updating rpms using rpm
Hello, I am experiencing a problem trying to update my redhat 7.2 server using the built in ftp client in rpm. I am executing this command: rpm -Fvh ftp://ftp.server.com/pub/7.2/updates/en/os/i386/* However, I get nothing. No error messages or anything to give me an idea what is happening (or not happening) This works under 7.1, I have tried this on several 7.2 systems with the same result. Any insight would be appreciated ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: samba with Windows 2000
no, i had the line browsable = no in the [homes] section. I changed it to yes and tried again. Still no success. Windows 2000 was known to have problems with samba because of password encryption, domain name controllers etc. Can this be related to something like that ? Thanks, Jatan Michael S. Dunsavage wrote: >in the smb.conf file do u have a line in the shares like: > >browseable = yes > > >- Original Message - >From: "Jatan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "Redhat List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2002 8:34 PM >Subject: samba with Windows 2000 > > >>Hi all, >> >>I am trying to connect to Samba from a Windows 2000 client machine... it >>doesn't work :( >> >>I have three machines on my network, two of which are Win2000 machines >>and one is a Redhat Linux 7.2 box. Im running Samba 2.2.1 on it and its >>running fine as far as I can understand. I can also see the Linux box in >>the network neightborhood of both the win2000 machines, but thats about >>it. When I double click on the linux box icon, it says "Network path not >>found" (doesnt ask for password either). Basically I am not able to >>browse the linux files from win2000. >> >>I have created the smbpasswd file using the sampasswd command etc ... I >>dont think I have any 'domains' concept (or whatever, i dont know!) coz >>I havent myself setup any of the wn2000 machines as domain controllers. >>Ive tried using user as well as server for the 'security' entry in the >>smb.conf file. >> >>Im pretty new to this. Anyone has any idea whats going wrong ?? >> >>Thanks a lot! >> >>Jatan >> >>PS : I can browse my windows2000 machines shared folders from the linux >>box by using smbmount and providing the relevant password. >> >> >> >>___ >>Redhat-list mailing list >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list >> > > > >___ >Redhat-list mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Is RedHat droping the free subscriptors?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jim Bija wrote: >60 $ a year for updates PER COMPUTER. Does this sound more and more M$ like >or what? They provide free updates and you have to buy their new OS year >from year or so. >Now RHL is giving AND selling their OS and charging for updates. I also have >noticed the "were too busy for you non paying customers, wait till we get to >you" error while doing an up2date.Want to ruin a good idea? Add $$$... >Were seeing it now... No, we're seeing unenlightened gibberish. You can get everything you need at no charge from any of the sites listed here: http://www.redhat.com/download/mirror.html Are you completely new to Red Hat, or just a troll? - -d - -- David Talkington PGP key: http://www.prairienet.org/~dtalk/0xCA4C11AD.pgp - -- http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/pale_blue_dot.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5.8 Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6 iQA/AwUBPFOdF79BpdPKTBGtEQIv7wCgmWHV9Wd3Z75do90bKbuIAqPOCzgAnR1g nMGKiVzRALvCNH7NJqXWv9KQ =TYgA -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
IPMASQ probs
I have a RHL 7.2 box that is the gateway for a few machines. I wish to allow these machines behind the linux box to DCC and ICQ files back and forth. Everything works fine i think going out as the packets are originated from within, but as i remember people cant send me ICQ files or DCC files. Many many moons ago, someone wrote a module that was easily modprobed in the kernel, however this was was in the 2.2 kernel days and even in the 2.2 days redhat did something to not allow this module. So all of a sudden when i upgraded to (6.1 i THINK that module was "broke"). The workaround i was told to compile the kernel and turn on or off some switch i forgot. Anyway, i actually kind of gave up on the whole thing assuming after time redhat would "fix" their kernel so that module would work, BETTER YET make a module (which i HOPE exists, if so please tell me! ;) that will allow rhl 7.2 machines to allow DCC and ICQ from machines on the internel network, behind the RHL 7.2 gateway (ip masq/nat whatever). Jim. PS* Im just looking for the easiest way to do this, module,ipchains,iptables i dont care. If that module exists i would be a happy man! Ive looked, could find nothing. ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Is RedHat droping the free subscriptors?
60 $ a year for updates PER COMPUTER. Does this sound more and more M$ like or what? They provide free updates and you have to buy their new OS year from year or so. Now RHL is giving AND selling their OS and charging for updates. I also have noticed the "were too busy for you non paying customers, wait till we get to you" error while doing an up2date.Want to ruin a good idea? Add $$$... Were seeing it now... Just my 2 cents... Jim. - Original Message - From: "Dale Kosan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "redhat-list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2002 8:17 AM Subject: Re: Is RedHat droping the free subscriptors? > I agree, $60.00 a year is very reasonable for the service... > > > > > -- > > ICQ# 55846749 > > > Registered Linux user #191829 > > > A Cherokee Prayer: > > Oh Great Spirit, > > Help me always to speak the truth quietly, > > to listen with an open mind when others speak > > and to remember the peace that may be found in > > silence. > > > > ___ > Redhat-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: system entropy pool
On Sat, 2002-01-26 at 14:42, cameron wrote: > Can someone tell me what the system entopy pool is (and maybe how it works) or > direct me to some documentation on it? > check out man 4 random for the devices and some discusion about the entropy pool. Bret ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Weird Perl Compile Problem
Hi everyone, I'm having some trouble compiling Perl (5.6.x) with threads enabled. I am attempting this on RedHat 7.2. I am running configure by typing in "sh Configure -Dusethreads -Duse5005threads -des" and then I type "make"... the results of which are below my sig. Any ideas what might cause the error that results from this? Thanks, Tim -- Timothy R. Butler | Universal Networks | http://www.uninet.info [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 12495932 AIM: Uninettm Christian Portal and Search Tool: http://www.faithtree.com Open Source Migration Guide: http://www.ofb.biz = "Christian Web Services Since 1996" == `sh cflags libperl.a miniperlmain.o` miniperlmain.c CCCMD = gcc -DPERL_CORE -c -D_REENTRANT -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -O2 `sh cflags libperl.a perl.o` perl.c CCCMD = gcc -DPERL_CORE -c -D_REENTRANT -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -O2 `sh cflags libperl.a gv.o` gv.c CCCMD = gcc -DPERL_CORE -c -D_REENTRANT -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -O2 `sh cflags libperl.a toke.o` toke.c CCCMD = gcc -DPERL_CORE -c -D_REENTRANT -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -O2 `sh cflags libperl.a perly.o` perly.c CCCMD = gcc -DPERL_CORE -c -D_REENTRANT -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -O2 `sh cflags libperl.a op.o` op.c CCCMD = gcc -DPERL_CORE -c -D_REENTRANT -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -O2 `sh cflags libperl.a regcomp.o` regcomp.c CCCMD = gcc -DPERL_CORE -c -D_REENTRANT -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -O2 `sh cflags libperl.a dump.o` dump.c CCCMD = gcc -DPERL_CORE -c -D_REENTRANT -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -O2 `sh cflags libperl.a util.o` util.c CCCMD = gcc -DPERL_CORE -c -D_REENTRANT -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -O2 `sh cflags libperl.a mg.o` mg.c CCCMD = gcc -DPERL_CORE -c -D_REENTRANT -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -O2 `sh cflags libperl.a hv.o` hv.c CCCMD = gcc -DPERL_CORE -c -D_REENTRANT -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -O2 `sh cflags libperl.a av.o` av.c CCCMD = gcc -DPERL_CORE -c -D_REENTRANT -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -O2 `sh cflags libperl.a run.o` run.c CCCMD = gcc -DPERL_CORE -c -D_REENTRANT -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -O2 `sh cflags libperl.a pp_hot.o` pp_hot.c CCCMD = gcc -DPERL_CORE -c -D_REENTRANT -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -O2 `sh cflags libperl.a sv.o` sv.c CCCMD = gcc -DPERL_CORE -c -D_REENTRANT -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -O2 `sh cflags libperl.a pp.o` pp.c CCCMD = gcc -DPERL_CORE -c -D_REENTRANT -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -O2 `sh cflags libperl.a scope.o` scope.c CCCMD = gcc -DPERL_CORE -c -D_REENTRANT -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -O2 `sh cflags libperl.a pp_ctl.o` pp_ctl.c CCCMD = gcc -DPERL_CORE -c -D_REENTRANT -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -O2 `sh cflags libperl.a pp_sys.o` pp_sys.c CCCMD = gcc -DPERL_CORE -c -D_REENTRANT -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -O2 `sh cflags libperl.a doop.o` doop.c CCCMD = gcc -DPERL_CORE -c -D_REENTRANT -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -O2 `sh cflags libperl.a doio.o` doio.c CCCMD = gcc -DPERL_CORE -c -D_REENTRANT -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -O2 `sh cflags libperl.a regexec.o` regexec.c CCCMD = gcc -DPERL_CORE -c -D_REENTRANT -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -O2 `sh cflags libperl.a utf8.o` utf8.c CCCMD = gcc -DPERL_CORE -c -D_REENTRANT -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -O2 `sh cflags libperl.a taint.o` taint.c CCCMD = gcc -DPERL_CORE -c -D_REENTRANT -fno-
Re: samba with Windows 2000
in the smb.conf file do u have a line in the shares like: browseable = yes - Original Message - From: "Jatan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Redhat List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2002 8:34 PM Subject: samba with Windows 2000 > Hi all, > > I am trying to connect to Samba from a Windows 2000 client machine... it > doesn't work :( > > I have three machines on my network, two of which are Win2000 machines > and one is a Redhat Linux 7.2 box. Im running Samba 2.2.1 on it and its > running fine as far as I can understand. I can also see the Linux box in > the network neightborhood of both the win2000 machines, but thats about > it. When I double click on the linux box icon, it says "Network path not > found" (doesnt ask for password either). Basically I am not able to > browse the linux files from win2000. > > I have created the smbpasswd file using the sampasswd command etc ... I > dont think I have any 'domains' concept (or whatever, i dont know!) coz > I havent myself setup any of the wn2000 machines as domain controllers. > Ive tried using user as well as server for the 'security' entry in the > smb.conf file. > > Im pretty new to this. Anyone has any idea whats going wrong ?? > > Thanks a lot! > > Jatan > > PS : I can browse my windows2000 machines shared folders from the linux > box by using smbmount and providing the relevant password. > > > > ___ > Redhat-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Regular expressions
