Re: Backporting dh_python2 stuff
Hi Loïc, Indeed your intuition on not backporting python-defaults/python agrees with mine. In cases like this, my recommendation is to make minimal source changes necessary to linaro-image-tools to make it build against lucid. Such source changes stand a much higher chance of being accepted, and much lower risk of causing unwanted side effects to other packages. John On Jan 29, 2011, at 10:08 AM, Loïc Minier wrote: Hey I'm trying to backport linaro-image-tools from natty to lucid in a PPA, and dh_python2 was only added in the python-defaults uploaded just after lucid, so l-i-t build-deps on python (= 2.6.5-1~). I'm not too keen on backporting python-defaults or python, so I wonder whether you folks faced such a case and how you handled it? Thanks! -- Loïc Minier -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 480547] Re: memcached pretty darn out of date.
ACK from Backports team for original backport plan: Backport the Karmic version to jaunty-backports, and then backport Lucid's version to Karmic. ** Changed in: jaunty-backports Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: jaunty-backports Status: Confirmed = In Progress ** Changed in: karmic-backports Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: karmic-backports Status: In Progress = Confirmed -- memcached pretty darn out of date. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480547 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is the registrant for Jaunty Jackalope Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 551200] Re: Please backport subdownloader 2.0.10-1
ACK from Backports Team. ** Changed in: jaunty-backports Status: Confirmed = In Progress -- Please backport subdownloader 2.0.10-1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551200 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is the registrant for Jaunty Jackalope Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 440512] Re: Backport easy PPA adding to hardy and jaunty
Switching to a Backports task. Did mvo say what package(s) would need to be backported for this, and if doing the backport of that package is likely to lead to any backwards-compatibility issues? -- Backport easy PPA adding to hardy and jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/440512 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 440512] Re: Backport easy PPA adding to hardy and jaunty
** Also affects: jaunty-backports Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: hardy-backports Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Backport easy PPA adding to hardy and jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/440512 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 440512] Re: Backport easy PPA adding to hardy and jaunty
** Changed in: software-properties Status: Confirmed = Invalid -- Backport easy PPA adding to hardy and jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/440512 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 550978] Re: Please backport subdownloader 2.0.10-1
subdownloader | 2.0.10-1 | lucid/universe | source, all ACK from Backports team ** Changed in: karmic-backports Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: karmic-backports Status: Confirmed = In Progress -- Please backport subdownloader 2.0.10-1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/550978 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is the registrant for Karmic Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 530972] Re: [SRU] usbmount in karmic
ACK from SRU team -- [SRU] usbmount in karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/530972 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 530945] Re: [SRU] keepalived in karmic
ACK from sru team -- [SRU] keepalived in karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/530945 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 530972] Re: Please backport usbmount 0.0.19.1 to karmic from lucid
This should be a SRU, not a backport... https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates -- Please backport usbmount 0.0.19.1 to karmic from lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/530972 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 411849] Re: Please backport security fix for USN-812-1 in subversion 1.5
The patch http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30423782/subversion_1.5.1dfsg1-1ubuntu2.1~hardy1.debdiff posted by Arnd looks reasonable to me, and should be applied to hardy- backports. This will require a core-dev sponsor to upload. The -backports team ACKs the debdiff and apologizes for the ridiculously and unreasonably long delay in getting this out :( -- Please backport security fix for USN-812-1 in subversion 1.5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411849 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 411849] Re: Please backport security fix for USN-812-1 in subversion 1.5
Wow, clearly the coffee didn't kick in well this morning I can upload the debdiff. Doing so now! -- Please backport security fix for USN-812-1 in subversion 1.5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411849 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 411849] Re: Please backport security fix for USN-812-1 in subversion 1.5
** Changed in: hardy-backports Status: New = Fix Committed -- Please backport security fix for USN-812-1 in subversion 1.5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411849 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 411849] Re: Please backport security fix for USN-812-1 in subversion 1.5
*groan* Looks like I'm not allowed to upload there anymore... Requesting core-dev sponsorship on said patch! ** Changed in: hardy-backports Status: Fix Committed = In Progress -- Please backport security fix for USN-812-1 in subversion 1.5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411849 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 302987] Re: Please backport bzr 2.0.2 from karmic-updates
Fortunately bzr fails in a reasonable manner (for the most part) when an incompatible plugin exists. But yeah, I'd like to take more of the plugins from karmic-updates. Ideally in future Ubuntu packaging (I didn't check if it's already the case), that the plugin packages have specific enough dependencies on the version of bzr required that we wouldn't have this problem again. Any volunteers for checking buildability of plugins from karmic-updates for hardy? -- Please backport bzr 2.0.2 from karmic-updates https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/302987 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 302987] Re: Please backport bzr 2.0.2 from karmic-updates
I'd be fine with approving the backport as-is due to the launchpad incompatible usecase, but are we also interested in backporting the most popular bzr plugins (i.e bzrtools?) as well? -- Please backport bzr 2.0.2 from karmic-updates https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/302987 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 504512] Re: Please backport lintian 2.3.1ubuntu1
ACK from backports team. ** Changed in: karmic-backports Status: Confirmed = In Progress -- Please backport lintian 2.3.1ubuntu1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/504512 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is the registrant for Karmic Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 350902] Re: [ubuntu 8.10] kio_imap4 hangs
