Re: [Query] Norton AntiVirus and The Bat!

[Jack S. LaRosa]

Hello David,

Tuesday, November 2, 2004, 7:18:19 PM, you wrote:

DMD> Hello, everyone.

DMD> I apologize for bringing up the subject of Norton
DMD> AntiVirus (NAV) and The Bat!, again -- but one
DMD> serious concern I have is that Norton AntiVirus does
DMD> not work with The Bat!, which causes concern about
DMD> registering The Bat!.

Although I can't offer any suggestions as to remedying your problem, I
can tell you that I am currently running Norton System Works 2003
version 6.01 build 57 with no problems. I purchased this version
shortly after it came out but was never able to get it to install
properly on my Sony Viao desktop running Win98. However, I kept it
around and ultimately loaded it this machine which runs Win XP Pro as
you can see below.

Fortunately it hasn't caught any infected incoming email in quite a
while (that was actually the previous version 2002 running on the
aformentioned Sony) but my address book is quite small so I do not
have a lot of email traffic. It *does* display a progress bar on all
outgoing emails and I have never been contacted by anyone claiming I
sent them an infected email.

If I can provide any other information please don't hesitate to
contact me.

-- 

Best regards,
 Jackmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Now running TB! v2.11.02 from
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 - Service Pack 2




Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: One filter in a group triggering

[Robin Anson]

On Wed 3 November 2004, 12:34:12 +1000, Ian A. White wrote:
> one problem is that the conditions for the sub-filters
> can see one message trigger two or more filters. Setting them to
> continue sees it continue with the remaining sub-filters. What I would
> like is something like an exit command so that as soon as one
> condition is met in a group of sub-filters, the remaining sub-filters
> are ignored even if they might match.

Which I think is why Miguel suggested the subfilters should NOT be set
to continue processing. This is then the exit command from the group of
subfilters.

Doesn't that work for you?

If you still have problems, can you tell us the conditions you are
checking for and the outcomes you want.

-- 
Robin

Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2




Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: Total Commander

[z5worg]

Tuesday, November 02, 2004, Mica Mijatovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> 
>> Sorry, I've not seen previous mails of this topic : what is Total
>> Commander ?

> It's a small, fast and very powerful two-windowed file (but also ftp)
> manager, with many useful plug-ins. 

Is there anyone here using TC in WinXP-Home?  I find that "Copy" in TC
will no longer copy "system" and some other files.  Is that the ways
it is?  Or can I get around it?

-- 
Thanks in advance
JM


Using The Bat! 1.62r
Under Windows 98 4.10 Build   A 



Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: Version 3.x

[z5worg]

Tuesday, November 02, 2004, Roelof Otten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 00:33:15 -0500GMT (1-11-2004, 6:33 +0100, where I
> live), you wrote:

> ..

Z>> 2.  Will the backup/restore copy all configurations, accounts,
Z>> filters, etc. from v1.x to 3.x?

> There's no need to do any backup/restore during the upgrade. You
> should be able to install v3 on top of v1 without any problems.

I am thinking of installing v3 on a new computer ONLY; and would keep
and use v1.62 on my current computer until I determine whether I
want to switch to v3 permanently.

> Some config files changed.
> folder info:   account.flx -> account.flb
> account info:  account.cfg -> account.cfn
> filters:   account.srx -> account.srb

> ...

-- 
Thanks in advance
JM

Using The Bat! 1.62r
Under Windows 98 4.10 Build   A 



Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: [Query] Norton AntiVirus and The Bat!

[Allie Martin]

On Tuesday, November 02, 2004 at 8:33:59 PM [GMT -0500], Code 2 wrote:

> It has caught dozens of infected incoming e-mails.  No infected
> outgoing mail, yet, so I can only assume the scanning of outgoing mail
> is working.

One thing you could do is to try sending yourself an infected message.
:) The Eicar test virus is there to test with.

-- 
-= Allie =-
. You cannot achieve the impossible without attempting the absurd.
__
Using The Bat!™ v3.0.1.33 for IMAP mail
IMAP Server: MDaemon Pro | OS: Windows XP Pro (Service Pack 2)






Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: [Query] Norton AntiVirus and The Bat!

