Re: [RCSE] OVSS...line break policy?

2005-05-16 Thread Steve Meyer
I like Barry's thinking.  The majority of line breaks I have seen have been 
the equipments fault.Even in stiff wind #290 is very hard to break.

It is not that difficult to watch a launch and determine if it is excessive 
line tension that breaks the line.  Usually much after 60 degrees.  After 
60 degrees, a launch should be flown out.  And if the "recovery" launch is 
more than 45 seconds after last launch a re-flight of the whole group ensues.

Steve Meyer
SOAR
LSF IV

At 07:58 PM 5/16/2005, Barry Andersen wrote:
Most all the OVSS winches now use the 290# line.  It is very hard to 
break.  When out practicing, or playing, I haven't broken a line in a 
couple of years.  I have broken lines at contests, including the NATS, I 
don't launch any differently there than normally, but the line at a 
contest is sometimes questionable, was crossed and dragged by the timer 
tapping down or a host of other mysteries that has caused it to be weak in 
just one small spot.

While I guess it's possible that guys might try to purposely break a line, 
it seems a stretch to me (pun intended), moreover, if the line is good, 
it's hard or maybe not possible to break.

When we stagger launches in seeded MOM, the high score is always launching 
first, the last guy always has a slight advantage,  even then, lift is not 
often apparent right off launch.

I suggest a time limit from first guy to last guy, maybe 2 minutes, but 
launch master uses his head
 If it's longer, you get bumped to the next round where it's tougher.
If it's the last flight group, move fast.  More than one break, everybody 
comes down.  Seems like this is pretty much what we've been doing to date.

It really sucks to be penalized for a line break, particularly when nearly 
every time, it's a weak line that causes the break.  If someone has 
travelled a great distance to be essentially tossed out for a line break, 
it ain't so fun anymore.

There's enough dumb things I can do to blow a contest, purposeful line 
breaks aren't in my bag of tricks to find the air.  I don't believe that 
most pilots play that way; bad booga booga, not likely to really work, and 
might have the result Gordy got, and richly deserved,  if he was really 
playing that way.

We've done ok to date, seems to me.  I agree that we don't want to 
regulate the fun out of contests, but if I break a line, I expect a way to 
get in the air to fly, that flight group or the next.

Hey, the stakes are really high!!
My .02
Barry
On May 16, 2005, at 5:47 PM, pfsiegel wrote:
I would like to throw this topic out to the soaring exchange to see if 
there is any consensus of opinion on policy concerning  winch line breaks 
during launch, particularly during man on man competition.
What would be a good standard policy for line breaks that could be 
universally adopted for a contest series like the OVSS?
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] Receiver Malfunctions after Contact with Power Lines

2005-05-16 Thread Steve Meyer


Sound like StarWars started early out there and a phase pulse with
resulting EMF wave fried the sensitive components.
The Dark Side...

At 11:02 PM 5/16/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My Ava
encountered the power lines to the west side of our field on Sunday,
resulting in an explosion, balls of fire travelling down the line for at
least two power poles, and complete disintegration of the Ava.  Tony
Bermudez informed me tonight that two other pilots (Tony and Bill Knesek)
experienced receiver malfunctions after the incident.
 
Does anyone have knowledge of whether or how such a contact with power
lines might generate interference which would cause a receiver some
distance away to fail?
 
Browne Goodwin



[RCSE] Receiver Malfunctions after Contact with Power Lines

2005-05-16 Thread BrowneCG



My Ava encountered the power lines to the west side of our field on Sunday, 
resulting in an explosion, balls of fire travelling down the line for at least 
two power poles, and complete disintegration of the Ava.  Tony Bermudez 
informed me tonight that two other pilots (Tony and Bill Knesek) experienced 
receiver malfunctions after the incident.
 
Does anyone have knowledge of whether or how such a contact with power 
lines might generate interference which would cause a receiver some distance 
away to fail?
 
Browne Goodwin


Re: [RCSE] OVSS...line break policy?

2005-05-16 Thread Jim Carlton
On Monday 16 May 2005 07:37 pm, you wrote:
> I have gathered the data and present the followingFor what it's worth.
>
> Most contest start at 9:00 am (AT BEST) in an effort to increase readiness
> and decrease line breaks  Contestants should be allowed to register and
> have a  3 min. MAX test flight; recorded on the score card less points.
> (timer must retrieve the line during the flight..It takes about that
> long to go get the chute an walk back) This flight would not be your god
> given rightthe window would be open from 8:15 to 8:45 (sorry about your
> luck 1st come 1st serve)
> In lieu of this semi impractical thought given socialization the night
> before and pressing the "VOLUNTEERS" we move on.
Great suggestion for day one of "two day" contests for those road warriors who 
need to shake off the dust from a long drive in! I've always felt guilty 
asking for a trim flight but I guess that's the penalty for not being able to 
fly as often as I like, just a bit nervous on that first launch.
>
> Round one:  Bring em all down
> Two-final : I like Jims suggestion of reverse order with the broken line
> moving up.
> finals: (like a track meet) you get one free the other you fly out. bring
> em down till we get a fair launch.(two breaks total for the contest)
>
Second this idea.
> I have little pity for line breaks. This is a game/sport/event of assessing
> conditions and abilities.One of the better lessons I got from my mentor and
> bud Capt. Jack was a an afternoon where I pinched the tow ring between my
> fingers and learned how to tap the pedal with out the ring being pull from
> my fingers.A GRASSHOPPER
> If you got the biggest plane the heaviest foot you better be ready to max
> out from 75 ft.(it's all part of the game,how much ballast,wind)
>
> In (your) shorts.If you want to get the maxx launch bring your
> BALLS to the line and blame no one but yourself when you gotta come fly
> with me in the Fisher Price group.
Sounds like a familiar group to me...
.
>
> P.S. The BBQ for Nats looks better than ever.

Got a new tent and screened in canopy..lets hope for  warm, dry and no 
skeeters! (Yeah, right, it's the midwest, I forgot!)
>
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


[RCSE] Greening mounts for 368 needed

2005-05-16 Thread Barry Andersen
Looking for a pair of Greening mounts for a friend for JR 368
Craig must be away, haven't heard back for quite sometime.
Anyone have a pair they can part with??
Barry
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


RE: [RCSE] OVSS and Line Breaks

2005-05-16 Thread Jim Monaco
Jeff brings up a good point about the line from MNT.  Our experience is the
same.  Especially the last batch we got.  It was pieced together and some of
the line was terrible. The first contest we used it was awful, but after the
breaks from the reload were done, the line lasts great.  In the last 2
contests we had no line breaks.  Moral of the story - use the line at least
one contest prior to using it for a big event.
Jim

Jim Monaco


In the ESL we noticed that new spools from Memphis twine had bad spots
in it. After clearing the breaks, the lines rarely broke. We don't
respool between contests any more, only when the line gets ragged. This
is consistent with my experience with my own clubs and also retriever
lines too.




RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


Re: [RCSE] OVSS...line break policy?

2005-05-16 Thread Mike Remus
I like this idea a lot.  It wont knock you out of the contest for more
then one line break, but it will cost you something if it keeps
happening. 
In addition, I like to reserve the weakest winches for the alternate re
launches and usually don't bother using a battery charger on the back ups
either.
I will probably use these ideas for our Bob Steele Memorials "Sunday"
events
Lets see how it works.

Mike Remus
LOFT Glider Club
Fort Wayne IN
LSF Level 5 #112
Remember; Think small.  Big ideas upset others!

