Re: A 'Kill dupes' problem
Hello Roger, A reminder of what Roger Phillips typed on: 08 November 2004 at 04:55:59 GMT +0100 RP Given my comments here, can you give me a good and sensible reason why RP anybody would want to keep duplicates of a message within the same RP folder? Woa, Woa Woa, ang on a mo. I'm not talking anything about duplicates, all I'm doing is opposing the suggestion to do away with the option to park messages so they can't be deleted. I can't give you any reason why anyone would want duplicate messages, I can and have given you plenty of reasons why people would want to Protect a message from accidental deletion. Out of all the clients I've bought, and I have a few, The Bat is the only one that has the option to prevent accidental deletion. Obviously we are now going to be flooded with dozens of posts naming others that have the option :) -- Best regards,Tony. _ Message composed on 08/11/2004 at 09:56 UTC 2004 - AWB Using The Bat! v3.0.2.5 on Windows XP 5. 1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.0.2.5 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: A 'Kill dupes' problem
On Monday, November 8, 2004, 11:07, Tony Boom wrote: Out of all the clients I've bought, and I have a few, The Bat is the only one that has the option to prevent accidental deletion. Obviously we are now going to be flooded with dozens of posts naming others that have the option :) Oh, I remember the old Amiga clients Spot and Thor :-) The first a fidonet client, the latter intended for both fidonet and email. Thor (or was it Spot?) had an extra feature called Super Unread which I used quite a lot. A message marked as Super Unread could not be marked unread other then by manually deselecting the Super Unread status. Not only protecting from deletion, but also from marking read. Running TB!, I use flagging for the same purpose, in addition with a VF showing me all flagged messages. Those were the days... -- Regards, Marcus Ohlström Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 PGP Public Key at http://www.canit.se/~marcus/pgp.asc Current beta is 3.0.2.5 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: A 'Kill dupes' problem
Hello Marcus, A reminder of what Marcus Ohlström typed on: 08 November 2004 at 12:54:00 GMT +0100 MO Oh, I remember the old Amiga clients Spot and Thor :-) The first a MO fidonet client, the latter intended for both fidonet and email. Amiga on the web eh? Bet that was fast :) I still got a 64 in the shed somewhere, never used it for email though. -- Best regards,Tony. _ Message composed on 08/11/2004 at 12:57 UTC 2004 - AWB Using The Bat! v3.0.2.5 on Windows XP 5. 1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.0.2.5 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: A 'Kill dupes' problem
Hello Tony Boom everyone else 08-Nov-2004 13:58, you wrote: MO Oh, I remember the old Amiga clients Spot and Thor :-) The first a MO fidonet client, the latter intended for both fidonet and email. Amiga on the web eh? Bet that was fast :) Faster than yo momma! :-) You know, its applications like TheBat that makes it easier for us Amiga geeks to dwell on Windows... hehe -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) using v3.0.2.5 on Windows XP Pro Service Pack 2 The only thing that stops God from sending another flood is that the first one was useless. -- Chamfort Current beta is 3.0.2.5 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
A 'Kill dupes' problem
Hi All, I have only recently noticed that the 'Kill duplicates' action ignores any messages that are marked as 'Parked'. My question is, does anyone know if this is intentional or if it is a bug? 9Val? If it is, 'as designed', then IMHO it should be changed. If one wants to remove duplicates then one wants to remove _ALL_ duplicates regardless of what their characteristics may be. Any comments? -- Best regards, Roger Flying with The Bat!, version 3.0.2.4 Rush, and antispam BayesIt! 0.7.4 on Windows ME, version 3000, Build 90 Current beta is 3.0.2.5 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: A 'Kill dupes' problem
Hello Roger! On Sunday, November 7, 2004 at 9:48:59 AM you wrote: Any comments? I think it is intentional. I also think it is logical: When I want to lock a message (which is what Park does), I don't want to have it deleted regardless of a duplicate purge. -- Dierk Haasis :Dierk: Copy 'n' Concept The Bat 3.0.2.5 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2 Chat info for ICQ, AIM, MSN, Yahoo, Jabber upon request What do you get when you fall in love? A girl with a pin to burst your bubble! Current beta is 3.0.2.5 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re[2]: A 'Kill dupes' problem
