RE: [RCSE] GreatPlanes Triton charger

2005-05-19 Thread Cameron
Jim,

Does the charge HAVE to be stopped after 12~16 hours of charging?  I have an
Alpha4 charger which charges until the NiMH battery peak had been reached
and then it switched to C/20 indefinitely.

Thank you for the info.

Cameron

-Original Message-
From: Jim Laurel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 1:30 PM
To: Cameron
Cc: rcse
Subject: Re: [RCSE] GreatPlanes Triton charger

Cameron,
Formation charges are required for preparing new NiMh packs.  You 
simply charge the pack at a current level equal to 1/10th of the pack 
capacity for around 12-16 hours.  For example, a 1000mAh pack would be 
charged at 100mAh for 12-16 hours.  A 2200mAh pack would be charged at 
220mAh.  On my Hobbico charger, I use the 250mAh setting.  It's not too 
critical.  Just try to get close.

Due to manufacturing variances, all battery cells of the same type are 
not truly identical.  When put together in a pack and charged, some 
will charge faster and peak early, which will fool most modern peak 
detecting chargers, leaving the laggard cells in a state of partial 
charge.  Slow charging at capacity/10 allows all the cells in a pack to 
get fully charged without causing a thermal crisis in the cells that 
have peaked early.  After 2-3 charge/discharge cycles like this, the 
cells reach a sort of equilibrium, charging and discharging together at 
relatively similar rates.  This is what you are trying to achieve with 
the initial formation charges.  You want all the cells in your pack to 
peak at the same time, and discharge at the same rate.  Once the pack 
is conditioned like this, you can use the peak detecting fast chargers 
with no problem.

Cheers,

--Jim

On May 19, 2005, at 10:12 AM, Cameron wrote:

 Jim,

 What is formation charges?  Does this relate to NiCad, NiMH, 
 Lithium-Ion or
 Lithium Polymer batteries?

 Thank you.

 Cameron


 -Original Message-
 From: Jim Laurel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 12:46 PM
 To: Jon Stone
 Cc: soaring@airage.com
 Subject: Re: [RCSE] GreatPlanes Triton charger

 Jon,
 Thanks for the tip on seeing total mAh!  That helps.

 Yes, I set the timer, which goes up to 960 minutes (or thereabouts),
 which translates into 16 hours - perfect cutoff for formation charges.
 The downsides to using the Triton for this are:

 1) You have to remember to reset the delta peak, or you will fry the
 next pack you try to quick charge!
 2) The Triton only goes down to 100mAh, so you can only do formation
 charges on packs of 1000mAh capacity or more.  It's useless for
 formation charges on, for example, handlaunch packs.

 I keep a Hobbico R/C Multi Charger around, which has current settings
 ranging from just 25mAh to 500mAh.  I use it all the time for slow
 charging my RX packs and transmitters fitted with 2100mAh NiMh packs.
 Another plus is that it runs on 110VAC - very convenient!  It's a very
 useful item at just $29.99 new from Tower.  Everyone could make good
 use out of one of these simple inexpensive devices, IMHO.
 http://www2.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin/wti0001p?I=LXL331P=7

 You can use a timer with it, but the catch is that a small design flaw
 in the charger allows the pack to DISCHARGE into the charger itself
 when power to the charger is cut off.  I made a few adapters with
 inline rectifier diodes from Radio Shack that solves the problem.

 --Jim


 On May 19, 2005, at 6:06 AM, Jon Stone wrote:

 Jim,

 The Triton is a great charger for the money.  There are a few dumb
 things about the software, such as the way it erases the total mAh 
 put
 into a NiMh cell after it goes into top-off mode, but by and large
 it
 is a very good unit.  And again, you can't beat the price.

 You can press the right square button after the charge is done and
 review the Mah the charger put into the battery, before the top-off
 charge.  Same way you can review up to 10 charge/discharge values.
 Have to do it before disconnecting the pack, or before pressing the
 left button, though.

 I use it for all sorts of cells, including NiCd, NiMh, and LiPo.  It
 can even be tricked into doing a formation charge on NiMh packs by
 rning the delta peak setting up really high.

 Thanks for the trick about forming packs.  I had not figured that one
 out.  I had been keeping another charger around just for that feature.
  I assume you also set the timer to the # of hours you want to charge.

 Jon


 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send 
 subscribe and
 unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that
 subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format 
 with
 MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and 
 AOL
 are generally NOT in text format





RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web

[RCSE] What is the deal with ICON sailplanes?

2005-05-19 Thread Cameron
What is the deal with ICON sailplanes and selling them privately?  It seems
like every time someone mentions buying or selling an Icon from anyone else
(other than the manufacturer) there is some buzz going on about it...  Does
the manufacturer prohibit you from dealing with a third party sale or
purchase of an Icon?  What will they do?  Blacklist you?

Thank you.

Cameron Ninham



RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


RE: [RCSE] GreatPlanes Triton charger (Schulze)

2005-05-18 Thread Cameron








I dont have any experience with
this charger although I briefly looked into buying one myself. However, I
opted to purchase a Schulze isl 6-330d charger instead.



