dbg: dns: Net::DNS version: 0.48
[15713] dbg: diag: perl platform: 5.008005 linux
[15713] dbg: diag: module installed: Digest::SHA1, version 2.07
[15713] dbg: diag: module not installed: IP::Country::Fast ('require' failed)
[15713] dbg: diag: module not installed: Razor2::Client::Agent
('require' failed)
[15713] dbg: diag: module installed: Net::Ident, version 1.20
[15713] dbg: diag: module installed: IO::Socket::INET6, version 2.51
[15713] dbg: diag: module installed: IO::Socket::SSL, version 1.01
[15713] dbg: diag: module installed: Time::HiRes, version 1.55
[15713] dbg: diag: module installed: DBI, version 1.40
[15713] dbg: diag: module installed: Getopt::Long, version 2.34
[15713] dbg: diag: module installed: LWP::UserAgent, version 2.031
[15713] dbg: diag: module installed: HTTP::Date, version 1.46
[15713] dbg: diag: module installed: Archive::Tar, version 1.30
[15713] dbg: diag: module installed: IO::Zlib, version 1.04
[15713] dbg: diag: module installed: DB_File, version 1.809
[15713] dbg: diag: module installed: HTML::Parser, version 3.35
[15713] dbg: diag: module installed: MIME::Base64, version 3.01
[15713] dbg: diag: module installed: Net::DNS, version 0.48
[15713] dbg: diag: module installed: Net::SMTP, version 2.29
[15713] dbg: diag: module installed: Mail::SPF::Query, version 1.999001

I have no issues.
On 1/12/07, Jake Vickers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Vince Callaway wrote:
> Another poster asked about issues with Centos.  I did a quick install a
> few weeks ago and everything appeared to be ok.  Turns out I was wrong.
>
> The issue is with Spamassassin and perl modules.  I started with a clean
> install yesterday to check things out and finally gave up.
>
> During the CPAN install of modules several of them fail.  As with Fedora
> I setup another repository to get the pre-compiled modules in RPM
> format.  The installation of the modules completes but spamassassin
> still throws an error.  Plus some of the modules were not even
> available.
>
> After several hours I finally gave up.  I was unable to get
> spamassassin-toaster fully functional.
>
> If anyone here is running Centos I would be curious as to what the
> output of the command "spamassassin -D --lint" shows for "module not
> installed:"
>
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release
CentOS release 4.4 (Final)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# spamassassin -D --lint
[16550] dbg: logger: adding facilities: all
[16550] dbg: logger: logging level is DBG
[16550] dbg: generic: SpamAssassin version 3.1.3
[16550] dbg: config: score set 0 chosen.
[16550] dbg: util: running in taint mode? yes
[16550] dbg: util: taint mode: deleting unsafe environment variables,
resetting PATH
[16550] dbg: util: PATH included '/usr/kerberos/sbin', keeping
[16550] dbg: util: PATH included '/usr/kerberos/bin', keeping
[16550] dbg: util: PATH included '/usr/local/sbin', keeping
[16550] dbg: util: PATH included '/usr/local/bin', keeping
[16550] dbg: util: PATH included '/sbin', keeping
[16550] dbg: util: PATH included '/bin', keeping
[16550] dbg: util: PATH included '/usr/sbin', keeping
[16550] dbg: util: PATH included '/usr/bin', keeping
[16550] dbg: util: PATH included '/usr/X11R6/bin', keeping
[16550] dbg: util: PATH included '/root/bin', which doesn't exist, dropping
[16550] dbg: util: final PATH set to:
/usr/kerberos/sbin:/usr/kerberos/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin
[16550] dbg: message:  MIME PARSER START 
[16550] dbg: message: main message type: text/plain
[16550] dbg: message: parsing normal part
[16550] dbg: message: added part, type: text/plain
[16550] dbg: message:  MIME PARSER END 
[16550] dbg: dns: is Net::DNS::Resolver available? yes
[16550] dbg: dns: Net::DNS version: 0.48
[16550] dbg: diag: perl platform: 5.008005 linux
[16550] dbg: diag: module installed: Digest::SHA1, version 2.07
[16550] dbg: diag: module installed: HTTP::Date, version 1.46
[16550] dbg: diag: module installed: Archive::Tar, version 1.30
[16550] dbg: diag: module installed: IO::Zlib, version 1.04
[16550] dbg: diag: module installed: DB_File, version 1.809
[16550] dbg: diag: module installed: HTML::Parser, version 3.35
[16550] dbg: diag: module installed: MIME::Base64, version 3.01
[16550] dbg: diag: module installed: Net::DNS, version 0.48
[16550] dbg: diag: module installed: Net::SMTP, version 2.29
[16550] dbg: diag: module installed: Mail::SPF::Query, version 1.999001
[16550] dbg: diag: module installed: IP::Country::Fast, version 309.002
[16550] dbg: diag: module not installed: Razor2::Client::Agent
('require' failed)
[16550] dbg: diag: module not installed: Net::Ident ('require' failed)
[16550] dbg: diag: module not installed: IO::Socket::INET6 ('require'
failed)
[16550] dbg: diag: module installed: IO::Socket::SSL, version 0.97
[16550] dbg: diag: mod

Re: [qmailtoaster] simscan: connect error 2

[Erik Espinoza]

No other config changes are necessary.

Erik

On 1/12/07, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I seem to remember reading about p0f checking and windoze machines and such.
 I googled "p0fcheck" instead of "p0f check". What a difference a space
makes. ;)

I told qtp-newmodel to restore my configuration files, which is why I didn't
pick that up. Do any other configuration changes come to mind? Don't think
very long on it.

Perhaps qtp-newmodel might be enhanced to look for configuration changes.
Some day. ;)

Erik Espinoza wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> The new install will add the NOP0FCHECK=1 automatically.
>
> The new simscan has passive operating system fingerprinting, so that
> you can do things like block Windows machines that come from "*ppp*",
> "*dialup*" and so forth. The P0F daemon, required for this, is not
> going to be a part of the QmailToaster, therefore we default to
> disabling this.
>
> Thanks,
> Erik
>
> On 1/12/07, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I just upgraded to the latest stable toaster. Everything appears to be
>> ok,
>> but I'm getting the subject message in my smtp log when a message is
>> scanned. It appears to scan ok though, and the message is delivered
>> normally.
>>
>> Not much about it on google, except one post that says setting
>> NOP0FCHECK=1
>> will get rid of the message.
>>
>> Anyone have any knowledge about this they'd like to share?
>> --
>> -Eric 'shubes'
>>


--
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] simscan: connect error 2

[Erik Espinoza]

Hi Eric,

The new install will add the NOP0FCHECK=1 automatically.

The new simscan has passive operating system fingerprinting, so that
you can do things like block Windows machines that come from "*ppp*",
"*dialup*" and so forth. The P0F daemon, required for this, is not
going to be a part of the QmailToaster, therefore we default to
disabling this.

Thanks,
Erik

On 1/12/07, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I just upgraded to the latest stable toaster. Everything appears to be ok,
but I'm getting the subject message in my smtp log when a message is
scanned. It appears to scan ok though, and the message is delivered normally.

Not much about it on google, except one post that says setting NOP0FCHECK=1
will get rid of the message.

Anyone have any knowledge about this they'd like to share?
--
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.11 compilation error on srs

[Erik Espinoza]

Working on it.

Erik

On 1/12/07, Trung Pham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Any update on this issue?

Thanks.

> Hey Erik
> Yes libsrs2-toaster installed fine (the new one you upped earlier)
>
> FC5 is the actual system
>
> checking on cnt44 in a few minutes just recompiling .. a few things first
>
> Erik Espinoza wrote:
>> Hey Phillip,
>>
>> Is it safe to assume that libsrs2-toaster is already installed?
>>
>> What version of FC are you running?
>>
>> Erik
>>
>> On 1/12/07, Philip Nix Guru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Evening
>>> I am gonna feel guilty to annow EE with the FC machines
>>> got this while building qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.11
>>>
>>> ./compile srs.c
>>> srs.c: In function 'setup':
>>> srs.c:23: warning: implicit declaration of function 'chdir'
>>> srs.c:24: warning: implicit declaration of function 'control_init'
>>> srs.c:26: warning: implicit declaration of function 'control_readline'
>>> srs.c:33: warning: implicit declaration of function 'control_readfile'
>>> srs.c:36: warning: implicit declaration of function 'control_readint'
>>> srs.c:41: warning: implicit declaration of function 'rcpthosts_init'
>>> srs.c: In function 'srsforward':
>>> srs.c:56: warning: implicit declaration of function 'str_len'
>>> srs.c:60: warning: implicit declaration of function 'rcpthosts'
>>> srs.c:76: warning: implicit declaration of function 'srs_error_str'
>>> srs.c: At top level:
>>> srs.c:131: error: static declaration of 'srs_error_str' follows
>>> non-static declaration
>>> srs.c:76: error: previous implicit declaration of 'srs_error_str' was
>>> here
>>> make: *** [srs.o] Error 1
>>> error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.56693 (%build)
>>>
>>>
>>> will try on some other machines I got, to  make sure it isnt FC related
>>>
>>> -Philip
>>>
>>> -
>>>  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>
>>
>> -
>> QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>
>
> -
>  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] apostrophe

[Erik Espinoza]

You may possibly be able to edit the chkuser patch to allow it,
however know that if you don't follow the e-mail spec then many
different servers will reject you for invalid characters.

Thanks,
Erik

On 1/12/07, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Dan Herbon wrote:
> I've been live on the new qmailtoaster server now for about 3 weeks and
> no problems have arisen, everythings been great.
>
>
>
> Today however I came across my first problem. A user we used to email
> back and forth has an apostrophe in her name and for some strange odd
> reason whoever set this person up put the apostrophe in her email
> address. So her email address is:   bd'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> The qmail server is rejecting this with:
>
>
>
> 
>
> 2007-01-12 15:09:52.456145500 CHKUSER rejected sender: from
>  remote
>  rcpt <> : invalid sender address
> format
>
> -
>
>
>
> Is there an easy way to allow an apostrophe in the email address be
> delivered? Perhaps add just this users email address to some sort of
> whitelist somewhere. Any help would be great. I have to get this working.
>
>
>
> thank
>

You should try very hard to have the admin for that domain change the name.

Short of success with that, you *can* tailor chkuser to accept additional
special characters, but tailoring chkuser is somewhat of a PITA. See
http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Chkuser. In chkuser.h you'll want to
modify
/* #define CHKUSER_ALLOW_SENDER_CHAR_2 '%' */
by uncommenting the #define, and specifying the apostrophe as the special
character. I'm not sure how to do that properly in C, but it might be
#define CHKUSER_ALLOW_SENDER_CHAR_2 '\''
or
#define CHKUSER_ALLOW_SENDER_CHAR_2 
Maybe a C guru can help you out on that.

HTH
--
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] apostrophe

[Erik Espinoza]

Apostrophe is not a valid email character.

Erik

On 1/12/07, Dan Herbon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:





I've been live on the new qmailtoaster server now for about 3 weeks and no
problems have arisen, everythings been great.



Today however I came across my first problem. A user we used to email back
and forth has an apostrophe in her name and for some strange odd reason
whoever set this person up put the apostrophe in her email address. So her
email address is:   bd'[EMAIL PROTECTED]



The qmail server is rejecting this with:





2007-01-12 15:09:52.456145500 CHKUSER rejected sender: from
 remote
 rcpt <> : invalid
sender address format

-



Is there an easy way to allow an apostrophe in the email address be
delivered? Perhaps add just this users email address to some sort of
whitelist somewhere. Any help would be great. I have to get this working.



thank


-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.11 compilation error on srs

[Erik Espinoza]

Hey Phillip,

Is it safe to assume that libsrs2-toaster is already installed?

