Re: IPTables & Windows Messenger Voice/Video

[Edward Dekkers]

> Last I heard, you needed an experimental kernel module for this.
>
> - -d
>
>
> - --
> David Talkington

Hey There David - nice to hear from you again!!!

Experimental Kernel Module?

My original question asked whether we had made any progress on iptables
modules.

Looking from your above answer that would be yes then. I'll have a scout
around and see if I can find it.

:)

Regards,
Ed.





___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: IPTables & Windows Messenger Voice/Video

[Thorsten Strusch]

Hi Edward,

Edward Dekkers wrote:
>>You are speaking, perhaps of H.323, a protocol which only a
>>standards committee member delegate could love.
>>
>>  see: http://www.openh323.org/
> 
> That's the one I think, yes.
> 
> Unfortunately even that page doesn't tell me how to set up IPTables to allow
> for that protocol though.

have a look at this:
http://www.knowplace.org/netfilter/minifaq.html

and perhaps this could be your solution:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/openh323proxy/

regards
Thorsten



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: IPTables & Windows Messenger Voice/Video

[David Talkington]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Edward Dekkers wrote:

>> You are speaking, perhaps of H.323, a protocol which only a
>> standards committee member delegate could love.

>Unfortunately even that page doesn't tell me how to set up IPTables to allow
>for that protocol though.

Last I heard, you needed an experimental kernel module for this.  

- -d


- -- 
David Talkington

PGP key: http://www.prairienet.org/~dtalk/0xCA4C11AD.pgp

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6

iQA/AwUBPPxZN79BpdPKTBGtEQITWQCgyXGCDzP3kaw4awq1eFQFIGaeEkQAn1gv
7AdQfqmgNeYBqV+YVJNfEA7K
=pZPm
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: IPTables & Windows Messenger Voice/Video

[Edward Dekkers]

> You are speaking, perhaps of H.323, a protocol which only a
> standards committee member delegate could love.
>
>   see: http://www.openh323.org/
>
> -- Russ Herrold

That's the one I think, yes.

Unfortunately even that page doesn't tell me how to set up IPTables to allow
for that protocol though.

:(

Thanks anyway.

Regards,
Ed.




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Problem upgrading to 7.3

[ramakrishna]

hi,
 
> I'm trying to upgrade a machine runing 6.2 to 7.3. The bootable CD runs
> until it says this:
> 
> running /sbin/loader
> install exited abnormally -- received signal 11
> 
> and then it sends termination signals...

 I feel so many people might have experienced this problem in the past because 
whenever there is a 
major version difference there is a lot of changes takin place from the earlier 
bootable kernel images to the
present one. (this is my guess if any one has the actual facts pls enlighten on this 
front)
so the best way to counteract is to backup all the relevent user data/config files. 
and then begin a fresh
7.3 install. also we can make sure that this kind of problems do not repeat in the 
future by keeping our systems 
up2date by moving to the new version/releases as they are made available thru stable 
releases. 

cheers

-rk-
---
Ramakrishna| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exocore Consulting | http://www.exocore.com
Bangalore, India   | +91 (80) 344-0397
---



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: How come then that Wireless didn't become established ...

[Keith Morse]

On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Robert Canary wrote:

> I have two 50 mile 45Meg link.  Expensive (about 10k per end), but after
> the initial cost I pay nothing else.
> 


Just curious, Robert.  How high off the ground are the terminating
endpoints for the 50 Mile link?



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Terminal Services

[ramakrishna]

hi,
> X is designed as a client/server protocol where
> the server (the display) may be on a different machine than the client
> (the program that's being run).
I agree. X-server can be used to query the server and display the server desktop 
at client m/c.
 use this command at the client m/c 
  # X -querywhere  is the server address/hostname  
 

cheers
 
-rk-
---
Ramakrishna| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exocore Consulting | http://www.exocore.com
Bangalore, India   | +91 (80) 344-0397
---



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: Terminal Services

[Keith Morse]

On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, Pranay Kumar wrote:

> I am using rdesktop. Is it what you are looking for?
> 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 4:40 PM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Terminal Services
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > I have been using Windows 2000 Advanced server and i was 
> > > wondering if there is any kind of terminal services software on 
> > > Linux that can project the current X windows session over a 
> > > network to a differnt computer. What i am looking to do is setup 
> > > a Linux file server and basically connect using user logins from 
> > > accross the network to the server so each user had its own area
> etc... 
> > > 
> > > If i could connect accross a network to the server and get it to 
> > > the display the login screen on the workstations it would be 
> > > perfect. If anyone knows how to do this or has any ideas i would 
> > > love to hear from you.

I'm guessing this is the wrong direction from what the original poster 
asked.  rdesktop ->( MS Win desktop on X)  OP was looking for X on X.



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: dhcpcd overwriting /etc/resolv.conf

[C. Linus Hicks]

On Mon, 2002-06-03 at 23:41, Monte Milanuk wrote:
> I have a small problem w/ regard to /etc/resolv.conf keeps getting the
> following written to it (presumably by dhcpcd)
> 
> domain milanuk.net
> nameserver 192.168.1.10
> search milanuk.net 
> 
> I was under the impression that having both the 'search' and 'domain'
> lines in /etc/resolv.conf at the same time was bad juju (dunno why
> specifically).  Where should I start looking(client, server?) to figure
> out how to stop this from happening?

You can use the -R option as documented in the man page with dhcpcd to
prevent it from replacing the existing resolv.conf file to see if that's
where it is happening. I'm curious whether you are having a problem
besides the fact that the file is getting changed...

Linus





___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: IPTables & Windows Messenger Voice/Video

[R P Herrold]

On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, Edward Dekkers wrote:

> This subject touched on when we all made the change to IPTables I recall
> from the list. It was then said that the modules to allow Windows Messenger
> to use voice and video chats would eventually come. (The IPChains ones I
> used to use worked perfectly). 

You are speaking, perhaps of H.323, a protocol which only a 
standards committee member delegate could love.

  see: http://www.openh323.org/

-- Russ Herrold



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

dhcpcd overwriting /etc/resolv.conf

[Monte Milanuk]

I have a small problem w/ regard to /etc/resolv.conf keeps getting the
following written to it (presumably by dhcpcd)

domain milanuk.net
nameserver 192.168.1.10
search milanuk.net 

I was under the impression that having both the 'search' and 'domain'
lines in /etc/resolv.conf at the same time was bad juju (dunno why
specifically).  Where should I start looking(client, server?) to figure
out how to stop this from happening?

TIA,

Monte

-- 
All right, breaks over.  Back on your heads!!



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

IPTables & Windows Messenger Voice/Video

[Edward Dekkers]

This subject touched on when we all made the change to IPTables I recall
from the list. It was then said that the modules to allow Windows Messenger
to use voice and video chats would eventually come. (The IPChains ones I
used to use worked perfectly). It has now been a long while, and a wild
search I did yesterday turned up NADA again EXCEPT for some proxxying /
gateway software to work as a proxy for this kind of thing.

Does anyone how far we are on this issue? - I know it's not a super
important one (hence I never bothered with it before), but I have some
family who sometimes want to talk to me using it, and I have to dial in
manually to do it (bypass all the NAT/Firewalling stuff).

I've tried opening all relevant ports etc. to no avail. The documentation I
DID find on the subject pretty much allready told me this wouldn't work, and
that modules would be available for this functionality 'pretty soon'.

I'm not pressuring anyone to code modules for iptables to do this, as I
fully understand it is all voluntary work, but is there any progress being
made in this area?

Is there some other way to get it working using IPTables rules? (from the
docos doesn't seem so but I'd better ask).

Anyone have experience using one of these proxies/gateways?

TIA.

--
Edward Dekkers (Director)
Triple D Computer Services Pty. Ltd.




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Sawfish and key bindings help

[Blake C. Thornton]

I am having trouble because for some reason my key bindings for some
programs (maple for example) seems to be conflicting with sawfish window
manager (control key sequences).  Its funny because sometimes it works and
then my program crashes and the keys won't work until I log off.

Has anyone dealt with this?

Thanks,
Blake



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: How come then that Wireless didn't become established ...

[Robert Canary]

I have two 50 mile 45Meg link.  Expensive (about 10k per end), but after
the initial cost I pay nothing else.

I have a 17 mile backhual link cost less 5k.

While there are some ocean fiber concting the a few continents, most T1
links around the world are done by satelite.  We have one hop going from
Ashland Kentucky to Honolulu via satelite.

As far as security goes, anything one puts on the internet is wide open
to security problems.  It will not matter if it is wireless or hardwired
(or fiber).  I can actually read your ethernet traffic with a tick
tracer, right through the jacket.

It takes a whole lot more effort for one to get to a wireless WEP key
than it dose to peek in with a sniffer.

Mike Burger wrote:
> 
> Assuming he's talking long distances point-to-point, then he'd have been
> wrong on being able to go longer with wireless than wired, anyhow.
> 
> You can go all the way around the world with wired T1, T3, etc...you can't
> do that with wireless without employing satellites in the process.
> 
> On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Statux wrote:
> 
> > Government restrictions on transmissions over radio frequencies (ie. FCC
> > in the USA), and lack of security.
> >
> > On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Shyam Kumar Mankayil wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I know this may not be a very bright question  
> > >
> > > I guess you can transmit over greater distances using a Wireless setup , ie :
> > >
> > > radio frequencies , than a wired setup .
> > >
> > > Why then are we not sitting in an exclusively wireless world(Internet and all ) ?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Shyam
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -
> > > Sign up to watch the FIFA World Cup video highlights from your desk!
> > >
> > > http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com/fc/en
> >
> >
> 
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

--
robert canary
system services
OhioCounty.Net
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(270)298-9331 Office
(270)298-7449 Fax



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: Terminal Services

[Pranay Kumar]

I am using rdesktop. Is it what you are looking for?