Hello Dierk, Sunday, November 7, 2004, 11:02:51 AM, among other things, you wrote: Any comments? DH I think it is intentional. I also think it is logical: When I want to DH lock a message (which is what Park does), I don't want to have it DH deleted regardless of a duplicate purge. I disagree. If you want to have a duplicate you can make one, but why would you want to STORE one? -- Best regards, Roger Flying with The Bat!, version 3.0.2.4 Rush, and antispam BayesIt! 0.7.4 on Windows ME, version 3000, Build 90 Current beta is 3.0.2.5 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: A 'Kill dupes' problem
Hello Roger, A reminder of what Roger Phillips typed on: 07 November 2004 at 09:48:53 GMT +0100 RP Any comments? Yes, the idea of parking a message is to protect it from exactly what your trying to do with it, deleting it! RP If it is, 'as designed', then IMHO it should be changed. Please don't, I use it quite a lot and I like the idea of being able to Idiot proof the odd email or two, duplicate or not. -- Best regards,Tony. _ Message composed on 07/11/2004 at 10:44 UTC 2004 - AWB Using The Bat! v3.0.2.5 on Windows XP 5. 1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.0.2.5 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: A 'Kill dupes' problem
Hello Roger! On Sunday, November 7, 2004 at 1:36:31 PM you wrote: I disagree. If you want to have a duplicate you can make one, but why would you want to STORE one? Well, for archival reasons? If ever I intentionally duplicate a message I am quite sure I do want to store it, too. Otherwise I just don't duplicate. Tony may be the better one to tell, as he uses this. -- Dierk Haasis :Dierk: Copy 'n' Concept The Bat 3.0.2.5 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2 Chat info for ICQ, AIM, MSN, Yahoo, Jabber upon request Only the strong survive. Current beta is 3.0.2.5 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: A 'Kill dupes' problem
Hello Dierk, A reminder of what Dierk Haasis typed on: 07 November 2004 at 14:58:47 GMT +0100 DH Tony may be the better one to tell, as he uses this. Occasionally I buy software off the web, The Bat, Time Chaos, Acronis, MailwasherPro, NOD32 and Kerio to name a few. They send me an email with all my registration details, I put it in an archive folder, Park it and don't have to worry about accidentally deleting it. I have deliberately made multiple duplicates of all of these both on CD, SD and USB memory sticks just in case... It's invariably TB! I look to first should I need them. Unlike a lot of people, I delete most of the mail I receive especially when a thread I'm participating in is finished. I then go on a frenzied deletion spree. But there is the occasional one I want to keep so I park it just in case I get too click happy. -- Best regards,Tony. _ Message composed on 07/11/2004 at 14:02 UTC 2004 - AWB Using The Bat! v3.0.2.5 on Windows XP 5. 1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.0.2.5 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: A 'Kill dupes' problem
Hello Tony! On Sunday, November 7, 2004 at 3:17:31 PM you wrote: I put it in an archive folder, Park it and don't have to worry about accidentally deleting it. It's invariably TB! I look to first should I need them. Unlike a lot of people, I delete most of the mail I receive especially when a thread I'm participating in is finished. You do it exactly like me. That makes two needing the feature as it is designed ... -- Dierk Haasis :Dierk: Copy 'n' Concept The Bat 3.0.2.5 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2 Chat info for ICQ, AIM, MSN, Yahoo, Jabber upon request A person who smiles in the face of adversity probably has a scapegoat. (Derek Leveret) Current beta is 3.0.2.5 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: A 'Kill dupes' problem
Hello Roger, On Sun, 7 Nov 2004 14:36:31 +0200 GMT (07/11/2004, 19:36 +0700 GMT), Roger Phillips wrote: RP I disagree. If you want to have a duplicate you can make one, but RP why would you want to STORE one? I wouldn't know, but it would be your decision to store those duplicates, wouldn't it? Why should TB override your decision? -- Cheers, Thomas. Domino vobiscum. (Latin for: The pizza guy is here.) Message reply created with The Bat! 3.0.2.4 Rush under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A Current beta is 3.0.2.5 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: A 'Kill dupes' problem