ACK from -sru for kdepimlibs_4.3.2-0ubuntu1.1 ; proceed with upload and testing. Thanks! -- [ubuntu 8.10] kio_imap4 hangs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/350902 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is the registrant for Karmic Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 502071] Re: FH_DATE_PAST_20XX scores on all mails dated 2010 or later
ACK from the SRU team -- FH_DATE_PAST_20XX scores on all mails dated 2010 or later https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/502071 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 487429] Re: please backport bzr 2.0.0 from karmic
Oooh. Martin, we definitely want to take the opportunity to backport bzr 2.0.2 after-SRU and its entire stack to Jaunty. If the SRU seems to hit a snag or otherwise take too long, poke this bug report again and we'll take the 2.0.0 route (since as I understand it 2.0.2 can drop-in replace 2.0.0 without this big reverse-depends chase) -- please backport bzr 2.0.0 from karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/487429 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is the registrant for Jaunty Jackalope Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 487484] Re: [Backport Package] xz-utils
Can you elaborate on the rationale for this backport? -- [Backport Package] xz-utils https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/487484 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 483060] Re: Backport Decibel Audio Player 1.01
Thanks for the info. Testers, what are your opinions about the severity of this bug as far as user experience is concerned. Continue with backport or wait for 1.02? (Either way is fine with me) -- Backport Decibel Audio Player 1.01 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/483060 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is the registrant for Karmic Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 396384] Re: Please backport cython 0.11.2-1 from karmic to hardy, intrepid, jaunty
I love it when things come pre-tested! ACK from MOT^H^H^H^^H wrong one, need more sleep. ACK from Backporters for all 3 distros. ** Changed in: jaunty-backports Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: intrepid-backports Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: hardy-backports Status: New = In Progress -- Please backport cython 0.11.2-1 from karmic to hardy, intrepid, jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/396384 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 485168] Re: Please backport Hedgewars 0.9.12 to Karmic
ACK from backporters. ** Changed in: karmic-backports Status: New = In Progress -- Please backport Hedgewars 0.9.12 to Karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/485168 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is the registrant for Karmic Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 483060] Re: Backport Decibel Audio Player 1.01
Interesting bug. Probably upstream bug? -- Backport Decibel Audio Player 1.01 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/483060 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is the registrant for Karmic Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 482470] Re: Please backport ScrapBook
ACK from backporters. ** Changed in: karmic-backports Status: Confirmed = In Progress -- Please backport ScrapBook https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/482470 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is the registrant for Karmic Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 480547] Re: memcached pretty darn out of date.
Let's handle the two together: Doing a quick build test: Karmic's version backports cleanly to Jaunty and appears to work in my initial testing. Lucid's version backports cleanly to Karmic. Lucid's version does not backport to Jaunty because of pbuilder- satisfydepends-dummy: Depends: quilt (= 0.46-7) but it is not installable Given that, my initial solution would be Karmic-jaunty-backports and Lucid-Karmic Unless someone wants to look into the quilt build-dep. ** Also affects: jaunty-backports Importance: Undecided Status: New -- memcached pretty darn out of date. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480547 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is the registrant for Jaunty Jackalope Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 480545] Re: memcached hopelessly out of date
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 480547 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480547 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 480547 memcached pretty darn out of date. -- memcached hopelessly out of date https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480545 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is the registrant for Jaunty Jackalope Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 480547] Re: memcached pretty darn out of date.
Right; the Debian maintainer added a quilt dependency. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Prevu The Prevu tool is my perferred tool for quickly testing backports. After doing prevu-init's for Karmic and Jaunty, run prevu memcached/lucid to backport Lucid's version to the currently running distribution, or DIST=jaunty prevu memcached/karmic to backport Karmic's to Jaunty. -- memcached pretty darn out of date. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480547 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is the registrant for Jaunty Jackalope Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 216761] Re: [hardy-backports] errors in xendomains init script
** Changed in: hardy-backports Status: New = Confirmed -- [hardy-backports] errors in xendomains init script https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216761 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 216761] Re: [hardy-backports] errors in xendomains init script
Talked to ebroder in person and saw verification that intrepid-updates's version backports cleanly and works on Hardy. ACK from ~ubuntu-backporters for backporting xen-3.3 | 3.3.0-1ubuntu7.1 | intrepid-updates | source to hardy-backports. -- [hardy-backports] errors in xendomains init script https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216761 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 330968] Re: Please backport xmail-1.25
Would someone like to confirm the Intrepid version that's confirmed to build above runs in Hardy correctly? Apart from that, this backport looks suitable. -- Please backport xmail-1.25 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/330968 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 451804] [NEW] Backport prevu
