[ubuntu-studio-devel] Owner ship of the core-team
Hi! For the record i have transfered ownership of the US-core team to eeickmeyer (https://launchpad.net/~ubuntustudio-core) Sorry it took so long. I don't have any good explanation for it: i just kept forgetting. I hope this hasn't caused any troubles or delays. I put my subscription to automagically be canceled on may 31st in order to give some time in case something would have gone wrong and avoid ending up locking us out. Pretty sure everything is fine though. Regardless how short of time i managed to dedicate to the project, and the fact that i wasn't able to be involved for as long as i had committed, which i am very sorry for, It's been a honor to work with each and everyone of you. I will stay in the PR team and maybe documentation... Either-way i will probably pop up here and there to cheer and help when i can. Have a great week everyone! -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer PGP Fingerprint: FB69 71E5 717F 6537 7B60 DEC1 9240 1D3F 102A 0208 I prefer encrypted mail. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
[ubuntu-studio-devel] New Owner for ubuntustudio-core team
Hi List, As you've probably noticed, I'm not contributing anymore. Luckily, there are still motivated members left and lately it looks like their number is growing. Something I'd like to thank the remaining members and the new coming ones for! I just don't seem to find the time/energy to write an official step-down thing, and i probably wont for some time ahead. However, I'm taking this moment to write an official "step-up" thing: someone needs to have the ownership of the ubuntustudio-core team, I think the best suited contributor currently for this is Erich Meyer. Therefor, unless someone argues against it with a solid reason, i will make him owner of the ubuntsutdio-core team. Have a good week everyone, -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Meeting Notes 2018-04-14
Great meeting notes! On 2018-04-15 05:21, er...@ericheickmeyer.com wrote: > Set, is there anybody besides yourself or Ross that can merge items into > the official repos? As far as i remember, none of us has upload rights. And we need sponsors for that. TBH, except the social process to get upload rights, i never managed to wrap my head around how this worked. > This list must be approved by Set Hallström as project lead. > > > > * Erich Eickmeyer (ErichEickmeyer) – (I have been acting as chair, if > there aren’t any objections I’m okay with that) > * Eylul > * Thomas Pfundt (captain-tux) > * Len Ovens (OvenWerks) > * Krytarik I approve of this. I'd add myself to the list, but i'm not in a position to make such commitments. I'll do my best to add when- and wherever i can be useful according to the agenda the committee agrees upon. Regarding the website, 2 request to join the website team were sent out: one from Thomas Pound (captain-tux) and one from Ryan Hoover (rhoover84) Thomas Pfundt, Pound... i suppose this is your account; will you please confirm? https://launchpad.net/~captain-tux I apologize for missing the meeting or if my memory is blanking on your name Ryan.. i see you're an old-timer on launchpad and such (https://launchpad.net/~rhoover84) but can i get a confirmation from the team that this request should be honored? :) Thanks everyone! -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Sunday Meetings (was: US still alive !)
On 2018-04-05 19:09, Erich Eickmeyer wrote: > I’ll keep funky ideas and impossible stuff to myself. :) Please don't! If we censor ourselves for fear of saying something wrong, perhaps we are going to miss out on something brilliant! Of course, not everything will always work and one needs to be ready to be contradicted and learn. But put the ideas on the table _without discrimination_ so we can all contemplate them and pick the best ones together. :) -- Set Sakrecoer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
[ubuntu-studio-devel] Attention
First of all, Please. Chill. Out. Everyone. (including me) This said, Ralf you are _not_ helping here. You're welcome to assist new users, but as long as you keep grinding that tone: you are *not* helping. We know you know your stuff. Cool! If you want to participate with development: be considerate. Otherwise, hands off the devel-list. I will however ask /everyone/ to stick to that too: reacting to whomever's clumsy (if not intentional) ways, is _not_ helping. There will always be someone to nurture the negativity. Don't give them the space for it. I am afraid i am currently not equipped with the mental health necessary to moderate the discussion in any other constructive way the this. I don't ask you to understand but this means if you want things to happen, you are going to have to moderate yourselves. Second of all, I've been told there is no need for signing the CoC. It was the first thing i was asked, and i adhere to it. I think it is a good way to signal that you have at least read it and agree with it. But as it seems, is not necessary. I apologize if that wasted your time, and I know your time is precious, believe me. Thank you for your attention, have a good day. -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Gaining Wiki Edit Permissions
On 2018-04-02 14:18, Set Hallstrom wrote: > I don't know what kind of process is best. But it's a question that > should be asked to ubuntu at large; ubuntustudio alone doesn't have much > say in it. i mean... we do have a say, but said process can only be improved if discussed with _everyone_ involved with it. -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Gaining Wiki Edit Permissions
After spinning this in my head a few times: On 2018-04-02 13:27, Set Hallstrom wrote: > I'm not saying it's a prefect process, and i agree that beggars can't be > choosers. But it is my opinion that we need some kind of sign of moral > commitment to the project, or we could as well just make everything public. I'd like to add that there are many good reasons, as you mention, to want to allow users to sign the CoC directly from launchpad, but removing the manual steps would also potentially open for easier automation of that process to spam-bots. I have had a long and unresolved internal struggle about the dilemma of making things easier at the cost of leveling things to lowest denominator. On one hand, i understand that most users don't want to struggle with computing per-se and rather get on with using the computer for their production purpose without having to know how the tools work behind the scene. On the other hand in an ever more digitalized society, this makes me sad: I'd wish more users would be inclined to take control over their tools. I don't know what kind of process is best. But it's a question that should be asked to ubuntu at large; ubuntustudio alone doesn't have much say in it. -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Gaining Wiki Edit Permissions
On 2018-03-31 06:34, Mike Lococo wrote: > Set, [.snip] > Signed. Thanks! I'll poke around as soon as i get the time. I think we have a ubuntustudio group that has access to the wiki, but i need to remember which one. ( i think it shoulld be: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntustudio-documentation feel free to request addition to it. ) > But even as someone who knows their way around GPG, that was > harrowing. No musician or artist experimenting with linux on a > live-usb for the first time is going to successfully navigate that > process to correct a wiki typo. I don't know if that means it's only > worth recruiting among existing ubuntu contributors, or we need to > find ways to get people involved outside launchpad... but anyone with > a half an hour to get their feet wet is going bounce off that process > and never return. > > If any other new folks find the code-of-conduct signature process as > mystifying as I did, this was the simplest guide I found (though the > key-import screenshot is wrongly about ssh-key import, which is > different than the gpg-key import you need to do to sign the CoC): > https://www.wikihow.com/Sign-the-Ubuntu-Code-of-Conduct > > Cheers, Lococo I understand GPG is cumbersome and a bit hard to wrap one's head around. This said, so is development. Musicians, Artists, designers etc, are welcome to help developing, but there is no short cut to it: you need to learn the tools to do it and they are rarely very artistically intuitive. However these type of contributors are often more comfortable with PR, documentation and promotion. That means signing the code is the most abstract thing they'll have to do. I'm not saying it's a prefect process, and i agree that beggars can't be choosers. But it is my opinion that we need some kind of sign of moral commitment to the project, or we could as well just make everything public. I hope i make sense. Perhaps the entire embarking process is a good place to start with the documentation update? Thank you for taking the time, Mikelococo! -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] US still alive !
Hi Thomas! Good to read you :) On 2018-04-01 15:02, Thomas Pfundt wrote: > Hi Set and all others, > > on the general topic: Back in February when Ross Gammon asked for > help with the 16.04.4 ISO-testing, he also mentioned the possible > formation of a new project council. Two other members of the mailing > list and I have already offered our assistance in our own respective > areas of proficiency. (I don't know if I should tentatively mention > their contacts, but they're probably reading reading this list and > can join in at their own sentiment.) > I've basically been waiting for a word on some kind of get-together > to discuss roles or division for what's on the road map, but I might > have misunderstood something. The call to get together should have been made by the project lead, that was me, but as it turned out, i simply couldn't. I do however think that projects that are driven by volunteers needs someone/someones to take action from the discussions. I know not everyone have the time, will, or initiative to do so. What I'm trying to say is that, if you feel you want to set-up a meeting you should feel free to go ahead and do so by inviting everyone to attend on a given date in a given chat room. :) For the record, for that purpose we use IRC because it is transparent, and discussions are logged here: https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ > I'll look into signing the code of conduct myself right now and try > to get a better overview of the current state of everything. > Anyway, I'll be available throughout this year and help with what I > can, so "count me in". > > > Kind regards, Thomas > Thank you very much Thomas!! <3 -- Set Sakrecoer -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] photos for wallpapers or twitter
On 2018-03-29 21:09, pc...@laposte.net wrote: > Hi everyone ! > > If needed i can send by mail my photos for wallpapers > (when I was a student in public law I worked for magazines so I made > thousands of photos) Maybe some of them are usable. > And they havent been sent to magazines of course > > best regards > > Thanks pcmao! In the past, what we have done for wallpapers are contests where we invite the community to send propositions to a flickr account and then we setup votes for the 20 most popular ones. If you are interested in organizing such a contest, it would be of great value! :) It tends to invest the users and generate good PR/promotion. Either way, you are welcome to share links to your wallpapers on the user mailing-list: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users (note that links are better. It's general good practice to avoid attaching large files to your email when sent to mailing-list.) The user-list could really need some activity, why not initiate a wallpaper exchange-thread on there? :) Warm regards from cold swede, -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Gaining Wiki Edit Permissions
Hi Mike! Welcome! :) On 2018-03-27 05:08, Mike Lococo wrote: > Hi, > > I've seen the calls for assistance in maintaining ubuntu-studio. I'm > a long time user who has never contributed, I think it's the best > live distribution available for audio work, and I want to help ensure > that it continues to be available. I've maintained small open-source > projects, been an active community member in big ones, done some deb > packaging work, and know my way around linux internals very well. > I've never contributed to Debian or Ubuntu beyond bug-reports, > though. At this time, I'm not offering to take over maintainership or > join the proposed council, but I'd like to level up my ability to > contribute by finding work that needs doing and doing it. My sincerest apologies for the late response. Your email gave me a huge smile just like the ones from the other people who have stepped forward lately. :) THANK YOU! <3 Your contributions, however small or big are most welcome! > > My first step was to read the the wiki. There's a lot of great info > there. But I found some mistakes (the latest version is listed as > 15.10) and I think I can improve the > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/JoinTheTeam page by adding a "My > First Contribution" section with a little hand-holding on how to do a > simple things like make your first wiki edit or triage your first bug > (once I figure out how to do that). > > I found that I don't have wiki edit access though. I read > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/HelpContents and now my application to join > ubuntu-wiki-editors is pending at > https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-wiki-editors. My Launchpad and Ubuntu > One account has been idle for years, though, and I'm a little worried > my application will languish or be rejected because someone thinks > I'm a bot or a hacked account. I'M NOT! I'm resurrecting old accounts > to try to help here. If anyone sees anything wrong with my > application, let me know, and if there's a danger of it being > rejected and there's anything a contributor with more history can do > to vouch for me I'd appreciate it. The wiki needs and diserves a lot of work. This would be a great place to begin contributing. I'll see what i can do to accelerate you getting edit permission. I would just need you to sign the Code of conduct of ubuntu before i go ahead with that. https://askubuntu.com/questions/100275/how-do-i-sign-the-ubuntu-code-of-conduct > > Here's my launchpad account: https://launchpad.net/~mikelococo and > you can see it pending approval at > https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-wiki-editors. > > My next goal will be to try to get permission to triage bugs. I > assume I'll figure out how to do that while trolling around the wiki, > but if anyone wants to jump start the permission process I'm all > ears. > > Cheers, Lococo > For the part with the bugs, i'm not very good at how it works... I used to know more, but i've kindof lost it. Hoping someone can fill in for me here We used to have a contributor with a lot of experience about it, but who prefers communicating over IRC. If you are familiar with that communication protocol, try your luck and see if Krytarik is around in #ubuntustudio-devel. Oven Werks is very good at it too. I don't know how available they are atm though, and we have to respect it if they are busy: life is what it is. And everyone involved is doing it out of pure generosity. Either way, once again, THANK you for stepping forward <3 -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] US still alive !
On 2018-03-29 15:11, Set Hallstrom wrote: > Hi, PS. Sorry for top-posting, i've lost my hand in the good habits of the mailing-list game. I'll work on it. -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] US still alive !
