RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Micor Mobile TLD8262B10 Exciter Question

2009-03-16 Thread Mike Besemer (WM4B)
Trash?  What the heck is ‘trash’?

 

de WM4B

 

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of n4...@aol.com
Sent: Sunday, March 15, 2009 11:38 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Micor Mobile TLD8262B10 Exciter Question

 

Mike,
Don't pitch em in the trash, I'll take em.
Collin

-Original Message-
From: Mike Besemer (WM4B) mwbese...@cox.net mailto:mwbesemer%40cox.net 
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 10:35 pm
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Micor Mobile TLD8262B10 Exciter 
Question

Guys,

 

As I said in my previous post, I DID that.  No joy. 

 

Mike

WM4B

 

--

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com  
[mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Don Kupferschmidt
Sent: Sunday, March 15, 2009 10:33 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com 
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Micor Mobile TLD8262B10 Exciter 
Question

 

Mike,

Take the advise that Skipp has given you.

In one project I didn't heed the advise of others to preset the coils 
from
the service manual and I was pulling my hair out for days trying to 
figure
out why the exciter wouldn't tune up properly.

Do like he says . . . . reset everything back to the chart indicated 
height
position. Then use the manual to tune up the exciter. Trust me, (and
others), the exciter *will* tune up properly UNLESS you have something 
else
going on.

73,

Don, KD9PT

- Original Message -
From: skipp025 skipp...@yahoo.com mailto:skipp025%40yahoo.com 
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Sunday, March2015, 2009 8:57 PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Micor Mobile TLD8262B10 Exciter Question


 Based on my experience with radios like the Micor Mobile with
 the tx band-pass filter and the MSR-2000 exciter... the best
 way to tune up these units is to find the coil preset information
 in the Service Manual and start with reseting those items back
 to the chart indicated height position.

 Sure you can adjust some coils when moving the exciter small
 distances from the last operating frequency. But some coils
 are not simple peak or dip adjustments. They interact with the
 previous or trailing coil adjustments and should be adjusted
 per the manual only... re-tweaks just don't do it.

 In the process of tuning the exciter and related filters you'll
 sometimes see only slight meter movements as you step up through
 the chain/process. One stage adjustment of the MSR-2000 is really
 hard to see initial meter movement.

 A re-tweak of the exciter won't always show the mentioned small
 meter movements and it's sometimes very easy to adjust a stage
 to a wrong peak/dip.

 So start from scratch most every time. Be sure to use the coil
 position chart information provided in the manual or your results
 will surely vary.

 cheers,
 s.

 Mike Besemer \(WM4B\) mwbese...@... wrote:

 Not lookin' good for the home-team. I've got some reading at the 
meter
 plug
 pin
3, but L403 doesn't effect it at all. No indication at meter 
plug 4
 at
 all. Guess I need to troubleshoot or scare up another exciter. Good
 thing
 this is a long-term project!



 73,



 Mike

 WM4B



 From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
 mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com 
 [mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
 mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Eric Lemmon
 Sent: Sunday, March 15, 2009 4:46 PM
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
 mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com 
 Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Micor Mobile TLD8262B10 Exciter 
Question



 Mike,

 Probably. The fact that you could receive the signal suggests that 
the
 exciter is working, but just has a very low output. Tuning should 
fix
 that.
 Most commercial-band VHF exciters will tune to 2m without 
modification,
 but
 that is not always the case.

 73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY

 -Original Message-
 From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
 mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com 
 mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
 [mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
 mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com 
 mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Mike 
Besemer
 (WM4B)
 Sent: Sunday, March 15, 2009 1:30 PM
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
 mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com 
 mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
 Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Micor Mobile TLD8262B10 Exciter 
Question

 Eric,

 Got that. thanks. But the exciter is okay as-is (except for tuning), 
is
 that correct?

 Mike

 
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com 
 mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
 

[Repeater-Builder] Re: Repeater Kerchunk

2009-03-16 Thread wa5luy
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, retiredcss01 tommy...@... wrote:

 We have some on our repeater frequency, that just like to kerchunk the 
 repeater to hear it come back or ID. Is there any way we can eliminate this 
 annoying situation?  I suspect that we may have an unlicensed individual with 
 a 2meter radio.
 
 Thanks


As someone already said it's not always a person kerchunking. I thought we had 
a kerchunker until I watched a spectrum analyzer tied to the repeater antenna. 
It turned out to be a little birdie traveling down the band every time a 
hospital pager was keyed after being off for a while and cooling down. It just 
happened they were using the same PL as our repeater.
Funny thing, Captain Moto took that exciter and put it at another location 
across town with a different PL. It took another ham repeater group several 
years to figure out why the kerchunker had moved to their frequency.

73 And good luck 

Wayne




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater Kerchunk

2009-03-16 Thread Joe
If you start to worry about the kerchunkers your going to drive yourself 
crazy.  I've had several repeaters for years and have learned that the 
kerchunkers are usually someone who has just discovered your repeater 
and want to know how it covers an area.  They'll drive around testing it 
in many areas.  It usually goes away after a few days when they finish 
their testing.  Other people just kerchunck the repeater to see if it's 
on the air, or that their radio is still working. 

As a repeater owner, you have to deal with many types of people and 
personalities.  If you show that you are getting annoyed, the 
kerchunking can get worse.  Many repeaters in my area have had problems 
with users, I haven't.  The problem people usually go to a repeater 
where they get attention.  I ignore them.

73, Joe, K1ike

retiredcss01 wrote:
 We have some on our repeater frequency, that just like to kerchunk the 
 repeater to hear it come back or ID. Is there any way we can eliminate this 
 annoying situation?  I suspect that we may have an unlicensed individual with 
 a 2meter radio.

 Thanks
   



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater Kerchunk

2009-03-16 Thread Radio Guy
I agree with all the comments. What I do is listen to the signal,
usually there is a distinctive sound from the mike being squeezed or
noise on the signal, I'm almost certain who my kerchunker is, as he
has used my repeater before!



On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 8:13 AM, Joe k1ike_m...@snet.net wrote:
 If you start to worry about the kerchunkers your going to drive yourself
 crazy. I've had several repeaters for years and have learned that the
 kerchunkers are usually someone who has just discovered your repeater
 and want to know how it covers an area. They'll drive around testing it
 in many areas. It usually goes away after a few days when they finish
 their testing. Other people just kerchunck the repeater to see if it's
 on the air, or that their radio is still working.

 As a repeater owner, you have to deal with many types of people and
 personalities. If you show that you are getting annoyed, the
 kerchunking can get worse. Many repeaters in my area have had problems
 with users, I haven't. The problem people usually go to a repeater
 where they get attention. I ignore them.

 73, Joe, K1ike


---
Ken


RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: 220 Repeater Power Amp

2009-03-16 Thread Jeff DePolo

I second Skipp's motion, having been burned by Henry twice before, UHF amps
delivered without a low pass filter, second harmonic about -40 dBc in the
cell band...

Also, TPL manufactures 220 amps (I had one, Adam N2ACF has it now),
primarily for overseas markets.  They use the same devices as in their UHF
amps (MRF646's and MRF648's primarily).  You'll probably have to call to
find out availability in the US.

--- Jeff

 Make sure you ask (at the time of the order) if the Amateur 
 Band Amplifier you're buying includes the same type low pass 
 filter supplied with the commercial RF deck. There's a historical 
 reason why I make this comment... 
 s. 
 
 repeat...@... repeat...@... wrote:
  Henry Radio also makes 220 amplifiers. 1-800-877-7979 also 
  give amateur discounts. 
  Paul AA3VI
 
 
 
 
 
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
 Version: 8.0.237 / Virus Database: 270.11.3/1970 - Release 
 Date: 03/15/09 14:07:00
 
 
 



[Repeater-Builder] MSR 2000 DC Transfer Question

2009-03-16 Thread wa5luy
Does anyone have a schematic for a TRN 5256A DC Transfer Module. I would like 
to remove this board from the backplane if possible for a new repeater I am 
building.

Thank You  



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: 220 Repeater Power Amp

2009-03-16 Thread Adam Feuer
I wouldn't waste any time or money on Henry or TE Systems repeater 
amplifiers.  On my 220 repeater, I had the Henry and it was the biggest 
POS I had ever seen. The workmanship with regard to the soldering of 
components was terrible. I've used one on my 440 machine and it was worse!

I have been using the TPL that I received from Jeff without any issues, 
keyed down for hours.  Just looking at the PA board in the TPL versus 
the Henry is enough to tell you why the Henrys fail.

Spend the extra money once, it will be well worth it.

Adam N2ACF

Jeff DePolo wrote:
 I second Skipp's motion, having been burned by Henry twice before, UHF amps
 delivered without a low pass filter, second harmonic about -40 dBc in the
 cell band...

 Also, TPL manufactures 220 amps (I had one, Adam N2ACF has it now),
 primarily for overseas markets.  They use the same devices as in their UHF
 amps (MRF646's and MRF648's primarily).  You'll probably have to call to
 find out availability in the US.

   --- Jeff

   
 Make sure you ask (at the time of the order) if the Amateur 
 Band Amplifier you're buying includes the same type low pass 
 filter supplied with the commercial RF deck. There's a historical 
 reason why I make this comment... 
 s. 

 
 repeat...@... repeat...@... wrote:
 Henry Radio also makes 220 amplifiers. 1-800-877-7979 also 
 give amateur discounts. 
 Paul AA3VI
   



 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
 Version: 8.0.237 / Virus Database: 270.11.3/1970 - Release 
 Date: 03/15/09 14:07:00



 



 



 Yahoo! Groups Links




   



[Repeater-Builder] Re: Repeater Kerchunk

2009-03-16 Thread Geert Jan de Groot
 We have some on our repeater frequency, that just like to kerchunk 
 the repeater to hear it come back or ID. Is there any way we can 
 eliminate this annoying situation?  I suspect that we may have 
 an unlicensed individual with a 2meter radio.