See: 

http://www.schulze-elektronik-gmbh.de/prs10_e.htm

http://www.schulze-elektronik-gmbh.de/isl6-e.htm

http://www.schulze-elektronik-gmbh.de/isl8-e.htm

http://www.schulze-elektronik-gmbh.de/eco-e.htm



Regards,



Cameron Ninham













From: Bill Johns
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 4:27
PM
To: Soaring - Yahoo
Subject: [RCSE] GreatPlanes Triton
charger







Greetings!











Anyone have any experience with the
GreatPlanes Triton charger? Any comments pro on con are most welcome.











Thanks,











Bill





---





Never judge a day by the weather.











Bill Johns





Colton, WA














[RCSE] JR 351 Servo Brass Gear Set for Sale or Swap

2005-05-13 Thread Cameron
I have four (4) brass gear sets for JR 351 micro servos, in the original
packaging and have never been opened, available for sale or swap/exchange.
I will sell the 351 brass gear sets to the highest bidder *OR* swap for JR
368 alloy gear sets.

Contact me at off-line via email.

Cameron Ninham



RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


RE: [RCSE] Distance Calculation

2005-05-11 Thread Cameron
It is called the GREATER CIRCLE ROUTE.  I have the calculation.  I will send
it off to you as soon as I find it.

Cameron Ninham


-Original Message-
From: Bill Rakozy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 4:48 PM
To: RCSE
Subject: [RCSE] Distance Calculation

Question: 
With two GPS coordinates, is there a simple formula or converter to
calculate the distance in miles between those two GPS points.  

For instance: One GPS coordinate is in Chicago; and a second is in Northern
Canada; what is the distance (mileage) between these two points?

I came up dry searching Google!

Bill Rakozy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rakozy.com
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that
subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with
MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL
are generally NOT in text format


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


RE: [RCSE] Distance Calculation

2005-05-11 Thread Cameron
Here you go.  As I said, it is called the GREAT CIRCLE NAVIGATION/ROUTE:

http://williams.best.vwh.net/avform.htm

Check out this entire site.  It is loaded with useful information.

Cameron Ninham


-Original Message-
From: Bill Rakozy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 4:48 PM
To: RCSE
Subject: [RCSE] Distance Calculation

Question: 
With two GPS coordinates, is there a simple formula or converter to
calculate the distance in miles between those two GPS points.  

For instance: One GPS coordinate is in Chicago; and a second is in Northern
Canada; what is the distance (mileage) between these two points?

I came up dry searching Google!

Bill Rakozy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rakozy.com
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that
subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with
MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL
are generally NOT in text format


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


[RCSE] What is a JR REVERSE Servo?

2005-05-09 Thread Cameron
On the JR/Horizon Web site many of the servos are listed as REVERSE servos,
e.g. DS3301 Digital Wing Servo [JRPSDS3301] and Reverse DS3301 Servo
[JRPSDS3301R].  What are reverse servos?  How do they differ from standard
servos?

Thank you,

Cameron Ninham




RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


RE: [RCSE] JR battery connector for 9303

2005-05-05 Thread Cameron








Yes, 



http://www.RadicalRC.com

or

http://batteriesamerica.com

go to
the RC/Hobbies link and look at the TX packs...



Cameron











From: Lydon, Matthew
(NBC Universal) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 12:00
PM
To: RCSE
Subject: [RCSE] JR battery
connector for 9303





Does anyone have a source for the battery-to-pcboard
connector used in the new 9303? I've got an aftermarket Nimh pack, and don't
want to cut and solder.



TIA,

Matt








RE: [RCSE] JR battery connector for 9303

2005-05-05 Thread Cameron








It is the new white JR connector,
even though it says it is for the XP8103 or XP8303 J



Cameron













From: glide
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 12:30
PM
To: 'RCSE'
Subject: RE: [RCSE] JR battery
connector for 9303





I went to the Radical RC website and they
talk about the old (black) and new (white) transmitter battery connector for
the 8303 and no mention about the 9303. I know the 9303 transmitter
battery connector is a white t connector but is it the same as
the white t connector for the 8303?













From: Jon Stone
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 6:07
AM
To: Lydon, Matthew (NBC
Universal); RCSE
Subject: Re: [RCSE] JR battery
connector for 9303









www.radicalrc.com











specifically,











http://radicalrc.secure-mall.com/shop/index.php?shop=1cat=100cart=312469















- Original Message - 





From: Lydon,
Matthew (NBC Universal) 





To: RCSE 





Sent: Thursday, May 05,
2005 10:59 AM





Subject: [RCSE] JR battery
connector for 9303









Does anyone have a source for the battery-to-pcboard
connector used in the new 9303? I've got an aftermarket Nimh pack, and don't
want to cut and solder.



TIA,

Matt










[RCSE] HELP: JR XP9303 setup with six servo wing?

2005-05-03 Thread Cameron
I have not yet gone through the manual for the JR XP9303, but is it possible
(simple/easy) to program the XP9303 radio for a six servo wing -- L  R
flap, L  R inboard aileron, and L  R outboard/tip ailerons???

Can I setup the inboard and outboard ailerons to move by the same and/or
different amounts?