On 01:26 27 Jan 2002, Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | * and then Cameron Simpson blurted | > man perlre | > | > man egrep | > | > Both tell you quite a lot. | | Yes, thanks Cameron, Bear in mind that there is some variance in regexps. ed and sed and grep and vi have the core regexp syntax. Egrep and perl and python and recent vi clones (vim, nvi) and emacs have "full" or "extended" regexps. Perl and python and java 1.4+ have POSIX regexps (which handle Unicode etc and have extensions for character classes for locale support). | Anyway, I checked out the man grep page and although I could kinda get | it. it's very 'immediately technical' and more than a little daunting. | Stil, I'm up for it. The core notion is that most characters stand for themselves, so: stand is a regexp to match the string "stand". All the rest is frills. The core specials are: \ The next character _is_not_ special. Eg: \. for a literal dot. ^ start of line, eg: ^first $ end of line, eg: last$ . and single character (usualy except for newline), eg: a.c matches abc and a-c etc [a-z] a single character in the range [^a-z] a single character not in the range () grouping | alternation within a group, eg: the car is (red|blue|yellow) matching the car is red or the car is blue etc * 0 or more of the previous item, eg: .* 0 or more characters ba*dbd or bad or baad or ... + 1 or more of the previous item, eg: ^(re: *)+ to match "re:", possibly with following spaces, as many times as it occurs at the beginning of the line, handy for tidying up Subject: lines like Subject: re: re:re: topic There's more, but those are the basics. "Basic regexps" don't have + or () or |, except for sed and vi with have () but they need special marking as \( and \) (for historical backwards compatibility). Full regexps have the rest and _don't_ need sloshes (\\) on the ( and ) specials. -- Cameron Simpson, DoD#743[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.zip.com.au/~cs/ Through and through the world is infested with quantity. To talk sense is to talk quantities. It is no use saying the nation is large- how large? It is no use saying that radium is scarce- how scarce? You can not evade quantity. You may fly to poetry and music and quantity and number will face you in your rythmns and your octaves. - Alfred North Whitehead ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: home directory
On 10:09 27 Jan 2002, adrian kok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | I will create several home directories | | eg: home2, home3, home4 | | how do I set the home directory eg: home2 or home3 | when I create a new account? | | because the default is home directory If you're using adduser then RTFM: -d home_dir The new user will be created using home_dir as the value for the user's login directory. The default is to append the login name to default_home and use that as the login directory name. It's right there, plain as day. -- Cameron Simpson, DoD#743[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.zip.com.au/~cs/ But not in the World According to Microsoft where users are idiots and Wizards claim a monopoly on common sense. I want smart software, but if I can't have that, I want dumb software that knows it is dumb and comes to me for help, not dumb software that thinks it is smart and tells me lies it believes to be true. - [EMAIL PROTECTED] in RISKS 20.63 on route planning software saying you can't get there from here ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Converting HTML Pages to PDF Format
On Sat, 26 Jan 2002, Dave Ihnat wrote: > On Sat, Jan 26, 2002 at 08:44:19PM -0500, R P Herrold wrote: > > man 1 ps2ascii > > Uh...Dude, the question was PDF, not PS, to ASCII... Uh...Dude, RTFManpage ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Converting HTML Pages to PDF Format
On Sat, Jan 26, 2002 at 08:44:19PM -0500, R P Herrold wrote: > man 1 ps2ascii Uh...Dude, the question was PDF, not PS, to ASCII... -- Dave "Only 2 characters off, after all..." Ihnat [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
home directory
Hi all I will create several home directories eg: home2, home3, home4 how do I set the home directory eg: home2 or home3 when I create a new account? because the default is home directory Thank you ___ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com.hk address at http://mail.english.yahoo.com.hk ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Dual Boot WinXP/RedHat Linux 7.2 on Sony Vaio Notebook
The other factor could/would be if there is a reinstall partition, instead of a rescue CD. On Sat, 26 Jan 2002, David Talkington wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Mike Burger wrote: > > >The problem, as I see it, is that he doesn't necessarily want to nuke the > >drive...my understanding is that he wants to keep Windows on there, as > >well as Linux. > > > >Am I misreading? > > I think so. He wants to remove the "D: partition", which is either a > second primary or a logical within an extended. Either way, you can > blast that partition during install and then use it, without > disturbing hda1. Whether that's a problem depends on whether his > Windows installation is using D:, but his message suggests that it > isn't. > > - -d > > > >On Sat, 26 Jan 2002, David Talkington wrote: > > > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > >> Hash: SHA1 > >> > >> Mike Burger wrote: > >> > >> >XP doesn't use the old DOS fdisk, anymore, if I recall correctly. > >> > >> It doesn't, but maybe the OP is trying to use a DOS disk. Doesn't > >> matter, the answer is the same; nuke it during install. > >> > >> - -d > >> > >> > >> >On Sat, 26 Jan 2002, David Talkington wrote: > >> > > >> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > >> >> Hash: SHA1 > >> >> > >> >> RAMAN GUPTA wrote: > >> >> > >> >> >I recently bought a Sony Vaio Notebook (P-III) preinstalled Win Xp, > >> >> >with C: (Fat32) and D:(NTFS) partitions. I do not have a Win XP CD, > >> >> >but only a Sony Recovery CD and it does not let me delete the D: > >> >> >partition (with Fdisk). > >> >> > >> >> Who cares what MS-DOS fdisk thinks? Delete it during the Red Hat > >> >> installation process, using Linux fdisk or Disk Druid. > >> >> > >> >> - -d > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> - -- > >> >> David Talkington > >> >> > >> >> PGP key: http://www.prairienet.org/~dtalk/0xCA4C11AD.pgp > >> >> - -- > >> >> http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/pale_blue_dot.html > >> >> > >> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > >> >> Version: PGP 6.5.8 > >> >> Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6 > >> >> > >> >> iQA/AwUBPFMqcb9BpdPKTBGtEQJgKACgntuV+u5p+U1jUP7BMkpxMLRjEhQAn1E8 > >> >> c1TXSTQAAnTLN6j4fZZQeWdR > >> >> =ykbq > >> >> -END PGP SIGNATURE- > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> ___ > >> >> Redhat-list mailing list > >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> >> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >___ > >> >Redhat-list mailing list > >> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> >https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > >> > > >> > >> - -- > >> David Talkington > >> > >> PGP key: http://www.prairienet.org/~dtalk/0xCA4C11AD.pgp > >> - -- > >> http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/pale_blue_dot.html > >> > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > >> Version: PGP 6.5.8 > >> Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6 > >> > >> iQA/AwUBPFNF+L9BpdPKTBGtEQKTcgCeO9ZbVMOVVRM/LUs4rXYm+kL3+EIAn1jg > >> cNKoqFn8ZVnlPSats8ShKPt1 > >> =76/z > >> -END PGP SIGNATURE- > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> ___ > >> Redhat-list mailing list > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > >> > > > > > > > >___ > >Redhat-list mailing list > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > > - -- > David Talkington > > PGP key: http://www.prairienet.org/~dtalk/0xCA4C11AD.pgp > - -- > http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/pale_blue_dot.html > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: PGP 6.5.8 > Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6 > > iQA/AwUBPFNRSr9BpdPKTBGtEQKO8gCg10UhZhaVbUZjoCGaI0uGeLjcvecAn3nK > eCPEGgRpv5DZgJoivjlNJ9Df > =gcA4 > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > > > > > ___ > Redhat-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
lilo on default in anaconda
Hello, By default, anaconda proposed grub for boot loader and lilo, but grub is the default. i want to patch anaconda so that lilo is the default bootloader. I found what to change for this but only on the console anaconda mode. I can't find where is the option for the graphical installation (such as the cdrom installation). Can anyone help me ? I have another question: how can i change the pingouin proposed by lilo at the very begining of the boot (i want to change this "image" by another) ? Thanks for your help -- Jérôme ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Converting HTML Pages to PDF Format
On Sat, 26 Jan 2002, Dave Ihnat wrote: > Good question--I've always viewed PDF as a sink, not a source. Hmmm...I > don't recall ever having encountered something that will pull something > out of PDFland. > > I look forward to being proven wrong. This kind of thing is just what I > expect out of Uni--er, Linux development. man 1 ps2ascii -- Russ herrold ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
samba with Windows 2000
Hi all, I am trying to connect to Samba from a Windows 2000 client machine... it doesn't work :( I have three machines on my network, two of which are Win2000 machines and one is a Redhat Linux 7.2 box. Im running Samba 2.2.1 on it and its running fine as far as I can understand. I can also see the Linux box in the network neightborhood of both the win2000 machines, but thats about it. When I double click on the linux box icon, it says "Network path not found" (doesnt ask for password either). Basically I am not able to browse the linux files from win2000. I have created the smbpasswd file using the sampasswd command etc ... I dont think I have any 'domains' concept (or whatever, i dont know!) coz I havent myself setup any of the wn2000 machines as domain controllers. Ive tried using user as well as server for the 'security' entry in the smb.conf file. Im pretty new to this. Anyone has any idea whats going wrong ?? Thanks a lot! Jatan PS : I can browse my windows2000 machines shared folders from the linux box by using smbmount and providing the relevant password. ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Converting HTML Pages to PDF Format
