I think there is definatly something very profound about the analogue
sound of
real to real as opposed to ADAT. When you record digitally every
millisecond
of time is accounted for and everything inbetween doesn't exsist. When
you use
tape, there exsists another dimension of time. Inbetween
One comment, one question:
This list certainly has a lot of traffic lately.
Does anyone on this list think that, for music created exclusively on
computers, or even with external equipment (to the tune of synths,
drum-machines), that pressing the tracks on vinyl preserves sound quality
that
I had this notion that part of the reason I liked the sounds of analog
tape and vinyl was coz they recorded EVERYTHING. The atmosphere included
the inaudible range of frequencies that we still respond to. Certainly the
old CDs would cut those frequencies out (space or something). Is this
still the
how did the producers in the early days do their recordings??? with a 4
track or straight to 1/4 inch?
What kind of effects did they use?.. i'd love to be able to attempt to
recreate some of that feel.
peace,
mike
[aentrikate]
mee-thod wrote:
Ryan, i think it was, mentioned the atmosphere of of recordings of jazz
and blues.
I had this notion that part of the reason I liked the sounds of analog
tape and vinyl was coz they recorded EVERYTHING. The atmosphere included
the inaudible range of frequencies that we still
jim proffit wrote:
44.1kHz digital recording (CD's) is still in the 20Hz-20kHz range parameters
like it was when it was introduced. 12 vinyl cuts the bass approx. from
50Hz, so CD beats it in the low end. Not sure what limitations vinyl has
with the higher frequencies... However excessive
On Wed, 21 Jun 2000, .. - wrote:
Does anyone on this list think that, for music created exclusively on
computers, or even with external equipment (to the tune of synths,
drum-machines), that pressing the tracks on vinyl preserves sound quality
that cannot be achieved on compact disc? (dvd
another 2cents on the subject-
i disagree with the notion that analog recording captures everything,
and this is what makes it sound warm. Magnetic tape stores the sound on
tiny magnetic particles whose polarity can be changed by the record head-
the precision of which is probably pretty
I agree, but what I was really trying to get at is the possibility that there
exsists another dimesion of time space, possibly a parrallel universe in the
physical recording of sound or even video. Instead of tranfering thought onto a
binary platform of zeros and ones, you are actually creating
I'd rather listen to lo-fi tracks with tape hiss, tracks that
have emotion
and trying, than to listen to these clinical super produced
909-kick tracks.
Talking about which... I know these two are not Detroit artists, but are
there any Detroit artists doing such a great and interesting job as
From: c myster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: [313] Old recording techniques...
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2000 01:37:29 -0500
What impresses me is the attention to Detail.
Derrick would would actually Splice peices of tape and
insert it backwards to give it that backspin sound
Check out the roster on DeepChord records..it's Detroit, it clicks, and it
knows how to go deep. www.deepchord.com
Fred
From: Gwendal Cobert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: RE: [313] Old recording techniques...
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 10:37:36 +0200
I'd rather listen to lo
I think there is definatly something very profound about the analogue sound of
real to real as opposed to ADAT. When you record digitally every millisecond
of time is accounted for and everything inbetween doesn't exsist. When you use
tape, there exsists another dimension of time. Inbetween
PROTECTED]
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: [313] Old recording techniques...
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2000 01:37:29 -0500
What impresses me is the attention to Detail.
Derrick would would actually Splice peices of tape and
insert it backwards to give it that backspin sound. If you've worked
with
Linear
I think you really put your finger on something, Steve. There *is*
something between the sounds in analog that is missing in newer digital
recordings. Even listening to old 1930s jazz or gospel type recordings,
there seems to be something else there. The sound is sometimes terrible,
but other
15 matches
Mail list logo