- Pranay

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of fred smith
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 9:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Terminal Services

On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 06:21:44PM -0500, Chad and Doria Skinner wrote:
> Look up VNC

Or if the remote workstations are someting that runs (or can run X)
thenyou don't need VNC. X is designed as a client/server protocol where
the server (the display) may be on a different machine than the client
(the program that's being run).

> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 4:40 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Terminal Services
> > 
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I have been using Windows 2000 Advanced server and i was 
> > wondering if there is any kind of terminal services software on 
> > Linux that can project the current X windows session over a 
> > network to a differnt computer. What i am looking to do is setup 
> > a Linux file server and basically connect using user logins from 
> > accross the network to the server so each user had its own area
etc... 
> > 
> > If i could connect accross a network to the server and get it to 
> > the display the login screen on the workstations it would be 
> > perfect. If anyone knows how to do this or has any ideas i would 
> > love to hear from you.
> > 
> > Thanks for your time...
> > 
> > 
> > Keystone7
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ___
> > Redhat-list mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

-- 
 Fred Smith -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
The Lord is like a strong tower. 
 Those who do what is right can run to him for safety.
--- Proverbs 18:10 (niv)
-



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Cyber Cafe software

[Bret Hughes]

On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Steve Buehler wrote:

> Does anybody know of any software all ready written or what would have to
> be done, to allow us to run a cyber cafe style setup.  What we need the
> software to do is to allow someone to come in and plug in their computer to
> our network (actually a customers network).  They want the following:
> 1.  A customer comes in and signs up starting a clock so they could charge
> the customer for the time.
> 2.  They want it to work for wired or wireless networks.  So when they sign
> in, it would either have to set their IP address on their machine
> automatically, or we would have to give them an IP address to put in to
> their system.
> 3.  It would have to send a report once a day to an email address (or
> multiple email addresses) with the days summary of time used and amount of
> money made.
> 4.  A regular customer could come in and use the same login each time so
> that they could track everything over long periods of time, on a per
> customer basis.  They might want to give discounts to these people and/or
> give away free stuff.  Kind of likefor every minute someone has been
> on, they get one credit point.  Those credit points can be used for
> purchasing extra time, or other products in the business.  Now, if it is
> kept in a mysql database, than that would not be hard to pull.
>
> I know that there are cyber cafe's out there now, so I am assuming that I
> should not have to reinvent the wheel for this software.  If not, how would
> somebody go about setting this up.  Basically, if I could get it set up so
> that ALL IP addresses on the local network are not allowed in unless they
> sign in first, than what file would it have to put that IP address in and
> what would have to be restarted to allow that customer access?  Preferably,
> I would like the program to work with RedHat Linux, PHP and MySQL.
>
> Thanks In Advance
> Steve Buehler

Steve I am sitting in a cyber cafe right now in Las Vegas, and no inspite
of what the reservations people tell you there is no highspeed internet
connectivity in the Flamingo Hilton.  Pisses me off but I will leave that
for tomorrow.

Any way I have used these types of thing occationally while traveling
probably 3 or four times but have yet to see anyone do this cleverly.  It
is usually writting your name on a peice of paper with the time and then
paying as you leave.

However If I was going to try to do this I would probably start with a
simple php generated html form that everyone should be able to use and
have them obtain an address via dhcp but have the firewall setup to block
all outgoing except for those that have logged in vi the php page.  THe
phph script would of course have the ipaddress since that is part of the
http packet and could then build a FW rule that would allow the machine to
hit the net.

Then logging off via the same page would then kill the rule and tell them
how much they owe.  I don't know what happens when the shut down the
machine without logging off but I am sure some business pratice could be
put in place mabye a $2 stupid charge.

If you wanted to get real fancy , I guess the php page could take a credit
card and bill them automatically after verifying of course.


Now, having said all that I have not seen this anywhere but would start as
you have asking qestions and probably googling and freshmeat.

Bret




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Print job ordering/grouping w. color paper separator

[Karl O . Pinc]

Hi,

I can't seem to find the answer in the LPRng HOWTO or the list archives,
and somebody must know how to do this...  If this isn't the
right place to ask, please tell me where I can go.  TIA.

I've got 3 print jobs, one text and two postscript.  (Really
there are 2 pdfs but I'm using pdftops and piping to lpr.)
The text job is supposed to print on tray 3, colored paper,
as a separator.  Then the two postscript jobs should print.
All of this should happen in the order submitted.  It's not.

I've defined two printers, one for each tray.  Both printers
are defined to use the same print queue.  I try something
like:

#!/bin/bash
echo cover1 | lpr -P tray3
pdftops small.pdf | lpr -P tray2
pdftops big.pdf | lpr -P tray2
echo cover2 | lpr -P tray3
pdftops small.pdf | lpr -P tray2
pdftops big.pdf | lpr -P tray2
echo cover3 | lpr -P tray3
pdftops small.pdf | lpr -P tray2
pdftops big.pdf | lpr -P tray2
echo cover4 | lpr -P tray3
pdftops small.pdf | lpr -P tray2
pdftops big.pdf | lpr -P tray2

I usually get a couple of cover sheets first, a small.pdf,
another cover sheet, a couple of small.pdfs and then
a big.pdf, maybe a small.pdf and the rest of the big.pdfs.

(?  The whole printing subsystem looks like voodo.  I can
see very little by looking at the printconf.  I _thought_
jobs were first-in first-out.  Maybe they don't go in
until they get through the input filter?)

I'm using RedHat 7.2 with LPRng 3.7.4 (redhat release 28),
which uses magicfilter as the input filter and am printing
over the network to a HP 4100-tn laser printer.  The printer
driver is "lj5gray".

It occured to me to use lpr -B job1 job2 job3, but I don't
know how I can then select the right tray for each job.

It'd be enough to be able to get the burst page to
print from a different tray, although not ideal.

I'd like a solution that integrates with the existing
print config system so upgrading the OS doesn't break it.
(But I'll take anything.)

Karl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: off topic - Openssh question

[Karl O . Pinc]

On the machine which initiates the scp you use ssh-keygen (RTFM) to
generate a public/private key pair with no password.  Do this as the
user that needs access, or copy the resulting key pair into that user's
home directory.  Then you copy
the public key ($HOME/.ssh/identity.pub) onto the machine you want
to access ($HOME/.ssh/authorized_keys).  The user on the client will
then be able to ssh stuff as the user (whatever home directory you used)
on the server without needing to specify a password to gain access.

-

off topic - Openssh question

hi all gurus,
I've got openssh_2.9.9p2 on my Redhat linux 6.2 servers . i've moved the 
servers to another and there has been a change in the IP address.There 
servers copy files from the servers at previous locations with scp using 
preshared keys.
i'm not much familiar with the preshared keys.Can you please guide me what 
I have to do for the servers to perform normal operations as being done 
previously.

Any suggestions will be greatly appreciated.

-Regards,

Peram



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Terminal Services

[fred smith]

On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 06:21:44PM -0500, Chad and Doria Skinner wrote:
> Look up VNC

Or if the remote workstations are someting that runs (or can run X)
thenyou don't need VNC. X is designed as a client/server protocol where
the server (the display) may be on a different machine than the client
(the program that's being run).

> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 4:40 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Terminal Services
> > 
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I have been using Windows 2000 Advanced server and i was 
> > wondering if there is any kind of terminal services software on 
> > Linux that can project the current X windows session over a 
> > network to a differnt computer. What i am looking to do is setup 
> > a Linux file server and basically connect using user logins from 
> > accross the network to the server so each user had its own area etc... 
> > 
> > If i could connect accross a network to the server and get it to 
> > the display the login screen on the workstations it would be 
> > perfect. If anyone knows how to do this or has any ideas i would 
> > love to hear from you.
> > 
> > Thanks for your time...
> > 
> > 
> > Keystone7
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ___
> > Redhat-list mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

-- 
 Fred Smith -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
The Lord is like a strong tower. 
 Those who do what is right can run to him for safety.
--- Proverbs 18:10 (niv) -



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: AT&T Broadband on RH7.3

[David Talkington]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Michael H. Warfield wrote:

>   OH!  One other "gotcha", if you are like me with other interfaces.
>You have to set "PEERDNS=no" if you don't want it to screw with your
>DNS setup...  If all you have is the broadband (I also have 4 ISDN BRI's
>which route static IP addresses at a lower speed) then you don't need
>that.  Unfortunately, I didn't WANT to use their DNS servers or search
>attbi.com for my domain resolutions...  :-)

I feel the same way, but I've been borking with DHCPCDARGS in the
network scripts ... figures there'd be an easier way.  Thanks for the
tip.

- -d

- -- 
David Talkington

PGP key: http://www.prairienet.org/~dtalk/0xCA4C11AD.pgp

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6

iQA/AwUBPPwVNb9BpdPKTBGtEQKrHQCeNacDiKSueYOOxT8DwtqpqVpFdFkAn1Y8
RO6rsNaGG6Z6PriCbLvgTrft
=Ft4d
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: MASQ PoP3 traffic ?

