Re: anyone know a really GOOD and recent review from a big magazine or so about TB?
On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 18:04:51 -0500, Allie Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In our company we make massive use of public folders, contacts, group calendars and whatnot - thats not the strength of TB. About the only thing you could duplicate is the use of public folders. Though you can't create one, TB! will subscribe to public or shared folders. There's a lot of things you can't do with TB when connected to an Exchange server - that you can do with Outlook. Now I'm *not* an Outlook advocat, but the combination with Exchange is unbeatable, and trying to mimic some of the functionality with any other client looks like a selfmade home improvement solution, no matter how noble the intention is. -- Greetings, Alexander Kunz Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: move a mail to another folder - takes 10+ seconds?
Hallo Samson, On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 22:37:14 -0700GMT (31-8-2004, 7:37 +0200, where I live), you wrote: S the freeze is about 10 sec on the P4 home PC, worse on the P3 (15-20 S sec). S i have noticed this since thebat 2.12 (might be earlier, but 2.12 is S the first version that i started to pay attention to this annoying S thing), and still exists in latest lucky/6. Moving one message doesn't take any time here. Moving 3000+ messages from a 12000+ folder to a 13000+ folder took about 10 seconds on my P4. (tested that with lucky7) So apparently our configs are different in one way or another. I don't use virtual folders, chat folders, common folders, imap or multiple accounts. The AVG plug-in is the only plug-in I'm using. -- Groetjes, Roelof The Bat! 3.0 Beta/1 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 1 pop3 account, server on LAN Disclaimer: Any opinion stated in this message is not necessarily shared by my budgies or rabbits. Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: anyone know a really GOOD and recent review from a big magazine or so about TB?
Alexander S. Kunz, [ASK] wrote: There's a lot of things you can't do with TB when connected to an Exchange server - that you can do with Outlook. Now I'm *not* an Outlook advocat, but the combination with Exchange is unbeatable, and trying to mimic some of the functionality with any other client looks like a selfmade home improvement solution, no matter how noble the intention is. Yeah. We're on the same page and this is why I wrote in my message: The problem is really the choice of server software and if it's Exchange then Outlook beats other solutions in terms of optimization for use with Exchange. IOW's if Exchange is the server, the Outlook is the 'hand fitting in glove' solution for it. -- Allie Martin [List Moderator and fellow end-user] · My PGP-Keys: http://key.ac-martin.com · The Bat! v3.0 Beta/1 · Windows XP Pro (Service Pack 2) . 1200 bps used to seem so fast pgpdtsBavLzz3.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
folder to hold 100 most recent messages?
Hi List, Is there a way to have a folder hold the 100 most recent list messages, and move the older messages to another folder? The reason is that I use IMAP, and I would like to have an IMAP folder to provide access to the most recent posts so I can view them from anywhere, but I don't want the folder to grow too big, since my IMAP space is limited. Therefor, I'd like to move older messages (100 messages old, or one week old, for example) to a local folder as needed. -- Chris Using The Bat! v2.13 Lucky Beta/6 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
v3.0 b1
i notice my registration key no longer works for this version... Will I have to purchase another one ? -- Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
What does red envelope icon mean?
Simple (hopefully) question... In the message list pane, what does a red (or pink) envelope icon indicate?? It's the same icon as the normal unread and rewad envelope icons, only red. -- Thanks, Rick I believe in getting into hot water; it keeps you clean. - G.K. Chesterton Using The Bat! version 2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 :flag-usa: Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: What does red envelope icon mean?
Hallo Rick, On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 13:34:56 -0400GMT (31-8-2004, 19:34 +0200, where I live), you wrote: RF In the message list pane, what does a red (or pink) envelope icon RF indicate?? It's the same icon as the normal unread and rewad envelope RF icons, only red. As I'm a tad challenged in the colorviewing department, I'm not sure, but I guess it's an urgent message. X-Priority=1 or =high, something like that. Should be visible in the headers. -- Groetjes, Roelof The Bat! 3.0 Beta/1 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 1 pop3 account, server on LAN Disclaimer: Any opinion stated in this message is not necessarily shared by my budgies or rabbits. pgpaz25s4Cz5b.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: v3.0 b1
Critter said: i notice my registration key no longer works for this version... Will I have to purchase another one ? Unfortunately, it seems the answer is yes. You will have to purchase another one.:( Needless to say, it appears A LOT of people are not impressed with this decision. Further discussion on this topic can be found here: http://www.mail-archive.com/tbbeta%40thebat.dutaint.com/ -- Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: What does red envelope icon mean?