Thank you.

Cameron Ninham



RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


[RCSE] RE: HELP: JR XP9303 setup with six servo wing?

2005-05-03 Thread Cameron
Hello Jon,

Thank you for the reply.  I know how to setup the standard six servo
SAILPLANE.  But my question is regarding a six servo WING -- i.e. total of
eight servos or more.  Thus the WING has L  R flap, L  R inboard aileron,
and L  R outboard/tip ailerons (plus the standard rudder and elevator).

Cameron


-Original Message-
From: Jon Stone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 4:22 PM
To: Cameron
Subject: Re: HELP: JR XP9303 setup with six servo wing?

I can tell you things, but all I'd end up doing is reading the manual for
you, or pointing you to the manual.  The questions you are asking are
clearly covered in the manual.  Start with the sailplane appendix.  It walks
you through step-by-step how to setup a 6-servo plane.

Jon Stone



RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


RE: [RCSE] HELP: JR XP9303 setup with six servo wing?

2005-05-03 Thread Cameron
Sherman,

In my case I am considering a large 4.5 meter (177”) scale sailplane.  The
sailplane’s wing uses six servos – three servos per side.  The wing is
designed for three servos per side.  (I would prefer not using mechanical
linkages, and using software mixing instead.)  Thus the wing servos would
operate L  R flap, L  R inboard aileron, and L  R outboard/tip ailerons.
I would like the outboard ailerons to match the movement of the inboard
ailerons – but possibly reduce the total travel of the outboard ailerons to
60~80% travel compared to the inboard ailerons.  Depending on the sailplane
characteristics, e.g. adverse yaw, I may need to increase or reduce the
percentage of mixing and the ratio of movement between the outboard and
inboard ailerons.

Thank you,

Cameron Ninham



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 5:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; soaring@airage.com
Subject: Re: [RCSE] HELP: JR XP9303 setup with six servo wing?

In a message dated 5/3/2005 1:14:25 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have not yet gone through the manual for the JR XP9303, but is it possible
(simple/easy) to program the XP9303 radio for a six servo wing -- L  R
flap, L  R inboard aileron, and L  R outboard/tip ailerons???

Can I setup the inboard and outboard ailerons to move by the same and/or
different amounts?
The answer is yes.  However that is a very incomplete answer.  What do you
want the outboard aileron to do?  Sounds like a stupid question, but it is
not.  What do you want the outboard Ail to do in lunch mode?  Cruise Mode? 
Thermal Mode?  Landing mode?  It is easy to get the tiperons to follow the
ailerons.  If that is all you want, then why have them servo driven? 
Mechanical connection is much lighter.  So, until you figure out what you
want them to do, there is no way to answer the question. 
 
Sherman Knight
The Law Offices of Sherman L Knight
5400 Carillon Point
Kirkland WA 98033
425-576-4028 wk
425-576-4029 fax
425-822-9305 hm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] e-mail


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


RE: [RCSE] Ultimate soaring car?

2005-05-02 Thread Cameron
VW Toureg (the V-10 diesel *IF* you can afford it) -- it had more power and
torque than most trucks and has better gas mileage than the average mid size
car.  See:

http://www.vw.com/touareg/index.htm
http://www.edmunds.com/new/2005/volkswagen/touareg/suv/midsize/index.html

Of course, seeing I am mentioning nice to have's out of my price range,
why not a H1 or H2 Hummer, Porsche Cayenne, Toyota Land Cruiser, or a Land
Rover Range Rover.

Oh well, it's only money (which I don't have) and it's nice to dream...  :-)

Cameron


-Original Message-
From: Jim Laurel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 1:22 PM
To: soaring@airage.com
Subject: [RCSE] Ultimate soaring car?

So, the discussion about the suitability of Corvettes for hauling 
sailplanes got me to thinking more about my next choice of vehicle.  It 
should have the following attributes:

1) Space to haul 2 unlimited planes and a 2 meter plane + winch, 
toolbox, 1 Optima battery, turnaround, radio cases + at least 1, 
preferably 2 passengers
2) Fast and comfortable for those long hauls to away contests
3) Reasonable fuel economy (20-21mpg highway minimum)
4) All wheel drive, since here in Washington the passes are often a 
mess, roads are often wet, and I like to ski after work in the winter.
5) Decent driving dynamics
6) Enough clearance to travel forest service roads to slope sites
7) NOT a minivan

Here's my short list:
--Volvo XC70
--Audi A6 Avant
--Audi S4 Avant (not sure if long enough)
--Dodge (Mercedes) short wheelbase Sprinter (no AWD yet, but likely for 
2007 model year)
--Subaru whatchamacallit wagon

I have an old Land Rover 110 that has been a project vehicle for 2 
years and is now nearing completion.  Size-wise, it's about perfect, 
but it is slow, lumbering, and eats high octane petrol like there's no 
tomorrow (curse the DOT and EPA for not getting us decent diesel fuel 
sooner; I'd love to have a nice 300 Tdi rather than the V8).  Plus, the 
HVAC system is useless - pretty much windows up or down.  In the plus 
column, however, it will get you to any slope site you like and then 
some.  It's also got a rooftop tent, which might be nice for those 
2-day contests.