[Code 2]

DMD> I apologize for bringing up the subject of Norton AntiVirus (NAV)
DMD> and The Bat!, again -- but one serious concern I have is that
DMD> Norton AntiVirus does not work with The Bat!, which causes
DMD> concern about registering The Bat!. (I am still dealing with some
DMD> other problems with Cyrillic text, but I want to focus on one
DMD> problem per list message.) ;-)

DMD> Every other e-mail program that I have tried works
DMD> well with NAV. One nice feature of NAV is that it
DMD> scans outgoing messages for viruses. When I send a
DMD> message with any other e-mail client, except The
DMD> Bat!, a progress bar appears, showing that NAV is
DMD> scanning the message before sending it.

I use Norton AntiVirus with The Bat! and have no problems.  I have it
set to scan both incoming and outgoing mail, but I have the progress
indicator turned off.

It has caught dozens of infected incoming e-mails.  No infected
outgoing mail, yet, so I can only assume the scanning of outgoing mail
is working.

-- 
Code 2  :canadaflag:  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Bat! version 2.12.00 on Windows XP Service Pack 2
Inside a bowling alley: Please be quiet. We need to hear a pin drop.




Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

[Query] Norton AntiVirus and The Bat!

[David M. Dickerson]

Hello, everyone.
I apologize for bringing up the subject of Norton
AntiVirus (NAV) and The Bat!, again -- but one
serious concern I have is that Norton AntiVirus does
not work with The Bat!, which causes concern about
registering The Bat!. (I am still dealing with some
other problems with Cyrillic text, but I want to
focus on one problem per list message.) ;-)
Does The Bat! require a antiviral plug-ins for
protection?
Every other e-mail program that I have tried works
well with NAV. One nice feature of NAV is that it
scans outgoing messages for viruses. When I send a
message with any other e-mail client, except The
Bat!, a progress bar appears, showing that NAV is
scanning the message before sending it.
On Symantec's Web site, there is one knowledge base
article about NAV 2001 and The Bat! 1.X that
describes a way to use NAV 2001 with that earlier
version of The Bat!, by interfacing with a "Norton"
POP3 domain. Of course, the domain is now 'symantec'
and this workaround does not work with more current
versions of NAV or The Bat! 3.X. (Can you imagine
Symantec giving away such a service these days!) :-)
When I made this inquiry earlier, I received some
public and private responses telling me to switch
from Norton System Works Professional and to use
another antivirus product that has a plug-in for The
Bat!, but the Symantec product is what I have and
licensing The Bat! is going to be a huge financial
strain on me, without purchasing another antivirus
product. (I am searching for another technical-
writing job, so finances are a major concern, but
The Bat! is an impressive product and TBUDL is a
wonderful resource -- and I hope to contribut to the
documentation project for The Bat!, once I move on
from the stage of "total neophyte [idiot]" with The
Bat!) ;-)
In addition, I assume that running two antivirus
products is poor practice and it would definitely be
a drain on system resources. Even if I found a free
antivirus product with a plug-in for The Bat!, I
would have to keep it updated and run scans, just as
I do with NAV, which does provide automatic updates.
Therefore, I have the issue of system maintenance to
consider.
I am not trying to start a controversy, but simply
to find a solution. My searches of the Web have
proven fruitless. I have contacted Symantec support
and received an automated reply promising a reply
within four to five days, but that time period has
lapsed.
Based upon the progress bar that I see when I send
e-mail from other clients, it appears that NAV is
not scanning The Bat!'s outgoing messages (and I
want to be a good "netizen"). :-) Of course, NAV
does not indicated that it is scanning incoming
messages, unless one has a virus, and -- "knock on
wood" -- I have not had this problem.
I would be very grateful for any information or
suggestions.
Thank you very much, in advance!
Cordially,
David
--
http://ddickerson.igc.org/
_
Is your PC infected? Get a FREE online computer virus scan from McAfee® 
Security. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963


Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: One filter in a group triggering

[MAU]

Hello Ian,

RO>> Try to create a filter with the 'continue processing' bit set. Set
RO>> all of your colour group filters as subfilters of this parent
RO>> filter. See if that does what you want. Of course I don't give any
RO>> guarantees, the NFS is still new for me too. ;-)
> 
> Thanks for the suggestion, but it did not work.