Public bug reported: Prevu should be backported from karmic all the way down to jaunty, intrepid, and hardy. Most importantly this addresses the breakage of the default operation mode (fetch from Launchpad) due to the Launchpad UI change. I've tested this backport on all 3 releases, so I'm directly ACKing it. ** Affects: hardy-backports Importance: Undecided Status: In Progress ** Affects: intrepid-backports Importance: Undecided Status: In Progress ** Affects: jaunty-backports Importance: Undecided Status: In Progress ** Also affects: intrepid-backports Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: hardy-backports Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: jaunty-backports Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: intrepid-backports Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: hardy-backports Status: New = In Progress -- Backport prevu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/451804 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 430913] Re: Please backport nginx 0.6.35 to Hardy, Intrepid from Jaunty Security
Hi Jonathan, It is my oversight; The Confirmed state indicates that the backport has been verified by someone in the community to be appropriate. In Progress or Fix Committed should be set by a backports team member to indicate official blessing or sponsored upload for source-change backports, respectively. In this case, I've reviewed the debdiffs and sponsored them, and should've set to Fix Committed for both the Hardy and Intrepid tasks. I apologize for the confusion. -- Please backport nginx 0.6.35 to Hardy, Intrepid from Jaunty Security https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/430913 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 283137] Re: Please backport OpenOffice.org 3 to Hardy
Thanks, Mark, for chiming in. Indeed LTS does not imply that every major piece of newly released software will be backported, nor is the Backports team interested in trying to do so if it means sacrificing the stability or supportability of the OS... To move this forward, in my mind: (1) We don't need any more comments about why we need to move this forward. We understand that generally, folks would like to have the newest OpenOffice release. (2) Any additional dependencies needed to build OpenOffice on Hardy should be tracked down for us to decide if they are appropriate to bring in. (3) Furthermore, someone needs to step up to the plate in terms of promising that the (somewhat frequent) security fixes to OpenOffice will be backported too. A good first step is to attempt to get Karmic's OpenOffice building in a Hardy PPA with as few dependency backports as possible. P.S. I saw no evidence that the reason there isn't a Hardy OpenOffice backport is a lack of computational resources to build it. Chris's PPA states that he has limited time to maintain packages for all supported releases, which is understandably the case. -- Please backport OpenOffice.org 3 to Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/283137 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 283137] Re: Please backport OpenOffice.org 3 to Hardy
Mozilla Team dailies are in a PPA because they are experimental in nature; OpenOffice 3.1 has no reason to be unless the process of backporting it requires some insane procedure that makes them unsuitable for Backports' quality standards. The red tape to get it into Backports is solely demonstrating the ability to make the package in such a way that it doesn't unleash hell upon the users; the value of having it in backports instead of a PPA for the users is the peace of mind that comes with knowing that the Ubuntu team has deemed the package suitable for general adoption. Once the initial package is made, I don't imagine that backporting security fixes to it will constitute major work. However, the same could be said about our previous, say, Firefox backports but security fixes for those fell through the cracks as users became generally disinterested in the packages. -- Please backport OpenOffice.org 3 to Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/283137 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 283137] Re: Please backport OpenOffice.org 3 to Hardy
Yes, the version of OpenOffice shipped with Hardy LTS does have 3 year guaranteed security updates. I was saying that if a backport is done of a newer OpenOffice version, we need to make sure someone is willing to provide the same guarantee. -- Please backport OpenOffice.org 3 to Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/283137 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 308068] Re: gstm
This will be handled as a StableReleaseUpdate in the original bug. ** Changed in: intrepid-backports Status: Confirmed = Won't Fix -- gstm https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308068 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is the registrant for Intrepid Ibex Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 348865] Re: [hardy] libgsasl7-dev missing dependencies on libntlm0-dev, libkrb5-dev
(already fixed in Jaunty) ** Changed in: gsasl (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- [hardy] libgsasl7-dev missing dependencies on libntlm0-dev, libkrb5-dev https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348865 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 335692] Re: Please backport filezilla 3.2.2.1-1
Looks good to me. ACK from backporters ** Changed in: intrepid-backports Status: New = In Progress -- Please backport filezilla 3.2.2.1-1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/335692 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is the registrant for Intrepid Ibex Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 313598] Re: Please backport msmtp 1.4.16-1 from Jaunty to Hardy/Intrepid
ACK from backporters for msmtp 1.14.16-1; Hardy and Intrepid ** Changed in: hardy-backports Status: Confirmed = In Progress ** Changed in: intrepid-backports Status: Confirmed = In Progress -- Please backport msmtp 1.4.16-1 from Jaunty to Hardy/Intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/313598 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 323546] Re: xen-meta only depends on Xen 3.2 packages
ACK'ed and uploaded last debdiff. For the record, the IRC discussion was that (1) Alternate dependencies on 3.2/3.3 are just more confusing for the user and doesn't really offer anything additional -- you can't mix 3.2 and 3.3 and expect things to work, though these dependencies would allow it. (2) Creating new -3.2/-3.3 metapackages will pose headaches for upgrades. (2) Instead, we will offer pure-3.3 dependencies in hardy-backports such that it will take a dist-upgrade / explicit upgrade to install the backport, and it forces all the 3.3 packages to be installed. -- xen-meta only depends on Xen 3.2 packages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/323546 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: Security Policy of backported software
Strictly speaking, backports officially does not guarantee any period or type of support, which is why they are worded as unofficial updates in software sources manager. in reality, the backporters do address security issues in the backports repo on a best-effort basis and take care not to backport things that tend to lead to security maintenance issues. On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 12:29:52PM +1100, progr...@alphalink.com.au wrote: In reference to the following thread http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?s=19795d70673e4b282daf288ccb944f30t=1012712highlight=life+after+backports What happens to the security status of all the Backported software? Does the Backporting team supply security fixes for backported versions of the Gimp, etc, for the lifetime of your *ubuntu version? -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: make a backport package using pbuilder