[Mike Burger]

You use a DNAT rule to NAT/route an external address, or, at the very 
least, port 110 (the POP3 port), to an internal system on that port.

Works quite well...and is as simple as:

$IPTABLES -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -d xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx -p tcp --dport 110 -j DNAT 
--to yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy
$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -p tcp --dport 110 -m state --state NEW -d yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy -j 
ACCEPT

xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx is either the external (internet IP) address of your 
firewall, or an additional external address, which your firewall will 
answer to, but gets routed internally.

yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy is the private, internal address of your POP3 server.

On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, Darryl Harvey wrote:

> I have a RH7.3 box with 2 x NIC's as a gateway/firewall.
> 
> Internal adddress are private 192.168.x.x range, external IP is 
> public.   No-one in the internal network has access externally except 
> through SQUID which runs n this box, as does an email relay (Which only 
> relays for internal domains.
> 
> I need to allow external users PoP3 access to our real mail server which is 
> on a private IP behind the linux box.
> 
> Do I need to use a module to allow this to happen, or can IPChains/tables 
> do this by default (And how).
> 
> Also, which tool should I use within either KDE or Gnome to alter these 
> rules, or is it something I do via shell (Which I am happy with)
> 
> TIA
> Darryl
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> 



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Problem upgrading to 7.3

[Tomás García Ferrari]

Hello,

I'm trying to upgrade a machine runing 6.2 to 7.3. The bootable CD runs
until it says this:

running /sbin/loader
install exited abnormally -- received signal 11

and then it sends termination signals...

I try to find sth on google about this, but I didn't find anything usable...
Any advice or ideas?

Regards,
Tomás

+----+
Tomás García Ferrari
Bigital
http://bigital.com/
+----+



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: How come then that Wireless didn't become established ...

[Mike Burger]

Assuming he's talking long distances point-to-point, then he'd have been 
wrong on being able to go longer with wireless than wired, anyhow.  

You can go all the way around the world with wired T1, T3, etc...you can't 
do that with wireless without employing satellites in the process.

On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Statux wrote:

> Government restrictions on transmissions over radio frequencies (ie. FCC
> in the USA), and lack of security.
> 
> On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Shyam Kumar Mankayil wrote:
> 
> >
> > I know this may not be a very bright question  
> >
> > I guess you can transmit over greater distances using a Wireless setup , ie :
> >
> > radio frequencies , than a wired setup .
> >
> > Why then are we not sitting in an exclusively wireless world(Internet and all ) ?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Shyam
> >
> >
> >
> > -
> > Sign up to watch the FIFA World Cup video highlights from your desk!
> >
> > http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com/fc/en
> 
> 



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: installing X by non super user.

[Gordon Messmer]

On Mon, 2002-06-03 at 11:12, David Talkington wrote:
> 
> Just wanted to draw that distinction, since user-installable software on 
> a secure system is not a familiar concept to people who come from other 
> operating systems.

Good point to make.  I normally create ~/root as software root for
installation:

mkdir ~/{bin,etc,lib,mnt,tmp,share}

Compile software with:
./configure --prefix=/home/gordon/root
make

I also tend to SUID root smbmount and smbumount so that I can use
LinNeighborhood to mount windows shares in ~/mnt/SERVERNAME/SHARE.




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: kernel: Cannot find map file

[Statux]

Usually found at /boot/System-map

If you've recompiled a kernel or something, then you have to copy the
System-map that gets created over to /boot or wherever you put your boot
stuff. If you haven't touched anything and you're using an RPM'd kernel,
then reinstall it.

On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, LuisMi wrote:

> -pgpenvelope processed message
>
> What is this?
> Jun  3 12:23:28 echelon kernel: Cannot find map file.
>
> --
> Luis Miguel Cruz.
>
> PGP KEY: 0x3AC52657   |   [ADPSOFT] http://www.adpsoft.com
> |  "Connecting your business"
>
> -pgpenvelope information
> Hash: SHA1
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
>
> gpg: Warning: using insecure memory!
> gpg: Signature made Mon Jun  3 09:21:14 2002 EDT using DSA key ID 3AC52657
> gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
>
> pgpenvelope_decrypt: message processed at Mon Jun  3 17:27:36 2002
>
> -end pgpenvelope information
>
>
>
> ___
> Seawolf-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/seawolf-list
>

-- 




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: How come then that Wireless didn't become established ...

[Statux]

Government restrictions on transmissions over radio frequencies (ie. FCC
in the USA), and lack of security.

On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Shyam Kumar Mankayil wrote:

>
> I know this may not be a very bright question  
>
> I guess you can transmit over greater distances using a Wireless setup , ie :
>
> radio frequencies , than a wired setup .
>
> Why then are we not sitting in an exclusively wireless world(Internet and all ) ?
>
> Regards,
>
> Shyam
>
>
>
> -
> Sign up to watch the FIFA World Cup video highlights from your desk!
>
> http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com/fc/en

-- 




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

rpmfind not installing

[Martín Marqués]

Has somebody tried to install rpmfind from the 7.3 distro (always on a 7.3 
installation). I got a stupid dependency, and had to rebuild from the src.rpm 
and the install.

Very odd. 

-- 
Porqué usar una base de datos relacional cualquiera,
si podés usar PostgreSQL?
-
Martín Marqués  |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Programador, Administrador, DBA |   Centro de Telematica
   Universidad Nacional
del Litoral
-



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Terminal Services

[keystone7]

Hi,

I have been using Windows 2000 Advanced server and i was wondering if there is any 
kind of terminal services software on Linux that can project the current X windows 
session over a network to a differnt computer. What i am looking to do is setup a 
Linux file server and basically connect using user logins from accross the network to 
the server so each user had its own area etc... 

If i could connect accross a network to the server and get it to the display the login 
screen on the workstations it would be perfect. If anyone knows how to do this or has 
any ideas i would love to hear from you.

Thanks for your time...


Keystone7
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: AT&T Broadband on RH7.3

[Michael H. Warfield]

On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 02:27:51PM -0600, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
> "Michael H. Warfield" wrote:

> > When he said it was ready, I "ifup'ed"
> > the interface and a couple seconds later was pleased to see "obtaining
> > information for eth0" followed by "[OK]".  He was impressed (and surprised,
> > I think he thought it would be trouble and it was a peice of cake).

> Am I correct in assuming that all you did was set eth0 to use DHCP then, no other
> configs anywhere to comply with their stupid network crap?

Correct.

Originally, this was a RedHat 6.2 system and it was a bit more
complicated, mostly because the default dhcp client was pump.  That
cause more problems than anything else, mostly with renewing links.
Now I'm on RedHat 7.3 and the default is dhcpcd and it works like a
charm.  Just specify dhcp as the boot protocol and a way you go.

OH!  One other "gotcha", if you are like me with other interfaces.
You have to set "PEERDNS=no" if you don't want it to screw with your
DNS setup...  If all you have is the broadband (I also have 4 ISDN BRI's
which route static IP addresses at a lower speed) then you don't need
that.  Unfortunately, I didn't WANT to use their DNS servers or search
attbi.com for my domain resolutions...  :-)

> > This is down in Atlanta Georgia, formery Media One, formerly
> > Wometco, formerly Gwinnett Cable.  You're milage may vary in your
> > location.  :-/

> Can the list be any longer?  At least here it's just TCI, then AT&T...

AT&T itself varies depending upon what infrastructure they
have purchased.  AT&T down here may be very different from AT&T
somewhere else.  The list may be short, but the gotcha may surprise you.

> --
> W | I haven't lost my mind; it's backed up on tape somewhere.
>   +
>   Ashley M. Kirchner    .   303.442.6410 x130
>   IT Director / SysAdmin / WebSmith . 800.441.3873 x130
>   Photo Craft Laboratories, Inc.. 3550 Arapahoe Ave. #6
>   http://www.pcraft.com . .  ..   Boulder, CO 80303, U.S.A.

Mike
-- 
 Michael H. Warfield|  (770) 985-6132   |  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  /\/\|=mhw=|\/\/   |  (678) 463-0932   |  http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
  NIC whois:  MHW9  |  An optimist believes we live in the best of all
 PGP Key: 0xDF1DD471|  possible worlds.  A pessimist is sure of it!



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Finding out whether kernel is i386 or i686?

[Michael Fratoni]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Monday 03 June 2002 04:48 pm, Marco Shaw wrote:
> I have a PIII, and am trying to figure out whether the i386-optimized
> kernel was installed or the i686 was.  I'm assuming it's the i686 one,
> but how can I prove this (uname -a, rpm -q, etc.)?

Try this:
$ rpm -q kernel --qf "%{NAME}-%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE} was built for the
%{ARCH}.\n"

Output here is:
kernel-2.4.18-4 was built for the athlon.