What version of FC are you running?

Erik

On 1/12/07, Philip Nix Guru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Evening
I am gonna feel guilty to annow EE with the FC machines
got this while building qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.11

./compile srs.c
srs.c: In function 'setup':
srs.c:23: warning: implicit declaration of function 'chdir'
srs.c:24: warning: implicit declaration of function 'control_init'
srs.c:26: warning: implicit declaration of function 'control_readline'
srs.c:33: warning: implicit declaration of function 'control_readfile'
srs.c:36: warning: implicit declaration of function 'control_readint'
srs.c:41: warning: implicit declaration of function 'rcpthosts_init'
srs.c: In function 'srsforward':
srs.c:56: warning: implicit declaration of function 'str_len'
srs.c:60: warning: implicit declaration of function 'rcpthosts'
srs.c:76: warning: implicit declaration of function 'srs_error_str'
srs.c: At top level:
srs.c:131: error: static declaration of 'srs_error_str' follows
non-static declaration
srs.c:76: error: previous implicit declaration of 'srs_error_str' was here
make: *** [srs.o] Error 1
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.56693 (%build)


will try on some other machines I got, to  make sure it isnt FC related

-Philip

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] simscan (simscan-toaster-1.3.1-1.3.3) segfaults

[Erik Espinoza]

Could you paste the log output. I've not noticed any problems.

Erik

On 1/12/07, Warren (mailing lists) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I noticed that simscan was not able to be called in the logs.  When I
try to run it directly (./simscan in the bin directory) it gives a segfault.

Any ideas?

W

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] Ldap Authentication

[Erik Espinoza]

Looks accurate to me. The amount of work to keep this codebase alive,
secure and stable takes a lot of time. Adding a major change like this
isn't in the cards. If someone wants to take the current base, rework
the vpopmail and merge it into the mainstream I can add it as an
unsupported feature like the spambox.

Until then, this isn't moving forward.

Thanks,
Erik

On 1/12/07, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Jake Vickers wrote:
> Stefano Scalise wrote:
>> Hi to all,
>>
>> I am going to implement a mail server based on qmailtoaster. I saw
>> that qmailtoaster comes with a mysql-based installation. As I need an
>> authentication method qmail-based, do you think it is easily
>> switchable teh authentication from mysql to ldap?
>> Thanks for your answers.
> Nope. It doesn't support LDAP. There's no plans to as of this date
> either. Sorry.

I noticed that LDAP has been requested at
http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Wish_List.
I've written a reply. Will anyone more knowledgable please review it for
accuracy?

--
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] libsrs2 compilation error

[Erik Espinoza]

New package released fixes this. Please try again.

On 1/12/07, Philip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hello
I was gonna install that new qt from the dev site
I was wondering if any1 ran into problems building the libsrs2 rpm ?
I have the problem on 2 different FC5 machines
same build error
any ideas ?
Thx
-P

 cut here ---

Processing files: libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-1.3.1
Executing(%doc): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.95317
+ umask 022
+ cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD
+ cd libsrs2-1.0.18
+ 
DOCDIR=/var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root/usr/share/doc/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18
+ export DOCDIR
+ rm -rf 
/var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root/usr/share/doc/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18
+ /bin/mkdir -p 
/var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root/usr/share/doc/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18
+ cp -pr ChangeLog INSTALL README NEWS AUTHORS COPYING 
/var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root/usr/share/doc/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18
+ exit 0
Provides: libsrs2.so.0
Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) 
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libnsl.so.1 libresolv.so.2 
libsrs2.so.0
Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files 
/var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/lib/libsrs2.so


RPM build errors:
Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/lib/libsrs2.so


 cut here -

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] libsrs2 build error on FC6

[Erik Espinoza]

I got access to a 64 bit machine to test this, and foudn the problem.
This has been fixed and is avialable for download on the main site.

Thanks,
Erik

On 1/12/07, Trung Pham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

For some reason, it wrote those files to this directory
/var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root/usr/lib/

and not

/var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root/usr/lib64/

Can you someone check the 64 bit build script?


> Here is a longer detail of the compilation error
>
> ---cut
>
> Processing files: libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-1.3.1
> error: File not found by glob:
> /var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root/usr/lib64/libsrs2.so.*
> error: File not found:
> /var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root/usr/lib64/libsrs2.a
> error: File not found:
> /var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root/usr/lib64/libsrs2.la
> Executing(%doc): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.92251
> + umask 022
> + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD
> + cd libsrs2-1.0.18
> +
> 
DOCDIR=/var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root/usr/share/doc/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18
> + export DOCDIR
> + rm -rf
> /var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root/usr/share/doc/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18
> + /bin/mkdir -p
> /var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root/usr/share/doc/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18
> + cp -pr ChangeLog INSTALL README NEWS AUTHORS COPYING
> /var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root/usr/share/doc/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18
> + exit 0
>
>
> RPM build errors:
> File not found by glob:
> /var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root/usr/lib64/libsrs2.so.*
> File not found:
> /var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root/usr/lib64/libsrs2.a
> File not found:
> /var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root/usr/lib64/libsrs2.la
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] qtms-install]#
> libtool: install: warning:
> `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/libsrs2-1.0.18/libsrs2/libsrs2.la' has not been
> installed in `/usr/lib'
> /usr/bin/install -c .libs/srs
> /var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root/usr/bin/srs
> make[2]: Nothing to be done for `install-data-am'.
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/libsrs2-1.0.18/tools'
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/libsrs2-1.0.18/tools'
> make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/libsrs2-1.0.18'
> make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/libsrs2-1.0.18'
> make[2]: Nothing to be done for `install-exec-am'.
> make[2]: Nothing to be done for `install-data-am'.
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/libsrs2-1.0.18'
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/libsrs2-1.0.18'
> + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-compress
> + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-strip /usr/bin/strip
> + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-strip-static-archive /usr/bin/strip
> + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-strip-comment-note /usr/bin/strip
> /usr/bin/objdump
> + /usr/lib/rpm/brp-python-bytecompile
> + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-java-repack-jars
> Processing files: libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-1.3.1
> error: File not found by glob:
> /var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root/usr/lib64/libsrs2.so.*
> error: File not found:
> /var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root/usr/lib64/libsrs2.a
> error: File not found:
> /var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root/usr/lib64/libsrs2.la
> Executing(%doc): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.92251
> + umask 022
> + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD
> + cd libsrs2-1.0.18
> +
> 
DOCDIR=/var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root/usr/share/doc/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18
> + export DOCDIR
> + rm -rf
> /var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root/usr/share/doc/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18
> + /bin/mkdir -p
> /var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root/usr/share/doc/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18
> + cp -pr ChangeLog INSTALL README NEWS AUTHORS COPYING
> /var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root/usr/share/doc/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18
> + exit 0
>
>
> RPM build errors:
> File not found by glob:
> /var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root/usr/lib64/libsrs2.so.*
> File not found:
> /var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root/usr/lib64/libsrs2.a
> File not found:
> /var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root/usr/lib64/libsrs2.la
>
>
> ---end
>
>
>
>
>
>> I am getting this error when builing lbrsr2-toaster.
>>
>> RPM build errors:
>> File not found by glob:
>> /var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root/usr/lib64/libsrs2.so.*
>> File not found:
>> /var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root/usr/lib64/libsrs2.a
>> File not found:
>> /var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root/usr/lib64/libsrs2.la
>>
>> Is there anyone out there with the same problem?
>>
>>
>> -
>>  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>
>
>
> -
>  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>



--

Re: [qmailtoaster] libsrs2 build error on all FC3-6 systems

[Erik Espinoza]

My apologies, This has been fixed and is available for download from
the main site.

Thanks,
Erik

On 1/12/07, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

That's very peculiar. Sounds like a bug all right. I'm not much help with
FC. I'm sure that EE (or someone else?) can help you out with it when he
gets the time.

Philip Nix Guru wrote:
> Hi Eric
> there is no /usr/lib/libsrs2.so on any of the systems I tested, it is
> the building script that bugs on fedora systems
> I tested on 2 fc3, 1 fc4 and 3 fc5 none have the libsrs2 installed
> it did work on a fc5 where I had libsrs2 compiled previoulsy
>
>
> Eric "Shubes" wrote:
>> Jason,
>> You appear to have the same problem as Trung, which is apparently
>> limited to
>> 64 bit machines. As he discovered, the files not found are being put
>> in the
>> lib directory instead of the lib64 directory. I expect that's a bug in
>> the
>> Makefile, which I'm sure EE will look into when he gets a the chance.
>>
>> Philip,
>> You, on the other hand, appear to have a different problem. It doesn't
>> like
>> the /usr/lib/libsrs2.so file that's on your system, as it apparently
>> isn't
>> owned by any package. You can confirm this by
>> # rpm -qf /usr/lib/libsrs2.so
>> If it's indeed not part of a package, where'd it come from? What's the
>> date
>> on it? Did you build it from source at some point? I think if you
>> remove it
>> (or rename it to be on the safe side) your install will proceed further.
>>
>> Jason P wrote:
>>
>>> I am also having trouble on a centos 4064 system (worked fine on cnt40
>>> box)...
>>>
>>> #rpmbuild --rebuild --with cnt4064 libsrs2-toaster-*.src.rpm
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>> RPM build errors:
>>> File not found by glob:
>>> /var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root/usr/lib64/libsrs2.so.*
>>> File not found:
>>> /var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root/usr/lib64/libsrs2.a
>>> File not found:
>>> /var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root/usr/lib64/libsrs2.la
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Philip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007
>>> 10:24 AM
>>> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
>>> Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] libsrs2 build error on all FC3-6 systems
>>>
>>> So busy today, didnt have time to dig into it yet
>>> but the spec file in the dist
>>> (http://www.libsrs2.org/srs/libsrs2-1.0.18.tar.gz)
>>> wont work either on a FC system.
>>> Will check back later tonight
>>>
>>>
>>> Philip wrote:
>>>
 Of course I ment build error not compilation error
 it definatly doesnt work on FC3 FC4 FC5 & FC6 (manual compilation
 works)
 all got the same error I listed below.
 On centos 4.4 it worked

 Philip wrote:

> Hello
> I was gonna install that new qt from the dev site
> I was wondering if any1 ran into problems building the libsrs2 rpm ?
> I have the problem on 2 different FC5 machines
> same build error
> any ideas ?
> Thx
> -P
>
>  cut here ---
>
> Processing files: libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-1.3.1
> Executing(%doc): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.95317
> + umask 022
> + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD
> + cd libsrs2-1.0.18
> +
>
>>> DOCDIR=/var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root/usr/share/doc/libsrs2-toaster-1.
>>>
>>> 0.18
> + export DOCDIR
> + rm -rf
> /var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root/usr/share/doc/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18
>
> + /bin/mkdir -p
> /var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root/usr/share/doc/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18
>
> + cp -pr ChangeLog INSTALL README NEWS AUTHORS COPYING
> /var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root/usr/share/doc/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18
>
> + exit 0
> Provides: libsrs2.so.0
> Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
> rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
> Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1)
> libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libnsl.so.1
> libresolv.so.2 libsrs2.so.0
> Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files
> /var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root
> error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
>   /usr/lib/libsrs2.so
>
>
> RPM build errors:
>Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
>   /usr/lib/libsrs2.so
>
>
>  cut here -
>


--
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[qmailtoaster] UPDATED PACKAGE: libsrs2-toaster

[Erik Espinoza]

Greetings,

I have re-released libsrs2-toaser, with minor packaging fixes. This
should work properly on 64 bit and Fedora releases. It is available
for download on the main site.

