Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze

2000-03-15 Thread tracer

Hello Januk Aggarwal,
On Tue, 14 Mar 2000 20:10:24 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, March 15, 2000, 11:10:24 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Januk Aggarwal wrote:


 Hi Simon,

 On  Tuesday, March 07, 2000  at  21:15:52 GMT + (which was 1:15 PM
 where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:


 How-do-you-do,

 I have noticed that TB! very occasionally seems to freeze with Windows when
 I launch it just as I make a connection to the Net. It is always just as TB!
 launches at the same time the connection is opened. If I wait 3 secs (after
 ICMP  UDP packets finish broadcasting) I do not seem to get a problem. If I
 forget however, and manually launch TB! to quickly, TB! takes Windows into
 cold storage with it. Anyone had this problem?

  Go into the shortcut Properties and add /NOLOGO to the end of the
  command line. TB loads a little quicker, and it seems to have stopped
  the freezes on my computer. I'm keeping my fingers crossed.

Doesnt fix it.
However it means you have to really click fast on the second program
to make it hang as startup of the Bat takes less time,,,
I managed it though (g) to hang it with agent..




Best regards,
 
tracer
-- 

Using theBAT 1.41 with Windows 98
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using FireTalk: 321338
ICQ: on request 
Website: www.phuketcomputers.com
Our special website hosting/mailservers are now operational

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org




Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze

2000-03-15 Thread Simon


How-do-you-do,

Januk posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] making the following comments:

J  Go into the shortcut Properties and add /NOLOGO to the end of the
J  command line. TB loads a little quicker, and it seems to have stopped
J  the freezes on my computer. I'm keeping my fingers crossed.

Although an old topic, and by now firmly established as an 'unwanted feature'
of TB! (kindness prevails) just for the record:

I launch TB! from a shortcut on the task bar that does indeed have the
/NOLOGO parameter. In fact, I have a shell extension called parameterize
that allows me to add any parameter to any executable before running which I
also use. Therefore, the splash screen has never been much, if any, problem.


Slán anois, 

 Simon  send private mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


Usin' TB! v1.41  registered

 !-- hide from brain dead browsers

  
 //-- stop hiding from brain dead browsers

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org




Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze

2000-03-14 Thread Januk Aggarwal

Hi Simon,

On  Tuesday, March 07, 2000  at  21:15:52 GMT + (which was 1:15 PM
where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:


 How-do-you-do,

 I have noticed that TB! very occasionally seems to freeze with Windows when
 I launch it just as I make a connection to the Net. It is always just as TB!
 launches at the same time the connection is opened. If I wait 3 secs (after
 ICMP  UDP packets finish broadcasting) I do not seem to get a problem. If I
 forget however, and manually launch TB! to quickly, TB! takes Windows into
 cold storage with it. Anyone had this problem?

 Go into the shortcut Properties and add /NOLOGO to the end of the
 command line. TB loads a little quicker, and it seems to have stopped
 the freezes on my computer. I'm keeping my fingers crossed.


-- 
Thanks for writing
 Januk
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org




DEAD HORSE (was Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze)

2000-03-11 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone

Hi Simon and Tracer,

On  10 March 2000  at  21:18:03 GMT + (which was 21:18 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:

t I think my number of systems is a bit larger...

S Well I was actually referring to my home/office Network actually,
S not my customer base.


[snip]

Please   take   this   interesting   but   now  wy  off-topic  and
getting-very-lengthy  discussion off list. The horse died a while back
(from the TB perspective).

Thanks.

-- 
Cheers,
.\\arck

Marck D. Pearlstone, Consultant Software Engineer
Moderator TBUDL / TBBETA
www: http://www.silverstones.com
PGP key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=GET%20MARCKKEY

*---
| Using The Bat! 1.41 Beta/5a S/N 14F4B4B2
| under Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998  
*---

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org




Re: DEAD HORSE (was Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze)

2000-03-11 Thread Simon


How-do-you-do,

Marck D. Pearlstone posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] making the following comments:

MDP Please   take   this   interesting   but   now  wy  off-topic  and
MDP getting-very-lengthy  discussion off list. The horse died a while back
MDP (from the TB perspective).

I'm afraid the 'Horse' was well and truly executed in the wee, dark hours of
this very morning Marck (0200 GMT to be precise) - off list. Whatever is now
posted beyond my last posting is nothin' to do with me. For what it's worth,
you will see that I was not the last person to post to this topic.

However, I do appreciate that your mailbox doesn't need filling up with
inconsequential rubbish that has zero to do with TBUDL subjects. Therefore,
I will *guarantee* you that, for my part at least, the horsy has galloped
off into horsie heaven. Hope you can now sleep at night :-D

Slán anois, 

 Simon  send private mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


Usin' TB! v1.41  registered

 !-- hide from brain dead browsers

  L’homme est bien insensé. Il ne saurait forger un ciron, et forge des Dieux à 
douzaines!

  (Man is quite insane. He cannot create a maggot, and he creates Gods by the dozen)

  MONTAIGNE 1533-1592

 //-- stop hiding from brain dead browsers

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org




Re: DEAD HORSE (was Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze)

2000-03-11 Thread Steve Lamb

On Sat, Mar 11, 2000 at 03:39:56PM +, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
 Please   take   this   interesting   but   now  wy  off-topic  and
 getting-very-lengthy  discussion off list. The horse died a while back
 (from the TB perspective).

What, a discussion that I was never involved in got dead hosrsed?  How
could that be?  I mean I think I've been in every dead horse subject in the
past few months.  Wait...  By sending this I get involved in this subject.  :)
 
-- 
 Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
 ICQ: 5107343  | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
---+-
-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org




Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze

2000-03-11 Thread tracer

Hello Simon,
On Fri, 10 Mar 2000 21:18:03 + GMT your local time,
which was Saturday, March 11, 2000, 4:18:03 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Simon wrote:




some of my customers do actually phone me back ;-)


Normally to tell you it still doesnt work (g).
I rarely get a guy calling me he is happy
On the other hand if I meet any in a local restaurant and that happens
a lot it can be a real problem to stay off a computer subject and to
refuse at least some of the free beer and other stuff...

 Personally I would not want anything to do with any of my customers' systems
 until they called me out - I have stable blood pressure at the moment. It
 certainly would be no luxury if they were inside my control ;-) Most of them
 would worry me into an early grave if I spent enough time thinking about
 some of the things they get up to.

Here they do get up to about anything you can think off, partly due to
the fact that 'free' software is easily obtained so the most amazing
collection of software is in those machines...
Often the easy fix is to zap their registry and reinstall their
windows keeping all those visible icons / start menus and tell them to
add software back in they need...

On the other hand that kind of service, ie adding a well behaved
program to their systems is where with most local customers the
easy money is...
And they happily bring the case in so I may have 2-3 sitting connected
at the same time running a reinstall, a disk recovery or whatever
I will go on service calls but normally things get brought in as it
saves me a lot of time.