Hi, Yes, the social media could need more love. cfhowlet used to do a good job with it. But his time is also limited. Managing the socialmedia is very time consuming and requires fairly quick response. And then there is creating content to have something to post.. However, i can't even begin to describe how much hope i'm feeling from reading you, Erich and pcmao: if you are willing to donate the necessary time and energy, you are most welcome! :) For facebook there is no need for password, i can make you a moderator, or whatever they call it. For twitter, i need i can make you a team member with twitters "tweetdeck.twitter.com" Than there is the youtube channel. And i think the same applies there. So no need for passwords anymore... I need you both to sign the code of conduct before though. @Erich: I'm glad to see you are using the GPG key. I wasn't able to locate your launchpad profile, will you send it to me? @pcmao: can you also provide me with your launchpad profile link? In case you are struggling with it, here is a howto: https://askubuntu.com/questions/100275/how-do-i-sign-the-ubuntu-code-of-conduct Looking forward to have you on board! *Set On 2018-03-28 22:05, Erich Eickmeyer wrote: > I have a lot of ideas to help revitalize Ubuntu Studio, but I’m, > unfortunately, not the one with the keys to the social media sites. > Alan Pope of Canonical is now aware that I’m on the project, and > maybe we’ll see where things go from there. As for the social media > accounts, I don’t even know who would have the keys to those in order > to get some publicity out there, but maybe Set might know. Either > way, it’s good to see some attention being drawn. > >> On Mar 28, 2018, at 11:49 AM, lukefro...@hushmail.com wrote: >> >> What is probably going on is that linux users are installing the >> base system, then using online search tools to find what programs >> they need for their workflow and installing those programs.. >> >> On 3/28/2018 at 12:22 PM, pc...@laposte.net wrote: >>> >>> "That is something I hope to rectify. Since I have deep contacts >>> with some of the most listened-to linux podcasts, I hope to get >>> the word out that we’re still a thing." >>> >>> Of course you/we are ! :) Ubuntu studio is one of the (last and >>> best) audio/vidéo/photo distro for linux. stopped projects: >>> Agnula, fervent softwate studio to go, 64studio, outdated: >>> Kxstudio strange: Avlinux Librazik: cannot install librazik on >>> my computers maybe it's me but seems install is broken Planet >>> CCRMA I don't know if it's still on alive, tango studio, stopped >>> etc. >>> >>> 16.0.4.4 LTS is really great, 18.04 preview is good too. Noticed >>> only few bugs with 18.04 lts. I'm no dev but I can help with bug >>> report if needed I took a lot of photos of my country several >>> years ago, I needed I can give them for screensavers or themes. >>> (Must find them lol they are on an old DVD) >>> >>> Linux world need almost ONE distro for creation. But when I take >>> a look to twitter/google+ US accounts, the ... last messages >>> sent by Ubuntu Studio are very old ( summer 2016) So you/we >>> cannot expect new users. >>> >>> regards >> >> >> -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list >> ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe >> at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel > > -- Set Sakrecoer -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Where to start?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2017-05-14 16:15, Set Hallstrom wrote: > the 10th release ehm... i mean the 10th anniversary... - -- sakrecoer -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJZGGfPAAoJEONx2JZdFePL++IP/jnIkptQgVDEDZYVXZUDR64+ PxOvbVLQfJPGQBJV9B1N/zNAP3UPJhqPrA/6oBiz17T268CYXxS8j1HENepQQe5r THWcrYhpPTNWyjAyj77avMcdTKw5CjvvKOxJOFNgfQ15O0RBPTGqwp1wxvq2wx6Z Oj5NPmx05mlT7hqGtiWYDPWzZHt81Y5H0+nBby+JmTZ3UoqnLvsTVWef0xc36xOg QoJGRkA4uUsb0qeSuZxJVy/MnOBV4FjJXENuD4ZkHiJ+fPXxel9KHejGGWN8lJKe FhBS5EOb+26jpxlhy17Ry4vKB3qPwuKAgtUDn2bCABPEc/dJ867VetFUn8OVnuej LI7hSetpUKV8OY0ylcrRYmqs2uvyHO8wAf2qV7VwrUpeLc5mvNRr0Q+UMG25Itkn ET44ku6KRdftGRYaRUuuUC2AXDaEkSTYMsUZkbsIPAQxi9q4thiCb4StxUTUIRau fvTldp3UQ7fcS2P58kZs2zcSZABJMF6N9mQ32fHvRT7730OGTjmGdu2nNVDSgop3 Utc4U8iQizJkgflLE3G9dVi9sqo/7d/MAqASMDCBCMbcBCfNzXg4p53VyOqLiPbg Msll2e9808AZs6E5AdvT9+6qL6Dna9NqbX0VwNbuCOQb8d69Q7YFx3S5jM2OcKQ4 4SDyze5BfwDTk8b8Kmgu =wna3 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
[ubuntu-studio-devel] Where to start?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Probably with an apology: A sincere one. Although spontaneously, i'd like to congratulate you all for the 10th release of Ubuntu Studio! You made it without me! <3 As you've all respectfully and silently been able to observe: i cannot lead this project. And I'm probably not going to be in a foreseeable future. I'm sorry for that, among other things. I have very limited amount of time, but i suppose we'd need to talk technicalities with permissions in launchpad and such as soon as possible. Can we meet-up on IRC on the 21st of May? Not sure what time would be the best, but I will follow up on this thread. I can't speak much of the state of things or the community, because i have no idea: My backlog is crumbling, covered in dust and my life doesn't look like it did 8 months ago. I suppose a big thank-you!! to those who pulled the work load of 17.04 is in place. I owe you beers, juices and gratitude. Yours, - -- sakrecoer -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJZGGZzAAoJEONx2JZdFePLDTsP/i4GBfNal0y8Tst0AxMiWAwx kvC8vgYjmtoKFrDat94lMml6LZj3HcMNcEY1J7p3GbcRTfMGOfTgAC1VInSxQLJt 418q/XPzZJhOwomg5bYb/Hqdmy9gVAZ3JMhkAnYUkfjzT3VJmwmxD36m+FYxBHn2 6IXLZstymmHsjefIc4rG5wGSFnxzUkGBz3tyufFygHxih0OZ9asbEuTkVxAZsyNI 0OjKo1rlwoOAJc3TRNxd9GcbIiPu5qg7Z/irgArMGOUT9yyXq8sicZCXGQm+q5t1 vqjyKu8+mLMAYB+WZH+sEmNj7WJSXcjGf/Ctv6j8aV014aBi4f/UHefJ6W0UU3A6 JC24Wioj1JDTbiGxG597bwLlpH85XVK8L/HX1cLDBhDry8c2r1EsC6HmjQ9xBeHd +fzA7DULFJNrXswIB8ycJgwQFDe1K5RP1CIfXB/QnAh6Y+lQJWZb/k0SjW1CkmdX ZSB9lux8gPSFkQsQwgs3+dcAse5yxWlj4N0SH7WHEgtEb9pPxXMNmijoLSkggqjm 1mgsVdWFLBrDInH8Xy4r43Ht/FBuIUtv9JZxWSkcmZD2p8b/ovzjssa02Bqx1aDN +gX2FaVB5zS7qLpI5HEA+fFUwzc/ImiL2vgcTOSu47AyrzIdMyITojcmF8Fe0q2u YYZfKdE7Ti6GPlSVxC73 =x6uO -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Meeting Tuesday, Nov 29 at 19:00 UTC
On 2016-11-27 13:02, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > FWIW Ubuntu meetings that are announced with a link could have an UTC > clock in the upper left corner, if you click the clock, it links to > timeanddate.com . Thanks for your feedback Ralf. How does one put such a a nifty link in a text-mail? Yours, -- Set Sakrecoer -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Art Team! 10th Birthday Wallpaper Contest
BTW On 2016-11-21 08:36, C. F. Howlett wrote: > Zoom in to see the magic. [url filtered] Are these filtered out by the mailing-list, or did you send the mail like that? -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Art Team! 10th Birthday Wallpaper Contest
Thank you very much for setting this up cfhowlett! You rock! Like i said on IRC, i think ttoine and Eylul's feedback is very good and you should take it in account. Then feel free to proceed with sending it out from any and all the channels we have available :) I offer to add something to the contest: We make a devel-team's choice: that is an internal vote of the 3 best submissions. I will sponsor an UbuntuStudio t-shirt as a prize for them. (Given they agree to share their postal-adress/P.O. Box of course) Looking forward to see what comes out of this! -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Meeting Tuesday, Nov 29 at 19:00 UTC
On 2016-11-27 11:41, eylul wrote: > We will be doing a check-in meeting at Tuesday, Nov. 29 at 19:00UTC > (what time is this for me? > <https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Ubuntu+Studio+Meeting=20161129T19=1>) Awesome Eylul! Thanks for sending this out! -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
[ubuntu-studio-devel] Weekly IRC meetings
Hi list! So it seems from the "17.04 cycle" thread that we are all going to be busier than we have been the past cycle. Eylul suggested we set-up regular IRC meeting and i think it is an excellent idea. It would make our lives easier. I wish we could have them on a weekly basis, and if I may express a preference, it would be Sundays evening CET. But i reckon we need to find a common ground... The only times i can absolutely _not_ is weekdays (mon-fri) between 2am and 6pm CET. How about you guys? -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Ubuntu Studio - Yakkety 16.10 Testing
On 2016-10-08 18:47, Ross Gammon wrote: > Hi All, > > So we are less than one week away from the next release of Ubuntu Studio. > > If you have a spare computer that you don't mind breaking (or > overwriting the data on the hard disk), and you would like to help make > the next release a beauty, then get testing! > > The first Release Candidate has just been uploaded: > > http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/368/builds > > There are links to download the DVD images, and how to do the testing on > this page. Don't be afraid to submit bugs on Launchpad and list them in > your results on the tracker. We want to find & fix as many as we can > over the next week. If you need help, just ask on this list, or on IRC. > > Regards, > > Ross > Thank you Ross! :) I bump the thread since it seems we got a re-spin of the ISO today. So lets try it! Happy bug-hunting! :) -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Numix Blue Theme
tisdagen den 4:e oktober 2016 kl. 19:29:35 CEST, Ross Gammon <ro...@ubuntustudio.org> skrev: Done - Laney has sponsored it for us \o/ \o/ <3 On 03/10/16 15:19, Set Hallstrom wrote: Thanks Ross:) I guess Krytarik and I didn't expect the reverts to be necessary Well, I just thought that it was a smaller diff file, and easier for a sponsor to review. We could have tried for the full transition, but there was a risk that they would suggest deferring it until the next release cycle. That makes a lot of sense! Put like that it's a great move :) On the fringes of social-engineering lol! I was thinking /inside/ the box in terms of double-work. I'm told: >>without it (Provides) and the ability to drop -lightdm-theme off the seed/meta >>simultaneously, 1.) the image build would start failing, and 2.) the >>meta would become uninstallable (-desktop, -core). Good point. I didn't think to check the impact on the metapackages. I will add a task to the bug to remember to take care of that. Hopefully we can cover that problem by uploading new metapackages first, but if the builds fail for a while early in the release cycle it shouldn't matter too much. This happens regularly anyway, when Debian do transitions that don't take care of our seeds :-) Awesome! Next cycle, 17.04 is Ubuntu Studio 10 year anniversary so lets make it tidy ! :) Yours, -- Set Hallström Sent from my Ubuntu pocket computer -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Numix Blue Theme
On 2016-10-02 14:49, Ross Gammon wrote: > So, I have reverted the merge of default-settings & lightdm-theme, > uploaded debdiffs to the FFE bug, and tested the theme works using or > devel testing ppa. > Thanks Ross :) I guess Krytarik and I didn't expect the reverts to be necessary, but i take responsibility for failing to better synchronize the team efforts and I add an entry to my "why-i-need-to-learn-more-about-packaging"-list :) Anyways, now everything the -release team asks for is there and i thank you for your time and effort. Hopefully, despite being deprived of an up-loader in the team, now that we know where we stand in that regard we will be able to better anticipate this kind of situation. > Hopefully the Release Team look at it soon. It may pay to ping them > on IRC in the next day or so. I will poke them this afternoon and also try my luck in #u-devel > Later I will submit bugs so that we remember to pull Krytarik's > package merge back in for the next release. Yes, thank you! This reminds me that i need to inform you of the following piece of knowledge I've been given: You wrote in OP: >>> 2. We have updated debian/control to also provide the >>> us-lightdm-theme package. I don't think creating a virtual >>> package is appropriate here. It is probably sufficient to just >>> have breaks/replaces so that us-lightdm-theme is removed on >>> upgrade. I'm told: >> without it (Provides) and the ability to drop -lightdm-theme off the >> seed/meta >> simultaneously, 1.) the image build would start failing, and 2.) the >> meta would become uninstallable (-desktop, -core). I haven't been notified about the bug yet, so I'm assuming its underway, but it might be good to put it there so we remember. Thank you very much Ross, -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Numix Blue Theme
gt; Summary: > > Krytarik has done a good job here (as things certainly were a little > messy before), but at this stage I think we should revert the commit > that moves the config to default-settings, and just upload the changes > to make numix blue the default. Then we should implement the config move > early in the next release cycle to get maximum upgrade testing from > previous releases. > > If there are no mistakes/comments in this analysis (and I could do with > an answer on the xubuntu-icon-theme question above), I will probably > start on this later today/tomorrow. I wish i could be a better judge of what to do, but due to my poor technical understanding i have to leave this up to you and Krytarik. I can imagine that Krytarik is going to be reluctant to redo the changes later, because, well... double work, but i also think he should join this conversation to clarify why it would be unnecessary to revert now so you both can be on the same page regarding what is done and why. I truly hope i'm not making things more complicated with my interaction and that we will be able to find a good solution in time. Yours, -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
[ubuntu-studio-devel] Final push before release.