Thanks,
Erik

-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[qmailtoaster] INITIAL PACKAGE: libsrs2-toaster DEVEL PACAKGE: qmail-toaster, simscan-toaster

[Erik Espinoza]

Since the qmail-toaster on the main site can now have srs support
enabled, I have moved libsrs2-toaster to the main site. In addition,
all current install scripts from the site will now install
libsrs2-toaster before qmail-toaster.

On the devel site we have two updated packages. The new qmail-toaster
on the devel site now includes a newer srs patch that automatically
disables itself if no srs_domain is configured. This means that you
will no longer have to use "--define 'srs 1'" for future
installations. I have also included the srs-readme.txt file as
/var/qmail/doc/README.srs. It'll work if you configure it, otherwise
remain dormant. The new simscan-toaster on the devel site will now
install with clamav 0.90rc2 installed or higher. Some error checking
has been disabled, as simscan works beautifully with the latest
clamav, but the configure scripts are a little brain dead.

The remaining 3 packages on devel will be moving to the main site in 1
weeks time.

Thanks,
Erik

-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] clamav-toaster-0.90rc2-1.3.8 / simscan-toaster-1.3.1-1.3.3 upgrade problem

[Erik Espinoza]

Hi Eric,

I have released a new simscan on the devel site. One minor change,
allows you to install this simscan with the clamav 0.90rc2 installed.

Thanks,
Erik

On 1/11/07, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

It appears to be a big improvement from what I'm reading. It's been out
since October, so I imagine that a lot of the kinks are worked out by now.

Thanks for restoring the old one so quickly. I'm upgrading presently.

Erik Espinoza wrote:
> ES,
>
> Although it is an rc version, it is very much improved over the older
> clamav versions. Also there have been less releases, so it appears as
> though the rc is more "stable" as far as codebases go.
>
> Thanks,
> Erik
>
> On 1/11/07, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> No problem. Everything's still in the sandbox on both machines, so it
>> hasn't
>> impacted my uptime.
>>
>> I'm really perplexed why one machine upgrades to the old format and the
>> other upgrades to the new. The only thing I can see is that the one
>> with the
>> new format is starting from a more recent release. There's something else
>> I'm not seeing (which is nothing new).
>>
>> I thought it was a little odd that you had an rc version on the main
>> site.
>> Once I get my toasters upgraded (to 0.88.7), I'll do some testing from
>> the
>> devel site and let you know.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Erik Espinoza wrote:
>> > ES,
>> >
>> > I'll take a look at the simscan script. I didn't notice any issue
>> > installing on my tests, I haven't worked with your scripts much
>> > though, so perhaps I should start testing against your scripts.
>> >
>> > You can, for now, do the following to work around it:
>> >
>> > service freshclam stop
>> > touch /usr/share/clamav/daily.cvd /usr/share/clamav/main.cvd
>> > BUILD/Install Simscan
>> > rm -f /usr/share/clamav/daily.cvd /usr/share/clamav/main.cvd
>> > service freshclam start
>> >
>> > My apologies for letting this out, I will revert the main site to
>> > clamav 0.88.7 and move 0.90rc2 back to devel.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Erik
>> >
>> > touch /usr/share/clamav
>> >
>> > On 1/11/07, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> Erik Espinoza wrote:
>> >> > The new simscan (v1.3.1-1.3.3) knows about the new clamav system.
>> >> > Upgrade clamav first, then upgrade simscan.
>> >>
>> >> I'm using newmodel to do the upgrades, so clamav *is* upgraded first
>> >> (and I
>> >> don't have a down toaster ;) ).
>> >>
>> >> Simscan's configure script (v1.3.1-1.3.3) is looking for the daily.cvd
>> >> file,
>> >> which apparently doesn't exist any more (when upgrading from
>> >> clamav-toaster-0.88.7-1.3.7) and been (apparently) replaced with the
>> >> daily.inc directory.
>> >>
>> >> I also don't understand why, when I upgrade clamav from 1.3.2 I
>> don't get
>> >> the daily.inc directory, but when I upgrade from 1.3.7 I do.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> -Eric 'shubes'
>> >>
>>
>>
>> --
>> -Eric 'shubes'
>>


--
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] clamav-toaster-0.90rc2-1.3.8 / simscan-toaster-1.3.1-1.3.3 upgrade problem

[Erik Espinoza]

ES,

Although it is an rc version, it is very much improved over the older
clamav versions. Also there have been less releases, so it appears as
though the rc is more "stable" as far as codebases go.

Thanks,
Erik

On 1/11/07, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

No problem. Everything's still in the sandbox on both machines, so it hasn't
impacted my uptime.

I'm really perplexed why one machine upgrades to the old format and the
other upgrades to the new. The only thing I can see is that the one with the
new format is starting from a more recent release. There's something else
I'm not seeing (which is nothing new).

I thought it was a little odd that you had an rc version on the main site.
Once I get my toasters upgraded (to 0.88.7), I'll do some testing from the
devel site and let you know.

Thanks!

Erik Espinoza wrote:
> ES,
>
> I'll take a look at the simscan script. I didn't notice any issue
> installing on my tests, I haven't worked with your scripts much
> though, so perhaps I should start testing against your scripts.
>
> You can, for now, do the following to work around it:
>
> service freshclam stop
> touch /usr/share/clamav/daily.cvd /usr/share/clamav/main.cvd
> BUILD/Install Simscan
> rm -f /usr/share/clamav/daily.cvd /usr/share/clamav/main.cvd
> service freshclam start
>
> My apologies for letting this out, I will revert the main site to
> clamav 0.88.7 and move 0.90rc2 back to devel.
>
> Thanks,
> Erik
>
> touch /usr/share/clamav
>
> On 1/11/07, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Erik Espinoza wrote:
>> > The new simscan (v1.3.1-1.3.3) knows about the new clamav system.
>> > Upgrade clamav first, then upgrade simscan.
>>
>> I'm using newmodel to do the upgrades, so clamav *is* upgraded first
>> (and I
>> don't have a down toaster ;) ).
>>
>> Simscan's configure script (v1.3.1-1.3.3) is looking for the daily.cvd
>> file,
>> which apparently doesn't exist any more (when upgrading from
>> clamav-toaster-0.88.7-1.3.7) and been (apparently) replaced with the
>> daily.inc directory.
>>
>> I also don't understand why, when I upgrade clamav from 1.3.2 I don't get
>> the daily.inc directory, but when I upgrade from 1.3.7 I do.
>>
>> --
>> -Eric 'shubes'
>>


--
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] clamav-toaster-0.90rc2-1.3.8 / simscan-toaster-1.3.1-1.3.3 upgrade problem

[Erik Espinoza]

ES,

I'll take a look at the simscan script. I didn't notice any issue
installing on my tests, I haven't worked with your scripts much
though, so perhaps I should start testing against your scripts.

You can, for now, do the following to work around it:

service freshclam stop
touch /usr/share/clamav/daily.cvd /usr/share/clamav/main.cvd
BUILD/Install Simscan
rm -f /usr/share/clamav/daily.cvd /usr/share/clamav/main.cvd
service freshclam start

My apologies for letting this out, I will revert the main site to
clamav 0.88.7 and move 0.90rc2 back to devel.

Thanks,
Erik

touch /usr/share/clamav

On 1/11/07, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Erik Espinoza wrote:
> The new simscan (v1.3.1-1.3.3) knows about the new clamav system.
> Upgrade clamav first, then upgrade simscan.

I'm using newmodel to do the upgrades, so clamav *is* upgraded first (and I
don't have a down toaster ;) ).

Simscan's configure script (v1.3.1-1.3.3) is looking for the daily.cvd file,
which apparently doesn't exist any more (when upgrading from
clamav-toaster-0.88.7-1.3.7) and been (apparently) replaced with the
daily.inc directory.

I also don't understand why, when I upgrade clamav from 1.3.2 I don't get
the daily.inc directory, but when I upgrade from 1.3.7 I do.

--
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] Stop receiving email from most servers after Qmail update

[Erik Espinoza]

There shouldn't be. I don't have a 64 bit machine to reproduce this
issue at the moment.

Thanks,
Erik

On 1/11/07, Lazaro Ferreira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Erik,

Any issue with the libraries listed here ?

On 1/11/07, Lazaro Ferreira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> ldd /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd
>libssl.so.4 => /lib64/libssl.so.4 (0x002a95566000)
>libcrypto.so.4 => /lib64/libcrypto.so.4 (0x002a956a2000)
>libresolv.so.2 => /lib64/libresolv.so.2 (0x003552d0)
>libm.so.6 => /lib64/tls/libm.so.6 (0x00355230)
>libcrypt.so.1 => /lib64/libcrypt.so.1 (0x00355290)
>libc.so.6 => /lib64/tls/libc.so.6 (0x003551e0)
>libgssapi_krb5.so.2 => /usr/lib64/libgssapi_krb5.so.2
> (0x00355410)
>libkrb5.so.3 => /usr/lib64/libkrb5.so.3 (0x00355470)
>libcom_err.so.2 => /lib64/libcom_err.so.2 (0x00355370)
>libk5crypto.so.3 => /usr/lib64/libk5crypto.so.3 (0x00355430)
>libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x00355210)
>libz.so.1 => /usr/lib64/libz.so.1 (0x002a958d5000)
>/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x003551c0)
>
>
>
> On 1/11/07, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Looks like EE's on the right track...
> >
> > Erik Espinoza wrote:
> > > That's not the issue. Those files don't need to exist.
> > >
> > > The problem is that qmail-smtpd is attempting to open a tty. Here is
> > > what an strace shows on a working server:
> > >
> > > open("control/clientca.pem", O_RDONLY)  = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
> > > directory)
> > > open("control/clientcrl.pem", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
> > > directory)
> > > open("control/servercert.pem", O_RDONLY) = 5
> > >
> > > Looks like something is wrong with one of the libraries that qmail is
> > > linked against. It shouldn't be pulling in a tty interface. Do an ldd
> > > on qmail-smtpd.
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Erik
> > >
> > >
> > > On 1/11/07, Lazaro Ferreira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> I have ran strace again this time emulating the real thing (strace
> > >> tcpserver then forks qmail-smtpd)
> > >>
> > >> This what happens : it seems like it is looking for files
> > >> (clientca.pem and clientcrl.pem ) that doesn't exist there :
> > >> -
> > >> 28887 open("control/clientca.pem", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file
> > >> or directory)
> > >> 28887 open("control/clientcrl.pem", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such
> > >> file or directory)
> > >> 28887 open("/dev/tty", O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK|O_NOCTTY) = -1 ENXIO (No such
> > >> device or address)
> > >> 28887 writev(2, [{"*** glibc detected *** ", 23}, {"free(): invalid
> > >> pointer", 23}, {": 0x", 4}, {"0035520306b8", 16}, {" ***\n", 5}],
> > >> 5) = 71
> > >>
> > >> -
> > >> I have the whole session trace here, I can sent you if needed
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 1/11/07, Lazaro Ferreira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> > Hi,
> > >> >
> > >> > I'm running latest version qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.10
> > >> > But the same problem with previous version qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.7
> > >> >
> > >> > I have made strace like you said this is the output , any ideia ?
> > >> >
> > >> > ...
> > >> > select(1, [0], NULL, NULL, {1200, 0}STARTTLS
> > >> > )   = 1 (in [0], left {1188, 766000})
> > >> > read(0, "STARTTLS\n", 1024) = 9
> > >> > brk(0)  = 0x6bf000
> > >> > brk(0x6e)   = 0x6e
> > >> > open("control/servercert.pem", O_RDONLY) = 3
> > >> > fstat(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=1693, ...}) = 0
> > >> > mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1,
> > >> > 0) = 0x2a95557000
> > >> > read(3, "-BEGIN CERTIFICATE-\nMIIC"..., 4096) = 1693
> > >> > getpid()= 28774
> > >>

Re: [qmailtoaster] clamav-toaster-0.90rc2-1.3.8 / simscan-toaster-1.3.1-1.3.3 upgrade problem

[Erik Espinoza]

The new simscan (v1.3.1-1.3.3) knows about the new clamav system.
Upgrade clamav first, then upgrade simscan.