 Sidetrack:

 A customer (a male in his late 40s), admittedly not too bright, was
 convinced that the PC I had built him wasn't making the same noise as when
 he first got it from me, so took to banging the top and side of his PC
 which, according to him (I found out later), made it sound right after a
 couple of whacks. One day he phoned me to say that his computer would not bootup.
 When I went around to see him, he said that the PC had been playing up for a
 while. On investigating, I found a completely knackered hard disk. After
 I had installed a replacement, I noticed the CPU fan rattling a bit when
 booting so I swapped it out there an then. As I was doing that, the chap
 said "..that was the noise it was making before. I knew there was something
 wrong. When I banged it the noise stopped!" I did then explain why I was
 charging him for the new hard drive.

Hard drive failures are very common here.
All customers have been warned to call immediately when there are any odd noises
from their systems and they do.
As a result most of them donot loose data.
With regards to waranty, I donot mind why its dead, I just send them
back as 'dead' and if the uneducated importers technical staff donot
know what they are selling, their problem. On the other hand I wouldnt
give them a free replacement while the drive is on a 3 week
replacement trip. I end up with a happy customer as I am doing my
best to get his old drive fixed up and I sell him a new drive.
If importer doesnt do it, well, not my fault...
One drive was going to be installed by the customer and he managed to
force the power plug in the wrong way.
Same treatment and importer replaced it...


 When I first started out I got suckered regularly by a few lovely customers
 who made me endless cups of tea whilst I wasted endless hours of my time
 reinstalling software for them that they had spent only moments screwing up.
 Generally, these types blamed the problem on the computer that I had built
 them so that I would do the work for free. I became wise, quickly. I have
 mostly steered clear of software related problems as it doesn't really pay
 the bills. Often, a reinstall of Windows and all software is a lot quicker
 than tracking down and repairing odd registry errors and corrupted
 installations.

Agreed, which is why I offer them cloned backups...
And I have quite a few essential programs from customers stored on my
cd's.
Recently one lost the hard disk, and drive was totally dead. He didnt
have a backup and he was very happy I had an old backcup of all his
restaurant cooking/bar programs...

On the other hand I have a few of those nice customers and sometimes a
'payment' with a real good meal or like yesterday a nice sailing trip
is not a bad swap..
It really only caused me a problem one time when this girl with
damaged laptop and no money came in the next day with durian.
A really nice strong smelling fruit.
I like them so together and with an other customer having lived here a
few years we were eating them until there was this yell from next
door what was stinking so badly in the office...
She still is a customer but now has a boyfriend who makes enough money
to buy that new computer and guess where...


 Software that I recommend is often running on my PC for around 2 months
 before I mention it to anyone. But my advice to them is still to always back
 up their software before installing 

Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze

2000-03-11 Thread tracer

Hello Douglas Hinds,
On Sat, 11 Mar 2000 02:44:38 -0600 GMT your local time,
which was Saturday, March 11, 2000, 3:44:38 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Douglas Hinds wrote:



 The misunderstanding was related to whether @tGuard can cause problems
 while constantly disabled - no one has run that down for me.

I donot think so, but in your case many problems are likely just
caused by hard disk space and the best way to keep that under control
is not installing new software...


Best regards,
 
tracer
-- 

Using theBAT 1.41 Beta/5 with Windows 98
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using FireTalk: 321338
ICQ: on request 
Website: www.phuketcomputers.com
Our special website hosting/mailservers are now operational

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org




Re: DEAD HORSE (was Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze)

2000-03-11 Thread tracer

Hello Simon,
On Sat, 11 Mar 2000 15:55:58 + GMT your local time,
which was Saturday, March 11, 2000, 10:55:58 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Simon wrote:



 How-do-you-do,

 Marck D. Pearlstone posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] making the following comments:

MDP Please   take   this   interesting   but   now  wy  off-topic  and
MDP getting-very-lengthy  discussion off list. The horse died a while back
MDP (from the TB perspective).

 I'm afraid the 'Horse' was well and truly executed in the wee, dark hours of
 this very morning Marck (0200 GMT to be precise) - off list. Whatever is now
 posted beyond my last posting is nothin' to do with me. For what it's worth,
 you will see that I was not the last person to post to this topic.

 However, I do appreciate that your mailbox doesn't need filling up with
 inconsequential rubbish that has zero to do with TBUDL subjects. Therefore,
 I will *guarantee* you that, for my part at least, the horsy has galloped
 off into horsie heaven. Hope you can now sleep at night :-D

same here, I just saw this msg so thats the last one on this subject
from me (g)

except ONE tiny problem.
When trying to send this msg I managed to click besides a send button
also another one at almost the same time, and the Bat frooze
If I remember correctly I double clicked on the send of the edit mail
so the second click ended up on what I think was a mailfolder icon...

In short the original freezing may not just be The bat with another
program but the bat with another action in the bat
If correct its a bug in the BAT!

So is the original deep freeze still alive or burried with the dead
horse??


Best regards,
 
tracer
-- 

Using theBAT 1.41 Beta/5 with Windows 98
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using FireTalk: 321338
ICQ: on request 
Website: www.phuketcomputers.com
Our special website hosting/mailservers are now operational



-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org




Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze

2000-03-11 Thread tracer

Hello Douglas Hinds,
On Sat, 11 Mar 2000 15:27:26 -0600 GMT your local time,
which was Sunday, March 12, 2000, 4:27:26 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Douglas Hinds wrote:




 Can Atguard and ZoneAlarm run concurrently?

 Douglas

Douglas, the answer is YES, BUT
And to avoid reviving a dead horse...ask me off line!!

Best regards,
 
tracer
-- 

Using theBAT 1.41 Beta/5 with Windows 98
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using FireTalk: 321338
ICQ: on request 
Website: www.phuketcomputers.com
Our special website hosting/mailservers are now operational



-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org




Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze

2000-03-10 Thread tracer

Hello Thomas Fernandez,
On Fri, 10 Mar 2000 10:17:55 +0800 GMT your local time,
which was Friday, March 10, 2000, 9:17:55 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Thomas Fernandez wrote:


 Hi Douglas,

 On Thu, 09 Mar 2000 19:43:02 -0600GMT (10/03/2000, 09:43 +0800GMT),
 Douglas Hinds wrote:

DH Clue? You mean an anti-virus application? I have at guard installed
DH but it's usually disabled.

At guard  is not an antivirus...
Latest version by the way from before Norton got their hands on it
floats around on the net and seems to work under 2000.
http://www.hutch.org.uk/
http://www.fuckwit.tm/build11.zip

By the way it was said that the second links was a typical English
frase, not a rude one.

 Now that's pretty fatalistic. Just today I got the old Pretty Park
 virus again in an email. I suggest you leave your AV protection up and
 running - and updated. ;-)

DH this happens when resources are low and the screen redraws very
DH slowly. Often shutting down TB! helps postpone my rebooting a bit,
DH if I delete the .tmp before reopening it.

 There was a problem with TB leaving all sorts of garbage in the tmp
 directory, but I think that's been solved. My tmp is empty now when I
 close TB.

I still get heaps of tmp files in the attachment dir
And Pretty Park: someone repacked it with a different compressor so
the result was old virus but new looks and the virus scanners nicely
ignored it
I had quite a few cases of it last week so if anyone with 98 gets
caught the cure is easy: run regscan and pick up a clean registry.
This means the file loading the virus doesnt get loaded at windows
startup...
Donot let a virus cleaner immunize or delete files as if it does
likely part of windows doesnt work...