Hi Zeynel, Tuesday, August 31, 2004, 1:40:26 PM, you wrote: ZAÖ Hello Rick, ZAÖ Tuesday, August 31, 2004, 8:34:56 PM, you wrote: RF In the message list pane, what does a red (or pink) envelope icon RF indicate?? It's the same icon as the normal unread and rewad envelope RF icons, only red. ZAÖ It's high priority mail like this one. Thanks! I asked because I saw it in my junk mail folder. Spammers are sending junk mail with high priority? That's just great! -- Take it easy, Rick Don't use a big word where a diminutive one will suffice. Using The Bat! version 2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 :flag-usa: Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: What does red envelope icon mean?
Hallo Rick, On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 13:52:59 -0400GMT (31-8-2004, 19:52 +0200, where I live), you wrote: RF Thanks! I asked because I saw it in my junk mail folder. Spammers are RF sending junk mail with high priority? That's just great! Yes, they're also using low priority. Everything uncommon attracts attention. -- Groetjes, Roelof The Bat! 3.0 Beta/1 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 1 pop3 account, server on LAN Disclaimer: Any opinion stated in this message is not necessarily shared by my budgies or rabbits. pgpZmKTpQrYEi.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: folder to hold 100 most recent messages?
Hello Christopher Brown, 31-Aug-2004 19:23, you wrote: Is there a way to have a folder hold the 100 most recent list messages, and move the older messages to another folder? The reason is that I use IMAP, and I would like to have an IMAP folder to provide access to the most recent posts so I can view them from anywhere, but I don't want the folder to grow too big, since my IMAP space is limited. Therefor, I'd like to move older messages (100 messages old, or one week old, for example) to a local folder as needed. I don't know how that will work with IMAP (I have no IMAP account, makes no sense for my private mail usage), but virtual folders have a filter Age that allows filtering by greater than/less than/equal than + a number of days. Being a virtual folder, it would be entirely dynamic without the need to move mails around. Now that doesn't exactly provide a solution for your wish to download older messages, but maybe it is a start? -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) I never forget a face ...but in your case I'll be glad to make an exception. -- Groucho Marx Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: v3.0 b1
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 18:45:22 +0100 (BST), AceMan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Unfortunately, it seems the answer is yes. You will have to purchase another one.:( ah well, that sucks. is my tb gonna die, if i go back a version now? -- Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: v3.0 b1
Hallo Critter, On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 14:45:22 -0400GMT (31-8-2004, 20:45 +0200, where I live), you wrote: C ah well, that sucks. is my tb gonna die, if i go back a version now? No. However when you've changed your account settings in the latest beta cycle (starting from 2.13), you will loose those settings, since the account info is stored in a different file. (account.cfn instead of account.cfg) Most dramatic would be if you'd added a new account in 2.13/3.0 -- Groetjes, Roelof The Bat! 3.0 Beta/1 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 1 pop3 account, server on LAN Disclaimer: Any opinion stated in this message is not necessarily shared by my budgies or rabbits. pgpcnuJR0XPkO.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: v3.0 b1
Hi Critter, on Tue, 31 Aug 2004 14:45:22 -0400GMT, you wrote: C is my tb gonna die, if i go back a version now? Certainly not. You can use version 2.x as long as you please without having to obtain a new key. -- Cheers Peter Keyboard not found. Press F1 to continue. Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: What does red envelope icon mean?
Hi Rick, On Tuesday, August 31, 2004 13:34 your local time, which was 18:34 my local time, Rick Friedman [RF] wrote; RF In the message list pane, what does a red (or pink) envelope icon RF indicate?? It's the same icon as the normal unread and rewad envelope RF icons, only red. Well, I guess you're talking about POP mail, as message priority doesn't work for IMAP mail! :-( Although, if you want to air your concerns about the lack of support for this basic feature in IMAP, add you comments here on bugtracker; https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=3411 -- Regards, Chris Created using The Bat! v2.13 Lucky Beta/6 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Cleaning up SPAM with Bayes Filter Plugin v1.5.1b Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: v3.0 b1
Hello AceMan, 31-Aug-2004 19:45, you wrote: Needless to say, it appears A LOT of people are not impressed with this decision. Further discussion on this topic can be found here: http://www.mail-archive.com/tbbeta%40thebat.dutaint.com/ I'm not getting any wiser reading that. Can anyone shed some light on the issue? Whats going on? -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) Ice Water? Get some Onions - that'll make your eyes water! -- Groucho Marx Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: folder to hold 100 most recent messages?