Hi list, As you probably know, next week is Release Candidate and the week after is the Final release. I am facing 2 major difficulties in timing: - My mom is visiting me from Switzerland during RC - I start working on a new job full-time the day before RC. It should be fine anyways, but i feel i need to inform you since i will not be as available as i would like to. How will it be looking with you guys? Will you be around? Yours, -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Video
On 2016-09-23 08:49, One Chamois wrote: > Hello everyone! > > Here is the third version of the video, as always rendered with 50 samples. > > Are the texts slow enough now? The video is more or less 3 seconds > longer than the last one, but if it is still too fast I will change it. > > https://youtu.be/QgBex9DwUVY > > Best regards > > Awesome! Its really great! Thank you for being so open to feedback and for your efforts. On thing just hit me, under "photo" you include "Shotwell", we do not distribute that anymore, but you could add "RawTherapee" instead and 2 make it 3, add "phatch" :) In audio, i would add JACK... also just to make it 3 like in most other categories. Big up One Chamois! You rock! -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] 16.10 Final Beta
fredagen den 16:e september 2016 kl. 13:14:39 CEST, Ross Gammonskrev: Just a quick note that I will be travelling due to work next week, and I won't be around for the final Beta release which I think is on Thursday. Are there others around to help with the testing of the ISO and let the Release Team know when it is ready? Regards, Ross I will be arround :) i can't coordinate for all flavours like last time because i'll have some homework for job applications to do... but i believe i have the necessary access to mark the ISOs ready. Wish you a safe travel and look forward to read you again! :) Yours, -- Set Hallström Sent from my Ubuntu pocket computer -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Video
söndagen den 18:e september 2016 kl. 11:09:15 CEST, Jonathan Aquilinaskrev: Did not mean to derail the thread, I did leave it be and the funny thing this is outlook 2016 on an office 365 subscription. Email provider is me myself and I on my own server setup. Anyway no harm no foul and sorry for the noise. no worries. It's always better to be safe than sorry anyways :) Yours, -- Set Hallström Sent from my Ubuntu pocket computer -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Video
From: ubuntu-studio-devel-boun...@lists.ubuntu.com [mailto:ubuntu-studio-devel-boun...@lists.ubuntu.com] On Behalf Of One Chamois Sent: 18 September 2016 09:33 To: ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Subject: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Video Hello everyone! I'm sending you the second version of the video. As the first version, this video is rendered with 50 samples. https://youtu.be/QZaXJIk6kQU Best regards This is great!!! \o/ thank you very much!!! i can probably suck it down from youtube, i'd very much like to serve the file from archive.org or our own server if we embedd it on the website. Let me know if you want me to render it for you. :) söndagen den 18:e september 2016 kl. 09:37:20 CEST, Jonathan Aquilinaskrev: This is odd, The attachment is a .sql file. Im suspecting spam here. i see no attachement, but a link. This is defenitly not spam. Maybe something with how your client interpretates mails in different formats? Ask your mail provider maybe? I don't know, but i would just let that file be if i was you. Yours, -- Set Hallström Sent from my Ubuntu pocket computer -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] A bit of story and promotion
On 2016-09-14 17:57, ttoine wrote: > Guys, > > Just to let you know, we will have a bit of promotion this fall from > http://opensource.com (FYI, operated by Red Hat). > > My first article has been published today: > https://opensource.com/life/16/9/my-linux-story-musician > Awesome, Merci Antoine! :) Nice article also! I was glad to read a mention to framasoft. I got in touch with them when i co-organized RMLL (LSM) in Geneva 2012. I really like that community, and i wish every language had an equivalent. Yours, -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Video
söndagen den 11:e september 2016 kl. lördagen den 10:e september 2016 kl. 21:03:49 CEST, One Chamoisskrev: Hello everyone! https://youtu.be/_Q2qA6JZl8g one thing that hits me now, is that the logo is wrong and also the woodmark. its important that you use the correct ones available here: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntustudio-art/ubuntustudio-artwork/current-standard/files sorry, i could have pointed you to that earlier, but i wasn't aware you had already started. if rendertime is an issue for you, you can send me the blendfile and i'll render it for you :) -- Set Hallström Sent from my Ubuntu pocket computer -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Video
lördagen den 10:e september 2016 kl. 21:03:49 CEST, One Chamoisskrev: Hello everyone! https://youtu.be/_Q2qA6JZl8g holy kazo! wow! ... WOW! short, precise, good looking and loopable! i'm in awe, so my spontaneous reaction is 'awesome'! :) <3 -- Set Hallström Sent from my Ubuntu pocket computer -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Website
Hi! First of, thanks to everyone who's been involved with this! It looks promissing so far and i remain optimistic that we will be able to have it ready before 16.10 release! tisdagen den 16:e augusti 2016 kl. 22:29:51 CEST, eylulskrev: Hi! So, the bulk of the website is done, and it would be great to deploy it before we have to focus on the release. This gives us until the end of September or so. Good, i thought i was overdue that date. This sounds realistic :) Below is an overview of what needs done. Feel free to add to this. TODO BEFORE DEPLOY: * We need the links/licenses on stock images used in creation of the background images, before we can put the site up. Even if these are CC-0, it is best to have that information stored somewhere. If they are other forms of creative commons, depending on the license we might need to credit them. Yes this is very important! For the record, Geirdal seems too busy, but we have backup material :) The keyboard photo belongs to Set. Geirdal could you give us links to the rest of stock photos you used, so that we have a record of that information? CONTENT REVIEW: A good portion of the content of the website has either been substantially edited, or written from scratch. Here is a list of all static pages, with some notes where extra scrutiny is especially needed. Could we commit to finish this review by end of August? ah... well seems not, lol! 0) General: * is the footer correct? looks good, though, i would suggest leaving creds to knome for the theme as is, but link to a textfile containing credits for the rest of the material instead of potentially having a miles long footer-text with zillions of links. * is the menu correct? * are we missing any critical pages or content before putting up the site? I would say a FAQ..(could be contained in Support maybe?) but i'm not too sure about what the FAQs are, except for the security disclaimer we discussed earlier this summer and perhaps some reccurent PAVU with JACK questions, the 'can i use US to create commercial work' etc... we could probably fill it up along peu à peu.. 1) Front page: http://www.ubuntustudio.zequence.net/ * is "downloads" link working? * are social media accounts correct? looks correct to me. on desktop, the gap between the first container and the feature tour is quite big and i fear the FT might go unnoticed. Could we either make the gap smaller or have a button in the first container or in the menu with an anchor link that 'scrolls' down to the FT? * feature tour and general information had a few eyes on it already, but it wouldn't hurt to review. 2) Downloads: http://www.ubuntustudio.zequence.net/downloads/ * are links working? (especially the ones to 16.04). looks ok, but i would like to try again on a desktop (reviewing from my phone can't test magnet links) * the text is copy pasted and reformatted from the current site, but it can use a quick review. 3) Support: http://www.ubuntustudio.zequence.net/support/ You guys made a great job here, eylul and krytarik \o/ its friendly and professional. i would like to add links to scribus wiki and inkscape forum. I'll provide you that next week unless you get there before ;) Contribute: http://www.ubuntustudio.zequence.net/contribute/ Same as support, my 8 thumbs up for the text! i hear the ubuntu facebook group is helpfull, perhaps put a link to that for those affraid of IRC? ( yes, that came from me :D ) * double checking of outside links, especially making sure webchat and mailing list links work. * these two went through some reviewing already but there are also new content. Thus, it wouldn't hurt to check. &=(^^,)<--- me with one of my thumbs up, the other 7 don't fit in the frame. 4) Merchandise: http://www.ubuntustudio.zequence.net/merchandise/ * is the "legal" section information correct? * any other missing/incorrect information? looks good to me, perhaps ttoine can chip in here? i'll poke him if he doesn't see this mail. :) PLUGIN AND THEME * From what I understand, we do need to have the Live Compositor plugin and the child theme uploaded to the main site, before we can move the content. i think i need to file a RT ticket for that, will take care of it next week... shouldn't be a problem (fingers crossed, touching wood) Thanks :) Best, eylul Thank you for your drive with this eylul, it looks very promissing!! \o/ -- Set Hallström Sent from my Ubuntu pocket computer -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Image copyright information and website
On 2016-09-05 16:11, Set Hallstrom wrote: > very jagetty to me... I mean, very pixelated, lo-fi... :) sorry -- Set Sakrecoer -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Image copyright information and website
On 2016-09-05 13:26, eylul wrote: > Hi Geirdal, > > I know you are busy :), but could you give us the attribution links for > the photographs and other 3rd party resources you used to create the > website background images, sometime this week? Even if they are public > domain, it would be best to have the record of that somewhere, and if > they are creative commons, we need to be able to attribute them. Also, we need this picture in higher resolution: http://www.ubuntustudio.zequence.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/graphic_03.png I suspect its the butched out versions i did with heavy cropping? Looks very jagetty to me... > > Also would everybody have any objections to getting the new site moving > out of stage to ubuntustudio.org, sometime before the end of this week? > That sounds like a plan. :) Would that be a good time frame for you Geirdal? :) -- Set Sakrecoer -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Important: Ubuntu/Debian Security Hole
On 2016-08-30 22:31, Yoshi wrote: > security hole in the > "Ubuntu/Debian update mechanism" involving authentication and > signatures Got to be reffering to this: https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2016/08/powerful_bit-fl.html "breaking OpenSSH public-key authentication, and forging GPG signatures from trusted keys" Sounds like hard times for security experts and the web of trust. :( -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Yakkety Yak Beta 1 Released
"The Jogpa, in our mad flight, cut off a long lock of the yak's silky hair. Having secured this, he appeared to be quite satisfied, let go, and sheathed his sword." ― Arnold Henry Savage Landor The first beta of the Yakkety Yak (to become 16.10) has now been released! This milestone features images for Kubuntu, Lubuntu, Ubuntu GNOME, Ubuntu Kylin, Ubuntu MATE, Ubuntu Studio. Pre-releases of the Yakkety Yak are *not* encouraged for anyone needing a stable system or anyone who is not comfortable running into occasional, even frequent breakage. They are, however, recommended for Ubuntu flavor developers and those who want to help in testing, reporting and fixing bugs as we work towards getting this bos grunniens ready. Beta 1 includes a number of software updates that are ready for wider testing. These images are still under development, so you should expect some bugs. While these Beta 1 images have been tested and work, except as noted in the release notes, Ubuntu developers are continuing to improve the Yakkety Yak. In particular, once newer daily images are available, system installation bugs identified in the Beta 1 installer should be verified against the current daily image before being reported in Launchpad. Using an obsolete image to re-report bugs that have already been fixed wastes your time and the time of developers who are busy trying to make 16.10 the best Ubuntu release yet. Always ensure your system is up to date before reporting bugs. Lubuntu: Lubuntu is a flavor of Ubuntu based on LXDE and focused on providing a very lightweight distribution. The Lubuntu 16.10 Beta 1 images can be downloaded from: * http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/lubuntu/releases/yakkety/beta-1/ More information about Lubuntu 16.10 Beta 1 can be found here: * https://wiki.ubuntu.com/YakketyYak/Beta1/Lubuntu Ubuntu GNOME: Ubuntu GNOME is a flavour of Ubuntu featuring the GNOME desktop environment. The Ubuntu GNOME 16.10 Beta 1 images can be downloaded from * http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-gnome/releases/yakkety/beta-1/ More information about Ubuntu GNOME 16.10 Beta 1 can be found here: * https://wiki.ubuntu.com/YakketyYak/Beta1/UbuntuGNOME Ubuntu Kylin: Ubuntu Kylin is a flavour of Ubuntu that is more suitable for Chinese users. The Ubuntu Kylin 16.10 Beta 1 images can be downloaded from: * http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntukylin/releases/yakkety/beta-1/ More information about Ubuntu Kylin 16.10 Beta 1 can be found here: * https://wiki.ubuntu.com/YakketyYak/Beta1/UbuntuKylin Ubuntu MATE: Ubuntu MATE is a flavour of Ubuntu featuring the MATE desktop environment for people who just want to get stuff done. The Ubuntu MATE 16.10 Beta 1 images can be downloaded from: * http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-mate/releases/yakkety/beta-1/ More information about Ubuntu MATE 16.10 Beta 1 can be found here: * https://wiki.ubuntu.com/YakketyYak/Beta1/UbuntuMATE Ubuntu Studio: Ubuntu Studio is a flavour of Ubuntu configured for multimedia production. The Ubuntu Studio 16.10 Beta 1 images can be downloaded from: * http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntustudio/releases/yakkety/beta-1/ More information about Ubuntu Studio 16.10 Beta 1 can be found here: * https://wiki.ubuntu.com/YakketyYak/Beta1/UbuntuStudio If you're interested in following the changes as we further develop the Yakkety Yak, we suggest that you subscribe to the ubuntu-devel-announce list. This is a low-traffic list (a few posts a month) carrying announcements of approved specifications, policy changes, beta releases and other interesting events. * http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-announce A big thank you to the developers and testers for their efforts to pull together this Beta release! In addition, we would like to wish Linux a happy 25th birthday! On behalf of the Ubuntu Release Team, Set Hallstrom and Simon Quigley signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-devel-announce mailing list ubuntu-devel-announce@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-announce
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Testing - Ubuntu Studio Yakkety 16.10 coming soon!
Looks like we had a re-spin 30 minutes ago. The good news is that it built OK and that it is in the tracker :) -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Testing - Ubuntu Studio Yakkety 16.10 coming soon!
Finally, the ISO built!! \o/ http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/360/builds The tracker needs a little moment to refresh, so if you open the page and you see the version of the Ubuntu Studio ISO is 20160818 it means you have to wait jst a little more. :) If you are new to this, you will find Ross's excellent explanations on how to proceed here bellow. Yours, Set On 2016-08-21 17:37, Ross Gammon wrote: > Hi All, > > We are just coming up to the busy period now, on the approach to the > release of Ubuntu Studio Yakkety. > > So if you would like to help out, please dust off that old PC you have > laying about, or that spare external disk, and download the latest daily > Yakkety ISO so that you are ready to go when the time comes. > > I am told that the latest ISO is not working, but it is still a good > idea to download it, and then you can use zsync to update to the latest > ISO (instead of a complete new download) once it is successfully > rebuilt. The latest Yakkety dailies can be found here: > http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/360/builds > Click on either the amd64 link, or the i386 one, for Ubuntu Studio. > There you will find three installation Test Cases, and a link to the > download information. > > Sing out on the "-devel" list or IRC if you need help. > > Note: Please don't install anything on a machine with stuff you don't > want to lose! We don't want any tears. > > Thursday August 25th - Yakkety Beta 1 > - > > In the days leading up to the Beta 1 release, a link for "Yakkety Beta > 1" will appear on this page: > http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker > This is the time to zsync to the latest ISO, and begin running the 3 > installation tests, and reporting your findings, good or bad. Don't be > scared to file a bug. They can always be closed. > > Be aware that if serious bugs are found, there might be a rebuild of the > ISO triggered, and we will have to run the tests again. > > It is important that we have as many testers as possible, and find as > may bugs as possible, so that we have time to try and fix them before > the release in October. > > Application Testing > --- > > In addition to the installation tests above, we also need to > continuously test our main Ubuntu Studio applications. Once you have a > working Yakkety development release installation, go to our package > tracker and run a few of our 20 manual test cases: > http://packages.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/361/builds/117793/testcases > > These test cases just give you the steps to gently check that the > applications still run without crashing. If you know the program, you > are of course welcome to "kick the tyres" a bit harder! > > End > --- > > Thanks for reading this far :-) > > Please get stuck into the testing and help make Yakkety a great release. > If you would like some personal satisfaction along the way, see if you > can become a top tester: > http://packages.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/reports/testers > > Regards, > > Ross Gammon > > -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] FW: LiveFS ubuntustudio/yakkety/i386 failed tobuild on 20160824
On 2016-08-24 13:06, Set Hallstrom wrote: > On 2016-08-24 09:19, Set Hallstrom wrote: >> On 2016-08-24 08:35, Ross Gammon wrote: >>> The ubuntustudio-meta update that fixes this is stuck in >>> yskkety-proposed. If anyone is on IRC today, could you ask on -release >>> for it to Be inblocked? >> >> on it :) >> > Ok... after a long wait, for things to update and what not, i just > trigger the rebuild > > Touch wood, keep fingers crossed, and all that jazz :D > nd we have an ISO! \o/ -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] FW: LiveFS ubuntustudio/yakkety/i386 failed tobuild on 20160824
On 2016-08-24 09:19, Set Hallstrom wrote: > On 2016-08-24 08:35, Ross Gammon wrote: >> The ubuntustudio-meta update that fixes this is stuck in >> yskkety-proposed. If anyone is on IRC today, could you ask on -release >> for it to Be inblocked? > > on it :) > Ok... after a long wait, for things to update and what not, i just trigger the rebuild Touch wood, keep fingers crossed, and all that jazz :D -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] FW: LiveFS ubuntustudio/yakkety/i386 failed tobuild on 20160824
On 2016-08-24 08:35, Ross Gammon wrote: > The ubuntustudio-meta update that fixes this is stuck in > yskkety-proposed. If anyone is on IRC today, could you ask on -release > for it to Be inblocked? on it :) -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] support for wine-rt out-of-box?