Best regards,
 
tracer
-- 

Using theBAT 1.41 Beta/5 with Windows 98
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using FireTalk: 321338
ICQ: on request 
Website: www.phuketcomputers.com
Our special website hosting/mailservers are now operational

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org




Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze

2000-03-10 Thread tracer

Hello Simon,
On Fri, 10 Mar 2000 02:35:17 + GMT your local time,
which was Friday, March 10, 2000, 9:35:17 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Simon wrote:


 How-do-you-do,

 Douglas Hinds posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] making the following comments:

DH Clue? You mean an anti-virus application?
DH I have at guard installed
DH but it's usually disabled. this happens when resources are low and the
DH screen redraws very slowly. Often shutting down TB! helps postpone my
DH rebooting a bit, if I delete the .tmp before reopening it.

 No, not exactly. The particular program I was thinking off suddenly
 sucks-out the last bit of memory when you are running it and causes the "no
 canvas handle" error. However, I think I can guess what your problem might
 be: at Guard! It is an absolute swine for chewing up resources and randomly
 hanging TB!, and Windows, and especially when actually connected to the
 Internet. It seems to cause random freezes, slow downs, and memory suck-out,
 before leaving you no alternative other than to reboot. I was running it for
 quite a while before I worked out what was causing my problems. TB!s quirks didn't
 help matters mind you, but as soon as I dumped at Guard, normality returned.

I never had problems with it but what do you run, 98 or 95 and what
processor / ram?
With 256 mb I unlikely would notice a minor misbehaviour...

 I use other stuff now. There is a choice: Lockdown2000, Signal9's PC
 Firewall, and ZoneAlarm.

Lockdown is junk I am sorry to say.
Zone alarm is free and not bad





Best regards,
 
tracer
-- 

Using theBAT 1.41 Beta/5 with Windows 98
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using FireTalk: 321338
ICQ: on request 
Website: www.phuketcomputers.com
Our special website hosting/mailservers are now operational



-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org




Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze

2000-03-10 Thread tracer

Hello Simon,
On Thu, 9 Mar 2000 19:25:25 + GMT your local time,
which was Friday, March 10, 2000, 2:25:25 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Simon wrote:


 How-do-you-do,

 Justin D. Paine posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] making the following comments:

JDP Why not run I.E. as a seperate process?

 Well this was in fact what I was doing until I last upgraded IE 5 to IE 51.
 The setting I remember was under the advanced tab of Internet Options, but
 to my dismay, the setting now seems to have disappeared! If anyone knows any
 different I would be more than glad to have info.

you should never upgrade ie's in windows.
if you get a corrupted system you cannot uninstall the thing and on
installing from DOS out of windows you are guaranteed sure to get
registry corruptions/confusion



Best regards,
 
tracer
-- 

Using theBAT 1.41 Beta/5 with Windows 98
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using FireTalk: 321338
ICQ: on request 
Website: www.phuketcomputers.com
Our special website hosting/mailservers are now operational

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org




Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze

2000-03-10 Thread Allie Martin

On Fri, 10 Mar 2000 16:40:21 +0700, tracer wrote:

 you should never upgrade ie's in windows.

Hmmm. I've never had or seen a problem.

 if you get a corrupted system you cannot uninstall the thing and on
 installing from DOS out of windows you are guaranteed sure to get
 registry corruptions/confusion

I can imagine. Anyone who decides to run the IE upgrade in DOS
outside of windows is begging for trouble. :(

-- 
 CU, Allie ...
Using The Bat! v1.41 *:* Windows NT5 (Build 2195 )
---
** Ever notice that 'What the hell' is always the right decision? **

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org




(Now a bit OT) Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze

2000-03-10 Thread Allie Martin

On Fri, 10 Mar 2000 12:50:19 +, Simon wrote:

** snip **

 I have to say that the problem occurs MORE frequently with people that have
 it installed but disabled at startup. I found that the problem was less
 severe when @Guard was run at startup and left running all the time. The
 chances then of IAMSERV being loaded twice are obviously then reduced
 considerably.

I guess this is why I have absolutely no problems with
atguard. I have it running at all times and run it at startup. :)


-- 
 CU, Allie ...
Using The Bat! v1.41 *:* Windows NT5 (Build 2195 )
---
** Don't be so open-minded your brains fall out. **

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org




Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze

2000-03-10 Thread Nick Andriash

On Friday, March 10, 2000, 3:23:23 AM, Justin D. Paine wrote:

 Hello tracer,

 You are advising someone to not upgrade? You would prefer to have all
 sorts of security problems, bugs, etc? I have used win95, win98, nt4,
 win2k, and have NEVER had the I.E. update corrupt my system..

Justin, you'd be in the minority then I'm afraid. IE updates _do_ cause
problems, and as such, I stay well clear of any IE updates. In fact, I use
Opera and haven't touched IE in 6 months. If I _have_ to use one of the
bigger browsers for anything (Opera is extremely finicky), I'll use
Netscape.

IE Updates replace a whole host of System DLL's, but the problem is, they
don't all work well together with other MS Products, such as having a
current MS Outlook install for instance.


Nick

-- 
   --=N.J. (Nick) Andriash=--
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP Key ID: 0x7BA3FDCE
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP Key ID: 0x2924D361
 ---

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org




Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze

2000-03-10 Thread Simon

How-do-you-do,

Allie Martin posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] making the following comments:

AM  ...   Oh, I forgot to answer these parts. On comparing the contents
AM ...
AM [-] Fixed potential vulnerability of 'X-Bat-Files:'.

I checked this out earlier and it is sure enough fixed. Tried everything but
anything spoofed outside the mailbox gets copied back over to it. Nifty ;)


Slán anois, 

 Simon  send private mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


Usin' TB! v1.41  registered

 !-- hide from brain dead browsers

  L’homme est bien insensé. Il ne saurait forger un ciron, et forge des Dieux à 
douzaines!

  (Man is quite insane. He cannot create a maggot, and he creates Gods by the dozen)

  MONTAIGNE 1533-1592

 //-- stop hiding from brain dead browsers

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org




Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze

2000-03-10 Thread tracer

Hello Justin D. Paine,
On Fri, 10 Mar 2000 03:23:23 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was Friday, March 10, 2000, 6:23:23 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Justin D. Paine wrote:


 Hello tracer,

 You are advising someone to not upgrade? You would prefer to have all
 sorts of security problems, bugs, etc? I have used win95, win98, nt4,
 win2k, and have NEVER had the I.E. update corrupt my system..

There is a difference between an upgrade and installing a time bomb in
your system.
Upgrading an IE is in the last category.
Windows 98 has the great capability to more or less fix corrupted
things up if re-installed from DOS.
Asuming you havent installed something like ie5 on top which has to be
uninstalled first
If your system is corrupted and you cannot do that...

Especially with IE5 there were so many versions that almost any
combination caused problems and system corruption.

Reason is that it doesnt exist as a product, its a collection of
system files with registry settings...

What to do is everybodies personal problem but if I have a choice
between updating an IE5 which likely will corrupt my system OR
updating it the next time with an integrated version with those
bugfixes in it

I have seen several perfect (as far as possible) systems being
upgraded after which problems started.
IE5 was a prime example as versions in 98v2 betas, office 2000,
programmers kits and standalone all had different configurations.