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ed Wilts wrote: >OK, consider yourself wrong :-). We do this kind of thing regularly at >work. I'm not sure what tools we use (and I strongly suspect that they're >Windows-based), and we have worked with quite a few different products, but >I can say that the tools don't appear to be perfect yet. We actually get >quite a few customer documents sent to us in PDF format, and we need to >extract the information out, massage the data, and produce print and HTML >documents back. The problem with this, of course, is that PDF is fundamentally a presentation format, so whatever you get is likely to be suboptimally organized. Much better to start with XML or TeX source documents (or even valid HTML 4.1). I realize, naturally, that we don't always have that choice. - -d - -- David Talkington PGP key: http://www.prairienet.org/~dtalk/0xCA4C11AD.pgp - -- http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/pale_blue_dot.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5.8 Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6 iQA/AwUBPFNSfr9BpdPKTBGtEQLDjwCeLI5QfjLbCsYVjfdA9OmE9WB2UZMAnjro rlZXzGbloJIXFv5SLadG5/Mo =FcHO -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Dual Boot WinXP/RedHat Linux 7.2 on Sony Vaio Notebook
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mike Burger wrote: >The problem, as I see it, is that he doesn't necessarily want to nuke the >drive...my understanding is that he wants to keep Windows on there, as >well as Linux. > >Am I misreading? I think so. He wants to remove the "D: partition", which is either a second primary or a logical within an extended. Either way, you can blast that partition during install and then use it, without disturbing hda1. Whether that's a problem depends on whether his Windows installation is using D:, but his message suggests that it isn't. - -d >On Sat, 26 Jan 2002, David Talkington wrote: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Mike Burger wrote: >> >> >XP doesn't use the old DOS fdisk, anymore, if I recall correctly. >> >> It doesn't, but maybe the OP is trying to use a DOS disk. Doesn't >> matter, the answer is the same; nuke it during install. >> >> - -d >> >> >> >On Sat, 26 Jan 2002, David Talkington wrote: >> > >> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> >> >> RAMAN GUPTA wrote: >> >> >> >> >I recently bought a Sony Vaio Notebook (P-III) preinstalled Win Xp, >> >> >with C: (Fat32) and D:(NTFS) partitions. I do not have a Win XP CD, >> >> >but only a Sony Recovery CD and it does not let me delete the D: >> >> >partition (with Fdisk). >> >> >> >> Who cares what MS-DOS fdisk thinks? Delete it during the Red Hat >> >> installation process, using Linux fdisk or Disk Druid. >> >> >> >> - -d >> >> >> >> >> >> - -- >> >> David Talkington >> >> >> >> PGP key: http://www.prairienet.org/~dtalk/0xCA4C11AD.pgp >> >> - -- >> >> http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/pale_blue_dot.html >> >> >> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- >> >> Version: PGP 6.5.8 >> >> Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6 >> >> >> >> iQA/AwUBPFMqcb9BpdPKTBGtEQJgKACgntuV+u5p+U1jUP7BMkpxMLRjEhQAn1E8 >> >> c1TXSTQAAnTLN6j4fZZQeWdR >> >> =ykbq >> >> -END PGP SIGNATURE- >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ___ >> >> Redhat-list mailing list >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> >___ >> >Redhat-list mailing list >> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list >> > >> >> - -- >> David Talkington >> >> PGP key: http://www.prairienet.org/~dtalk/0xCA4C11AD.pgp >> - -- >> http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/pale_blue_dot.html >> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- >> Version: PGP 6.5.8 >> Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6 >> >> iQA/AwUBPFNF+L9BpdPKTBGtEQKTcgCeO9ZbVMOVVRM/LUs4rXYm+kL3+EIAn1jg >> cNKoqFn8ZVnlPSats8ShKPt1 >> =76/z >> -END PGP SIGNATURE- >> >> >> >> >> ___ >> Redhat-list mailing list >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list >> > > > >___ >Redhat-list mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > - -- David Talkington PGP key: http://www.prairienet.org/~dtalk/0xCA4C11AD.pgp - -- http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/pale_blue_dot.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5.8 Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6 iQA/AwUBPFNRSr9BpdPKTBGtEQKO8gCg10UhZhaVbUZjoCGaI0uGeLjcvecAn3nK eCPEGgRpv5DZgJoivjlNJ9Df =gcA4 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Converting HTML Pages to PDF Format
From: "Dave Ihnat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Sun, Jan 27, 2002 at 10:19:50AM +1100, Edwin Humphries wrote: > > Is there a reasonable way to go the reverse direction: > > from PDF to HTML - maybe via PS, or other intermediate > > format? > > Good question--I've always viewed PDF as a sink, not a source. Hmmm...I > don't recall ever having encountered something that will pull something > out of PDFland. > > I look forward to being proven wrong. This kind of thing is just what I > expect out of Uni--er, Linux development. OK, consider yourself wrong :-). We do this kind of thing regularly at work. I'm not sure what tools we use (and I strongly suspect that they're Windows-based), and we have worked with quite a few different products, but I can say that the tools don't appear to be perfect yet. We actually get quite a few customer documents sent to us in PDF format, and we need to extract the information out, massage the data, and produce print and HTML documents back. Ed Wilts Mounds View, MN, USA mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Dual Boot WinXP/RedHat Linux 7.2 on Sony Vaio Notebook
The problem, as I see it, is that he doesn't necessarily want to nuke the drive...my understanding is that he wants to keep Windows on there, as well as Linux. Am I misreading? On Sat, 26 Jan 2002, David Talkington wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Mike Burger wrote: > > >XP doesn't use the old DOS fdisk, anymore, if I recall correctly. > > It doesn't, but maybe the OP is trying to use a DOS disk. Doesn't > matter, the answer is the same; nuke it during install. > > - -d > > > >On Sat, 26 Jan 2002, David Talkington wrote: > > > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > >> Hash: SHA1 > >> > >> RAMAN GUPTA wrote: > >> > >> >I recently bought a Sony Vaio Notebook (P-III) preinstalled Win Xp, > >> >with C: (Fat32) and D:(NTFS) partitions. I do not have a Win XP CD, > >> >but only a Sony Recovery CD and it does not let me delete the D: > >> >partition (with Fdisk). > >> > >> Who cares what MS-DOS fdisk thinks? Delete it during the Red Hat > >> installation process, using Linux fdisk or Disk Druid. > >> > >> - -d > >> > >> > >> - -- > >> David Talkington > >> > >> PGP key: http://www.prairienet.org/~dtalk/0xCA4C11AD.pgp > >> - -- > >> http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/pale_blue_dot.html > >> > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > >> Version: PGP 6.5.8 > >> Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6 > >> > >> iQA/AwUBPFMqcb9BpdPKTBGtEQJgKACgntuV+u5p+U1jUP7BMkpxMLRjEhQAn1E8 > >> c1TXSTQAAnTLN6j4fZZQeWdR > >> =ykbq > >> -END PGP SIGNATURE- > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> ___ > >> Redhat-list mailing list > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > >> > > > > > > > >___ > >Redhat-list mailing list > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > > - -- > David Talkington > > PGP key: http://www.prairienet.org/~dtalk/0xCA4C11AD.pgp > - -- > http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/pale_blue_dot.html > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: PGP 6.5.8 > Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6 > > iQA/AwUBPFNF+L9BpdPKTBGtEQKTcgCeO9ZbVMOVVRM/LUs4rXYm+kL3+EIAn1jg > cNKoqFn8ZVnlPSats8ShKPt1 > =76/z > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > > > > > ___ > Redhat-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Converting HTML Pages to PDF Format
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David Talkington wrote: >Dave Ihnat wrote: > >>Good question--I've always viewed PDF as a sink, not a source. Hmmm...I >>don't recall ever having encountered something that will pull something >>out of PDFland. > >I'm not sure one would _want_ to do that if it could be avoided, but >do 'pdf ' and look at the possibilities ... ^^^ Er, no space there obviously. - -d - -- David Talkington PGP key: http://www.prairienet.org/~dtalk/0xCA4C11AD.pgp - -- http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/pale_blue_dot.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5.8 Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6 iQA/AwUBPFNPqr9BpdPKTBGtEQKuIgCfR5E8Sq0bN0omwpCbDA/l5LV339oAoOV1 YMnJhhQ+zSYwe+ZImlaSf90i =XxXQ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Converting HTML Pages to PDF Format
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dave Ihnat wrote: >Good question--I've always viewed PDF as a sink, not a source. Hmmm...I >don't recall ever having encountered something that will pull something >out of PDFland. I'm not sure one would _want_ to do that if it could be avoided, but do 'pdf ' and look at the possibilities ... - -d - -- David Talkington PGP key: http://www.prairienet.org/~dtalk/0xCA4C11AD.pgp - -- http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/pale_blue_dot.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5.8 Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6 iQA/AwUBPFNPGL9BpdPKTBGtEQJlIACghkuVMasEYHdMJWJLWZR4lAwxUI8An25a C4h82Reb+610g4ws/iOL/4iP =JRh7 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Converting HTML Pages to PDF Format
On Sun, Jan 27, 2002 at 10:19:50AM +1100, Edwin Humphries wrote: > Is there a reasonable way to go the reverse direction: > from PDF to HTML - maybe via PS, or other intermediate > format? Good question--I've always viewed PDF as a sink, not a source. Hmmm...I don't recall ever having encountered something that will pull something out of PDFland. I look forward to being proven wrong. This kind of thing is just what I expect out of Uni--er, Linux development. Cheers, -- Dave Ihnat [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Regular expressions
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * and then Cameron Simpson blurted > man perlre > > man egrep > > Both tell you quite a lot. Yes, thanks Cameron, sorry about the accidental posting on this thread to all who may be following it by the way :) I got an extremely offensive mail privately about this thread and thought to publish the mail as part of the thread (yes I know, not really appropriate but geez, you should see this thing! Anyway, once I'd accidentally posted er... nothing it seemed a bad idea) Anyway, I checked out the man grep page and although I could kinda get it. it's very 'immediately technical' and more than a little daunting. Stil, I'm up for it. Thanks all and if anyone is interested in the 'very inappropriate privat mail' I got as a result of this thread just mail me with a subject of "Bad post" and I'll mail you back the message. Thanks again guys :-) - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:www.explodingnet.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE8U0kyHpvrrTa6L5oRAn1XAJ9WXd7XU8+vdhIjwcS2Fy1iikSimwCfTNxY hlkV2+m3onR0DOXs63okzKE= =1kxO -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Filtering spam...