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Schoap D schoapp...@gmail.com wrote: fakeroot debian/rules clean debian/rules:3: /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/debhelper.mk: No such file or directory debian/rules:4: /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/autotools.mk: No such file or directory debian/rules:5: /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/patchsys-quilt.mk: No such file or directory make: *** No rule to make target `/usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/ patchsys-quilt.mk'. Stop. When you use debuild -S to regenerate a source package, you need to have the cdbs and quilt packages installed, as the build dependencies and the above error messages state. It is necessary to evaluate the 'clean' target in the makefile. prevu works around this by using pdebuild's internal option (man pdebuild, search internal) which uses the pbuilder chroot to do all of this work. Of course it doesn't hurt to just install cdbs and quilt :D -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: make a backport package using pbuilder
Backport building is even easier. For the most part, no source changes are required. All you have to do is use dch -i to create a new changelog entry(*) acknowledging that it's a backport, then run pbuilder on this new source package. The exception is when the Jaunty version requires a new build dependency compared to the Intrepid. You can look at the debian/changelog entries to make an educated guess about whether or not that was necessary. Usually it's just for forcing a build against a newly uploaded library in Jaunty or Debian Sid and safe to remove, but when it's not, I've previously asked Ubuntu devs to make it very clear in the changelog that they weren't kidding when specifying a build dependency version (for example, nasty bugs in supporting libraries) (*) The new changelog entry should be a LOWER version number than Jaunty; this is so that when you upgrade, you are guaranteed to pull in the new Jaunty version. If your backport had the exact same or higher version number as the Jaunty package then APT may not consider it as needing to be upgraded, leading to confusion and dependency headaches in your next upgrade! The ~ operator in the version is very helpful: 1.2.3-1~foo is less than 1.2.3-1. So, Ubuntu convention is to append ~intrepid1 to the first attempted backport, ~intrepid2 to the 2nd, and so on. Various unofficial packages uses other ~suffixes so feel free to pick one that identifies your backports uniquely! P.S. Also see the prevu tool in the Ubuntu repos: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Prevu It's designed to automate this process in one fell swoop, such as prevu bash which goes to LaunchPad and automatically grabs the newest Jaunty sources for bash, and builds it. It is powered by pbuilder -- in fact it uses the pdebuild invocation of pbuilder. Prevu also functions just like the pdebuild command when you run it with no arguments within a Debian source directory so you can use it as a replacement for your pbuilder setup. On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 12:49 PM, Schoap D schoapp...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I followed some documentation and video tutorials about ubuntu packaging with pbuilder. Now I'm wondering how to make a backport package, let say from Jaunty for Intrepid, using pbuilder? Thanks in advance, \s -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: make a backport package using pbuilder
Where are you trying to upload it to? On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 7:56 PM, Schoap D schoapp...@gmail.com wrote: 2008/12/17 Schoap D schoapp...@gmail.com 2008/12/17 John Dong john.d...@gmail.com On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Schoap D schoapp...@gmail.com wrote: fakeroot debian/rules clean debian/rules:3: /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/debhelper.mk: No such file or directory debian/rules:4: /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/autotools.mk: No such file or directory debian/rules:5: /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/patchsys-quilt.mk: No such file or directory make: *** No rule to make target `/usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/ patchsys-quilt.mk'. Stop. When you use debuild -S to regenerate a source package, you need to have the cdbs and quilt packages installed, as the build dependencies and the above error messages state. It is necessary to evaluate the 'clean' target in the makefile. prevu works around this by using pdebuild's internal option (man pdebuild, search internal) which uses the pbuilder chroot to do all of this work. Of course it doesn't hurt to just install cdbs and quilt :D Ok thanks. One error message left: Successfully signed dsc and changes files Command line parameter [../nted_1.4.15_backports.dsc] is not a valid .dsc file name Does it cause any harm, the message above? How do I upload the build file? Its Bug #308989 Regards, \s -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: make a backport package using pbuilder
Ah, for official backports see the procedure at https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuBackports The procedure is more of a quality-assurance (testing) one rather than a build-and-upload workflow -- the build system takes care of the actual backporting work I'd recommend using prevu's build environment for testing backports; I've spent the time to make it work more or less out of the box without all this work :) On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 8:17 PM, Schoap D schoapp...@gmail.com wrote: First I need to solve this Command line parameter [nted_1.4.15-1ubuntu1.dsc] is not a valid .dsc file name I can t build it right now... About uploading... what is the next step after the request and the build of the package? Thanks, \s 2008/12/17 John Dong john.d...@gmail.com Where are you trying to upload it to? On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 7:56 PM, Schoap D schoapp...@gmail.com wrote: 2008/12/17 Schoap D schoapp...@gmail.com 2008/12/17 John Dong john.d...@gmail.com On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Schoap D schoapp...@gmail.comwrote: fakeroot debian/rules clean debian/rules:3: /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/debhelper.mk: No such file or directory debian/rules:4: /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/autotools.mk: No such file or directory debian/rules:5: /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/patchsys-quilt.mk: No such file or directory make: *** No rule to make target `/usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/ patchsys-quilt.mk'. Stop. When you use debuild -S to regenerate a source package, you need to have the cdbs and quilt packages installed, as the build dependencies and the above error messages state. It is necessary to evaluate the 'clean' target in the makefile. prevu works around this by using pdebuild's internal option (man pdebuild, search internal) which uses the pbuilder chroot to do all of this work. Of course it doesn't hurt to just install cdbs and quilt :D Ok thanks. One error message left: Successfully signed dsc and changes files Command line parameter [../nted_1.4.15_backports.dsc] is not a valid .dsc file name Does it cause any harm, the message above? How do I upload the build file? Its Bug #308989 Regards, \s -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports -- http://www.ubuntu-nl.org -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: make a backport package using pbuilder