Thanks,
Erik

On 1/11/07, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Jake Vickers wrote:
> Eric "Shubes" wrote:
>> When I upgrade one toaster from clamav-toaster-0.88.3-1.3.2 and
>> simscan-toaster-1.2-1.3.1 to subject versions I have no problem.
>>
>> When I upgrade another (nearly identical) toaster from
>> clamav-toaster-0.88.7-1.3.7 and simscan-toaster-1.2-1.3.2 to subject
>> versions, I get:
>>  configure: error: Unable to find your clamav databases, specify
>> --enable-clamavdb-path.
>> when simscan's configure script.
>>
>> I look into simscan's configuration, and it's looking for
>> /usr/share/clamav/daily.cvd file. This file exists on the first toaster
>> before and after upgrading clamav. The second toaster has
>> daily.cvd.rpmnew,
>> but also has a daily.inc directory containing:
>>
>>
>> So simscan's configuration is looking for a file that no longer exists?
>> Should it instead be looking for daily.inc directory or daily.cvd file?
>>
>> Any idea why one toaster ended up with daily.cvd file while the other
>> ended
>> up with a daily.inc directory (apparently in its place)?
>>
>> I diff'd the compile output for clamav from each machine and saw no
>> significant differences.
>>
>> Something's gotta be different, but I'm not seeing what's causing it.
>>
> Was the distro's clamav package installed on the second machine instead
> of Toaster's? Or maybe over Toaster's?

Nope. Nice guess though.

I don't get it. There's something happening with clamav I'm not seeing.

In one case, upgrading from 0.88.3-1.3.2 there is no problem.

In another case, I upgraded from 0.88.5-1.3.5 to 0.88.7-1.3.7 on Jan 7, then
yesterday when I try to go from 0.88.7-1.3.6 to 0.90rc2-1.3.8, it creates
this daily.inc directory instead of the daily.cvd file.

I guess I'm just hoping someone already knows something about this daily.inc
directory and can fill me in.

--
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] Stop receiving email from most servers after Qmail update

[Erik Espinoza]

That's not the issue. Those files don't need to exist.

The problem is that qmail-smtpd is attempting to open a tty. Here is
what an strace shows on a working server:

open("control/clientca.pem", O_RDONLY)  = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
open("control/clientcrl.pem", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
open("control/servercert.pem", O_RDONLY) = 5

Looks like something is wrong with one of the libraries that qmail is
linked against. It shouldn't be pulling in a tty interface. Do an ldd
on qmail-smtpd.


Thanks,
Erik


On 1/11/07, Lazaro Ferreira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi,

I have ran strace again this time emulating the real thing (strace
tcpserver then forks qmail-smtpd)

This what happens : it seems like it is looking for files
(clientca.pem and clientcrl.pem ) that doesn't exist there :
-
28887 open("control/clientca.pem", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file
or directory)
28887 open("control/clientcrl.pem", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such
file or directory)
28887 open("/dev/tty", O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK|O_NOCTTY) = -1 ENXIO (No such
device or address)
28887 writev(2, [{"*** glibc detected *** ", 23}, {"free(): invalid
pointer", 23}, {": 0x", 4}, {"0035520306b8", 16}, {" ***\n", 5}],
5) = 71

-
I have the whole session trace here, I can sent you if needed


On 1/11/07, Lazaro Ferreira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running latest version qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.10
> But the same problem with previous version qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.7
>
> I have made strace like you said this is the output , any ideia ?
>
> ...
> select(1, [0], NULL, NULL, {1200, 0}STARTTLS
> )   = 1 (in [0], left {1188, 766000})
> read(0, "STARTTLS\n", 1024) = 9
> brk(0)  = 0x6bf000
> brk(0x6e)   = 0x6e
> open("control/servercert.pem", O_RDONLY) = 3
> fstat(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=1693, ...}) = 0
> mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1,
> 0) = 0x2a95557000
> read(3, "-BEGIN CERTIFICATE-\nMIIC"..., 4096) = 1693
> getpid()= 28774
> read(3, "", 4096)   = 0
> close(3)= 0
> munmap(0x2a95557000, 4096)  = 0
> open("control/clientca.pem", O_RDONLY)  = -1 ENOENT (No such file or 
directory)
> open("control/clientcrl.pem", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or 
directory)
> open("/dev/tty", O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK|O_NOCTTY) = 3
> writev(3, [{"*** glibc detected *** ", 23}, {"free(): invalid
> pointer", 23}, {": 0x", 4}, {"0035520306b8", 16}, {" ***\n", 5}],
> 5*** glibc detected *** free(): invalid pointer: 0x0035520306b8
> ***
> ) = 71
> rt_sigprocmask(SIG_UNBLOCK, [ABRT], NULL, 8) = 0
> tgkill(28774, 28774, SIGABRT)   = 0
> --- SIGABRT (Aborted) @ 0 (0) ---
> +++ killed by SIGABRT +++
> Process 28774 detached
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 1/11/07, Jean-Paul van de Plasse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Guess this is going to be very difficult to figure out this way.
> >
> > Last thing I can think of to get some kind of idea is run a strace on
> > qmail-smtpd
> > Make sure you have strace installed.
> > Then run
> > strace /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd
> >
> > That will give a bunch of data on your screen, wait till it stops with
> > something like
> > select(1, [0], NULL, NULL, {1200, 0}
> > then type
> > starttls
> > (and put an enter after just like you did with telnet)
> >
> > Normally that would give you the last system calls done before crashing.
> > I guess you could do this alot better with gdb but then you need a debug
> > compiled version of qmail-smtpd.
> >
> > I do not know what qmail-toaster version you have installed, but besides
> > that I have exactly the same versions as you.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Eric "Shubes"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: 
> > Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 8:09 PM
> > Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Stop receiving email from most servers after
> > Qmail update
> >
> >
> > > Jake Vickers wrote:
> > >> Lazaro Ferreira wrote:
> > >>> Hi,
> > >>>
> > >>> Interestingly I can send from these servers using telnet qmail_ip 25,
> > >>> but if I try from command line using the command "mail " it produces
> > >>> the gcc error
> > >>>
> > >>> Any ideia or guess is welcome ?
> > >> So if you use a client like Thunderbird or Outlook it works okay? But
> > >> when you try and mail from the command line it gives you the error? Does
> > >> it only do it when you mail from the command line on the Toaster
> > >> machine, or when you send from another host to this machine?
> > >> You may want to check and make sure sendmail has been removed (rpm -qa |
> > >> grep sendmail), and then make sure that Toaster installed the "fake"
> > >> sendmail (/var/qmail/bin/sendmail and /use/sbin/sendmail should just be
> > >> a symlink to the /var/qmail/bin/sendmail one).
> > >>
> > > I think we've determined that the problem lies w

Re: [qmailtoaster] Stop receiving email from most servers after Qmail update

[Erik Espinoza]

Lazaro, is this your first QmailToaster on that machine?

Just on a hunch, can you run memtest to see if there is any memory issue/

Thanks,
Erik

On 1/11/07, Lazaro Ferreira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I will try

On 1/11/07, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you run a trace on it?
> You might find out how to by searching the list archives for STARTTLS.
>
> Lazaro Ferreira wrote:
> > I ran the command then try again same problem
> >
> > I have also read the thread forum you mentioned before, try this :
> >
> > [IP].:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",DKSIGN="/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private"
> > SENDER_NOCHECK =""
> >
> > no success
> >
> > On 1/11/07, Erik Espinoza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Run '/var/qmail/bin/dh_key' and try again.
> >>
> >> Erik
> >>
> >> On 1/11/07, Lazaro Ferreira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > Eric,
> >> >
> >> > Yes, Just the order is changed :
> >> >
> >> > -BEGIN CERTIFICATE-
> >> > -END CERTIFICATE-
> >> > -BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY-
> >> > -END RSA PRIVATE KEY-
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On 1/11/07, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > > So your problem is with TLS.
> >> > >
> >> > > (We had a segfault error a few months back related to STARTTLS.
> >> You might
> >> > > try searching the list archive to see what happened with that, as
> >> I don't
> >> > > recall off hand).
> >> > >
> >> > > Do you have a servercert.pem file similar to this?
> >> > > [root]# ls -l /var/qmail/control/servercert.pem
> >> > > -rw-r-  1 root vchkpw 2396 Oct  7 10:31
> >> /var/qmail/control/servercert.pem
> >> > >
> >> > > Don't show it to us, as that would compromise your security.
> >> > >
> >> > > Does this file look 'normal'? Mine has:
> >> > > -BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY-
> >> > > 
> >> > > -END RSA PRIVATE KEY-
> >> > > -BEGIN CERTIFICATE-
> >> > > 
> >> > > -END CERTIFICATE-
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Lazaro Ferreira wrote:
> >> > > > Yes same error
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On 1/11/07, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > > >> What do you get when you issue the STARTTLS command in telnet?
> >> > > >> Same error, I'm guessing.
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> Lazaro Ferreira wrote:
> >> > > >> > Hi Eric,
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > I have telnet from the same machine using the EHLO command
> >> this is the
> >> > > >> > session info, everything worked OK :
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > telnet my_ip 25
> >> > > >> > Trying my_qmail ...
> >> > > >> > Connected to my_qmail (qmail_ip).
> >> > > >> > Escape character is '^]'.
> >> > > >> > 220 Welcome to ... smtp Server ESMTP
> >> > > >> > EHLO remote_domain
> >> > > >> > 250-Welcome to ... smtp Server
> >> > > >> > 250-STARTTLS
> >> > > >> > 250-PIPELINING
> >> > > >> > 250-8BITMIME
> >> > > >> > 250-SIZE 20971520
> >> > > >> > 250 AUTH LOGIN PLAIN CRAM-MD5
> >> > > >> > MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > > >> > 250 ok
> >> > > >> > RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > > >> > 250 ok
> >> > > >> > DATA
> >> > > >> > 354 go ahead
> >> > > >> > Subject:Test
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > EHLO works ok from telnet
> >> > > >> > .
> >> > > >> > 250 ok 1168529273 qp 18833
> >> > > >> > quit
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > On 1/11/07, Lazaro Ferreira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > > >> >> Lo

Re: [qmailtoaster] Stop receiving email from most servers after Qmail update

[Erik Espinoza]

Run '/var/qmail/bin/dh_key' and try again.