On Sunday, November 7, 2004, 11:51, Tony Boom wrote: RP If it is, 'as designed', then IMHO it should be changed. Please don't, I use it quite a lot and I like the idea of being able to Idiot proof the odd email or two, duplicate or not. Especially since the kill duplicate procedure has proven not to be 100% reliable. You might remember the discussion about TB! not considering all flags when deciding what is a duplicate and what is not. Imagine one parked copy and one not parked and TB! deciding to kill the wrong copy. I totally agree with Tony, parking should protect a message from any kind of deletion, as far as TB! is able to do it. Do not change this behaviour. -- Regards, Marcus Ohlström Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 PGP Public Key at http://www.canit.se/~marcus/pgp.asc Current beta is 3.0.2.5 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re[2]: A 'Kill dupes' problem
Hello Tony, Sunday, November 7, 2004, 12:51:01 PM, among other things, you wrote: RP Any comments? TB Yes, the idea of parking a message is to protect it from exactly what your TB trying to do with it, deleting it! Yes, I AM aware of the reason for parking! I was only asking about deleting DUPLICATES. RP If it is, 'as designed', then IMHO it should be changed. TB Please don't, I use it quite a lot and I like the idea of being able to TB Idiot proof the odd email or two, duplicate or not. OK you've given a good reason for not changing the system. Hence my reason for asking for comments in the first place before taking any untoward action. I too keep all my archival material as 'parked'. But due to some of the strange and unexpected actions of TB I found that I had also accumulated quite a large number of unsolicited parked duplicates! Thanks to everyone who replied so promptly. -- Best regards, Roger Flying with The Bat!, version 3.0.2.4 Rush, and antispam BayesIt! 0.7.4 on Windows ME, version 3000, Build 90 Current beta is 3.0.2.5 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re[2]: A 'Kill dupes' problem
Hello Tony, Sunday, November 7, 2004, 4:17:31 PM, among other things, you wrote: TB Occasionally I buy software off the web, The Bat, Time Chaos, Acronis, TB MailwasherPro, NOD32 and Kerio to name a few. They send me an email with TB all my registration details, I put it in an archive folder, Park it and TB don't have to worry about accidentally deleting it. TB I have deliberately made multiple duplicates of all of these both on CD, SD TB and USB memory sticks just in case... It's invariably TB! I look to first TB should I need them. Yes, but these 'duplicates' are all stored in different media or different folders. The TB 'Kill dupes' feature only deals with duplicates which occur within a single folder. It does NOT compare the contents of a folder with the contents of any other folder. As proof of this in my own setup let me explain part of it: ALL of my outgoing mail is copied to the 'Sent mail' folder, some of the messages are also copied to one or more folders according to the Addressee, the Subject, or some other identifying feature. Routine maintenance which includes 'Remove duplicates' has never removed any of these multiple copies. They are not duplicates in the sense which 'Kill dupes' operates. TB Unlike a lot of people, I delete most of the mail I receive especially when TB a thread I'm participating in is finished. I then go on a frenzied deletion TB spree. But there is the occasional one I want to keep so I park it just in TB case I get too click happy. I do the same, for the same reasons. But, as I have explained in my other reply to you, TB has created duplicates within a single folder. I'm not certain when this happened but assume it probably occurred during the period when we were all battling to sort out the new filter system and were making numerous tests. Given my comments here, can you give me a good and sensible reason why anybody would want to keep duplicates of a message within the same folder? In response to those who are suggesting that we cannot trust the 'Kill dupes' feature I'd remind them that it is prudent to make a backup before carrying out any cleanup action, in any application. I await your responses with keen anticipation. big grin -- Best regards, Roger Flying with The Bat!, version 3.0.2.4 Rush, and antispam BayesIt! 0.7.4 on Windows ME, version 3000, Build 90 Current beta is 3.0.2.5 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Kill dupes (was Re: Bug in displaying photos from AB)