 
On Mon, 16 May 2005 18:09:13 -0500 "James V. Bacus"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At 04:47 PM 5/16/2005, pfsiegel wrote:
> >What about a compromise to allow one line break per day, with the 
> >provision that in the opinion of the launch master that there has 
> not been 
> >an intentional attempt to break the line?
> >
> >Or???
> 
> Here's another compromise that I thought about at one time, but 
> never 
> posted.  I may have talked to TK about it on one of our many car 
> trips to 
> or from an OVSS contest.  (although I really hate mentioning this 
> stuff one 
> week before the series.  Better off discussed post series, and 
> perhaps 
> limited to the OVSS yahoo group with the guys who fly the series.)
> 
> Allow one line break a day.
> 
> Additional line breaks in future rounds are allowed a re-launch, but 
> cost 
> you 30 seconds off the task time for the round.
> 
> More than two line breaks in a flight group, the entire group has to 
> 
> relaunch, but those line breaks count and penalties are applied if 
> applicable for those pilots (i.e. it wasn't their first one).
> 
> If a pilot breaks the line on the relaunch, the flight counts and 
> the 30 
> second penalty is applied.
> 
> Just a suggestion.
> 
> 
> Jim
> Downers Grove, IL
> Member of the Chicago SOAR club, and Team JR
> AMA 592537LSF 7560 Level IV   R/C Soaring blog at 
> www.jimbacus.net
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


Re: [RCSE] OVSS...line break policy?

2005-05-16 Thread James V. Bacus
We have some very wise CD's in the OVSS, and I am not worried about this 
issue a bit.  Which ever way we go, it is the same for everyone.  Let's try 
to maximize the fun next weekend, I am really looking forward to flying 
with everybody.

At 07:58 PM 5/16/2005, Barry Andersen wrote:
Hey, the stakes are really high!!
Jim
Downers Grove, IL
Member of the Chicago SOAR club, and Team JR
AMA 592537LSF 7560 Level IV   R/C Soaring blog at www.jimbacus.net
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


RE: [RCSE] OVSS and Line Breaks

2005-05-16 Thread John
Jeff I agree that limited power winches would be a great thing, but it is
not practical for all club to get new winches. I don't understand why a week
link slows down a contest. In theory the weak link is the part that breaks
and almost all breaks will not be re-launched. When it is not the weak link
the only fair thing to do is re-launch because the line was damaged in the
first place and that is the cost of doing business.

John

-Original Message-
From: Jeff Steifel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 7:52 PM
To: John
Cc: RCSE
Subject: Re: [RCSE] OVSS and Line Breaks

I don't think a weak link works. You want to keep things moving a link
only serves to slow things down.

I think the FAI solution works great.  Limit the power on the winches.
The resistored winches cut the power down and then everyone is nearly
identical in power.
Now does this solve line breaks... somewhat... it certainly cuts it down
a considerable amount if  you lower the power and level the playing
field. But breaks will still happen especially on windy days.

In the ESL we noticed that new spools from Memphis twine had bad spots
in it. After clearing the breaks, the lines rarely broke. We don't
respool between contests any more, only when the line gets ragged. This
is consistent with my experience with my own clubs and also retriever
lines too.

3 years ago at the nats I hit the pedal and broke the line. before I got
any tension. Fortunately I got another winch. But the no relaunch policy
doesn't allow for bad  retrieves, or a previous bad launch. What about
someone who launches before you and pulls the knot to exterme. or
stresses the ring. The no relaunch doesn't work. BUT neither does
letting the person relaunch with all the markers in the air.
Either let them launch again or relight the group. If you let them
relight it must be point the plane to the ground and land... no dilly
dallying anyone caught slowing up for a reading of air should
forfeit their flight.


John wrote:

>Mark,
>
>Why not use a weak link of 225lb at the tow hook with 280-300 line on the
>winch? If the line breaks the weak link then they fly. You would need to be
>able to check the line quickly. That said. I feel that you are doing a
great
>job with the series and everyone knows the rules. Everyone launches under
>the same rules. They can choose to stay home if they don't like the
contest.
>You can't factor out all circumstances of launch problems. It is a roll of
>the dice. You pays you money and you takes you chances.
>
>John
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Marc Gellart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 6:04 PM
>To: soaring@airage.com
>Subject: [RCSE] OVSS and Line Breaks
>
>Jim, Paul, Jack,and Jim:
>Great comments and you all have pretty much sited all the pros and cons
>about what we face at each and every contest.  From what i know every one
of
>the contests we will be flying 280 or 290 line this year that is having MOM
>formats, I know STL relined this weekend and all the winches that are
coming
>are set up with the good stuff (actually one club event ona line I think
>eliminates the splices and they are even better then).  Like all have said,
>that eliminates nearly all the issues right there.
>   But, still what do we do?  I have had folks saying to me that I should
>mandate line strength and such, I have taken the attitude in the past that
>the clubs run their show and OVSS just uses the scores generated.  I
realize
>that my free market approach appaers a bit loose, but I still feel that
this
>approach is best since as has been pointed out that conditions can vary as
>well as equipment.  I urge clubs in the direction that I feel is what the
>customer wants, i.e. MVSA going MOM format this year with the heavier line
>than they have ever used before, there was trepidation, but they will make
>folks happy with the choice.
>My answer to what I will do in STL since I am the CD there is to give
>line breaks in the first round and to call down the entire flight group,
but
>after that the show is on and no more chances are available.  That is my
>answer, and it can be used as a template, but each club is on their own
with
>council from the wise among us.
>   My 2 cents on the subject...
>
>Marc
>RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and
>"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that
>subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with
>MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL
>are generally NOT in text format
>
>
>RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that
subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with
MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL
are generally NOT in text format
>
>
>
>
>

--
Jeff Steifel

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airp

Re: [RCSE] OVSS...line break policy?

2005-05-16 Thread Barry Andersen
Most all the OVSS winches now use the 290# line.  It is very hard to 
break.  When out practicing, or playing, I haven't broken a line in a 
couple of years.  I have broken lines at contests, including the NATS, 
I don't launch any differently there than normally, but the line at a 
contest is sometimes questionable, was crossed and dragged by the timer 
tapping down or a host of other mysteries that has caused it to be weak 
in just one small spot.

While I guess it's possible that guys might try to purposely break a 
line, it seems a stretch to me (pun intended), moreover, if the line is 
good, it's hard or maybe not possible to break.

When we stagger launches in seeded MOM, the high score is always 
launching first, the last guy always has a slight advantage,  even 
then, lift is not often apparent right off launch.

I suggest a time limit from first guy to last guy, maybe 2 minutes, but 
launch master uses his head
 If it's longer, you get bumped to the next round where it's tougher.  
If it's the last flight group, move fast.  More than one break, 
everybody comes down.  Seems like this is pretty much what we've been 
doing to date.

It really sucks to be penalized for a line break, particularly when 
nearly every time, it's a weak line that causes the break.  If someone 
has travelled a great distance to be essentially tossed out for a line 
break, it ain't so fun anymore.

There's enough dumb things I can do to blow a contest, purposeful line 
breaks aren't in my bag of tricks to find the air.  I don't believe 
that most pilots play that way; bad booga booga, not likely to really 
work, and might have the result Gordy got, and richly deserved,  if he 
was really playing that way.

We've done ok to date, seems to me.  I agree that we don't want to 
regulate the fun out of contests, but if I break a line, I expect a way 
to get in the air to fly, that flight group or the next.

Hey, the stakes are really high!!
My .02
Barry
On May 16, 2005, at 5:47 PM, pfsiegel wrote:
I would like to throw this topic out to the soaring exchange to see if 
there is any consensus of opinion on policy concerning  winch line 
breaks during launch, particularly during man on man competition.  
What would be a good standard policy for line breaks that could be 
universally adopted for a contest series like the OVSS?

Let's assume that there is an extra winch that is available for 
relaunch if a line break occurs.  If  during  launch  there is a line 
break during a mass launch or even during a slightly staggered launch, 
then an unfair advantage can be gained by the pilot who experienced 
the line break.  Before any subsequent relaunch from the extra winch 
during the same round, the delay in that relaunch could allow the 
pilot to observe the scatter of sailplanes already launched for any 
obvious areas of lift.