Erik

On 1/11/07, Lazaro Ferreira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Eric,

Yes, Just the order is changed :

-BEGIN CERTIFICATE-
-END CERTIFICATE-
-BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY-
-END RSA PRIVATE KEY-


On 1/11/07, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So your problem is with TLS.
>
> (We had a segfault error a few months back related to STARTTLS. You might
> try searching the list archive to see what happened with that, as I don't
> recall off hand).
>
> Do you have a servercert.pem file similar to this?
> [root]# ls -l /var/qmail/control/servercert.pem
> -rw-r-  1 root vchkpw 2396 Oct  7 10:31 /var/qmail/control/servercert.pem
>
> Don't show it to us, as that would compromise your security.
>
> Does this file look 'normal'? Mine has:
> -BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY-
> 
> -END RSA PRIVATE KEY-
> -BEGIN CERTIFICATE-
> 
> -END CERTIFICATE-
>
>
> Lazaro Ferreira wrote:
> > Yes same error
> >
> > On 1/11/07, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> What do you get when you issue the STARTTLS command in telnet?
> >> Same error, I'm guessing.
> >>
> >> Lazaro Ferreira wrote:
> >> > Hi Eric,
> >> >
> >> > I have telnet from the same machine using the EHLO command this is the
> >> > session info, everything worked OK :
> >> >
> >> > telnet my_ip 25
> >> > Trying my_qmail ...
> >> > Connected to my_qmail (qmail_ip).
> >> > Escape character is '^]'.
> >> > 220 Welcome to ... smtp Server ESMTP
> >> > EHLO remote_domain
> >> > 250-Welcome to ... smtp Server
> >> > 250-STARTTLS
> >> > 250-PIPELINING
> >> > 250-8BITMIME
> >> > 250-SIZE 20971520
> >> > 250 AUTH LOGIN PLAIN CRAM-MD5
> >> > MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > 250 ok
> >> > RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > 250 ok
> >> > DATA
> >> > 354 go ahead
> >> > Subject:Test
> >> >
> >> > EHLO works ok from telnet
> >> > .
> >> > 250 ok 1168529273 qp 18833
> >> > quit
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On 1/11/07, Lazaro Ferreira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >> Looking more through recordio, I have notice that either remote host
> >> >> (out of my ISP) or direct telnet against the qmail smtp server,
> >> >> generate a HELO command that works ok, however the emails sent using
> >> >> command line "mail" command from our webserver (within our ISP
> >> >> network) generate a EHLO command (smtp Authentication I guess) why ?
> >> >>
> >> >> How can I setup my qmail to override this behaviour ?
> >> >>
> >> >> Thank you
> >> >>
> >> >> On 1/11/07, Lazaro Ferreira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >> > Hi Eric,
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Thank you four your help
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I've logged on to remote host using ssh, then i have issue a "mail"
> >> >> commad
> >> >> > below the smtp log file with recordio :
> >> >> >
> >> >> > @400045a64e7f2fa04c84 17952 > 220 Welcome to ... smtp Server
> >> ESMTP
> >> >> > @400045a64e7f2fa4386c 17952 < EHLO remote_host
> >> >> > @400045a64e7f2fa4b56c 17952 > 250-Welcome to ... smtp Server
> >> >> > @400045a64e7f2fa4b954 17952 > 250-STARTTLS
> >> >> > @400045a64e7f2fa4bd3c 17952 > 250-PIPELINING
> >> >> > @400045a64e7f2fa4d4ac 17952 > 250-8BITMIME
> >> >> > @400045a64e7f2fa4d894 17952 > 250-SIZE 20971520
> >> >> > @400045a64e7f2fa4d894 17952 > 250 AUTH LOGIN PLAIN CRAM-MD5
> >> >> > @400045a64e7f2fb92f9c 17952 < STARTTLS
> >> >> > @400045a64e7f2fc02cac *** glibc detected *** free(): invalid
> >> >> > pointer: 0x0035520306b8 ***
> >> >> > @400045a64e7f2fc2cc8c 17952 > [EOF]
> >> >> > @400045a64e7f2fc32664 tcpserver: end 17952 status 6
> >> >> >
> >> >> > is the problem related to SMTP Auth ?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Thank you
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Lazaro
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On 1/11/07, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >> > > recordio is a neat little program that comes with
> >> >> ucspi-tcp-toaster. When
> >> >> > > you plug it into the smtp (or any other for that matter) process,
> >> >> it records
> >> >> > > all of the input/output of the smtp session to the smtp log. Note,
> >> >> it can
> >> >> > > grow your log quite rapidly on a busy server, so you don't want to
> >> >> leave it
> >> >> > > on for a long period of time.
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > To enable recordio, modify your /var/qmail/supervise/smtp/run file
> >> >> as follows:
> >> >> > > exec /usr/bin/softlimit -m 1200 \
> >> >> > > /usr/bin/tcpserver -v -R -H -l $HOSTNAME -x $TCP_CDB -c
> >> >> "$MAXSMTPD" \
> >> >> > > -u "$QMAILDUID" -g "$NOFILESGID" 0 smtp \
> >> >> > > /usr/bin/recordio \
> >> >> > > $RBLSMTPD $BLACKLIST $SMTPD $VCHKPW /bin/true 2>&1
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > Note, we simply added the next to last line here, leaving
> >> >> everything else as
> >> >> > > is. Then
> >> >> > > # qmailctl restart
> >> >> > > to restart the smtp process, and run a test. You'll see the
> >> >> details of the
> >> >> > > smtp session in the smtp log file (current). Once you have a
> >> >> sampling,
> >> >> > > r

Re: [qmailtoaster] Earlier Modules

[Erik Espinoza]

Hi Jakin,

The only difference between qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.9.src.rpm and the
current release on the main site is that you can enable an extra
patch, namely srs. By merely not enabling the patch with "--define
'srs 1'", you are building the same package as you would have if you
started with qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.9.src.rpm.

That said, no there isn't a copy available for download of the previous version.

Thanks,
Erik

On 1/10/07, Jakin Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Is there a link to download an earlier verious module?

I lost my copy of qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.9.src.rpm

Regards

Jakin Lee


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] UPDATED PACKAGES: clamav-toaster, squirrelmail-toaster, simscan-toaster, maildrop-toaster, courier-authlib-toaster, courier-imap-toaster

[Erik Espinoza]

No.

On 1/10/07, slamp slamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Since there is now a new maildrop package which i assume has the mailfilter
spam support, should the qmailadmin be modified so it defaults with --define
'spambox 1'?


On 1/10/07, slamp slamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I meant safe*
>
>
>
> On 1/10/07, slamp slamp < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I guess its same to assume that clamav 0.90rc2 is stable?
> >
> >
> >
> > On 1/10/07, Eric Shubes < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Thanks a bunch. Those are great enhancements!
> > >
> > > Erik Espinoza wrote:
> > > > Done.
> > > >
> > > > On 1/10/07, Erik Espinoza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >> I'll put the latest, 1.3.10, which will not build with srs support
by
> > > >> default.
> > > >>
> > > >> On 1/10/07, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >> > Erik Espinoza wrote:
> > > >> > > Greetings,
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > The following packages (clamav-toaster, squirrelmail-toaster,
> > > >> > > simscan-toaster, maildrop-toaster, courier-authlib-toaster,
> > > >> > > courier-imap-toaster) have graduated from devel to the main
site.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > I will be moving the new qmail-toaster and libsrs2-toaster in
about a
> > > >> > > weeks time.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Thanks,
> > > >> > > Erik
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > EE,
> > > >> > Can you put up a version of qmail-toaster on the main site that
> > > >> includes MSA
> > > >> > and Alexey's patches but w/out srs? (1.3.9 or ?)
> > > >> >
> > > >> > --
> > > >> > -Eric 'shubes'
> > > >> >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > -Eric 'shubes'
> > >
> > >
-
> > >  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted < http://www.vr.org>
> > >
-
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] UPDATED PACKAGES: clamav-toaster, squirrelmail-toaster, simscan-toaster, maildrop-toaster, courier-authlib-toaster, courier-imap-toaster

[Erik Espinoza]

Yes.

On 1/10/07, slamp slamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I guess its same to assume that clamav 0.90rc2 is stable?


On 1/10/07, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks a bunch. Those are great enhancements!
>
> Erik Espinoza wrote:
> > Done.
> >
> > On 1/10/07, Erik Espinoza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I'll put the latest, 1.3.10, which will not build with srs support by
> >> default.
> >>
> >> On 1/10/07, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > Erik Espinoza wrote:
> >> > > Greetings,
> >> > >
> >> > > The following packages (clamav-toaster, squirrelmail-toaster,
> >> > > simscan-toaster, maildrop-toaster, courier-authlib-toaster,
> >> > > courier-imap-toaster) have graduated from devel to the main site.
> >> > >
> >> > > I will be moving the new qmail-toaster and libsrs2-toaster in about
a
> >> > > weeks time.
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks,
> >> > > Erik
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > EE,
> >> > Can you put up a version of qmail-toaster on the main site that
> >> includes MSA
> >> > and Alexey's patches but w/out srs? (1.3.9 or ?)
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > -Eric 'shubes'
> >> >
>
>
> --
> -Eric 'shubes'
>
>
-
>  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
>
-
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] UPDATED PACKAGES: clamav-toaster, squirrelmail-toaster, simscan-toaster, maildrop-toaster, courier-authlib-toaster, courier-imap-toaster

[Erik Espinoza]

Done.

On 1/10/07, Erik Espinoza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I'll put the latest, 1.3.10, which will not build with srs support by default.

On 1/10/07, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Erik Espinoza wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > The following packages (clamav-toaster, squirrelmail-toaster,
> > simscan-toaster, maildrop-toaster, courier-authlib-toaster,
> > courier-imap-toaster) have graduated from devel to the main site.
> >
> > I will be moving the new qmail-toaster and libsrs2-toaster in about a
> > weeks time.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Erik
> >
>
> EE,
> Can you put up a version of qmail-toaster on the main site that includes MSA
> and Alexey's patches but w/out srs? (1.3.9 or ?)
>
> --
> -Eric 'shubes'
>
> -
>  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>



-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] UPDATED PACKAGES: clamav-toaster, squirrelmail-toaster, simscan-toaster, maildrop-toaster, courier-authlib-toaster, courier-imap-toaster

[Erik Espinoza]

I'll put the latest, 1.3.10, which will not build with srs support by default.

On 1/10/07, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Erik Espinoza wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> The following packages (clamav-toaster, squirrelmail-toaster,
> simscan-toaster, maildrop-toaster, courier-authlib-toaster,
> courier-imap-toaster) have graduated from devel to the main site.
>
> I will be moving the new qmail-toaster and libsrs2-toaster in about a
> weeks time.
>
> Thanks,
> Erik
>

EE,
Can you put up a version of qmail-toaster on the main site that includes MSA
and Alexey's patches but w/out srs? (1.3.9 or ?)

--
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[qmailtoaster] UPDATED PACKAGES: clamav-toaster, squirrelmail-toaster, simscan-toaster, maildrop-toaster, courier-authlib-toaster, courier-imap-toaster

[Erik Espinoza]

Greetings,

The following packages (clamav-toaster, squirrelmail-toaster,
simscan-toaster, maildrop-toaster, courier-authlib-toaster,
courier-imap-toaster) have graduated from devel to the main site.

I will be moving the new qmail-toaster and libsrs2-toaster in about a
weeks time.

Thanks,
Erik

-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] PBL now active in zen.spamhaus.org

[Erik Espinoza]

Testing on that feature is long over, and all of the packages on devel
are to be considered stable.

I haven't had a chance to rewrite the docs, scripts and things
necessary to move the packages from the devel site to the primary.

For example, srs documentation. qmailmrtg, install doc (needs to add
libsrs2-toaster), install scripts and so forth.

I hope to have time this weekend to finish all of this stuff up.

Thanks,
Erik

On 1/10/07, Quinn Comendant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:58:33 -0800, Quinn Comendant wrote:
> So, how is testing of the mail submission port 487 addition to
> qmail-toatser going? ;P

I meant port 587.

And qmail-toadster.

Q


-
Strangecode :: Internet Consultancy
http://www.strangecode.com/
+1 530 624 4410

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] How to prevent email deletion via POP3

[Erik Espinoza]

There is no way to do this without hiring a team of coders to re-write
the pop3 server for you to ignore deletes, yet not show duplicates
once they've been downloaded. Otherwise the client will keep
downloading the same messages as new.

Either that, or get people to change their default settings. Between
the two, i think the second option would be better.

Erik

On 1/10/07, Trung Pham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi all,

My company wants to prevent people from deleting email via POP3.

The problem is that by default, outlook express will delete all emails
after it downloaded them. This is something that we have no control over,
nor can we force the users to switch to another email client.

So do you know if there is a way to make the POP3 server to ignore all the
delete request from the client?

Very much appreciate your help. Thanks.


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] NOP0FCHECK="1"

[Erik Espinoza]

The new simscan has support for passive operating system checking.
This will allow you to block Windows machines with broken reverse dns
or something.