Hello Richard 1. Improvement of kill duplicates: If you could select which fields TheBat! should compare There is (or at least was!) 2 command line arguments which were used to specify the fields used in a dedup Max added them, and I understand they have been retained. I did report them to the Beta mailing list once. - a search of the archive for posts from me containing /DEDUPIGNORETOMSGID (which is the option I still use).. should find what the other (alternative) command line option was. -- regards, Graham Using The Bat! 2.12 Beta/7 assisted by BayesIt! 0.5.5 under Windows XP 5.1 (Build 2600, Service Pack 1) -- Notice: This e-mail message, together with any attachments, contains information of Merck Co., Inc. (One Merck Drive, Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA 08889), and/or its affiliates (which may be known outside the United States as Merck Frosst, Merck Sharp Dohme or MSD and in Japan, as Banyu) that may be confidential, proprietary copyrighted and/or legally privileged. It is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named on this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete it from your system. -- Current beta is v2.12 Beta/7 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Kill dupes (was Re: Bug in displaying photos from AB)
Hello Graham, Monday, July 5, 2004, 12:50 you wrote at mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 1. Improvement of kill duplicates: If you could select which fields TheBat! should compare There is (or at least was!) 2 command line arguments which were used to specify the fields used in a dedup Thanks for that hint. a search of the archive for posts from me containing /DEDUPIGNORETOMSGID (which is the option I still use).. should find what the other (alternative) command line option was. Respect. Found it. /DEDUPIGNORETOMSGID was the other. But what, if I just want to compare the message ID? But until TheBat! doesn't show me the duplicates before deleting, I'll never use this feature (the risk is too high for me - and I've enough free space :). -- Richard Anders Current beta is v2.12 Beta/7 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Kill dupes
Hello TBBETA, On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 21:09:41 +0700 GMT (13/02/2004, 21:09 +0700 GMT), Thomas Fernandez wrote: When I send private mails from my office, I BCC to myself, so that I get a copy when I download mails at home. By mistake, my address was both in the CC and th BCC. So when I downloaded mails at home, I got two copies. No problem, kill dupes. One of the messages was deleted, as expected. When online at home, I check mail every 10 minutes. The deleted message was downloaded every time! This is still true in 2.04RC/2. Still true with 2.04.4, both under Win98 and XP Pro. Can nobody else confirm this? Send a message to yourself, put your own address into both the CC and the BCC. See how the messages is downloaded again and again at each mailcheck. Since it is happening to me on both computers and under different OS'es, it is either TB itself, or it is my email provider (GMX). I haven't tested it with another provider, but will if nobody can confirm. Thanks. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. The tides are a fight between the Earth and moon. All water tends towards the moon, because there is no water in the moon, and nature abhors a vacuum. I forget where the sun joins in this fight. Message reply created with The Bat! 2.04.4 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using a Pentium P4 1.7 GHz, 256MB RAM Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Kill dupes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thomas Fernandez wrote: Can nobody else confirm this? Send a message to yourself, put your own address into both the CC and the BCC. See how the messages is downloaded again and again at each mailcheck. What do you mean here? That there's always a copy on the server with each check? I can't duplicate this problem and it likely is that you have a filter that's sending back a copy to the server and as a result a delivery loop is underway. - -- Regards, Allie Martin - -- -=allie_M=- | List Moderator PGPKeys: http://key.ac-martin.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.02 iD8DBQFAO38799Uk9gEHIdwRAnySAKDJT2Bn58C9wMxNj18sAZO0crbCCACglmcM NSeC+G2IUVsCw65sqrA4DKk= =pHyc -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Kill dupes
Hello Allie, On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 11:43:46 -0500 GMT (24/02/2004, 23:43 +0700 GMT), Allie Martin wrote: Can nobody else confirm this? Send a message to yourself, put your own address into both the CC and the BCC. See how the messages is downloaded again and again at each mailcheck. What do you mean here? That there's always a copy on the server with each check? I always leave copies on the server for 7 days. When I send messages from my office (I am talking about my private account), I BCC to myself, so I can download it at home. Some message where I reply to all, already have my address in the CC field, so the reply template adds an additional BCC. So that message will be on the server twice, with the same mid. It will be downloaded at home, but one of the two will be marked as Receive in the message