Let's hear some suggestions!

--Jim Laurel

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that
subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with
MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL
are generally NOT in text format


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


RE: [RCSE] Ultimate soaring car?

2005-05-02 Thread Cameron
That being said, if a car or car-like SUC is your choice:

The new HYBRID 2006 Lexus RX 400h SUV (i.e. luxury car)
City Mileage: 31 mpg, Hwy Mileage: 27 mpg, AWD/4WD
http://www.edmunds.com/new/2006/lexus/rx400h/100521765/researchlanding.html

Cameron



-Original Message-
From: Jim Laurel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 3:58 PM
To: soaring@airage.com
Subject: RE: [RCSE] Ultimate soaring car?

Ok, ok, everyone...  So I know the inclusion of the Sprinter got everyone
confused.  That was a pretty random item on my list and I would be hard
pressed to choose that one.  It is, however, a very interesting vehicle.
These and similar designs, such as the Ford Transit will eventually replace
the traditional American-style full size van.  They have superior capacity,
maneuverability, economy, and handling.

I'm inclined against SUVs as well, due to handling and fuel economy.  They
do have the space and the ability to travel to slopes, though.  My wife has
been driving a Land Rover Discovery for almost 10 years now and it is an
excellent vehicle.  But it eats gas like crazy and is a bit tiring when
you're flogging it along on a long trip.  If you need the weight bearing
capacity, it's great, and it is very very good off road.

It seems like a station wagon or car-based SUV might be the best choice.  It
should be big enough but still a reasonably entertaining drive, which kind
of rules out the pickups and truck-based SUVs.  However, some of the
car-based SUVs will be worth a look.

Volvo loaned me an XC90 as a journalist demo once when I was doing an
article for Slate's Well Traveled on Scandinavian design.  I drove it
through Denmark, Sweden and Finland in February, so have a good idea of its
winter abilities.  I liked it quite a bit, but was a little bothered by its
front wheel drive bias.  The front wheels would always scratch for grip for
a few moments before the abs kicked in and directed some torque to the rear
wheels.  But that was minor.  The best thing about the XC90 was the really
clever and flexible rear seating set up.  You could carry 4 passengers with
skis (or sailplanes) down the middle and gear in the back, seven passengers
with all the seats unfolded, fold all the seats and have a big flat space
for cargo, 4 passengers with something long running up one side, remove
seats altogether or several other combinations.

A few hours carving up some rural roads in a good handling car is always
good fun!  I'm not convinced the Volvo XC90 or XC70 is up to that.
 
The Audi S4 would be really sweet, if only it is big enough for unlimited
sailplanes in bags.  I'll have to measure it and see.  With 340hp, 6 speed
stick and AWD in a small station wagon, it's sure to be very entertaining
indeed.  But clearance might be an issue.  The Allroad is just about
perfect, and has the clearance, but it's a bad time to buy one, as Audi is
updating the styling across the line, and Allroad is due.  Maybe a new one
by next year, unless they decide that it doesn't make any sense sitting in
between the A4 and A6 Avants.  I would also assume that they are going to do
an S6 Avant, like the A4/S4, ground clearance issue will be a problem.

--Jim


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that
subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with
MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL
are generally NOT in text format


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


RE: [RCSE] Ultimate soaring car? (extreme TRUCK)

2005-05-02 Thread Cameron

Ok, let's take it to the other EXTREME:

The UNIMOG truck!
http://www.unimogtrucks.com/products/utility.asp

Now this is a real man's soaring and recreational vehicle!

For those uninitiated, this is a real OFF-ROAD TRUCK!  By truck I don't mean
a pickup truck, utility truck, or some soccer moms SUV/Minuvan, but a real
4-wheel-drive TRUCK.  Some farmers in Africa (and across the world) even use
these truck as TRACTORS to pull plows, trailers, haul a lot a crap, and
general heavy hauling farm work.

Back in the days when I lived in South Africa I used to go hang gliding
almost every weekend.  The sites that we flew from were typical mountain
ridges and mountain tops.  Many/most of these sites did not have standard
access roads to them.  During meets or competitions some people would use
these Unimog trucks to haul the hang glider pilots *and* there hang gliders
to the top of the mountains.  These trucks would go over boulders the
size/height of a grown man's hip without a hiccup...!  Through a canvas over
the back to make it a camper and you can haul as much sh*#$%t as you
want, including enough camping gear and supplies to last you several months!
*grin*

Cameron



RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


RE: [RCSE] JR Radio base loaded whip antenna compatible with 6 meter?

2005-05-01 Thread Cameron








Hello Al,



I have used the JR base loaded antenna
with my JR XP9303 on 72 and 53/50 MHz frequencies without any problems.



Cameron













From: glide
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2005
8:11 PM
To: soaring@airage.com
Subject: [RCSE]
JR Radio base loaded whip antenna compatible with 6 meter?





Would anyone in the group know if the JR base loaded whip
antenna would work with six meter frequencies? Ive got a 9303 but
Ive always been used to using a more compact rubber duck antenna on my
transmitters. I would want to get the JR whip antenna but would want to
confirm that it will be compatible with six meters.