Hello Christopher, On 31 August 2004, 10:23 -0700 (18:23 local time) Christopher Brown [CB] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: CB Is there a way to have a folder hold the 100 most recent list CB messages, and move the older messages to another folder? Yes, but... CB The reason is that I use IMAP, and I would like to have an IMAP CB folder to provide access to the most recent posts so I can view them CB from anywhere, but I don't want the folder to grow too big, since my CB IMAP space is limited. Therefor, I'd like to move older messages CB (100 messages old, or one week old, for example) to a local folder CB as needed. I've not done this with IMAP... and it looks like it's not possible since there's no option to keep messages in base for n days with IMAP. This is what I do with POP3: Go into the IMAP folder Properties and select the Deletion tab. Check the Use folder-specific deletion settings and then for Alternative deletion specify the alternative folder. Then setup the maximum number of messages stored and/or number of days you want to keep messages in the folder. -- Best regards, Martin Webster Jabber mjw | ICQ 15893823 Quote of the day: We haven't the money, so we've got to think. LORD RUTHERFORD, 1871-1937 Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: v3.0 b1
Needless to say, it appears A LOT of people are not impressed with this decision. Further discussion on this topic can be found here: http://www.mail-archive.com/tbbeta%40thebat.dutaint.com/ I'm not getting any wiser reading that. Can anyone shed some light on the issue? Whats going on? Well, this is merely my take on it but, to cut a long story short TB! v3 (Yes, that's right. Final release apparently) is out tomorrow. Bugs still remain in v2 (and considering Beta 1 of v3 came out yesterday, it is assumed v3 *probably* contains a fair few bugs too) Supposedly promised features for v2 will now not be delivered for v2. Registered users are expected to pay for the upgrade to v3.bugs included. :( -- Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Access Violation when I try to PGP sign or encrypt + nothing happens when I try to decrypt/verify
Hi Trying to PGP sign or encrypt has started giving me Access Violation at address 00404044 in module 'thebat.exe'. Read of address F28B12E7. This was happening very occasionally but is now all the time. After starting TB I can decrypt/verify messages. If I try to sign or encrypt one it goes through all the motions of selecting signing key, asking for passphrase (if not cached), selecting keys to encrypt to etc. Then nothing happens. The edit message window stays open and the message is not sent. From that point onwards, pressing the button to decrypt a message or verify a signature does nothing either. Trying to send the message again (or another) gives the access violation.This is only if using the built-in support with pgp (8.0.3). I can still use PGP's current window functionality and I can still send non-pgp messages. Trying to access the openpgp preferences dialog gives a different access violation message:Access Violation at address 02904ED2 in module 'PGPSDK.dll'. Read of address 02A8800C. Any ideas what has happened and how to resolve? -- Best regards, MFPA mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.11.02 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: folder to hold 100 most recent messages?
Hello Christopher, The reason is that I use IMAP, and I would like to have an IMAP folder to provide access to the most recent posts so I can view them from anywhere, but I don't want the folder to grow too big, since my IMAP space is limited. Therefor, I'd like to move o lder messages (100 messages old, or one week old, for example) to a local folder as needed. I don't know if it will work on IMAP because I don' use and haven't even tried IMAP. What I do in some of my POP folders is to Use folder specific deletion settings, which you can find in the Deletion tab of the folder properties. When you tick this option the possibilities are displayed. Then select Alternative deletion to move message to your 'archive' folder and also select use alternative deletion to purge this folder. This way, if in the General tan of folder properties you have selected to Keep messages in base let's say for 7 days, when you do a purge and compress (which I do daily) your messages older than 7 says are moved to the archive folder. Hope I've made it clear enough. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v2.12.00 Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
...misprint...