despatcher at next check. (I don't usually use the despatcher, but verified this problem that way.) If I take the mark off, it will be set again at next mail check. so the message (one copy of two on the server) will be downloaded again at each mailcheck. I can't duplicate this problem and it likely is that you have a filter that's sending back a copy to the server and as a result a delivery loop is underway. See above. At mailcheck, there is no filter sending it back. Have you verified that the message is on your server twice to begin with? TB checks the UID and not the mid to decide whether a message has been downloaded already. The UID should be different for each of the two copies on the server, so both copies should be downloaded once. I don't know why the Receive flag is set again each time, but only for one of the two existing copies of the message on the server. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. You know that little indestructible black box that is used on planes; why can't they make the whole plane out of the same substance ? Message reply created with The Bat! 2.04.4 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using a Pentium P4 1.7 GHz, 256MB RAM Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Dupes bug
Hello David, On Mon, 4 Aug 2003 at 20:51:18 [GMT +0200] (which was 21:51 where I live) you wrote: DvZ I can forward version 1.51 if you want, or maybe someone can send a DvZ link. On my system that's the newest version that works correct with DvZ the kill dupes functionality. I found it on the web, but it fail removing my dupes ;( Hey, beta-users and developers, an other idea ? -- Regards, Alain The Bat! 2.0 Beta/1 Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3 Current beta is 2.0b1 | Using TBBETA information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Dupes bug
Hello Stefan, I can easily imagine you're really busy working on V2, but I've 3 questions that need to be solved as I can't browse every folder to manually remove every dupes ;-) Is there any reason to have thousand of dupes that aren't detected as dupe ? Do you know if there is a bug report on this problem ? - I try to found one but fail. Do you know if it can be a beta problem (these dupes are mostly created when synchronizing my desktop (1.63b11) with my laptop (1.62)) ? -- Regards, Alain The Bat! 1.63 Beta/11 Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3 Current beta is 1.63b11 | Using TBBETA information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html Current beta is 1.63b11 | Using TBBETA information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Dupes bug
On 2003-07-30 at 13:20:41 Alain de Gevigney wrote: Is there any reason to have thousand of dupes that aren't detected as dupe ? I would guess that they are not precise duplicates, see below. Do you know if it can be a beta problem (these dupes are mostly created when synchronizing my desktop (1.63b11) with my laptop (1.62)) ? For example, if the date and time on your desktop and laptop are not perfectly synchronized (highly likely :), then the messages on the desktop and laptop will have slightly different Received and/or Created dates. This might lead to them not being recognized as duplicates. When you want to check if two messages are the same, you should first do View Source, and then Save As from there. It will slightly differ from the output you get when you do Save As directly from the normal message viewer. pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature Current beta is 1.63b11 | Using TBBETA information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Dupes bug
Alain De Gevigney, [ADG] wrote: ADG Do you know if it can be a beta problem (these dupes are mostly created ADG when synchronizing my desktop (1.63b11) with my laptop (1.62)) ? Synchronising shouldn't lead to messages being duplicated. Synchronization usually just adds what messages the target installation doesn't have when compared to the source installation. At least, this was my experience the last time I did it. -- -= allie_M =- | List Moderator TB! v1.63 Beta/11 on WinXP Pro (SP1) pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature Current beta is 1.63b11 | Using TBBETA information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: dupes
Hello Stefan, On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 at 16:44:26 you wrote: I've thousand of dupes here that aren't detected as dupes SR Same Folder? Yes, of course ;-) -- Regards, Alain The Bat! 1.63 Beta/11 Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3 Current beta is 1.63b11 | Using TBBETA information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: How can I automate Folder -- Kill Dupes?