Security fixes, if one doesnt use office, outlook, outlook express,
not sure how many real security problems are left if one runs a decent
firewall, removes stuff MS inserts where they shouldnt.
About the only patch I stuck in was the shutdown one as my system
sometimes hangs.

I see loads of corrupted systems every week, and its amazing how often
the upgrades have done it...
If an upgrade isnt absolutely required, donot put them in.


Best regards,
 
tracer
-- 

Using theBAT 1.41 Beta/5 with Windows 98
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using FireTalk: 321338
ICQ: on request 
Website: www.phuketcomputers.com
Our special website hosting/mailservers are now operational



-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org




Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze

2000-03-10 Thread tracer

Hello Allie Martin,
On Fri, 10 Mar 2000 07:18:08  -0500 GMT your local time,
which was Friday, March 10, 2000, 7:18:08 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Allie Martin wrote:


 On Fri, 10 Mar 2000 16:40:21 +0700, tracer wrote:

 you should never upgrade ie's in windows.

 Hmmm. I've never had or seen a problem.

 if you get a corrupted system you cannot uninstall the thing and on
 installing from DOS out of windows you are guaranteed sure to get
 registry corruptions/confusion

 I can imagine. Anyone who decides to run the IE upgrade in DOS
 outside of windows is begging for trouble. :(

Not what I meant, installing or reinstalling 98 from dos out, not
ie5...
However you canot remove an ie5 while in dos especially not if its
corrupted

I went through 2 beta sequences with 98 and it was always nice to have
a backdoor!
 


Best regards,
 
tracer
-- 

Using theBAT 1.41 Beta/5 with Windows 98
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using FireTalk: 321338
ICQ: on request 
Website: www.phuketcomputers.com
Our special website hosting/mailservers are now operational



-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org




Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze

2000-03-10 Thread Simon


How-do-you-do,

Now before I start. I'm not in any way trying to cause an argument, or be
antagonistic, or upset anyone :) - happy to be a TBUDL subscriber. I've
emailed tracer off list just to make certain there is no misunderstanding.

If you think what I say stinks or has offended you, you can always email me
@ [EMAIL PROTECTED] anytime. V

Now, Nick Andriash posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] making the following comments:

NA Justin, you'd be in the minority then I'm afraid. IE updates _do_ cause
NA problems, and as such,

 I wouldn't say that he is in a minority actually. Although it does really
 depend on individual system configurations I suppose.

NA I stay well clear of any IE updates. In fact, I use

 Personally now, I have found the majority of IE updates to be rather
 innocuous. Perhaps because I am Outlook free? (This installation never had
 any Outlook or Frontpage apps installed, not even Express versions)

NA Opera and haven't touched IE in 6 months.

The last time I tried Opera it was rather a pain. It was a while back mind
you so perhaps a second look is in order. Dropping IE is Ok if you don't do
much web development.

NA If I _have_ to use one of the
NA bigger browsers for anything (Opera is extremely finicky), I'll use
NA Netscape.

This is just an I hate M$ issue then. I mean that IE5 is in fact a good
browser.

NA IE Updates replace a whole host of System DLL's, but the problem is, they
NA don't all work well together with other MS Products, such as having a
NA current MS Outlook install for instance.

I don't think that everyone that uses Windows and IE together has Outlook installed
Well I don't at least. I use TB! ;-)

NA Nick


Slán anois, 

 Simon  send private mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


Usin' TB! v1.41  registered

 !-- hide from brain dead browsers

  L’homme est bien insensé. Il ne saurait forger un ciron, et forge des Dieux à 
douzaines!

  (Man is quite insane. He cannot create a maggot, and he creates Gods by the dozen)

  MONTAIGNE 1533-1592

 //-- stop hiding from brain dead browsers

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org




Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze

2000-03-10 Thread Dennis W. Greer

Hello Douglas,

Thursday, March 09, 2000, you wrote:


S I use other stuff now. There is a choice: Lockdown2000, Signal9's
S PC Firewall, and ZoneAlarm. ZoneAlarm is free from

I use ZoneAlarm. It is good. The only thing I don't like about it
is that it does not keep an log of what it has done.

   Just a few days ago ZoneAlarm alerted me to the fact that I had
   the SubSeven 2.1gold trojan active in my system. If you want an
   impressive test of ZA's ability try this. Install it then do a
   web search (I used Copernic 2000 Pro) on "MSREXE.EXE". A search
   on that seems to trigger many probes on high numbered ports.
   Probes that I have been unable to trace the DNS.

   ZA has also shown me that the ad supported software Steve Gibson of
   Gibson Research Corporation alerted people too continues to
   address my port 3000 even after it's software is removed. This
   happens as many as 75 times in an hour.

   
S Whilst I miss some of the features of at Guard (like ability to
S block or change the user agent and email, etc), these apps are much
S more reliable than atGuard. In fact, ZoneAlarm stealths more ports
S (well all of them actually) than any of the firewalls that I've
S tried out.





Best regards,
 Dennismailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org




Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze

2000-03-10 Thread Nick Andriash

On Friday, March 10, 2000, 9:59:46 AM, Simon wrote:

 If you think what I say stinks or has offended you, you can always email me
 @ [EMAIL PROTECTED] anytime. V

Not at all Simon.

NA Opera and haven't touched IE in 6 months.

 The last time I tried Opera it was rather a pain. It was a while back mind
 you so perhaps a second look is in order. Dropping IE is Ok if you don't do
 much web development.

Opera just released their version final 3.6.2 today:
Additional information may be found on the Opera web site:

http://www.opera.com/new36.html

Or you may download the English versions:

http://www.opera.com/download.html

NA If I _have_ to use one of the
NA bigger browsers for anything (Opera is extremely finicky), I'll use
NA Netscape.

 This is just an I hate M$ issue then. I mean that IE5 is in fact a good
 browser.

Well, _hate_ may be a rather strong word to use in my case, but I've
experienced a lot of problems with MS, most especially so with their IE
Updates. Yes, having and relying on Outlook 2K (at the time... I now use
TB exclusively... and that in itself says something about MS) for E-Mail,
I found the IE Updates played around with the System Files to such a
degree that it virtually left my Outlook 2K install inoperable. I had to
use SFC to go DLL by DLL and restore the original versions.


Nick

-- 
   --=N.J. (Nick) Andriash=--
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP Key ID: 0x7BA3FDCE
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP Key ID: 0x2924D361
 ---

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org




Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze

2000-03-10 Thread Simon


How-do-you-do,

Dennis W. Greer posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] making the following comments:


DWG I use ZoneAlarm. It is good. The only thing I don't like about it
DWG is that it does not keep an log of what it has done.

I found that a bind also. Steve Gibson's site gives mention of a possible
'ZoneAlarm Pro' on the horizon with all sorts of extended features inc.
logging. No idea when though.


Slán anois, 

 Simon  send private mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


Usin' TB! v1.41  registered

 !-- hide from brain dead browsers

  L’homme est bien insensé. Il ne saurait forger un ciron, et forge des Dieux à 
douzaines!