On 12:07 25 Jan 2002, Mike Burger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | Fetchmail still uses the local Sendmail/Postfix/Exim/Qmail/etc to start | the delivery process (those programs *usually* pass off to Procmail at | that point). You can tell fetchmail to pass the mail directory to procmail (or maildrop or whatever) with the mda directive. It's what I do. -- Cameron Simpson, DoD#743[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.zip.com.au/~cs/ Lister: You see, I try and respect Rimmer, sir. I'm not an insubordinate man by nature. I try and respect him and everything, but it's not easy because he's such a smeghead. Rimmer: Did you hear that, sir? Lister, do you have any conception of the penalty for describing a superior technician as a smeghead? Todhunter: Oh, Rimmer, you _are_ a smeghead. - Red Dwarf, _The End_ ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Converting HTML Pages to PDF Format
Manish, > Is there any software / utility to convert an HTML page (with or without images) >into PDF format ? Look for HTMLDoc. []s, Fernando Lozano ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Dual Boot WinXP/RedHat Linux 7.2 on Sony Vaio Notebook
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mike Burger wrote: >XP doesn't use the old DOS fdisk, anymore, if I recall correctly. It doesn't, but maybe the OP is trying to use a DOS disk. Doesn't matter, the answer is the same; nuke it during install. - -d >On Sat, 26 Jan 2002, David Talkington wrote: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> RAMAN GUPTA wrote: >> >> >I recently bought a Sony Vaio Notebook (P-III) preinstalled Win Xp, >> >with C: (Fat32) and D:(NTFS) partitions. I do not have a Win XP CD, >> >but only a Sony Recovery CD and it does not let me delete the D: >> >partition (with Fdisk). >> >> Who cares what MS-DOS fdisk thinks? Delete it during the Red Hat >> installation process, using Linux fdisk or Disk Druid. >> >> - -d >> >> >> - -- >> David Talkington >> >> PGP key: http://www.prairienet.org/~dtalk/0xCA4C11AD.pgp >> - -- >> http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/pale_blue_dot.html >> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- >> Version: PGP 6.5.8 >> Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6 >> >> iQA/AwUBPFMqcb9BpdPKTBGtEQJgKACgntuV+u5p+U1jUP7BMkpxMLRjEhQAn1E8 >> c1TXSTQAAnTLN6j4fZZQeWdR >> =ykbq >> -END PGP SIGNATURE- >> >> >> >> >> ___ >> Redhat-list mailing list >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list >> > > > >___ >Redhat-list mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > - -- David Talkington PGP key: http://www.prairienet.org/~dtalk/0xCA4C11AD.pgp - -- http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/pale_blue_dot.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5.8 Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6 iQA/AwUBPFNF+L9BpdPKTBGtEQKTcgCeO9ZbVMOVVRM/LUs4rXYm+kL3+EIAn1jg cNKoqFn8ZVnlPSats8ShKPt1 =76/z -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Regular expressions
On 10:43 26 Jan 2002, Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | Hmmm Thanks guys but I was hoping for something online and *free* :) man perlre man egrep Both tell you quite a lot. -- Cameron Simpson, DoD#743[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.zip.com.au/~cs/ [Alain] had been looking at his dashboard, and had not seen me, so I ran into him. - Jean Alesi on his qualifying prang at Imola '93 ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: [OT] Regular expressions
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * and then Nick Wilson blurted > > * and then Ben Logan blurted > > Try > > > > $ man 7 regex > > Okay, got it. There is a 7 in your command though? (man 7 regex)? > > > Chances are you'll get a manpage describing POSIX REs. It's a bit > > opaque to begin with, though. :) > > Certainly is! But it can't be that tough surely? > > > > > I can recommend the Python Regex HOWTO > > (http://py-howto.sourceforge.net/regex/regex.html). It does a very > > good job of introducing REs, IMHO, and the concepts apply to other > > implementations as well...after all, it describes Python's Perl style > > REs. > > Yeah, I saw that and avoided it as I thought it would be very Python > specific. I'll go have a look at it. > > > You might also find something useful here: > > http://dmoz.org/Computers/Programming/Languages/Regular_Expessions/ > > Yep, sounds good. Cheers! > > - -- > > Nick Wilson > > Tel: +45 3325 0688 > Fax: +45 3325 0677 > Web: www.explodingnet.com > > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQE8UzgDHpvrrTa6L5oRArp2AJsG7evccl3/T9+nxHJTnE2q5JHlBQCeI5dP > eb9pRT8gluLg/45zvVUl5ZI= > =lBL5 > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > > > > ___ > Redhat-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:www.explodingnet.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE8U0AtHpvrrTa6L5oRAh5NAJsH9nIAEeHuuRf8ekHdNwswiIDXuQCfbI0O oG6MxUY6iOp9ESH7BR3XnXQ= =lI0v -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Dual Boot WinXP/RedHat Linux 7.2 on Sony Vaio Notebook
XP doesn't use the old DOS fdisk, anymore, if I recall correctly. On Sat, 26 Jan 2002, David Talkington wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > RAMAN GUPTA wrote: > > >I recently bought a Sony Vaio Notebook (P-III) preinstalled Win Xp, > >with C: (Fat32) and D:(NTFS) partitions. I do not have a Win XP CD, > >but only a Sony Recovery CD and it does not let me delete the D: > >partition (with Fdisk). > > Who cares what MS-DOS fdisk thinks? Delete it during the Red Hat > installation process, using Linux fdisk or Disk Druid. > > - -d > > > - -- > David Talkington > > PGP key: http://www.prairienet.org/~dtalk/0xCA4C11AD.pgp > - -- > http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/pale_blue_dot.html > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: PGP 6.5.8 > Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6 > > iQA/AwUBPFMqcb9BpdPKTBGtEQJgKACgntuV+u5p+U1jUP7BMkpxMLRjEhQAn1E8 > c1TXSTQAAnTLN6j4fZZQeWdR > =ykbq > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > > > > > ___ > Redhat-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Converting HTML Pages to PDF Format
Question: Is there a reasonable way to go the reverse direction: from PDF to HTML - maybe via PS, or other intermediate format? On 26 Jan 2002 at 14:05, Dave Ihnat wrote: > On Sat, Jan 26, 2002 at 10:49:40PM +0500, Manish Kathuria wrote: > > Is there any software / utility to convert an HTML page (with or > > without images) into PDF format ? > > There is a procedure you can follow. Set up a PS printer, then filter to > ps2pdf. There's an excellent procedure documented for this in an article > at http://www.linuxgazette.com/issue72/bright.html. > > Cheers, > -- > Dave Ihnat > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > ___ > Redhat-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: [OT] Regular expressions
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * and then Ben Logan blurted > Try > > $ man 7 regex Okay, got it. There is a 7 in your command though? (man 7 regex)? > Chances are you'll get a manpage describing POSIX REs. It's a bit > opaque to begin with, though. :) Certainly is! But it can't be that tough surely? > > I can recommend the Python Regex HOWTO > (http://py-howto.sourceforge.net/regex/regex.html). It does a very > good job of introducing REs, IMHO, and the concepts apply to other > implementations as well...after all, it describes Python's Perl style > REs. Yeah, I saw that and avoided it as I thought it would be very Python specific. I'll go have a look at it. > You might also find something useful here: > http://dmoz.org/Computers/Programming/Languages/Regular_Expessions/ Yep, sounds good. Cheers! - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:www.explodingnet.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE8UzgDHpvrrTa6L5oRArp2AJsG7evccl3/T9+nxHJTnE2q5JHlBQCeI5dP eb9pRT8gluLg/45zvVUl5ZI= =lBL5 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Netscape menus gone -Need help recovering!