There is a misprint in http://www.ritlabs.com/en/about/about.php The misprint is: A deep understanding of our customers real needs and the pleasure of working with our products is an obligatory feature and is also our trademark. We prefer to make everything of a high quality or not to make it at all. -- St Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Refund Claim
I just filled out a Refund Claim form over at element5. According to element5, refunds must be approved by the software publisher. Upon receipt, we will forward your refund request to the software publisher who will then authorize the refund within 2 business days. Approved refunds will be processed immediately, and will be confirmed by e-mail. ...waiting... -- St Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Access Violation when I try to PGP sign or encrypt + nothing happens when I try to decrypt/verify
Hi Tuesday, August 31, 2004, 10:34:40 PM, Mike email (The Bat!) wrote: MeTB Hi MeTB Trying to PGP sign or encrypt has started giving me MeTB Access Violation at address 00404044 in module 'thebat.exe'. MeTB Read of address F28B12E7. MeTB This was happening very occasionally but is now all the MeTB time. MeTB After starting TB I can decrypt/verify messages. If I try to MeTB sign or encrypt one it goes through all the motions of selecting MeTB signing key, asking for passphrase (if not cached), selecting MeTB keys to encrypt to etc. Then nothing happens. The edit message MeTB window stays open and the message is not sent. MeTB From that point onwards, pressing the button to decrypt a MeTB message or verify a signature does nothing either. MeTB Trying to send the message again (or another) gives the access MeTB violation.This is only if using the built-in support with pgp MeTB (8.0.3). I can still use PGP's current window functionality and MeTB I can still send non-pgp messages. MeTB Trying to access the openpgp preferences dialog gives a MeTB different access violation message:Access Violation at address MeTB 02904ED2 in module 'PGPSDK.dll'. Read of address 02A8800C. MeTB Any ideas what has happened and how to resolve? Forgot to add that once I have the access violation message, when I close down TB, part way through the shutdown I get the dialog box about encountering a problem and needing to shut down, often with an invitation to send details to Microsoft. -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.11.02 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: BayesIt download?
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 23:59:29 +0200, Andre Wichartz wrote: Hello Peter, On 24 Aug 2004 at 16:58:43 -0400 GMT [22:58 CEST] you wrote: PK Where can I find the latest version of BayesIt for download? PK The site given in Plugin-BayesIt is a Russian language page of Ritlab. PK TIA http://www.ritlabs.com/download/bayesit/bayesit0511.rar I have downloaded 053 from the ritlabs site: Version 0.5.3 [http://www.ritlabs.com/download/bayesit/bayesit053.rar] (20.04.2004) - when installing from The Bat! preferences menu it was necessary to configure the filter manually. Now it assumes all default settings itself. - The window about can't create folder were shown in some false cases. + The filter assumes it's interface language during installation and tries to load appropriate language from the file bayesit.lng. The file is checked in the filter's working folder, filter's program folder, The Bat's program folder and finaly in the main The Bat! mail folder. * some strings in English interface were changed and official source files for translators are now commited to CVS. Together with previous feature it makes BayesIt easy-localizable. Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB and XP new SP2...
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 00:32:03 +0200, MAU wrote: I don't use XP, but in a daily security newsletter I get they recommend delaying (or blocking) the installation of SP2 because some applications may cease to work. I use Office, TB, MS Streets Trips, a few imaging programs, a fefw newsreaders.. no problem here ( so far :) Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: v3.0 b1
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 22:00:49 +0100, AceMan wrote: Needless to say, it appears A LOT of people are not impressed with this decision. Further discussion on this topic can be found here: http://www.mail-archive.com/tbbeta%40thebat.dutaint.com/ I'm not getting any wiser reading that. Can anyone shed some light on the issue? Whats going on? Well, this is merely my take on it but, to cut a long story short TB! v3 (Yes, that's right. Final release apparently) is out tomorrow. it's out, I'm running it :) Bugs still remain in v2 (and considering Beta 1 of v3 came out yesterday, it is assumed v3 *probably* contains a fair few bugs too) so mush for a long beta cycle :) Supposedly promised features for v2 will now not be delivered for v2. I haven't heard this yet. Registered users are expected to pay for the upgrade to v3.bugs included. unless they send you a registration key... Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB and XP new SP2...