This actually isn't technology, it's psychology.
Consider this:

A guy, either licensed or unlicensed, got himself a radio but doesn't
have lots of reasons to get active, either because he does't know
the crowd, is new, perhaps not licensed (yet!) or just because he
wants to test access to the repeater. You and I, each with more than
20 years of experience, know what to expect; for someone new,
this is cause of concern and something to explore.

Asking for a report may be difficult - perhaps because he doesn't know
the group of people that all seem to know eachother for years,
perhaps he looks up to the user community, perhaps the license thing
sits in the way.

The easiest way to get what he wants, is just to kerchunk the repeater.
So that's what he does.

There are 4 things to do:
1. Make the kerchunk event as non-disruptive as possible.
   Make sure the repeater's response is there, but as non-intrusive
   as possible. My machines just have a 500 ms hangtime;
   if people kerchunk, they just hear the plop when they unkey,
   know that the repeater still works, and be done with it.
   Certainly, no roger beeps, bloops, ID's or significant hangtime.
   Just enough response to allow for testing and be done with it.
   (Dutch regulations allow me to periodically ID; hence, I don't
   need to make this dependent on user activity and, as you'd guessed,
   the ID thing is completely independent of activity, be it kerchunkers
   or regular users).
2. Believe it or not, make kerchunking easy. One of the machines I manage,
   used to have a speech detector. Kerchunkers, instead of quietly
   keying the microphone, were supposed to ID. 
   They were supposed to, but what happened was that people would whistle,
   rub the grill of the microphone or do something else to circumvent
   the speech detector. When the machine got renovated, I removed this
   misfeature, allowing just plain carrier, and the user community
   picked it up quickly, supposedly because the other machines work
   like this.
   Again: kerchunking is going to happen. Make it easy, minimize it's impact,
   and make it a non-event and be done with it.
3. Don't talk about abuse issues. Never, ever, mention the kerchunker.
   This, and the rationale behind it, should be known to members of 
   this group; check the abuse files for the reasons behind it. 
4. Create a friendly, inviting environment where newcomers feel themselves
   welcome. With luck, the kerchunker(s) will join the community
   and become a valuable addition to your user group.
   I know this has happened several times on my machines, and I do consider
   this a feature.

73,

Geert Jan PE1HZG
janitor, PI3EHV, PI2EHV, PI6EHN, PI8EHV




[Repeater-Builder] Radio Interfacing to Dictaphone

2009-03-16 Thread Thomas Oliver
Trying to interface both transmit and receive audio from a base radio to a 
Dictaphone so both sides of the conversation are recorded, the radio is a CDM 
1250 Mobile.

My thoughts are I need some type of line level mixer with 2inputs for the radio 
side and 1 out to the Dictaphone.  What are you using?


tom


(\__/) ... 
(='.'=) 
()_()

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Repeater Kerchunk

2009-03-16 Thread Gordon 'Yeti'
I agree with this - example being that there's a repeater that's fairly 
distant to me (easily managable from the house, but quite difficult from 
a car until I'm about 10 miles closer to it than I am at home). There's 
also 2 repeaters that are really distant and can vary depending on 
conditions.

All 3 of these repeaters operate as mentioned here  - If I key up and 
let go, there's a tiny bit of carrier as I unkey. If the carrier's too 
badly broken, I don't give my call, as it wouldn't make it in anyway and 
would just be plain annoying.

One of these repeaters needs a fairly long over before it actually opens 
fully and IDs itself. New users (including myself at one point) find 
this annoying, thinking that it's not working. I still forget 
occasionally to length my call by giving it in phonetics, and have to 
re-do it to make it long enough to open the repeater.

The local UHF repeater opens fully at any 1750Hz tone or CTCSS on the 
input, which means someone kerchunking it, or not making it in fully, 
results in 10-15 seconds silent carrier and the full ID every time (It's 
nearly 2KHz off frequency too, but that's just it's age!).

By comparison, the last repeater round here to not have CTCSS is a 
complete pig to open - deliberate or otherwise - and this results in 
virtually zero use.

Geert Jan de Groot wrote:

  We have some on our repeater frequency, that just like to kerchunk
  the repeater to hear it come back or ID. Is there any way we can
  eliminate this annoying situation? I suspect that we may have
  an unlicensed individual with a 2meter radio.

 This actually isn't technology, it's psychology.
 Consider this:

 A guy, either licensed or unlicensed, got himself a radio but doesn't
 have lots of reasons to get active, either because he does't know
 the crowd, is new, perhaps not licensed (yet!) or just because he
 wants to test access to the repeater. You and I, each with more than
 20 years of experience, know what to expect; for someone new,
 this is cause of concern and something to explore.

 Asking for a report may be difficult - perhaps because he doesn't know
 the group of people that all seem to know eachother for years,
 perhaps he looks up to the user community, perhaps the license thing
 sits in the way.

 The easiest way to get what he wants, is just to kerchunk the repeater.
 So that's what he does.

 There are 4 things to do:
 1. Make the kerchunk event as non-disruptive as possible.
 Make sure the repeater's response is there, but as non-intrusive
 as possible. My machines just have a 500 ms hangtime;
 if people kerchunk, they just hear the plop when they unkey,
 know that the repeater still works, and be done with it.
 Certainly, no roger beeps, bloops, ID's or significant hangtime.
 Just enough response to allow for testing and be done with it.
 (Dutch regulations allow me to periodically ID; hence, I don't
 need to make this dependent on user activity and, as you'd guessed,
 the ID thing is completely independent of activity, be it kerchunkers
 or regular users).
 2. Believe it or not, make kerchunking easy. One of the machines I manage,
 used to have a speech detector. Kerchunkers, instead of quietly
 keying the microphone, were supposed to ID.
 They were supposed to, but what happened was that people would whistle,
 rub the grill of the microphone or do something else to circumvent
 the speech detector. When the machine got renovated, I removed this
 misfeature, allowing just plain carrier, and the user community
 picked it up quickly, supposedly because the other machines work
 like this.
 Again: kerchunking is going to happen. Make it easy, minimize it's impact,
 and make it a non-event and be done with it.
 3. Don't talk about abuse issues. Never, ever, mention the kerchunker.
 This, and the rationale behind it, should be known to members of
 this group; check the abuse files for the reasons behind it.
 4. Create a friendly, inviting environment where newcomers feel themselves
 welcome. With luck, the kerchunker(s) will join the community
 and become a valuable addition to your user group.
 I know this has happened several times on my machines, and I do consider
 this a feature.

 73,

 Geert Jan PE1HZG
 janitor, PI3EHV, PI2EHV, PI6EHN, PI8EHV

 
 


 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
 Version: 8.0.237 / Virus Database: 270.11.15/2003 - Release Date: 03/15/09 
 14:07:00

   



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater Kerchunk

2009-03-16 Thread Dave Gomberg
At 05:13 3/16/2009, Joe wrote:

If you start to worry about the kerchunkers your going to drive yourself
crazy.  I've had several repeaters for years and have learned that the
kerchunkers are usually someone who has just discovered your repeater
and want to know how it covers an area.

I admit that on occasion I have thought of kerchunking because I 
check into several nets where I am at the limit of the repeater's 
coverage.   I would kerchunk to see if I am in range or need to move 
a bit.  I am attempting to take as little resource as 
possible.   Would it be better for me to give my call, hope someone 
comes back, and ask for a signal report?



-- 
Dave Gomberg, San Francisco   NE5EE gomberg1 at wcf dot com
All addresses, phones, etc. at http://www.wcf.com/ham/info.html
- 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater Kerchunk

2009-03-16 Thread whensley11


My thoughts would be... let it be.  Do NOT let anybody know it may bother you.  
If they know it bothers you, they will keep doing it. 



As a long time ham I do kerchunk repeaters, especially my local one.  Why? 



To check the status and cycle of the I.D. 



If the repeater has been inactive for a while, when it first transmits it sends 
its I.D.  Since I don't want to be 'washed out' by the I.D., I kerchunk the 
repeater.  Once the I.D. has finished, or the I.D. has not been sent, I will 
then put out my call to see if anybody's on the air. 



On the road, traveling... I will kerchunk a repeater to see if I can reach it. 



There's also the other side of the coin to this.  You think kerchunking is 
bothersome?  How bothersome is it to be mobile, you bring up a repeater, and 
you try to use it.  You try several times putting your call out there.  Several 
miles later, several attempts later, you discover your audio wasn't getting 
through.  The repeater's ears weren't as good as its mouth. 



Give me kerchunking any day over that. 



73, 



Kim - WG8S

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater Kerchunk

2009-03-16 Thread Joe
Legally, you should be identifying by giving your call.  But, that is 
inviting a conversation with whoever hears you.  One of the repeaters 
here has a ham who hangs around constantly.  Sometimes I chose not to 
talk to him, but just want to check and see if the repeater is on the 
air and OK.  (I help maintain the repeater).  Yes, I am guilty of 
illegal kerchunking.

An antikerchunk filter that shortens the repeater tail time can make 
things worse.  The kerchunker does not hear the tail come back to 
him/her, so they keep on trying.  All the other users hear many short 
bursts of carrier.  Much more annoying than a single kerchunk.

I actually like to hear kerchuncks.  That means that there are users out 
there tuned to my repeaters.  With so much dead air time on repeaters 
lately, it's nice to know there is someone home out there.  When I 
hear a kerchunker I will usually key up and sign my call to see if they 
want to talk or get a signal report.  Sometimes (alot) they don't come 
back to me.  Maybe I too am one of those repeater trolls that no one 
wants to talk too!  Oh well, such is life, I never built repeaters to 
win a popularity contest.