Check your fonts. DId you update some? I've updated two of my boxes with KDE 2.2.2 and Netscape 4.78 works just fine on both. Mike W BobH wrote: > > Hi, >I just upgraded to KDE-2.2.2 on a RH-2 box with netscape-4.78 installed. > I have lost all the menus and command bar fonts! I have done a force > refresh and still no good. > >The text on the web pages renders just fine. E-Mail, once I get there, > is okay. But if I try to save an attachment there is no readable text on > any of the buttons. > >It seems that the font may have changed. I cannot, however, read > preferences. Is there another way to make sure it is using the correct > font? If so what do I need to change it to to make the text reappear? > >Thanks for the help, I really neet it here. > > Bob > > ___ > Redhat-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Dual Boot WinXP/RedHat Linux 7.2 on Sony Vaio Notebook
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 RAMAN GUPTA wrote: >I recently bought a Sony Vaio Notebook (P-III) preinstalled Win Xp, >with C: (Fat32) and D:(NTFS) partitions. I do not have a Win XP CD, >but only a Sony Recovery CD and it does not let me delete the D: >partition (with Fdisk). Who cares what MS-DOS fdisk thinks? Delete it during the Red Hat installation process, using Linux fdisk or Disk Druid. - -d - -- David Talkington PGP key: http://www.prairienet.org/~dtalk/0xCA4C11AD.pgp - -- http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/pale_blue_dot.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5.8 Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6 iQA/AwUBPFMqcb9BpdPKTBGtEQJgKACgntuV+u5p+U1jUP7BMkpxMLRjEhQAn1E8 c1TXSTQAAnTLN6j4fZZQeWdR =ykbq -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: [7.2] can't find console screensaver
On Sat, Jan 26, 2002 at 01:48:23PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Does anyone know what program is doing this, where it is started, > and how to configure the timing settings? man setterm -- Hal Burgiss ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
[7.2] can't find console screensaver
In Rh7.2, there is a default console screensaver. I use this screensaver, but do not like its timing settings. I spent more than an hour last night trying to find what the program was and where it was started. I went through all the init stuff in /etc/rc.d (I use runlevel3), but couldn't find it. I was looking for 'xset' settings, though X isn't started in my case, or anything else that looked like it might do the job. Does anyone know what program is doing this, where it is started, and how to configure the timing settings? Thank you. -- - Martin J. Brown, Jr. - - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Public PGP Key ID: 0xB29EDDCADB184F7B keyserver: http://certserver.pgp.com/ ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Dual Boot WinXP/RedHat Linux 7.2 on Sony Vaio Notebook
Rather than delete teh D partition, why not just shrink it (you can use a bootable parted disk, or you might be able to shrink it from the Windows disk administration tool)? On Sat, 26 Jan 2002, RAMAN GUPTA wrote: > > > > I recently bought a Sony Vaio Notebook (P-III) preinstalled Win Xp, with C: (Fat32) >and D:(NTFS) partitions. I do not have a Win XP CD, but only a Sony Recovery CD and >it does not let me delete the D: partition (with Fdisk). > > How do I install Linux on this Laptop, I want to have Windows XP on the other >partition. > > Nipun > ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: system entropy pool
At 02:42 PM 1/26/02 -0600, cameron wrote: >Can someone tell me what the system entopy pool is (and maybe how it works) or >direct me to some documentation on it? If you've ever written a program in C (or C++, or a similar language) that used random numbers, then you're probably familiar with the need for a "seed" value for a pseudo-random number generator. If you seed a PRNG with the same value every time, it will produce the same sequence of numbers every time (not very random is it?). For a lot of applications it's considered a Good Thing(tm) to seed the PRNG with the current time when the program is started, but for cryptographic purposes this sucks. If you generate a key pair based on the output of a PRNG seeded with the current time then all a person has to do in order to guess your private key is grab a copy of the same encryption program (so he has the same pseudo-random number generator) and start guessing as to what time you ran the program. The attacker only needs to cover a period of a few weeks or months (at most) and typically only at 1-second resolution, so should be able to get the correct key within a matter of seconds on a good computer. Clearly this is not the sort of security you want for a "secure" web connection over SSL or the SSH shell you're using for remote root access. . . The purpose of the entropy pool is to store up measurements of unpredictable data (hardware interrupt timings, etc.) for use as seed values when generating random numbers for applications (like SSH and SSL) where it's important to have really random numbers. I'd suggest you drop by your local library and look at books relating to cryptography. The math can get a little intense, but if you don't balk at things like modular arithmetic and finite field theory and you should be fine. Most such books will also have a section on random number generators, and most good (often called "hybrid") random number generators rely on an entropy pool. If you can't find anything that suits you I can e-mail you a copy of a paper I wrote on random number generators last year (mind you it was a term paper, not a serious research paper). You can usually also find stuff related to random number generation in advanced statistics books (anything that deals with "Monte Carlo" techniques), but they tend to concentrate on tests of randomness and pseudo-random numbers, whereas an entropy pool is concerned with producing real random numbers. About the only really useful thing I got out of all this research was to learn that all cryptosystems written in Java (using Java's random number generator) are very, very easy to crack. -- "Of course, Linux has become userfriendly. See, you can now click buttons. But the thing is you don't feel like clicking them". - Naba kumar ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: system entropy pool
At 1/26/2002 02:42 PM -0600, you wrote: >Can someone tell me what the system entopy pool is (and maybe how it works) or >direct me to some documentation on it? In brief, entropy is randomness. The "system entropy pool" is a place where the system gathers data which it can safely consider random (i.e. mouse movements, keypresses, etc. which are not predictable); this data is then later used for key generation, random number generation, and other tasks where being unpredictable is extremely important. Sorry, that's all I know and wouldn't know to where I should point you either. But hopefully this at least takes the sharp edge off your curiosity. -- Rodolfo J. Paiz [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Dual Boot WinXP/RedHat Linux 7.2 on Sony Vaio Notebook
I recently bought a Sony Vaio Notebook (P-III) preinstalled Win Xp, with C: (Fat32) and D:(NTFS) partitions. I do not have a Win XP CD, but only a Sony Recovery CD and it does not let me delete the D: partition (with Fdisk). How do I install Linux on this Laptop, I want to have Windows XP on the other partition. Nipun
Re: Focus behavior
On Sat, Jan 26, 2002 at 11:53:31AM -0800, Duane Clark wrote: > Having recently upgraded from 6.2 to 7.2 (yea, I took my time doing > that), there is one change that is really irritating me. In > enlightenment, I had things set up so the focus follows the mouse, but > does not raise the windows. Windows were only raised when I clicked on > the border. > > Now with sawfish, it has similar settings for focus following the mouse, > and a setting that claims to be for "Raise windows when they are > focused". Well, okay, I guess technically this is correct since the > window is not raised immediately when it is focused. But as soon as I > click in it, it does get raised. That kind of defeats the purpose, it > seems to me. > > Is anyone aware of a way to defeat this "feature"? Or is the answer to > install and use enlightenment? I had the same problem when moving from 6.1 > 7.2, and I was using gnome and sawfish in 6.1. Fortunately, I had backed up my old stuff to cdrom, and was able to copy it over. Voila, good configuration. RH7.2 comes with version 0.38 of sawfish, but currently the version is later than 1.0. AFAIK, there is no official RH version later than 0.38. Here is the line that I believe does the trick: (custom-set-typed-variable (quote cycle-disable-auto-raise) (quote t) (quote boolean)) Put it in your ~/.sawfish/custom file after backing it up. Delete any lines that appear to conflict with it. If it doesn't work, I can send you the whole custom file for you to work from. RH7.2 sawfish has an acknowledged RH bug: the sawfish control center is not available until after accessing one of the sawfishcc subsections. Rh is one of the chief supporters of gnome/sawfish, and is the default desktop/wm for 7.2, and I am surprised that they have not come out with an official update for this package. Good luck. -- - Martin J. Brown, Jr. - - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Public PGP Key ID: 0xB29EDDCADB184F7B keyserver: http://certserver.pgp.com/ ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
system entropy pool
Can someone tell me what the system entopy pool is (and maybe how it works) or direct me to some documentation on it? Cameron ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
printcap question
Hi all, I have finally solved my printer problems with some hand editing of printcap. The file says make the changes in printcap.local so you don't lose them on reboot. Do you put a copy of the printers entries that you change to printcap.local or how does it work. I need to add mc=10:\ and change the locataion for the filter the mc entry is how you get rid of the annoying Fatal error - maximum of 1 copies allowed message if you want to use lpr -#copies to specify how many copies to print. Thanks Linda Hanigan ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Questions on fstab