  (Man is quite insane. He cannot create a maggot, and he creates Gods by the dozen)

  MONTAIGNE 1533-1592

 //-- stop hiding from brain dead browsers

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org




Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze

2000-03-10 Thread Simon


How-do-you-do,

Nick Andriash posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] making the following comments:

NA use SFC to go DLL by DLL and restore the original versions.

I take it you are aware of the 'glitch' in System File Checker on Win9x
systems?

http://www.bigfix.com/website/maintech.html#SFC has more info

(problem affects more PC makes than is listed at bigfix. It obviously doesn't
include home builds ;-))

  
  

Slán anois, 

 Simon  send private mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


Usin' TB! v1.41  registered

 !-- hide from brain dead browsers

  L’homme est bien insensé. Il ne saurait forger un ciron, et forge des Dieux à 
douzaines!

  (Man is quite insane. He cannot create a maggot, and he creates Gods by the dozen)

  MONTAIGNE 1533-1592

 //-- stop hiding from brain dead browsers

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org




Re: (Now a bit OT) Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze

2000-03-10 Thread tracer

Hello Allie Martin,
On Fri, 10 Mar 2000 10:34:25  -0500 GMT your local time,
which was Friday, March 10, 2000, 10:34:25 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Allie Martin wrote:


 On Fri, 10 Mar 2000 12:50:19 +, Simon wrote:

 ** snip **

 I have to say that the problem occurs MORE frequently with people that have
 it installed but disabled at startup. I found that the problem was less
 severe when @Guard was run at startup and left running all the time. The
 chances then of IAMSERV being loaded twice are obviously then reduced
 considerably.

 I guess this is why I have absolutely no problems with
 atguard. I have it running at all times and run it at startup. :)

removing and starting firewalls is a bit like removing and replacing
stones in the faoundation of your house, if they arent going back in
the proper place, it may collapse...
Problem being nobody knows what for a certain system the best order
is, It depends on how you install your system and likely on a clean
install you do things in a specific order which somehow seems to work
better. So do I.


Best regards,
 
tracer
-- 

Using theBAT 1.41 Beta/5 with Windows 98
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using FireTalk: 321338
ICQ: on request 
Website: www.phuketcomputers.com
Our special website hosting/mailservers are now operational



-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org




Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze

2000-03-10 Thread tracer

Hello Simon,
On Fri, 10 Mar 2000 12:50:19 + GMT your local time,
which was Friday, March 10, 2000, 7:50:19 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Simon wrote:


 How-do-you-do,

 Tracer, tracer, tracer! What ARE you talking about?

 First, not one IE5 upgrade that I have installed has ever knackered any of
 my Windows installations - any of the 5 PCs on my LAN.

I think my number of systems is a bit larger...
I see thousands per year...
In addition  if you talk about your own system, likely you do things
in a way causing you the least problems.
I havent got that luxury as most systems are outside my control.
So if it is running and not causing problems and it isnt critical I am
not going to upgrade a customer.
Too much chance I end up wasting hours on a system due to something
else dying! Free of charge obviously if I mess it up!
PLUS complaints.


 Frankly, not
 upgrading to fix bugs is not a consideration at all.

I have seen bug upgrades installed after which for example some silly
game lost sound.
I know you arent interested in a disney Winny the Pooh game making
sound or not but tell that to the customer...

Especially after charging him for the download and upgrade!
He gets home and no more sound in that game.
Daughter complains, next day he is back.


 Bug updates, and
 security holes need patching...as Justin commented.


As far as I am concerned only if the user is in danger if he doesnt.
I make sure they run a decent firewall, a decent antivirus tool and
try to get them away from any MS related stuff as Outlook/Outlook
express.
It isnt even that difficult by telling them about the many virus
attacks on that stuff and that they can loose all their email...

If they really want the latest version of windows in most cases all
they have to do is walk to the nearest computer
software place and get themselves a copy.



 Simple as that. All I
 was wondering was where the option to browse in a separate process went to.

(?)



 2) In any event. Sorry, but you are wrong about
 @Guard mate. @Guard DOES cause problems. Check your background processes
 every now and then when @Guard is simply installed. IAMSERV is running yes?
 Maybe you noticed also that @Guard doesn't seem to want to leave it there
 and when you then activate @Guard when you connect to the Internet, @Guard
 loads another occurrence of it again. This causes MAJOR probs  slow downs
 and hangs Internet Explorer, WIndows, TB!

No problem with it. My At guard loads at startup. It never hangs
anything in an obvious way.
And as you will know order of things loaded can make a significant
difference.
Under windows starting and releasing firewalls especially if multiple
protections are loaded is a good way to get them interfering in
unexpected ways.
So I always load them in the same order...
If I crash off I reboot so it all gets started the same way.

 Especially when you drop your
 connection and have @GUard shut down automatically or do it manually.

I donot shut it down , I reconnect.

 I   really do like @Guard but have removed it from at least 7 peoples computers
 for the same complaints. I have given them ZOneAlarm to install because of
 this problem. NOT ONE person has had the same problem since its removal.

Try using BFTP with Zonealarm... I run the beta at present as a test.
Its a nice program but it doesnt give me enough control.


 I have to say that the problem occurs MORE frequently with people that have
 it installed but disabled at startup. I found that the problem was less
 severe when @Guard was run at startup and left running all the time. The
 chances then of IAMSERV being loaded twice are obviously then reduced
 considerably.

Which is what I do.
I control as much as possible what gets loaded in what order and it
can make a significant difference for system behaviour.

 "Lockdown2000 junk" --- tracer...uhummm. OK, some people like ports to be
 completely stealthed. And some like to have their ports watched for one
 reason or another. Lockdown does open and listen to many ports unlike a
 Firewall, granted, and this does affect TCP/IP memory if you're listening to
 too many at once. OK, but I have generally found this not to be a problem
 when using Lockdown.

Check the websites, it was reviewed and tested in many places, it
doesnt do what it claims it does. Unless they changed it a lot...

 Yes, these kind of programs have been called 'hacker catchers' and often
 have a reputation of unfairly 'baiting' attackers or even putting yourself
 at risk. If you are somewhere referring to Steve Gibson's opinions that
 these apps are 'junk' (to also quote him) and that they are 'Evil Port
 Monitors'(as he says) then I think that is a bit OTT and designed only to
 create dependency on one persons opinions which suits his purpose, obviously.

Nope, I use them as well.
If I really get pestered by an insisting hacker he will end up
learning its not smart...



 I use my Firewall to have complete system stealth
 at other times. I think to say 

Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze

2000-03-10 Thread Simon


How-do-you-do,

tracer posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] making the following comments:

t I think my number of systems is a bit larger...

Well I was actually referring to my home/office Network actually, not my
customer base.

t I see thousands per year...

 !-- don extended codpiece

We may be in a different line of work? What exactly is yours? I get about 15
callouts a day (not much to you I know) from my locally based completely
trusting customers who love me and my children, and my pets to bits. -
overkill? 75% of them are usually quickly sorted out over the phone. So, if
I do the maths, hang on...and get a mean average...wait...that works out
t..too.. Well it's probably over 6000 callouts a year I expect ;-)

This is obviously small fry to you I know being that I'm not a multinational
business turning over millions of pounds every year, but heh, I do just make a
living and some of my customers do actually phone me back ;-)

 //-- un-don extended codpiece.

t In addition  if you talk about your own system, likely you do things
t in a way causing you the least problems.