73, Joe, K1ike

Dave Gomberg wrote:

 I admit that on occasion I have thought of kerchunking because I 
 check into several nets where I am at the limit of the repeater's 
 coverage.   I would kerchunk to see if I am in range or need to move 
 a bit.  I am attempting to take as little resource as 
 possible.   Would it be better for me to give my call, hope someone 
 comes back, and ask for a signal report?



   



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater Kerchunk

2009-03-16 Thread AJ
Anyone listened to the latest Gordon West, WB6NOA audio CDs for the tech
class license?

Happened to sit it on a tech licensing class a couple months ago...

If I recall correctly, the verbiage he (WB6NOA) used while demonstrating
repeaters was first, we'll key it up to see if it's on...

I'll have to grab that particular CD and listen to it over again - the 90+
minutes on just repeater operation tends to make me glaze over...

If Gordo is teaching that kerchunking is OK :)

And from a legal standpoint, 97.119(a) states ... at the end of each
communication, and at least every ten minutes during a communication
While a communication is not clearly defined in 97.3(a), it could be
surmised that it would be in the course of a conversation in which two
Amateurs exchange information for as long as the communication continues
until that communication comes to a close.

Reading very loosely between the lines, if one kerchunks the repeater 7
minutes before a net starts, and subsequently properly identifies during the
net check in prior to the elapsed 10 minutes, they *could* be fulfilling the
identification requirements set forth in 97.119(a).

HOWEVER...

It is likely not good amateur practice or etiquette to do so. On the flip
side of it, I'm not going to send a FSD-213 for someone that occasionally
kerchunks the repeater prior to making a contact or verifying their radio is
programmed correctly. I will, however, continue to treat malicious
interference as a prohibited act as defined (loosely) in 97.101(d).


73s,

AJ, K6LOR/R

On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 8:39 AM, Joe k1ike_m...@snet.net wrote:

   Legally, you should be identifying by giving your call. But, that is
 inviting a conversation with whoever hears you. One of the repeaters
 here has a ham who hangs around constantly. Sometimes I chose not to
 talk to him, but just want to check and see if the repeater is on the
 air and OK. (I help maintain the repeater). Yes, I am guilty of
 illegal kerchunking.

 An antikerchunk filter that shortens the repeater tail time can make
 things worse. The kerchunker does not hear the tail come back to
 him/her, so they keep on trying. All the other users hear many short
 bursts of carrier. Much more annoying than a single kerchunk.

 I actually like to hear kerchuncks. That means that there are users out
 there tuned to my repeaters. With so much dead air time on repeaters
 lately, it's nice to know there is someone home out there. When I
 hear a kerchunker I will usually key up and sign my call to see if they
 want to talk or get a signal report. Sometimes (alot) they don't come
 back to me. Maybe I too am one of those repeater trolls that no one
 wants to talk too! Oh well, such is life, I never built repeaters to
 win a popularity contest.

 73, Joe, K1ike


 Dave Gomberg wrote:
 
  I admit that on occasion I have thought of kerchunking because I
  check into several nets where I am at the limit of the repeater's
  coverage. I would kerchunk to see if I am in range or need to move
  a bit. I am attempting to take as little resource as
  possible. Would it be better for me to give my call, hope someone
  comes back, and ask for a signal report?
 
 
 
 

  



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater Kerchunk

2009-03-16 Thread Mike Naruta AA8K

When I make a transmission on a repeater that
hasn't been used for a while, I state my intent
and call sign, and the repeater ids after I let
go of the PTT.  I have made a legal transmission,
I gain the information that the repeater has
been dormant, AND I know that my transmission
held the COR/CTCSS for the entire duration of my
transmission.  That tells me more that just
hearing the hang time of a maybe partial
reception of my signal.


New hams learn by the example of existing hams.
If you are making unidentified transmissions,
they will make unidentified transmissions.



whensle...@comcast.net wrote:
 
 
 My thoughts would be... let it be.  Do NOT let anybody know it may 
 bother you.  If they know it bothers you, they will keep doing it.
 
  
 
 As a long time ham I do kerchunk repeaters, especially my local one.  Why?
 
  
 
 To check the status and cycle of the I.D.
 
  
 
 If the repeater has been inactive for a while, when it first transmits 
 it sends its I.D.  Since I don't want to be 'washed out' by the I.D., I 
 kerchunk the repeater.  Once the I.D. has finished, or the I.D. has not 
 been sent, I will then put out my call to see if anybody's on the air.
 
  
 
 On the road, traveling... I will kerchunk a repeater to see if I can 
 reach it.
 
  
 
 There's also the other side of the coin to this.  You think kerchunking 
 is bothersome?  How bothersome is it to be mobile, you bring up a 
 repeater, and you try to use it.  You try several times putting your 
 call out there.  Several miles later, several attempts later, you 
 discover your audio wasn't getting through.  The repeater's ears 
 weren't as good as its mouth.
 
  
 
 Give me kerchunking any day over that.
 
  
 
 73,
 
  
 
 Kim - WG8S
 


Re: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater Kerchunk

2009-03-16 Thread mwbesemer
Well said!

de WM4B

 Mike Naruta AA8K a...@comcast.net wrote: 
 
 When I make a transmission on a repeater that
 hasn't been used for a while, I state my intent
 and call sign, and the repeater ids after I let
 go of the PTT.  I have made a legal transmission,
 I gain the information that the repeater has
 been dormant, AND I know that my transmission
 held the COR/CTCSS for the entire duration of my
 transmission.  That tells me more that just
 hearing the hang time of a maybe partial
 reception of my signal.
 
 
 New hams learn by the example of existing hams.
 If you are making unidentified transmissions,
 they will make unidentified transmissions.
 
 
 
 whensle...@comcast.net wrote:
  
  
  My thoughts would be... let it be.  Do NOT let anybody know it may 
  bother you.  If they know it bothers you, they will keep doing it.
  
   
  
  As a long time ham I do kerchunk repeaters, especially my local one.  Why?
  
   
  
  To check the status and cycle of the I.D.
  
   
  
  If the repeater has been inactive for a while, when it first transmits 
  it sends its I.D.  Since I don't want to be 'washed out' by the I.D., I 
  kerchunk the repeater.  Once the I.D. has finished, or the I.D. has not 
  been sent, I will then put out my call to see if anybody's on the air.
  
   
  
  On the road, traveling... I will kerchunk a repeater to see if I can 
  reach it.
  
   
  
  There's also the other side of the coin to this.  You think kerchunking 
  is bothersome?  How bothersome is it to be mobile, you bring up a 
  repeater, and you try to use it.  You try several times putting your 
  call out there.  Several miles later, several attempts later, you 
  discover your audio wasn't getting through.  The repeater's ears 
  weren't as good as its mouth.
  
   
  
  Give me kerchunking any day over that.
  
   
  
  73,
  
   
  
  Kim - WG8S
  



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Micor Card needed - TLN1251A-Manual.

2009-03-16 Thread Scott Zimmerman
Eric,

Thanks for posting this. Now I have 3 card numbers I can look for.

Now if I could just find the cards.

Scott

Scott Zimmerman
Amateur Radio Call N3XCC
474 Barnett Rd
Boswell, PA 15531

- Original Message - 
From: Eric Lemmon wb6...@verizon.net
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, March 15, 2009 12:24 AM
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Micor Card needed - TLN1251A-Manual.


 Thanks to a private message from Chuck Kelsey, I finally located the tech
 data on the TLN1251A module.  The reason why I could not find the modules 
 in
 any recent Micor station manual is because those sheets were moved to the
 Micor Control and Application manual 68P81025E60-F shortly before the
 manuals were discontinued.  The attached sheet is at the very end of the 
 CA
 manual.

 73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY


 -Original Message-
 From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 [mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Eric Lemmon
 Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2009 5:34 PM
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Micor Card needed - TLN1251A-Manual.

 Steve,

 I went through more than a half-dozen Micor station manuals, and did not 
 see
 the document you describe. Could you please be more specific as to which
 manuals contain the information about the TLN1251A module?

 73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY


 -Original Message-
 From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
 [mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Steve
 Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2009 4:48 PM
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Micor Card needed - TLN1251A-Manual.

 Fortunately, the manual for these three cards (PL control, Repeater 
 Control,
 and Squelch Control) is actually in most Micor station manuals.
 Not often in the Low Band, non-unified, but is in most manuals.
 Look for the above three names or options decoder.
 Its all the same board.
 I looked, and it was in 8 of the 10 station manuals I have...






 



 Yahoo! Groups Links



 



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater Kerchunk

2009-03-16 Thread no6b
At 3/15/2009 22:15, you wrote:

The duration-based anti-kerchunk filters are way more obnoxious than the 
kerchunkers IMHO, and they also block legitimate users who make quick calls.

Not if it's implemented properly.  A proper anti-kerchunk will key the 
repeater TX on any valid input activity but will suppress the hangtime 
unless the signal remains valid for a reasonable time period.  That way the 
kerchunker doesn't see any response from the repeater.

Bob NO6B



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater Kerchunk

2009-03-16 Thread scomind
Hi Kim,

If the repeater has been inactive for a while, when it first transmits it 
sends its I.D.? Since I don't want to be 'washed out' by the I.D., I kerchunk 
the repeater.? Once the I.D. has finished, or the I.D. has not been sent, I 
will then put out my call to see if anybody's on the air.

The?controller's software algorithm?can take care of that. Ours wait?for the 
end of the?initial transmission?before sending the ID.?If?you kerchunk, you'll 
hear an?ID. But if you?identify?yourself instead, you'll make only 
one?transmission -- and there won't be another ID if there are no subsequent 
key-ups.