The obvious solution is to NOT allow any relaunch after a line break.  
This solution certainly discourages intentional line breakage by a 
pilot who is not happy with his launch or who just wants to be the 
last pilot to launch.
However, there is very real possibility that the line may have been 
weakened by a previous line cross during launch phase or even when the 
timer was "tapping down" the chute after a previous launch.  In this 
instance, the pilot who suffered the line break would be unfairly 
penalized for a problem that he was not responsible for.  This hardly 
seems fair, particularly for an unfortunate pilot who may have 
traveled a fair distance to compete over a full weekend of flying.
For better or worse, this no relaunch rule also discriminates against 
larger, heavier sailplanes.

One possible solution might be to automatically bump the pilot to the 
next flight group.  But what if this happens in the last flight group 
for the round?  Or, what if more than one line break happens in the 
same flight group and there is only one  extra winch?   Maybe a quick 
retrieve of an already been launched winch for the relaunch?

Should there be a time limit for when the relaunch must happen?  What 
would that time be?  Or should this be at the discretion of the launch 
master?

It sure slows down a contest to have everyone land for a mass relaunch 
which makes that an unpopular solution.

What about a compromise to allow one line break per day, with the 
provision that in the opinion of the launch master that there has not 
been an intentional attempt to break the line?

Or???


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send 
"subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in 
text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based 
email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIM

Re: [RCSE] OVSS and Line Breaks

2005-05-16 Thread Jeff Steifel
I don't think a weak link works. You want to keep things moving a link 
only serves to slow things down.

I think the FAI solution works great.  Limit the power on the winches. 
The resistored winches cut the power down and then everyone is nearly 
identical in power.
Now does this solve line breaks... somewhat... it certainly cuts it down 
a considerable amount if  you lower the power and level the playing 
field. But breaks will still happen especially on windy days.

In the ESL we noticed that new spools from Memphis twine had bad spots 
in it. After clearing the breaks, the lines rarely broke. We don't 
respool between contests any more, only when the line gets ragged. This 
is consistent with my experience with my own clubs and also retriever 
lines too.

3 years ago at the nats I hit the pedal and broke the line. before I got 
any tension. Fortunately I got another winch. But the no relaunch policy 
doesn't allow for bad  retrieves, or a previous bad launch. What about 
someone who launches before you and pulls the knot to exterme. or 
stresses the ring. The no relaunch doesn't work. BUT neither does  
letting the person relaunch with all the markers in the air.
Either let them launch again or relight the group. If you let them 
relight it must be point the plane to the ground and land... no dilly 
dallying anyone caught slowing up for a reading of air should 
forfeit their flight.

John wrote:
Mark,
Why not use a weak link of 225lb at the tow hook with 280-300 line on the
winch? If the line breaks the weak link then they fly. You would need to be
able to check the line quickly. That said. I feel that you are doing a great
job with the series and everyone knows the rules. Everyone launches under
the same rules. They can choose to stay home if they don't like the contest.
You can't factor out all circumstances of launch problems. It is a roll of
the dice. You pays you money and you takes you chances.
John
-Original Message-
From: Marc Gellart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 6:04 PM
To: soaring@airage.com
Subject: [RCSE] OVSS and Line Breaks
Jim, Paul, Jack,and Jim:
   Great comments and you all have pretty much sited all the pros and cons
about what we face at each and every contest.  From what i know every one of
the contests we will be flying 280 or 290 line this year that is having MOM
formats, I know STL relined this weekend and all the winches that are coming
are set up with the good stuff (actually one club event ona line I think
eliminates the splices and they are even better then).  Like all have said,
that eliminates nearly all the issues right there.
  But, still what do we do?  I have had folks saying to me that I should
mandate line strength and such, I have taken the attitude in the past that
the clubs run their show and OVSS just uses the scores generated.  I realize
that my free market approach appaers a bit loose, but I still feel that this
approach is best since as has been pointed out that conditions can vary as
well as equipment.  I urge clubs in the direction that I feel is what the
customer wants, i.e. MVSA going MOM format this year with the heavier line
than they have ever used before, there was trepidation, but they will make
folks happy with the choice.
   My answer to what I will do in STL since I am the CD there is to give
line breaks in the first round and to call down the entire flight group, but
after that the show is on and no more chances are available.  That is my
answer, and it can be used as a template, but each club is on their own with
council from the wise among us.
  My 2 cents on the subject...
Marc
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that
subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with
MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL
are generally NOT in text format
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format

 

--
Jeff Steifel
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


[RCSE] Wax those screws

2005-05-16 Thread Jeff Steifel
I bought a used extreme the other day. I noticed I had the problem with 
the wing bolts starting to form that we discussed on the forum the other 
day.

, I originally hit them with oil ... but today  I thought about it and 
decided to use wax instead. In biking the best chain lube is not a spray 
on it is a hot wax dip. Why? because it doesn't fling off AND it doesn't 
attract dirt. I drop my screws at least twice a season. I wouldn't want 
to deal with cleaning the dirt off. With wax it is less likely to 
collect dirt.

Just take a candle and rub the screw threads on the wax and install. The 
wax will lubricate the threads and you won't have the wet screws to deal 
with.

The wax is good for installing servo screws too. I made new 
reinforcement plates for the servos and drilled the screw holes a little 
undersized. I lubed the screws with wax to drive them in. They go in 
much easier.

This HOT tip of the day brought to you by the makers of  candles 
everywhere... 8>)

--
Jeff Steifel
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] Vision Transmitter

2005-05-16 Thread lomcovak
I have a couple of students who would be very interested in any NIB Visons that 
may be kicking around out there. Unlikey, but who knows. Anyone? 

Quoting Bill Swingle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> Wow, a vision in good shape for 150$.
> 
> The vision used to command ~250$. Now they're down to 150$. Well, I guess
> nothing is forever.
> 
> Bill Swingle
> 
> 
> 
> RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and
> "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that
> subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME
> turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are
> generally NOT in text format
> 


Simon Van Leeuwen
PnP Systems - The E-Harness of Choice
Radius Systems
Cogito Ergo Zoom

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


RE: [RCSE] OVSS and Line Breaks

2005-05-16 Thread John
Mark,

Why not use a weak link of 225lb at the tow hook with 280-300 line on the
winch? If the line breaks the weak link then they fly. You would need to be
able to check the line quickly. That said. I feel that you are doing a great
job with the series and everyone knows the rules. Everyone launches under
the same rules. They can choose to stay home if they don't like the contest.
You can't factor out all circumstances of launch problems. It is a roll of
the dice. You pays you money and you takes you chances.

John

-Original Message-
From: Marc Gellart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 6:04 PM
To: soaring@airage.com
Subject: [RCSE] OVSS and Line Breaks

Jim, Paul, Jack,and Jim:
Great comments and you all have pretty much sited all the pros and cons
about what we face at each and every contest.  From what i know every one of
the contests we will be flying 280 or 290 line this year that is having MOM
formats, I know STL relined this weekend and all the winches that are coming
are set up with the good stuff (actually one club event ona line I think
eliminates the splices and they are even better then).  Like all have said,
that eliminates nearly all the issues right there.
   But, still what do we do?  I have had folks saying to me that I should
mandate line strength and such, I have taken the attitude in the past that
the clubs run their show and OVSS just uses the scores generated.  I realize
that my free market approach appaers a bit loose, but I still feel that this
approach is best since as has been pointed out that conditions can vary as
well as equipment.  I urge clubs in the direction that I feel is what the
customer wants, i.e. MVSA going MOM format this year with the heavier line
than they have ever used before, there was trepidation, but they will make
folks happy with the choice.
My answer to what I will do in STL since I am the CD there is to give
line breaks in the first round and to call down the entire flight group, but
after that the show is on and no more chances are available.  That is my
answer, and it can be used as a template, but each club is on their own with
council from the wise among us.
   My 2 cents on the subject...

Marc
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that
subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with
MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL
are generally NOT in text format


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


[RCSE] For Sale: Hacker Motor & Batteries or how to power an AVA-E

2005-05-16 Thread Joe Nave
FOR SALE

2 Zapped, Kapton-wrapped 12-cell Sanyo CP1700SCR NiCd packs.  Less than 1 
year old, originally paid $84/pack.  Selling for $60/pack.