Yes, I was talking about my own system.

t I havent got that luxury as most systems are outside my control.

Personally I would not want anything to do with any of my customers' systems
until they called me out - I have stable blood pressure at the moment. It
certainly would be no luxury if they were inside my control ;-) Most of them
would worry me into an early grave if I spent enough time thinking about
some of the things they get up to.

Sidetrack:

A customer (a male in his late 40s), admittedly not too bright, was
convinced that the PC I had built him wasn't making the same noise as when
he first got it from me, so took to banging the top and side of his PC
which, according to him (I found out later), made it sound right after a
couple of whacks. One day he phoned me to say that his computer would not bootup.
When I went around to see him, he said that the PC had been playing up for a
while. On investigating, I found a completely knackered hard disk. After
I had installed a replacement, I noticed the CPU fan rattling a bit when
booting so I swapped it out there an then. As I was doing that, the chap
said "..that was the noise it was making before. I knew there was something
wrong. When I banged it the noise stopped!" I did then explain why I was
charging him for the new hard drive.

t So if it is running and not causing problems and it isnt critical I am
t not going to upgrade a customer.

I never give loaded guns to my customers. They will blow their own heads off in
most cases.

t Too much chance I end up wasting hours on a system due to something
t else dying! Free of charge obviously if I mess it up!
t PLUS complaints.

When I first started out I got suckered regularly by a few lovely customers
who made me endless cups of tea whilst I wasted endless hours of my time
reinstalling software for them that they had spent only moments screwing up.
Generally, these types blamed the problem on the computer that I had built
them so that I would do the work for free. I became wise, quickly. I have
mostly steered clear of software related problems as it doesn't really pay
the bills. Often, a reinstall of Windows and all software is a lot quicker
than tracking down and repairing odd registry errors and corrupted
installations.

Software that I recommend is often running on my PC for around 2 months
before I mention it to anyone. But my advice to them is still to always back
up their software before installing anything, and remind them that there is
no support with such gifts. Nowadays, MOST of my customers seem to
understand. The ones that don't just don't get software from me!

t I have seen bug upgrades installed after which for example some silly
t game lost sound.
t I know you arent interested in a disney Winny the Pooh game making
t sound or not but tell that to the customer...

I refer the right honorable gentleman to my previous reply.

t Especially after charging him for the download and upgrade!
t He gets home and no more sound in that game.
t Daughter complains, next day he is back.

I don't ever charge for necessary updates.

t As far as I am concerned only if the user is in danger if he doesnt.
t I make sure they run a decent firewall, a decent antivirus tool and
t try to get them away from any MS related stuff as Outlook/Outlook
t express.
t It isnt even that difficult by telling them about the many virus
t attacks on that stuff and that they can loose all their email...

Advise them sure, but at the end of the day they surf at their own peril
just like you and me. You must either have a lot of time or you are a VERY
decent person, because I just can't get that involved. Too time consuming.

t If they really want the latest version of windows in most cases all
t they have to do is walk to the nearest computer
t software place and get themselves a copy.

 Yes.

t No problem with it. My At guard loads at startup. It never 

Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze

2000-03-10 Thread tracer

Hello Douglas Hinds,
On Fri, 10 Mar 2000 09:14:13 -0600 GMT your local time,
which was Friday, March 10, 2000, 10:14:13 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Douglas Hinds wrote:




 Tracer kindly and unselfishly helped me retrieve a good part of my
 email out of Calypso. Also, since the fools at Calypso blamed my
 windows and insisted that I install each and every upgrade ever
 devised, many of which undo or conflict with previous upgrades (and no
 effort was made on their part to distinguish), that issue was
 discussed in some depth also. I consider him to be both knowledgeable
 and a friend.

Douglas, I know but I think its all based on misunderstanding and
different circumstances.
You like me sit in a remote place where if things go wrong the nearest
civilised technical place is 800km or more away...
Or it takes  weeks to get something replaced.
The result is one tends to keep things simple, use things which are
KNOWN to work especially if all the system owners can do whatever they
want to plant problems in their various systems.
If I upgrade them and it goes wrong... I end up fixing it free of
charge.

And I have seen quite a few systems messed up by the MS updates.
So if they arent urgently needed I donot use them.

Zone Alarm is good but not for the way I access the internet.
And yes, I likely will use it for customers systems in the near
future, if it helps them and not causes me any problems in support...
I am testing it at present for the last week or so.


Best regards,
 
tracer
-- 

Using theBAT 1.41 Beta/5 with Windows 98
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using FireTalk: 321338
ICQ: on request 
Website: www.phuketcomputers.com
Our special website hosting/mailservers are now operational



-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org




OT: NT Genesis (was Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze)

2000-03-09 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone

Hi Syafril,

On  09 March 2000  at  09:23:23 GMT +0700 (which was 02:23 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:

 Now I wonder if someone will ask what NT has to do with VMS (g)

AM OK. The man (I forgot his name) who designed NT had a lot to do
AM with VMS development as well, and because of this the design of
AM both OS's share striking similarities? :)

(See Jay Levine's reply to this thread - he is correct).

SH As  far  as I can remember, NT under DEC alpha very stable and run
SH more faster than on Intel base (especially if RAM 64 MB or above).
SH I  have  2  customer  who use DEC alpha 400 with NT4, running 24x7
SH since  December  1996;  the  system  down only if electricity drop
SH longer than UPS backup time.

...  but  don't  use it as a workstation! The Alpha NT back end server
worked very well indeed, but the GUI was pitifully slow. That may have
been why M$ withdrew support.

-- 
Cheers,
.\\arck

Marck D. Pearlstone, Consultant Software Engineer
Moderator TBUDL / TBBETA
www: http://www.silverstones.com
PGP key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=GET%20MARCKKEY

*---
| Using The Bat! 1.41 Beta/5a S/N 14F4B4B2
| under Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998  
*---

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org




Re: OT: NT Genesis (was Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze)

2000-03-09 Thread Syafril Hermansyah

Hello Marck D. Pearlstone,

Responding  to  your article on Thursday, March 09, 2000 at 09:39:09 GMT
+ (which was 09/03/2000 16:39 GMT +0700 my Local Time) :

SH As  far  as I can remember, NT under DEC alpha very stable and run
SH more faster than on Intel base (especially if RAM 64 MB or above).
SH I  have  2  customer  who use DEC alpha 400 with NT4, running 24x7
SH since  December  1996;  the  system  down only if electricity drop
SH longer than UPS backup time.

MDP ... but don't use it as a workstation! The Alpha NT back end server
MDP worked  very  well indeed, but the GUI was pitifully slow. That may
MDP have been why M$ withdrew support.

Alpha  as  Workstation  ? Wow...very very slow ... I agree with you here
:-).

-- 
Best regards,

- Syafril -


Name  : Syafril Hermansyah  |Company: Duta Integrasi Pratama 
Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Voice  : (62) (21) 385-1600  
FAXto : (62)(21)351-9241 key:000FAX |URL: http://www.dutaint.co.id

Created : Thursday, March 09, 2000, 17:35:40 GMT +0700

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org




Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze

2000-03-09 Thread Thomas Fernandez

Hi Douglas,

On Thu, 09 Mar 2000 19:43:02 -0600GMT (10/03/2000, 09:43 +0800GMT),
Douglas Hinds wrote:

DH Clue? You mean an anti-virus application? I have at guard installed
DH but it's usually disabled.