- -- 
- -Michael

pgp key:  http://www.tuxfan.homeip.net:8080/gpgkey.txt
Red Hat Linux 7.2 in 8M of RAM: http://www.rule-project.org/
- --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAjz73w8ACgkQn/07WoAb/Ss7pgCfZmtyd5ypciBckDB4somF2A76
jMMAn1xB3vmg/hLr2HbmwcgoAWnFuuSJ
=RsMi
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Migrating Outlook Express messages

[keystone7]

>  from:"=?iso-8859-1?Q?Ricardo_J._M=E9ndez_Castro?=" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  date:Sat, 01 Jun 2002 20:51:53
>  to:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  subject: Re: Migrating Outlook Express messages
> 
> 
> Hi again,
> 
> After getting my scanner recognized, the main thing that's stopping me from turning 
>Linux into my main platform is the huge amount of e-mail that I have on Outlook 
>Express folders.   Can anyone recommend an e-mail client (K-Mail, Evolution, 
>whatever) that has a good working migration program for Outlook Express 6?
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> 
> 
> 
> Ricardo J. Méndez Castro   http://www.sheertalent.com/rmendez/
> ---
> "Most people have too exalted an idea of what art must be to
>  connect their own impulses to create with delivering themselves."
>  -- David Cronenberg
Hi,

Im not sure about migration, but i`ve found Evolution to be on the best mail programs 
i`ve used. Im not sure if you have tryed this program or not but i generally use a 
program called Turnpike in windows. Ive found that to be really good and i`ve never 
had a problem with it. You may be able to run it on Linux using Wine (my next 
project):) If you are interested you should be able to it from ftp.demon.co.uk under 
the directory of Turnpike. 

Hope this helps


Keystone7
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Finding out whether kernel is i386 or i686?

[David McGlone]

On Monday 03 June 2002 04:48 pm, Marco Shaw wrote:
> I have a PIII, and am trying to figure out whether the i386-optimized
> kernel was installed or the i686 was.  I'm assuming it's the i686 one,
> but how can I prove this (uname -a, rpm -q, etc.)?

Control center will tell you.
-- 
David McGlone.
Edification Web Solutions
http://www.edificationweb.com
--



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Infrared 101 help

[dbrett]

I am trying to understand how to get the Infrared port working on my laptop
with RedHat 7.2.  I have been reading a web page howto, it did a good job
of confusing me even more.

http://mobilix.org/Infrared-HOWTO/Infrared-HOWTO.html

My object is to be able to sync my palm pilot up with the Infrared port.
I have been using J-Pilot as the client software on my computer.

If somebody would be kind enough to point me to another webpage, I would
appreciate it.

david




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: AT&T Broadband on RH7.3

[Ashley M. Kirchner]

David Talkington wrote:

> Speed, however, is very disappointing so far, compared to the Earthlink
> DSL link I lost when I moved.

Downlink I don't have a problem with, it's the uplink that really pisses me off:
128Kbit up, 1.5Mbit down.  I should've stuck with DST.  Maybe I'll get it back, and
figure out a way to traffic shape myself to hell and back (sending upstream data
through one, and downstream through the other)

--
W | I haven't lost my mind; it's backed up on tape somewhere.
  +
  Ashley M. Kirchner    .   303.442.6410 x130
  IT Director / SysAdmin / WebSmith . 800.441.3873 x130
  Photo Craft Laboratories, Inc.. 3550 Arapahoe Ave. #6
  http://www.pcraft.com . .  ..   Boulder, CO 80303, U.S.A.





___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Cdrom Reading

[keystone7]

>  from:Greg Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  date:Mon, 03 Jun 2002 21:28:52
>  to:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  subject: Re: Cdrom Reading
> 
> About every 30 seconds I see the light on my Cdrom turn on and it looks like its 
>seaking for a cdrom.  When this occurs my system pauses and waits for about 3 
>seconds.  Does anyone know what is causing this and what I can do to make it stop.  
> 
> I have a Scsi Cdrom and Burner if that could make a difference.
> 
> Thanks,
> Greg R

Hi,

Its probably down to the system rescanning the scsi bus. Is you Hard drive scsi as 
well? I had the same problem with a Panasonic PD system. The best thing you can do is 
check you current kernel and see what support for scsi there is in there, you may find 
getting a more up to kernel may help with this problem.

Keystone7
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Keystone7
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: AT&T Broadband on RH7.3

[David Talkington]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:

>Does anyone have RH7.3 (or 7.2, doesn't matter) running with AT&T Broadband
>(using a LinkSys BEFCMU10 Cable Modem) ?  Right now I have this thing connected
>to my Win2000 machine, but I'd like to connect it to my Linux box, and set it
>up as a firewall.  However, I seem to recall during the installation on
>Windows, it asked for my account and registration to install and work.  How
>does this work on Linux?  Do I just set eth0 to DHCP and assume it'll work when
>I boot the system up?  Any caveats I need to be aware of?

My experience with ATTBI in Seattle was much more favorable than my
experience last year with AT&T @Home in mid-Illinois.  They seem to have
finally got their sh*t together in several ways.  Most importantly,
there were no MAC address gymnastics; what they register now is the
_modem_, not my ethernet card.  Doesn't matter what card I plug into the
modem.

I ran through their setup screen on a Win98 laptop, then plugged in my
Linux gateway and it took a DHCP address immediately (used dhcpcd; pump
didn't seem to work).  Easiest broadband setup I've done.  

Their modem is hardcoded to connect to one specific website, and that's
the only site it can reach until you're authenticated.  I didn't try to
do this step with a Linux browser, but I bet it would work ... give it a
try.  You can get this address by sniffing your traffic while running
the Windows setup program, but it might be easier to just call support
and tell them you had trouble with the Windows authentication (which was
true in my case); they'll then give you the appropriate web address to
try, and you can enter your account number and whatnot there.

Speed, however, is very disappointing so far, compared to the Earthlink 
DSL link I lost when I moved.

- -d


- -- 
David Talkington

PGP key: http://www.prairienet.org/~dtalk/0xCA4C11AD.pgp

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6

iQA/AwUBPPvT879BpdPKTBGtEQKuiwCgrSvdhxCFM+QpqSgLnuImfYhuOiEAnRrG
k9gC3ax9ajfFES4OuDhX41+W
=C4L0
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: AT&T Broadband on RH7.3

[Carter, Shaun G]

I also had no problems with my setup apart from the "we don't support Linux"
comment.  Simply ifup'd through my Linksys cable router set as a DHCP server
and pulling DHCP from comcast@home (not quite the same company, but I just
switched from AT&T to Comcast when they bought out my area).  Had everything
running within seconds of the tech finishing his job.

Shaun
Riverview, MI

-Original Message-
From: Michael H. Warfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 4:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: AT&T Broadband on RH7.3


On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 02:11:14PM -0600, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
> 
> Does anyone have RH7.3 (or 7.2, doesn't matter) running with AT&T
Broadband
> (using a LinkSys BEFCMU10 Cable Modem) ?  Right now I have this thing
connected
> to my Win2000 machine, but I'd like to connect it to my Linux box, and set
it
> up as a firewall.  However, I seem to recall during the installation on
> Windows, it asked for my account and registration to install and work.
How
> does this work on Linux?  Do I just set eth0 to DHCP and assume it'll work
when
> I boot the system up?  Any caveats I need to be aware of?

I'm currently connected up with RedHat 7.3 on my firewall.
But I'm using a Toshiba PCX1100U cable modem.

All I had to do is give the installer the MAC address of my
ethernet card and the MAC address of my cable modem.  When he arrived
to "install" it and the digital cable TV converter, he looked at my
systems and asked "what is it running, Linux?"  When I said "yes", he
said "I don't think we support Linux."  I told him, "That's right, you
just support providing me with a broadband interface.  I support Linux."
I gave him the numbers and he called them in.  He needed an account name,
but that was only for the E-Mail address, it had nothing to do with getting
the broadband interface to work.  When he said it was ready, I "ifup'ed"
the interface and a couple seconds later was pleased to see "obtaining
information for eth0" followed by "[OK]".  He was impressed (and surprised,
I think he thought it would be trouble and it was a peice of cake).

This is down in Atlanta Georgia, formery Media One, formerly
Wometco, formerly Gwinnett Cable.  You're milage may vary in your
location.  :-/

> --
> W | I haven't lost my mind; it's backed up on tape somewhere.
>   +
>   Ashley M. Kirchner    .   303.442.6410 x130
>   IT Director / SysAdmin / WebSmith . 800.441.3873 x130
>   Photo Craft Laboratories, Inc.. 3550 Arapahoe Ave. #6
>   http://www.pcraft.com . .  ..   Boulder, CO 80303, U.S.A.

Mike
-- 
 Michael H. Warfield|  (770) 985-6132   |  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  /\/\|=mhw=|\/\/   |  (678) 463-0932   |  http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
  NIC whois:  MHW9  |  An optimist believes we live in the best of all
 PGP Key: 0xDF1DD471|  possible worlds.  A pessimist is sure of it!



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Finding out whether kernel is i386 or i686?

[Marco Shaw]

I have a PIII, and am trying to figure out whether the i386-optimized
kernel was installed or the i686 was.  I'm assuming it's the i686 one,
but how can I prove this (uname -a, rpm -q, etc.)?

Marco



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Cdrom Reading

[Greg Robertson]

About every 30 seconds I see the light on my Cdrom 
turn on and it looks like its seaking for a cdrom.  When this occurs my 
system pauses and waits for about 3 seconds.  Does anyone know what is 
causing this and what I can do to make it stop.  
 
I have a Scsi Cdrom and Burner if that could make a 
difference.
 
Thanks,
Greg R

Re: AT&T Broadband on RH7.3

[Ashley M. Kirchner]

"Michael H. Warfield" wrote:

> When he said it was ready, I "ifup'ed"
> the interface and a couple seconds later was pleased to see "obtaining
> information for eth0" followed by "[OK]".  He was impressed (and surprised,
> I think he thought it would be trouble and it was a peice of cake).

Am I correct in assuming that all you did was set eth0 to use DHCP then, no other
configs anywhere to comply with their stupid network crap?