Mahalo and aloha to all in the group.



Al Battad  WH6VE

AMA #506981



BTW, does anyone in the group also know how to setup a hotliner
on the 9303 (sailplane version). The manual is kind of vague in this
respect and I truly would appreciate some help from the knowledgeable people
here in the group.








RE: [RCSE] NATS or OSHKOSH?

2005-04-28 Thread Cameron
Hey Keith,

Funny that you and Benn mention camping out near the runway...  That is
exactly what we did.  We were at the approach end of the runway, right under
the runway extension line into Sun 'n Fun.  It sure was awesome to see the
P-38 Lightning (Glacier Girl from the Lost Squadron), several P-51D
Mustangs, F4 Phantom, some Corsairs, F16  F18's, L39 jets, DC-3, Grumman
Albatross'es, many private/business jets, the new Eclipse 500 VLJ (Very
Light Jet), Adams A500 and A700, Lancair's, Cirrius'es, and all the various
other home built aircraft, etc.  It was AWESOME!

We were definitely woken up every morning around 7~7:30 AM as they started
coming in for finals.

Of course after watching them for a while and looking at some guys overshoot
the base leg, then bank STEEP to make it back on line for short final
(line-up with the runway) you could not help but wonder what would happen if
the guy/pilot made a cross-controlled stall and nose dived it down into the
ground...  What would the chances be of being hit...  *grin*

If you end up going to Oshkosh give me a buzz.  The chances are good that we
will be going also -- if only for a day or two (over the weekend).

Regards,

Cameron



-Original Message-
From: Keith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 6:44 AM
To: Cameron; RCSE
Subject: Re: [RCSE] NATS or OSHKOSH?

Cameron,

If I can get the 172 ready by then (it's in need of LE repairs and some 
avionics work), I'm definitely going!  I like what Ben Diss did, and will 
try to do the same.  The thought of being camped out near enough to hear and

see warbirds roaring off in the morning as a wakeup call is too hard to 
resist!  I wish I had a Lance or Saratoga to fly there.  I have over 1,000 
hours in that type, and yes, what a great campout plane it would be!

Keith


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


RE: [RCSE] NATS or OSHKOSH?

2005-04-28 Thread Cameron
Oh, well...  I guess you take you chances...  *smile*  (I did hear about
those crashed too.)

Cameron

-Original Message-
From: Anker Berg-Sonne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 1:27 PM
To: Cameron
Cc: 'Keith'; 'RCSE'
Subject: RE: [RCSE] NATS or OSHKOSH?



The year I was at Oshkosh there were three crashes, two of which I 
witnessed. I would not camp anywhere near the end of a runway.

Anker 



RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


RE: [RCSE] NATS or OSHKOSH?

2005-04-27 Thread Cameron
Hi Keith,

OSHKOSH -- I *AGREE*!!!  My partner and I just flew down to Sun 'n Fun at
Lakeland FL in our Piper Lance (e.g. pre-Saratoga).  We camped at Sun 'n Fun
-- we took out the back seats (2nd and 3rd row), put in some pillows,
mattress and a couple of sleeping bags.  In the evenings we either BBQ at
the plane with the other pilots or eat at the local Margeretaville
bar/cafeteria.  We had a GREAT time.

Also, pack in you HLG glider and impress the local/camping pilots!  This way
you can have your cake and eat it too!

Regards,

Cameron


-Original Message-
From: Keith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 5:08 PM
To: soaring@airage.com
Subject: [RCSE] NATS or OSHKOSH?

I was just about to mail my registration in for the NATS, but a buddy called

me up to ask if I'd figured out where I was going to camp and what airplane 
I was flying into Oshkosh this summer...Ah, #%@*#!

H.Oshkosh or the NATS...

OSHKOSH BY GOSH!  For those of you less enlightened, I am referring to 
EAA Airventure 2005.  The biggest sport aviation fly-in/air show/party on 
the planet!

Although I'd hoped to be flying to Oshkosh in an RV-6, it's not going to 
happen in time so I guess I'll just have to go in a classic 1967 C-172 
square tail.

Have fun at the NATS.  Guess I'll go to Eagle Butte for soaring fix this 
summer.

Keith McLellan
Northampton, PA
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that
subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with
MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL
are generally NOT in text format


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


[RCSE] Info on lithium-polymer batteries???

2005-04-24 Thread Cameron
I am hearing a lot of talk about lithium-polymer batteries, but I don't know
much about them.  What is the real info with lithium-polymer batteries?  Can
they be used to replace either Tx or Rx Ni-Cd battery packs for RC
applications?  Can lithium-polymer batteries handle hi current draw
applications?  Does lithium-polymer discharge over extended periods of time
like Ni-Cd batteries?  Does lithium-polymer deteriorate in capacity (and
storage) as the ambient temperature increases?

In advance, thank you for the info.

Cameron Ninham


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


[RCSE] Info on Jacksonville Area Soaring Society Wanted

2005-04-24 Thread Cameron
Can anyone help me with information on the Jacksonville Area Soaring
Society, please?  Is there someone on this list whom belongs to the
Jacksonville Area Soaring Society?  Does anyone have some contact
information for me on the Jacksonville Area Soaring Society, please?