73,

Bob, WA9FBO
S-COM, LLC
www.scomcontrollers.com




[Repeater-Builder] Mastr Exec II question

2009-03-16 Thread k1jcnh
A friend has a VHF rptr implemented using a GE Mastr Exec II mobile.
The receiver is gone. Can I use a reciever form a straight MastrII 
mobile to replace it? Are they plug compatible?
Thanks, Joe K1JC



RE: [Repeater-Builder] Mastr Exec II question

2009-03-16 Thread Jeff DePolo

No, a Mastr II receiver will not fit in an Exec II.  While a lot of the
circuitry is similiar between the two, mechanically they're different. 

--- Jeff WN3A


 -Original Message-
 From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
 [mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of k1jcnh
 Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 1:11 PM
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Mastr Exec II question
 
 A friend has a VHF rptr implemented using a GE Mastr Exec II mobile.
 The receiver is gone. Can I use a reciever form a straight MastrII 
 mobile to replace it? Are they plug compatible?
 Thanks, Joe K1JC
 
 
 
 
 
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
 Version: 8.0.237 / Virus Database: 270.11.3/1970 - Release 
 Date: 03/16/09 07:04:00
 
 
 



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Mastr Exec II question

2009-03-16 Thread Mike Dietrich
Yes you can, all rf parts are interchangeable.
IF/AUDIO is different but most parts themselves are the same.

Mike  KB5FLX
 
  - Original Message - 
  From: k1jcnh 
  To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 12:11 PM
  Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Mastr Exec II question


  A friend has a VHF rptr implemented using a GE Mastr Exec II mobile.
  The receiver is gone. Can I use a reciever form a straight MastrII 
  mobile to replace it? Are they plug compatible?
  Thanks, Joe K1JC



  

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Mastr Exec II question

2009-03-16 Thread de W5DK
I think Jeff was correct earlier, while the front end casting / helicals of
the receivers are the same, the LO/ If / audio is mechanically different and
are not plug compatible.

73

Don Kirchner W5DK 

 

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Mike Dietrich
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 12:38 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Mastr Exec II question

 

Yes you can, all rf parts are interchangeable.

IF/AUDIO is different but most parts themselves are the same.

 

Mike  KB5FLX

 

- Original Message - 

From: k1jcnh mailto:k...@comcast.net  

To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 

Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 12:11 PM

Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Mastr Exec II question

 

A friend has a VHF rptr implemented using a GE Mastr Exec II mobile.
The receiver is gone. Can I use a reciever form a straight MastrII 
mobile to replace it? Are they plug compatible?
Thanks, Joe K1JC










[Repeater-Builder] Kerchunk

2009-03-16 Thread retiredcss01
Thanks for all the info on repeater kerchunking.  I am convinced that it's one 
of those things that are best ignored.  It's impossible to determine, like you 
say, whether it is a birdie, someother interference, or just someone checking 
to see if they have repeater coverage.  Again, thanks for all the input.

73,
Tom W5BLO



RE: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater Kerchunk

2009-03-16 Thread Nate Duehr
We've successfully used the S-COM variant of this for years, here.
anti-kerchunk set up correctly, works fine.  (That is, it's NOT active until
the repeater has been IN-active for quite a while.)

 

The reality though is that it just trains the kerchunkers to do longer
kerchunks.  The problem doesn't really go away, but at least you know it's a
valid signal (with CTCSS decode on at the repeater site), and it gives you a
longer transmission to DF, if you're really interested and care. most of the
time, no one does.

 

Mixing the activation of the anti-kerchunk with a voice ID from the repeater
at least gives the kerchunkers something to listen to, since the majority of
them are licensed hams looking to see if they can hear the repeater.  This
seems to minimize CONTINUOUS kerchunking. they do it once, get a very long
voice ID back, and they're satisfied.

 

Some people are just morons who can't be bothered to take a moment to say
their callsign once or even more politely, saying their callsign and
testing, instead of just kerchunking illegally.  

 

You can't fix stupid.  All you can do is set up your repeater controller to
make being stupid, really annoying for the stupid guy.

 

As someone else pointed out, if you build the repeater to act more like a
commercial system with CTCSS only transmitted on real user input, no one
hears the transmitter tail and kerchunks are really boring for anyone
running CTCSS decode. you hear a click, and that's it.  

 

Kerchunkers are just a part of life when you run repeaters, basically.

 

Nate 

 

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul Plack
Sent: Sunday, March 15, 2009 11:16 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater Kerchunk

 

The duration-based anti-kerchunk filters are way more obnoxious than the
kerchunkers IMHO, and they also block legitimate users who make quick calls.

 

73,

Paul, AE4KR



[Repeater-Builder] Re: PURC5000 Repeater Controller Interfacing?

2009-03-16 Thread Jared
I've been trying for the past 2 days to get my PURC5000 w/ Advanced 
Control to work with an RC-210 controller.  I figured out the PTT, but it won't 
transmit any audio.  All I'm getting 
is a dead carrier.  So far, here's what I've done:


RC-210PURC J2
-----
PTT--Ext Key Request (pin 9)
GND--Logic Gnd (pin 7) and Analog Gnd (pins 1  2)
TX Audio-Ext Aux Audio (pin 22)


I've also tied 9.6V (pin 15) to Ext Mode Request (pin 24).  My manual says to 
do this when you want to key analog audio.

I've also tried tying TX Audio from RC-210 to Line 1 WIB (pin 25) instead of 
Ext Aux Audio, but still no dice.

The weird part is that if I go into the service menu and tell it to key up and 
pass audio, it transmits properly.  However when I try to call for PTT via J2, 
no audio.  When I call for PTT via J2, I can look at the stats menu and see 
that it's calling for PTT for analog and not binary which appears correct.

Any ideas where I can put TX audio and get it to transmit right?  I've set up 
the menu items to call for local control.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,

Jared 


--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, wb0vhb ran...@... wrote:

 Looking for someone who has successfully interfaced a repeater
 controller to a VHF PURC5000 with an Advanced Control.
 
 I'm attempting to use a Zetron Model 48B to encode PL tones.
 
 Need to know where to inject transmit audio and PL encode tones as
 well as PTT.
 
 Randy
 WB0VHB





RE: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater Kerchunk

2009-03-16 Thread Nate Duehr
Your call + testing is fine.  If a kerchunk is good enough for you to
confirm that you have solid communications in the first place, just make the
transmission legal and if someone replies, great.  If they don't, fine too.

I always reply to radio check requests that I have mine!, and when
people say for ID I ask them what else they might be using their callsign
for, and handle I tell them my handles are on the pots and pans in my
kitchen, too... so I guess I'm turning into a repeater curmudgeon!  (GRIN!)

I do the above NICELY, of course... and have a real conversation with them
anyway, tell 'em they sound fine, or that the wet noodle of a rubber duck
that's on their HT just isn't going to cut it, or whatever... 

Nate WY0X

-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Dave Gomberg
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 8:24 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater Kerchunk

At 05:13 3/16/2009, Joe wrote:

If you start to worry about the kerchunkers your going to drive yourself
crazy.  I've had several repeaters for years and have learned that the
kerchunkers are usually someone who has just discovered your repeater
and want to know how it covers an area.

I admit that on occasion I have thought of kerchunking because I 
check into several nets where I am at the limit of the repeater's 
coverage.   I would kerchunk to see if I am in range or need to move 
a bit.  I am attempting to take as little resource as 
possible.   Would it be better for me to give my call, hope someone 
comes back, and ask for a signal report?



-- 
Dave Gomberg, San Francisco   NE5EE gomberg1 at wcf dot com
All addresses, phones, etc. at http://www.wcf.com/ham/info.html
- 








Yahoo! Groups Links






Re: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater Kerchunk

2009-03-16 Thread Paul Plack
The only thing I've found effective against kerchunkers if to DF them, then, 
after a club meeting, get a dozen guys to park in his neighborhood and kerchunk 
him on the output of the repeater...

;^)

I remember in the early days of my 440 machine in Orlando, before it got 
discovered, it was so quiet I actually found myself looking forward to the 
first kerchunkers. I'd answer with, Who's the station calling? This is AE4KR, 
Orlando. I actually made a couple new friends that way.

73,
Paul, AE4KR

  - Original Message - 
  From: Nate Duehr 
  To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 12:24 PM
  Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater Kerchunk


  Your call + testing is fine. If a kerchunk is good enough for you to
  confirm that you have solid communications in the first place, just make the
  transmission legal and if someone replies, great. If they don't, fine too.



  

[Repeater-Builder] Kenwood TKR 820

2009-03-16 Thread Ted Leonard
I am not a Kenwood guy so thought I would throw out this question.
I seem to recall that some Kenwood UHF repeaters would do ham split and some 
won't?
FCC ID # ALH9TKTKR 820-1
Thanks,
Ted W3VG

[Repeater-Builder] Andrews hard line help

2009-03-16 Thread Rick Szajkowski
Hello to the group ... I need to run some new 7/8 hard line and some 1/2
inch

Question is there any info on installing the ends on both I did a google
search and not luck

any help would be great and also any special tools ?

Thanks in advance ..

Rick


Re: [Repeater-Builder] Andrews hard line help

2009-03-16 Thread Chuck Kelsey
There is an instruction sheet that comes with the new connectors, so you should 
be all set when you get them. No special tools required.

Chuck
WB2EDV



  - Original Message - 
  From: Rick Szajkowski 
  To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 3:11 PM
  Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Andrews hard line help


  Hello to the group ... I need to run some new 7/8 hard line and some 1/2 inch 

  Question is there any info on installing the ends on both I did a google 
search and not luck 

  any help would be great and also any special tools ?

  Thanks in advance .. 