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Schoap D schoapp...@gmail.com wrote: Ok, thanks. Is it just like a update process? apt-get source pakket wget newer version.tar.gz mv hello-2.3.tar.gz hello_2.3.orig.tar.gz tar xfz hello_2.3.orig.tar.gz cd hello_2.3/ zcat ../hello_2.2-2.diff.gz | patch -p1 dch -i No, it's even simpler than that. Remember that for a backport Jaunty already has the new package version. You are just recompiling it. dpkg-source -x hello.dsc cd hello-2.3 dch -i debuild -S pbuilder build ../new_version_backport.dsc How do I get the Jaunty package in a Intrepid environment? Or the source? You can use the Launchpad +source page, like https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bash Follow a version link to take you to a .dsc URL. Then just run dget -ux http://that_link/foo.dsc; Or see the attached script 'lpget'. For example, lpget bash fetches bash from jaunty and extracts it (equivalent to dget -ux, just it finds the dsc URL automatically); lpget bash/intrepid fetches bash from intrepid. lpget Description: Binary data -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 307239] Re: Please backport vlc to 0.9.8a in Intrepid
Right now we are considering doing this in intrepid-security directly; if that does not work out we will continue in the Backports route. -- Please backport vlc to 0.9.8a in Intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/307239 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 305344] Re: Banshee in Intrepid repositories needs update to 1.4.1
I have been told more or less by banshee-team and mono team that this backport is more or less undoable without breaking API compatibility and massive repackaging work. I'd recommend getting Banshee from the banshee-team PPA. -- Banshee in Intrepid repositories needs update to 1.4.1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/305344 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is the registrant for Intrepid Ibex Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 284508] Re: firefox 3.0.3 backport
This is due to the erroneous Breaks: relationship on yelp... I will fix this with the 3.0.4 backport. -- firefox 3.0.3 backport https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/284508 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Gutsy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 300034] Re: backport 1.9.0.3 breaks yelp 2.22.1
The Breaks: is superfluous; this will be resolved when I upload 3.0.4 in the coming day or two or three or four. -- backport 1.9.0.3 breaks yelp 2.22.1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/300034 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Gutsy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 250705] Re: Please backport ntfs-3g
ACK on 1:1.2506-1ubuntu2 (*INTREPID* version): This version I've been locally using for a long time with no problems; the Jaunty version I'm less confident about after the fresh merge. Let's wait until the new upstream version gets into Jaunty then look at Intrepid/Hardy backports of that version. ** Changed in: hardy-backports Status: Confirmed = In Progress -- Please backport ntfs-3g https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/250705 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 299156] [NEW] Firefox 3.0.4 backport
Public bug reported: Firefox 3.0.4 is out in hardy-security. We need to backport this to Gutsy. ** Affects: gutsy-backports Importance: Medium Assignee: John Dong (jdong) Status: Confirmed -- Firefox 3.0.4 backport https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299156 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Gutsy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 299156] Re: Firefox 3.0.4 backport
I'm going to take care of this. Expect PPA packages soon. ** Changed in: gutsy-backports Importance: Undecided = Medium Assignee: (unassigned) = John Dong (jdong) Status: New = Confirmed -- Firefox 3.0.4 backport https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299156 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Gutsy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 250705] Re: Please backport ntfs-3g
Builds in prevu with no source changes. Attempted a quick NTFS mount and nothing seemed to go wrong. AFAICT the mount options didn't change so rdepends like the mounting subsystem and such are not affected. This looks good for backporting. I'l let it sit here for a bit in case any of the other backporters have objections, but history has shown ntfs-3g stable releases to be quite reliable. ** Changed in: hardy-backports Status: New = Confirmed -- Please backport ntfs-3g https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/250705 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 284508] Re: firefox 3.0.3 backport
Approved already. ** Changed in: gutsy-backports Assignee: Ubuntu Package Archive Administrators (ubuntu-archive) = (unassigned) Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- firefox 3.0.3 backport https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/284508 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Gutsy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 293871] Re: Please backport evince 2.24.1 from Intrepid to Hardy
The evince 2.24.x release also provides some new format support, multimedia hotkeys, and other goodness. If the backport works it actually would be quite nice to have it. -- Please backport evince 2.24.1 from Intrepid to Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/293871 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 227464] Re: Please roll out security fixes from PHP 5.2.6
The security fixes in the mentioned PHP releases have been in the -security repositories for all supported distributions, over 3 months ago. A backport task is not necessary or appropriate for this case and the task has been marked invalid. -- Please roll out security fixes from PHP 5.2.6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227464 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 240136] Re: Please backport libmicrohttpd4 (0.3.1)
The debdiff looks decent, please continue :) -- Please backport libmicrohttpd4 (0.3.1) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/240136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 241560] Re: Please backport bugzilla 3.0 from Intrepid to Hardy
Debdiff looks good! -- Please backport bugzilla 3.0 from Intrepid to Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/241560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 267391] Re: Please Backport aMSN
Debdiff looks good, though IMO the first changelog entry should be
Backport from {Origin distribution} to {target distribution}. Remember
that users will be reading these through Update Manager which doesn't
intuitively show the version numbers to indicate what's going on.
--
Please Backport aMSN
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267391
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports.
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 284508] Re: firefox 3.0.3 backport
Yes, it is a security issue and why I wnated to revisit gutsy-backports particularly for this source-change backport. Serge, I can't reproduce your error: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# apt-cache policy xulrunner-1.9 xulrunner-1.9: Installed: (none) Candidate: 1.9.0.3+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.8.04.1~gutsy1~ppa1 Version table: 1.9.0.3+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.8.04.1~gutsy1~ppa1 0 500 http://ppa.launchpad.net gutsy/main Packages 1.9~b4+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~gutsy1 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com gutsy-backports/universe Packages 1.9~a8-0ubuntu2 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com gutsy/universe Packages [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# apt-get install xulrunner-1.9 Reading package lists... Done [...] 0 upgraded, 50 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 22.4MB/22.7MB of archives. After unpacking 78.8MB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y -- firefox 3.0.3 backport https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/284508 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Gutsy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 284508] Re: firefox 3.0.3 backport
xulrunner-1.9 and firefox-3.0 uploaded to gutsy-backports, awaiting archive admin approval. ** Changed in: gutsy-backports Assignee: John Dong (jdong) = Ubuntu Package Archive Administrators (ubuntu-archive) Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed -- firefox 3.0.3 backport https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/284508 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Gutsy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 289958] Re: Please backport gufw from Intrepid to Hardy
ACK from backporters ** Changed in: hardy-backports Status: New = In Progress -- Please backport gufw from Intrepid to Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/289958 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 289958] Re: Please backport gufw from Intrepid to Hardy
This would be neat to have -- do you know if gufw is 100% compatible with Hardy's version of ufw? Has the command set changed between Hardy and Intrepid? -- Please backport gufw from Intrepid to Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/289958 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 283137] Re: Please backport OpenOffice.org 3 to Hardy
I spoke with Chris today in detail about this, and he doesn't sound terribly confident yet that openoffice.org 3's final release is not going to have some major bugs discovered in the near future. Since he is most familiar with their release cycle and previous track record, I am going to go with his opinion on this. since it sounds like the side-by-side installation packaging is broken beyond repair for now, I am very wary about replacing Hardy's Openoffice with a version that is not very well tested (particularly since as of now the way to uninstall a backport and revert to the regular version for complex multi-deb packages is not supported/tested). Let's wait a bit and see how Openoffice is for Hardy. As far as Intrepid, I think we can be slightly less cautious but not that much so. Ideally it'd be nice to have a 3.0.1-type release before we go around replacing Openoffice. Since Ubuntu uses an ooo-build brand of Openoffice some of the large benefits of OOo3 (like Office 2007 XML support) has been available in our 2.4 builds for a while. Bottom line is I don't think anyone will suffer too greatly without it for a little bit while we carefully figure out our best path forward from here. -- Please backport OpenOffice.org 3 to Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/283137 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 284508] [NEW] firefox 3.0.3 backport
Public bug reported: I am updating the gutsy firefox backport to 3.0.3 from Hardy Security. Backports PPA packages will be available shortly but I will need testers to test the upgrade path and also look for regressions (particularly when it comes to plugins) ** Affects: gutsy-backports Importance: Medium Assignee: John Dong (jdong) Status: New ** Changed in: gutsy-backports Importance: Undecided = Medium Assignee: (unassigned) = John Dong (jdong) -- firefox 3.0.3 backport https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/284508 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Gutsy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 212468] Re: Backport Firefox 3.0 beta 5 from Hardy
Please follow new bug at https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/gutsy- backports/+bug/284508 for Firefox 3.0.3 final. ** Changed in: gutsy-backports Status: Incomplete = Won't Fix -- Backport Firefox 3.0 beta 5 from Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/212468 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Gutsy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 284508] Re: firefox 3.0.3 backport
The backport has been uploaded to the Backports PPA: https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-backporters/+archive It has not built yet but locally I've tested this on a Gutsy system with no detectable regressions ** Changed in: gutsy-backports Status: New = Confirmed -- firefox 3.0.3 backport https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/284508 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Gutsy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 284692] Re: Please backport OpenOffice.org 3.0 to Hardy
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 283137 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/283137 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 283137 Please backport OpenOffice.org 3 to Hardy -- Please backport OpenOffice.org 3.0 to Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/284692 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 284688] Re: Please Backport MySQL 5.0.67 from intrepid to hardy
I personally do not feel comfortable backporting commonly-used server packages that have a long track history of needing security update maintenance because inevitably people lose interest and we cannot guarantee the same 18 months or 5 years of security updates that the Security Team can. Are there any compelling reasons why this backport is worth it, other than the version number? -- Please Backport MySQL 5.0.67 from intrepid to hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/284688 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 279115] Re: please backport gimp 2.6.0 from intrepid
pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy: Depends: libwebkit-dev which is a virtual package. Depends: libgegl-0.0-dev which is a virtual package. Depends: libbabl-0.0-0-dev which is a virtual package. Looks like we'll need to do some build-dep tweaking and new library backports. -- please backport gimp 2.6.0 from intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/279115 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 274399] Re: Add vlc in hardy backports ?