> This is down in Atlanta Georgia, formery Media One, formerly
> Wometco, formerly Gwinnett Cable.  You're milage may vary in your
> location.  :-/

Can the list be any longer?  At least here it's just TCI, then AT&T...

--
W | I haven't lost my mind; it's backed up on tape somewhere.
  +
  Ashley M. Kirchner    .   303.442.6410 x130
  IT Director / SysAdmin / WebSmith . 800.441.3873 x130
  Photo Craft Laboratories, Inc.. 3550 Arapahoe Ave. #6
  http://www.pcraft.com . .  ..   Boulder, CO 80303, U.S.A.





___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: AT&T Broadband on RH7.3

[Michael H. Warfield]

On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 02:11:14PM -0600, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
> 
> Does anyone have RH7.3 (or 7.2, doesn't matter) running with AT&T Broadband
> (using a LinkSys BEFCMU10 Cable Modem) ?  Right now I have this thing connected
> to my Win2000 machine, but I'd like to connect it to my Linux box, and set it
> up as a firewall.  However, I seem to recall during the installation on
> Windows, it asked for my account and registration to install and work.  How
> does this work on Linux?  Do I just set eth0 to DHCP and assume it'll work when
> I boot the system up?  Any caveats I need to be aware of?

I'm currently connected up with RedHat 7.3 on my firewall.
But I'm using a Toshiba PCX1100U cable modem.

All I had to do is give the installer the MAC address of my
ethernet card and the MAC address of my cable modem.  When he arrived
to "install" it and the digital cable TV converter, he looked at my
systems and asked "what is it running, Linux?"  When I said "yes", he
said "I don't think we support Linux."  I told him, "That's right, you
just support providing me with a broadband interface.  I support Linux."
I gave him the numbers and he called them in.  He needed an account name,
but that was only for the E-Mail address, it had nothing to do with getting
the broadband interface to work.  When he said it was ready, I "ifup'ed"
the interface and a couple seconds later was pleased to see "obtaining
information for eth0" followed by "[OK]".  He was impressed (and surprised,
I think he thought it would be trouble and it was a peice of cake).

This is down in Atlanta Georgia, formery Media One, formerly
Wometco, formerly Gwinnett Cable.  You're milage may vary in your
location.  :-/

> --
> W | I haven't lost my mind; it's backed up on tape somewhere.
>   +
>   Ashley M. Kirchner    .   303.442.6410 x130
>   IT Director / SysAdmin / WebSmith . 800.441.3873 x130
>   Photo Craft Laboratories, Inc.. 3550 Arapahoe Ave. #6
>   http://www.pcraft.com . .  ..   Boulder, CO 80303, U.S.A.

Mike
-- 
 Michael H. Warfield|  (770) 985-6132   |  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  /\/\|=mhw=|\/\/   |  (678) 463-0932   |  http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
  NIC whois:  MHW9  |  An optimist believes we live in the best of all
 PGP Key: 0xDF1DD471|  possible worlds.  A pessimist is sure of it!



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

AT&T Broadband on RH7.3

[Ashley M. Kirchner]

Does anyone have RH7.3 (or 7.2, doesn't matter) running with AT&T Broadband
(using a LinkSys BEFCMU10 Cable Modem) ?  Right now I have this thing connected
to my Win2000 machine, but I'd like to connect it to my Linux box, and set it
up as a firewall.  However, I seem to recall during the installation on
Windows, it asked for my account and registration to install and work.  How
does this work on Linux?  Do I just set eth0 to DHCP and assume it'll work when
I boot the system up?  Any caveats I need to be aware of?

--
W | I haven't lost my mind; it's backed up on tape somewhere.
  +
  Ashley M. Kirchner    .   303.442.6410 x130
  IT Director / SysAdmin / WebSmith . 800.441.3873 x130
  Photo Craft Laboratories, Inc.. 3550 Arapahoe Ave. #6
  http://www.pcraft.com . .  ..   Boulder, CO 80303, U.S.A.





___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Linux-friendly MP3 player?

[Jason Costomiris]

On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 10:19:39AM -0500, Justin Ellison wrote:
:   Looking into freeing up some hard drive space on my laptop, and
: thinking about getting an MP3 player.  What does everyone have, how do
: you like it?  Windows is not an option - if it doesn't work in Linux,
: I'm not getting it.

I've got a Rio800.  I only use it with my winxp notebook (belongs to work),
but could just as easily use it with my other systems (Linux), using
rioutil: http://rioutil.sourceforge.net

When I had a Rio500, it worked great under Linux too.

-- 
Jason Costomiris <><   |  Technologist, geek, human.
jcostom {at} jasons {dot} org  |  http://www.jasons.org/ 
  Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.
My account, My opinions.



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: installing X by non super user.

[David Talkington]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Gordon Messmer wrote:

>> Is it possible to install X (X server and simple X window manager)
>> by non-super user? (on RH)
>
>It isn't.  It's not even possible to install the X server from source in
>an alternate location as a non-root user, since some executables
>(notably the server itself) have to be SUID to function correctly. 
>Non-root users can not create SUID root binaries.
>
>If you want non-root users to be able to install software, you need to
>at least install "sudo" and configure it.  This can allow specific users
>to execute some (or all) programs as the root user.

I would qualify this a bit by making it clear that X, presumably due to 
its hardware-access requirements, is a special case.  Most software 
certainly can be installed and run by a normal user, by specifying a 
- --prefix that is user-writable (e.g., home directory).

Another category of exceptions to this rule includes server software 
that requires access to ports below 1024 and cannot or should not be 
moved to a high port.

Just wanted to draw that distinction, since user-installable software on 
a secure system is not a familiar concept to people who come from other 
operating systems.

Cheers -d


- -- 
David Talkington

PGP key: http://www.prairienet.org/~dtalk/0xCA4C11AD.pgp

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6

iQA/AwUBPPuxfr9BpdPKTBGtEQLgrgCfefUk6NO0uHzxwrU1h1TCZyecGowAoOnH
mzaYb2uGTloNwM+O6RG885bm
=pkIa
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: installing X by non super user.

[Gordon Messmer]

On Mon, 2002-06-03 at 10:25, Brian Lee wrote:
> Is it possible to install X (X server and simple X window manager)
> by non-super user? (on RH)

It isn't.  It's not even possible to install the X server from source in
an alternate location as a non-root user, since some executables
(notably the server itself) have to be SUID to function correctly. 
Non-root users can not create SUID root binaries.

If you want non-root users to be able to install software, you need to
at least install "sudo" and configure it.  This can allow specific users
to execute some (or all) programs as the root user.




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: about chroot wu-ftpd; was->Re: Re: the port 41430?I was cracked:-(

[Gordon Messmer]

On Mon, 2002-06-03 at 01:09, Lewi wrote:
> oh, ic
> in what I'm thinking now it's clear now that running proftpd is better than wu-ftpd
> because I see that proftpd ran as non-root user

Only the root user can chroot().  If proftpd is run as non-root, you
lose that capability.




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: pine

[Monte Milanuk]

On Mon, 3 Jun 2002 13:37:28 -0400 (EDT)
Gordon Charrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Does the version of pine supplied by RedHat support imap? If so, I've 
> never been able to find how to configure it from the setup menus.
> 

Go to Main > Setup > Configure  Then explore the options there.  There
is help available on each one.  They explain pretty well how to set
things up to access IMAP, etc.  If you still need more help, try Nancy
McGough's excellent resource at:

http://www.ii.com/internet/messaging/pine/

HTH,

Monte

-- 
All right, breaks over.  Back on your heads!!



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

pine

[Gordon Charrick]

Does the version of pine supplied by RedHat support imap? If so, I've 
never been able to find how to configure it from the setup menus.

-- 
Gordon Charrick
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ - 70211608



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

installing X by non super user.

[Brian Lee]

Is it possible to install X (X server and simple X window manager)
by non-super user? (on RH)



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: [REDHAT] Linux-friendly MP3 player?

[David Kramer]

On 3 Jun 2002, Justin Ellison wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
>   Looking into freeing up some hard drive space on my laptop, and
> thinking about getting an MP3 player.  What does everyone have, how do
> you like it?  Windows is not an option - if it doesn't work in Linux,
> I'm not getting it.

When I did research in this area a few months ago, I found that all of the
memory-based units that I liked were either discontinued or rumored to be
close to it.  Especially the higher-end ones with large displays and ID3
support.  It was very frustrating.  And the hard drive ones are still 
pretty expensive.  I'll bet the USB ones would work pretty flawlessly with 
Linux though.

I do know that KDE comes with software to work with the Diamond Rio.  
Google for "krio" or look on freshmeat.net.

The other option, which might even work better, would be to get a card 
reader for whatever kind of memory is used by the MP3 player you choose.  
Just put in the card and mount it, copy over files like it was a hard 
drive.  It should be much faster.

I'll tell you what I did though: I bought a CD-based mp3 player, and I am 
very happy with the decision.  You burn MP3's to disk and you wipe them 
off the hard drive.  Done.  Don't forget that the largest capacity 
memory-based one is 128MB, so you still need to keep the rest of your 
collection on your computer to swap in and out.  But once you burn them on 
CD you're done.  For the record, I have a Creative SP90 player.  Very 
happy with it.  I wanted the next one up with the radio, but that was 
about $90 more.

Good luck.

   David Kramer [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://thekramers.net
DK KD One last warning: don't believe anything that you read in this
DKK D document.  Every effort has been made to ensure that this document 
DK KD is incomplete and inaccurate, and I take no responsibility for an
  glimmers of correct information that may, by some fluke, be here.
   UW_IMAP documentation



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Linux-friendly MP3 player?