Thank you,

Cameron Ninham




RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


RE: [RCSE] sailplane info wanted

2005-04-22 Thread Cameron
I own a Vulcan2M.  It is a very nice sailplane.  One thing though -- when
you balance the sailplane according to the specs in the instructions it will
have a very aft CG and be quite twitchy to fly.  I would recommend moving
the CG between 1/4 to 1/2 inch forward.  I usually launch the sailplane by
which or hi-start and then head out to search for thermals.  It handles fine
with a quick roll rate but it is sensitive to pitch.  I like the sailplane a
lot and fly it frequently.

Cameron Ninham



RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


[RCSE] JR XP9303 battery plug?

2005-04-21 Thread Cameron
Has the battery plug/adapter (inside the radio) for the JR XP9303 been
changed from the XP8103?  I have a battery pack (Sanyo 1100 mah) which I
used on the XP8103.  I tried to plug it into the XP9303 but it does not seem
to fit...

Damn!

Thanks you

Cameron Ninham



RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


[RCSE] Need JR XP9303 battery plug

2005-04-21 Thread Cameron
OK, I inspected the old plug that was on the XP8103 battery and the new one
on the XP9303 -- they definitely are different.

Now, where can I purchase a battery PLUG that will fit the new XP9303???

Thank you,

Cameron


-Original Message-
From: Cameron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2005 7:23 PM
To: RCSE
Subject: [RCSE] JR XP9303 battery plug?

Has the battery plug/adapter (inside the radio) for the JR XP9303 been
changed from the XP8103?  I have a battery pack (Sanyo 1100 mah) which I
used on the XP8103.  I tried to plug it into the XP9303 but it does not seem
to fit...

Damn!

Thanks you

Cameron Ninham



RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


[RCSE] JR XP9303 Sailplane Manual Error?

2005-04-20 Thread Cameron
A few months ago I recal seeing a post by someone on
RCSE about an error on programming the JR XP9303 radio
for a sailplane setup.  

I have looked through the archives, but I cannot seem
to find the article.  Can anyone help me and guide me
to the article, please?  Otherwise, what are the
errors in the manual?

Thank you.

Cameron Ninham

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


Re: [RCSE] Radio Charging Error-advice please

2005-04-20 Thread Cameron
Hello Scobie,

Yes, the JR charger for the RADIO (only) is REVERSED.

If you pluged in a charger from a different brand
(with reversed polarity) into the radio it will short
out the fuse in the TX.  You will have to replace the
fuse.

Regards,

Cameron Ninham


--- Scobie Puchtler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Y'all know I'm no electronics whiz, so I'd
 appreciate a little advice if any
 is necessary:
  
 I just charged both of my JR TX's for several hours
 using two wall chargers.
 One charger was stock JR, the other one I THOUGHT
 was my other stock JR wall
 charger. but I now see that it was actually a
 Hitec wall charger. The
 radio that was on the Hitec charger had zilch,
 wouldn't come on, LCD display
 didn't even flash for a second. Seemed very weird at
 first, but once I
 realized it had been on the wrong charger, things
 started to make more
 sense.
  
 I've now got the uncharged  (mis-charged?) radio
 charging on the JR charger,
 as was the original intent.
  
 I seem to remember from my days of wiring various
 other chargers that the
 wall charger polarity on a Hitec and  JR chargers
 might be opposite. 
  
 Any reason to expect that I've done any damage to
 the battery? Anything I
 should be doing or checking?
  
 I already put the 'correctly charged' battery in the
 TX that was on the
 Hitec charger and everything works fine.
  
 Thanks in advance for any reassurances (or horrors
 if warranted)   :-)
  
  
 Lift,
 Scobie in Seattle
 
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane
 News.  Send subscribe and unsubscribe requests
 to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that
 subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in
 text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent
 from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are
 generally NOT in text format
 
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


Re: [RCSE] Most fun plane

2004-11-26 Thread Cameron
My most fun plane: my first Great Planes Spirit 100 which I built and flew.
Light, simple, great for thermalling and/or slop in light conditions.  Just
a great all round fun sailplane.

Cameron


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.


RE: [RCSE] Battery food-Charger (Now: Chargers for *all* types or batteries)

2004-11-10 Thread Cameron
As far as chargers are concerned, for *all* types of rechargeable batteries,
I like the Schulze chargers (isl 6-330d, isl 6-430d, isl 6-530d, isl 6-636+,
and isl 8-936g).  I would love the isl 8-936g, but definitely cannot afford
it.  The isl 6-330d and isl 6-430d are very good -- value for money.

See: http://www.schulze-elektronik-gmbh.de/index_uk.htm

Cameron

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.


Re: [RCSE] Battery food-Charger

2004-11-09 Thread Cameron
To quote Litco Systems directly from their manual for the Alpha 4 charger:

PLEASE NOTE: ALL DEVICES ON A-4 EXCEPT W DEVICE ARE INTENDED FOR NI-CADS.
ONLY V AND W DEVICES MAY BE USED WITH WET AND GEL CELLS (LEAD-ACID
BATTERIES). ALL DEVICES EXCEPT A,S W ARE SUITABLE FOR NIMH BATTERIES
(NICKEL-METAL-HYDRIDE). TO BE ON THE SAFE SIDE USE ONLY I AND C CHARGER
WITH NIMH CELLS.