See http://www.rcsoaring.com/forsale/battery.jpg
Hacker B50 LMR Carbon (7-10 cells) w/6.7:1 gear box and Hacker Master 125 O 
F5F controller
(6-16 cells, 2-5 LiPo, 5-24V).   Paid $568, selling for $450.

See http://www.rcsoaring.com/forsale/motor.jpg
Includes shipping to CONUS.
This setup will take an AVA-E (at ~60oz) vertical at ~4,000ft/min.
Please contact me if you have any questions: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks,
Joe
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


[RCSE] test

2005-05-16 Thread Stan Myers
.
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] OVSS...line break policy?

2005-05-16 Thread JDIRRS
I have gathered the data and present the followingFor what it's worth.

Most contest start at 9:00 am (AT BEST) in an effort to increase readiness
and decrease line breaks  Contestants should be allowed to register and have
a  3 min. MAX test flight; recorded on the score card less points. (timer
must retrieve the line during the flight..It takes about that long to go
get the chute an walk back) This flight would not be your god given
rightthe window would be open from 8:15 to 8:45 (sorry about your luck
1st come 1st serve)
In lieu of this semi impractical thought given socialization the night
before and pressing the "VOLUNTEERS" we move on.

Round one:  Bring em all down
Two-final : I like Jims suggestion of reverse order with the broken line
moving up.
finals: (like a track meet) you get one free the other you fly out. bring em
down till we get a fair launch.(two breaks total for the contest)

I have little pity for line breaks. This is a game/sport/event of assessing
conditions and abilities.One of the better lessons I got from my mentor and
bud Capt. Jack was a an afternoon where I pinched the tow ring between my
fingers and learned how to tap the pedal with out the ring being pull from
my fingers.A GRASSHOPPER
If you got the biggest plane the heaviest foot you better be ready to max
out from 75 ft.(it's all part of the game,how much ballast,wind)

In (your) shorts.If you want to get the maxx launch bring your
BALLS to the line and blame no one but yourself when you gotta come fly with
me in the Fisher Price group..

P.S. The BBQ for Nats looks better than ever.

- Original Message - 
From: "James V. Bacus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Soaring" 
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 6:23 PM
Subject: Re: [RCSE] OVSS...line break policy?


> That is the way it is traditionally done in the OVSS, but where you are
> most likely to see line break action is in the last group with the
> strongest pilots, and that round is always filled so there will never be
an
> empty slot to allow someone in.
>
> Chicago SOAR always restrings its winches with fresh #290 before a OVSS
> weekend.
>
>
> At 05:18 PM 5/16/2005, Jim Monaco wrote:
> >I suggest that the order of the groups for seeded MOM send the lower
> >seeds up first, then if a flight is delayed you get a tougher group
rather
> >than
> >an "easier" group.
>
> Jim
> Downers Grove, IL
> Member of the Chicago SOAR club, and Team JR
> AMA 592537LSF 7560 Level IV   R/C Soaring blog at www.jimbacus.net
>
> RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe"
and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that
subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with
MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL
are generally NOT in text format

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


Re: [RCSE] OVSS...line break policy?

2005-05-16 Thread Jack Strother


Oh Gord Mister,
Granted, I do not travel in the exalted circles that you travel, 
BUT I Have Seen, and so have a few others concerned with this subject,
watch the Late launcher / re lighter on purpose, walk away with the win
after an opps "LINE Break", ...It Has happened, maybe not
within the OVSS, then again maybe so...
Do not ask me who, do not ask me when, just know that it has happened,
and it was apparent. 
Thanks for sharing your war stories, I enjoy them
Obviously, its a skill not to develope
Mark Has the right idea, I will wait and see form whence it goes..
J
At 06:11 PM 5/16/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Complete relauch is the fairest,
but any relight works.  competitive edge hasn't ever proven to have
caused a win. 
 
Complete relaunch is the fairest, but in fact a single relaunch has
never ever resulted in the relauncher winning  a contest.
 
There's been plenty of chat about its 'possibility' or 'potential' but
the reality is unless you know some one who is a crook that we fly with a
lot, no one would bother to break a line for some advantage. 

It could be done doesn't mean it will be done.
 
I was leading a contest recently in Australia, broke a line, relite and
that line broke.  My intention was to seal the deal by tricking them
into finding the air for me that I had managed to find all daybut I
was hoist by my own petard. :-)
 
If the contest has a no pop off or no line break rule, I ain't driv'n
:-)
I go to fly :-)
Gordy

Jack Strother
Granger, IN
LSF V #117
//home.comcast.net/~strotherbj




Re: [RCSE] OVSS...line break policy?

2005-05-16 Thread gordysoar

Complete relauch is the fairest, but any relight works.  competitive edge hasn't ever proven to have caused a win. 
 
Complete relaunch is the fairest, but in fact a single relaunch has never ever resulted in the relauncher winning  a contest.
 
There's been plenty of chat about its 'possibility' or 'potential' but the reality is unless you know some one who is a crook that we fly with a lot, no one would bother to break a line for some advantage.  
It could be done doesn't mean it will be done.
 
I was leading a contest recently in Australia, broke a line, relite and that line broke.  My intention was to seal the deal by tricking them into finding the air for me that I had managed to find all daybut I was hoist by my own petard. :-)
 
If the contest has a no pop off or no line break rule, I ain't driv'n :-)
I go to fly :-)
Gordy


Re: [RCSE] OVSS...line break policy?

2005-05-16 Thread James V. Bacus
At 04:47 PM 5/16/2005, pfsiegel wrote:
What about a compromise to allow one line break per day, with the 
provision that in the opinion of the launch master that there has not been 
an intentional attempt to break the line?

Or???
Here's another compromise that I thought about at one time, but never 
posted.  I may have talked to TK about it on one of our many car trips to 
or from an OVSS contest.  (although I really hate mentioning this stuff one 
week before the series.  Better off discussed post series, and perhaps 
limited to the OVSS yahoo group with the guys who fly the series.)

Allow one line break a day.
Additional line breaks in future rounds are allowed a re-launch, but cost 
you 30 seconds off the task time for the round.

More than two line breaks in a flight group, the entire group has to 
relaunch, but those line breaks count and penalties are applied if 
applicable for those pilots (i.e. it wasn't their first one).

If a pilot breaks the line on the relaunch, the flight counts and the 30 
second penalty is applied.

Just a suggestion.
Jim
Downers Grove, IL
Member of the Chicago SOAR club, and Team JR
AMA 592537LSF 7560 Level IV   R/C Soaring blog at www.jimbacus.net
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


[RCSE] OVSS and Line Breaks

2005-05-16 Thread Marc Gellart
Jim, Paul, Jack,and Jim:
Great comments and you all have pretty much sited all the pros and cons 
about what we face at each and every contest.  From what i know every one of 
the contests we will be flying 280 or 290 line this year that is having MOM 
formats, I know STL relined this weekend and all the winches that are coming 
are set up with the good stuff (actually one club event ona line I think 
eliminates the splices and they are even better then).  Like all have said, 
that eliminates nearly all the issues right there.  
   But, still what do we do?  I have had folks saying to me that I should 
mandate line strength and such, I have taken the attitude in the past that the 
clubs run their show and OVSS just uses the scores generated.  I realize that 
my free market approach appaers a bit loose, but I still feel that this 
approach is best since as has been pointed out that conditions can vary as well 
as equipment.  I urge clubs in the direction that I feel is what the customer 
wants, i.e. MVSA going MOM format this year with the heavier line than they 
have ever used before, there was trepidation, but they will make folks happy 
with the choice.
My answer to what I will do in STL since I am the CD there is to give line 
breaks in the first round and to call down the entire flight group, but after 
that the show is on and no more chances are available.  That is my answer, and 
it can be used as a template, but each club is on their own with council from 
the wise among us.
   My 2 cents on the subject...

Marc
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


Re: [RCSE] OVSS...line break policy?

2005-05-16 Thread Jack Iafret
Normally, I kind of keep to the back of the tree line but this is one
of my few hot buttons-launching systems.