[daniel]

i went looking for answers to this question on google
but didn't spend too much time

this might be helpful though:
  http://plus24.com/mp3-howto/mp3-howto-24.html

_
daniel a. g. quinn
starving programmer

this is your life and it's ending one minute at a time.
 - tyler Durden, "fight club"



- Original Message - 
> XMMS (www.wmms.org) is a great mp3 player.  If the laptop is tight on
> resources you might also want to look at mpg123 (www.mpg123.org) with the
> gqmpeg front-end (http://gqmpeg.sourceforge.net/).
> 
> AE
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Justin Ellison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 11:20 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Linux-friendly MP3 player?
> 
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Looking into freeing up some hard drive space on my laptop, and
> thinking about getting an MP3 player.  What does everyone have, how do
> you like it?  Windows is not an option - if it doesn't work in Linux,
> I'm not getting it.
> 
> Justin
> 
> -- 
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
> 
> iD8DBQA8hO+VBOGVGcv6DNwRAnATAJ41CA57cwrv71e3qhTzVFv2Pz6j0QCgonV7
> TPZfyZ+m7eZX3oHeZ3YhT9E=
> =fFbZ
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> 



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Question about PCMCIA networking

[Matthew Bradford]

Ok here is something quite odd:

tcpdump shows the arp reply from the server as: arp reply 192.168.0.5 is-at
0:e0:98:88:3a:2b
while on the client it shows the correct MAC address: 0:e0:98:98:3a:3b

I have tried hardwiring both with the following command in
/etc/pcmcia/config.opts:

module "pcnet_cs" opts "hw_addr=0x00,0xe0,0x98,0x88,0x3a,0x2b"

I feel like I am getting somewhere... thing is though.. this low level stuff
is a bit out of my league.  I can troubleshoot it, but I have no idea how to
fix it.

 - Matt Bradford


- Original Message -
From: "Matthew Bradford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 11:12 AM
Subject: Re: Question about PCMCIA networking


> Unfortunately if I boot with everything removed from the system then it is
> just like me not having the card in normally.  When I put it in the card
> services daemon will pick it up right away.  If I don't have card services
> running then nothing works. :-P  Thanks for the idea though.
>
> - Matt Bradford
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "ABrady" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 2:47 AM
> Subject: Re: Question about PCMCIA networking
>
>
> > On Mon, 3 Jun 2002 01:34:48 -0400
> > "Matthew Bradford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > One more thing:
> > > I know the slot isn't bad because it was _just working_ with that
> > > card
> > > and I tried a modem in there and it worked fine.  Also I know the card
> > > is still good because it works fine in another laptop running
> > > Windows98.
> > >
> > >  - Matt Bradford
> >
> > You don't say, I'm not sure with a laptop, and this is a wild guess
> > based on things that work with desktops (sometimes).
> >
> > Have you rebooted without the card, removed all references to it
> > (/etc/modules.conf and networking) and rebooted with it installed? Being
> > an NE2K clone might require some manual configuration once again. I
> > don't use ISA boards any more, but I remember they required some
> > additional parameters to get them working (IRQ, I think it was, or IO,
> > but not both). I had a couple of NE2K clones that were ISA and needed
> > those things to work.
> >
> > That's my best (and only) shot.
> >
> > > - Original Message -
> > > From: "Matthew Bradford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:31 AM
> > > Subject: Question about PCMCIA networking
> > >
> > >
> > > > I am totally stumped.
> > > >
> > > > Here is the issue:  I am running an NEC Versa 5080/64mb RAM/3gb HD
> > > > and I just put a fresh install of RH7.3 on it.  Now here is where
> > > > issues come in...
> > > >
> > > > I have a SMC8040TX network card which is supposed to be NE2000
> > > > compliant. So it just automagically loads the pcnet_cs.o module.
> > > > The first time I inserted the card it worked wonderfully.  I got a
> > > > DHCP address and I could get to the net and bring up any page I
> > > > wanted to.  Then I made the mistake of turning my laptop off. :-/
> > > >
> > > > Now when I boot up (changing no settings) the card is detected and
> > > > the driver is loaded (known from hearing both beeps and doing an
> > > > lsmod) but it will not transmit anything over the network.  It is as
> > > > if it can only
> > > listen
> > > > to the traffic on the rest of the network but not participate.  I
> > > > can do
> > > an
> > > > 'ifconfig eth0 up' and it shows up in my card listing and then do a
> > > > 'tcpdump -i eth0' and it shows every single packet flowing through
> > > > the network.  If I try and hardwire an address to the card
> > > > ('ifconfig eth0 192.168.0.5 up') then it shows the IP address but I
> > > > cannot ping anything. This is very frustrating since it worked
> > > > perfectly the first time.
> > > >
> > > > To sum up: fresh install of RH7.3 NIC works perfectly.  Reboot and
> > > > it becomes a silent partner on the network.  Will not join in the
> > > > chatter anymore... even when I uninstall PCMCIA support and put it
> > > > back in.
> > > >
> > > > Any ideas?
> > > >  - Matt Bradford
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ___
> > > > Redhat-list mailing list
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ___
> > > Redhat-list mailing list
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> >
> >
> > --
> > Well, what was the ham cured OF?
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Redhat-list mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> >
>
>
>
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[E

RE: Linux-friendly MP3 player?

[Adam Ellis]

XMMS (www.wmms.org) is a great mp3 player.  If the laptop is tight on
resources you might also want to look at mpg123 (www.mpg123.org) with the
gqmpeg front-end (http://gqmpeg.sourceforge.net/).

AE

-Original Message-
From: Justin Ellison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 11:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Linux-friendly MP3 player?


Hi all,

Looking into freeing up some hard drive space on my laptop, and
thinking about getting an MP3 player.  What does everyone have, how do
you like it?  Windows is not an option - if it doesn't work in Linux,
I'm not getting it.

Justin

-- 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQA8hO+VBOGVGcv6DNwRAnATAJ41CA57cwrv71e3qhTzVFv2Pz6j0QCgonV7
TPZfyZ+m7eZX3oHeZ3YhT9E=
=fFbZ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Linux-friendly MP3 player?

[Matthew Bradford]

I think he's talkin about a hardware device MP3 player.  Like Apple's thing.
Although I don't know off hand which ones would work in Linux, I am sure you
could get a USB based one to work in later distros.

 - Matt Bradford

- Original Message -
From: "Timothy Lee Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 11:31 AM
Subject: Re: Linux-friendly MP3 player?


> I've read that  WinAmp has a Linux client also!
>
> But I'd prefer the use of good open-source software over something ported
> from Windows.
>
> Oh, and the KDE Media Player (notrn) plays MP3 files too.
>
>
>
> On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
>
> > Justin Ellison wrote:
> >
> > > Looking into freeing up some hard drive space on my laptop,
and
> > > thinking about getting an MP3 player.  What does everyone have, how do
> > > you like it?  Windows is not an option - if it doesn't work in Linux,
> >
> > Erm, XMMS ?
> >
> > --
> > W | I haven't lost my mind; it's backed up on tape somewhere.
> >   +
> >   Ashley M. Kirchner    .   303.442.6410 x130
> >   IT Director / SysAdmin / WebSmith . 800.441.3873 x130
> >   Photo Craft Laboratories, Inc.. 3550 Arapahoe Ave. #6
> >   http://www.pcraft.com . .  ..   Boulder, CO 80303, U.S.A.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Redhat-list mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> >
>
>
>
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: about chroot wu-ftpd; was->Re: Re: the port 41430?I was cracked :-(

[Chapman, Matt]

Or give vsftpd a try.  It is fast and more secure IMHO than wu-ftpd.
Pro-FTPD is good as well.

-matt chapman

-Original Message-
From: Lewi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 4:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: about chroot wu-ftpd; was->Re: Re: the port 41430?I was
cracked :-(


oh, ic
in what I'm thinking now it's clear now that running proftpd is better
than wu-ftpd because I see that proftpd ran as non-root user

thank you very much

On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 10:59:10PM +1000, Greg Wright wrote:
> 
> 
> *** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***
> 
> On 2/06/2002 at 1:18 PM Lewi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [gregausit/redhat-list] wrote:
> 
> >talking about wu-ftpd, I know that anonymous user in wuftpd release 
> >by red hat using chroot env, is this meant that, even I ran wu-ftpd 
> >in chroot, still can't protect your system.
> >
> >so what the chroot really used for??
> >I have read Securing Red Hat by Gerhard, in his book he still using
> >wu-ftpd in chroot environment
> >
> >need for explanation, please
> >I'm really confusing :(
> >
> 
> I setup wu years back to run users chrooted, I am not sure what is in 
> 7.3, but chrooting for wu is usually related to the user or group 
> being chrooted or jailed so they cannot leave a directory, it does not

> offer any protection from say a known buffer overload.
> 
> If the wu daemon is run as a non priveledged user and chrooted, then 
> this would be a setup that offers security for the system and not for 
> protection agains users browsing to a directory where they could read 
> your secret files
> 
> Hope that clarifies the basics or principle idea.
> 
> 
> 
> Regards
> 
> Greg Wright
> --
> 
> IT Consultant Sydney Australia PH 0418 292020 -- Int. +61 418
292020
> Available for Global Contracts  US Fax -- 801 740 2874
> Web  http://www.ausit.comE-mail Greg  AT  AusIT.com
> Trading As -   AAA Computers -- providers of IT services.
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

-- 
ichtus
--
Lewi Supranata .K
ICQ: 50643061
Homepage :  http://mercury7.petra.ac.id/~ichtus 
   ---> http://www.petra.ac.id:8080/~ichtus/ <---
GnuPG Public Key :  http://mercury7.petra.ac.id/~ichtus/ichtus-keys



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Linux-friendly MP3 player?