I will try that Mike. The second "user" or the first or both? Hmm, about the virus, that is probably true. But in all honesty i use linux more than windows anyway, as long as it didn't get to my mbr i would be ok, which it probably couldn't do cuz it would have to execute windows api's right? Anyhow I will change both to users. In trolling around "man vfat" and "man mount" i didn't see any option for users. I got the current settings from a webpage on linuxvooodoo.com: "if you want to make sure that all users can use the drive freely, then this column should read: user, auto, dev, exec, user, rw. http://www.linuxvoodoo.com/newbies/mounting/mounting2.php"; Very good explanation other than that it doesn't work... I know my e-mail was unclear. In trying to make sure i got my point across i tried to be more wordy than usual, in doing so i kinda of got... lost. Thanks Mike, I'll wait to change it to users just because I didn't see it in the man files. If no one else chimes in, I guess I'll just try it and see how it works? Is no one else writing files to their windows drive as a user? -Brandon On Sat, 2002-01-26 at 04:37, Michael Scottaline wrote: > On 25 Jan 2002 17:52:00 -0800 > Brandon Dorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribbled in frustration: > > > Hello, > > > > Below is a copy of my /etc/fstab. I can't seem to be able to tweak it > > so that upon booting, my normal user account can write to say, the > > windows drive (mounted as /dev/hde1, /c of course) I'd like the same > > user writing priviledges while staying automounted for the other drives > > that at the current have the same settings as the c drive right now. > > I'm running RH 7.2 with kernel 2.4.17 and the latest ximian gnome and > > rh7.2 updates. > === > Just a guess here: > Try changing "user" to "users" > > While "user" allows anyone to mount or umount a drive, ONLY the one who > mounts owns the device and can umount it. Since /dev/hde1 is being > mounted on boot, it is owned by root. "users" allows anyone to umount a > device whether they were the ones to mount it or not, I believe. Perhaps > that would allow any user to write to the drive also? > > Worth a try??? > > Mike > > PS: There are some security concerns with this method I would think. > Perhaps winblows virii ignored by Linux would be able to make their way to > your Win partition, now with write privileges ;-( > > -- > "Many loads of beer were brought. What disorder, whoring, > fighting, killing, and dreadful idolatry took place there." > Baltasar Rusow, Estonia, mid 16th Century > > > > ___ > Redhat-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Converting HTML Pages to PDF Format
I believe that a2ps also will convert html directly to PDF. John On 01/26/02, 02:05:16PM -0600, Dave Ihnat wrote: > On Sat, Jan 26, 2002 at 10:49:40PM +0500, Manish Kathuria wrote: > > Is there any software / utility to convert an HTML page (with or > > without images) into PDF format ? > > There is a procedure you can follow. Set up a PS printer, then filter to > ps2pdf. There's an excellent procedure documented for this in an article > at http://www.linuxgazette.com/issue72/bright.html. > > Cheers, > -- > Dave Ihnat > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > ___ > Redhat-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- John P. Verel Living Proof That Low Tech Beats High Tech! ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Converting HTML Pages to PDF Format
On Sat, Jan 26, 2002 at 10:49:40PM +0500, Manish Kathuria wrote: > Is there any software / utility to convert an HTML page (with or > without images) into PDF format ? There is a procedure you can follow. Set up a PS printer, then filter to ps2pdf. There's an excellent procedure documented for this in an article at http://www.linuxgazette.com/issue72/bright.html. Cheers, -- Dave Ihnat [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Focus behavior
Having recently upgraded from 6.2 to 7.2 (yea, I took my time doing that), there is one change that is really irritating me. In enlightenment, I had things set up so the focus follows the mouse, but does not raise the windows. Windows were only raised when I clicked on the border. Now with sawfish, it has similar settings for focus following the mouse, and a setting that claims to be for "Raise windows when they are focused". Well, okay, I guess technically this is correct since the window is not raised immediately when it is focused. But as soon as I click in it, it does get raised. That kind of defeats the purpose, it seems to me. Is anyone aware of a way to defeat this "feature"? Or is the answer to install and use enlightenment? ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Using linux under windows...? or is it just linux under windows?
If you go to the VMWare site, you'll find that they have updated their modules are have them available, for use with RH7.2. On Sat, 26 Jan 2002, tracker wrote: > I had just tried to run RDHT7.2 and install VMware3.0 but ti kept saying > that the moduels was not able to be used by VMWARE.. so I formatted and > reinstalled windozedhoping to run linux under windoz... but later found out > that that is not possiable... either... so I will have to install anything > higher version of windows or reinstall rdhat- > - Original Message - > From: "Mike Burger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2002 9:34 AM > Subject: Re: Using linux under windows...? or is it just linux under > windows? > > > > VMWare for Windows only runs under an NT type environment...NT, 2000 or > > XP. Win4Lin is an environment to run Windows under Linux, much like the > > Linux version of VMWare. > > > > You're probably better off with the Linux->VMWare->Windows option. > > > > On Sat, 26 Jan 2002, tracker wrote: > > > > > Ok.. I have searched and searched high and low.. and unable to find or > > > locate in anyway a version of VMware that will run under win98se... so > i am > > > able to run linux under windoze.. .. is there a version of win4lin that > > > works for windows .. or is it just the complete oposit and I have to run > > > linux before windows ? > > > THX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >It is our duty still to endeavor to avoid > > > war: but if it shall actually take place, > > >no matter by whom brought on, we must > > > defend our selves. If our house be on fire > > >. . . we must try to extinguish it." > > >- Thomas Jefferson- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ___ > > > Redhat-list mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > > > > > > > > > ___ > > Redhat-list mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > > ___ > Redhat-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Using linux under windows...? or is it just linux under windows?
My understanding is that it's not yet an available or a viable product. On Sun, 27 Jan 2002, Mac ADd wrote: > No idea how well it works -- pls let me know if you try it: www.lindows.com > > At 12:10 2002.01.26 -0800, tracker wrote: > >Ok.. I have searched and searched high and low.. and unable to find or > >locate in anyway a version of VMware that will run under win98se... so i am > >able to run linux under windoze.. .. is there a version of win4lin that > >works for windows .. or is it just the complete oposit and I have to run > >linux before windows ? > >THX > > > > > > > > > > > > It is our duty still to endeavor to avoid > >war: but if it shall actually take place, > > no matter by whom brought on, we must > > defend our selves. If our house be on fire > > . . . we must try to extinguish it." > > - Thomas Jefferson- > > > > > > > > > >___ > >Redhat-list mailing list > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > > ___ > Redhat-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Using linux under windows...? or is it just linux under windows?
I had just tried to run RDHT7.2 and install VMware3.0 but ti kept saying that the moduels was not able to be used by VMWARE.. so I formatted and reinstalled windozedhoping to run linux under windoz... but later found out that that is not possiable... either... so I will have to install anything higher version of windows or reinstall rdhat- - Original Message - From: "Mike Burger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2002 9:34 AM Subject: Re: Using linux under windows...? or is it just linux under windows? > VMWare for Windows only runs under an NT type environment...NT, 2000 or > XP. Win4Lin is an environment to run Windows under Linux, much like the > Linux version of VMWare. > > You're probably better off with the Linux->VMWare->Windows option. > > On Sat, 26 Jan 2002, tracker wrote: > > > Ok.. I have searched and searched high and low.. and unable to find or > > locate in anyway a version of VMware that will run under win98se... so i am > > able to run linux under windoze.. .. is there a version of win4lin that > > works for windows .. or is it just the complete oposit and I have to run > > linux before windows ? > > THX > > > > > > > > > > > >It is our duty still to endeavor to avoid > > war: but if it shall actually take place, > >no matter by whom brought on, we must > > defend our selves. If our house be on fire > >. . . we must try to extinguish it." > >- Thomas Jefferson- > > > > > > > > > > ___ > > Redhat-list mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > > > > ___ > Redhat-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Using linux under windows...? or is it just linux under windows?
I have Mnadrake 7.1 and the new one 8.1 but ahh unsure.. comparing the versions to rdht7.2? - Original Message - From: "Michael S. Dunsavage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2002 9:21 AM Subject: Re: Using linux under windows...? or is it just linux under windows? > What about Mandrake's Linuxe for Windows? > > - Original Message - > From: "tracker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2002 3:10 PM > Subject: Using linux under windows...? or is it just linux under windows? > > > > Ok.. I have searched and searched high and low.. and unable to find or > > locate in anyway a version of VMware that will run under win98se... so i > am > > able to run linux under windoze.. .. is there a version of win4lin that > > works for windows .. or is it just the complete oposit and I have to run > > linux before windows ? > > THX > > > > > > > > > > > >It is our duty still to endeavor to avoid > > war: but if it shall actually take place, > >no matter by whom brought on, we must > > defend our selves. If our house be on fire > >. . . we must try to extinguish it." > >- Thomas Jefferson- > > > > > > > > > > ___ > > Redhat-list mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > > > > ___ > Redhat-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Using linux under windows...? or is it just linux under windows?
No idea how well it works -- pls let me know if you try it: www.lindows.com At 12:10 2002.01.26 -0800, tracker wrote: >Ok.. I have searched and searched high and low.. and unable to find or >locate in anyway a version of VMware that will run under win98se... so i am >able to run linux under windoze.. .. is there a version of win4lin that >works for windows .. or is it just the complete oposit and I have to run >linux before windows ? >THX > > > > > > It is our duty still to endeavor to avoid >war: but if it shall actually take place, > no matter by whom brought on, we must > defend our selves. If our house be on fire > . . . we must try to extinguish it." > - Thomas Jefferson- > > > > >___ >Redhat-list mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Using linux under windows...? or is it just linux under windows?
VMWare for Windows only runs under an NT type environment...NT, 2000 or XP. Win4Lin is an environment to run Windows under Linux, much like the Linux version of VMWare. You're probably better off with the Linux->VMWare->Windows option. On Sat, 26 Jan 2002, tracker wrote: > Ok.. I have searched and searched high and low.. and unable to find or > locate in anyway a version of VMware that will run under win98se... so i am > able to run linux under windoze.. .. is there a version of win4lin that > works for windows .. or is it just the complete oposit and I have to run > linux before windows ? > THX > > > > > >It is our duty still to endeavor to avoid > war: but if it shall actually take place, >no matter by whom brought on, we must > defend our selves. If our house be on fire >. . . we must try to extinguish it." >- Thomas Jefferson- > > > > > ___ > Redhat-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Is RedHat droping the free subscriptors?