FAI has a method, not good for us.

I have proposed for years that we in AMA scheduled TD events use a
winch system with some kind of limit device (sensor) other than the
winch line. It could be motor current, it could be line tension, it
could be power/second used or a bunch of combinations.

Just so I don't ramble any more (I think you get the idea), if the
winch system limited some parameter that kept the line from breaking
under tension, then all line breaks belong to the club, not the pilot.
This could then always be a relight for the group and no need for
backup winches.

I think all of our equipment would last a lot longer, both launch and
flying equipment. Although this is not a prime concern to the
competition minded, it could help those in the sportsman classes as
well as the club treasury. Mike Wade does our winches as a club member
but we still have to pay him for his trouble just like anyone else. I
am not sure what the cost is/winch/year but my guess is we could have
a couple more winches by now making MOM with club winches easier.

With todays electronics, a controller should be able to be done for a
reasonable amount (I think reasonable would be under $150-200).

Making some noise 

Wadayathink?

On 5/16/05, pfsiegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to throw this topic out to the soaring exchange to see if
> there is any consensus of opinion on policy concerning  winch line
> breaks during launch, particularly during man on man competition.  What
> would be a good standard policy for line breaks that could be
> universally adopted for a contest series like the OVSS?
> 
> Let's assume that there is an extra winch that is available for relaunch
> if a line break occurs.  If  during  launch  there is a line break
> during a mass launch or even during a slightly staggered launch, then an
> unfair advantage can be gained by the pilot who experienced the line
> break.  Before any subsequent relaunch from the extra winch during the
> same round, the delay in that relaunch could allow the pilot to observe
> the scatter of sailplanes already launched for any obvious areas of lift.
> 
> The obvious solution is to NOT allow any relaunch after a line break.
> This solution certainly discourages intentional line breakage by a pilot
> who is not happy with his launch or who just wants to be the last pilot
> to launch.
> 
> However, there is very real possibility that the line may have been
> weakened by a previous line cross during launch phase or even when the
> timer was "tapping down" the chute after a previous launch.  In this
> instance, the pilot who suffered the line break would be unfairly
> penalized for a problem that he was not responsible for.  This hardly
> seems fair, particularly for an unfortunate pilot who may have traveled
> a fair distance to compete over a full weekend of flying.
> 
>  For better or worse, this no relaunch rule also discriminates against
> larger, heavier sailplanes.
> 
> One possible solution might be to automatically bump the pilot to the
> next flight group.  But what if this happens in the last flight group
> for the round?  Or, what if more than one line break happens in the same
> flight group and there is only one  extra winch?   Maybe a quick
> retrieve of an already been launched winch for the relaunch?
> 
> Should there be a time limit for when the relaunch must happen?  What
> would that time be?  Or should this be at the discretion of the launch
> master?
> 
> It sure slows down a contest to have everyone land for a mass relaunch
> which makes that an unpopular solution.
> 
> What about a compromise to allow one line break per day, with the
> provision that in the opinion of the launch master that there has not
> been an intentional attempt to break the line?
> 
> Or???
> 
> RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
> "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
> unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
> Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
> text format
> 


-- 
Jack Iafret
Home and Hobbies Acc't.
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


RE: [RCSE] "I found a new glue at Toledo and you didn't!"

2005-05-16 Thread Barrett Stridiron
Looks interesting.

Use phone number 123-456-7890 to browse their store without registering.


 -==- Barrett


-Original Message-
From: Bob Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 6:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; soaring@airage.com
Subject: RE: [RCSE] "I found a new glue at Toledo and you didn't!"


 
It has the best features of the glues we are currently using and I just had
an opportunity or misfortune to try it on a damage molded wing tip. 

This stuff let  you move stuff around till you are satisfied then lets you
harden it immediately. You can put filler in it too.  Stting in the jug it
seems expensive but considering it has a shelf life supposedly 10times that
of CA and its versatility...cheap.
 
I'll be reviewing it in RCSD in a coming issue, just waiting on specs etc.  

How much do I like it?  I just ordered $300 worth.
 
Hey Gordy,
 
The miracle glue you found at Toledo wouldn't happen to be CoolChem?
 
www.coolchem.com
 
Regards,
Bob Johnson
Fond du Lac, WI
 


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


Re: [RCSE] Switch Harness Problem

2005-05-16 Thread James V. Bacus
Sorry about your misfortune, but you have a great attitude and I look 
forward to flying with you in Cinci.


At 05:04 PM 5/16/2005, Glauco Lago wrote:
Anyway I'll be there
with the Organic so beware of a 2 m and flying as master now ;-)
Jim
Downers Grove, IL
Member of the Chicago SOAR club, and Team JR
AMA 592537LSF 7560 Level IV   R/C Soaring blog at www.jimbacus.net
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] OVSS...line break policy?

2005-05-16 Thread James V. Bacus
That is the way it is traditionally done in the OVSS, but where you are 
most likely to see line break action is in the last group with the 
strongest pilots, and that round is always filled so there will never be an 
empty slot to allow someone in.

Chicago SOAR always restrings its winches with fresh #290 before a OVSS 
weekend.

At 05:18 PM 5/16/2005, Jim Monaco wrote:
I suggest that the order of the groups for seeded MOM send the lower
seeds up first, then if a flight is delayed you get a tougher group rather 
than
an "easier" group.
Jim
Downers Grove, IL
Member of the Chicago SOAR club, and Team JR
AMA 592537LSF 7560 Level IV   R/C Soaring blog at www.jimbacus.net
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] OVSS...line break policy?

2005-05-16 Thread Jim Monaco
Paul - In RMSA we fly all our contests as random MoM - not seeded.  The rules
are:
1. If the line break occurs to a novice they are allowed to relite on a free
winch for the same round.  While there might be an advantage, novices are not
generally capable of using that advantage successfully.
2. For Sportsman or Masters, the pilot will be scheduled into the next
available flight group (checking frequencies of course).
3. If there are no free slots available in a subsequent group (perhaps other
pilots had breaks too and filled the slots or frequency conflicts) then we
bring them down and refly the group.
4.  For breaks in the last group of a round they are always brought down for a
relaunch (if masters or sportsman).

Generally bringing them down is not too much of a time hit if you do it
promptly.

We had much debate about relaunching in the same group and for the more
seasoned competitors we felt it was too much of an advantage.  When flying
seeded MOM there will be the question of breaking the line to get into a later
group.  I suggest that the order of the groups for seeded MOM send the lower
seeds up first, then if a flight is delayed you get a tougher group rather than
an "easier" group.

We use 290# braided and have very few line breaks so it is not really a big
deal in practice.

Hope this helps..
Jim Monaco
Rocky Mountain Soaring Association
Denver


--- pfsiegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to throw this topic out to the soaring exchange to see if 
> there is any consensus of opinion on policy concerning  winch line 
> breaks during launch, particularly during man on man competition.  What 
> would be a good standard policy for line breaks that could be 
> universally adopted for a contest series like the OVSS?
> 
> Let's assume that there is an extra winch that is available for relaunch 
> if a line break occurs.  If  during  launch  there is a line break 
> during a mass launch or even during a slightly staggered launch, then an 
> unfair advantage can be gained by the pilot who experienced the line 
> break.  Before any subsequent relaunch from the extra winch during the 
> same round, the delay in that relaunch could allow the pilot to observe 
> the scatter of sailplanes already launched for any obvious areas of lift.
> 
> The obvious solution is to NOT allow any relaunch after a line break.  
> This solution certainly discourages intentional line breakage by a pilot 
> who is not happy with his launch or who just wants to be the last pilot 
> to launch.  
> 
> However, there is very real possibility that the line may have been 
> weakened by a previous line cross during launch phase or even when the 
> timer was "tapping down" the chute after a previous launch.  In this 
> instance, the pilot who suffered the line break would be unfairly 
> penalized for a problem that he was not responsible for.  This hardly 
> seems fair, particularly for an unfortunate pilot who may have traveled 
> a fair distance to compete over a full weekend of flying. 
> 
>  For better or worse, this no relaunch rule also discriminates against 
> larger, heavier sailplanes.
> 
> One possible solution might be to automatically bump the pilot to the 
> next flight group.  But what if this happens in the last flight group 
> for the round?  Or, what if more than one line break happens in the same 
> flight group and there is only one  extra winch?   Maybe a quick 
> retrieve of an already been launched winch for the relaunch?
> 
> Should there be a time limit for when the relaunch must happen?  What 
> would that time be?  Or should this be at the discretion of the launch 
> master?
> 
> It sure slows down a contest to have everyone land for a mass relaunch 
> which makes that an unpopular solution.
> 
> What about a compromise to allow one line break per day, with the 
> provision that in the opinion of the launch master that there has not 
> been an intentional attempt to break the line?
> 
> Or???
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and
> "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that
> subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME
> turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are
> generally NOT in text format
> 
> 

   DeleteReplyForwardMove... 
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


RE: [RCSE] "I found a new glue at Toledo and you didn't!"