If you are referring to the 0.8.6.* security fix series, this is already in progress for ubuntu-security. If you are referring to the 0.9.x releases, I am not sure if this will be possible. I was a part of the team that packaged this release for Intrepid and I'm almost confident it relies on specific newer libraries in Intrepid. -- Add vlc in hardy backports ? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/274399 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 268602] Re: backport bazaar
Yeah, this would be a nice backport but first we need to look at all of the dependencies (bzr plugins) to see if they're all compatible. -- backport bazaar https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268602 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 267494] Re: Please backport ktorrent to 2.2.7
The KTorrent 2.2.x branch is gone from Ubuntu and superseded by the 3.x.x branch; I'm not sure how to handle this situation for Backports. -- Please backport ktorrent to 2.2.7 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267494 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 257211] Re: please backport rsync 3 from Intrepid to Hardy
Debdiff looks good, only I'd suggest a comment for why the status stanza was commented out (i.e. LSB too old in Hardy) in the init script for confused sysadmins. -- please backport rsync 3 from Intrepid to Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257211 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 262460] Re: Please backport dkms 2.0.20.4
I'll trust superm1's discretion on this. ACK from backporters. ** Changed in: hardy-backports Status: Triaged = In Progress -- Please backport dkms 2.0.20.4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/262460 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 262834] Re: Please backport wesnoth 1:1.4.4-2 from Intrepid
Is there a corresponding -data package that needs to be backported, or is wesnoth the only one? -- Please backport wesnoth 1:1.4.4-2 from Intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/262834 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 262469] Re: Please backport etl from intrepid
ACK from backporters, to be backported with synfig and synfigstudio ** Changed in: hardy-backports Status: Triaged = In Progress -- Please backport etl from intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/262469 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 261684] Re: Please backport msn-pecan 0.0.14-3 from intrepid.
ACK from backporters: msn-pecan | 0.0.14-3 | intrepid/universe | source, amd64, i386 ** Changed in: hardy-backports Status: Triaged = In Progress -- Please backport msn-pecan 0.0.14-3 from intrepid. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261684 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 260642] Re: please backport freevo
ACK from backporters: freevo |1.8.1-0 | intrepid/universe | source, all ** Changed in: hardy-backports Status: Triaged = In Progress -- please backport freevo https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/260642 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 221401] Re: please backport rdiff-backup so Gutsy can backup and restore to and from Hardy
ACK from backporters ** Changed in: gutsy-backports Status: Confirmed = In Progress -- please backport rdiff-backup so Gutsy can backup and restore to and from Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/221401 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Gutsy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 191796] Re: Please backport firefox-3.0 3.0~b4 final
** Changed in: gutsy-backports Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- Please backport firefox-3.0 3.0~b4 final https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191796 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Gutsy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 195896] Re: Please backpart Wine 0.9.58
** Attachment added: debdiff of 0.9.59 for gutsy-backports http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13309179/debdiff -- Please backpart Wine 0.9.58 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195896 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Gutsy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 195896] Re: Please backpart Wine 0.9.58
FTBFS, will handle as sourceful backport to Gutsy of 0.9.59 ** Changed in: gutsy-backports Status: Fix Released = Confirmed -- Please backpart Wine 0.9.58 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195896 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Gutsy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 212468] Re: Backport Firefox 3.0 beta 5 from Hardy
You wouldn't be the first one to complain about that I'm hearing lots of bad stories about 64-bit and Flash interactions Personally on gutsy32 it seems to work fine for me but I see nothing substantial over beta4 in this release. I'm glad we did the b4 backport first. -- Backport Firefox 3.0 beta 5 from Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/212468 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Gutsy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 208836] Re: Feature Freeze Exception request for Transmission 1.10
Sorry for the bug spam, momentary lack of judgement. ** Also affects: hardy-backports Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: hardy-backports Status: New = Invalid ** Summary changed: - Feature Freeze Exception request for Transmission 1.10 + Backport bugfixes from Transmission 1.1x for Hardy ** Description changed: - Transmission 1.10 has now been released. Apparently a lot of bugs have - been fixed and some new features added. + -- Revised Description -- + + While it is too intrusive to update to a new version of Transmission for + Hardy, the release does contain a lot of worthwhile bugfixes. We have + decided to backport just the bugfixes to Hardy's 1.06 release. + + At the same time, the latest version of Transmission 1.1x will be + provided in the hardy-backports repository around the same time as + Hardy's release, for early adopters. The progress for this will be + tracked in a separate bug report + + + -- ORIGINAL DESCRIPTION -- + Transmission 1.10 has now been released. Apparently a lot of bugs have been fixed and some new features added. http://www.transmissionbt.com/ http://trac.transmissionbt.com/query?groupdesc=1group=componentmilestone=1.10order=priority -- Backport bugfixes from Transmission 1.1x for Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/208836 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 208836] Re: Backport bugfixes from Transmission 1.1x for Hardy
Everyone: Note the updated description of the task. Since ClamAV needs a similarly intrusive update, the Backports team has decided to open up Hardy Backports earlier this release cycle, so we will handle the new 1.1x branch in Backports on a timely manner. At the same time, we will go forward with applying Charles's patches to the Hardy 1.06 package. For this to continue, Charles, can you separate out your patches into one change per patchfile? We will add a patch system into the Transmission package if necessary. This will facilitate reviewing and maintaining the package for Hardy. Thanks! ** Changed in: transmission (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist = Medium Status: Incomplete = Triaged -- Backport bugfixes from Transmission 1.1x for Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/208836 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 213682] [NEW] Pre-backport Transmission 1.11 to Hardy
Public bug reported: Transmission 1.11 is out and contains many new feature enhancements, but is too risky to include directly in Hardy this late in the release cycle. Therefore we will handle it as a pre-backport to gutsy and forwards- port it to Intrepid as soon as it opens for uploads. ** Affects: hardy-backports Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Pre-backport Transmission 1.11 to Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/213682 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 208836] Re: Backport bugfixes from Transmission 1.1x for Hardy
I added a patch system while we await the splitting out of patches. ** Attachment added: Debdiff up to transmission 1.06-0ubuntu5 (add dpatch) http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13197466/transmission.debdiff -- Backport bugfixes from Transmission 1.1x for Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/208836 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 212692] [NEW] Backport bzr 1.3.1 stack from Hardy
Public bug reported: Let's freshen up our aging bzr in Gutsy: bzr_1.3.1~rc1-0ubuntu1 bzr-builddeb_0.93ubuntu1 bzr-svn_0.4.9-1 bzrtools_1.3.0-2ubuntu1 Please backport the above source packages from Hardy. (bzr-gtk still compatible) ** Affects: gutsy-backports Importance: Undecided Status: In Progress -- Backport bzr 1.3.1 stack from Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/212692 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Gutsy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 195896] Re: Please backpart Wine 0.9.58
** Changed in: gutsy-backports Status: Confirmed = In Progress -- Please backpart Wine 0.9.58 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195896 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Gutsy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 212696] Re: firefox 3, file:// and hidden files misbehavior
I tried to report this but I could not reproduce these symptoms The show hidden objects filter works perfectly on my home directory with firefox 3.0b5 and b4 -- firefox 3, file:// and hidden files misbehavior https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/212696 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Gutsy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 212694] Re: firefox 3.0-b5-ppa segmentation fault
This would appear like a bug in your custom theme's gtkrc. Most likely Firefox simply didn't trip it before but now that GTK integration has been further improved Firefox attempts to use that portion of your theme. ** Changed in: gutsy-backports Status: New = Incomplete -- firefox 3.0-b5-ppa segmentation fault https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/212694 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Gutsy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 208091] Re: firefox will not open local files from remote files
I can reproduce this on Hardy, let's move this bug report into Hardy. (I'm also unsure if this is a bug or just a security feature with a poor UI ** Changed in: gutsy-backports Status: New = Incomplete ** Changed in: gutsy-backports Status: Incomplete = Invalid ** Also affects: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- firefox will not open local files from remote files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/208091 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Gutsy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 205036] Re: please backport psi ( http://psi-im.org )
psi | 0.11-3 | hardy/universe | source, amd64, i386, powerpc This version is in Hardy. Is it ok to backport too? ** Changed in: gutsy-backports Status: New = Incomplete -- please backport psi ( http://psi-im.org ) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/205036 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Gutsy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 206570] Re: virt-manager is not installable
Looks like we need these backports: python-virtinst | 0.300.2-0ubuntu3 | hardy/universe | all (src pkg: virtinst) python-gtk-vnc | 0.3.4-0ubuntu1 | hardy/universe | amd64, i386, powerpc They are both new Hardy packages so they should be trivial backports -- virt-manager is not installable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/206570 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Gutsy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 207031] Re: Please backport Inkscape 0.46 from hardy to gutsy
ACK from backporters: inkscape | 0.46-0ubuntu1 | hardy | source, amd64, i386, powerpc ** Changed in: gutsy-backports Status: New = In Progress -- Please backport Inkscape 0.46 from hardy to gutsy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207031 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Gutsy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 191796] Re: Please backport firefox-3.0 3.0~b4 final
Scott, the debdiffs in comment #25 (not the attached ones) apply against the respective Hardy versions they are derived from. As of 3 hours ago we've gotten new Firefox packages in Hardy, which I am *NOT* interested in backporting right now due to widespread reports on the internet(s) of CPU usage regressions and possibly packaging regressions. The beta4 packages, however, I have been using on three systems for a long time with no problems. The dsc links to full sources are available in that comment too which may be more convenient for you to use. ** Changed in: gutsy-backports Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- Please backport firefox-3.0 3.0~b4 final https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191796 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Gutsy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