  Rick



  

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater Kerchunk

2009-03-16 Thread ka9qjg
 
._,___ Well I will have to admit I have got a New ant Mobile and Base
really did not feel like Talking to anyone but Just Kerchunked   a
Distant Repeater to see if I was getting into it, I also think this was
done more because a Lot of Hams including Myself actually had a Hard
time understand the Fast CW Id . 
 
I think it is done less now that  We will hear a Voice Id On  a lot of
Repeaters including My 224.740 ,  But CW Voice on My  444.750 at about 7
WPM A min some of the  Old CW Hams  laugh and ask why is it so Slow and
I say  because I know what its lol 
 
PS Most have at least done it once you know who you are  ,  and where in
the Heck did this Word KERCHUNK Originate from We all know what it means

 
Happy Repeater Building 
 
Don KA9QJG 
 


Re: [Repeater-Builder] Andrews hard line help

2009-03-16 Thread Rick Szajkowski
no new ends :(  all NOS) but no distructions ... so any and all help .

I will go look at the ends and see if I can read part #'s



On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Chuck Kelsey wb2...@roadrunner.com wrote:

There is an instruction sheet that comes with the new connectors, so
 you should be all set when you get them. No special tools required.

 Chuck
 WB2EDV




 - Original Message -
 *From:* Rick Szajkowski va3r...@gmail.com
 *To:* Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 *Sent:* Monday, March 16, 2009 3:11 PM
 *Subject:* [Repeater-Builder] Andrews hard line help

 Hello to the group ... I need to run some new 7/8 hard line and some 1/2
 inch

 Question is there any info on installing the ends on both I did a google
 search and not luck

 any help would be great and also any special tools ?

 Thanks in advance ..

 Rick

  



[Repeater-Builder] Motorola Rib

2009-03-16 Thread Ralph S. Turk
I am in need of the pin out connections for the 

RJ 45 to DB 25 cable used with a Motorola Rib 

I have searched the RB site but can't seem to find 

it. 

Thanks in advance.. 

Ralph, W7HSG 


RE: [Repeater-Builder] Motorola Rib

2009-03-16 Thread ka9qjg
Ralph it is Probably on this site somewhere if Not check here
http://www.batlabs.com/
 
Hope that Helps 
 
Good Luck 
 
Don KA9QJG 
 
___


RE: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater Kerchunk

2009-03-16 Thread Nate Duehr
If you’re getting “washed out” by your repeater ID, you definitely bought the 
wrong controller or have it programmed wrong.  :-)

 

It shouldn’t be ID’ing as soon as it comes on the air, it should ID on the 
UNKEY event after the kerchunk.

 

Some controllers are smart, some controllers are stupid… time to upgrade…

 

Nate WY0X

 

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of whensle...@comcast.net
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 8:37 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater Kerchunk

 

My thoughts would be... let it be.  Do NOT let anybody know it may bother you.  
If they know it bothers you, they will keep doing it.

 

As a long time ham I do kerchunk repeaters, especially my local one.  Why?

 

To check the status and cycle of the I.D.

 

If the repeater has been inactive for a while, when it first transmits it sends 
its I.D.  Since I don't want to be 'washed out' by the I.D., I kerchunk the 
repeater.  Once the I.D. has finished, or the I.D. has not been sent, I will 
then put out my call to see if anybody's on the air.

 

On the road, traveling... I will kerchunk a repeater to see if I can reach it.

 

There's also the other side of the coin to this.  You think kerchunking is 
bothersome?  How bothersome is it to be mobile, you bring up a repeater, and 
you try to use it.  You try several times putting your call out there.  Several 
miles later, several attempts later, you discover your audio wasn't getting 
through.  The repeater's ears weren't as good as its mouth.

 

Give me kerchunking any day over that.

 

73,

 

Kim - WG8S 










RE: [Repeater-Builder] Andrews hard line help

2009-03-16 Thread Nate Duehr
Just checking here. they're usually INSIDE the little red  white boxes that
the connectors come in.   Did you get those and/or have you looked inside
real carefully?

 

If they're really NOS, I'd think they'd still be in their boxes. 

 

Nate WY0X

 

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Rick Szajkowski
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 1:25 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Andrews hard line help

 

no new ends :(  all NOS) but no distructions ... so any and all help . 

I will go look at the ends and see if I can read part #'s




On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Chuck Kelsey wb2...@roadrunner.com wrote:

There is an instruction sheet that comes with the new connectors, so you
should be all set when you get them. No special tools required.

 

Chuck

WB2EDV

 

 

 

- Original Message - 

From: Rick Szajkowski mailto:va3r...@gmail.com  

To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 

Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 3:11 PM

Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Andrews hard line help

 

Hello to the group ... I need to run some new 7/8 hard line and some 1/2
inch 

Question is there any info on installing the ends on both I did a google
search and not luck 

any help would be great and also any special tools ?

Thanks in advance .. 

Rick











Re: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater Kerchunk

2009-03-16 Thread scomind
Hi Don,

and where in the Heck did this Word KERCHUNK Originate from We all know what 
it means 

Early tube-type?repeaters?used large relays?to key the transmitter. When 
someone keyed and unkeyed the repeater the result really was a loud?kerchunk 
at the site. It led to what we now call courtesy delays -- the idea being if 
there was another transmission soon after the first the transmitter would not 
have to drop and pick up again. It saved tubes as well as relays.

73,
Bob, WA9FBO


Re: [Repeater-Builder] Andrews hard line help

2009-03-16 Thread Chuck Kelsey
OK, Google the Andrew site and there is likely a support section that may have 
installation instructions.

Chuck
WB2EDV



  - Original Message - 
  From: Rick Szajkowski 
  To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 3:24 PM
  Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Andrews hard line help


  no new ends :(  all NOS) but no distructions ... so any and all help . 

  I will go look at the ends and see if I can read part #'s




  On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Chuck Kelsey wb2...@roadrunner.com wrote:


There is an instruction sheet that comes with the new connectors, so you 
should be all set when you get them. No special tools required.

Chuck
WB2EDV



  - Original Message - 
  From: Rick Szajkowski 
  To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 3:11 PM
  Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Andrews hard line help


  Hello to the group ... I need to run some new 7/8 hard line and some 1/2 
inch 

  Question is there any info on installing the ends on both I did a google 
search and not luck 

  any help would be great and also any special tools ?

  Thanks in advance .. 

  Rick





  

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Andrews hard line help

2009-03-16 Thread Chuck Kelsey
Try here. Looks like you can download info for all their connectors.
http://awapps.commscope.com/catalog/andrew/product.aspx?id=46

Chuck
WB2EDV


  - Original Message - 
  From: Rick Szajkowski 
  To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 3:24 PM
  Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Andrews hard line help


  no new ends :(  all NOS) but no distructions ... so any and all help . 

  I will go look at the ends and see if I can read part #'s




  On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Chuck Kelsey wb2...@roadrunner.com wrote:


There is an instruction sheet that comes with the new connectors, so you 
should be all set when you get them. No special tools required.

Chuck
WB2EDV



  - Original Message - 
  From: Rick Szajkowski 
  To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 3:11 PM
  Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Andrews hard line help


  Hello to the group ... I need to run some new 7/8 hard line and some 1/2 
inch 

  Question is there any info on installing the ends on both I did a google 
search and not luck 

  any help would be great and also any special tools ?

  Thanks in advance .. 

  Rick





  

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Micor Mobile TLD8262B10 Exciter Question

2009-03-16 Thread n4tua
Thats what I call things that have been relocated to my shack. Actually 
my trash is stuff. It changes names when it enters the shack.
Collin


-Original Message-
From: Mike Besemer (WM4B) mwbese...@cox.net
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 6:00 am
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Micor Mobile TLD8262B10 Exciter 
Question









Trash?  What the heck is ‘trash’?

 

de WM4B

 




 From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of n4...@aol.com
Sent: Sunday, March 15, 2009 11:38 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Micor Mobile TLD8262B10 Exciter 
Question



 




Mike,
Don't pitch em in the trash, I'll take em.
Collin

-Original Message-
From: Mike Besemer (WM4B) mwbese...@cox.net
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 10:35 pm
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Micor Mobile TLD8262B10 Exciter
Question

Guys,

 

As I said in my previous post, I DID that.  No joy. 

 

Mike

WM4B

 

--

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Don Kupferschmidt
Sent: Sunday, March 15, 2009 10:33 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Micor Mo
bile TLD8262B10 Exciter
Question

 

Mike,

Take the advise that Skipp has given you.

In one project I didn't heed the advise of others to preset the coils
from
the service manual and I was pulling my hair out for days trying to
figure
out why the exciter wouldn't tune up properly.

Do like he says . . . . reset everything back to the chart indicated
height
position. Then use the manual to tune up the exciter. Trust me, (and
others), the exciter *will* tune up properly UNLESS you have something
else
going on.

73,

Don, KD9PT

- Original Message -
From: skipp025 skipp...@yahoo.com
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, March2015, 2009 8:57 PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Micor Mobile TLD8262B10 Exciter Question


 Based on my experience with radios like the Micor Mobile with
 the tx band-pass filter and the MSR-2000 exciter... the best
 way to tune up these units is to find the coil preset information
 in the Service Manual and start with reseting those items back
 to the chart indicated height position.

 Sure you can adjust some coils when moving the exciter small
 distances from the last operating frequency. But some coils
 are not simple peak or dip adjustments. They interact with the
 previous or trailing coil adjustments and should be adjusted
 per the manual only... re-tweaks just don't do it.

 In the process of tuning the exciter 
and related filters you'll
 sometimes see only slight meter movements as you step up through
 the chain/process. One stage adjustment of the MSR-2000 is really
 hard to see initial meter movement.

 A re-tweak of the exciter won't always show the mentioned small
 meter movements and it's sometimes very easy to adjust a stage
 to a wrong peak/dip.