2005-05-16 Thread Bob Johnson








 



It has the best features of the glues we
are currently using and I just had an opportunity or misfortune to try it on a
damage molded wing tip. 






This stuff let  you move stuff around till you are satisfied then lets you
harden it immediately. You can put filler in it too.  Stting in the jug it
seems expensive but considering it has a shelf life supposedly 10times that of
CA and its versatility...cheap.





 





I'll be reviewing it in RCSD in a coming
issue, just waiting on specs etc.  






How much do I like it?  I just ordered $300 worth.





 





Hey Gordy,

 

The miracle glue you found at Toledo wouldn’t
happen to be CoolChem?

 

www.coolchem.com

 

Regards,

Bob Johnson

Fond du Lac, WI





 










Re: [RCSE] OVSS...line break policy?

2005-05-16 Thread Jack Strother
Paul,
I too am somewhat dismayed.
Whatever answer that is brought forth, someone will surely feel slighted.
I too do not like the unfair, 2 minutes later relight, for the very 
reason  that you state.
I also do not like the low launch rule, especially, as you say, and I have 
seen, it was not the launching pilots error, but a line improperly 
retrieved; wrapped around the turn around, or even better, the turn around 
threaded backwards !!!

Those of us who fly the larger airplanes are often held hostage, if you 
will, to the sponsoring clubs version of heavy line... whatever that might 
be. There is no standard called out, but I try to run 280lb on my winch, 
with few if any line breaks.

Line condition, grass condition , wet / dry / new / last years or even 
worse " It looks new line ", also impacts the competitive edge.

Let us not forget as well, not matter how hard we try, basically none of 
the winches at these MOM contests are truly matched, if they even look the 
same, we should consider ourselves lucky. Differences in brakes, brake 
hookups, Brake type for that matter, are usually different.

I for one think that it is more appropriate to call them all down, "IF" the 
launch director determines a malfunction within "X" seconds, that not of 
the launching pilot,
HOWEVER, Like you say, it tends to lead to a long contest day, and all it 
takes is one person to be the .. aahhPerp !!

Great Question, I am interested in the outcome, but be fore warned, if we 
are not careful we could regulate ourselves outta the fun this is supposed 
to be..

Actually this needed to be covered last fall, during the planning phase for 
this year...
8-)
Jack


At 04:47 PM 5/16/2005, pfsiegel wrote:
I would like to throw this topic out to the soaring exchange to see if 
there is any consensus of opinion on policy concerning  winch line breaks 
during launch, particularly during man on man competition.  What would be 
a good standard policy for line breaks that could be universally adopted 
for a contest series like the OVSS?

Let's assume that there is an extra winch that is available for relaunch 
if a line break occurs.  If  during  launch  there is a line break during 
a mass launch or even during a slightly staggered launch, then an unfair 
advantage can be gained by the pilot who experienced the line 
break.  Before any subsequent relaunch from the extra winch during the 
same round, the delay in that relaunch could allow the pilot to observe 
the scatter of sailplanes already launched for any obvious areas of lift.

The obvious solution is to NOT allow any relaunch after a line break.
This solution certainly discourages intentional line breakage by a pilot 
who is not happy with his launch or who just wants to be the last pilot to 
launch.

However, there is very real possibility that the line may have been 
weakened by a previous line cross during launch phase or even when the 
timer was "tapping down" the chute after a previous launch.  In this 
instance, the pilot who suffered the line break would be unfairly 
penalized for a problem that he was not responsible for.  This hardly 
seems fair, particularly for an unfortunate pilot who may have traveled a 
fair distance to compete over a full weekend of flying.
For better or worse, this no relaunch rule also discriminates against 
larger, heavier sailplanes.

One possible solution might be to automatically bump the pilot to the next 
flight group.  But what if this happens in the last flight group for the 
round?  Or, what if more than one line break happens in the same flight 
group and there is only one  extra winch?   Maybe a quick retrieve of an 
already been launched winch for the relaunch?

Should there be a time limit for when the relaunch must happen?  What 
would that time be?  Or should this be at the discretion of the launch master?

It sure slows down a contest to have everyone land for a mass relaunch 
which makes that an unpopular solution.

What about a compromise to allow one line break per day, with the 
provision that in the opinion of the launch master that there has not been 
an intentional attempt to break the line?

Or???


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" 
and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note 
that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format 
with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and 
AOL are generally NOT in text format
Jack Strother
Granger, IN
LSF V #117
//home.comcast.net/~strotherbj

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


[RCSE] Switch Harness Problem

2005-05-16 Thread Glauco Lago
Guys,

My beloved Artemis got to the end of his soaring life this weekend at
a club contest after what appears to be a switch harness failure.

I'll describe what happened and see if someone can help me.

The plane was a V tail Artemis with 6 x 368 JR servos, JR 770 PCM
receiver, 1750 mAh 4 cell NiCad pack from Servocity and was ballasted
with  8oz bringing the total weight to 76 oz.

We were flying a MOM contest with brand new 290 line, brand new 12 V
deep cycle batteries and new injoy 6 volt motors on real balls (as
powerful as it can get :-). The wind was 10 to 15 miles.

First launch went ok and I maxed it (10 m) and blew the landing. On
the second launch at the mid of the launch the plane started to spiral
down like if something was hanging on the plane (no retrievers) but it
released from the line from about 100 ft and kept flying like if
nothing happened. I even did some circles and got some landing points.
I then checked all that I could on that specific winch and in the
plane. All servos moved, had good range check, the charge on the
battery was good so decided to fly the last round.
On this launch the plane veered slightly left and popped off at 50 ft.
After that I had no radio control and it spiraled down to earth.

Inspecting the wreckage I could see the servos were not moving with
radio inputs. The first thing I noticed was the switch harness quit
working. When I plugged the battery directly to the radio everything
worked fine.

So at home after checking the wiring on the switch harness here is a
link to a picture of what I found

http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=371701#post3758917

Apparently the circuit board blew like if it was a short but I don't
know how that could happen. The plastic case has no marks.
I don't know the brand of the harness but it had the Futaba J plugs so
it could be Futaba original or maybe Hitec.

So my question is could the current load on launch blow the harness? 
I've heard it could get to several amps on launch and I don't know how
these harness' are rated.
Maybe it got a weak spot on the first troubled launch but still worked
without the launch loads and at the last launch it blew like a fuse.
Any other theory?

I can see the guys that will be in Cincinnati next weekend are all
happy (Gordy being one of them) since they won't have to fly against
the plane that won the 04 OVSS sportsman class. Anyway I'll be there
with the Organic so beware of a 2 m and flying as master now ;-)

Glauco
MVSA
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


[RCSE] OVSS...line break policy?

2005-05-16 Thread pfsiegel
I would like to throw this topic out to the soaring exchange to see if 
there is any consensus of opinion on policy concerning  winch line 
breaks during launch, particularly during man on man competition.  What 
would be a good standard policy for line breaks that could be 
universally adopted for a contest series like the OVSS?