This, however, requires the p0f daemon installed and running. I am not
planning on making this daemon a part of the QmailToaster. As such, I
have disabled this functionality.

Thanks,
Erik

On 1/10/07, Philip Nix Guru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hello
sorry if I missed the answer (couldnt find it on the mail archive)
What does this option do again in the tcp.smtp file

NOP0FCHECK="1"

Thx for the answer
-Philip

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] send problem fixed

[Erik Espinoza]

In general, the development and serious testing happens on multiple
distros (centos4, fc6, and soon opensuse) on a machine running OpenVZ
provided by Lightspeed Wireless (they've really helped the development
of this project).

By the time it's on the devel site, the packages have undergone some
serious testing, so it's fairly safe. Everything on the devel site
right now is considered stable, just that I have not had time to move
things over to the main site, as I'd have to edit all of the install
scripts to include libsrs2-toaster and so forth.

Best bet, if you're going to build a server today, include the devel updates.

Thanks,
Erik

On 1/10/07, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

David Milholen wrote:
> So, should I upgrade my whole package? or just the qmail part?

That depends on how critical the server is. The development packages are
generally very stable, but there is still a (slightly) higher risk of
running into a problem with them than with the stable ones. If you're
upgrading from stable, I would do the whole toaster.

I think that EE's planning on rolling the devel packages over to stable w/in
the next week or so. He might have a better recommendation.

> Maybe it will give me a leg up to install the large server patch.
> I really think i need it because I have the one customer that has a legit
> business for sending about 6000 msgs at one time.

I'm not familiar with the large server patch. Anyone care to elaborate?

>  I am even thinking of setting up another dedicated qmail server for
> failover purposes.

That's always a good idea for a critical server. You can see
http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/QMT_Failover_replication_Setup for
one way to do this. I'm presently working on an automated failover setup
that uses heartbeat.

>> David Milholen wrote:
>>> I emptied my blacklists file and all is well but may have issues with
>>> spam
>>> like I did not before:(
>>>
>> You might try the loose blacklist from the (latest, 0.2.3-1.3.5)
>> qmailtoaster-plus package. It's been working nicely for me for several
>> weeks
>> now (thanks to Vince).
>>
>> It appears that your send problem is RBL related. The qmail-toaster
>> package
>> in development (beginning with version 1.3.8 if I'm not mistaken) has a
>> separate MSA (qmail-smtp) instance running on port 587 (the submission
>> port)
>> for sending emails. This should fix your problem permanently.
>>
>> --
>> -Eric 'shubes'
>>


--
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] qmailtoaster-plus 0.2.4-1.3.5 released

[Erik Espinoza]

Nice Job ES


On 1/10/07, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Bug is fixed in new release 0.2.5-1.3.7

Thanks Sérgio.

P.S. This subject should have read 0.2.4-1.3.6!

Eric "Shubes" wrote:
> Oops!
> Don't'cha love it when programs find their own bugs? ;)
> That's indeed a bug. I'll get right on it.
>
> Sérgio Costa wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> theres a problem on new qtp-newmodel when select development packages
>>
>> Do you want to select libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-1.4.1.src.rpm from
>> Development?
>> Shall we continue? (yes, no|skip, batch, quit) [y] / n|s / b / q : s
>> qtp-newmodel - program bug - stable package libsrs2-toaster not found
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Sérgio
>>
>
>


--
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] Whitelist

[Erik Espinoza]

Hi Roxanne,

This is part of the simscan documentation. Basically you put it in
/var/qmail/control/simcontrol. Once done, simply type "service qmail cdb".

http://www.qmailwiki.org/Simscan/README#Enable_Per_Domain_processing

Edit the /var/qmail/control/simcontrol text file You can enable/disable
clam/spam/trophie/attachments per domain and per user and set a default for
the whole machine.

Here is an example:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] user]$ cat /var/qmail/control/simcontrol
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:clam=yes,spam=no,attach=.txt:.com
example.com:clam=no,spam=yes,attach=.mp3
:clam=yes,spam=yes,trophie=yes,spam_hits=20.1


Thanks,
Erik

On 1/10/07, Roxanne Sandesara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I am assuming it is possible to set up a list of addresses from whom
email should never be rejected as SPAM, regardless of what the
blacklists and Spamassassin say otherwise. But I cannot seem to find
in the documentation where such a list does or should reside, or what
format it should be in. Can someone please either tell me where and
how such a thing should be added (and whatever commands I have to
issue so that toaster will start looking there), or where I can find
the documentation that will tell me how to do it?

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] No Spamassassin on new toaster.

[Erik Espinoza]

These files are now on the main site.

Erik

On 1/10/07, Jake Vickers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have my new toaster up and running and have restored my email and users
> with Jake's backup and restore scripts.  I commented out the djbdns and
> spamassassin parts of the scripts as I don't use djbdns and the
> spamassassin parts seemed to cause error messages on previous attempts.
>
> I now have my folders restored with the email from the previous box and
> also have spam folders back too.  I have noticed that there is no spam
> accumulating ,at least not in the spam folder... :-(  . I'd be grateful
> for any advice about spamassassin configuration so I can get this working
> again.
>
To get this functionality back, you have to recompile maildrop and
qmailadmin with the spambox option:

> From the website:

10/28/2006 - Updated maildrop and qmailadmin package to include fixed
mailfilter. Build qmailadmin with "--define 'spambox 1'" to include
qmailadmin support for the new mailfilter. (Thanks to Mark Samples)

I think you may still need to get these files from the devel site - not
sure if they've been moved into the main trunk or not
(devel.qmailtoaster.com)





-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] slow setup

[Erik Espinoza]

I meant going to the site without the www (ie
http://qmailtoaster.com/) will bring up a password prompt.

On 1/10/07, Erik Espinoza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Nothing is wrong with http://www.qmailtoaster.com/

However, going to the site without qmailtoaster.com is an issue.

Erik

On 1/10/07, Kisakye Alex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi People
> AM trying to build a new toaster here but the packages are coming down very
> very slow??? Anything the matter with the qmailtoaster.com site??
> my distro Fedora 5
>
> ALex



-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] slow setup

[Erik Espinoza]

Nothing is wrong with http://www.qmailtoaster.com/

However, going to the site without qmailtoaster.com is an issue.

Erik

On 1/10/07, Kisakye Alex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



Hi People
AM trying to build a new toaster here but the packages are coming down very
very slow??? Anything the matter with the qmailtoaster.com site??
my distro Fedora 5

ALex


-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] How to Stop Image SPAM

[Erik Espinoza]

You can add .jpg, .png and .gif to simcontrol. But then no images will
make it through.

Erik

On 1/9/07, ashok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:





Dear all,,



Can somebody post me tips to stop Image SPAM.




Ashok Reddy D P
   System Administrator Linux, Irix






-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] Any spam box?

[Erik Espinoza]

From the website:


10/28/2006 - Updated maildrop and qmailadmin package to include fixed
mailfilter. Build qmailadmin with "--define 'spambox 1'" to include
qmailadmin support for the new mailfilter. (Thanks to Mark Samples)

When you built qmailadmin, did you include the "--define 'spambox 1'".
Also make sure you are using the latest maildrop-toaster package, or
else you will have a faulty mailfilter.

Thanks,
Erik

On 1/9/07, Aldi Mmm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Is there any apm box option in this 12/18/2006 edition?
I've already rebuild the qmailadmin, but still no spam check box in email
settings..


-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] How to disable SRS?

[Erik Espinoza]

You can't. That's why we made it optional.

On 1/9/07, Jakin Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


How to disable the SRS if compiled with SRS enabled?

Regards

--
Jakin Lee
See-Thru Data Systems Ltd.
Hong Kong

Tel : +852.28733883
Skype : seethru.jakin


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] qmailtoaster-plus 0.2.4-1.3.5 released

[Erik Espinoza]

Hey ES,

The reason that qmail-toaster requires a compile time option is because:
1) Not everyone is going to configure SRS
2) SRS can complicate things, thus I want to ensure admin's know they
are turning it on.
3) The SRS patch can't be runtime disabled. This WILL cause unexpected
issues if one doesn't configure SRS at all.

Thanks,
Erik

On 1/9/07, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Sounds good.

Is there any reason why someone would want to disable srs? If so, can it be
disabled even though qmail-toaster was compiled with it on and
libsrs2-toaster is installed? What should the default (stock) toaster be? It
seems to me that having srs enabled with libsrs2-toaster as a required
dependency would be the simplest (and best) way to do it. Perhaps I'm
missing something.

Erik Espinoza wrote:
> If qmail-toaster is compiled with srs enabled, it requires that
> libsrs2-toaster be installed.
>
> I have updated the current.txt on the devel site to show
> libsrs2-toaster before the the qmail-toaster package.
>
> Thanks,
> Erik
>
> On 1/9/07, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Sounds good. I'm guessing you can handle whatever dependencies in the
>> spec
>> file. Let me know when it's in there and I'll remove that code from
>> newmodel
>> (no big deal).
>>
>> I'll tackle working anything special for srs into newmodel at some
>> point in
>> the future. It'll handle installing the new package once it's in the
>> current.txt list. I'm just not sure about any other requirements yet.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Erik Espinoza wrote:
>> > Hi Eric,
>> >
>> > I left it optional, as it requires the maildrop-toaster be updated as
>> > well. I think spambox can be made a default in a future release with
>> > the ability to turn it off.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Erik
>> >
>> > On 1/9/07, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> Nope.
>> >>
>> >> For spambox, it unconditionally adds that parameter for the
>> >> qmailadmin-toaster package. I haven't added anything for srs yet.
>> >>
>> >> I kinda figured that it wouldn't hurt to have spambox as a default. Is
>> >> there
>> >> a reason why someone wouldn't want it?
>> >>
>> >> If these need to be optional (I can see where srs might need to be)
>> >> let me
>> >> know and I'll "make it so".
>> >>
>> >> BTW, neither qtp-newmodel nor qtp-ami-up2date will 'see' srs until you
>> >> add
>> >> it to the current.txt file. ;)
>> >>
>> >> Erik Espinoza wrote:
>> >> > Hey Eric,
>> >> >
>> >> > Does it ask questions for spambox/srs when building/upgrading the
>> >> > qmailadmin/qmail-toaster packages?
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On 1/9/07, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >> qtp-ami-up2date now handles >< release numbers properly. I also
>> added
>> >> >> a "-d"
>> >> >>  (or -dev or -devel) flag for including checking the devel packages
>> >> (in
>> >> >> addition to checking the stable site).
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Documentation forthcoming.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> NJoy!
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> -Eric 'shubes'
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> -Eric 'shubes'
>> >>
>> >> -
>> >>  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
>> >> -
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> > -
>> > QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
>> > -
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > For additional commands, e-mail:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> -Eric 'shubes'
>>


--
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] qmailtoaster-plus 0.2.4-1.3.5 released

[Erik Espinoza]

If qmail-toaster is compiled with srs enabled, it requires that
libsrs2-toaster be installed.

I have updated the current.txt on the devel site to show
libsrs2-toaster before the the qmail-toaster package.

Thanks,
Erik

On 1/9/07, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Sounds good. I'm guessing you can handle whatever dependencies in the spec
file. Let me know when it's in there and I'll remove that code from newmodel
(no big deal).

I'll tackle working anything special for srs into newmodel at some point in
the future. It'll handle installing the new package once it's in the
current.txt list. I'm just not sure about any other requirements yet.

Thanks!