Hello Dennis, On Sunday, March 17, 2002, at 05:22:39 AM -0700, you wrote the following in regards to How can I automate Folder -- Kill Dupes?: On my Windows 2000 Pro SP2, the ALT key toggles the underlines on and off. Strange indeed. I seemed to have lost all the keyboard shortcuts under the Folder menu, although I'm not sure what you mean by 'underlines', as I've never seen my keyboard shortcuts underlined. Am I missing something here? -- Nick Andriash Courtenay, B.C. Canada -- _ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Wish List : https://bt.ritlabs.com/ BugTraq: https://bt.ritlabs.com/
Re: How can I automate Folder -- Kill Dupes?
Hello Nick, On Sunday, March 17, 2002 at 2:37:04 PM you wrote (at least in part): On my Windows 2000 Pro SP2, the ALT key toggles the underlines on and off. NA Strange indeed. Go to 'Display Settings' in your system (right click on desktop / 'Properties') and choose 'Effects'. 'Hide keyboard navigation indicators until I use the Alt key' deactivated will do the trick. -- Regards Peter Palmreuthermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (The Bat! v1.54 Beta/48 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1) I am Leghorn of Borg. Prepare, ah say, prepare to be assimilated. -- _ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Wish List : https://bt.ritlabs.com/ BugTraq: https://bt.ritlabs.com/
Re: How can I automate Folder -- Kill Dupes?
Hello Allie, 17. marec 2002, 15:41:30, you wrote: ACM Which OS are you running? I think the feature being discussed is ACM available only in WinXP. Win2k has that feature, and I think that WinME, too. And I think that Plus (or some other software) enables this on Win98, too. -- Jernej Simoncic, [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www2.arnes.si/~sopjsimo/ ICQ: 26266467 [The Bat! v1.54 Beta/49 on Windows 98 4.10.. A ] An optimist believes that we live in the best of all possible worlds. A pessimist fears that this is true. -- The Cardinal Conundrum -- _ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Wish List : https://bt.ritlabs.com/ BugTraq: https://bt.ritlabs.com/
Re[2]: Kill dupes function doesn't works
Hello all, MM here they are. PP Saved them, imported them, executed Kill dups on this folder and gee ... PP It does. PP Imported again, executed Kill dups in all Folders and it does too. PP So I'm at the end of my wisdoms if it doesn't for you :-( PP I'm sorry not able to do more, but I have no idea what to try to get it nor PP working. please import this msgbase with 2 same messages and try to kill dupes. Thanks -- Marek Mikus Using the best The Bat! 1.54 Beta/4 under the worst Windows 98 4.10 Build A AMD ThunderBird 1,2 GHz, 256 MB RAM -- __ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Ostatni.zip
Re[2]: Kill dupes function doesn't works
Hello all, Monday, July 30, 2001, Peter Palmreuther wrote: PP Hello Marek, PP On Monday, July 30, 2001 at 11:51:54 AM you wrote (at least in part): MM I will sent You example messages from home. PP Thx ... will do some testings than :-) here they are. -- Bye Marek Mikus Using the best The Bat! 1.54 Beta/4 under the worst Windows 98 4.10 Build A AMD ThunderBird 1,2 GHz, 256 MB RAM -- __ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Sat, 17 Mar 2001 19:19:24 +0100 Dierk Haasis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How come Opera and others call theirs ECMAscript? This is a European standard which was supposed to resolve the incompatibility of various implementations of JavaScript, unfortunately it doesn't. Many sites are still coded for Netscape 4.7x which is the most non-compliant browser, these sites have another set of code to make them work with IE. Opera won't work with either implementation, and the only browser which is fully compliant (NS6) nobody uses What a mess! -- Mark Aston http://www.gunfleet.com http://www.gunfleet.com/linux_links Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-~ Make good on the promise you made at graduation to keep in touch. Classmates.com has over 14 million registered high school alumni--chances are you'll find your friends! http://us.click.yahoo.com/l3joGB/DMUCAA/4ihDAA/CxaWlB/TM -_- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ On Sat, 17 Mar 2001 19:19:24 +0100 