I think it should work Ian. Are you sure you set up this structure?

Parent Filter (*) (**)
Sub F. 1: If A Set Colour Group 1 (***)
Sub F. 2: If B Set Colour Group 2 (***)
Sub F. 3: If C Set Colour Group 3 (***)

Where:
(*)   With a condition that will _always_ trigger (so that subfilters will
  be executed) and with _no_ action.
(**)  Set to 'Continue processing with other filters'
(***) _NOT_ set to 'Continue processing with other filters'

I'll test it as soon as I can, but it _should_ work.

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.4 Rush






Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Total Commander

[Mica Mijatovic]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

   ***^\ ."_)~~
 ~( __ _"o   Was another beautiful day, Tue, 2 Nov 2004,
   @  @  at 20:26:54 +0100, when WilWilWil wrote:

MW>> Thanks for the pointer. Another tool I didn't know about...

> Sorry, I've not seen previous mails of this topic : what is Total
> Commander ?

It's a small, fast and very powerful two-windowed file (but also ftp)
manager, with many useful plug-ins. 

- --
Mica
PGP key uploaded at:  once just before breakfast
<>o<>
[Earth LOG: 62 day(s) since v3.0 unleashing]
OS: Windows 98 SE Micro Lite Professional IVa Enterprise Millennium
with nestled ZipSlack(tm) 9.1 UMSDOS Linux;
and, for TB sometimes Libranet (Linux) 2.8.1, via Cross Over Office
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

iD8DBQFBiAfU9q62QPd3XuIRAmulAJ91ECvowlBqcA/QLsCf1tfwGo2xaQCfbMo+
XXuYTlu1n5aBiUvpvzkED8Q=
=74iY
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Difference(s) Between The Bat! 3.0's Two Versions

[David M. Dickerson]

Hello, Mica!
Thank you very much for your response to the message
that I posted to you on TBUDL (13 October 2004)!
On Monday, 1 November 2004 2:31 PM, Mica Mijatovic wrote:
MM> ...No, *I* have to apologize, since the missive of
MM> mine I am prone to accept as the well of confusion,
MM> partly due to my deep thoughts, and partly due to
MM> my shallow English I try to express them and offer
MM> to the world by.
MM>
MM> My best wishes to you. (:
I appreciate the detail and courtesy of your reply, Mica!
I do not feel that you owe me an apology. :-) I thank you
for your best wishes -- and I extend mine to you and your
loved ones!
Such occasional confusion is to be expected on a discussion
list with people from all over the world writing in English,
which may not necessarily their native language.
Your English is certainly not "shallow," Mica, and I offer
my congratulations to your on your clearly written message,
about which you obviously gave much serious thought.
I think that, for the most part, we excuse each other for
such misunderstandings in an electronic and international
community, such as TBUDL. (We should strive for such a
goal, at the very least.)
I am very ignorant about The Bat! and I am still evaluating
the program. The evaluation has become problematic primarily
because of two factors, which I will address in a separate
message to the list.
Thank you, again, Mica. You are truly a gentleman, and your
"deep thoughts" are an admirable quality and an asset to our
discussions! :-)
With warmest regards --
Cordially,
David
--
http://ddickerson.igc.org/
_
FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar – get it now! 
http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/


Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[3]: Bayesit

[Dick H]

Hello MikeD,


On Tuesday, November 02, 2004 at 10:56:50 GMT -0500 (which was
16:56:50 where I live), MikeD (3) wrote and made these valuable points
on the subject of "Bayesit":

> Hello Dan,

> Tuesday, November 2, 2004, 8:46:34 AM, you wrote:

DG>> Tue, 2 Nov 2004 13:31:10 +0200 (6:31 AM EST here) Dave Thomas wrote:

>>> Where do I find the link to the latest [Bayesit] version

> www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/bayesit/bayesit073.rar

Here is a more recent version: www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/bayesit/bayesit074.rar


-- 
Best regards,
 Dick

___

Using The Bat! v3.0.2.4 Rush + BayesIt! 0.7.4 on Windows XP 5.1 Build  2600 Service 
Pack 1



Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Checking every Content-type header in filters

[Anthony G. Atkielski]

How do I get a filter to check _every_ Content-type header in a message
for specific content, instead of just the first one?