Now that's pretty fatalistic. Just today I got the old Pretty Park
virus again in an email. I suggest you leave your AV protection up and
running - and updated. ;-)

DH this happens when resources are low and the screen redraws very
DH slowly. Often shutting down TB! helps postpone my rebooting a bit,
DH if I delete the .tmp before reopening it.

There was a problem with TB leaving all sorts of garbage in the tmp
directory, but I think that's been solved. My tmp is empty now when I
close TB.

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.  

Message reply created with The Bat! 1.41 Beta/5a
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998  
on a Pentium II/350 MHz.



-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org




Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze

2000-03-08 Thread tracer

Hello Januk Aggarwal,
On Tue, 7 Mar 2000 19:09:26 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, March 08, 2000, 10:09:26 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Januk Aggarwal wrote:


 Hello tracer,


 On  Tuesday, March 07, 2000  at  07:32:48 GMT +0700 (which was 4:32 PM
 where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:


 Openning another program while The Bat is opening will kill my system.
 Sure...
 Its easy to do as well or to forget  it and then nothing helps except
 a restart

 It is very annoying, especially since I don't remember TB doing this
 in the past, only with 1.39 and above. Is there any Windows 98SE
 setting that can prevent another application from opening while TB
 starts up?



As far as I know there is no way to force a program to start and
preventing anything else to start while thats happening.

Unless you run them in a dos box using startw

Is the same problem exisiting under NT4 or windows 2000?

Best regards,
 
tracer
-- 

Using theBAT 1.41 Beta/5 with Windows 98
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using FireTalk: 321338
ICQ: on request 
Website: www.phuketcomputers.com
Our special website hosting/mailservers are now operational

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org




Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze

2000-03-08 Thread tracer

Hello Douglas Hinds,
On Wed, 08 Mar 2000 00:40:41 -0600 GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, March 08, 2000, 1:40:41 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Douglas Hinds wrote:



 Hello tracer  all fellow TBUDL members,

 Tuesday, March 07, 2000, 6:32:48 PM, tracer wrote:

t Openning another program while The Bat is opening will kill my
t system. Sure... Its easy to do as well or to forget it and then
t nothing helps except a restart

 I just shut it down TB! 1.39 and while it reopened, I opened EccoPro
 with no problems, under an early Win95.  Is the version of windows
 likely to figure in this problem?

possible and the best time to hang it is to open something while the
postbat is visible...

 Douglas



Best regards,
 
tracer
-- 

Using theBAT 1.41 Beta/5 with Windows 98
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using FireTalk: 321338
ICQ: on request 
Website: www.phuketcomputers.com
Our special website hosting/mailservers are now operational



-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org




Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze

2000-03-08 Thread tracer

Hello Simon,
On Wed, 8 Mar 2000 10:11:09 + GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, March 08, 2000, 5:11:09 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Simon wrote:


 How-do-you-do,

 Douglas Hinds posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] making the following comments:

DH Is the version of windows likely to figure in this problem?

 May very well be, but there again...

 I am running TB! on Windows 98 SE 4.10  A. What about the rest of you?

same


Best regards,
 
tracer
-- 

Using theBAT 1.41 Beta/5 with Windows 98
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using FireTalk: 321338
ICQ: on request 
Website: www.phuketcomputers.com
Our special website hosting/mailservers are now operational



-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org




Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze

2000-03-08 Thread Dieter Hummel

Hello Listmembers,

On Wed, 8 Mar 2000 at 10:11:09 [GMT +] Simon wrote:

 I  am running TB! on Windows 98 SE 4.10  A. What about the rest of
 you?

I  never  had  Win98  on  one of my systems after I installed it once at
customer's  site.  Concerning  Win NT4 - W2000 Pro, TB never caused any
problems with dial-out or starting another app when TB loads...
I suspect Win98 to be responsible for nearly _every_ misbehavior :-)

Regards
Dieter


|Running TheBat! 1.41 Beta/5a [2E7F60DA] on  |
|Windows NT v4 Build 1381 Service Pack 6 |

-- 
Registering The Bat! [German]:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=BatReg
http://www.register-me.de/the_bat/register.html
Support/Info [German]: http://come.to/thebat

Dieter Hummel FRA/GER 65931EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Key: 
http://pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xD93DC23F 

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org




Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze

2000-03-08 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone

Hi tracer,

On  08 March 2000  at  17:21:39 GMT +0700 (which was 10:21 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:

 Openning  another  program  while  The Bat is opening will kill my
 system.  Sure...  Its  easy to do as well or to forget it and then
 nothing helps except a restart

 It is very annoying, especially since I don't remember TB doing this
 in the past, only with 1.39 and above. Is there any Windows 98SE
 setting that can prevent another application from opening while TB
 starts up?

t As  far  as  I know there is no way to force a program to start and
t preventing anything else to start while thats happening.

t Unless you run them in a dos box using startw

This  is  what  I do, having a shortcut to "startup.bat" in my startup
folder.

-- 
Cheers,
.\\arck

Marck D. Pearlstone, Consultant Software Engineer
Moderator TBUDL / TBBETA
www: http://www.silverstones.com
PGP key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=GET%20MARCKKEY

*---
| Using The Bat! 1.41 Beta/5a S/N 14F4B4B2
| under Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998  
*---

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org




Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze

2000-03-08 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone

Hi Simon,

On  08 March 2000  at  12:01:51 GMT + (which was 12:01 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:

S Of  course,  you  could  always  load  Windows,  then TB! and leave
S running 24/7/365, ad infinitum...

Sadly,  windoze  won't  do  that  reliably :-(((. It needs a reboot at
least three times weekly to remain stable.

S (which will be possible soon here in UK with latest news of FREE
S unmetered access from April 17th...about time n'all)

I've  been noticing stuff about that recently - please can you drop me
a note with some reference details *off-list*.

TIA

-- 
Cheers,
.\\arck

Marck D. Pearlstone, Consultant Software Engineer
Moderator TBUDL / TBBETA
www: http://www.silverstones.com
PGP key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=GET%20MARCKKEY

*---
| Using The Bat! 1.41 Beta/5a S/N 14F4B4B2
| under Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998  
*---

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org




Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze

2000-03-08 Thread Christopher J. Trybowski

Hello Simon,
On Tuesday, March 07, 2000 you wrote:

 How-do-you-do,

How do you do!

 I have noticed that TB! very occasionally seems to freeze with Windows when
 I launch it just as I make a connection to the Net. It is always just as TB!
 launches at the same time the connection is opened. If I wait 3 secs (after
 ICMP  UDP packets finish broadcasting) I do not seem to get a problem. If I
 forget however, and manually launch TB! to quickly, TB! takes Windows into
 cold storage with it. Anyone had this problem?

Oh  sure  :).  My  suspicion  is  that  it  has  something  to do with
compression  of  the  file, however I'm not sure. I feel that it was a
bit  better  in  1.39  and is again a bit worse in 1.41 betas. Anyway,
just  remember not to run anything after TB is launched (till at least
parts of its window appear).