Hi Hank! On 2016-08-19 08:47, Hank Stanglow wrote: > Hello, I am a Web Developer, Artist, Musician, and long time user of > Ubuntu Studio. You guys do a great job! This distribution gives me the > best out-of-box experience for Web Development and I find the Art and > Publishing tools perfectly adequate for my needs. Thank you for reaching out with your input in such an uplifting tone! > Music and Video? Not > so much, but this a problem for all Linux distributions. In fact, after > seven years of fumbling with the JACK/ALSA/Pulse nightmare I've given up > using native tools and now use WINE exclusively for audio work. Even KX > Studio has more problems than I care to deal with and the only thing I > take from its repos is wine-rt. If I were to make ONE suggestion for > Ubuntu Studio it would be to have a super stable, low-latency WINE-rt > environment for audio users (or good instructions on how to set one up). I agree that the state of Linux in terms of Music is tougher than mainstream OS. Since i mainly record hardware electronics, it isn't much of an issue for me personally. But lately I've grown pretty fond of qtractor for ITB (In The Box) production with midi controlled Software synthesizers. I have yet to finish a song to prove my point, but while it is a little wilder than i remember ITB production from other OS'es, it actually works :) For video editing i always have to point towards blender's VSE which has become pretty awesome if one has got the time to get familiar with its GUI. I'm not 100% sure, but i think wine isn't distributed because of the license. However, your idea of creating good instruction on how to set it up is an excellent one. In fact, we really need help with documentation. If you have any spare time to share, you are welcome to join the ubuntustudio-documentation team. Maybe pass by our IRC channel sometime on freenode #ubuntustudio-devel and say hi?:) > > That said, I am currently NOT using Ubuntu Studio as of 16.04. This is > because of one reason only, that is, too many bugs in Thunar. I know > could install a different tool (pcmanfm is great), but the file manager > is an integral part of a system and I really love Thunar above others. I > also know this has nothing to do with Ubuntu Studio. I hope the > XFCE/Thunar team can quickly fix their wonderful DE. As soon as they do > I will be back with Ubuntu Studio. In the meantime I am using Ubuntu > MATE, which is pretty good! Has you ever considered a MATE version? > Though I imagine it would be impractical to support two desktop > environments... Sorry to read your issues with Thunar. I'm aware there is a problem, but i haven't yet had to suffer it. *touching wood*. At this point, we don't really have any plans to move to MATE, but we've had an ambition floating for long now, to make Ubuntu Studio desktop agnostic. The main concern in that aspect is that the team is very small ATM. Hence i allow myself to insist again, that you are welcome to join the team and help us make things like this become reality. :) > > Thanks for your hard work and have a super day, > Hank > Thank you for your uplifting email! I hope we will hear from you soon again! Have a great weekend! -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] 16.10 Beta 1 Freeze
On 2016-08-20 11:28, Ross Gammon wrote: > I think that flocculant was after a volunteer to manage the > whole Beta release for ALL the flavours. gaahdat misunderstanding... i thought he ment from _our_ flavour and i answered you and me... :( let me correct that... -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] 16.10 Beta 1 Freeze
lördagen den 20:e augusti 2016 kl. 11:01:47 CEST, Kaj Ailomaa <zeque...@mousike.me> skrev: On Sat, Aug 20, 2016, at 10:53 AM, Set Hallstrom wrote: tisdagen den 16:e augusti 2016 kl. 22:55:37 CEST, Set Hallstrom <s...@ubuntustudio.org> skrev: > > Ok, thanks guys! I'll let the release team know we are in. > Regarding the theme changes, if i understood Kaj correctly on IRC today, > we have until UI freeze on September 8th to land them... > > Yours, I reached out and i've been asked who is holding it from our side. I assumed Ross would, but the question made me realise he hasn't answered yet and might be too busy, in which case i guess i could do it, unless there are some permissions needed that i don't behold. I'm reading up on the process anyway.. At the moment, this page says Kaj is the contact for it: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/YakketyYak/Beta1 is that correct or copypasta? Yours, Just change that page and put you and Ross on it instead of me - I'm not the contact. Make those links to your LP pages as well. I have made an announcement on the -release list about Ross being our testing lead and also on -devel about you being project lead, but could be someone missed or forgot that. Sooner or later they will remember who is who. Thank you Kaj, i'll do that. Just to be clear, my main concern about the contact field was that you would end up being solicitated against your will. :) I'm very thankful that you are still around... -- Set Hallström Sent from my Ubuntu pocket computer -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] 16.10 Beta 1 Freeze
tisdagen den 16:e augusti 2016 kl. 22:55:37 CEST, Set Hallstrom <s...@ubuntustudio.org> skrev: Ok, thanks guys! I'll let the release team know we are in. Regarding the theme changes, if i understood Kaj correctly on IRC today, we have until UI freeze on September 8th to land them... Yours, I reached out and i've been asked who is holding it from our side. I assumed Ross would, but the question made me realise he hasn't answered yet and might be too busy, in which case i guess i could do it, unless there are some permissions needed that i don't behold. I'm reading up on the process anyway.. At the moment, this page says Kaj is the contact for it: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/YakketyYak/Beta1 is that correct or copypasta? Yours, -- Set Hallström Sent from my Ubuntu pocket computer -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] 16.10 Beta 1 Freeze
On 2016-08-16 20:31, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > It's a good time to do a first evaluation of the state of the distro. It > is just after Debian import freeze, and an excellent chance to test the > Debian imported packages so there is time to catch and fix any obvious > bugs. So, yes from me. > > On 2016-08-16 20:36, Len Ovens wrote: >> It seems all our seeds changes are in, so I would say yes. This assumes >> you can still make the theme changes after such a freeze > Ok, thanks guys! I'll let the release team know we are in. Regarding the theme changes, if i understood Kaj correctly on IRC today, we have until UI freeze on September 8th to land them... Yours, -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Website
Thanks Eylul! Awesome! I'll go through all the points asap. On 2016-08-16 22:29, eylul wrote: > > The keyboard photo belongs to Set. For the record, the license is CC-BY :) Yours, -- Set Sakrecoer -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
[ubuntu-studio-devel] 16.10 Beta 1 Freeze
Hi all, Do we want to participate in Beta 1 Freeze next week? Beta 1 Freeze (Monday), and Beta 1 release on Thursday... https://wiki.ubuntu.com/YakketyYak/ReleaseSchedule Yours, -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
[ubuntu-studio-devel] Ardour 5 just landed in debian
Hi, Len just announced on IRC that Ardour 5 landed in debian https://packages.qa.debian.org/a/ardour.html Do i read this correctly: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/NewPackages#Requesting_a_new_package_for_Ubuntu if i think it will be synced automatically, since FF and DIF is tomorrow? Do we have time to include it in 16.10? Yours, -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Shimmer and Numix
On 2016-08-16 08:51, Ross Gammon wrote: > The bzr incantation looks OK to me from memory. > > In general, if the work is a little bit experimental, I think it is > better to make a "fiddle" branch locally before starting the > modifications. That branch can then be pushed to your own ppa, or the > team one for review and eventually merging back into trunk. > > But no problems, if you push as Krytarik says, a new branch should > appear on the -dev code page of Launchpad. > > Sorry about the rush. Wanted to reassure you so you can keep moving > (although this will need moderation anyway). > Thank you for taking the time Ross. :) I pushed it to the team, here: https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntustudio-dev/ubuntustudio-look/numix-blue-theme I'm still struggling with the concepts of version-control software *blush*, but i'm not giving up on it! Yours, -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Shimmer and Numix
Hello Ross On 2016-08-10 17:24, Ross Gammon wrote: > Aah, I think I misunderstood the original discussion. I thought it was > about moving to the same theme as xubuntu and tweaking some settings in > the defualt-setting package. No need to package anything. > > Are we sure about this? I thought we could get numix from the > shimmer-themes source package: > https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shimmer-themes > At least the gtk-themes are there. But then, as I wrote before, I have > never really fiddled with themes very much. Yes, we can get it from there, but the highlight color is red. I'm fine with that, but it would be nice if it was blue to fit our color scheme better. :) > Packaging something from scratch and getting it uploaded into either > Debian or Ubuntu (preferably Debian) is not something that will happen > very fast. Probably better to aim for 17.04. > Yes, to get a custom version into Debian and Ubuntu would rather be an aim for 17.04. But i understand we could package it in our own repository, no? > Are you talking about this software?: > https://answers.launchpad.net/~numix/+archive/ubuntu/ppa > And if so, which of the packages are we after. If it is in a ppa, it > does at least have some basic packaging we can start with. Yes, (although, i've never seen a link to launchpad like that before.. X-D ) but the debian source is at a newer version. 2.6.1 > Of course I am happy to mentor Jonathan. I am very patchy with > availability, so it would be better to do it here on the list. Then > others can learn at the same time. Jonathan seems to need to set-up a machine first, i hope he will join-in down the line once he is ready. However, Krytarik and I have been looking into this the past few days. We gathered the source SVGs from upstream to facilitate color-customization https://github.com/numixproject/numix-gtk-theme/issues/508 and successfully made a script to convert the theme's colors and re-render the required PNGs. Krytarik asked me to push the custom theme to lp:ubuntustudio-look/numix-blue-theme so that he could work on the packaging into our repository. But i am stuck by my fear to mess-up the ubuntustudio-look branch with my poor bzr skills. Could you help me Ross? This is what i have done so far: - I pulled the branch with: bzr branch lp:ubuntustudio-look - I pulled the debian source of numix, and edited is as needed to turn everything red into blue. What i am stuck with is really a noob thing: i'm not sure how to push if i want the theme to be a spearate branch... i've been told (i think) by Krytarik that i could do: 'bzr push lp:~ubuntustudio-look/numix-theme-blue' but i am affraid i might have misunderstood Krytarik's instructions and since he is not available atm i'm asking here. The thing is that i don't want the 'usr' and 'po' folders from ubuntustudio-look/trunk to be in ubuntustudio-look/numix-theme-blue... I hope i'm making sense and that we still have the time frame to do this. Yours, -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Feature Freeze & Debian Import Freeze for Yakkety
On 2016-08-11 07:04, Ross Gammon wrote: > On 08/10/2016 07:40 PM, Ross Gammon wrote: >> I will be concentrating on merging our packages that are out of date >> compared to Debian unstable over the next week. If you are game to help >> out with that, there is some information here: >> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/Merging > > Scratch that. > > There were a few packages out of date compared to Debian, but not by > very much, and we are not missing out on any bug fixes. I will keep > still keep an eye out for any new uploads to Debian. > > Hi! Very happy to know you have it in check. :) I am game to learn and i read the wiki, so if something shows up, ping the thread and I'll try my best to join efforts. Yours, -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Hellotux shop
On 2016-08-12 13:13, ttoine wrote: > Something like: Ubuntu Studio, CoF logo and Ubuntu Studio logo are > registered trademarks of Canonical. You can use them following > Canonical Intellectual property rights policy. > > the link: > http://www.ubuntu.com/legal/terms-and-policies/intellectual-property-policy#your-use-of-our-trademarks > > I think this should be enough. And if Canonical needs more, they will > contact us (they contact me from time to time for this kind of > stuff) Thank you! :) > my aim was just to make it clear who I am, my background, my > opinions. It's so difficult to come through the way one wishes in text alone. After all, even with lots of formulation efforts to stay inclusive and neutral, our written words resonate in someone else's head, along with their own emotions, their own current states of mind, withing the boundaries of their culture, in the voice of their choice, far beyond the emitters control. Something i constantly need to remind myself of... Anyways i am very glad you did that introduction of yourself, better there and then, than never :) Like i wrote: i find your dedication and expertise admirable and it is good to know you are around. Yours, -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Hellotux shop
On 2016-08-12 11:28, ttoine wrote: > Set, thanks a lot for your answer. I think that instead having this > ressource on Launchpad, we should have a page on our website, like > this: https://eclipse.org/artwork/ With all the ressources available > to download. And a disclaimer, telling what you can do or not do, and > how to contact us. This would make it easier. That is a very good idea! We should make a section like that on the new website. Can you/would you have time to help us formulate the guide-lines / disclaimer? I think you are the most knowledgeable member in that regard.. > So, even with Set clarification about Ralf's tone, I will take time > to answer to him, because I would like things to be transparents. I have to say, i'm personally very interested in your work and also glad to learn more about your history in Ubuntu Studio, your investments. The more i get to know about you, the more i admire you Antoine. If i could wish something, it would be that i would have gotten to know these details in a more... positive context. I don't know much about Ralf contribution to FLOSS at large, but i can back my claim that despite his harsh tone, he has helped many users solve their problems. At the end of the day, his contribution on the user-list is mostely very precious. I know i might sound out of my league due to that recent flame-thread i was a partialy responsible of, but if it teached me something it is that we are not here to rank each others benevolent participation. Please continue the discussion off-list if you have to and stay kind to each other. Yours, -- Set Sakrecoer -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Hellotux shop
Hi guys, Thank you ttoine, for being as transparent as you can, it is highly appreciated. I fear It does look like they might be using the malformed CoF and the woodmark does appear to be different from the official one. You will find the appropriate source-files here: https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntustudio-art/ubuntustudio-artwork/current-standard Thank you Thomas for being concerned about the visual-identity and thoroughly checking the details. However, AFAIK the CoF is ok to use on a white background, as you will see in the branch above. Finally thank you Ralf for pointing out the responsibility that comes with endorsement. While i do _not_ think that a license in purity is required to address social/environmental/ethical issues, i think there are ways to address these issues that are better than others. My personal relation to you, Ralf, allows me to see through your currently very unpleasant tone and mentally "hear" your fundamentally good intentions, but i cringe a bit when i put myself in the shoes of other people reading you. I cannot speak for ttoine, but i think he means "ubuntustudio devel-team" when he says "we" in this context. I know you don't see yourself as a part of this team, Ralf, but as long as you will participate in discussions here, you become a team-member in the eye of the list-readers. If you want to continue to discuss things here with us, i kindly ask you to use a different, less absolute approach and to mind your tone. Yours, humbly pleading guilty to imperfection, -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Shimmer and Numix
söndagen den 7:e augusti 2016 kl. 13:23:40 CEST, Jonathan Aquilinaskrev: I will try and get a vm running and so I can try things out that is if you want me to take charge and contribute :) You are very welcome to contribute :) Drop by the IRC channel #ubuntustudio-devel on freenode sometime and have a chat with us (if you aren't already there). If it's quiet it just means everyone is sleeping (majority of the group is in Europe) or busy elsewhere at that moment :) Yours, -- Set Hallström Sent from my Ubuntu pocket computer -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Shimmer and Numix
lol, my bad. my settings in the mailing list doesn't send me copies if i'm already among the recipients, and my mobil client requires a click to show the full recipient list :D let me add i was very happy to find your email this morning :) it would be so awesome to have a customized theme! Krytarik suggested we look into how to package it for debian, so that more distros can benefit from it. What do you guys think? Ross, could you help/guide Jonathan on this one? Yours, Set -- Set Hallström Sent from my Ubuntu pocket computer -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Shimmer and Numix
Hi Jonathan, Basically it consists in always making sure that our modified branch stays consistent with the changes made upstream. I'm told that is in a few steps basically, just 1.) pull the source somehow, 2.) install the build depends, 3.) 'sed' the thing, to replace the colors 4.) run 'make' in its top directory. I understand it can be challenging and intimidating to answer to the list, but i would prefer if you asked via that chanel in the future. It doesn't bother me that you adress me in private, on the contrary: i feel honored. What i'm thinking is that often times the group has better answers than me alone and other devels night benefit from your questions and the answers it generates :) Its just a matter of transparency: motivation is contagious ;) have nice sunday! yours, Sakrecoer lördagen den 6:e augusti 2016 kl. 23:14:55 CEST, Jonathan Aquilina <jaquil...@eagleeyet.net> skrev: Hi Set, Can you advise what it will contain to help maintain a UStudio branch of numix? On 2016-08-06 23:13, Set Hallstrom wrote: On 2016-08-05 21:47, Ross Gammon wrote: I saw it :-) I have always been very boring, and just got on with what ever default theme was given to me by my distro. So I generally don't have much of an opinion in this area. So - a go for it from me. The less delta we have from xubuntu, the easier it is to get help from those guys. Cheers, Ross Thanks Ross :) It seems that changing the highlight color of Numix to our blue is a harder task than expected and would imply maintaining our own branch of it. Not sure we have anyone who is up for that. In short: Numix would work /if/ we can live with red highlight color? Then again, non of the existing ready made options i know of fit the Ubuntu Studio color scheme fully. Anyone else want to have a say or have ideas? Or better: maybe someone wants to maintain a Numix UbuntuStudioBlue theme for us? :) Let's think about it until Wednesday 10th august ;) -- Set Hallström Sent from my Ubuntu pocket computer -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Shimmer and Numix (was: unmet dependencies)
On 2016-08-05 21:47, Ross Gammon wrote: > I saw it :-) > > I have always been very boring, and just got on with what ever default > theme was given to me by my distro. So I generally don't have much of an > opinion in this area. > > So - a go for it from me. The less delta we have from xubuntu, the > easier it is to get help from those guys. > > Cheers, > > Ross Thanks Ross :) It seems that changing the highlight color of Numix to our blue is a harder task than expected and would imply maintaining our own branch of it. Not sure we have anyone who is up for that. In short: Numix would work /if/ we can live with red highlight color? Then again, non of the existing ready made options i know of fit the Ubuntu Studio color scheme fully. Anyone else want to have a say or have ideas? Or better: maybe someone wants to maintain a Numix UbuntuStudioBlue theme for us? :) Let's think about it until Wednesday 10th august ;) -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
[ubuntu-studio-devel] Shimmer and Numix (was: unmet dependencies)
Hi all, Bellow i paste this email i sent Thu, 28 Jul 2016 to ask you for your opinion. It got nested in another thread, so i break it lose to make sure everyone sees it. ( https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-studio-devel/2016-July/007973.html ) Since feature freeze is around the corner, if no one objects before Sunday 7th august, i will proceed and do the changes from greybird to numix as default theme with ubuntu studio blue as highligt color, and switch from murrine to shimmer as xubuntu have done. Yours, Set Forwarded Message Subject: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Shimmer and numix (was: unmet dependencies) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 13:48:33 +0200 From: Set Hallstrom <s...@ubuntustudio.org> Reply-To: Ubuntu Studio Development <ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com> Organization: Ubuntu Studio To: ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com [snip] I've been looking into the theme thing with krytarik. As is now, we ship ubuntu studio with greybird as default theme. Last time we discussed the theme/look of the desktop, i want to remember many of us agreed on finding a darker theme. http://packages.ubuntu.com/yakkety/murrine-themes http://packages.ubuntu.com/yakkety/shimmer-themes Both Murrine and Shimmer have greybird (our default theme atm). But shimmer is shipped with Numix. And Numix is a pretty excellent theme. The cons as i see them for Numix are these: - The way focused windows differentiate themselves from other (same as greybird) - The very thin window border makes it hard to catch the corners to resize (same as gryebird) The pros: - It hear it is well maintained, like gerybird. - While it is dark, unlike most dark-themes you never get problems with webpage searchboxes displaying white text on white background. The default highlight color of numix is red, but krytarik found a fix from xubuntu unicorn to address this and let us have ubuntustudio blue instead. So, if i sound like i am pushing for a shift from murrine to shimmer and for shipping 16.10 with numix as default theme and window header, you got me alright. :D But of course, we need to agree on it first. What are your thoughts, team? Yours, -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Trusty .5 release
On 2016-08-04 16:30, Ross Gammon wrote: > One of my early open source mentors says often: > "The great thing about open source is that you go to bed with a problem > that needs fixing (or work still to do), and find in the morning that > someone fixed it for you" > :) > Thanks to Kaj, Stefan Bader & Andy Whitcroft, I have just come home to > discover that the Ubuntu Studio Trusy 14.04.5 ISOs have been tested and > marked as ready. Thanks guys! Yes, thank you guys! I have to admit i was guilt-tripping myself a lot for not being able to participate and reminding everyone so late. So I sent a launchpad pm to Stefan Bader and Andy Whitcroft to thank them and to endorse responsibility for the poor participation. I am very happy you guys made it, including you Ross; even if it seems the final RC came too late for you to try it, you were there doing your best. Yours, -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Hellotux shop
torsdagen den 4:e augusti 2016 kl. 15:32:36 CEST, ttoineskrev: Set, Yes, when this is available, a blog/Facebook post would be great. Cool! keep us posted and we'll sort it out with cfhowlett :) About my "activism", I was thinking it could be could to let the team know what I am doing now and why I am less active. Anyway, I am still around :-) It is very nice of you to share, indeed. :) I'm sure many in the group would like to teach FLOSS multimedia in a University, i certainly would. Just knowing it is possible is mighty motivating :) Yours, -- Set Hallström Sent from my Ubuntu pocket computer -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Hellotux shop
torsdagen den 4:e augusti 2016 kl. 13:51:56 CEST, ttoineskrev: @Len, I already have the permission, yes. But it is important for me to ask you: I am not alone to be involved with Ubuntu Studio. And thank you for that :) And btw, I also know that my contributions are less visible: I teach how to use open source software to produce audio and video at the University in my area, I run my small music label with Ubuntu and Mixbus or Ardour. And most important, I work for open source editors since 2013, and now for the Eclipse Foundation. As my job is to work for the promotion of open source, I like to do something else in my hobbies ;-) Awesome and understandable. Just to be safe, i want to insist that i was not questioning your activism, simply stating the fact that i'm happy to read you. :) I will let hellotux know that they can do the shirts. Maybe we should announce it on our social media and link to hellotux on the website? Yours, -- Set Hallström Sent from my Ubuntu pocket computer -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Trusty .5 release
onsdagen den 3:e augusti 2016 kl. 17:03:55 CEST, Ross Gammon <ro...@ubuntustudio.org> skrev: On 08/02/2016 10:34 AM, Set Hallstrom wrote: Copy pasta Kaj's mail, with updated link: ISOs and test cases can be found here http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/365/builds If you want to help out, make sure to get yourself a https://launchpad.net account, login, and then follow instructions on the link above for testing and reporting results. Also, please report any bugs you find. There may be rebuilds until Thursday, so we may need to redo tests a few times, but consider each ISO a release candidate from now on. I am around tonight to spin up the ISO's. I might be a bit slow though, as I am not prepared. If anyone else is around and needs help to join in the testing. Just look for someone (me) on IRC. Thank you very much Ross! Sorry i can't be there to help you... It seems there was a respin of the ISOs a few hours ago... i paste the message sent to ubuntu-release mailing list in case you didn't see it.. onsdagen den 3:e augusti 2016 kl. 17:23:46 CEST, Adam Conrad <adconrad@u.m> skrev: Due to a fairly critical bug in X, we're respinning all the 14.04.5 ISOs right now. I took the opportunity to also slip in a grub2 fix in the same respin, but otherwise, they should be nearly identical to the previous images. Please test ASAP, as we'd like to release on schedule Thursday. -- Set Hallström Sent from my Ubuntu pocket computer -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Hellotux shop
Bonjour Antoine, onsdagen den 3:e augusti 2016 kl. 16:50:00 CEST, ttoineskrev: Actually, I had a discussion in the past with Canonical and they agree to give me a license to set this kind of merchandising deal with the Ubuntu Studio logo. That is how it was possible to set the spreadshirt shop. Canonical is not nice at all when it comes to brand management, btw. I ment hellotux, but i admit my answer was oddly put. They take great care and I am contacted regularly by their legal department. Good to know! This is something many knew a few years ago in the Ubuntu Studio team, but it seems that many don't know of forget that nowadays ;-) Yes, most ancient members have moved on.. On that note It's good to see you arround! :) I also think this is why hellotux contacted me directly. Good to know i can forward this kind of requests to you if they arrive :) Yours, *set -- Set Hallström Sent from my Ubuntu pocket computer -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Hellotux shop
tisdagen den 2:e augusti 2016 kl. 18:14:11 CEST, Len Ovensskrev: On Tue, 2 Aug 2016, ttoine wrote: Hello guys, I have an inquiry of the Hellotux shop team to have the right to sell shirt with embroidered Ubuntu Studio logo. It is possible with the license I have, if we do not take any profit from it (like Spreadshirt). And if they take the minimum benefit too. https://www.hellotux.com/ They agree with that. So now, I can give them the authorisation, however I would like to have your opinion on that. What do you think? It is no different from a printed T in my opinion. It is just another option for buyers. I don't know how many items get sold now, but these are all one off places so it really doesn't matter. So that would be a yes from me. -- Len Ovens www.ovenwerks.net Afaik, the brand is owned by canonical. It looks like a nice company and i agree with Len. I would however ask hellotux to reach out to canonical to double check with them since i'm not 100% sure our team has any authority to grant commercial use of the branding. *set -- Set Hallström Sent from my Ubuntu pocket computer -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Trusty .5 release (was: Alpha & Beta testing)
Copy pasta Kaj's mail, with updated link: ISOs and test cases can be found here http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/365/builds If you want to help out, make sure to get yourself a https://launchpad.net account, login, and then follow instructions on the link above for testing and reporting results. Also, please report any bugs you find. There may be rebuilds until Thursday, so we may need to redo tests a few times, but consider each ISO a release candidate from now on. -- Set Hallström Sent from my Ubuntu pocket computer -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
[ubuntu-studio-devel] Trusty .5 release (was: Alpha & Beta testing)
tisdagen den 28:e juni 2016 kl. 20:01:17 CEST, Ross Gammonskrev: For practise on ISO testing and releasing :-) we also have: Xenial 16.04.1 point release on 21st July Trusty 14.04.5 point release on 6th August I completely forgot about this one until now, as a mail was posted to ubuntu-release mailing list this morning, summoning flavours to test it. I wont be able to test run it, i'm far from home with no computer at hand... :'( I hope someone in the group is better prepared...? I'll follow this mail up in a few moments, with links to doc about how to test for new-commers and other kind souls who want to help out (typing from phone, bare with me..) Yours, -- Set Hallström Sent from my Ubuntu pocket computer -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Feature tour
Hi WMID, fredagen den 29:e juli 2016 kl. 02:17:46 CEST, WMIDskrev: I like this picture: http://storage6.static.itmages.com/i/16/0729/h_1469751263_9886431_931448cd0b.png I agree, it's beautiful! Geirdal is a great artist, we are lucky to benefit from his output. -- Set Hallström Sent from my Ubuntu pocket computer -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Add and remove packages
söndagen den 31:e juli 2016 kl. 21:03:59 CEST, Ross Gammon <ros...@ubuntu.com> skrev: On 07/29/2016 04:55 PM, Ross Gammon wrote: On 07/28/2016 02:12 PM, Set Hallstrom wrote: I saw Ross added the 2 audio packages to the seeds \o/ And i took care of 2 first entries for graphics. The seed part is actually very easy, once you get a grip on the terminology that is. (seeds? meta? :D) I will try my best to document my progress and compile it for the wiki. The metapackages are a little different compared to normal packages, because there is a special command to run the germination script locally based on the seeds in the other repository, and update the debian/control file. I queried the the process with Kaj offline a while back, with the intention to add it to the wiki. I will try and find the mail and forward it. Or I will do it on the wiki for you to test-drive! I have done better than forward the mail, I have written it up on the wiki. \o/ Seeds (was mostly there, I just finished it off a bit): https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/Seeds Meta Packages (filled in the section already allocated for it): https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/UbuntuStudioPackageMaintenance I am in the process of following the instructions myself, to check them. Then the next time we need to update them, someone else can have a go. Comments/Suggestions welcome. Cheers, Ross Thank you Ross \o/ For the wiki pages and for fixing the seeds! <3 Yours, -- Set Hallström Sent from my Ubuntu pocket computer -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Feature tour (was: Seventh try )
fredagen den 29:e juli 2016 kl. 17:52:35 CEST, Kaj Ailomaa <zeque...@mousike.me> skrev: On Thu, Jul 28, 2016, at 02:33 PM, Set Hallstrom wrote: On 2016-06-23 02:00, Jóhann Örn Geirdal wrote: > Seventh try ;) Hi here is only a base I will ad to it some more but > what do you think about this? > http://geirdal.is/index.php/studio-0 I made a few shots that could work well as complementary pictures to the more abstracto-figurative pictures Geirdal made for the categories. I realize they might not be perfect, but maybe you like the idea? I tried to make one for each category, but i think they all end up having a lot of "audio focus" maybe it is a good thing? You tell me. One sure thing is that the "graphic workflow" one, needs a different on-screen content :D (too "cute, wtf, kindergarten") http://sakrecoer.com/ubuntustudio/featuretour__1.jpg http://sakrecoer.com/ubuntustudio/featuretour__2.jpg http://sakrecoer.com/ubuntustudio/featuretour__3.jpg The more i look at Geirdal pictures, the better i like these: http://geirdal.is/images/studio/audio_x.png http://geirdal.is/images/studio/graphic_03.png http://geirdal.is/images/studio/video_x.png If they are used without the pictograms, like they were intended: as backgrounds for text and screenshots, i think they are perfect! They refer to analogue times with very contemporary elements. I think it emulates what we are quite well: /linux for creative humans/ a digital product made by analogue robots ;) And they are quiet and noisy at the same time, which i find to be a really poetic contrast. I think this one is really beautyfull but it should be used without the logos for the general "about" text in the feature tour (: http://geirdal.is/images/studio/studio_07.png It is risky, but i also find it very cool, fresh and inspiring. 90's fractal with a millennial twist! This afternoon i will try put together what i mean in a collage. I'm convinced that, properly framed on the page, using geirdals pictures could make the sexiest feature tour, ever :) Yours, -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer The only thing I would like to remind of is of the "big picgture", which should be about information. It's easy to become a bit obsessed about the details of a design, but the importance is still around what the whole thing informs. And, what is the information? That is the question that needs to be answered - not only with graphics, but with the whole thing. The current feature tour is old, and should be buried. It should be replaced by something that does the same thing, but better. Better information. Better graphics, but most importantly - better information. Thank you, Kaj! I tried to base the text ( http://sakrecoer.com/ubuntustudio/feature-tour.txt ) and layout as good as i could on your and autumna's wiki page: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/FeatureDefinitions/WebsiteXenial The text (and me) is begging for review and i'd love to read/see what you all think should be corrected both text- and design-wise. I believe it's the typical kindof work that gets super strong from teamwork. After all, speaking to all, takes many. :) Yours, -- Set Hallström Sent from my Ubuntu pocket computer -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
[ubuntu-studio-devel] Feature tour (was: Seventh try )
On 2016-06-23 02:00, Jóhann Örn Geirdal wrote: > Seventh try ;) Hi here is only a base I will ad to it some more but > what do you think about this? > http://geirdal.is/index.php/studio-0 I made a few shots that could work well as complementary pictures to the more abstracto-figurative pictures Geirdal made for the categories. I realize they might not be perfect, but maybe you like the idea? I tried to make one for each category, but i think they all end up having a lot of "audio focus" maybe it is a good thing? You tell me. One sure thing is that the "graphic workflow" one, needs a different on-screen content :D (too "cute, wtf, kindergarten") http://sakrecoer.com/ubuntustudio/featuretour__1.jpg http://sakrecoer.com/ubuntustudio/featuretour__2.jpg http://sakrecoer.com/ubuntustudio/featuretour__3.jpg The more i look at Geirdal pictures, the better i like these: http://geirdal.is/images/studio/audio_x.png http://geirdal.is/images/studio/graphic_03.png http://geirdal.is/images/studio/video_x.png If they are used without the pictograms, like they were intended: as backgrounds for text and screenshots, i think they are perfect! They refer to analogue times with very contemporary elements. I think it emulates what we are quite well: /linux for creative humans/ a digital product made by analogue robots ;) And they are quiet and noisy at the same time, which i find to be a really poetic contrast. I think this one is really beautyfull but it should be used without the logos for the general "about" text in the feature tour (: http://geirdal.is/images/studio/studio_07.png It is risky, but i also find it very cool, fresh and inspiring. 90's fractal with a millennial twist! This afternoon i will try put together what i mean in a collage. I'm convinced that, properly framed on the page, using geirdals pictures could make the sexiest feature tour, ever :) Yours, -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Add and remove packages
On 2016-07-27 21:39, Ross Gammon wrote: > Hi Ralf (and other interested people), > > On 07/25/2016 08:56 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >> On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 15:05:13 +0200, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: >>> Then, also create your PPA to which you will upload your own custom >>> meta. >> >> That's what I once wanted to do, but for me it's rocket science and I >> never found a simple explanation for all steps, IOW there's no demo >> with a real package, a beginner simply could copy, step by step. >> > > It is not rocket science. Even I can manage it :-) > > You will never find a simple explanation for how to package, because > there is more than one way to do it, and the steps to do it vary > depending on what you are working on, and the tools and processes also > change/improve over time. > > If you know your way around the shell, how to compile software from > source, how to apply a patch, how to install packages, how to use a bug > tracker, and what version control means, you can package software for > Ubuntu. You just need to learn some of the Debian/Ubuntu specific tools > and processes. If you miss some of this knowledge, you just need time, > patience and the ability to read and use a search engine! > > My starting points/references: > https://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers (for packaging in Debian) > http://packaging.ubuntu.com/html/index.html (for packaging in Ubuntu) > The Debian Mentors mailing list and IRC channel are excellent for > getting help, and the Ubuntu MOTU team can help with Ubuntu specific > queries. > > The best thing is to find a task that needs doing, and get stuck in. If > you get stuck, someone out there will know what to do, and either help > you, or just do it for you (then you can inspect what they did afterwards). > > You can also ask here at any step of the way. Especially if it is one of > our packages, or our seeds. > > Cheers, > > Ross > Thank you guys! I learned a lot from all you guy's input and like Ross suggests; by getting started things get more tangible. (Also, with the good help of krytarik, it gets fun :) ) And i have to say it would be awesome to see you get your hands dirty with us, Ralf. Knowing your console-fu and you rocketmouse science skills ;) I saw Ross added the 2 audio packages to the seeds \o/ And i took care of 2 first entries for graphics. The seed part is actually very easy, once you get a grip on the terminology that is. (seeds? meta? :D) I will try my best to document my progress and compile it for the wiki. Yours, -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
[ubuntu-studio-devel] Shimmer and numix (was: unmet dependencies)
Hi Ross! :) Good to have you back, hope you had a nice holiday! On 2016-07-27 20:07, Ross Gammon wrote: > This has been resolved. > \o/ > For future reference, you can see the germination output of the seeds > for Yakkety here: > http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/germinate-output/ubuntustudio.yakkety/all > It helps to work out what is going on. Thank you, i had no idea of that page! > > The latest murrine-themes has been synced from Debian now (which was > actually on my todo list before I went on holiday - yey, one crossed off > - I love it when someone does the work when you are on holiday). > For your information, some packages, and mainly ones that had Ubuntu > specific modifications (giving the e.g. ubuntu1 extension to the version > number), do not get automatically synced from Debian. They need to be > merged manually. In this particular case, the Ubuntu specific > modifications were dropped with a manual sync. From now on, the latest > murrine-themes should sync across from Debian automatically. > That explains a lot, thank you! :) I've been looking into the theme thing with krytarik. As is now, we ship ubuntu studio with greybird as default theme. Last time we discussed the theme/look of the desktop, i want to remember many of us agreed on finding a darker theme. http://packages.ubuntu.com/yakkety/murrine-themes http://packages.ubuntu.com/yakkety/shimmer-themes Both Murrine and Shimmer have greybird (our default theme atm). But shimmer is shipped with Numix. And Numix is a pretty excellent theme. The cons as i see them for Numix are these: - The way focused windows differentiate themselves from other (same as greybird) - The very thin window border makes it hard to catch the corners to resize (same as gryebird) The pros: - It hear it is well maintained, like gerybird. - While it is dark, unlike most dark-themes you never get problems with webpage searchboxes displaying white text on white background. The default highlight color of numix is red, but krytarik found a fix from xubuntu unicorn to address this and let us have ubuntustudio blue instead. So, if i sound like i am pushing for a shift from murrine to shimmer and for shipping 16.10 with numix as default theme and window header, you got me alright. :D But of course, we need to agree on it first. What are your thoughts, team? Yours, -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
[ubuntu-studio-devel] unmet dependencies
Hi all, We seem to have a problem with murrine-themes: > The following packages have unmet dependencies: greybird-gtk-theme : > Breaks: murrine-themes (< 0.98.11~) but 0.98.6ubuntu1 is to be > installed E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken > packages. [1] I was informed that xubuntu are seeding shimmer-themes directly, rather than murrine-themes. Shouldn't we do the same? Any pros and cons we should be aware of? As with many of the technical things, i'm very much a noob in the whatnots of theming and its dependencies. That is, if you guys can break it down for me in the easiest possible way, i'd be super grateful. Yours, *Set [1] https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-studio-devel/2016-July/007952.html signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Add and remove packages
måndagen den 25:e juli 2016 kl. 13:03:00 CEST, Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net> skrev: On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 12:00:50 +0200, Set Hallstrom wrote: Could we get started on this list of work items sometime soon perhaps? https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/ubuntustudio-y-development I'd love to help, but i have no proper experience with that kind of packaging. But i'd love to learn... Why doesn't somebody provide step by step examples too the mailing list, when making the next packages. IOW really everything, how to package, how and what to upload. What to care about regarding Ubuntu policy. Since everything like this is kept as a secret, resp. is only provided by crappy English documentations, nobody is able to help you. that would be very nice, yes! :) zequence made quite a lot of documentation about it, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/UbuntuStudioPackageMaintenance but there is only that much docs one person can write while having a hole bunch of other responsabilities in check, and i can't find docs on how to remove or add apps to a package, for example add drumgizmo to ubuntustudio-audio... what i can offer in exchange of someone guiding me step by step, is to document the process as i exectute it... :) -- Set Hallström Sent from my Ubuntu pocket computer -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
[ubuntu-studio-devel] Add and remove packages
Hi all, Could we get started on this list of work items sometime soon perhaps? https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/ubuntustudio-y-development I'd love to help, but i have no proper experience with that kind of packaging. But i'd love to learn... -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Yakkety Alpha 2 (for opt-in flavors)
On 2016-07-24 23:17, Len Ovens wrote: > Ya, I haven't seen anything about packages actually being added > removed... maybe it has been done and I missed it. I just meant that if > the actual changes to our packages have not been made there is nothing > to test. Ok, thanks for clarifying, Len. No i haven't seen anything either. In fact no one has assigned themselves to a work item. https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/ubuntustudio-y-development I guess i should have been more alert and pushy... I'd love to do a few but someone has to teach me. -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Yakkety Alpha 2 (for opt-in flavors)
söndagen den 24:e juli 2016 kl. 16:20:46 CEST, Len Ovensskrev: Unless we have at least made the application changes there is no point. But we should do that. I haven't seen any more "we should add" we should remove" for a bit. Thanks Len, i must have misunderstood something, i thought that the discussion part ended at feature definition freeze on may 26th and that from there on we would work on implementing (adding, removing) what was discussed and entered in the blueprints, before we got to the featurefreeze on august 18th... ? https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/topic-y-ubuntustudio If you think there is still time to select packages, and discuss what to remove or add, i'm up for it. Although i admit i thought we were far beyond that point by now... https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/PackageSelection/yakkety *set -- Set Hallström Sent from my Ubuntu pocket computer -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
[ubuntu-studio-devel] Yakkety Alpha 2 (for opt-in flavors)
Hi all, As you can see here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/YakketyYak/ReleaseSchedule Next week is the opt-in alpha 2 release. Do we want/are we able to participate? It will be very difficult for me to find the time next week and without getting in details, i'd therefor rather not participate. However, if you guys feel it is important, i'll do my best to join the party. Yours, -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] 16.04.1 RC Testing
Hi, Today I updated the download page of the website, created a post to announce to dot release here: http://ubuntustudio.org/2016/07/ubuntu-studio-16-04-1-released/ and added a link to the 16.04.1 change summary on our Release notes wiki page: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/XenialXerus/ReleaseNotes/UbuntuStudio Please have a look and let me know if something is wrong or needs complementary information. Sorry it took so long, life knocked on the door and had other plans. Yours, -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] i386 EOL plans for Ubuntu Studio?