-- 
Anthony
__
Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 



Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: [the_bat] Re[2]: Total Commander

[Michael Acklin]

Tuesday, November 2, 2004, 1:26:54 PM, (Internet Time - @852) you wrote:

Hello WilWilWil,

W> Sorry, I've not seen previous mails of this topic : what is Total Commander ?

Here is the message that Alexander Kunz posted a few days ago about
Total Commander.

===QUOTE

Hello Thomas Fernandez & everyone else

31-Okt-2004 04:34, you wrote:

> So Data1.cab is part of the MSI file, not some part of XP Pro?

Yes. If you happen to be a user of Total Commander (I couldn't live without
it *g* http://www.ghisler.com), you can use MSI files like ZIP archives
with a plugin: http://ghisler.fileburst.com/plugins/msi_plugin.zip

===END QUOTE=

Hope this helps...


-- 
Best regards,
 Michael   :texasflag:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Daily Bible Verses at http://freeop.blogspot.com/

Registered Linux User #367776

"Go cry on someone else's shoulder, I'm off-duty." * Troi



Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: Total Commander

[WilWilWil]

MW> Thanks for the pointer. Another tool I didn't know about...

Sorry, I've not seen previous mails of this topic : what is Total Commander ?

-- 
WilWilWil 
:flag-france:


TB 3.0.1.33
BayesIt! 0.7.3
Windows XP
Service Pack 1

Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: Toolbar button too large...

[WilWilWil]

SC>  Not possible with the old glyph bitmap, but it is possible with the
SC>  new Version 3 graphics and batskin.ini .

I've got a lot of .INI in my folders in TB, but no such a batskin.ini. (I use TB3)

-- 
WilWilWil 
:flag-france:


TB 3.0.1.33
BayesIt! 0.7.3
Windows XP
Service Pack 1

Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

More support for Pro version users ?

[WilWilWil]

Hello,

It's just an idea and I don't want to offend Ritlabs team, but when I used TB2.12 
Home, it was pretty difficult to obtain support.

I've registered TB3 PRO last week. In the morning I had a problem. I asked Support for 
help. 10 minutes after my problem was solved.

Great and powerful support. I must say Bravo and thank Ritlabs Team... But I am 
suspicious

So ? Is support better than it was in the past or Pro version users have priority ?

Am I clear-sighted or twisted ? 

I apologize to Ritlabs Support Team if the answer is I am twisted.  ;-)


-- 
WilWilWil 
:flag-france:

TB 3.0.1.33
BayesIt! 0.7.3
Windows XP
Service Pack 1

Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Toolbar button too large...

[Stuart Cuddy]

Hello WilWilWil,
Tuesday, November 2, 2004, 1:04:43 PM, you wrote:

W> Is there a way to choose small icons for main tool bar of TB3 ?
W> Ok, I need glasses to work but I' m not so blind !

W> I don't want to change all TB3 icons, reason why I do not want to replace 
glyph.bmp...

W> If not possible, SO knows if it will be an available feature in the future ?

 Not possible with the old glyph bitmap, but it is possible with the
 new Version 3 graphics and batskin.ini .

-- 
 Stuartmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.4 Rush on Windows 98 4.10 Build   A 



Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Toolbar button too large...

[WilWilWil]

Hello,

Is there a way to choose small icons for main tool bar of TB3 ? Ok, I need glasses to 
work but I' m not so blind !

I don't want to change all TB3 icons, reason why I do not want to replace glyph.bmp...

If not possible, SO knows if it will be an available feature in the future ?

-- 
WilWilWil 
:flag-france:

TB 3.0.1.33
BayesIt! 0.7.3
Windows XP
Service Pack 1

Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: HTML displaying in V.3.01

[John Phillips]

Hi Roelof,
On Tue, 2 Nov 2004, at 12:40:07 [GMT+0100] (which was 22:40:07 Australian
Eastern Time) you wrote:



JP>> This is what is in one of the "offending" e-mails:-
JP>> Content-type: multipart/alternative;
JP>>  boundary="=_NextPart_000_0018_01C4BFFF.CA920770"

> When you don't see any charset=utf-8 then you should be able to pick
> the proper viewer in  Options -> Preferences -> Viewer/Editor



All three are set to plain text, the above e-mail did not display in plain
text.  Again this e-mail, in English, was from a Chinese sender.