Dierk Haasis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How come Opera and others call theirs ECMAscript? This is a European standard which was supposed to resolve the incompatibility of various implementations of JavaScript, unfortunately it doesn't. Many sites are still coded for Netscape 4.7x which is the most non-compliant browser, these sites have another set of code to make them work with IE. Opera won't work with either implementation, and the only browser which is fully compliant (NS6) nobody uses What a mess! -- Mark Aston http://www.gunfleet.com http://www.gunfleet.com/linux_links Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-~ Make good on the promise you made at graduation to keep in touch. Classmates.com has over 14 million registered high school alumni--chances are you'll find your friends! http://us.click.yahoo.com/l3joGB/DMUCAA/4ihDAA/CxaWlB/TM -_- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re[2]: Kill Dupes and Alternatives
Hello Januk, Friday, December 08, 2000, you wrote to me: 1. In some mail lists people are sending copies to private addresses too. As all my mail is filtered I don't really need them. The only way to deal with them is to kill dupes manually. I wonder if there is a way to put it into the filter or folder properties. JA Well by manually, you mean you have to select the menu command once JA every couple of mail checks? If that's what you mean, then yes, you JA have to do it manually. Yes, I meant that. It would be nice to see "kill dupes" option at least in the folder properties. 2. It seems like Alternatives tab is useless in filter properties because I can use "|" in the main tab. JA Depends how fancy you want to get. Suppose I want to look for JA (januk AND canada.com) OR (januk AND something else) Sorry, I was stupid. I never played with Alternatives and didn't realize that they have sets of filter and not just one filter strings. -- Best regards, Peter Gannushkin e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] URL: http://www.downtownmusic.net/ -- -- View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: Kill Dupes and Alternatives
Hello The Bat! beta users and developers, Peter Gannushkin wrote on 12/8/2000, 7:28 PM Peter 1. In some mail lists people are sending copies to private addresses Peter too. As all my mail is filtered I don't really need them. The only Peter way to deal with them is to kill dupes manually. I wonder if there Peter is a way to put it into the filter or folder properties. Create 2 filter (in the following order): The first will catch any mail that really went through the listserver. Condition: if Sender contains [EMAIL PROTECTED] move to TBUDL. The second one will catch the mail that was CC:-d to you: Condition: if Recipient contains [EMAIL PROTECTED] , delete message (Actions tab). Hope that helps -- Cheers, SyP The early bird may get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese. -- -- View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Attached dupes.
Dear TBBETA, I found that when killing dupes, the attached files to the dupes is kept. When A e-mail with an attached file is received, and the file already exists, the file is renamed to 'name1.ext', If the mail is a dupe, the mail is removed, not the file. I know that the file if removed is lost forever, but its a dupe, rigth? =).. Regards, Fredrik Bergstrom -- What has 2000 arms and 2000 legs but no pubic hair? - a Hanson concert. -- -- View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --
Still getting dupes
Hi all, I am still getting duplicated messages from TBBETA. Interestingly, no problems in TBUDL. Confirm? Best regards Istvan Szendro Using The Bat! 1.38 under Windows 98 4.10 -- -- View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --
Re: Still getting dupes
Hello iszendro, Thursday, December 09, 1999, 4:27:54 PM GMT+0800, iszendro wrote: i I am still getting duplicated messages from TBBETA. Interestingly, no i problems in TBUDL. i Confirm? No, I'm not getting dupes on either list. -- Best regards, Thomas. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.38 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 with a Pentium II/350 MHz. -- -- View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --
