Re: [ubuntu-art] Quick question for the WIKI regarding the range of what constitutes a "theme"

2008-07-10 Thread Brian Fleeger
>From: Salane Ashcraft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

>Honestly, there is one Canonical person who decides what goes in, and
>that is Ken. Mark has the final say so.
>As soon as I get more proposals, We will formulate a unified list,
>create a mockup, and the themes will create the theme.
>
>There really will not be competing concepts.There are things we are
>looking for, and things users want, so it is more effective if we work
>towards one common theme using the guideline/discussion
>mockup/discussion theme creation work flow.

Sounds good.  Will the Art Team community be privy to critiquing the final 
theme dev process, or will it be Canonical internal?

One more question: is Intrepid going to integrate a "main panel" look instead 
of the now-traditional three menu system (application, places, and system)?  If 
so, would ideas for its appearance and layout also be something up for Art Team 
design input?

Just curious,
Brian



  -- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Quick question for the WIKI regarding the range of what constitutes a "theme"

2008-07-10 Thread Brian Fleeger
From: Salane Ashcraft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 8:22 AM, Brian Fleeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>shadowh511
>>>Brian, I think that your guidelines should be posted as an attachment to
>>> the wiki page.

>> Sure, but how do I do that?  Do you mean like a sub-wiki page, or upload a
>> PDF?

>Perhaps as a wiki. That way its just right there. Ill suggest that to
>everyone then- make your own pages for guidelines. This could get
>lengthy.

Okay, I will do it later tonight.  

Can I suggest you put forth a standard label or title format for Art Team 
guideline proposals.  That way the guideline proposals will be clearly distinct 
from other incoming Intrepid art.

Also, I think there should be a clear cut-off date for guideline proposals.  
After all, eventually the Canonical folks are going to have to either choose 
one set of guidelines or assimilate the features they like into one official 
set.  That official guideline set will be the only way themers can really start 
creating competing concepts in time for the August cut-off deadline.

Regards,
Brian


  -- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Quick question for the WIKI regarding the range of what constitutes a "theme"

2008-07-10 Thread Brian Fleeger
>shadowh511
>Brian, I think that your guidelines should be posted as an attachment to the 
>wiki page.

Sure, but how do I do that?  Do you mean like a sub-wiki page, or upload a PDF?

Thanks,
Brian



  -- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Quick question for the WIKI regarding the range of what constitutes a "theme"

2008-07-09 Thread Brian Fleeger
From: Salane Ashcraft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Hi,
>>
>> So far, I have written up a very narrow, specific list of visual parameters
>> for a theme of the type one would download from Gnome-Looks.  However, I was
>> really hoping this make-over thing would also include some UI changes as
>> well.  In my write-up to the Art Team wiki, should I leave out all my UI
>> hopes and dreams?  Barring the key-hole arrows I had mentioned earlier, as
>> those are to be part of the nautilus window itself.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Brian Fleeger

>Anything and everything is appreciated. It all depends on what the art
>team decides on, and most importantly, what is possible theme wise.

Okay -- I typed up my design design parameters (with a big chunk directly 
stolen from New Wave's guidelines) and posted them to the art team WIKI page.  
I did not include *all* my user interface suggestions, because I know for a 
fact that many of my ideas are not implementable in so short a time.  

Let me know if you want/need more concept art.

Regards,
Brian



  -- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


[ubuntu-art] Quick question for the WIKI regarding the range of what constitutes a "theme"

2008-07-09 Thread Brian Fleeger
Hi,

So far, I have written up a very narrow, specific list of visual parameters for 
a theme of the type one would download from Gnome-Looks.  However, I was really 
hoping this make-over thing would also include some UI changes as well.  In my 
write-up to the Art Team wiki, should I leave out all my UI hopes and dreams?  
Barring the key-hole arrows I had mentioned earlier, as those are to be part of 
the nautilus window itself.

Thanks,
Brian Fleeger



  -- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Is it possible to customize the backward/forward buttons in Murrine?