:-)  *smile*

Cameron

-Original Message-

Date: Tue,  9 Nov 2004 11:43:28 -0800
From: Simon Van Leeuwen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [RCSE] Battery food-Charger
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

That's the probelm with employing a NiCD charger that peak-detects for NiCD 
instead of NiMH. NiMH are endomthermic, while NiCD technology is exothermic.

This means as an NiCD becomes fully charged, the increase in heat causes an 
increase in internal resistance, which lowers the charge V, which trips the 
peak-detect circuitry.

Efficient cells like the KAN's do not induce a voltage depression adequate 
enough to trip the peak-detect, so the charger keeps pumping in the current.

NiCD chargers are great at ruining perfectly good NiMH cells. Then the cells

get blamed for poor performance... 



Quoting Regis White [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 
 
 I bought an Alpha 4 about six or seven years ago and have been quite
 happy with it.  But (there is always a but) it did not have a
 separate discharge function - it only cycled (once).  NiCads like to
 be left discharged I have been led to believe.  Ni-MH on the other
 hand like to be fully charged - and can be harmed if fully
 discharged.  So I have replaced most of my NiCads.  What I learned
 was that I could not safely charge them on the Alpha 4 'Peak'
 function or even the 'c/10' function - only the 'Fast charge'
 function.  Recently I acquired two KAN Ni-MH 7 cell packs and was
 surprised to find that the Alpha 4 could not automatic charge them
 safely - they got very hot.  Since both packs got very hot, I suspect
 the KAN cells are just not compatible with Alpha 4 technology (which
 is easily 20 years old).  (I mean we can plug in a cell phone to
 charge and just forget it.)   Is there something about the KAN type
 cells that are different or is this an anomaly?  Regis
 
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.


[RCSE] WTB: JR XP9303 radio (JRP9260)

2004-10-04 Thread Cameron
I would like to purchase a new JR XP9303 radio (XP9303 Sailplane R770 No
Sx's MD2 -- JRP9260).  Does any one know of a company whom has them IN
STOCK, please?

Thank you,

Cameron Ninham
Email: cpn66 at hotmail dot com

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.


RE: [RCSE] What are airfoil polars and how do I read the charts?

2004-09-24 Thread Cameron
-Begin Original Message-
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 09:06:12 -0400
From: Jay Hunter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: What are airfoil polars and how do I read the charts?
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I have Profili and it lists polars as one of its great features.  What
are they, how do I read them, and what do they tell me?

Thanks,

Jay Hunter

- End Original Message-


Jay, unfortunately you have asked a question which will take several text
books to explain.  Many people (aeronautical engineers etc) go to colleges
just to better understand airfoil polars...  *smile*

I will try to give a *SHORT* explanation without going into lengthy details:

An airfoil polar represent the aerodynamic characteristics of an airfoil.
This is usually represented as a graph showing lift vs. drag coefficients,
lift vs angle of attack, and lift vs pitching moment. An airfoil is placed
in a wind tunnel, and lift, drag, pitching moment and angle of attach
measurements are taken at various wind speeds and calculated as the local
Reynolds number. As a general rule of thumb (gross exaggeration) you want to
minimize the drag for a given lift coefficient.  As is the case in
aeronautics in general, there are always tradeoffs.  When an airfoil has a
good lift vs drag value at one point, it may be bad at another, etc. etc.
etc.  The trick is to find an airfoil which has the desired
characteristics at the important phases of flight for which it is intended
to be used.  E.g. a trainer airfoil might have a high lift coefficient,
higher drag coefficient (to make it fly slower or come down faster), low
pitching moment and benign stall.  But a F3B racer might have a lower lift
coefficient (a high lift coefficient is not needed as much as it flies
faster)but a very low drag coefficient at racing speeds.  In another
example, with a tailless flying wing you want very little moment so that the
wing does not tuck under at flying speeds...  etc etc. etc.

Makes sense?

Regards,

Cameron Ninham
Email: cpn66 at hotmail dot com


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.


Re: [RCSE] How to Determine the Correct Incidence

2004-09-17 Thread Cameron
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 07:46:00 -0700
From: Bill Malvey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: rc Soaring Exchange [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [RCSE] How to Determine the Correct Incidence
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And my Artemis was spot on right out of the box. Which I believe was the
original question. It was about the V-tail incidence on the Artemis.
On 9/17/04 4:58 Phil Barnes wrote:

What I really should have asked is:  How do you determine the proper
incidence on a sailplane?


It is less draggy to fly around with no deflection or minimal deflection 
on
the elevator/ruddervators. In setting the correct incidence all you are
doing is setting the tail incidence relative to the wing incidence such 
that
the elevator/ruddervators are neutral at the most commonly used airspeed.