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 00:05:00 +0200, WilWilWil wrote: I see in the footer of some mails that some of you use TB on XP with new Service Pack 2. Have you seen some troubles with TB 2.12 or higher under SP2 ? Is this SP2 really necessary for people who don't use use microsoft Outlook and Internet Explorer with all his holes of security ? Because this upgrade seems to be very heavy ! I have SP2 installed, and have used all the new V2.13 betas, the V3.0 Beta/1 and now the V3.0 final version, without a problem. Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
TB! v3 (Was: Re: v3.0 b1)
Well, this is merely my take on it but, to cut a long story short TB! v3 (Yes, that's right. Final release apparently) is out tomorrow. it's out, I'm running it :) Yes, I'm trying it out now too. I'll reserve judgement on it for now :) (TBH, I thought it was a misprint or something and that it wouldn't *really* be out tomorrow/today ;) Bugs still remain in v2 (and considering Beta 1 of v3 came out yesterday, it is assumed v3 *probably* contains a fair few bugs too) so mush for a long beta cycle :) LOL. Indeed. Must have been some helluva internal beta test ;) Supposedly promised features for v2 will now not be delivered for v2. I haven't heard this yet. True. This is hearsay at this point. I should have made that clearer. Sorry :) Registered users are expected to pay for the upgrade to v3.bugs included. unless they send you a registration key... Well, we can't all be that lucky! I guess the rest of us are expected to cough up if we want it :) Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Is the The BAT! 3.0 released?
G'day TBUDL Members, Is there a new version 3.0 released? RitLabs site has it featured on http://www.ritlabs.com/en/products/thebat/ but any attempt to access what's new details, or other information about it just leads to a page in Cyrillic characters. -- Bob Mo®®is Wednesday, 1 September 2004 Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows 98 4.10 Build B Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Third time is a charm?
I can't believe it. It's hardly a year since version 2 came out and I was wondering why there were so few minor releases in the last weeks. Now RITLabs is releasing version 3 without functioning IMAP support in V2 (promised) and a whole load of new, unfixed bugs introduced. This is a slap in the face of all users - to get bugs fixed now (in software you paid for) you have to get the next version. I suppose version 4 will be out six months from now, and version 5 three months after that? After which you'll be paying for minor releases? But hey, it's going to be 50% off if you bought all the previous versions! I'm very angered right now. Roman Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: problems w. multiple user accounts (user / admin) in win xp home
Hi Monday, August 30, 2004, 10:37:12 PM, Chris wrote: First, turn off Simple File Sharing. I'm pretty sure you don't have seen a Windows XP Home yet :-) There is no Simple File Sharing in Home. C I completely forgot that Windows XP Home (AKA, Windows XP Crippled) C doesn't let you modify permissions without jumping through hoops. There is a command line utility called CACLS that can be used to edit permissions. Open a command window and cd to whatever path you need. Then cacls *.* /t /e /g Users:f to give users full access (I think) Google for CACLS for more info as I can't remember where I found it -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.11.02 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: TB! v3 (Was: Re: v3.0 b1)
Hi Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 4:16:29 AM, Jack Morrison wrote: JM 2. What exactly *are* the differences between the Home Edition and the JM Professional Edition? The Professional Edition is twice the size (8.2M as opposed to 4.0) -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.11.02 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[5]: Addressing email
Hi Sunday, August 15, 2004, 1:20:26 AM, rich gregory wrote: rg How, [do] you enter the 2 handles to begin with? Did you use ANY rg keystroke(s) at all to indicate to TB! that it had correctly rg guessed the correct email address by it's handle? rg Once the TO: line had been populated with the full email address, what rg did you do to get the second handle in there without destroying the rg auto-entered (and already correct) address from the first handle you rg typed in? rg I pressed comma, a most natural thing, which destroys the auto-entered rg correct address. rg If you had to make ANY keystrokes at all, why NOT allow the comma? SC Did you try: Start typing first name, when correct address appears SC push Right Arrow then the comma, and then start typing the second SC name. Not sure if this addresses the whole thread, but it seems to let SC you enter two addresses and still use auto fill. rg My point exactly, you have to hit TWO keys to get it done. rg Why would TB! think that a comma, entered on the address line, might rg mean anything else other than The address, as is, is already rg correct? For exactly the reason Roelof described above in his Doe, John example. On the other hand I can think of no reason not to allow a semi-colon, which (to me) is the natural thing to use.. -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.11.02 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Mime Preamble
Hi, Since upgrading from version 1, I've noticed TB is not showing any MIME Preambles. To test, I sent a MIME email with a preamble to a TB address and an Outlook Express address. OE shows the preamble when I view the message source, and TB doesn't. Does anyone know why this change has occurred and what to do about getting to see the preamble? -- Russell Robinson (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) Author of Tectite (CRM and Licensing for Software Developers) Download your free CRM from: http://www.tectite.com/ Using The Bat! v2.10.03 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