-- 
John Phillips, Sydney, Australia

Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build  2600
Service Pack 2 

Basic programmers never die, they gosub and don't return

Winamp currently playing: 



Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: Bayesit

[MikeD (3)]

Hello Dan,

Tuesday, November 2, 2004, 8:46:34 AM, you wrote:

DG> Tue, 2 Nov 2004 13:31:10 +0200 (6:31 AM EST here) Dave Thomas wrote:

>> Where do I find the link to the latest [Bayesit] version

DG> You might want to try
DG> www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/bayesit/bayesit.lng .

I believe that is just the "language" file. The actual *plugin* file
name is "bayesit073.rar" so try this for that:

www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/bayesit/bayesit073.rar

-- 
Best regards,
 MikeDmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.1 on Windows ME 4.90 Build  3000
 



Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply Filtering

[Paul Jansen]

Dear All,

Is it possible to have a reply to an e-mail automatically filtered to
the same folder as the original message without having to set up a
filter for each folder?  I have quite a lot of folders!

Thanks

-- 
PJ

Using TB! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1



Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Mod: Top posting (was: Bayesit)

[Roelof Otten]

Hallo Dave,

On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 15:42:33 +0200GMT (2-11-2004, 14:42 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:

DT> Thanks Mike, yes hopefully someone will

DT> ==
MikeD>> Hello Dave,



Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have
instigated this reply. Please don't feel singled out Dave.

  )<)))'>

This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting.
And didn't contain a valid signature delimiter.

Top posting, i.e., typing all your reply text at the top of your
message and following it with all quoted text below, is not
encouraged and we actually request that you not do so on this list
because

a) It makes it difficult to glean context from what you typed at the
   top of the message

and

b) It encourages excessive quoting.

We would much prefer if you quote just that much of the message to
which you're replying, so we know what it is you're referring to,
and then below the quotation, type your response. If you're
responding to more than one part of the original, then quote each
part separately and follow each part with your response.

Now, I know that you may not personally prefer this format and that
you may disagree with some of the reasoning here. We very much
respect this. However, this is the format that most of the active
members here prefer and all members are expected, and are being
asked to use the format that will make most of the active membership
here comfortable reading. You'll likely get a more responsive group
when you post using a style that is comfortable for them to read and
understand.

To find out why these MOD messages are posted to the list instead of
private mail, please read the welcome message you received when you
subscribed.

Thank you.



-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

Ga Naar WINDOWS 95. Ga Niet Langs DOS. Ontvang Geen f 2,-

The Bat! 3.0.2.4 Rush
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
1 pop3 account, server on LAN



pgpt54bKbJVCr.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Bayesit

[Dan Grunberg]

Tue, 2 Nov 2004 13:31:10 +0200 (6:31 AM EST here) Dave Thomas wrote:

> Where do I find the link to the latest [Bayesit] version

You might want to try
www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/bayesit/bayesit.lng .



Using: The Bat! v2.12.00, BayesIt! 0.5.9,
   MyMacros 1.11, gMacrosPlugin 0.80
   Windows 2000 v5.0 - Build 2195 - Service Pack 4

-- 

Daniel A. Grunberg   Kensington, Maryland, USA
homepage: www.nyx.net/~dgrunber/



Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: Bayesit

[Dave Thomas]

Thanks Mike, yes hopefully someone will

==
MikeD> Hello Dave,

MikeD> Tuesday, November 2, 2004, 6:31:10 AM, you wrote:

DT>> Where do I find the link to the latest version

MikeD> Sorry, I no longer have that link handy and I cannot read the site
MikeD> well enough to find the link 

MikeD> Hopefully someone else will be able to post a copy of the link for
MikeD> you.





Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Big problem with filters NFS in V3 ! HELP !

[WilWilWil]

W> What's happen ? What can I do ? Help...