Phil

~~~
Bill Malvey
Hello Phil  Bill,
There are a couple of ways to determine the wind incidence, and many people 
have different opinions and preferences based upon their strategies.  Here 
is my personal preference and opinion: I feel that the most important phases 
in a sailplane's flight envelope is the thermalling and high speed cruise 
(sprinting from one thermal to another thermal) phase.  Total drag is has a 
greater impact during the high speed cruise phase.  So I try to optimise my 
sailplanes configuration to minimize drag during this phase.  Determine what 
the speed is that the sailplane will typically fly at during the high speed 
cruise.  Then, using the particular airfoil used on the sailplane, calculate 
what the lift coefficient is at that given speed and conditions.  Use the 
airfoil's CL vs alpha polar to determine the angle of attack at which this 
CL would occur.  Now that you know the angle of attach, I like to use this 
angle as the wing to fuselage incidence angle -- setting the wing incidence 
at this angle will allign the fuselage with the general freestream airflow, 
and thus minimize the drag caused by the fuselage at that given airspeed.

Regards,
Cameron Ninham
email: cpn66 at hotmail dot com
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages 
must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.


Re: [RCSE] aileron differential, which way?

2000-09-06 Thread Cameron

Danny, aileron differential should be more up than down.  In simple layman's
terms (non-aerodynamic), think of it as the wing is already producing lift,
you would need more up aileron to "counter balance" the lift than down
aileron (as down aileron increases camber and thus lift, where the wing is
already producing lift).

Cameron Ninham



- Original Message -
From: "daniel gaudenti" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 01, 2000 3:22 PM
Subject: [RCSE] aileron differential, which way?


 Should there be more up or down throw, and why?

 From what I remember, more up is required.  And the reason is to prevent
 adverse yaw.  More throw on the up aileron causes more drag and helps the
 plane yaw in the same direction of the turn.  Am I remembering correctly?

 TIA,

 Danny

 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe"
and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] aileron differential, which way?

2000-09-06 Thread Cameron

Danny, sorry - I misread your question.  I thought you were asking as to how
to remember whether it is more up or down aileron...

Anyway, to answer you question better.  For aileron differential, you want
more up aileron than down aileron.  The reason why is that with DOWN
aileron, you INCREASE the wing's (or airfoil) camber.  With an increase in
caber, you increase the cl.  Opposite is true for the other side.  When you
RAISE the aileron on the other side, you decrease with wing's camber in that
region.  With decreased camber you decrease the operating cl.  More lift on
one side of the wing (more camber, thus more cl) increases the [vortex]
induced drag.  More drag has the effect of "pulling back" on that wing, and
thus making it slower than the other side -- resulting in adverse yaw.  This
effect is mainly predominant at low speeds.

Wing you increase the camber of an airfoil, in some cases, you may also get
an increase in profile drag (due to the larger "frontal shape" of the
wing/airfoil.

I hope this explanation was more clear.

Cameron Ninham


- Original Message -
From: "daniel gaudenti" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 01, 2000 3:22 PM
Subject: [RCSE] aileron differential, which way?


 Should there be more up or down throw, and why?

 From what I remember, more up is required.  And the reason is to prevent
 adverse yaw.  More throw on the up aileron causes more drag and helps the
 plane yaw in the same direction of the turn.  Am I remembering correctly?

 TIA,

 Danny

 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe"
and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] Last Call for Wind Meters

2000-08-25 Thread Cameron

Hi Tom,

How do we get an order in for the $135 price?  On the site listed the price
is $159.

Cameron

- Original Message -
From: "Tom Broeski" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 25, 2000 10:47 AM
Subject: [RCSE] Last Call for Wind Meters


 Last call to get in on the wind meters.

 Kestrel 1000  $79
 Kestrel 2000  $100
 Kestrel 3000  $135

 http://www.nkhome.com/ww/wwindex.html

 Tom

 --
 TG
 32 Mount View Dr.
 Afton, VA  22920
 540 943-3356


 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe"
and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[RCSE] FS: Airtronics 141

2000-01-20 Thread Cameron Ninham

I have four (4) Airtronics 141 servos for sale.  Brand new, in box, 
never used nor opened.  Make me a FAIR offer and they are yours.


Cameron Ninham
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   or   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel:   (217) 337-4859
Fax:   (217) 337-7547

1020 E Kerr Ave, Apt 201
Urbana, IL 61802, USA

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[RCSE] HELP - Looking for someone to build a sailplane(s)

1999-12-02 Thread Cameron Ninham

I am living in an apartment and do not have any access to a work area, 
or even good tools, for that matter.  I have two sailplanes, a NSP Edge 
(122") and Monarch HLG, which are new in the box and have not been 
touched for almost two years.  In addition I have one sailplane which 
is in need of finishing (Swift 2M) and another in need of repair 
(Spectrum 104").

I am looking for someone whom would like to build the sailplanes for 
me.  Naturally, I am willing to discuss some form of compensation.  If 
you are interested, or can recommend someone, I would appreciate it if 
you would get in touch with me, please.  Please include your building 
competency and/or "experience."

Thank you!!!

Cameron Ninham
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   or   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel:   (217) 337-4859
Fax:   (217) 337-7547

1020 E Kerr Ave, Apt 201
Urbana, IL 61802, USA

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]