[Timothy Lee Young]

I've read that  WinAmp has a Linux client also!

But I'd prefer the use of good open-source software over something ported
from Windows.  

Oh, and the KDE Media Player (notrn) plays MP3 files too.



On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:

> Justin Ellison wrote:
> 
> > Looking into freeing up some hard drive space on my laptop, and
> > thinking about getting an MP3 player.  What does everyone have, how do
> > you like it?  Windows is not an option - if it doesn't work in Linux,
> 
> Erm, XMMS ?
> 
> --
> W | I haven't lost my mind; it's backed up on tape somewhere.
>   +
>   Ashley M. Kirchner    .   303.442.6410 x130
>   IT Director / SysAdmin / WebSmith . 800.441.3873 x130
>   Photo Craft Laboratories, Inc.. 3550 Arapahoe Ave. #6
>   http://www.pcraft.com . .  ..   Boulder, CO 80303, U.S.A.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> 



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Linux-friendly MP3 player?

[Ashley M. Kirchner]

Justin Ellison wrote:

> Looking into freeing up some hard drive space on my laptop, and
> thinking about getting an MP3 player.  What does everyone have, how do
> you like it?  Windows is not an option - if it doesn't work in Linux,

Erm, XMMS ?

--
W | I haven't lost my mind; it's backed up on tape somewhere.
  +
  Ashley M. Kirchner    .   303.442.6410 x130
  IT Director / SysAdmin / WebSmith . 800.441.3873 x130
  Photo Craft Laboratories, Inc.. 3550 Arapahoe Ave. #6
  http://www.pcraft.com . .  ..   Boulder, CO 80303, U.S.A.





___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Linux-friendly MP3 player?

[Justin Ellison]

Hi all,

Looking into freeing up some hard drive space on my laptop, and
thinking about getting an MP3 player.  What does everyone have, how do
you like it?  Windows is not an option - if it doesn't work in Linux,
I'm not getting it.

Justin

-- 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQA8hO+VBOGVGcv6DNwRAnATAJ41CA57cwrv71e3qhTzVFv2Pz6j0QCgonV7
TPZfyZ+m7eZX3oHeZ3YhT9E=
=fFbZ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: How come then that Wireless didn't become established ...

[Mike Burger]

I don't think the initial query had to do with T1 type, line of sight type 
transmission.  My impression was that he was asking about wireless 
ethernet, rather than cabling up a building/facility.

And from what I've priced, the equipment cost, alone, for the long 
distance (not that you get great distance), is fairly heavy.

On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Robert Canary wrote:

> No that is wrong.  I have been doing wireless Internet for about two
> years now.  It is cheaper on the clients and runs rock solid.  My links
> are priced per facilty based T1 tiering (ie 64k, 128k, etc.).  The
> reason you do not see more of it is because there is a line-of-sight
> issue.  This is because the wireless industry is oppressed by the FCC by
> refusing to give protection to it in its own spectrum.  The ROBCs do a
> good job of protecting their hardwired assets by lobbying the FCC and
> other communication regulators.
> 
> As far as bandwidth...I can get you anything from 64k upto 45Meg.  And
> the weather dose not change it.
> 
> 
> --
> robert canary
> system services
> OhioCounty.Net
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (270)298-9331 Office
> (270)298-7449 Fax
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> 



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Cross Platform VPN software

[Javier Gostling]

On Sun, 2002-06-02 at 23:19, Chad and Doria Skinner wrote:
> Does anyone know of a good cross platform VNC client and server? Also, I
> have been looking at freeS/WAN does anyone know of a free IPSEC client for
> windows that will work with it?

AFAIK, there is a document in the FreeS/WAN package with instructions on
Windows interoperability. Check their site.

Cheers,
-- 
Javier Gostling
Ingeniero de Sistemas
Virtualia S.A.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fono: +56 (2) 202-6264 x 130
Fax: +56 (2) 342-8763

Av. Kennedy 5757, of 1502
Las Condes
Santiago
Chile



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Question about PCMCIA networking

[Matthew Bradford]

Unfortunately if I boot with everything removed from the system then it is
just like me not having the card in normally.  When I put it in the card
services daemon will pick it up right away.  If I don't have card services
running then nothing works. :-P  Thanks for the idea though.

- Matt Bradford


- Original Message -
From: "ABrady" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 2:47 AM
Subject: Re: Question about PCMCIA networking


> On Mon, 3 Jun 2002 01:34:48 -0400
> "Matthew Bradford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > One more thing:
> > I know the slot isn't bad because it was _just working_ with that
> > card
> > and I tried a modem in there and it worked fine.  Also I know the card
> > is still good because it works fine in another laptop running
> > Windows98.
> >
> >  - Matt Bradford
>
> You don't say, I'm not sure with a laptop, and this is a wild guess
> based on things that work with desktops (sometimes).
>
> Have you rebooted without the card, removed all references to it
> (/etc/modules.conf and networking) and rebooted with it installed? Being
> an NE2K clone might require some manual configuration once again. I
> don't use ISA boards any more, but I remember they required some
> additional parameters to get them working (IRQ, I think it was, or IO,
> but not both). I had a couple of NE2K clones that were ISA and needed
> those things to work.
>
> That's my best (and only) shot.
>
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Matthew Bradford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:31 AM
> > Subject: Question about PCMCIA networking
> >
> >
> > > I am totally stumped.
> > >
> > > Here is the issue:  I am running an NEC Versa 5080/64mb RAM/3gb HD
> > > and I just put a fresh install of RH7.3 on it.  Now here is where
> > > issues come in...
> > >
> > > I have a SMC8040TX network card which is supposed to be NE2000
> > > compliant. So it just automagically loads the pcnet_cs.o module.
> > > The first time I inserted the card it worked wonderfully.  I got a
> > > DHCP address and I could get to the net and bring up any page I
> > > wanted to.  Then I made the mistake of turning my laptop off. :-/
> > >
> > > Now when I boot up (changing no settings) the card is detected and
> > > the driver is loaded (known from hearing both beeps and doing an
> > > lsmod) but it will not transmit anything over the network.  It is as
> > > if it can only
> > listen
> > > to the traffic on the rest of the network but not participate.  I
> > > can do
> > an
> > > 'ifconfig eth0 up' and it shows up in my card listing and then do a
> > > 'tcpdump -i eth0' and it shows every single packet flowing through
> > > the network.  If I try and hardwire an address to the card
> > > ('ifconfig eth0 192.168.0.5 up') then it shows the IP address but I
> > > cannot ping anything. This is very frustrating since it worked
> > > perfectly the first time.
> > >
> > > To sum up: fresh install of RH7.3 NIC works perfectly.  Reboot and
> > > it becomes a silent partner on the network.  Will not join in the
> > > chatter anymore... even when I uninstall PCMCIA support and put it
> > > back in.
> > >
> > > Any ideas?
> > >  - Matt Bradford
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ___
> > > Redhat-list mailing list
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Redhat-list mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
>
> --
> Well, what was the ham cured OF?
>
>
>
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Cyber Cafe software

[Steve Buehler]

Does anybody know of any software all ready written or what would have to 
be done, to allow us to run a cyber cafe style setup.  What we need the 
software to do is to allow someone to come in and plug in their computer to 
our network (actually a customers network).  They want the following:
1.  A customer comes in and signs up starting a clock so they could charge 
the customer for the time.
2.  They want it to work for wired or wireless networks.  So when they sign 
in, it would either have to set their IP address on their machine 
automatically, or we would have to give them an IP address to put in to 
their system.
3.  It would have to send a report once a day to an email address (or 
multiple email addresses) with the days summary of time used and amount of 
money made.
4.  A regular customer could come in and use the same login each time so 
that they could track everything over long periods of time, on a per 
customer basis.  They might want to give discounts to these people and/or 
give away free stuff.  Kind of likefor every minute someone has been 
on, they get one credit point.  Those credit points can be used for 
purchasing extra time, or other products in the business.  Now, if it is 
kept in a mysql database, than that would not be hard to pull.

I know that there are cyber cafe's out there now, so I am assuming that I 
should not have to reinvent the wheel for this software.  If not, how would 
somebody go about setting this up.  Basically, if I could get it set up so 
that ALL IP addresses on the local network are not allowed in unless they 
sign in first, than what file would it have to put that IP address in and 
what would have to be restarted to allow that customer access?  Preferably, 
I would like the program to work with RedHat Linux, PHP and MySQL.

Thanks In Advance
Steve Buehler



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Question about PCMCIA networking

[Matthew Bradford]

Ok, the card is on IRQ3 (not sure how that got past the default filters...
but oh well.)  So I went into BIOS and simply disabled COM2 (aka IR port).
Still the same issue.  Here are a couple lines from tcpdump on both
machines:

server:
10:34:41.651859 arp who-has 192.168.0.5 tell my.host.machine
10:34:41.651859 arp reply 192.168.0.5 is-at 0:e0:98:88:3a:2b

workstation:
10:35:26.651859 arp who-has 192.168.0.5 tell 192.168.0.1
10:35:26.651859 arp reply 192.168.0.5 is-at 0:e0:98:88:3a:2b

This happens when I set the trouble system up with an IP of 192.168.0.5 and
ping it from the server.