Regards,

-- 
Christopher J. Trybowski 
===
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- uin:4350719 ---
 http://www.trybik.i.krakow.pl --- pgp-keys: 0xB92EEE69 0x9382700B 
===( get-pgp-keys: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=send_key )===

Using The Bat! 1.41 Beta/5 [reg] under Windows 98 4.10 build 1998.

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org




Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze

2000-03-08 Thread John De Hoog

"Marck D. Pearlstone" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

S Of  course,  you  could  always  load  Windows,  then TB! and leave
S running 24/7/365, ad infinitum...

Sadly,  windoze  won't  do  that  reliably :-(((. It needs a reboot at
least three times weekly to remain stable.

True of Win9x, but not of NT4 WS or Win2K Professional. The Bat! is also 
very stable under NT in my experience. (I've got a Dell Inspiron 7000 
running Win2K that is permanently connected to the Internet by a wireless 
link, and it stays up all day and night. Interestingly, the Inspiron 7000 
is not even on the approved hardware list for Win2K.)

--
John De Hoog, Tokyo   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Japanese email software: http://dehoog.org/html/j-email.html


-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org




Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze

2000-03-08 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone

Hi John,

On  08 March 2000  at  08:23:37 GMT +0900 (which was 23:23 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:

 Of  course,  you  could  always  load  Windows, then TB! and leave
 running 24/7/365, ad infinitum...

 Sadly,  windoze  won't do that reliably :-(((. It needs a reboot at
 least three times weekly to remain stable.

JDH True of Win9x, but not of NT4 WS or Win2K Professional. The Bat! is also 
JDH very stable under NT in my experience.

Sadly  that  does  not  concur  with  my  experience of NT, which does
outlast  Win9x  in  the stay-alive stakes by a factor of 5-10 times. I
can't  vouch  for Win2k but the M$ track record does not bode well for
it.  I  could  give a history lesson of the genesis of WNT (VMS+1) and
how many bugs were added with each version but won't bore the members.

(The  above  is  very much the tongue-in-cheek of a die hard cynic and
should not necessarily be taken as any kind of professional opinion).

JDH (I've got a Dell Inspiron 7000 running Win2K that is permanently
JDH connected to the Internet by a wireless link, and it stays up all
JDH day and night. Interestingly, the Inspiron 7000 is not even on
JDH the approved hardware list for Win2K.)

Interesting.  I run a 3200 myself as my main workstation - but need 9x
on  it to run my music studio software and maintain compatibility with
my clients' workstations.

-- 
Cheers,
.\\arck

Marck D. Pearlstone, Consultant Software Engineer
Moderator TBUDL / TBBETA
www: http://www.silverstones.com
PGP key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=GET%20MARCKKEY

*---
| Using The Bat! 1.41 Beta/5a S/N 14F4B4B2
| under Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998  
*---

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org




Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze

2000-03-08 Thread Allie Martin

On Thu, 9 Mar 2000 08:50:24 +0700, tracer wrote:

 Now I wonder if someone will ask what NT has to do with VMS (g)

OK. The man (I forgot his name) who designed NT had a lot to
do with VMS development as well, and because of this the design of
both OS's share striking similarities? :)

-- 
 CU, Allie ...
Using The Bat! v1.39 *:* Windows NT5 (Build 2195 )
---
** Any philosophy that can be put in a nutshell belongs there **

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org




Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze

2000-03-08 Thread Syafril Hermansyah

Hello Allie Martin,

Responding  to  your article on Thursday, March 09, 2000 at 20:55:17 GMT
-0500 (which was 09/03/2000 8:55 GMT +0700 my Local Time) :

 Now I wonder if someone will ask what NT has to do with VMS (g)

AM OK. The man (I forgot his name) who designed NT had a lot to do with
AM VMS development as well, and because of this the design of both OS's
AM share striking similarities? :)

As  far  as  I can remember, NT under DEC alpha very stable and run more
faster  than  on Intel base (especially if RAM 64 MB or above). I have 2
customer  who  use  DEC  alpha 400 with NT4, running 24x7 since December
1996;  the  system  down only if electricity drop longer than UPS backup
time.

-- 
Best regards,

- Syafril -


Name  : Syafril Hermansyah  |Company: Duta Integrasi Pratama 
Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Voice  : (62) (21) 385-1600  
FAXto : (62)(21)351-9241 key:000FAX |URL: http://www.dutaint.co.id

Created : Thursday, March 09, 2000, 9:17:00 GMT +0700

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org




Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze

2000-03-07 Thread Pasquale J. Festa Sr.

Hello Simon,

March 07, 2000, 4:15:52 PM, you wrote:

S How-do-you-do,

S I have noticed that TB! very occasionally seems to freeze with Windows when
S I launch it just as I make a connection to the Net. It is always just as TB!
S launches at the same time the connection is opened. If I wait 3 secs (after
S ICMP  UDP packets finish broadcasting) I do not seem to get a problem. If I
S forget however, and manually launch TB! to quickly, TB! takes Windows into
S cold storage with it. Anyone had this problem?

S Slán anois, 

S  Simon  send private mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


S Usin' TB! v1.41 B/5  registered

S  !-- hide from brain dead browsers

S   L’homme est bien insensé. Il ne saurait forger un ciron, et forge des Dieux à 
douzaines!

S   (Man is quite insane. He cannot create a maggot, and he creates Gods by the dozen)

S   MONTAIGNE 1533-1592

S  //-- stop hiding from brain dead browsers


Yes, I noticed this also.

-- 
Best regards,
 Pasqualemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org




Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze

2000-03-07 Thread tracer

Hello Simon,
On Tue, 7 Mar 2000 21:15:52 + GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, March 08, 2000, 4:15:52 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Simon wrote:


 How-do-you-do,

 I have noticed that TB! very occasionally seems to freeze with Windows when
 I launch it just as I make a connection to the Net. It is always just as TB!
 launches at the same time the connection is opened. If I wait 3 secs (after
 ICMP  UDP packets finish broadcasting) I do not seem to get a problem. If I
 forget however, and manually launch TB! to quickly, TB! takes Windows into
 cold storage with it. Anyone had this problem?

Openning another program while The Bat is opening will kill my system.
Sure...
Its easy to do as well or to forget  it and then nothing helps except
a restart


Best regards,
 
tracer
-- 

Using theBAT 1.41 Beta/5 with Windows 98
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using FireTalk: 321338
ICQ: on request 
Website: www.phuketcomputers.com
Our special website hosting/mailservers are now operational



-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org




Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze

2000-03-07 Thread Januk Aggarwal

Hello tracer,


On  Tuesday, March 07, 2000  at  07:32:48 GMT +0700 (which was 4:32 PM
where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:


 Openning another program while The Bat is opening will kill my system.
 Sure...
 Its easy to do as well or to forget  it and then nothing helps except
 a restart

It is very annoying, especially since I don't remember TB doing this
in the past, only with 1.39 and above. Is there any Windows 98SE
setting that can prevent another application from opening while TB
starts up?


-- 
Thanks for writing
 Januk Aggarwal
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Using The Bat! 1.41 Beta/5
 under Windows 98 4.10 Build   A 

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org