Let's assume that there is an extra winch that is available for relaunch 
if a line break occurs.  If  during  launch  there is a line break 
during a mass launch or even during a slightly staggered launch, then an 
unfair advantage can be gained by the pilot who experienced the line 
break.  Before any subsequent relaunch from the extra winch during the 
same round, the delay in that relaunch could allow the pilot to observe 
the scatter of sailplanes already launched for any obvious areas of lift.

The obvious solution is to NOT allow any relaunch after a line break.  
This solution certainly discourages intentional line breakage by a pilot 
who is not happy with his launch or who just wants to be the last pilot 
to launch.  

However, there is very real possibility that the line may have been 
weakened by a previous line cross during launch phase or even when the 
timer was "tapping down" the chute after a previous launch.  In this 
instance, the pilot who suffered the line break would be unfairly 
penalized for a problem that he was not responsible for.  This hardly 
seems fair, particularly for an unfortunate pilot who may have traveled 
a fair distance to compete over a full weekend of flying. 

For better or worse, this no relaunch rule also discriminates against 
larger, heavier sailplanes.

One possible solution might be to automatically bump the pilot to the 
next flight group.  But what if this happens in the last flight group 
for the round?  Or, what if more than one line break happens in the same 
flight group and there is only one  extra winch?   Maybe a quick 
retrieve of an already been launched winch for the relaunch?

Should there be a time limit for when the relaunch must happen?  What 
would that time be?  Or should this be at the discretion of the launch 
master?

It sure slows down a contest to have everyone land for a mass relaunch 
which makes that an unpopular solution.

What about a compromise to allow one line break per day, with the 
provision that in the opinion of the launch master that there has not 
been an intentional attempt to break the line?

Or???


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


[RCSE] this is a test

2005-05-16 Thread Pemurr75



 


Re: [RCSE] Vision Transmitter

2005-05-16 Thread Bill Swingle
Wow, a vision in good shape for 150$.

The vision used to command ~250$. Now they're down to 150$. Well, I guess
nothing is forever.

Bill Swingle



RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


Re: [RCSE] spring fling

2005-05-16 Thread Mike Smith
I am going to try and rip that thing from your cold, dying? hands.  I'll 
bet your hands will be pretty darn alive everytime there is a buck on the 
line for the landing.

Sure hope they have that bonus zone for when you really screw up ;^)   I 
liked that one last time.

See you there.
Mike

At 07:56 AM 5/14/2005, Daryl Perkins wrote:
Hey guys,
I was just on the SVSS website signing up for the
Spring Fling. Hello.. where is everybody?
Looks like a fun format - lots of flying, challenging
tasks, and a great group of guys. Besides, I'll be
there... who wants to miss that ;-)
Go here for more info -   www.svss.org
By the way, there has been a small group of volunteers
who have resurrected the Triad trophy. The Triad, for
those who don't know, was awarded to the top scoring
pilot through three Southwest based contests for the
year - AZ (South West Classic), The RoseBowl 2 Day
(Don't recall the name) and Visalia. With the death of
PSS, the Triad got kinda lost. A few clubs tried to
resurrect it, but it never really stuck. I carried the
trophy around for awhile, but it was so ugly I never
bothered to have my name put on it. (It's a prepetual
trophy) I finally stuck it in the trailer in Visalia
and ran ;-) But now... a new and improved Triad
resurfaces
The Spring Fling will make up the second leg this
year.
It's the type of title that means a lot to a true
competitor. To have won a single contest is nice, but
to have bested the top soaring pilots in the West over
25-30 flights over 6 days of flying, in varying
conditions, varying landing tasks is pretty
meaningful. It always meant a lot to me. It was a
shame to see it die.
If you scored well in AZ, better get your butt up to
Sac-O-Potatoes June 25 and 26 and kick some butt. I've
seen some ideas regarding the new trophy, and
whichever way they go, it'll be a must have. I know
I'll be working hard for it.
So everybody come on up to the Spring Fling. Support
SVSS. Support the Triad. Somebody's gotta win this
thing. Might as well be you. But, of course, you'll
have to pry it from my cold dying hands. ;-)
D

Yahoo! Mail
Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour:
http://tour.mail.yahoo.com/mailtour.html
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" 
and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note 
that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format 
with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and 
AOL are generally NOT in text format

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


[RCSE] Fw: Vision Transmitter

2005-05-16 Thread Brian Smith
Sent this yesterday and I didn't see it come up..If you get a double I
apologize..Brian
--


 Subject: Vision Transmitter


Any one looking for a good Vision transmitter?
 This has been my everyday flyer...It was sent in for a check up this past
 winter...I consider it in Good Condition...All switches intact, works
 perfect in every way..Very trust worthy. Latest software for the 8SP
 version..Has nearly new 1100 nicad pack..I Can put it on ch 16, ch 20 or
ham
 ch 7 for anyone interestedThe only down grade on it is a loose door
 hinge on the right side..The door is intact and works perfect.. I just
picked up two new Visions and just can't see this just sitting in my
cupboard.. Like to have $150 and 1/2 the shipping.. I will gladly refund
your money if not
 pleased..Will bring it to Cincy next Sat if anyone would like to see
 it...Or have it here the 28th and 29th at the Tullahoma Contest..Thanks for
the BW..Brian Smith


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


[RCSE] Fw: Jim Bag

2005-05-16 Thread Brian Smith

Subject: Jim Bag


 Went to MG..Thanks..Brian




RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


Re: [RCSE] GOT my new Frequency Checker today!

2005-05-16 Thread Jack Strother


I got a notification that Tower has shipped mine, should be here in the
next day or two.
giddy with excitement..
CJ

At 12:20 PM 5/16/2005, Brian Chan wrote:
At 12:53 PM -0400 5/16/05,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WoW its smaller
than I remembered. About the size of two Hitec 8 channel RX's...
Easily fits in a shirt pocket!
GordyGordy,
Then I should be getting my soon... did you get the external
antenna?

Brian

-- 

--
* Brian Chan,
* AFDD Instrumentation Group, US Army Research Support
* Ames Research Center, Mail Stop-215-2,
* Bldg 215 Room 120
* Moffett Field, CA
94035-1000   

* 650-604-0389 FAX 650-604-5173
* e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   

-

Jack Strother
Granger, IN
LSF V #117
//home.comcast.net/~strotherbj




Re: [RCSE] GOT my new Frequency Checker today!

2005-05-16 Thread Brian Chan
Title: Re: [RCSE] GOT my new Frequency Checker
today!


At 12:53 PM -0400 5/16/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WoW its
smaller than I remembered. About the size of two Hitec 8 channel
RX's...
Easily
fits in a shirt pocket!

Gordy
Gordy,

Then I should be getting my soon... did you get the external
antenna?


Brian

-- 

--
* Brian
Chan,
* AFDD Instrumentation Group, US Army
Research Support
* Ames Research Center, Mail
Stop-215-2,
* Bldg 215 Room 120
* Moffett Field, CA
94035-1000
* 650-604-0389 FAX
650-604-5173
* e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   
-



[RCSE] PS, Freq Checker

2005-05-16 Thread GordySoar



It uses 3 AAA cells.
Gordy


[RCSE] GOT my new Frequency Checker today!

2005-05-16 Thread GordySoar



WoW its smaller than I remembered. About the size of two Hitec 8 channel 
RX's...
Easily fits in a shirt pocket!
Gordy


Re: [RCSE] "I pity the fool didn't get some LSF Tasks done today!"

2005-05-16 Thread AJ Bhatta

Hey that was my cap Gordy..now you owe me a beer! Good
flying.

AJ 
>  
> I ended it with style, about 15 guys witnessing, I
> brought it in on the  zero 
> and put the nose in the landing target hat to cap it
> with some panache  :-)
>  

> 
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


RE: [RCSE] "I found a new glue at Toledo and you didn't!"

2005-05-16 Thread Lydon, Matthew (NBC Universal)








Why keep it a mystery - what is it,
and who makes it?