Check out some of the up2date clones, like rhupdate (http://www.jjminer.org/rhupdate/). I haven't worked with rhupdate myself, but it does look interesting. .../Ed Ed Wilts Mounds View, MN, USA mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "Andreas Hansson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2002 10:45 AM Subject: Re: Is RedHat droping the free subscriptors? > Wouldn't it be possible to have this download from one of the mirrors > instead of directly from redhat? There's a mirror close to me that is > "never" too busy and that always gives a good speed download. I just haven't > seen any setting in up2date to download from mirrors instead of directly > from redhat. ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Using linux under windows...? or is it just linux under windows?
What about Mandrake's Linuxe for Windows? - Original Message - From: "tracker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2002 3:10 PM Subject: Using linux under windows...? or is it just linux under windows? > Ok.. I have searched and searched high and low.. and unable to find or > locate in anyway a version of VMware that will run under win98se... so i am > able to run linux under windoze.. .. is there a version of win4lin that > works for windows .. or is it just the complete oposit and I have to run > linux before windows ? > THX > > > > > >It is our duty still to endeavor to avoid > war: but if it shall actually take place, >no matter by whom brought on, we must > defend our selves. If our house be on fire >. . . we must try to extinguish it." >- Thomas Jefferson- > > > > > ___ > Redhat-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Converting HTML Pages to PDF Format
Is there any software / utility to convert an HTML page (with or without images) into PDF format ? Thanks, Manish ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Using linux under windows...? or is it just linux under windows?
Ok.. I have searched and searched high and low.. and unable to find or locate in anyway a version of VMware that will run under win98se... so i am able to run linux under windoze.. .. is there a version of win4lin that works for windows .. or is it just the complete oposit and I have to run linux before windows ? THX It is our duty still to endeavor to avoid war: but if it shall actually take place, no matter by whom brought on, we must defend our selves. If our house be on fire . . . we must try to extinguish it." - Thomas Jefferson- ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Is RedHat droping the free subscriptors?
Hello, > My understanding is that free service is still available, but only if the > server isn't busy. Seems reasonable, paying customers get priority > service. Keep in mind that a large number of packages have just had > updates released, and the server is likely fairly busy. I fully agree with you. It just happened that I have both messages at the same time (New offer! + Server busy) and I get a bit suspicious. > On the plus side, a basic subscription has dropped from $240.00 to $60.00 > per year. Again, I don't think up2date (free version) has stopped > working, just that we'll have to wait if we don't want to pay. > > I didn't subscribe previously as I thought $20.00/month was a little > expensive, given that I buy a new version every 6 months. With the new > pricing structure, and the fact that I don't want to wait, I'll be buying > a subscription. I think also that $60.- per year is ok. BTW, up2date is again working. I think you were right. I will consider as well a basic suscription. Best regards and thanks to you all, Tomás +-- --+ Tomás García Ferrari Bigital http://bigital.com/ +-- --+ ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Netscape menus gone -Need help recovering!
On Fri, 2002-01-25 at 21:17, BobH wrote: > Hi, >I just upgraded to KDE-2.2.2 on a RH-2 box with netscape-4.78 installed. > I have lost all the menus and command bar fonts! I have done a force > refresh and still no good. > >The text on the web pages renders just fine. E-Mail, once I get there, > is okay. But if I try to save an attachment there is no readable text on > any of the buttons. > >It seems that the font may have changed. I cannot, however, read > preferences. Is there another way to make sure it is using the correct > font? If so what do I need to change it to to make the text reappear? > >Thanks for the help, I really neet it here. > > Bob Does it work fo a different user? Bret ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Is RedHat droping the free subscriptors?
Wouldn't it be possible to have this download from one of the mirrors instead of directly from redhat? There's a mirror close to me that is "never" too busy and that always gives a good speed download. I just haven't seen any setting in up2date to download from mirrors instead of directly from redhat. Andreas - Original Message - From: "Devon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2002 2:12 PM Subject: Re: Is RedHat droping the free subscriptors? > > My understanding is that free service is still available, but only if the > server isn't busy. Seems reasonable, paying customers get priority > service. Keep in mind that a large number of packages have just had > updates released, and the server is likely fairly busy. ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Odp: hack attempts - opinions?
it is some m$ shit stuff: nimda/codered attempts -- "Prawde jak kundla trzeba batem wypedzac do budy" F. Zappa Pozdrawiam Daniel Chojecki ^EOF Brenden Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wysłane przez:DW: redhat-list-admin@Temat: hack attempts - opinions? redhat.com 02-01-25 21:52 Odpowiedz do redhat-list I've noticed quite a few computers trying to access files/directories on my FTP server that don't exist with the obvious intent to break in (cgi-bin, /winnt/system32 and the like). I'm not worried about these lame attempts, just wondering if I should send off an e-mail to the domain admins (root@ or abuse@). I suspect this is somebody running some form of scanning script. Any opinions? (I know, you guys don't usually share opinions ;-).. ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: [RHSA-2002:015-13] Updated at package available
On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, it was written: > - >Red Hat, Inc. Red Hat Security Advisory > > Synopsis: Updated at package available > Advisory ID: RHSA-2002:015-13 > Issue date:2002-01-15 > Updated on:2002-01-22 > Product: Red Hat Linux > Keywords: at security heap corruption environment > Cross references: > Obsoletes: > - My RH 6.2 Installation script functions path is: /etc/rc.d/init.d/functions and NOT /etc/init.d/functions Lawrence Houston - ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Sendmail: open relay from inside?
At 1/26/2002 10:50 AM -0500, you wrote: >Just tell it what ports you want to listen on and it will not listen on any >others. It's the same as what RH does to prevent any listening on outside >ports by default. You can list as many as you need. > >DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtp,Addr=127.0.0.1, Name=MTA') >DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtp,Addr=192.168.0.1, Name=MTA') Perfect; I thought you could only have one and didn't figure out how to delimit the two IP addresses. Now it makes sense. > > 2. Set iptables rules to redirect *all* mail connections from the inside to > > the firewall's sendmail, then have sendmail make final delivery. A > > transparent mail proxy, if you will. > >I'm not sure I understand this part. Maybe ascii art is in order. Or at least >an example of the flow of the mail. Sorry; the description really wasn't that good. I'm only talking about *sending* mail from inside that network, not receiving. I'd like iptables to take all outbound traffic to port 25 and redirect it to its own port 25; then sendmail will actually deliver out to the Internet. Think of a transparent web proxy; I just want to do the same thing to outgoing mail. Later on I'll integrate virus scanning and other features into this mix, which is why sendmail should relay *all* outbound mail from this network and not allow direct SMTP to the outside. -- Rodolfo J. Paiz [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Sendmail: open relay from inside?
Rodolfo, On Saturday 26 January 2002 10:21, you said something about: > Hi! > > I have a firewall/gateway box (7.2 with updates) which has been working > properly for a while, albeit with a very simple configuation (masquerade > anything out, let only ssh in). Now, I'd like to put sendmail on it but > with two twists: > > 1. Tell sendmail only to accept connections from the internal IP's > (127.0.0.1 and 192.168.0.1). The firewall blocks connections from the > outside, but defense in depth is good. Just tell it what ports you want to listen on and it will not listen on any others. It's the same as what RH does to prevent any listening on outside ports by default. You can list as many as you need. DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtp,Addr=127.0.0.1, Name=MTA') DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtp,Addr=192.168.0.1, Name=MTA') > > 2. Set iptables rules to redirect *all* mail connections from the inside to > the firewall's sendmail, then have sendmail make final delivery. A > transparent mail proxy, if you will. > > Can anyone comment on how I would do both of these? I'm getting very > confused by iptables, and also not finding the right sendmail directive for > mc. I'm not sure I understand this part. Maybe ascii art is in order. Or at least an example of the flow of the mail. Are you sure you don't just need to change the MX record (of course that's useless if not using DNS internally. Or perhaps it is just a matter of relaying/smart pelaying that needs to be done. I just can't get a grasp of the use of IPTables for mail traffic. -- Brian Ashe CTO Dee-Web Software Services, LLC. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Sendmail: open relay from inside?
Hi! I have a firewall/gateway box (7.2 with updates) which has been working properly for a while, albeit with a very simple configuation (masquerade anything out, let only ssh in). Now, I'd like to put sendmail on it but with two twists: 1. Tell sendmail only to accept connections from the internal IP's (127.0.0.1 and 192.168.0.1). The firewall blocks connections from the outside, but defense in depth is good. 2. Set iptables rules to redirect *all* mail connections from the inside to the firewall's sendmail, then have sendmail make final delivery. A transparent mail proxy, if you will. Can anyone comment on how I would do both of these? I'm getting very confused by iptables, and also not finding the right sendmail directive for mc. Thanks, y'all... -- Rodolfo J. Paiz [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Filtering spam...
> Henrik Schmiediche wrote: > > >Hello, > > I would like to know users experience filtering spam. I am aware that I can > > use procmail to do this at the user level and I think on the server level as > > well (have not checked into this yet). A few questions... I'm a technical user (been using linux for years), and a syadmin - I happen to run my own mail server. Postfix + rbl domains + some regex maps == spam free. The spam I do get comes through the accounts I don't have control of the servers for (and I'm fixing one of those in the next month) - but its minimal. ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Filtering spam...
