Did someone else already mention that this NYT article on 80s revivalism
is actually by our old friend Simon Reynolds?
Once again:
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/05/05/arts/music/05REYN.html
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Speaking of back to the future. I will be attending a show at Emo's here
in Austin, TX on wednesday to see The Faint. It's bizarre to see things
like this rehashed in such twisted ways. Anyone ever seen them live? I've
been looking forward to it for awhile now.
-Aaron
On Mon, 6 May 2002, Fred
is Detroit Techno® still
music of and for the future or is it now considered retro to make
Detroit
style techno? has the future envisoned by the original Detroit Techno®
generation passed us by?
Some irony:
In '88 or '89, the Face did a map of house music and its various
subgenres. For Detroit
well i must say its an intersti`n argu,ent you have here.
i also miss the old sounds of the past. but AFAIK even if u try very
much you still have the notion of what happend inside you. i guess u use
different recording and production devices. you make something else.
things (like techno) has
i'm on my way to star clipper comics to take advantage of free comic book
day (and also to pick up volume one of lone wolf and cub...was reminded to
do so by lone wolf's appearance on samurai jack), banging IT IS WHAT IT IS
from my minivan (i know i know...no minivan jokes). and i'm thinking that
In my ongoing way of capitalising on the Eminem thing, I was thinking of
alarm clocks with 'Wake Up - It's Techno!' on them. It would good if you
could get it to play Purposemaker's Alarm too. You could give them away at
the DEMF. Of course the alarm clocks would have to be super slick in design
made by ford? :P
-Joe
fux
www.emmrecords.com/teh_fux
- Original Message -
From: Cyclone Wehner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 313 Detroit 313@hyperreal.org
Sent: Sunday, May 05, 2002 11:48 AM
Subject: Re: [313] back to the future
In my ongoing way of capitalising on the Eminem thing, I
@hyperreal.org 313@hyperreal.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 04 May 2002 23:02
Subject: Re: [313] back to the future
I don't think that Detroit Techno (I'm not sure how to do that little
registered mark so this will have to do) has been surpassed by the
future. I do believe
@hyperreal.org 313@hyperreal.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 04 May 2002 23:02
Subject: Re: [313] back to the future
I don't think that Detroit Techno (I'm not sure how to do that little
registered mark so this will have to do) has been surpassed by the
future. I do believe
for the repeat
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 313@hyperreal.org 313@hyperreal.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 04 May 2002 23:02
Subject: Re: [313] back to the future
I don't think that Detroit Techno
that reminds me of the question I wanted to ask Jeff Mills at the
Submerge/Metropolis showing (but unfortunately the QA period was dominated
by some clown with a big mouth and small brain): is Detroit Techno® still
music of and for the future or is it now considered retro to make Detroit
style
oops! almost forgot: Spiderman rules! tee hee
youve been a lovely audience. thank you. goodnight.
sean deason
sean deason wrote:
that reminds me of the question I wanted to ask Jeff Mills at the
Submerge/Metropolis showing (but unfortunately the QA period was dominated
by some clown with a
www.emmrecords.com/teh_fux
- Original Message -
From: sean deason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 313@hyperreal.org
Sent: Saturday, May 04, 2002 3:44 PM
Subject: [313] back to the future
that reminds me of the question I wanted to ask Jeff Mills at the
Submerge/Metropolis showing
Saturday, May 04, 2002, 12:44:12 PM, a knob was tweaked and out came:
sd that reminds me of the question I wanted to ask Jeff Mills at the
sd Submerge/Metropolis showing (but unfortunately the QA period was dominated
sd by some clown with a big mouth and small brain): is Detroit Techno® still
sd
- Original Message -
From: sean deason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 313@hyperreal.org
Sent: Saturday, May 04, 2002 3:44 PM
Subject: [313] back to the future
that reminds me of the question I wanted to ask Jeff Mills at the
Submerge/Metropolis showing (but unfortunately
]
.netcc: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: [313] back to the
future
I think the audience for techno in the US is aging. The younger demographic
groups have different things on their minds. Of course techno has always
been something people have to seek out to really appreciate. If techno
was really marketed, the way Christina and Justin and Britney and Sheryl
are
17 matches
Mail list logo