 

Matt

 









From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 10:03
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; soaring@airage.com
Subject: [RCSE] "I found a
new glue at Toledo
and you didn't!"



 

Very pricy indeed at $89.00 per 20 grams of glue in a kit, which
includes the various
accelerators, primers, and modifiers in a handy
plastic tool box.
50 grams (under 2 oz)
of glue by itself for $45.00.

Special purpose glue to
be sure. But it certainly sounds interesting

 

You guys can go back and read my original
post

I didn't say 'interesting' and being a
sailplaner, buying somethiing expensive is an oxy moron.

 

Stand by, it should be in the next issue.

That Pasco stuff is just another CA.

 

That's not a 'new' glue.

 

Gordy :-)








[RCSE] RE: "I found a new glue at Toledo and you didn't!"

2005-05-16 Thread Collins, Graham
Now I am really intrigued, it will be hard to wait for the next RCSD.
 
cheers, Graham in Embrun near Ottawa Canada

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 10:03
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Collins, Graham; soaring@airage.com
Subject: "I found a new glue at Toledo and you didn't!"



Very pricy indeed at $89.00 per 20 grams of glue in a kit, which
includes the various accelerators, primers, and modifiers in a handy
plastic tool box.
50 grams (under 2 oz) of glue by itself for $45.00.

Special purpose glue to be sure. But it certainly sounds interesting
 
You guys can go back and read my original post
I didn't say 'interesting' and being a sailplaner, buying somethiing expensive 
is an oxy moron.
 
Stand by, it should be in the next issue.
That Pasco stuff is just another CA.
 
That's not a 'new' glue.
 
Gordy :-)


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


[RCSE] "I found a new glue at Toledo and you didn't!"

2005-05-16 Thread GordySoar



Very pricy indeed at $89.00 per 20 grams of glue in a kit, 
whichincludes the various accelerators, primers, and modifiers in a 
handyplastic tool box.50 grams (under 2 oz) of glue by itself for 
$45.00.Special purpose glue to be sure. But it certainly sounds 
interesting
 
You guys can go back and read my original post
I didn't say 'interesting' and being a sailplaner, buying 
somethiing expensive is an oxy moron.
 
Stand by, it should be in the next issue.
That Pasco stuff is just another CA.
 
That's not a 'new' glue.
 
Gordy :-)


[RCSE] Jim Bag

2005-05-16 Thread Brian Smith
Went to MG..Thanks..Brian


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


Re: [RCSE] Our contest

2005-05-16 Thread Chuck Anderson
At 08:10 AM 5/16/2005, you wrote:
I was ask: What - Where is our contest.?
  It is May 28th and 29th  Two one day events with a high overall award for
the weekend. RES and Unlimited classesIt is the 26th year running this
event has been held here..
  We have great winches and use retrievers, it will open winch, laid back
but very competitive, and we normally get a nice turn out from a 4 or 5
state area..
  We are in Tullahoma TN about 1/2 way between Nashville and Chattanooga, 15
miles off I24..Kendall McDonald is the CD and can be reached at 931 455 5779
Actually this is the 35th annual spring soaring contest.  I was the CD for 
the first one in May,1971 and we haven't  missed a year.  The first one was 
so successful we held another the following September and haven't missed a 
fall contest either.

Chuck Anderson 

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


[RCSE] RE: Great day slope flying on Maui

2005-05-16 Thread Nathan Woods
Al, you flew a Quick Silver at Maluhia? Wow, you must have great eyes!
Anything smaller than 60" specs out for me before you get out over the
lift band.

Wishing I was there with you, and I really mean that!

Cheers,

Nathan Woods

-Original Message-
From: "glide" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

The wind at Camp Maluhia was averaging 18 M.P.H gusting to 25 M.P.H.
Everything flew today from foamies to 4 meter scale ships and even a
beautiful Wizard Compact.  The lift was excellent and fun was had by
all.  I was able to fly my Lucky and get that trimmed out as with my
reconditioned Quick Silver and JW.  

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


RE: [RCSE] "I found a new glue at Toledo and you didn't!"

2005-05-16 Thread John Derstine
Very pricy indeed at $89.00 per 20 grams of glue in a kit, which
includes the various accelerators, primers, and modifiers in a handy
plastic tool box.
50 grams (under 2 oz) of glue by itself for $45.00.

Special purpose glue to be sure. But it certainly sounds interesting.
JD

Endless Mountain Models
http://www.scalesoaring.com
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

> -Original Message-
> From: Collins Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 7:29 AM
> To: Soaring@airage.com
> Subject: RE: [RCSE] "I found a new glue at Toledo and you didn't!"
> 
> Sounds like this might be PascoFix
> 
> http://www.pascofix.de/Pasco_-_Fix/pasco_-_fix.html
> 
> Not really new; maybe new at Toldeo however.  It has been around for
some
> time. It seems to be a high grade CYANO glue "system". System in the
sense
> that they have fillers and primers.
> 
> Yes, it does work very well and is a high quality product, a little
goes a
> long way but it is pricey.
> 
> If it is not PascoFix, I'd sure like to know what this new magical
glue
> is.
> 
> cheers, Graham in Embrun near Ottawa
> 
> 

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


[RCSE] Our contest

2005-05-16 Thread Brian Smith
I was ask: What - Where is our contest.?
  It is May 28th and 29th  Two one day events with a high overall award for
the weekend. RES and Unlimited classesIt is the 26th year running this
event has been held here..
  We have great winches and use retrievers, it will open winch, laid back
but very competitive, and we normally get a nice turn out from a 4 or 5
state area..
  We are in Tullahoma TN about 1/2 way between Nashville and Chattanooga, 15
miles off I24..Kendall McDonald is the CD and can be reached at 931 455 5779


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


[RCSE] OVSS #2

2005-05-16 Thread Denny Zech
OVSS #2 will be at LOFT in Fort Wayne, Indiana June 11 & 12.  We will be 
flying both sportsman and expert on saturday.  No separate awards for 
unlimited on sunday.  Location is Salomon Farm (same as last year).  
Flier is on the web site.

http://www.loftrc.org/steele/flier.html
If I don't see you this weekend in Cincinnati, hope to see you in Fort 
Wayne.

Denny Zech
LSF II
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


[RCSE] Jim Bag

2005-05-16 Thread Brian Smith
Cleaning up a little..Found a nice Jim bag..Blue and yellow..Used once "I
think"..Paid $100 "I think" (smile) Been behind my bed for nearly a year..Is
$60 for it fair?  I really don't want to ship it, so I can have it in Cincy
this coming Sat or here at our contest May 28 & 29..As usual thanks for the
BW..Brian Smith


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


RE: [RCSE] "I found a new glue at Toledo and you didn't!"

2005-05-16 Thread Collins, Graham
Sounds like this might be PascoFix

http://www.pascofix.de/Pasco_-_Fix/pasco_-_fix.html

Not really new; maybe new at Toldeo however.  It has been around for some time. 
It seems to be a high grade CYANO glue "system". System in the sense that they 
have fillers and primers.

Yes, it does work very well and is a high quality product, a little goes a long 
way but it is pricey.

If it is not PascoFix, I'd sure like to know what this new magical glue is.

cheers, Graham in Embrun near Ottawa


Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 20:24:40 -0700
From: George Gillburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: soaring@airage.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [RCSE] "I found a new glue at Toledo and you didn't!"
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> It has the best features of the glues we are currently using and I 
> just had an opportunity or misfortune to try it on a damage molded 
> wing tip.
>
> This stuff let  you move stuff around till you are satisfied then lets 
> you harden it immediately. You can put filler in it too.  Stting in 
> the jug it seems expensive but considering it has a shelf life 
> supposedly 10times that of CA and its versatility...cheap.
>  
> I'll be reviewing it in RCSD in a coming issue, just waiting on specs 
> etc. 
>
> How much do I like it?  I just ordered $300 worth.
>  
> Gordy
> Off to lexington for some soaring :-)

So, does $300 buy you 0.1 oz or a quart?


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format