 So start from scratch most every time. Be sure to use the coil
 position chart information provided in the manual or your results
 will surely vary.

 cheers,
 s.

 Mike Besemer \(WM4B\) mwbese...@... wrote:

 Not lookin' good for the home-team. I've got some reading at the
meter
 plug
 pin
3, but L403 doesn't effect it at all. No indication at meter
plug 4
 at
 all. Guess I need to troubleshoot or scare up another exciter. Good
 thing
 this is a long-term project!



 73,



 Mike

 WM4B



 From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 [mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Eric Lemmon
 Sent: Sunday, March 15, 2009 4:46 PM
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Micor Mobile TLD8262B10 Exciter
Question



 Mike,

 Probably. The fact that you could receive the signal suggests that
the
 exciter is working, but just has a very low output. Tuning should
fix
 that.
 Most commercial-band VHF20exciters will tune to 2m without
modification,
 but
 that is not always the case.

 73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY

 -Original Message-
 From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
 [mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Mike
Besemer
 (WM4B)
 Sent: Sunday, March 15, 2009 1:30 PM
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
 Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Micor Mobile TLD8262B10 Exciter
Question

 Eric,

 Got that. thanks. But the exciter is okay as-is (except for tuning),
is
 that correct?

 Mike


From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
 [mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Eric
Lemmon
 Sent: Sunday, March 15, 2009 4:19 PM
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
 Subject: RE: 

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Andrews hard line help

2009-03-16 Thread n4tua
Rick,
I have a pdf of installation instructions for the ring flare type 
connector. Let me know if you need.
Collin


-Original Message-
From: Rick Szajkowski va3r...@gmail.com
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 3:11 pm
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Andrews hard line help






Hello to the group ... I need to run some new 7/8 hard line and some 
1/2 inch

Question is there any info on installing the ends on both I did a 
google search and not luck

any help would be great and also any special tools ?

Thanks in advance ..

Rick







[Repeater-Builder] 220Mhz. 400W RF amplifier

2009-03-16 Thread w4dg.geo

ITT AM-6155 220Mhz. AMP. Completely modified and operating on 220 Mhz.
Adjustable power output up t0 400 watts output with built-in 120v/240v
AC internal power supply.

With full documentation. $400.00 (firm) + frieght/insurance. (At 200w
output, continuous repeater duty was very cool). Contact via email
w...@tampabaybay.rr.com mailto:w...@tampabaybay.rr.com .  Local pickup
OK. Located in Tampa Bay, Florida area.





RE: [Repeater-Builder] Kenwood TKR 820

2009-03-16 Thread Andy Brinkley
The TKR-820 you have will do 440 amateur with proper programming / tuning /
realignment, no component changes needed.
 

Andy
--
NC Certified Firefighter III / EMT-A
FCC Licensed Technician / Amateur Call NC4AB / Echolink Node 5761
 http://www.brinkleyelectronics.com/ www.brinkleyelectronics.com

  

 

  _  

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Ted Leonard
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 3:02 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Kenwood TKR 820




I am not a Kenwood guy so thought I would throw out this question.
I seem to recall that some Kenwood UHF repeaters would do ham split and some
won't?
FCC ID # ALH9TKTKR 820-1
Thanks,
Ted W3VG




RE: [Repeater-Builder] Mastr Exec II question

2009-03-16 Thread Thomas Oliver
You could use MVP parts they are the same boards just have some pins coming
out the bottom instead of the top. Or I could ship you one for $30.00

tom


 [Original Message]
 From: Jeff DePolo j...@broadsci.com
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Date: 3/16/2009 1:35:30 PM
 Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Mastr Exec II question


 No, a Mastr II receiver will not fit in an Exec II.  While a lot of the
 circuitry is similiar between the two, mechanically they're different. 

   --- Jeff WN3A


  -Original Message-
  From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
  [mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of k1jcnh
  Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 1:11 PM
  To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Mastr Exec II question
  
  A friend has a VHF rptr implemented using a GE Mastr Exec II mobile.
  The receiver is gone. Can I use a reciever form a straight MastrII 
  mobile to replace it? Are they plug compatible?
  Thanks, Joe K1JC
  
  
  
  
  
  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
  Version: 8.0.237 / Virus Database: 270.11.3/1970 - Release 
  Date: 03/16/09 07:04:00
  
  
  



 



 Yahoo! Groups Links






RE: [Repeater-Builder] Andrews hard line help

2009-03-16 Thread Jeff DePolo

 Hello to the group ... I need to run some new 7/8 hard line 
 and some 1/2 inch 
 
 Question is there any info on installing the ends on both I 
 did a google search and not luck 
 
 any help would be great and also any special tools ?

It's easier if you have Andrew's tools (or whoever's), but you can get by
with basic hand tools, especially after a little practice.  However, the
actual instructions vary with the type and series of connector.  If you post
(or direct e-mail) the model numbers for the connectors I can either tell
you how to do it, or probably go pull the sheets out of new connectors and
scan them.  You can probably find installation instructions on Andrew's web
site, but I don't know if they'll have the docs for anything other than
current-vintage connectors.  

--- Jeff WN3A



[Repeater-Builder] DB224 parts orderable?

2009-03-16 Thread Aaron Sloan
Hi guys and gals,

I'm wondering if it is possible to order the dipole and coax kit for the 
Andrews/DB products DB224e minus the mast.  No point in getting another 
mast and paying $XX is shipping.

Thanks!
73,
Aaron ka0zoz


Re: [Repeater-Builder] DB224 parts orderable?

2009-03-16 Thread Chuck Kelsey
I do not believe that you can. You may, however, be able to do that with 
Telewave products (at least they did in the past).


Chuck
WB2EDV




- Original Message - 
From: Aaron Sloan aa...@sixone.org
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 5:32 PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] DB224 parts orderable?


 Hi guys and gals,

 I'm wondering if it is possible to order the dipole and coax kit for the
 Andrews/DB products DB224e minus the mast.  No point in getting another
 mast and paying $XX is shipping.

 Thanks!
 73,
 Aaron ka0zoz





RE: [Repeater-Builder] 220Mhz. 400W RF amplifier

2009-03-16 Thread Michael Ryan
I am interested in this amplifier.  But emails direct to you have been
returned.  -Mike

 

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of w4dg.geo
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 4:34 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] 220Mhz. 400W RF amplifier

 

ITT AM-6155 220Mhz. AMP. Completely modified and operating on 220 Mhz.
Adjustable power output up t0 400 watts output with built-in 120v/240v AC
internal power supply. 

With full documentation. $400.00 (firm) + frieght/insurance. (At 200w
output, continuous repeater duty was very cool). Contact via email
w...@tampabaybay.rr.com.  Local pickup OK. Located in Tampa Bay, Florida
area.





__ NOD32 3937 (20090314) Information __

This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com



[Repeater-Builder] Re: Andrews hard line help

2009-03-16 Thread Craig
Rick

Go to the files section and there is a file there Andrew bulletin 37383C.pdf 
that is the instruction sheet for connectors.

Craig

--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Rick Szajkowski va3r...@... wrote:

 Hello to the group ... I need to run some new 7/8 hard line and some 1/2 inch
 
 Question is there any info on installing the ends on both I did a google 
 search and not luck any help would be great and also any special tools ?
 
 Thanks in advance ..
 
 Rick





[Repeater-Builder] Re: Repeater Kerchunk

2009-03-16 Thread Laryn Lohman
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Nate Duehr n...@... wrote:

 If you're getting washed out by your repeater ID, you definitely bought the 
 wrong controller or have it programmed wrong.  :-)


Or the ID level is simply too high...

Laryn K8TVZ




[Repeater-Builder] quote for duplexers needed

2009-03-16 Thread ww3s73
Our county EMA office is going to purchase us a new set of duplexers for our 
repeater, but we need at least 2 quotes on a company letterhead. Can't find any 
ham dealers that sell them, anybody know a company that deals in duplexers? 



[Repeater-Builder] HELP Midland 10 meter Z-273 program

2009-03-16 Thread Carlos Padro
Please I have a 10 meter band midland Radio, I need who can program the Z-273 
module. 
 
Thanks 
Carlos Padro wp4mjp 
787-379-0062


  

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Andrews hard line help

2009-03-16 Thread Jeff DePolo
 
 Rick
 
 Go to the files section and there is a file there Andrew 
 bulletin 37383C.pdf that is the instruction sheet for connectors.
 
 Craig

That sheet is for the early L4 series solder-type connectors; it may or may
not be applicable to the original post since we don't know which connectors
he has.  It's definately not applicable for the 7/8th's.  Andrew has come
out with serveral different series of connectors since the days of the
original L series (without a suffix).  The L series connectors came out when
LDF first came out, replacing the HSJ series.  For exmaple, RingFlare,
OnePiece, Posi-Stop, and EZfit are some of the newer series that come to
mind.  

It would be best if the original poster listed which connectors he has on
hand, and what kind of cable he has (for example, LDF5-50A isn't the same as
LDF5-50B, and the connectors aren't interchangable either).

--- Jeff WN3A





RE: [Repeater-Builder] IWCE 2009 Next Week

2009-03-16 Thread Juan Tellez
I am going to be there Skipp, hope meet you at the Kenwood boot.

 

Juan Tellez, XE2SI 

 

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of skipp025
Sent: Sunday, March 15, 2009 9:12 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] IWCE 2009 Next Week

 


Re: IWCE 2009 

If any of you plan to attend IWCE Las Vegas next week... I and 
the other nair do wells from the radiowrench world will be 
there at least on Wednesday. 

Like Brigadoon we appear at least once every (hundred) year(s) 
for certain events like IWCE and Dayton. 