I asked Ritlabs support for help and I get it in less that 10 minutes.

Now it works.

The problem was .srx files to be deleted in my accounts folders. I deleted them and 
now all is OK !

I'm glad to have such quick and efficient answer from Ritlabs (Alexander Petrari).


-- 
WilWilWil 
:flag-france:


TB 3.0.1.33
BayesIt! 0.7.3
Windows XP
Service Pack 1

Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Bayesit

[MikeD (3)]

Hello Dave,

Tuesday, November 2, 2004, 6:31:10 AM, you wrote:

DT> Where do I find the link to the latest version

Sorry, I no longer have that link handy and I cannot read the site
well enough to find the link 

Hopefully someone else will be able to post a copy of the link for
you.

-- 
Best regards,
 MikeDmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.1 on Windows ME 4.90 Build  3000
 



Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: One filter in a group triggering

[MAU]

Hello Roelof,

> Try to create a filter with the 'continue processing' bit set. Set all
> of your colour group filters as subfilters of this parent filter. See
> if that does what you want.

I think it should work, but I haven't tried it myself.

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.4 Rush






Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Big problem with filters NFS in V3 ! HELP !

[WilWilWil]

Hello,

Yesterday I decided to improve my addresses management by using new filter system and 
addresses books.

I first create a common filter for all my 5 accounts that looks into "TO" "CC" and 
"BCC" fields of a new sent mail to add addresses in a group of my addresses book named 
"Personal White List".

This filter seems to work great.

So, I decided to work better, and make a group by account in addresses book. SO, I 
create these 5 groups, and create a new filter like the common one for each 5 account.

I first create filter for account 1 : 

OUTGOING MAIL of account 1
name : "my_filter_captureAdresses_for_account 1"
General : address book \does not contain  \all recipients
Actions : Add addresses from TO:, CC:, BCC:, to groups "Personnal White List Group for 
account 1"
Option : this filter is active



Then, I copied / Pasted this filter for each account and after, just changed the name, 
and the target addresses Book Group. For example, the 2nd filter for account 2 become :

OUTGOING MAIL of account 2
name : "my_filter_captureAdresses_for_account 2"
General : address book \does not contain  \all recipients
Actions : Add addresses from TO:, CC:, BCC:, to groups "Personnal White List Group for 
account 2"
Option : this filter is active


I quickly discovered than when I left and came back to TB, all changes done for 
adaptation of filter by account was lost. For my 5 accounts, TB has keep the same 
name, same rules and same addresses group targets. All rules stay the same as account 
1 !

Well, I decided to kill all the rules, left TB, launch again, and re create manually 
the filters and rules. And great, I see that changes are staying correct.

BUT NOW THE REAL PROBLEM IS: 

Now, those rules and filters work when I receive new mail !!! The addresses go to my 
addresses book!!! Yes, on Incoming email. But I 'm sure because I've just checked 
this, rules are set for OUTGOING Mails.

Big problem... Panic in my adresses book!  Hundreds of adding !

Because I'm tired with those filters problems, I kill all filters. But now I become 
crazy. The filters go on ! They are killed, I've left TB, reboot my computer, launch 
TB again but outgoing email rules carry on even they are killed.

What's happen ? What can I do ? Help...

Thanks


-- 
WilWilWil 
:flag-france:

TB 3.0.1.33
BayesIt! 0.7.3
Windows XP
Service Pack 1

Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: One filter in a group triggering

[Roelof Otten]

Hallo Ian,

On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 18:11:56 +1100GMT (2-11-2004, 8:11 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:

IAW> In some cases, the two filters can be triggered in succession because
IAW> both filters match the criteria. The filters set the same colour group
IAW> so that is not the problem, but I was wondering if it was possible to
IAW> have the first filter that matches trigger and pass on to the
IAW> remainder but not the rest of the "colour setting" filters?

Try to create a filter with the 'continue processing' bit set. Set all
of your colour group filters as subfilters of this parent filter. See
if that does what you want.
Of course I don't give any guarantees, the NFS is still new for me
too. ;-)

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

I was the kid next door's imaginary friend.