Hi, Thanks for reaching out! On 2016-07-11 20:50, Bryan Quigley wrote: > > *Wait until after 18.04 and then reconsider dropping i386* > This is what i am in favor of. That is: I am also in favor of keeping 32bit version. I also value the ecological aspect of reusing old machines, and motivating friends and acquaintances to reuse their old machine as an excuse to introduce them to FLOSS, as Len and Yoshi express. Given the small size of the team, i'm sure we would save a lot of sweat by dropping 32-bit. But i think that argument says more about the work we need to do to repopulate the team, than what system we should support or not. On that note, i'd like to say: Welcome to the list, Yoshi. :) -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] 16.04.1 RC Testing
On 2016-07-19 12:03, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > There are no previous dot release notes AFAIK. IMO, we can add to the > same release notes. Just add a new header at the bottom for the dot > release for any important changes Noted, thank you! -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] 16.04.1 RC Testing
On 2016-07-19 07:25, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > Let me just remind everyone that 16.04.1 is to be tested before release > on thrusday. If I remember correctly, Ross would is not able to > participate for this one. > > ISOs and test cases can be found here > http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/363/builds. > > If you want to help out, make sure to get yourself a launchpad account, > login, and then follow instructions on the link above for testing and > reporting results. Also, please report any bugs you find. > > There may be rebuilds, so we may need to redo tests a few times until > Thursday, but consider each ISO a release candidate from now on. > Thank you Kaj! Sorry, i got confused with the alpha2 date next week. But i've found the schedule for dot releases now [1] Although it doesn't announce for when .2 is planned. Is there another wiki page for these schedules? Indeed, Ross will be away. I can write the release notes.. Although i don't find any previous dot release notes for ubuntustudio to base on. Is it better to edit the Xenial release note page [2], or should it be a separate one? I did find a "change summary" for the 14.04.x releases [3], maybe a link to the upcoming 16.04.1 change summary and an announcement on the website is enough? [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/XenialXerus/ReleaseSchedule [2] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/XenialXerus/ReleaseNotes/UbuntuStudio [3] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TrustyTahr/ReleaseNotes/ChangeSummary/14.04.4 -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Apologies
Thanks for getting back to us and for offering your time and ressources to help us! I'm currently in a family reunion and can only surface sporadically. I will be back 100% next Wednesday. torsdagen den 14:e juli 2016 kl. 22:52:36 CEST, C de-Avillezskrev: It would be nice for someone to contact the other party, as well. Cheers, ..C.. Prior to adressing the list, i reached out privately to Jimmy and Kaj. In all honesty, they were both very short mails. I didn't see any reason to develop any argumentation or justifications as to why i adressed them like i did, and opted for simply stateing the facts: that i am sorry and what i am sorry for. I regret making Jimmy feel rejected and for using provocative phrasing and added that i in fact do value his feedback when he finds the time for it. With Kaj i regret my wording onlist and in private and added that i do not see him like the bad person i painted him as, in the midst of my anger. Kaj responded quickly and humbly, Jimmy is taking his time but i think it is fair enough. Set -- Set Hallström Sent from my Ubuntu pocket computer -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Apologies
On 2016-07-14 10:23, Set Hallstrom wrote: > the group as a hole erm... the group as a whole, of course... -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
[ubuntu-studio-devel] Apologies
Hi all, First of all: i am very sorry things went so sour in that discussion. I feel i owe everyone an apology: I apologize for letting my own feelings take the lead. Kaj, Jimmy and the group as a hole. Who wants to work with a grumpy extremist with static ways? Not me. Many of the blames i formulated were probably aimed at myself: i understand this project is not the place to push my freesoftware philosophy agenda in 7 steps, to Set us free, hackers, to Set us free. I understand i need to leave discussions open for solutions in an inclusive way for the benefit of the team and the users, over the benefit of my personal integrity. I realize i tend to be triggered by the idea of using mainstream media, and i will work on that. While i admit still being in the midst of a thought process, for now i can say this: i do understand it is up to the community in its entirety; users and devels a-like to decide how, when, why and what tools we use. Not up to my personal beliefs to determine what is appropriate or not for our project. This is our project, not mine. I understand i came across as an extremist/purist/grumpycat, but i assure you i am not. I am just a pingnu perfectly comfortable with the compromises Ubuntu does in order to enable the community to welcome users of all levels of computer literacy. If i wasn't comfortable with this, i wouldn't be here to begin with. TBH with you and myself, i'm still working on understanding what made me allow myself to be stubborn and exclusive, and while at the moment i might not be in the brightest most secure position in my life away from keyboard, i will work hard to address it and to make sure i do not get the community mixed up with my moods again. I reached out fairly soon the to community council to ask for help but they haven't responded yet. In all sincerity, i'm glad they didn't get back ASAP, because it let me marinate in my mess for a moment giving me time to get back down and reflect upon my own behavior. But i look forward to develop contact with them because i think they have experiences, tools and ideas we may benefit from. I do not plan to bail on you, unless that would be the desire/best-interest of the group and i hope you will give me the chance to show you that i can learn from my mistakes. Hopefully, from here we will be able to move forward to release yet another great version of Ubuntu Studio in happy collaboration, without leaving any mess under the rugg... Yours sincerly, -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Ubuntu Studio policy - Was: Would Ubuntu Studio Team be Interested in Partnering with New England Conservatory?
On 2016-07-10 12:42, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > > So, let me say this one last thing about the discussion whether we > should or should not use Google Hangouts. > This has _nothing_ to do with google hangouts. This is about an inactive member, spreading confusion to a 3rd part, insulting a fellow team-member for the 3rd and last time, and as you can read bellow, using team resources to push a freelance IT-consultation agenda for free as in beer. On 2016-07-10 12:39, Jimmy Sjölund wrote: > The plan was to offer an opportunity for the OP to talk with someone with: > > * 22 years experience of digital audio in corporate and educational > environments > * 16 years experience of Linux and open source environments > * 10 years experience of Ubuntu Studio > * 5 years experience of open source community work > * large scale implementation projects rolling out open source environments > * small and large scale implementation projects of replacing Windows > with open source alternatives > > From there, figure out what their goals were, what problems to solve, > the current environment and alternate solutions. This is what I do for a > living and have been doing since the 90s so I figured I might have some > insights to share, for free. The solution wouldn't necessarily be Ubuntu > Studio, without knowing what the needs are it's too early to propose > solutions. All issues are not connected to Canonical, Ubuntu or even > open source. > > I won't bother commenting on other parts in earlier emails. I recommend > reading Jono Bacon's book "The Art of Community" and Jim Whitehurst's > "The Open Organization". > > I will now unsubscribe from the mailing list as well and keep out of any > further discussions. > > /Jimmy > > Thank you for your suggestion and for revealing your intentions publicly. I knew you wouldn't just drop your subscription before making sure you had succeeder in generating a little drama, so i can only blame myself: i really should have just ignored you, since as far as i can remember, you tend to "hit and run" the team as you eloquently put yourself, whenever there is controversy or polemic around. Yes, you've made this into a personal issue, i am sorry about it, but i am human too, with all the weakness that implies. Peace yo! -- Set Sakrecoer -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Would Ubuntu Studio Team be Interested in Partnering with New England Conservatory?
On 2016-07-10 11:48, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > On Sun, Jul 10, 2016, at 11:34 AM, Set Hallstrom wrote: >> On 2016-07-10 11:10, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: >>> Just want to mention a couple of things. >>> >>> The way this communication was handled here has led to that Jimmy left >>> our team, which is a bad thing (Jimmy, me and Len are the oldest active >>> members of this community, currently). >>> >>> Jimmy takes an initiative, but instead of being encouraged he is stopped >>> by something clearly unimportant in this particular situation. >> >> Ok, he took an initiative, and formulated it as an initiative on behalf >> of the group. It was a miscommunication, ok, we get that now. >> >> Why not just correct the shot instead of tacitly call a fellow team-mate >> narrowminded contraproductive. > > Perhaps your own words describe it best. Or, if I rewrite it to > "narrowmindedly counterproductive". > > At least, it is clear that you are very stubborn and not ready to back > one inch from your original position - which in itself is not the Ubuntu > Studio position, but your own personal position. You don't actually > promote discussion. Just that you are prepared to fire more words at it, > if someone is ready to listen to them - since you clearly are not ready > to reevaluate your role in this project and what the project is actually > about. Sure, flaming someone up publicly like you do now is a good way to make someone back down. FTR, i've expressed countless of times that i came to understand that jimmy did NOT talk on behalf of a group. The only one who took things personaly in this case is Jimmy. However, since you now make this your own personal issue publicly: if anyone has a record in bad conflict-management enabling them to be judgemental about this kind of attitude, i don't think it is you, zequence. > >> >>> >>> Using Google Hangouts for live communication would in no way mean Ubuntu >>> Studio is promoting Google - just that a few people would be using a >>> very simple solution for live communication. If Set feels other tools >>> would be better, and simple enough to set up, he can always work out the >>> solution and present it as an alternative, once he has done so. >> >> No, it was jimmy's initiative. If HE wants to help with video HE should >> set up a sollution for video conference. Using hangouts or skype would >> exclude major part of the team from taking part. > > It would evidently exclude one person - the project lead, who is not > ready to be flexible enough to meet the needs of the rest of the team. I'm affraid it is not up to you to decide. And i find it ironcial that you of all past project leads invoke flexibility. But sure, set up a vote: Who is the villain that should be fired? Good Ubuntu Studio spirit my friend. > >> >> And like i said MANY times, i don't care what jimmy does in his >> freetime. However, being a member of the team, if jimmy writes "we" to a >> 3rd part in the context of this list then he has to assume to be read as >> taking an initiative on behlaf of the group. This is basic >> communciation. Had that mail of his been sent off-list directly to Devin >> nothing of this would have been necessary. There was already clear signs >> of confusion in the discussion regarding what the team could do for NEC >> or not, i felt Jimmy's freelance shot had the potential to build uppon >> that confusion and corrected that. >> >> Believe it or not, i have regards concerning Jimmy. I do enjoy him as a >> person. But this drama number has severely affected me personaly and the >> way i perceive him. Trying to look back i wonder what he has done, but i >> sure know it is the 3rd time he calls me out for being a conservative >> freesoftware extremist. And Last time someone slammed the door on me >> over a simple disagreement, i was a teenager. >> >>> >>> Our work is to promote Ubuntu Studio, which in itself is not 100% free >>> software, so having zero tolerance to non-free software in combination >>> with Ubuntu Studio is hypocrisy. It is not up to us who uses free >>> software, and we couldn't provide a 100% free software solution anyway >>> already because of the kernel. If someone wants to use a completely free >>> solution Ubuntu Studio is not the right choice - neither for the user or >>> the developer. It's just an impossibility. >>> That said, we do promote free software. And we do that through Ubuntu >>> Studio, which is where the focus should be. Using non free services in >>> order to reach as many
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Would Ubuntu Studio Team be Interested in Partnering with New England Conservatory?
On 2016-07-10 11:10, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > Just want to mention a couple of things. > > The way this communication was handled here has led to that Jimmy left > our team, which is a bad thing (Jimmy, me and Len are the oldest active > members of this community, currently). > > Jimmy takes an initiative, but instead of being encouraged he is stopped > by something clearly unimportant in this particular situation. Ok, he took an initiative, and formulated it as an initiative on behalf of the group. It was a miscommunication, ok, we get that now. Why not just correct the shot instead of tacitly call a fellow team-mate narrowminded contraproductive. > > Using Google Hangouts for live communication would in no way mean Ubuntu > Studio is promoting Google - just that a few people would be using a > very simple solution for live communication. If Set feels other tools > would be better, and simple enough to set up, he can always work out the > solution and present it as an alternative, once he has done so. No, it was jimmy's initiative. If HE wants to help with video HE should set up a sollution for video conference. Using hangouts or skype would exclude major part of the team from taking part. And like i said MANY times, i don't care what jimmy does in his freetime. However, being a member of the team, if jimmy writes "we" to a 3rd part in the context of this list then he has to assume to be read as taking an initiative on behlaf of the group. This is basic communciation. Had that mail of his been sent off-list directly to Devin nothing of this would have been necessary. There was already clear signs of confusion in the discussion regarding what the team could do for NEC or not, i felt Jimmy's freelance shot had the potential to build uppon that confusion and corrected that. Believe it or not, i have regards concerning Jimmy. I do enjoy him as a person. But this drama number has severely affected me personaly and the way i perceive him. Trying to look back i wonder what he has done, but i sure know it is the 3rd time he calls me out for being a conservative freesoftware extremist. And Last time someone slammed the door on me over a simple disagreement, i was a teenager. > > Our work is to promote Ubuntu Studio, which in itself is not 100% free > software, so having zero tolerance to non-free software in combination > with Ubuntu Studio is hypocrisy. It is not up to us who uses free > software, and we couldn't provide a 100% free software solution anyway > already because of the kernel. If someone wants to use a completely free > solution Ubuntu Studio is not the right choice - neither for the user or > the developer. It's just an impossibility. > That said, we do promote free software. And we do that through Ubuntu > Studio, which is where the focus should be. Using non free services in > order to reach as many people as possible is unfortunate, but it is also > the best way to do that in this moment. Not using those services will > just add barriers where there already are too many barriers, in order > for people to discover the free software world. > > We are not crusading against Google, Facebook, or any other such > services. We are not *against* non-free software, in fact. But, we are > *for* free software. It's a big difference. Exactly, we are FOR free software. That means we should first look for freesoftware alternatives. If you come with a plan, than make it happen. Now i understand Jimmy did NOT speak on behalf of the group. Why is that? Maybe he hasn't felt like a member for a long time? I don't know, i can just speculate. His departue sure is a loss, and i wish things would have worked out differently. But they didn't. I understand you stand up for your buddy, but reviving this discussion is not going to sort anything out. If anyone has a problem with with my attitude in this discussion and think there is something i should learn, i welcome them to bring it up with either me or jimmy off-list. Thank you. -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Would Ubuntu Studio Team be Interested in Partnering with New England Conservatory?