2008-07-09 Thread Brian Fleeger
From: Salane Ashcraft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 1:04 AM, Brian Fleeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>Brian-
>>>This is the problem. Too much talk and not enough action. Actually, at
>>>this point, all talk and next to no action. Would you please make a
>>>list of things that yo think the new theme should be, and post them
>>>under your own section in the art wiki under the official art team
>>wiki page? This would be very helpful and will help direct us.

>> Sure, but I thought I had been posting on the official wiki the whole time.
>> Can you send me a link to the page where you want me to post and then I will
>> get to it tomorrow.  Right now I am exhausted though and have to get to bed.

>I meant the coordinated, official art team wiki regarding a community
>wide- created theme.
>https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incoming/Intrepid/Ubuntu_8%2e10_Theme_-_Art_Team

Oh, yeah, that page.  Let me make up a draft and then I will then post it to 
the wiki ASAP.

-Brian



  -- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Is it possible to customize the backward/forward buttons in Murrine?

2008-07-08 Thread Brian Fleeger
From: Salane Ashcraft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Brian-
>This is the problem. Too much talk and not enough action. Actually, at
>this point, all talk and next to no action. Would you please make a
>list of things that yo think the new theme should be, and post them
>under your own section in the art wiki under the official art team
>wiki page? This would be very helpful and will help direct us.

Sure, but I thought I had been posting on the official wiki the whole time.  
Can you send me a link to the page where you want me to post and then I will 
get to it tomorrow.  Right now I am exhausted though and have to get to bed.

Take care,
Brian



  -- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Is it possible to customize the backward/forward buttons in Murrine?

2008-07-08 Thread Brian Fleeger
>On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 12:28 AM, Brian Fleeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want to submit another, more plausible theme proposal to the Intrepid
> wiki, but I want to know if Murrine will allow for customizable
> backwards/forwards buttons in nautilus (as well as system-wide).  My idea is
> basically based on the current Human theme, but just tweeks some details to
> result in a whole new look.  Everything in this "look" is already available,
> except I want to include Alex Faaborg's Firefox3-style back/forward buttons
> as a nuance to enhance nautilus.

>>From: Salane Ashcraft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>That does look neat - and i have seen themes with customized buttons.
>>Just ask around...

That's great!  I cannot do theme coding myself, but if it is possible then the 
Canonical people should be able to pull it off pretty easily.

>>What is the theme you created on the wiki?  I really need for people
>>to discuss guidelines and start working on a unified theme, instead of
>>their own themes.

I have submitted two themes so far: Gimmie Human, and Long Term Vision (LTV).  
This will be my third.

https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incoming/Intrepid/Gimmie-Human
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incoming/Long_Term_Vision

Both of the previous themes I submitted were VERY complex, and would be almost 
impossible to implement in any reasonable time-frame.  I even started a 
launchpad site for Long Term Vision, but so far have not been able to motivate 
any themers to help.

In any event, I am now inclined to think a radical/drastic visual overhaul is 
neither necessary nor desirable.  The Human theme (minus its window borders) 
has always been my favorite.  Even though I never cared for the window borders 
or max/min buttons, the mellowness of Human is just the least jarring out of 
anything I have ever seen on GNOME-Look (outside of the apple clones).  I think 
the new theme should strive to be as inoffensive as possible to the greatest 
number of people, while still introducing reasonable UI improvements and subtle 
beauty.

Regards,
Brian



  -- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] How to provide more alternate wallpapers without influencing CD size requirements

2008-07-08 Thread Brian Fleeger
<


Re: [ubuntu-art] How to provide more alternate wallpapers without influencing CD size requirements

2008-07-07 Thread Brian Fleeger
- Original Message 

From: Cory K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

>A add-om package in the repos is the way to go. Trick is, letting people
>know about it.

Doesn't the "add-on pack" route expect users to have a-priori knowledge of how 
to use Ubuntu and Linux in general?  Further, add-on packs make it sound a 
little too close to "Ubuntu SP1."  

It also defeats the whole idea of user selected content (since it would be an 
all or nothing pack) -- and the user would not know what he/she is getting in 
advance, even if they did know to look for it.

The interesting part of my idea is that it would really enhance the user 
experience to be able to browse and choose exactly what you want from a 
selection where EVERYTHING is guaranteed to look beautiful.  It would be an 
opportunity to win user mindshare.

Its just an idea though, and I don't take it personally if you like it or not 
-- just something for you to consider.  If anyone does think it is worth 
passing along, please do so.

Regards,
Brian Fleeger



-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art



  -- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] How to provide more alternate wallpapers without influencing CD size requirements

2008-07-07 Thread Brian Fleeger
>- Original Message 

>From: Cory K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: Discussion on Ubuntu artwork 
>Sent: Monday, July 7, 2008 11:27:43 PM
>Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] How to provide more alternate wallpapers without 
>influencing CD size requirements

>What everyone doesn't think about is that this is forking app X that you
>want to put this feature in. Further adding to technical maintenance.

>Best to change the wallpapers in the current package and/or provide
>another add-on package that can be grabbed through the repos.

>-Cory

Actually, since it would be hosted by Canonical as opposed to Gnome, this would 
not be a fork.  Gnome gets used by many distros, but only Canonical would want 
to control their unique user experience.  Therefore it would only be 
appropriate for such a feature to be Ubuntu-specific, i.e. down-stream.

-Brian

-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art



  -- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


[ubuntu-art] How to provide more alternate wallpapers without influencing CD size requirements

2008-07-07 Thread Brian Fleeger
Hi all,

This is an idea I had to provide users with more alternate wallpapers without 
influencing the install CD's footprint.  If this is too off-topic for an 
art-team posting, please let me know and direct me to where this idea does 
belong.  At least it is tangentially related to Ubuntu's art experience.

In addition to providing a couple extra default alternate wallpapers, Canonical 
could host a special wallpaper repository the same way it does with synaptic 
and install/uninstall.  

Scenario: Grandma May is using her Ubuntu for the first time and wants to 
change the wallpaper.  She right clicks the desktop, sees "change wallpaper," 
and clicks through.  After seeing there are only 4 or 5 alternates (I am still 
optimistic), she notices the "Get More Ubuntu Wallpapers" button in the bottom 
right-hand corner of the nautilus window.  (if granny didn't have an internet 
connection, the box would be grayed out and unclickable)  She clicks it and is 
connected to a repository of pre-selected Ubuntu art works.  In the repo, she 
sees small icons, and can mouse-over/single click to see larger previews.  
After checking the boxes for the wallpapers she wants, Grammy clicks "Install 
Wallpapers" and is done.  Users could happily choose from hundreds of specially 
chosen backgrounds which have been selected for their color/composition to go 
well with the new Ubuntu default theme, instead of googling for hours for "free 
wallpapers."  Backgrounds could
 be arranged by topic, with options like "Select All Nature Wallpapers," etc.

Canonical could thereby 1) redefine the user experience, 2) gain more control 
over Ubuntu's aesthetic appeal, and 3) streamline the CD install image all in 
one swoop. 

Is this a good idea/something that could be passed on to relevent parties?

-Brian Fleeger



  -- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Again, top posting.

2008-07-06 Thread Brian Fleeger
- Original Message 

From: Conn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Discussion on Ubuntu artwork 
Sent: Sunday, July 6, 2008 12:09:17 PM
Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] Again, top posting.


>When you click reply in Gmail, do *not* 
>begin typing your reply where the cursor rests by default. Scroll 
>down and make your reply *underneath* quoted text, and as an
>optional (but highly recommended) step, delete unnecessary parts 
>of the quoted text.


Can I suggest posting the etiquette primer into the list-serve email sign-up 
sheet?  I am just figuring this out now too, and it seems like a lot could be 
avoided if people were forced to read about the rules in the process of signing 
up.  Alternately, there could be an automated first email for all new users 
that laid out the rules.  Otherwise this is going to be an endless back and 
forth as new people sign up.

Regards,
Brian Fleeger


  -- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


[ubuntu-art] Themers wanted for Long Term Vision in Launchpad

2008-07-03 Thread Brian Fleeger
Hi all,

I just made launchpad team and project sites for the Long Term Vision concept 
submission.  

Wiki: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incoming/Long_Term_Vision 
Launchpad Team:https://edge.launchpad.net/~long-term-vision-theme-team
Launchpad Project:https://launchpad.net/long-term-vision

I would like one or more (experienced) theme artists to collaborate in 
developing this concept.  I am a linguist by trade and an artist by hobby, but 
have no skills in programming and/or theming.   I am very flexible in terms of 
accepting new direction if I think something is a good idea, so anybody that is 
interested would have quite a bit of influence in the final look and feel of 
the product.  Nothing in LTV is written in stone, not even if it is to be a 
light or dark theme.

Even if you do not wish to contribute to the team directly, all are welcome to 
join the team just to take part in any polls we conduct.  After all, the larger 
the sample, the closer to the general population when it comes to judging 
consumer taste.  The group's list-serve email should be approved and up and 
running shortly.

Also, if anyone looks at the project's Blueprints page and can recommend 
someone else to fill some needed roles, please do a guy a favor and pass the 
word! ;)

Best,
Brian Fleeger



  -- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Suggestion for more wallpapers -- Re: Whats Up with This?

2008-07-03 Thread Brian Fleeger
>Actually, I can look into removing some screensavers and stuff. I'll talk to 
>some people and see what the possiblities are.

That's great!  I have a theory that so many screensavers are included by 
default not because there is an army of ardent supporters advocating their 
inclusion, but because they are part of some upstream programs that nobody has 
thought to remove yet.  Swapping them out for some more included wallpapers 
will really improve the user experience.  The first act of personalization for 
most users is to change the wallpapers, and the first place most users go to do 
that is the included alternate wallpaper folder.

Thanks, 
Brian



- Original Message 
From: Kenneth Wimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Discussion on Ubuntu artwork 
Sent: Thursday, July 3, 2008 5:31:34 AM
Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] Suggestion for more wallpapers -- Re: Whats Up with 
This?

On Thursday 03 July 2008 03:16:33 Brian Fleeger wrote:
> Salene -- Thanks, you are right to point out it is not art related.
>
> However, the two areas I point out have been the object of many legitimate
> critiques in the past from many press reviews of Ubuntu and in many a
> forum.  I do not think I am the first person to notice this.  From a design
> perspective, sometimes what you leave out is more important than what you
> include.
>
>
> Ken -- you sit at many tables and wear many hats; is cleaning up excess
> material something you could/would pass on to relevent parties?  If this in
> not within your range of authority, that is okay.  My only intention is to
> make Ubuntu a better end product.
>

Actually, I can look into removing some screensavers and stuff. I'll talk to 
some people and see what the possiblities are.

Ken

-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art



  -- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Suggestion for more wallpapers -- Re: Whats Up with This?

2008-07-02 Thread Brian Fleeger
Salene -- Thanks, you are right to point out it is not art related.  

However, the two areas I point out have been the object of many legitimate 
critiques in the past from many press reviews of Ubuntu and in many a forum.  I 
do not think I am the first person to notice this.  From a design perspective, 
sometimes what you leave out is more important than what you include.


Ken -- you sit at many tables and wear many hats; is cleaning up excess 
material something you could/would pass on to relevent parties?  If this in not 
within your range of authority, that is okay.  My only intention is to make 
Ubuntu a better end product.

Regards,
Brian


- Original Message 
From: Salane Ashcraft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Discussion on Ubuntu artwork 
Sent: Wednesday, July 2, 2008 7:33:44 PM
Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] Suggestion for more wallpapers -- Re: Whats Up with 
This?

These things are not art related... ou would have to bring this up with the 
other development teams if we decided to include more wallpapers.

Salane


On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 6:29 PM, Brian Fleeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Well, other than the outdated themes, there are two other major areas that I 
can recommend trimming some fat: the massive overstock of built-in 
screensavers; and the bloat of outdated games.  
 
Sorry to say it, but when was the last time anybody really needed to change 
their screensavers avery day for two years and never repeat? ;)  But seriously, 
most of those screensavers and games are pretty ugly and/or not fun.  I can't 
think the space might not be better used elsewhere, like including better 
wallpapers, which people do change frequently.
 