If you're going to be there and would like to grip and grin with 
us please feel free to drop me a note (Email). No brauts (brats) 
for sale (at least worth eating) but they did have a pretty killer 
smoothy booth with very perty girls near the main entrance last 
year. 

Come see for yourself how many of the larger radios companies 
don't really support small two-way radio dealers (very well) 
anymore. Ops, didn't mean to say that... (well maybe I did actually). 

Hope to see some of you there... 10-4 and out 

chow for now
skipp 

www.radiowrench.com 





__ Información de ESET Smart Security, versión de la base de firmas
de virus %s __

ESET Smart Security ha comprobado este mensaje.
http://www.eset.com



Re: [Repeater-Builder] quote for duplexers needed

2009-03-16 Thread Ken Arck
At 03:55 PM 3/16/2009, ww3s73 wrote:

Our county EMA office is going to purchase us a new set of duplexers 
for our repeater, but we need at least 2 quotes on a company 
letterhead. Can't find any ham dealers that sell them, anybody know 
a company that deals in duplexers?


---We an authorized Telewave dealer. Send me mail offlist of your requirements

Ken
--
President and CTO - Arcom Communications
Makers of repeater controllers and accessories.
http://www.arcomcontrollers.com/
Authorized Dealers for Kenwood and Telewave and
we offer complete repeater packages!
AH6LE/R - IRLP Node 3000
http://www.irlp.net
We don't just make 'em. We use 'em!



RE: [Repeater-Builder] quote for duplexers needed

2009-03-16 Thread Nate Duehr
Should I be the bad guy and say it?  

*ALL* of the commercial distributors (re-)sell them.

Now to make that answer more useful... who are the commercial distributors?

Telewave's own sales folks should be able to find you about four metric tons
of dealership names and phone numbers... 

http://www.telewave.com/sales.html

I'd also be surprised if your county's radio shop didn't already have a
dealer they like to use who provides them at a significant discount to
government purchasers.  Have you talked to them?  Having the county
purchaser make the request for quote on THEIR letterhead should garner at
the VERY least, a 10-15% automatic discount from all the major
distributors, as far as I've seen.

People here will probably also reply with the 'big names' like Tessco and
others.  There are a few national dealers of all things RF related, but
I'd start with the local shop and see where THEY order through, and who they
trust... plus they may already have accounts there, and may also have
authorization to purchase from them (due to contractual discount rates) that
allow them to NOT have to have multiple quotes from multiple companies.

You just never know... 

Hope that helps.

Nate WY0X

-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of ww3s73
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 4:55 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] quote for duplexers needed

Our county EMA office is going to purchase us a new set of duplexers for our
repeater, but we need at least 2 quotes on a company letterhead. Can't find
any ham dealers that sell them, anybody know a company that deals in
duplexers? 





RE: [Repeater-Builder] quote for duplexers needed

2009-03-16 Thread Nate Duehr
p.s. I can't figure out how I got the impression you were looking for a
Telewave product.

Did you say?  Now I don't see it.

Who's duplexers are you looking at?  There's multiple vendors selling them
these days, of different quality, of course.

Many people seem to like TX-RX for brand new stuff, lately.  

Lots of used gear on the market that you'll NEVER be able to get a quote on,
too... but will come in for you and your county's budget at 1/4 to 1/3 the
price...

Nate WY0X

-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Nate Duehr
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 6:15 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] quote for duplexers needed

Should I be the bad guy and say it?  

*ALL* of the commercial distributors (re-)sell them.

Now to make that answer more useful... who are the commercial distributors?

Telewave's own sales folks should be able to find you about four metric tons
of dealership names and phone numbers... 

http://www.telewave.com/sales.html

I'd also be surprised if your county's radio shop didn't already have a
dealer they like to use who provides them at a significant discount to
government purchasers.  Have you talked to them?  Having the county
purchaser make the request for quote on THEIR letterhead should garner at
the VERY least, a 10-15% automatic discount from all the major
distributors, as far as I've seen.

People here will probably also reply with the 'big names' like Tessco and
others.  There are a few national dealers of all things RF related, but
I'd start with the local shop and see where THEY order through, and who they
trust... plus they may already have accounts there, and may also have
authorization to purchase from them (due to contractual discount rates) that
allow them to NOT have to have multiple quotes from multiple companies.

You just never know... 

Hope that helps.

Nate WY0X

-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of ww3s73
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 4:55 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] quote for duplexers needed

Our county EMA office is going to purchase us a new set of duplexers for our
repeater, but we need at least 2 quotes on a company letterhead. Can't find
any ham dealers that sell them, anybody know a company that deals in
duplexers? 









Yahoo! Groups Links






RE: [Repeater-Builder] quote for duplexers needed

2009-03-16 Thread Nate Duehr
p.p.s. Oh duh, it was Ken's reply.  (Hi Ken.)

You may want to look at Bird/TX-RX also... 

http://birdtechnologies.thomasnet.com/viewitems/all-categories-duplexers-and
-triplexers/duplexers-2?forward=1

Nate WY0X

-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Nate Duehr
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 6:17 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] quote for duplexers needed

p.s. I can't figure out how I got the impression you were looking for a
Telewave product.

Did you say?  Now I don't see it.

Who's duplexers are you looking at?  There's multiple vendors selling them
these days, of different quality, of course.

Many people seem to like TX-RX for brand new stuff, lately.  

Lots of used gear on the market that you'll NEVER be able to get a quote on,
too... but will come in for you and your county's budget at 1/4 to 1/3 the
price...

Nate WY0X

-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Nate Duehr
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 6:15 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] quote for duplexers needed

Should I be the bad guy and say it?  

*ALL* of the commercial distributors (re-)sell them.

Now to make that answer more useful... who are the commercial distributors?

Telewave's own sales folks should be able to find you about four metric tons
of dealership names and phone numbers... 

http://www.telewave.com/sales.html

I'd also be surprised if your county's radio shop didn't already have a
dealer they like to use who provides them at a significant discount to
government purchasers.  Have you talked to them?  Having the county
purchaser make the request for quote on THEIR letterhead should garner at
the VERY least, a 10-15% automatic discount from all the major
distributors, as far as I've seen.

People here will probably also reply with the 'big names' like Tessco and
others.  There are a few national dealers of all things RF related, but
I'd start with the local shop and see where THEY order through, and who they
trust... plus they may already have accounts there, and may also have
authorization to purchase from them (due to contractual discount rates) that
allow them to NOT have to have multiple quotes from multiple companies.

You just never know... 

Hope that helps.

Nate WY0X

-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of ww3s73
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 4:55 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] quote for duplexers needed

Our county EMA office is going to purchase us a new set of duplexers for our
repeater, but we need at least 2 quotes on a company letterhead. Can't find
any ham dealers that sell them, anybody know a company that deals in
duplexers? 









Yahoo! Groups Links










Yahoo! Groups Links






RE: [Repeater-Builder] MSR 2000 DC Transfer Question

2009-03-16 Thread Eric Lemmon
I have sent a schematic directly to WA6LUY.

73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY



RE: [Repeater-Builder] quote for duplexers needed

2009-03-16 Thread Eric Lemmon
I can think of a few:  DB Spectra, TX-RX, RFS Celwave, Telewave, Comprod,
Sinclair.  Ham dealers normally don't sell duplexers...

73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
 

-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of ww3s73
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 3:55 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] quote for duplexers needed

Our county EMA office is going to purchase us a new set of duplexers for our
repeater, but we need at least 2 quotes on a company letterhead. Can't find
any ham dealers that sell them, anybody know a company that deals in
duplexers?



Re: [Repeater-Builder] quote for duplexers needed

2009-03-16 Thread Charles Mills
You might try Tessco if they need a commercial distributor.  Your county or
local municipality probably has someone who services their gear who might be
a dealer.

Chuck

On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Eric Lemmon wb6...@verizon.net wrote:

   I can think of a few: DB Spectra, TX-RX, RFS Celwave, Telewave, Comprod,
 Sinclair. Ham dealers normally don't sell duplexers...

 73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY



 -Original Message-
 From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.comRepeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
 [mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.comRepeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com]
 On Behalf Of ww3s73
 Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 3:55 PM
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [Repeater-Builder] quote for duplexers needed

 Our county EMA office is going to purchase us a new set of duplexers for
 our
 repeater, but we need at least 2 quotes on a company letterhead. Can't find
 any ham dealers that sell them, anybody know a company that deals in
 duplexers?

  




-- 
=
Charles L. Mills
Westmoreland Co. ARES EC
Amateur Radio Callsign W3YNI
Email: w3y...@gmail.com


Re: [Repeater-Builder] HELP Midland 10 meter Z-273 program

2009-03-16 Thread Jon Bivin - WB0VTM
I have a Midland Z-273 programmer, how can I help?

-Jon - WB0VTM

(You can reach me directly at wb0...@earthlink.net )


  - Original Message - 
  From: Carlos Padro 
  To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 6:16 PM
  Subject: [Repeater-Builder] HELP Midland 10 meter Z-273 program


Please I have a 10 meter band midland Radio, I need who can program the 
Z-273 module. 

Thanks 
Carlos Padro wp4mjp 
787-379-0062 


  

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Kerchunk

2009-03-16 Thread Jack Taylor
Actually it's not impossible to determine the source of kerchunking but it can 
be
expensive and time consuming.  Every repeater SysOp should consider having
a doppler DF capability to aid in locating the source of malicious interference.

Jack - N7OO

  - Original Message - 
  From: retiredcss01 
  To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 10:34 AM
  Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Kerchunk


  Thanks for all the info on repeater kerchunking. I am convinced that it's one 
of those things that are best ignored. It's impossible to determine, like you 
say, whether it is a birdie, someother interference, or just someone checking 
to see if they have repeater coverage. Again, thanks for all the input.