Erik Espinoza wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> I left it optional, as it requires the maildrop-toaster be updated as
> well. I think spambox can be made a default in a future release with
> the ability to turn it off.
>
> Thanks,
> Erik
>
> On 1/9/07, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Nope.
>>
>> For spambox, it unconditionally adds that parameter for the
>> qmailadmin-toaster package. I haven't added anything for srs yet.
>>
>> I kinda figured that it wouldn't hurt to have spambox as a default. Is
>> there
>> a reason why someone wouldn't want it?
>>
>> If these need to be optional (I can see where srs might need to be)
>> let me
>> know and I'll "make it so".
>>
>> BTW, neither qtp-newmodel nor qtp-ami-up2date will 'see' srs until you
>> add
>> it to the current.txt file. ;)
>>
>> Erik Espinoza wrote:
>> > Hey Eric,
>> >
>> > Does it ask questions for spambox/srs when building/upgrading the
>> > qmailadmin/qmail-toaster packages?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On 1/9/07, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> qtp-ami-up2date now handles >< release numbers properly. I also added
>> >> a "-d"
>> >>  (or -dev or -devel) flag for including checking the devel packages
>> (in
>> >> addition to checking the stable site).
>> >>
>> >> Documentation forthcoming.
>> >>
>> >> NJoy!
>> >> --
>> >> -Eric 'shubes'
>> >>
>>
>>
>> --
>> -Eric 'shubes'
>>
>> -
>>  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>
> -
> QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


--
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] qmailtoaster-plus 0.2.4-1.3.5 released

[Erik Espinoza]

Hi Eric,

I left it optional, as it requires the maildrop-toaster be updated as
well. I think spambox can be made a default in a future release with
the ability to turn it off.

Thanks,
Erik

On 1/9/07, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Nope.

For spambox, it unconditionally adds that parameter for the
qmailadmin-toaster package. I haven't added anything for srs yet.

I kinda figured that it wouldn't hurt to have spambox as a default. Is there
a reason why someone wouldn't want it?

If these need to be optional (I can see where srs might need to be) let me
know and I'll "make it so".

BTW, neither qtp-newmodel nor qtp-ami-up2date will 'see' srs until you add
it to the current.txt file. ;)

Erik Espinoza wrote:
> Hey Eric,
>
> Does it ask questions for spambox/srs when building/upgrading the
> qmailadmin/qmail-toaster packages?
>
>
>
> On 1/9/07, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> qtp-ami-up2date now handles >< release numbers properly. I also added
>> a "-d"
>>  (or -dev or -devel) flag for including checking the devel packages (in
>> addition to checking the stable site).
>>
>> Documentation forthcoming.
>>
>> NJoy!
>> --
>> -Eric 'shubes'
>>


--
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] qmailtoaster-plus 0.2.4-1.3.5 released

[Erik Espinoza]

Hey Eric,

Does it ask questions for spambox/srs when building/upgrading the
qmailadmin/qmail-toaster packages?



On 1/9/07, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

qtp-ami-up2date now handles >< release numbers properly. I also added a "-d"
 (or -dev or -devel) flag for including checking the devel packages (in
addition to checking the stable site).

Documentation forthcoming.

NJoy!
--
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] Can't send email with new toaster

[Erik Espinoza]

Make sure you have smtp-auth enabled on the client, or that you have
specified 'RELAYCLIENT=""' for the machine trying to relay through
your Toaster.

Erik

On 1/9/07, Mark Piekos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I've managed to build a new toaster on CentOS 4.4 and incoming mail is
arriving and readable ok.  When I try to send an email, either to myself
or outside, I get an error message 'no valid mx record for domain'.  I
built the toaster with djbdns as I have a couple DNS servers in my own
domain.  If I switch back to the original server it can send fine.  I
notice that my original server has mDNSresponder running.  Do I need to
install djbdns or is there a config file in the toaster to tell it where
to go for DNS lookups?

Many thanks in advance for your help,

Kind regards,

Mark.


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] vchcpw-pop3

[Erik Espinoza]

POP3-SSL isn't deprecated.

Most clients don't know how to do POP3-TLS, but definitely know how to
do POP3-SSL.

It's only SMTP-SSL that's been deprecated in favor of SMTP-TLS.

Erik

On 1/9/07, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Dan Herbon wrote:
> Thank you
>
> Any docs on setting up either POP3-SSL or POP3-TLS? I know nothing about pop
> or smtp SSL. Same type of certificate required that I'd use for a webserver?

Yes.
See http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Certificate
Use POP3-TLS, as POP3-SSL is depreciated.


> Dan
>

--
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] Recovering info from old versions

[Erik Espinoza]

Hi Fernando


In the original machines Horde-Toaster was still used as webmail and now
SquirrelMail is the choice. The isse is that in horde there was a lot of
notes stored that my client wants to recover/import into squirrel. Does
anyone know where that info is stored and how to retrieve it?


The QmailToaster distributed Horde package didn't do anything but
check e-mail. There were instructions to add support for addressbook
and so on, but they required a mysql backend and had to be configured
by the admin, thus could be anything.

You will probably find them if you log in with phpMyAdmin and poke
around, so long as you log in as root.


Also, is there any way we can bulk import e-mail addresses from some file
format into the SquirrelMail?


If you write a parser to take each column, I would expect so as
SquirrelMail stores all this stuff in plain text under
/var/lib/squirrelmail/prefs/. This will require some scripting and
serious debugging.

Thanks,
Erik

-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Re[2]: [qmailtoaster] Domainkeys, mailing lists and rejects

[Erik Espinoza]

You are correct. It took me forever to determine that, as it is no
longer optional on DKIM. DKIM is the new replacement for DomainKeys,
based on the same technology.

Erik

On 1/9/07, Alexey Loukianov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Greetings, Erik.

4 января 2007 г., 20:56:59 you have wrote:

> I think the problem may be with the qmail-dk not setting an h= line
> limiting what is signed.

> Forwarded Gmail messages still show up as DomainKey-Status good, but
> e-mails generated by the QmailToaster do not.

> It looks like we don't have full compliance with the spec.
Well, we ARE compliant to the specs. It is up to MTA to decide,
whether to use part of headers or the whole headers to sign a message.

In any case, that is on my TODO list to rewrite qmail-dk to use only
part of headers to sign a message. I hadn't decided yet how to
determine what header fields to use, will think about it a bit later,
just before implementing it in a new version of qmail-dk.

--
Best Regards,
 Alexey Loukianov  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Software Development Department,
Lavtech Corp
http://mnogo.ru, http://lavtech.ru


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] Sending mail suddendly slooooow!!!

[Erik Espinoza]

I'd prefer the wishlist be added to the wiki. I've been very busy as
of late with the QmailToaster. I think I'll be moving the courier
packages over by early next week and shortly afterwards will be moving
the rest.

Thanks,
Erik

On 1/9/07, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Jake Vickers wrote:
> Jean-Paul van de Plasse wrote:
>> Seems there are quite some problems with this today/last night.
>> If I am not mistaken the timeout is default 60 secs per rbl, normally
>> one would think this would not give to much problems. But then again
>> if your timeout on the client side is lowish and 1 or 2 are not
>> working you will get this kind of problems/slowness..
>> Maybe we could incorporate this patch
>> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/123473
>> since that looks at the total time of the rblsmtp session instead of
>> per blacklist.
>> Must be fairly easy to patch this, but would like to hear what you
>> guys think about it.
> I thought Eric Shubes did a trace on it and found that it was at a 5
> minute timeout. I'm probably wrong, though.

I think that you're remembering smtp timeouts, not rbl timeouts. smtp
timeouts vary by server, and are typically 5 or 10 minutes.

> I did write a script that checks the response times on blacklists and
> adjusts your blacklists file accordingly. It's on my site. I haven't
> gotten any feedback about it, so I'm assuming no one had any problems.
> It's almost a moot point with the submission port though. If you use the
> submission port that will stop the client timeouts (assuming you opened
> the port in your firewall) since the submission port doesn't do any BL
> checks on IP addresses.

I intend to get this script (a very nice one I might add) included in
qmailtoaster-plus. None the less, I think these patches would be a valuable
addition to the stock toaster. I know that EE's been very busy lately, but
perhaps they can be added to the 'wish list'.

--
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] DEVEL PACKAGE: squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.9a-1.3.5.src.rpm

[Erik Espinoza]

I didn't know it was. I didn't have to restart apache on my side.

On 1/9/07, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Is a restart of apache *required* for this upgrade for some reason? If so,
I'd like to include that in qtp-newmodel processing.

Erik Espinoza wrote:
> Thanks for updating us quickly about this. Had me worried for a minute. . .
>
> Erik
>
> On 1/8/07, slamp slamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> i guess it was just me. restarted apache and it worked, don't know why i
>> needed to do that though.
>>
>>
>> On 1/8/07, slamp slamp < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > is it just me or this rpm is borked?
>> >
>> > when i login it's stuck on webmail/src/redirect.php
>> >
>> > [client 192.168.1.50] PHP Fatal error:  Call to undefined function:
>> getpref() in /usr/share/squirrelmail/src/redirect.php on
>> line 127, referer:
>> https://www.MYDOMAIN.com/webmail/src/login.php
>> >
>> > using centos 4.4
>> >
>> >
>> > On 1/8/07, CanopyAdmin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Eric "Shubes" wrote:
>> > > >> If we do an upgrade like this, do we  rpm --upgrade sort of thing?
>> > > >> Or --delete the old and --install the new?
>> > > >>
>> > > >> +
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >
>> > > > If you hang on for a day or so, qtp-newmodel will handle
>> upgrades from
>> > > > development for you. I'm doing final testing now, and the next
>> release
>> of
>> > > > qmailtoaster-plus should be available either later today or
>> tomorrow
>> > >
>> > > Oh, okay ... makes me giggle!  :)
>> > >
>> > > +
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >


--
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] problem sending mail..hep me plz

[Erik Espinoza]

Hey Vince,

That saupdates.openprotect.com site is great for blocking spam.

Thank you for that gem.

Erik

On 1/8/07, Vince Callaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 21:39 -0600, David Milholen wrote:
>  I found it a link in the blacklist was not responding.. I think it was
> relay.orbs or somin like that.
>  I am going to goto jays site and read about how to annihilate evil spam:)
> Thanks

This is the contents of my blacklist file:
-r dnsbl.tqmcube.com -r dnsbl.sorbs.net -r sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org -r
bl.spamcop.net -r cbl.abuseat.org -r dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net -r
dnsbl-2.uceprotect.net -r dnsbl-3.uceprotect.net -r combined.njabl.org

tqmcube.com blocks about 80% of the garbage.  Mostly because it blocks
CN and KR ips.  Sorbs grabs about 10%  uceprotect catches the last bit
and then spamassasin kicks in.  spamhaus and spamcop are either
redundant or not doing much for me.  I'll probably remove them.

Don't forget sa-update and check out saupdates.openprotect.com



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] limitting pop3 and smtp file size

[Erik Espinoza]

Paste your databytes file. I want to verify this.

Erik

On 1/8/07, Isianto Istiadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Dear Erik,
Thanks for you answer
First of all sorry for my english
What I mean is I want to restrict the size of email being sent and
recieved. when I use databyte only an email being received is being
applied. But my client (using outlook) can still send email bigger
than 2 Mb (I put 2Mb in databyte).

Thanks
Isianto


On 1/7/07, Erik Espinoza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You can't send e-mail using pop3. The /var/qmail/control/databytes
> should be global.
>
> On 1/7/07, Isianto Istiadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >  Is there any way to limit the email file size when sending to using pop3 in
> > qmail? As I recall for smtp I use DATABYTE.
> >  Thank you
> >
> >
>
> -
>  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] problem sending mail..hep me plz

[Erik Espinoza]

Sounds like perhaps you have SELinux enabled.

On 1/8/07, David Milholen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

ok, Im kinda noob around this so bare with me.