Anybody else want to chime in on areas that could be trimmed?
 
Regards,
Brian Fleeger



- Original Message 
From: Kenneth Wimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Discussion on Ubuntu artwork 
Sent: Wednesday, July 2, 2008 6:44:41 AM
Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] Suggestion for more wallpapers -- Re: Whats Up with 
This?

On Wednesday 02 July 2008 05:07:37 Brian Fleeger wrote:
> Ravindra makes a good point -- each release should have a better selection
> of alternate wallpapers.  I posted a bunch of open source photographs a few
> days back on the "Desktop Background Submissions" page, all taken from the
> WikiMedia site.  I selected each of them for their inherent mixture of
> brown with other lively colors (reds, blues, yellows, etc).  Incidentally,
> they would all look good with the dark theme in Alpha 1, or New Wave (the
> next heir apparent).  Though I include the link to the web sources below
> each photo, the links don't display properly and are only viewable by going
> into "edit" mode in the wiki.  I hope the art team will consider including
> them, or at least the idea of encouraging open source photography in
> general. Regards,
> Brian Fleeger

Until now the biggest problem with getting more pics in has been the size of 
the CD image. In Hardy we included one extra pic and I was hoping on 
including one or two more this time as well.

I'd also like to go through the gnome themes and remove all the older, 
outdated ones and include some nicer, newer stuff...perhaps that would be a 
subject on which everyone could vote.

--
Ken

-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


  -- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Suggestion for more wallpapers -- Re: Whats Up with This?

2008-07-02 Thread Brian Fleeger
Well, other than the outdated themes, there are two other major areas that I 
can recommend trimming some fat: the massive overstock of built-in 
screensavers; and the bloat of outdated games.  
Sorry to say it, but when was the last time anybody really needed to change 
their screensavers avery day for two years and never repeat? ;)  But seriously, 
most of those screensavers and games are pretty ugly and/or not fun.  I can't 
think the space might not be better used elsewhere, like including better 
wallpapers, which people do change frequently.
Anybody else want to chime in on areas that could be trimmed?
Regards,
Brian Fleeger



- Original Message 
From: Kenneth Wimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Discussion on Ubuntu artwork 
Sent: Wednesday, July 2, 2008 6:44:41 AM
Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] Suggestion for more wallpapers -- Re: Whats Up with 
This?

On Wednesday 02 July 2008 05:07:37 Brian Fleeger wrote:
> Ravindra makes a good point -- each release should have a better selection
> of alternate wallpapers.  I posted a bunch of open source photographs a few
> days back on the "Desktop Background Submissions" page, all taken from the
> WikiMedia site.  I selected each of them for their inherent mixture of
> brown with other lively colors (reds, blues, yellows, etc).  Incidentally,
> they would all look good with the dark theme in Alpha 1, or New Wave (the
> next heir apparent).  Though I include the link to the web sources below
> each photo, the links don't display properly and are only viewable by going
> into "edit" mode in the wiki.  I hope the art team will consider including
> them, or at least the idea of encouraging open source photography in
> general. Regards,
> Brian Fleeger

Until now the biggest problem with getting more pics in has been the size of 
the CD image. In Hardy we included one extra pic and I was hoping on 
including one or two more this time as well.

I'd also like to go through the gnome themes and remove all the older, 
outdated ones and include some nicer, newer stuff...perhaps that would be a 
subject on which everyone could vote.

--
Ken

-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art



  -- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Font suggestions

2008-07-02 Thread Brian Fleeger
For what it is worth, I have seen Android's simplified and traditional Chinese 
(Mandarin) fonts, and they were beautiful/extremely clear (I am a Mandarin 
linguist by profession).
-Brian Fleeger



- Original Message 
From: Kenneth Wimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Discussion on Ubuntu artwork 
Sent: Wednesday, July 2, 2008 1:21:02 PM
Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] Font suggestions

On Wednesday 02 July 2008 19:18:06 Ashton wrote:
> So how does Droid compare in terms of the language support mentioned
> earlier? Maybe it has broad support if it's main purpose is to support
> Android. Also, if Droid was made by the same people who made Liberation,
> maybe the metrics were given the same attention? IANAFE (I am not a font
> expert : p) so I wouldn't know. But I do recognize the
> importance/convenience.

From what I have read it is very good. Alas, I am also not an 
internationalization expert so I will refer this discussion to those in the 
company who are.

Ken

-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art



  -- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


[ubuntu-art] Suggestion for more wallpapers -- Re: Whats Up with This?

2008-07-01 Thread Brian Fleeger
Ravindra makes a good point -- each release should have a better selection of 
alternate wallpapers.  I posted a bunch of open source photographs a few days 
back on the "Desktop Background Submissions" page, all taken from the WikiMedia 
site.  I selected each of them for their inherent mixture of brown with other 
lively colors (reds, blues, yellows, etc).  Incidentally, they would all look 
good with the dark theme in Alpha 1, or New Wave (the next heir apparent).  
Though I include the link to the web sources below each photo, the links don't 
display properly and are only viewable by going into "edit" mode in the wiki.  
I hope the art team will consider including them, or at least the idea of 
encouraging open source photography in general.
Regards,
Brian Fleeger


- Original Message 
From: Ravindra Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 1, 2008 4:17:17 AM
Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] Whats Up with This?

I have a small suggestion to make, I have noticed that a normal Ubuntu live CD 
installation has at a maximum of 2 or 3 wallpapers by default while other 
distros such as Opensuse, Fedora, Linux Mint etc have at least 7 or 8. It would 
be nice if some of the art submitted at Ubuntu Art could be included also in 
the Live CD to give a user more choice.



  -- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


[ubuntu-art] Long Term Vision (LTV) concept posted -- anyone want to help?

2008-06-23 Thread Brian Fleeger
Hi all,

After struggling with my bad habit of wordiness, I finally posted the Long Term 
Vision concept.  I hope the art team will consider some of its ideas for 
inclusion in Intrepid Ibex.

It is viewable here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incoming/Long_Term_Vision. 
 

If you have any feedback, critiques, or areas you would like changed, please 
leave a note in the comments section on that wiki page (so I can keep track of 
everything).

Also, is the next step for me to start up a Launchpad project page?  I want to 
ask first so I don't gum up the works.  

Regards,
Brian Fleeger



  -- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Long Term Vision Theme

2008-06-23 Thread Brian Fleeger
Dear Nothlit,

Thanks for the advice on where to post.  I have still not posted the concept 
(still editing), so this helps.  I had read the section you cite on the 
Incoming page, but was nervous about posting outside the current release cycle 
area -- I thought it was for items which were never intended for implementation 
in the mainstream releases, i.e. optional themes and whatnot.  

Don't worry, contrary to advice, I had no intention of emailing Mark 
Shuttleworth! :)

Take care,
Brian


- Original Message 
From: nothlit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Discussion on Ubuntu artwork 
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 11:09:31 AM
Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] Long Term Vision Theme

> I am new to the art team, and would like to ask where would be the best
> place to post my new "Long Term Vision" theme, a follow-up to
> "Gimmie-Human."  I would ordinarily post a new theme directly under the
> Incoming/Intrepid sub-directory, but this is a very ambitious
> "re-envisioning" of Ubuntu and probably not totally implementable in one
> development cycle.  I would like to modularize aspects of the theme
> realization, such that work could begin under Intrepid, and then continue
> implementing other modules in subsequent releases until completion or
> another "vision" takes its place.
Its mentioned on the main Artwork (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork)
page, as well as the Incoming page, a little lower down. Obviously
this is not working, so if anyone has a suggestion to help make this a
little clearer, please email me :).

"If you have a complete concept that is meant to be developed outside
of the regular release cycle, such as Blubuntu--please use the
/PageTemplate and put your page in /Incoming. Keep it clear and
simple."
So, the correct place for items that lie outside the release cycle is
here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incoming Theres a form there
that will help you do that :). Make sure you keep us updated on the
situation in the list though!

For all reading this-- DO NOT email Mark Shuttleworth all your themes.
Submit all things to artwork lists and other places detailed under
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Documentation/GetInvolved, as well as
probably www.ubuntu-art.org :). The correct person to contact is the
Canonical Representive, Kenneth Wimer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).

What you have so far looks great but remember, the only developer
resources we have are the ones we can muster up ourselves :)

-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art



  -- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Long Term Vision Theme

2008-06-21 Thread Brian Fleeger
Hi Michael,

Oh, I see!  I think the indented look you mention may be an artifact of the low 
resolution I used to get the pictures to attach to my email.  Take a look at my 
pictures once I finish posting and then see what you think.  I use a brown 
rounded rectangle as a background for the notification area, with a 
non-gradated gray color, but no indentation.  

Thanks for getting back to me!

Regards,
Brian


- Original Message 
From: Michael McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Discussion on Ubuntu artwork 
Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2008 3:23:27 PM
Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] Long Term Vision Theme

> 2) Please specify what you mean by "notification area."

Notification area == system tray

-Michael

-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art



  -- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Long Term Vision Theme

2008-06-21 Thread Brian Fleeger
Shadowh511,

Most launcher type applications are totally flexible in terms of how you place 
them.  I beleive Michael was pointing out a perceived bad use of space in the 
"default" layout.  I was planning a section just on the topic of how to use the 
tabbed launcher bar, its interface, and screen location.  One cool thing is, I 
had previously gotten feedback from a couple of the guys on the Mayanna team 
that the launcher was completely feasible using their code.  I will contact 
them again after I post this iteration.  I beleive the man-machine interface I 
outline will be highly efficient and unlike any other OSs user experience.

-Brian


- Original Message 
From: shadowh511 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Discussion on Ubuntu artwork 
Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2008 11:54:04 AM
Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] Long Term Vision Theme

how about you can move the bar around?


-- 
Frank Lloyd Wright  - "TV is chewing gum for the eyes."



  -- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Long Term Vision Theme

2008-06-21 Thread Brian Fleeger
Dear Michael,

Thank you for your feedback.  I will post my work with larger images into the 
Intrepid wiki once I finish the text explaination.  

In answer to your points:
1) the precise placement on the bottom bar is totally fluid, and up to debate.  
I personally had considered placing it higher, up to about 1/3 up from the 
bottom, just to make it more aesthetically pleasing -- though your point about 
leaving more space for other functions is well taken!  I am totally upen to 
suggestions about what to put down there.  However, my gut reaction and part of 
the reason I removed the lower tool bar to begin with was to take up less panel 
space on smaller screens, and try to make the user interface more friendly, say 
like consumer electronics.  Too many panels confuses people and are just not 
easy on the eyes.  Of course placing other functions in the 4 corner areas 
(Fitt's Law) is always good in theory -- however I think it should not done in 
a way that sacrifices the look and feel of the interface.
2) Please specify what you mean by "notification area."  If you are refering to 
the main panel activated clicking the Ubuntu symbol, the version I present is 
the "pretty face" that includes clutter animations and allows for 
growing/shrinking tabbed icons.  A static version with icons of uniform size 
could be used on lower power systems without Compiz or Clutter enabled.  When 
using icons of static size, the active icon could be represented by a 
difference in brightness and contrast levels, and/or an icon outline.

Thank you for your input.  I will post my full work as soon as I am able!

Regards,
Brian Fleeger




- Original Message 
From: Michael McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Discussion on Ubuntu artwork 
Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2008 11:07:18 AM
Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] Long Term Vision Theme

Two thoughts on the theme:
1) I think that the bar at the bottom takes up too much space.  The
area below it isn't very "usable" so will end up being wasted space
for most people.
2) I don't like how the notification area's background is
significantly different than the recent of the panel's.  Having it
look "indented" might work very well, but it has to fit smoothly in
with the panel.

On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 10:55 PM, shadowh511 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In answer to your question on placing, I think that you should
> a. put an email on the list
> b. make a page on the wiki
> c. email mark shuttleworth (sp?) about the theme
>
> if you ask my opinion, i would pay $400 for the ubuntu theme you have
> pictured.  It looks like is can actually make my computer usage enjoyable :)
>
> --
> ubuntu-art mailing list
> ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
>
>

-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art



  -- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art