  73,
  Tom W5BLO


  


--



  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
  Version: 8.0.237 / Virus Database: 270.11.15/2004 - Release Date: 03/16/09 
07:04:00


Re: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater Kerchunk

2009-03-16 Thread no6b
At 3/15/2009 22:15, you wrote:

The duration-based anti-kerchunk filters are way more obnoxious than the 
kerchunkers IMHO, and they also block legitimate users who make quick calls.

Not if it's implemented properly.  A proper anti-kerchunk will key the 
repeater TX on any valid input activity but will suppress the hangtime 
unless the signal remains valid for a reasonable time period.  That way the 
kerchunker doesn't see any response from the repeater.

Bob NO6B



[Repeater-Builder] OFF TOPIC - DOD Ends Sale of Expended Military Brass to Remanuctures

2009-03-16 Thread n3dab
This post is OFF TOPIC, but if you value your 2nd Amendment rights you should 
read and act on this as you see fit.  I recieved this from a friend and thought 
it was important enough to make an exception to the rule.  Please let this be 
the only post on this subject on this site as the owner has granted me 
permission to post this item. I apologize for the length of the post and thank 
Kevin for his permission.

DOD Ends Sale of Expended Military Brass to Remanufacturers*

Sunday, March 15, 2009

/AND SO IT BEGINS.../

We all wondered when it was going to start.

When the new administration would make their move against us as gun owners. Oh, 
everyone got upset about HR45--I'll bet I got over 100  e-mails warning me 
about this draconian gun registration bill that had been introduced in Congress.

I was really glad to see Tom Gresham, host of Gun Talk Radio, an editor, 
writer, television host on Self-Defense TV, and one of the foremost gun 
spokespersons, come out and tell everyone to stop worrying about legislation so 
absolutely over-the-top--it would never get out of committee.

Tom said save your energy for when we really need it--don't expend it trying to 
warn everyone in your e-mail list about legislation that would go nowhere.

Now, Tom just interviewed me, and Larry Haynie, owner of Georgia Arms 
(www.georgia-arms.com http://www.georgia-arms.com/), on Gun Talk 
(www.guntalk.com http://www.guntalk.com/)--and Tom agrees, now is the time to 
...unleash the hounds... by which he means start e-mailing and writing your 
senators and congressmen.

Now it has come clear...now we know what they intend to do.

It is an end-run around Congress. They don't need to try to ban guns--they 
don't need to fight a massive battle to attempt gun registration, or limit 
assault weapon sales.

Nope. All they have to do is limit the amount of ammunition available to the 
civilian market, and when bullets dry up, guns will be useless.

Think we jest?

Here are copies of two letters sent to Georgia Arms just Thursday 
evening--effectively cancelling a contract he had to purchase 30,000 pounds of 
expended military brass in .223, 7.62mm, and .50caliber:

   
/Dear Valued Customer:

Please take a moment to note important changes set forth by the Defense 
Logistics Agency:

Recently it has been determined that fired munitions of all calibers, shapes 
and sizes have been designated to be Demil code B.As a result and in
conjunction with DLA's current Demil code B policy, this notice will serve as 
official notification which requires Scrap Venture (SV) to implement mutilation 
as a condition of sale for all sales of fired munitions effective immediately. 
This notice also requires SV to immediately cease delivery of any fired 
munitions that have been recently sold or on active term contracts, unless the 
material has been mutilated prior to sale or SV personnel can attest to the 
mutilation after delivery. A certificate of destruction is required in either 
case.

Thank you,

DOD Surplus
15051 N Kierland Blvd # 300
Scottsdale, AZ 85254
/

 ** 

 

/March 12, 2009

Larry Haynie
Georgia Arms
PO Box 238
Villa Rica, GA 30180

Re: Event 7084-6200:

Dear Larry Haynie,

Effective immediately DOD Surplus, LLC, will be implementing new requirements 
for mutilation of fired shell casings. The new DRMS requirement calls for DOD 
Surplus personnel to witness the mutilation of the property and sign the 
Certificate of Destruction.  Mutilation of the property can be done at the 
DRMO, if permitted by the Government, or it may be mutilated at a site chosen 
by the buyer. Mutilation means that the property will be destroyed to the 
extent prevents its reuse or reconstruction. DOD Surplus personnel will 
determine when property has been sufficiently mutilated to meet the 
requirements of the Government.

If you do not agree with the new conditions of your spot sale, please sign the 
appropriate box provided below stating that you do not agree to the new terms 
and would like to cancel your purchase effective immediately. If you do agree 
to the new terms please sign in the appropriate box provided below to 
acknowledge your understanding and agreement with the new requirements relating 
to your purchase. Fax the signed document back to (480) 367-1450, emailed 
responses are not acceptable.

Please respond to this request no later than close of business Monday, March 
16th, 2009.

Sincerely,

Government Liquidation.
/

  **   

Got that? From now on, remanufacturers of military brass will not be able to 
buy surplus brass from DOD--actually from Government Liquidators, llc.--the 
corporation that sells surplus materials for the U.S. government. At least, not 
in any form recognizable as once-fired brass ammunition.

Now all brass ammunition will have to be shredded, and sold as scrap.

Georgia 

[Repeater-Builder] Re: HELP Midland 10 meter Z-273 program

2009-03-16 Thread skipp025
Re: Free programming of Midland Eprom Module
 
Hi Carlos, 

Please join the yahoo midland group... 

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MidlandLMR/ 


On this group you will see the following post: 

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MidlandLMR/message/7326 

Feel free to Email me direct to take advantage of my 
offer. 

cheers, 
skipp 


 Carlos Padro wp4...@... wrote:
 Please I have a 10 meter band midland Radio, I need who can program the Z-273 
 module. 
  
 Thanks 
 Carlos Padro wp4mjp 
 787-379-0062





[Repeater-Builder] Re: MSR 2000 DC Transfer Question (you can leave it in).

2009-03-16 Thread skipp025
Re: MSR 2000 DC Transfer Question 

Won't hurt anything repeater wise to leave it in.  but... if you 
remove it you have to provide channel element ground. There's a 
channel element enable wire on the transmitter (and the receiver) 
if they are not already jumpered on full time. And there are two 
extra jumpers required on the Squelch Gate Module if you remove the 
the DC Transfer or F1-Pl  Guard Tone Modules.  Look at the manual 
and I believe the SQM jumpers you need to add are JU5 and JU6. 

cheers, 
skipp 


 wa5luy wa5...@... wrote:

 Does anyone have a schematic for a TRN 5256A DC Transfer Module. I would like 
 to remove this board from the backplane if possible for a new repeater I am 
 building.
 
 Thank You





Re: [Repeater-Builder] Andrews hard line help

2009-03-16 Thread Rick Szajkowski
Thanks Nate .. :P  yes I looked inside .. there was water damage to the
box's when I got the ends with the coax ..

I will double check to see if I have any luck



On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Nate Duehr n...@natetech.com wrote:

Just checking here… they’re usually INSIDE the little red  white boxes
 that the connectors come in.   Did you get those and/or have you looked
 inside real carefully?



 If they’re really NOS, I’d think they’d still be in their boxes.



 Nate WY0X



 *From:* Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com [mailto:
 repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Rick Szajkowski
 *Sent:* Monday, March 16, 2009 1:25 PM
 *To:* Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 *Subject:* Re: [Repeater-Builder] Andrews hard line help



 no new ends :(  all NOS) but no distructions ... so any and all help .

 I will go look at the ends and see if I can read part #'s


  On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Chuck Kelsey wb2...@roadrunner.com
 wrote:

 There is an instruction sheet that comes with the new connectors, so you
 should be all set when you get them. No special tools required.



 Chuck

 WB2EDV







  - Original Message -

 *From:* Rick Szajkowski va3r...@gmail.com

 *To:* Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com

 *Sent:* Monday, March 16, 2009 3:11 PM

 *Subject:* [Repeater-Builder] Andrews hard line help



 Hello to the group ... I need to run some new 7/8 hard line and some 1/2
 inch

 Question is there any info on installing the ends on both I did a google
 search and not luck

 any help would be great and also any special tools ?

 Thanks in advance ..

 Rick





 



Re: [Repeater-Builder] MSR 2000 DC Transfer Question

2009-03-16 Thread George Henry
Whoops...  so did I.



- Original Message - 
From: Eric Lemmon wb6...@verizon.net
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 7:57 PM
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] MSR 2000 DC Transfer Question


I have sent a schematic directly to WA6LUY.
 
 73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
 



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Andrews hard line help

2009-03-16 Thread Rick Szajkowski
one of the connectors is a Andrews L45W thats a N Mail connector .. for the
7/8 Andrews hard line .. ( I cant get to the roll of 7/8 right now)

I hope to get to the other connectors tomarrow as I need a female for the
sinclare 4 bay ..

Thanks to all for the help ..  Getting ready to do Tower work :) have to do
it before the warm weather hits .. hihi

On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Jeff DePolo j...@broadsci.com wrote:

   
  Rick
 
  Go to the files section and there is a file there Andrew
  bulletin 37383C.pdf that is the instruction sheet for connectors.
 
  Craig

 That sheet is for the early L4 series solder-type connectors; it may or may
 not be applicable to the original post since we don't know which connectors
 he has. It's definately not applicable for the 7/8th's. Andrew has come
 out with serveral different series of connectors since the days of the
 original L series (without a suffix). The L series connectors came out when
 LDF first came out, replacing the HSJ series. For exmaple, RingFlare,
 OnePiece, Posi-Stop, and EZfit are some of the newer series that come to
 mind.

 It would be best if the original poster listed which connectors he has on
 hand, and what kind of cable he has (for example, LDF5-50A isn't the same
 as
 LDF5-50B, and the connectors aren't interchangable either).

 --- Jeff WN3A