Hi folks-
The prospect of getting a compilation album of carl craig's retroactive
label seemed like a good idea at the time, but DO NOT get the LP that
Buzz has re-issued called Equinox : Night and Da.
True, those songs on their are really interesting; wrap me in his
arms..ect Even the
i wanted to say that the three tracks on side B are pressed *a little*
better. Honestly though, were all the retroactive pressing really that
quiet? Somebody with originals care to chime in?
sorry about the double post, I'll try to consolidate my thoughts next
time.
yours
-j
On Wednesday,
im going to ask buzz what the deal is. (anybody here have any ideas why
they cant do a decent re-press?)
The poor sound quality is partly down to the fact that (like the Transmat
Relics LP that was 'repressed' recently) this is a bootleg of the original
Buzz LP, not a remaster or even a
thank you very much for the info Tom-
thats why the record sounds like a recycled pepsi can :) does the
original buzz comp sound good enough to 'play out' or should i look for
the original 12s the rest of my life?
-j
On Wednesday, May 5, 2004, at 07:40 PM, Tom Churchill wrote:
im going to
mei 2004 1:52
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: (313) bad pressing alert
Hi folks-
The prospect of getting a compilation album of carl craig's retroactive
label seemed like a good idea at the time, but DO NOT get the LP that
Buzz has re-issued called Equinox : Night and Da.
True, those songs
Similar to when you make a copy of a cassette to a second cassette,
then that second to a third cassette. The quality has diminished. I
don't know the technical term for it.
If you say those older records are full on the bass, it leads me to
believe that problems were not that they were of
does the
original buzz comp sound good enough to 'play out' or should i look for
the original 12s the rest of my life?
like Tom said, squeeze all that music on one side of vinyl anyway and the
difference between that and a 12 (especially for playing out)is even
audible to my ears (so it must be
Re: (313) bad pressing alert
panic in detroit?
this one..
they probably did do it from the cd, I don't know.
sounds s**t however they did it.
Alex
_
- End of message text
This e-mail is sent by the above
record lables like
Buzz? Could Carl bootleg his own release?
Quest Pond
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 May 2004 17:38
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) bad pressing alert
panic in detroit?
this one..
they probably did do
Does anyone know what happens to the rights of defunct record lables like
Buzz? Could Carl bootleg his own release?
Carl still owns the rights, Buzz just licensed tracks...
Martin
Does anyone know what happens to the rights of defunct record lables like
Buzz? Could Carl bootleg his own release?
I would imagine (but don't really know), that Buzz just licensed all the
tracks in question.
(on these compilation releases anyway)
Isn't the main reason the record would sound
on 5/6/04 5:38 AM, Martin Dust at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know what happens to the rights of defunct record lables like
Buzz? Could Carl bootleg his own release?
Carl still owns the rights, Buzz just licensed tracks...
Martin
exactly. Carl would not have to bootleg his
Subject: Re: (313) bad pressing alert
on 5/6/04 5:38 AM, Martin Dust at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know what happens to the rights of defunct record lables like
Buzz? Could Carl bootleg his own release?
Carl still owns the rights, Buzz just licensed tracks...
Martin
exactly
To: matrix313; Martin Dust; 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: RE: (313) bad pressing alert
Thanks everyone.
How do we know Carl didn't re-release this copy then? Might be a silly
question sorry, its just everyone is saying bootleg but i'm wondering.
Quest
-Original Message-
From: matrix313
How do we know Carl didn't re-release this copy then? Might be a silly
question sorry, its just everyone is saying bootleg but i'm wondering.
Well, just guessing again, but I would presume that Carl could get it
mastered properly from his master tapes, and would have no need to brand it
as a
See last years Planet E re-issue of As Time Goes By, or Urban Tribe's
Covert Action as an example
(was it time goes by? can't remember!)
Not 'Time Goes By' IRRC.
By the way, 'Covert Action' repress was slightly inferior in sound quality
to the original (on the EP with 'Eastward') to my
See last years Planet E re-issue of As Time Goes By, or Urban Tribe's
Covert Action as an example (was it time goes by? can't remember!)
Not 'Time Goes By' IRRC.
Yeah, it was - the 12 included A Wonderful Life and As Time Goes By
(Sitting Under a Tree)... see
Just what I was afraid of sigh!
k
-Original Message-
From: Tom Churchill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 11:01 AM
To: Odeluga, Ken; Alex Bond; 313
Subject: Re: (313) bad pressing alert
See last years Planet E re-issue of As Time Goes By, or Urban Tribe's
Remember the early 90s, when pressing 4 or even more tracks per side was
common for LPs (check out many Trax LPs licensed to PRT, etc)? Whilst there
was some weakness in volume, it's nowhere near as bad as the repress in
question sounds. So it is definitely a duffer.
I agree. I'm not the big fan
Yehaw! Looky'dere folks! Alex One Shot Bond is back in town to
rustle up all you scaly snake bootleggers and chase you out of town like a
mean dog after a school girl. An if there any of you sly song stealin'
vinyl stampers left he's gunna shoot'cha right between your pearly blues.
Go
21 matches
Mail list logo