 I brought my server down for maintance today.
The server has centos 4.3 with complete qmail-toaster package.
 I brought it back on line and could not send mail. Let me explain the
sending part. I can send but you either use the squirrelmail or click the
send button a few times on some other mail client like T-bird or outlook.
I takes a couple of minutes to finnaly go thru. I believe I did get an
error 342 at one time when sending from squirrelmail. Using the web to
send will take a few minutes also.
 I tried to telnet from a dos prompt to port 25 and it just said "it could
not open connection".
 I tried it from the localhost on the server and it said "x.x.x.x/port25:
Servname not supported for ai_socktype"
 I do have a blacklist.
Any Ideas??



--
Wireless Etc
David Milholen
Lead Coordinator
Phone:(501)318-1300
Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web:www.wletc.com



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] DEVEL PACKAGE: squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.9a-1.3.5.src.rpm

[Erik Espinoza]

Thanks for updating us quickly about this. Had me worried for a minute. . .

Erik

On 1/8/07, slamp slamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

i guess it was just me. restarted apache and it worked, don't know why i
needed to do that though.


On 1/8/07, slamp slamp < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> is it just me or this rpm is borked?
>
> when i login it's stuck on webmail/src/redirect.php
>
> [client 192.168.1.50] PHP Fatal error:  Call to undefined function:
getpref() in /usr/share/squirrelmail/src/redirect.php on
line 127, referer:
https://www.MYDOMAIN.com/webmail/src/login.php
>
> using centos 4.4
>
>
> On 1/8/07, CanopyAdmin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Eric "Shubes" wrote:
> > >> If we do an upgrade like this, do we  rpm --upgrade sort of thing?
> > >> Or --delete the old and --install the new?
> > >>
> > >> +
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > > If you hang on for a day or so, qtp-newmodel will handle upgrades from
> > > development for you. I'm doing final testing now, and the next release
of
> > > qmailtoaster-plus should be available either later today or tomorrow
> >
> > Oh, okay ... makes me giggle!  :)
> >
> > +
> >
> >
> >
-
> >  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
> >
-
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] Problem sending mail

[Erik Espinoza]

Might want to check the logs and the firewall at the very minimum.

Did this problem start recently or has it always been an issue?

Did you install all of the dependencies?

Erik

On 1/8/07, Kaven Gagnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi,
I would like to provide more info but I don't really know where to
start.

About disk space, this is the first thing that I check, I got enough
space.  I also check the queue, there are only 4 messages.

Can you give me some suggestion to verify?

Thanks!


-Original Message-
From: Al Adcock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: January 8, 2007 5:55 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Problem sending mail

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Not really enough info for me to troubleshoot, but have you checked to
make sure you're not out of disk space?  This can masquerade as many
different problems and is where I would start.

Good luck!

Al

Kaven Gagnon wrote:
> Hi,
>   I got problem with sending e-mail.  If I try with Squirrelmail, the
> error reply is "ERROR: Server replied: 354".  (Outlook simply displays
the
> traditional time out error).  This problem happen suddenly... the
server
> was running perfectly since June 2006.  What's going on?
>
>   I'm running QmailToaster 1.03-1.3.5 on CentOS 4.3.
>
>
>   Thanks for you're help!
>
>   Regards,
>   Kaven G.
>
>
> -
>  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

- --
Al Adcock
Information Technologies Manager \~/ Webmaster
B&C Technologies
440 West 11th Street
Panama City, FL 32401
p:  850-249-
f:  850-249-2226
c:  850-625-5842
http://www.bandctech.com
ICQ:  179154
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFosu/in+bkGJNSOMRAl9nAJ49ujMx4cqz6x0d2aZa7E17DkHX/gCeJDPN
uaGI3f+qBAkPBei8Zf/XBvY=
=zw9k
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[qmailtoaster] Re: DEVEL PACKAGES: libsrs2-toaster, qmail-toaster & courier-imap-toaster

[Erik Espinoza]

For those who want to enable SRS support, please read here for info on
how to do it:
http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/info/srs-readme.txt

Thanks,
Erik

On 1/8/07, Erik Espinoza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Greetings,

I've just released 3 packages, two of which are optional upgrades. All
are available at http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/ for download now.

libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-1.3.1.src.rpm: SRS Library, needed only if you
wish to enable SRS Support in the qmail-toaster package.
qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.10.src.rpm: Same as 1.3.9, includes Alexey's
logging patches. Also includes SRS patch. Must type "--define 'srs 1'"
during compile time to enable it.
courier-imap-toaster-4.1.2-1.3.6.src.rpm: This package contains a
fixed pop3d-ssl config, which doesn't show errors for the SSL/TLS
Cache.

I have been testing out the SRS patch in conjunction with QmailToaster
for a couple of weeks and all looks well.

Thanks,
Erik



-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[qmailtoaster] DEVEL PACKAGES: libsrs2-toaster, qmail-toaster & courier-imap-toaster

[Erik Espinoza]

Greetings,

I've just released 3 packages, two of which are optional upgrades. All
are available at http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/ for download now.

libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-1.3.1.src.rpm: SRS Library, needed only if you
wish to enable SRS Support in the qmail-toaster package.
qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.10.src.rpm: Same as 1.3.9, includes Alexey's
logging patches. Also includes SRS patch. Must type "--define 'srs 1'"
during compile time to enable it.
courier-imap-toaster-4.1.2-1.3.6.src.rpm: This package contains a
fixed pop3d-ssl config, which doesn't show errors for the SSL/TLS
Cache.

I have been testing out the SRS patch in conjunction with QmailToaster
for a couple of weeks and all looks well.

Thanks,
Erik

-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] couriertls couriersslcache error

[Erik Espinoza]

Yeah I caught that. I had this in mantis a while back, before the db
was hosed. I will be fixing this soon and putting it on the devel
site.

Erik

On 1/8/07, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hey EE,
This appears to be a bug in the stock toaster.

courier-imap-toaster-4.1.1-1.3.2 has TLS_CACHEFILE=/var/run/couriersslcache
in /etc/courier/imap-ssl, imap-ssl.dist, pop3d-ssl, pop3d-ssl.dist files.

I upgraded to courier-imap-toaster-4.1.1-1.3.4, and now these files contain:
# grep TLS_CACHEFILE /etc/courier/*
/etc/courier/imapd-ssl:# that open multiple SSL sessions to the server.
TLS_CACHEFILE will be
/etc/courier/imapd-ssl:[EMAIL PROTECTED]@/couriersslcache
/etc/courier/imapd-ssl.dist:# that open multiple SSL sessions to the server.
 TLS_CACHEFILE will be
/etc/courier/imapd-ssl.dist:TLS_CACHEFILE=/var/couriersslcache
/etc/courier/pop3d-ssl:# POP3 clients. TLS_CACHEFILE will be automatically
created, TLS_CACHESIZE
/etc/courier/pop3d-ssl:[EMAIL PROTECTED]@/couriersslcache
/etc/courier/pop3d-ssl.dist:# POP3 clients. TLS_CACHEFILE will be
automatically created, TLS_CACHESIZE
/etc/courier/pop3d-ssl.dist:TLS_CACHEFILE=/var/couriersslcache

What is @[EMAIL PROTECTED] Is it some sort of variable, or does it need to be
replaced with /var/run like the previous version?

Quinn Comendant wrote:
> I'm getting this error in my pop3d-ssl and imap4-ssl logs:
>
>   2007-01-06 02:08:47.065522500 couriertls: 
@localstatedir@/couriersslcache: No such file or directory
>
> I found this post from last July:
>
>   
http://www.mail-archive.com/qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com/msg05625.html
>
> I discovered I could solve the issue by changing the TLS_CACHEFILE value in 
/etc/courier/{pop3d-ssl,imap4-ssl} from:
>
>   [EMAIL PROTECTED]@/couriersslcache
>
> to:
>
>   TLS_CACHEFILE=/var/cache/couriersslcache
>
> And the /var/cache/couriersslcache created itself.
>
> I wonder if localstatedir doesn't work because this value needs to be 
explicitly set on the configure option with --localstatedir=/var?
>
> Anybody else bothered by this error or found a different way to fix it?
>
> Extra bonus question: what is the relationship between imapd, imapd.cnf, and 
imapd.dist in the /etc/courier directory (and same for pop3d)?
>
> Quinn
>


--
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] DEVEL PACKAGE: squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.9a-1.3.5.src.rpm

[Erik Espinoza]

rpm -Uhv should do, so long as you didn't add any extra plugins and so forth.

Erik

On 1/8/07, CanopyAdmin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Erik Espinoza wrote:
> An updated squirrelmail package has been released on the devel site,
> http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/ and is available for immediate
> download.
Hi Erik,

If we do an upgrade like this, do we  rpm --upgrade sort of thing?
Or --delete the old and --install the new?

+




-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[qmailtoaster] DEVEL PACKAGE: squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.9a-1.3.5.src.rpm

[Erik Espinoza]

Greetings,

An updated squirrelmail package has been released on the devel site,
http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/ and is available for immediate
download.

This includes a lot of security fixes.

Thanks,
Erik

-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] limitting pop3 and smtp file size

[Erik Espinoza]

You can't send e-mail using pop3. The /var/qmail/control/databytes
should be global.

On 1/7/07, Isianto Istiadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Dear all,
 Is there any way to limit the email file size when sending to using pop3 in
qmail? As I recall for smtp I use DATABYTE.
 Thank you




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] Propoganda & Articles

[Erik Espinoza]

I dunno. I thought you were saying that you'd add a section about
Vickers Consulting in the next part of the article.

Just thought Force could be added to that. :)

Erik

On 1/5/07, Jake Vickers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Erik Espinoza wrote:
> Hey Jake,
>
> Would you mind adding ForceNetworks.com as a consulting company in the
> west coast that provides services for the QmailToaster in the support
> part?
I'd love to. Are we putting this on the main site or on the wiki? The
article I wrote is just a plug for the project, and directs people to
the main site and the mailing list.





-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] Propoganda & Articles

[Erik Espinoza]

Hey Jake,

Would you mind adding ForceNetworks.com as a consulting company in the
west coast that provides services for the QmailToaster in the support
part?

Thanks,
Erik

On 1/5/07, Jake Vickers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


 Eric "Shubes" wrote:
 Jake Vickers wrote:


 Erik Espinoza wrote:


 Greetings,

I want to write an article to put on HowtoForge about QmailToaster. We
have a fairly nice installed base, but I think we can get the numbers
up. I want 2007 to be a year of growth for the QmailToaster.

I would also like to write a propoganda type page, including
testimonials and company names that use the QmailToaster mail
software. I'd really appreciate it if users would send me testimonials
and company names if possible that can appear publicly on the main
qmailtoaster site.

 Sounds great. I'm all for it. Just before Christmas I was asked by
LinuxQuestions.org to submit an article about Toaster (which I finally
submitted last night). It's to be a multi-part article, with the first
one being how to install and a little about the project.
I can add my company (Vickers Consulting Group, LLC) as a user of
Toaster for about a dozen clients that I provide services for.
Let me know if I can be any more of a help.

 That sounds great, Jake. Be sure to let us know when it's published.

http://www.linuxquestions.org/linux/articles/Business_Use/QMail_Toaster_The_easy_way_to_setup_a_full_featured_mail_server_in_about_30_minutes_part_1





-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] Config file for automatic mail responses

[Erik Espinoza]

This isn't runtime configurable and is only accessible via the source.


On 1/5/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi everybody,

I'm looking for a file where i can set the message for system responses.
Ex. When user mailbox is full or the username not exist...

Where can I found it?


Thanks,

RL


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] SURBL usage

[Erik Espinoza]

http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/SURBL

On 1/4/07, Stanley Robins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi all Can i use SURBL with my qmailtoaster installation it is the one
before domainkeys, latest spamasassin toaster.

are there any issue with this usage ?

thank you



-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]