Can I ping a mac address?  Anyway, my original theory was that nothing was
getting to the server... but as you can see, the arp reply is definately
getting to both.  There is no longer a potential for IRQ conflicts (anything
that would want to use IRQ3 is disabled) and I don't think the driver would
only work sometimes.. but not others.  Perhaps I am wrong... I don't know.
Oh, and I have switched sockets (many times) and lsmod and route -n produce
exactly the same results when hardwired.  (Obviously things would change a
little when it acutally gets its address from DHCP)

HELP! :-P
 - Matt Bradford


- Original Message -
From: "David Talkington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 2:41 AM
Subject: Re: Question about PCMCIA networking


> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Matthew Bradford wrote:
>
> >Now when I boot up (changing no settings) the card is detected and the
> >driver is loaded (known from hearing both beeps and doing an lsmod) but
it
> >will not transmit anything over the network.  It is as if it can only
listen
>
> I haven't seen this for a long time, but based on my experience with
> this kind of thing, I'd put my money on a driver problem or conflict.
> I'd investigate the contents of /etc/pcmcia/config.opts, and exclude
> resources that you might be sharing with other devices; /proc/interrupts
> might give you some clues.  And try the other slot, too.
>
> The outputs of `lsmod' and `route -n', when the card is working vs. when
> it isn't, might be interesting as well.
>
> - -d
>
> - --
> David Talkington
>




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

How to use "gid" permission

[Massimo Alonzo]

Hi,

I tried to give my user the permission of writing on a vfat partition
(applying gid) but I think I made a mess .. and obviously it doesn't
work.


Can you explain me, in details,  howto? 


This is my configuration:

user name is: host_user
shared vfat: /dev/hda2



What book,or guide or tutorial,  can I read to find infos related to
system administration?

Thanks for your help

Massimo



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

kernel: Cannot find map file

[LuisMi]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

What is this?
Jun  3 12:23:28 echelon kernel: Cannot find map file.

- -- 
Luis Miguel Cruz.  

PGP KEY: 0x3AC52657   |   [ADPSOFT] http://www.adpsoft.com
  |  "Connecting your business"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAjz7bUoACgkQvQHLTzrFJlelmgCgmeRr6a6gz35rPuDv4O+qzAWR
+30AnRipbia4omnA7hrZQl8RXSempXzf
=AyWh
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Logs in tty12

[Tony Nugent]

On Sat Jun 01 2002 at 02:40, "Josep M." wrote:

> Hello!
> 
> Is possible see all logs in tty12 ? I read this,but not how to do this!
> 
> Thanks
> Josep

Trivial.  Add the following to /etc/syslog.conf:

*.* /dev/tty12

then reload or restart syslog.  (Keep your previous entries for
/var/log/messages etc, syslogd can log to more than one
destination).

However, that is a bit too verbose and full of cluttter.  I would
recommend something like the following...

*.*;mail.none;kern.none;authpriv.none;cron.none /dev/tty12
kern.*  /dev/tty11
mail.*  /dev/tty10

That separates out kernel and mail logs onto their own screens.

  If you don't want to use tty10 or tty11, then use tty13 and tty12 -
  but you can't get to it directly with an F-key (unless shift-alt-F1
  is set up to works for tty13 etc).

Cheers
Tony



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Snort vs. other

[Chris Rondthaler]

Hello gentleman:

We are in need to securing our portion of the network and I have been given
this project. I'm seeing this as an opportunity to pull Linux into the
environment, and so my question is: 

At the hands of a skilled administrator, is not Snort as good as any of
these other high priced software IDS systems? (That is: minus the bells and
whistles.)

Obviously we are price aware; but I must be able to guarantee a certain
level of security.

Thank you so much, in advance, for your expert advice! 


Chris Rondthaler
MIS Director
TV Guide Inc. ("Trackside Live" Unit)

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: email
__
"Production is the basis of moral." - MK




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

reduce noise in MP3's file

[Marcelo Rodriguez Revello]

Hi!
You post this question:
"Any one know of any software that will help clean up the noise in mp3's?
I've
seen it for windows but can't find anything for linux."

Can you tell me the name of the software for windows to clean up the noise
in mp3's?

Thank you

Regards

A/C Marcelo Rodriguez




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: How come then that Wireless didn't become established ...

[Robert Canary]

No that is wrong.  I have been doing wireless Internet for about two
years now.  It is cheaper on the clients and runs rock solid.  My links
are priced per facilty based T1 tiering (ie 64k, 128k, etc.).  The
reason you do not see more of it is because there is a line-of-sight
issue.  This is because the wireless industry is oppressed by the FCC by
refusing to give protection to it in its own spectrum.  The ROBCs do a
good job of protecting their hardwired assets by lobbying the FCC and
other communication regulators.

As far as bandwidth...I can get you anything from 64k upto 45Meg.  And
the weather dose not change it.


--
robert canary
system services
OhioCounty.Net
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(270)298-9331 Office
(270)298-7449 Fax



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: How come then that Wireless didn't become established ...

[Pranay Kumar]

Correct me if I am wrong but how about “Bandwidth
& reliability”? As far as I can see… wired technologies offer
greater bandwidth and reliability than their wireless counterparts.

 

- Pranay

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Shyam Kumar Mankayil
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 7:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: How come then that
Wireless didn't become established ...

 

I know this may not be a very bright question 


I guess you can transmit over greater distances using
a Wireless setup , ie :

radio frequencies , than a wired setup .

Why then are we not sitting in an
exclusively wireless world(Internet and all ) ?

Regards,

Shyam 

 







Sign
up to watch the FIFA World Cup video highlights from your desk!

http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com/fc/en

RE: Cross Platform VPN software

[Chad and Doria Skinner]

Don't type late in the evening...What I meant to write was "Doea anyone know
of a good cross platform VPN client and server"?

> Does anyone know of a good cross platform VNC client and server?



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

How come then that Wireless didn't become established ...

[Shyam Kumar Mankayil]

I know this may not be a very bright question  
I guess you can transmit over greater distances using a Wireless setup , ie :
radio frequencies , than a wired setup .
Why then are we not sitting in an exclusively wireless world(Internet and all ) ?
Regards,
Shyam Sign up to watch the FIFA World Cup video highlights from your desk!

http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com/fc/en

Rhosts file

[Danny Sternkopf]

Hi all,

I am running RedHat Linux 7.2 on my boxes and I have some troubles with the user's
.rhosts file. I want to allow the login procedure via rsh and rlogin directly without 
password
for serveral users and for serveral computers. 

So I specified in my .rhosts file the metacharacter '+', but it didn't work. It seems 
that the
sign is ignored.

Normal entries like " " work fine.

I tried the following three possibilities ...

" +"
"+  "
"+  +"

... without success.


Any suggestions? Maybe pam is the reason?

Thank you in advance!

Best Regards,

Danny Sternkopf



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: about chroot wu-ftpd; was->Re: Re: the port 41430?I was cracked :-(

[Lewi]

oh, ic
in what I'm thinking now it's clear now that running proftpd is better than wu-ftpd
because I see that proftpd ran as non-root user

thank you very much

On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 10:59:10PM +1000, Greg Wright wrote:
> 
> 
> *** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***
> 
> On 2/06/2002 at 1:18 PM Lewi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [gregausit/redhat-list] wrote:
> 
> >talking about wu-ftpd, I know that anonymous user in wuftpd release by
> >red hat using chroot env,
> >is this meant that, even I ran wu-ftpd in chroot, still can't protect your
> >system.
> >
> >so what the chroot really used for?? 
> >I have read Securing Red Hat by Gerhard, in his book he still using
> >wu-ftpd in chroot environment
> >
> >need for explanation, please
> >I'm really confusing :(
> >
> 
> I setup wu years back to run users chrooted, I am not sure what is in 7.3,
> but chrooting for wu is usually related to the user or group being chrooted
> or jailed so they cannot leave a directory, it does not offer any
> protection from say a known buffer overload.
> 
> If the wu daemon is run as a non priveledged user and chrooted, then this
> would be a setup that offers security for the system and not for protection
> agains users browsing to a directory where they could read your secret
> files
> 
> Hope that clarifies the basics or principle idea.
> 
> 
> 
> Regards
> 
> Greg Wright
> -- 
> 
> IT Consultant Sydney Australia PH 0418 292020 -- Int. +61 418 292020
> Available for Global Contracts  US Fax -- 801 740 2874
> Web  http://www.ausit.comE-mail Greg  AT  AusIT.com
> Trading As -   AAA Computers -- providers of IT services.
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

-- 
ichtus
--
Lewi Supranata .K
ICQ: 50643061
Homepage :  http://mercury7.petra.ac.id/~ichtus 
   ---> http://www.petra.ac.id:8080/~ichtus/ <---
GnuPG Public Key :  http://mercury7.petra.ac.id/~ichtus/ichtus-keys



msg79976/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

access to Netware ldap not working?

[Willem van der Walt<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]

Has anyone succeded in making squid do ldap authentication using an
ldap server running on Netware? I have the squid_auth_ldap utility, but
do not get anywhere with it.It does not find the user on novell.
I think the problem is on the novell side, but I do not know enough about
Netware to correct it.
tia
willem


-- 
Willem van der Walt
Information Services Directorate
Department of Health
South Africa
tel: 27 12 3120700




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list