I have the most success with creating a separate inbox. I set up a mail rule that checks to see if my address is in the "To:" or "CC:" and put all the mail there. I am on a few distributions and also include these. What is not processed is usually spam. I usually check my regular inbox pretty quickly and delete most of the messages, and my new inbox contains mostly stuff for me. Granted this works well, it is not perfect, but from the client side, it is the best option I have seen. Frank Henrik Schmiediche wrote: >Hello, > I would like to know users experience filtering spam. I am aware that I can > use procmail to do this at the user level and I think on the server level as > well (have not checked into this yet). A few questions... > >1) What are peoples experience on trying to filter spam on the server > level? Has it caused headaches... from a usability/user feedback & techincal > point of view? > >2) What tools to you recommend. If procmail, what scripts to you use? > > Sincerely, > > - henrik > > ___ > Redhat-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Is RedHat droping the free subscriptors?
I agree, $60.00 a year is very reasonable for the service... -- ICQ# 55846749 Registered Linux user #191829 A Cherokee Prayer: Oh Great Spirit, Help me always to speak the truth quietly, to listen with an open mind when others speak and to remember the peace that may be found in silence. ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Is RedHat droping the free subscriptors?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 26 January 2002 07:34 am, Tomas Garcia Ferrari wrote: > Hello, > > A long time ago, when using the RHN was absolutely free I subscribe > myself to it with several systems to check it out. At some point the > testing period was over but RH offered the possibility of keeping 1 > system registered for free. So I did. Now it seems to be that this > service is over. Even if my system is listed like having a "basic" > service when I run "up2date -l" I My understanding is that free service is still available, but only if the server isn't busy. Seems reasonable, paying customers get priority service. Keep in mind that a large number of packages have just had updates released, and the server is likely fairly busy. > I don't want to understand this as an action to force users to upgrade > their services, but if this is the case, I would had prefer to received > a note in advance. And yes, I received an e-mail from RHN offering new > upgrades. The same day that up2date stop working... :( On the plus side, a basic subscription has dropped from $240.00 to $60.00 per year. Again, I don't think up2date (free version) has stopped working, just that we'll have to wait if we don't want to pay. I didn't subscribe previously as I thought $20.00/month was a little expensive, given that I buy a new version every 6 months. With the new pricing structure, and the fact that I don't want to wait, I'll be buying a subscription. - -D - -- pgp key: http://www.tuxfan.homeip.net:8080/pgpkey.txt - -- -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8UqsleMAUbzJhSVcRAiisAJ4vfMabDOXVLr+6re58VIDMbrxRRACgoExA nHxCETW8igAX2zBx8idReqc= =hAYT -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re:
At 1/26/2002 12:00 AM -0800, you wrote: >Sorry to say, that since Ashley M. Kircher the Director ( Yea right! someone >needs to teach you some manners! ) Tracker, Kindly send flames directly to the person, not to the mailing list. No one else is interested, and several thousand people should not have to invest the time to read this since it *also* adds no value to the discussion. -- Rodolfo J. Paiz [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Is RedHat droping the free subscriptors?
I am still getting it off and on. I am okay with the fact that if they are busy they will cater to their paying customers, it is just funny that I am seeing it more and more. -- ICQ# 55846749 Registered Linux user #191829 A Cherokee Prayer: Oh Great Spirit, Help me always to speak the truth quietly, to listen with an open mind when others speak and to remember the peace that may be found in silence. ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Is RedHat droping the free subscriptors?
I was getting that message, yesterday, too...it eventually went away. On Sat, 26 Jan 2002, Tomas Garcia Ferrari wrote: > Hello, > > A long time ago, when using the RHN was absolutely free I subscribe myself > to it with several systems to check it out. At some point the testing period > was over but RH offered the possibility of keeping 1 system registered for > free. So I did. Now it seems to be that this service is over. Even if my > system is listed like having a "basic" service when I run "up2date -l" I > have a note saying this: > > Error Message: > > Free service limited due to high load, please try again later (server > > 142421) > > Error Class Code: 51 > > Error Class Info: > > Due to extremely high traffic, access to Red Hat Network is currently > > limited to subscription customers. Please try again later. If you > > would like to become a subscription customer, go to > > https://rhn.redhat.com/preview/priority_service.pxt for more information. > > Explanation: > > An error has occurred while processing your request. If this problem > > persists please submit a bug report to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > If you choose to submit the bug report, please be sure to include > > details of what you were trying to do when this error occurred and > > details on how to reproduce this problem. > > I don't want to understand this as an action to force users to upgrade their > services, but if this is the case, I would had prefer to received a note in > advance. And yes, I received an e-mail from RHN offering new upgrades. The > same day that up2date stop working... :( > > Any comments on this? > Regards, > Tomás > > +-- --+ >Tomás García Ferrari >Bigital >http://bigital.com/ > +-- --+ > > > > ___ > Redhat-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Is RedHat droping the free subscriptors?
Hello, A long time ago, when using the RHN was absolutely free I subscribe myself to it with several systems to check it out. At some point the testing period was over but RH offered the possibility of keeping 1 system registered for free. So I did. Now it seems to be that this service is over. Even if my system is listed like having a "basic" service when I run "up2date -l" I have a note saying this: > Error Message: > Free service limited due to high load, please try again later (server > 142421) > Error Class Code: 51 > Error Class Info: > Due to extremely high traffic, access to Red Hat Network is currently > limited to subscription customers. Please try again later. If you > would like to become a subscription customer, go to > https://rhn.redhat.com/preview/priority_service.pxt for more information. > Explanation: > An error has occurred while processing your request. If this problem > persists please submit a bug report to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > If you choose to submit the bug report, please be sure to include > details of what you were trying to do when this error occurred and > details on how to reproduce this problem. I don't want to understand this as an action to force users to upgrade their services, but if this is the case, I would had prefer to received a note in advance. And yes, I received an e-mail from RHN offering new upgrades. The same day that up2date stop working... :( Any comments on this? Regards, Tomás +-- --+ Tomás García Ferrari Bigital http://bigital.com/ +-- --+ ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Questions on fstab
On 25 Jan 2002 17:52:00 -0800 Brandon Dorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribbled in frustration: > Hello, > > Below is a copy of my /etc/fstab. I can't seem to be able to tweak it > so that upon booting, my normal user account can write to say, the > windows drive (mounted as /dev/hde1, /c of course) I'd like the same > user writing priviledges while staying automounted for the other drives > that at the current have the same settings as the c drive right now. > I'm running RH 7.2 with kernel 2.4.17 and the latest ximian gnome and > rh7.2 updates. === Just a guess here: Try changing "user" to "users" While "user" allows anyone to mount or umount a drive, ONLY the one who mounts owns the device and can umount it. Since /dev/hde1 is being mounted on boot, it is owned by root. "users" allows anyone to umount a device whether they were the ones to mount it or not, I believe. Perhaps that would allow any user to write to the drive also? Worth a try??? Mike PS: There are some security concerns with this method I would think. Perhaps winblows virii ignored by Linux would be able to make their way to your Win partition, now with write privileges ;-( -- "Many loads of beer were brought. What disorder, whoring, fighting, killing, and dreadful idolatry took place there." Baltasar Rusow, Estonia, mid 16th Century ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: [OT] Regular expressions
On Sat, Jan 26, 2002 at 10:43:36AM +0100, Nick Wilson wrote: > Hmmm Thanks guys but I was hoping for something online and *free* :) Nick, Try $ man 7 regex Chances are you'll get a manpage describing POSIX REs. It's a bit opaque to begin with, though. :) I can recommend the Python Regex HOWTO (http://py-howto.sourceforge.net/regex/regex.html). It does a very good job of introducing REs, IMHO, and the concepts apply to other implementations as well...after all, it describes Python's Perl style REs. You might also find something useful here: http://dmoz.org/Computers/Programming/Languages/Regular_Expessions/ HTH, Ben -- Ben Logan: ben at wblogan dot net OpenPGP Key KeyID: A1ADD1F0 Recursion n.: See Recursion. -- Random Shack Data Processing Dictionary msg70125/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [OT] Regular expressions
On Fri, 25 Jan 2002, Jonathan Bartlett wrote: > The O'Reilly Perl book (Programming Perl? It's called the camel book) has > an EXCELLENT chapter on how it works. If you run > > perldoc perlre > > Will also give you excellent information. o'reilly also has an entire book, "mastering regular expressions," but for many situations, it's major overkill. rday ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Clarification of bus error
Hi, I attemped to CTRL+\ when running a text based application. The program then core dumped appropriately. After that point though, I began to receive Bus Errors when running any program. Checking online from my roomie's computer, the advise was to shut down the computer immediately (not software but a hardware shutdown). I did and now everything is back to normal. The question is: What is a Bus Error and what causes it? Thanks for any clarification. -- Ditesh Kumar ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: unsubsribe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * and then Hardeep Singh Bhutter blurted > Pl unsubscribe me Who are you talking to? - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:www.explodingnet.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE8UoEVHpvrrTa6L5oRAhkOAJ9O8SSigCLHxwKVsFoNPbdzdx+2hACcDp3h B5oRGH983NPcsPT3qOKEtGQ= =yM8i -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
unsubsribe
Pl unsubscribe me _ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: [OT] Regular expressions
* and then David Talkington blurted > >Hi > >I'm trying to find a good guide to regexp > >Anyone reccomend a suitable starting point? > > Absolutely. 'Mastering Regular Expressions', Jeffrey E. F. Friedl, > O'Reilly. Covers regex engines of all sorts, rather than just Perl, > though regular expressions are, I think, the most wonderful and > magical part of Perl. Hmmm Thanks guys but I was hoping for something online and *free* :) -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:www.explodingnet.com msg70120/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