The Bat! 3.0.2.4 Rush
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
1 pop3 account, server on LAN



pgpWAbu2xeQkW.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: HTML displaying in V.3.01

[Roelof Otten]

Hallo John,

On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 16:16:52 +1100GMT (2-11-2004, 6:16 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:

>> Hit F9 and see whether you find something like this in the headers:
>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

JP> This is what is in one of the "offending" e-mails:-
JP> Content-type: multipart/alternative;
JP>  boundary="=_NextPart_000_0018_01C4BFFF.CA920770"

When you don't see any charset=utf-8 then you should be able to pick
the proper viewer in  Options -> Preferences -> Viewer/Editor

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

In spite of the cost of living, it's still popular.

The Bat! 3.0.2.4 Rush
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
1 pop3 account, server on LAN



pgp4VcBKPKYNX.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Version 3.x

[Roelof Otten]

Hallo z5worg,

On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 00:33:15 -0500GMT (1-11-2004, 6:33 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:

Z> 1.  How is v3 compare to v1.62 -- in terms of memory requirements and
Z> speed/performance.  Is v3 more bloated and slower?

As v3 has somewhat more features, it's bound to use more memory, but
I've never used v1 and v3 on the same computer with the same
message base, so I can't do an honest comparison.

Z> 2.  Will the backup/restore copy all configurations, accounts,
Z> filters, etc. from v1.x to 3.x?

There's no need to do any backup/restore during the upgrade. You
should be able to install v3 on top of v1 without any problems.

Some config files changed.
folder info:   account.flx -> account.flb
account info:  account.cfg -> account.cfn
filters:   account.srx -> account.srb

Those conversions are supposed to go automatically, but I advise to
check all of them. Note that the filters have been changed quite a
bit. Apart from some extra filtering conditions subfilters have been
introduced and so on.

The function of some macros has been slightly changed during the v1/v2
transition, so when you're using them extensively you'd better check
their output. As a bonus it's possible now to use recursive templates
and variables.

Z> 3.  Do the messages.tbb and messages.tbi have the same structure in
Z> v1.x and 3.x?

That's a tricky question. ;-)
When you compare 1.62 and V3, the answer is that they have the same
structure. But IIRC somewhere in the 1.4x/1.5x transition they
changed, so you might have been asking the wrong question. 

Z> i.e. can I copy the *.tbb and *.tbi from a computer with
Z> 1.x to another another computer with v3? Or do I have to use Backup
Z> and Restore?

I wouldn't use TB's backup/restore function at all, see the thread
with the subject "Auto Backup" that started yesterday in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anyhow, simply copy your complete mail directory to your new computer,
install TB and tell it to configure new accounts and to stay away from
backups. On installing a new account, TB will ask for the mail
directory, you point it to your copy and after that you enter the name
of the account, TB will recognize that name and will pick that
account. The necessary conversions should be performed automatically.

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

I can resist everything except temptation.

The Bat! 3.0.2.4 Rush
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
1 pop3 account, server on LAN



pgpURsyXOIBr2.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Bayesit

[Dave Thomas]

Where do I find the link to the latest version


--
Kind Regards

Dave Thomas
Product Manager
Psionet

Tel +27 21 683 1192
Fax +27 21 683 1196

Web: www.psion.co.za




Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: HTML displaying in V.3.01

[John Phillips]

Hi Thomas,
On Mon, 1 Nov 2004, at 20:24:48 [GMT+0700] (which was Tue, 0:24:48
Australian Eastern Time) you wrote:



> When TB receives a message in unicode (UTF-8 being the currently most
> popular version), the plain-text viewer is out of its league and TB
> will switch automatically to the richt-text viewer. This would look
> like you are seeing an "HTML version of a plain-text message", but
> it's not HTML.

> Hit F9 and see whether you find something like this in the headers:

>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8



This is what is in one of the "offending" e-mails:-

Content-type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="=_NextPart_000_0018_01C4BFFF.CA920770"

Is this causing the problem?

Anyway of getting these to display as plain text?

Thanks for the help!

-- 
John Phillips, Sydney, Australia

Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build  2600
Service Pack 2 

Windows is *NOT* a virus. Viruses *DO* something

Winamp currently playing: 



Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html