On 2016-07-09 13:08, Jimmy Sjölund wrote: > Original Message >> Subject: Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Would Ubuntu Studio Team be >> Interested in Partnering with New England Conservatory? Local Time: >> July 9, 2016 12:53 PM UTC Time: July 9, 2016 10:53 AM From: >> s...@ubuntustudio.org To: ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com >> >> >> it is very hard and confusing to read your emails, jimmy. you do >> not quote properly. > > I have filed a bug to ProtonMail. Not much more I can do > unfortunately other than to edit > myself. Fair enough. I didn't know protonmail dose not allow Mail-clients. >>> when you write 'we' in the context of the list you have to expect >>> being read as speaking on behalf of the team. for personal >>> matters please use email off-list > > I wrote "we" as in Devin and me No, You wrote > _We_ could set up a video call or Google Hangout if you would like to > discuss a bit more easily. In the context of the list, being the devel-team member that you are, that sounds like "we, the team" to me... Maybe i'm the only one, but i can't read your mind, sorry about that. I also apologize if i anticipated Devin misunderstanding your statement as if "we", the team, would set up a video conference for his project. > and last I checked I was still considered a member of the team. Nobody is questioning your membership. (except maybe you in this response and your launchpad karma page, but we all now launchpad isn't necessarily representative) > In > all my years in the Ubuntu Studio community have I heard that we were > not allowed to continue a discussion in the thread on the mailing > list. I did not know that as a member of the team I would need > approval from anyone to talk to someone else. That's not a community > I would support. Nobody suggested you are not allowed to continue discussions. All _i_ did was to correct/question what you ment by "we" and ask you if you could set up video conferences using tools aligned with our philosophy: http://ubuntustudio.org/about-ubuntustudio/ >> >>> as for your implication of narrow minded attitude, i reckon that >>> is a matter of POV. However, as you may know, this is a foss >>> mailing list. >> >>> Of course we should listen to NEC, non the less to use the teams >>> sparse ressources to set up specialized ressources is detrimental >>> to our >> focus. >>> Given it is used properly, email is an excellent format to >>> develop >> ideas >>> and concepts, o is IRC. Ubuntu Studio is in itself proof of this >> statement. >> > > How I use my own time and resources is up to me. I did not suggest > anyone else would join a potential talk or put in time unless they > wanted to or that Ubuntu Studio should set up any special resources > for any party. I think you have misunderstood the whole point of my > suggestion to have a chat with NEC. No jimmy: you missunderstood me. I think you need to read my mails a couple of more times: all i did was to say you may use your time however you want with whatever software you want, but to underline that you may use your own personal tools for your own personal agenda. Basicaly, exactly what you state here above. > > Further, if the OP feels email is limiting their way to express > themselves, why would it be an issue to communicate in any other > way? Email and IRC is not the best way for everyone. > Sure thing! However, at this point, there is nothing much we can do since the issue should be addressed to canonical. But like i wrote and write again: you are welcome to give your personal assistance to anyone. And If you do so using the group's tools, please be wary to pinpoint that it is your own personal initiative, and avoid generalizing terms such as "we", when you in fact mean "he/her and me". > This thread is getting ridiculous. I'm out. > > /Jimmy > I agree, by taking everything personally you made it so. I understand from previous discussion between you and me that you have a personal issue with my ethics. I hereby kindly invite you to take those issues up with me personally off-list. Letting your frustration roll out on the list makes us all look bad. Devin: i'm sorry this thread took the appearance of you ending up in the middle of this. But you aren't the cause for anything here. You are doing the right thing by asking for guidance and motivating everyone with your constructive ways. Like i said previously: Rest assured you are welcome to ask any question to the list or team and we will do our best to help you to the possible extend. However, and i repeat, canonical is your channel, they might indeed be able to set-up a conference with hang-outs, i've only talked to them via IRC. -- Set Sakrecoer -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Would Ubuntu Studio Team be Interested in Partnering with New England Conservatory?
lördagen den 9:e juli 2016 kl. 12:02:02 CEST, Jimmy Sjölundskrev: Original Message Subject: Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Would Ubuntu Studio Team be Interested in Partnering with New England Conservatory? Local Time: July 9, 2016 11:06 AM UTC Time: July 9, 2016 9:06 AM From: s...@ubuntustudio.org To: ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com fredagen den 8:e juli 2016 kl. 19:31:14 CEST, Jimmy Sjölund skrev: We could set up a video call or Google Hangout if you would like to discuss a bit more easily. Have you joined canonical Jimmy? No. Afaik, ubuntu studio has no tools for video conference available. No, not really. I'm no one to tell you if you should or not join efforts with NEC to help them free their computing, but if you do; please do so on your own behalf. If you want to include the team to spend time and energy in a video conference to help a third part, at least make sure you discuss the options with- and set up the tools for the team first. No, of course I wouldn't set up a meeting for someone else. If Devin would be interested to discuss open source with someone in the community I would try to make that happen, within my own schedule. As he wrote it was difficult through email I suggested another form of communication that might be easier. Misunderstand me right, I'd love to see you point us to existing tools or set freesoftware video conferences up so that the devel team can discuss internal issues more easily. However, hangouts or skype are no options. How the devel team discuss internal things was not in scope. I suggested using a video conference or Google Hangout with another person, hence the "we". Not "we" as everyone on the list. As Canonical (or anyone else) has not found any good alternative so far, all Ubuntu conferences have used Google Hangout for years. Unfortunate yes, but until good alternatives are available that is what they have chosen. As I suggested a call with someone outside of the open source world a hangout might be the best way to start as it much more likely that they have used it before or at least will be able to easily set it up to discuss matters. At a later stage other means of communication might be used. Saying that it's not an option to use anything other than free software it's quite narrow minded and not very productive. What you chose to use for internal discussions within the devel team is up to you and the team. Besides, what I use as a person to help someone out, who is considering trying to use open source, is up to me. Surely, I would not make any promises or speak on behalf of the whole community or Canonical or anything. But to listen to NEC and their questions and perhaps point them in a direction to get answers. That's how the community works. /Jimmy it is very hard and confusing to read your emails, jimmy. you do not quote properly. when you write 'we' in the context of the list you have to expect being read as speaking on behalf of the team. for personal matters please use email off-list. as for your implication of narrow minded attitude, i reckon that is a matter of POV. However, as you may know, this is a foss mailing list. Of course we should listen to NEC, non the less to use the teams sparse ressources to set up specialized ressources is detrimental to our focus. Given it is used properly, email is an excellent format to develop ideas and concepts, o is IRC. Ubuntu Studio is in itself proof of this statement. -- Set Hallström Sent from my Ubuntu pocket computer -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Would Ubuntu Studio Team be Interested in Partnering with New England Conservatory?
fredagen den 8:e juli 2016 kl. 19:31:14 CEST, Jimmy Sjölundskrev: We could set up a video call or Google Hangout if you would like to discuss a bit more easily. Have you joined canonical Jimmy? Afaik, ubuntu studio has no tools for video conference available. I'm no one to tell you if you should or not join efforts with NEC to help them free their computing, but if you do; please do so on your own behalf. If you want to include the team to spend time and energy in a video conference to help a third part, at least make sure you discuss the options with- and set up the tools for the team first. Misunderstand me right, I'd love to see you point us to existing tools or set freesoftware video conferences up so that the devel team can discuss internal issues more easily. However, hangouts or skype are no options. *Set -- Set Hallström Sent from my Ubuntu pocket computer -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Would Ubuntu Studio Team be Interested in Partnering with New England Conservatory?
Hi, On 2016-07-07 23:15, Devin Ulibarri wrote: > Hi, > > This is my update: > > I just found out that the IT team at New England Conservatory (NEC) > is purchasing DELL computers with "Ubuntu" pre-installed, but wiping > their hard drives and installing Windows instead. > > The IT team said they are willing to consider making some computers > available with Ubuntu (or Ubuntu Studio) on them, but they need a > educational reason before they commit themselves to providing these > computers to NEC. > > I am working with other teachers to see if we can bring Ubuntu > Studio to the school. > > Also I still think that a clear, "official-ish" message from the > core team of Ubuntu Studio would be a great asset. So far, I have > been telling people that "If NEC students provide bug reports, > Ubuntu developers will respond to fix them". Does that sound > correct? > No, it doesn't sound correct. We are a small team of volunteers working for the love of Art under the Ubuntu (canonical) umbrella, and we haven't given you any such promises. Have you talked to Canonical? They are the only ones that may pronounce themselves on this level. The Ubuntu Studio developer team is dedicated to package multimedia software into an Ubuntu flavor for multimedia production. You *cannot* expect Ubuntu _Studio_ to prioritize your schools matter over any other user. > Is there anything else I can add without over-reaching any promises? I'm sorry if i wasn't clear enough when i wrote to you On 2016-05-30 09:17, Set Hallstrom wrote: > >> TBH our "brand" belongs to Canonical. Hence we cannot provide you >> with any such support officially without the benediction of >> Canonical. So if you need the backup of a corporation, your best >> bet is to talk to canonical directly. But like Autumna says, it >> isn't necessary. After all GNU/Linux is (not limited to, but also) >> about computing /by/ the people /for/ the people. >> If you want to use Ubuntu Studio in your classes, you are welcome to do so on your own behalf. If you expect official statements and support guarantees, please reach out to Canonical. http://partners.ubuntu.com/contact-us However, and *no promisses attached* , i will personaly try my best to forward your intentions in order to put you on the right path within that organisation. -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Call for Ardour Backport Testing
Hi all, On 2016-06-28 19:39, Ross Gammon wrote: > I think it would be a good idea to put the message out on the US > blog, and forum. Maybe that we could state that: > 1. we have just started on the work, and the first one (ardour) will > hopefully be available soon. > 2. Backports have to be manually installed by the user (linking to > https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuBackports), and that users > should be careful that they definitely need the new version, because > the new version may be better, but also could have some new bugs not > found yet, and because sometimes the new version might use a newer > data format that is not backwards compatible. > 3. That we always need help to create and test the backports, linking > to: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/BackportsList (status of the > work) https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/BackportsHowToHelp (how to > get set up to backport - generic details of the process) > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/Backports (the Ubuntu Studio > specific process) How about this? cfhowlett, any input? some one care for checking my plurals and grammar? :) Am I Forgetting something or Misscomunicating something? It's a bit "meaty" (lots of text), but, in terms of implications it isn't the "simplest" process there is either i guess.. Anny suggestion is welcome really :) --- Title: Backports, the benefits and the consequences. Ubuntu Studio is happy to announce that backports are going to be rolling out soon and that the first one is Ardour. Backports (https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuBackports) are newer version of applications, rolled back to "older" version of the System. For example in the case of Ardour, Ubuntu Studio users running 16.04 will be able to have the latest version available in 16.10 /without/ upgrading the entire system. This is a great thing, and with great power comes great responsibility: Backports have to be manually installed by the user, and the user will be required to carefully and think about the possible consequences: [strong]The new version may be better, but it could also have some new bugs not found yet, and sometimes the new version might use a newer data format that is _not backwards compatible_.[/strong] This means that if you are in the middle of a project, backporting your tools can potentially compromise your projects deadline, or worse. Whatever mistake you do, you can of course always rollback, but remember: *Better safe than sorry* : _always_ back-up your project data before installing a backport. In order to be able to provide you with backports for other pieces of software shipped with Ubuntu Studio, the devel-team could need a hand. If you have a little spare-time that you can share with the community, here is how you can help out: You will find a list of the status of the work here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/BackportsList ( Here are instructions on how to get set up to backport with generic details of the process: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/BackportsHowToHelp And here is the Ubuntu Studio specific process: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/Backports Please feel welcome and invited to ask the Ubuntu Studio devel-team for more details, help, instructions or to suggest a package for backporting by stopping by our freenode IRC channel #ubuntustudio-devel: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuStudio/IRC or dropping an email on the ubuntustudio-devel mailing list: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel --- -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Studio icons
Hi! On 2016-06-29 21:23, Jóhann Örn Geirdal wrote: > I also suggest to make the orange stronger! Not sure what you mean by "stronger", but in my terminology ubuntustudio orange is stronger, and the one you are using is brighter. The orange you are using is: #FF8D00 The orange ubuntustudio is using is: #E27D15 https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/Artwork/OfficialXenial This is not up for discussion at this point of the process. > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 4:51 PM, Jóhann Örn Geirdal > <johann.orn.geir...@gmail.com wrote: > > Here I have proposal to new icons in studio default apps. Have in > mynd that some Logos are better designed than others for each app. > http://geirdal.is/index.php/studio-0 I'm afraid I do not see this working at all Jóhann: scale the icons down to 24px and they become unreadable. Also the style is way to organic and personal. We need something _very_ functional and very neutral. I think we should find something existing to work from if we want to pull this off. Something we could easily convert into monochrome. Making good pictograms that work in small and large scale is a very tedious, complicated and fine task. I hope you understand that i'm not saying your icons or ugly or anything like that. I'm just saying they don't fit the project as they look now. :) *Set -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Alpha & Beta testing
Hi Ross, On 2016-06-28 20:01, Ross Gammon wrote: I think the Alphas are more for testing some new feature or major change. I am not aware of anything landing that is earth shattering. Running the package tracker manual tests (http://packages.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/361/builds/117793/testcases) on the Yakkety daily build every now and then, to see if the new packages synced from Debian have any issues is arguably a more useful a task. Makes sense, thank you :) For practise on ISO testing and releasing:-) we also have: Xenial 16.04.1 point release on 21st July Trusty 14.04.5 point release on 6th August Who needs wireless network(?): I was about to ask about these dot-releases next :) Is there a schedule-wiki-page for these? Note: I will not be around on the 21st July, so I hope experience hands like Len, Kaj and flocculant can help out if required. Unless we are allowed to do it at our own pace? Your absence might be a good reason to do it at our own pace, but given the margin i'm sure we can come up with a master-plan to make it happen while you have a great and relaxed July 21st :) Yours, Set -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Call for Ardour Backport Testing
On 2016-06-28 19:39, Ross Gammon wrote: Hi All, Thanks for the testing! I think it should be enough to please the Backporters Team, and they will hopefully look at it soon. Sorry for being a bit silent lately. Due to a hard disk issue, my main machine was slowing to a crawl constantly. That's why I dropped out during the Team Meeting :-) I think it would be a good idea to put the message out on the US blog, and forum. Maybe that we could state that: 1. we have just started on the work, and the first one (ardour) will hopefully be available soon. 2. Backports have to be manually installed by the user (linking to https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuBackports), and that users should be careful that they definitely need the new version, because the new version may be better, but also could have some new bugs not found yet, and because sometimes the new version might use a newer data format that is not backwards compatible. 3. That we always need help to create and test the backports, linking to: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/BackportsList (status of the work) https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/BackportsHowToHelp (how to get set up to backport - generic details of the process) https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/Backports (the Ubuntu Studio specific process) Sorry I can't give a more polished suggestion of wording just now. We could probably do with a shorter "how to test description", as the linked pages cover lots. A tester just needs to monitor the Backports List wiki, and then install the Backport Testing ppa and test, and then report the results on the bug. Cheers, Ross This is great Ross, Thank you! (and sorry it took me longer than wished to do the actual testing) For the polished wording, i'm sure we can can cook something up with your excellent communiqué-sketch. cfhowlett: PR ping-pong with me? :) anybody else is game for some backport PSA smithery? Yours, Set -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
[ubuntu-studio-devel] Alpha & Beta testing
Hi list, Today on the release list they asked if we wanted to participate in the alpha and beta releases. I assumed we are not participating in the alpha 1, and guaranteed that we will participate in the final Beta. But how about Alpha 2 and Beta 1? I understand its a bit of a "momentum"-moment and that it takes from our precious personal summer-time, but perhaps it would be a good exercise to participate in Alpha 2? We have a few new member that could benefit from seeing how it works before we reach the final bosses on September 22nd https://wiki.ubuntu.com/YakketyYak/ReleaseSchedule What are your thoughts about it? Yours, -- Set Hallstrom AKA ~sakrecoer -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel