i want some slower techno tracks aswell,
100 bpm techno like drexciya's 'davey jones' locker'
but i also want more 140-150 bpm house/techno (not just looped bangers)
and i want more 110-120 bpm hiphop!!
hiphop has gone through the opposite development techno has.
most of the early hiphop was arou
Kamal, you have put your finger exactly on my two favourite two bits
of going out:
1. The bit late on when all the tossers/lifestyle choice clubbers
have buggered off, the djs stop trying ot show off and everyone
achieves a state of exalted calm/melancholic euphoria
2. The post club dissecti
Fu*k
-8
I'll have to slow it down some more for you all..
On another note I am looking to get out some more this summer with a
Laptop PA.
So anybody and everybody that has anything to do with setting up gig's
or club nights give a shout out to me if you would be interested in
having me com
MrVMax>130 to 138 is nice as well and this is coming from a cat that played
>and wrote tracks at 145 up to 150.
teehee.
your new thing on frustrated funk got played at our club the other week at
about -8.
it sounded f**king dope as well.
top shizzle.
__
On Mar 24, 2005, at 12:11, Andrew Duke Cognition Audioworks wrote:
if
i get past 130 it is a rarity. maybe i'm just gittin' old?! :)
I remember a saying " if it's to loud your to old" now it is going to
be " if it's to fast your to old"
130 to 138 is nice as well and this is coming from
That sortof tempo is just so great to dance to, so sexy.
I still love it well fast every now and again but slower
is mhm.
I'll sign too! : )
On Thursday, Mar 24, 2005, at 17:21 Europe/London, Thomas D. Cox, Jr.
wrote:
ill sign that petition too. since im playing lots and lots of old
i remember this one pa i did a few years back where i was the last
on a long bill (so it was like 7am-ish by the time i finished). i played
for about 90 minutes (starting around 5:30am), starting out with techno
and mellowing it
out (quite well, imo) to end the night. there were just a few kids
cc
Subject
Re: (31
At 12:04 PM 3/24/2005, fab. wrote:
not to plug, but that's what were are trying to achieve with our
label...so you can sign me and claudio up too :P
and that's a very good job you do I might add.
--
unsigned short int to_yer_mama;
matt kane's brain
http://www.hydrogenproject.com
[EMAIL PROTECTE
ill sign that petition too. since im playing lots and lots of old
records when i play these days, i rarely even get above 120. its
usually more like 115 or so. thats the best tempo IMO, so much
stuff can fit in the mix.
tom
-- Original Message --
From: An
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JT>yeah i think a lot of early techno was real slow,
NEW CAMPAIGN.
"Make techno slow again"
i'd sign. i did a live pa in toronto friday night and the dj
on before me, by halfway through his set the tempo was
so high i actually said to the promoter--"uh, i sure hop
TED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 6:03 PM
Subject: Re: (313) Slowing down (was Stasis)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JT>yeah i think a lot of early techno was real slow,
NEW CAMPAIGN.
"Make tech
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JT>yeah i think a lot of early techno was real slow,
NEW CAMPAIGN.
"Make techno slow again"
Sign below kids:
robin
anyone else?
:)
robin...
They are playing in Sheffield this weekend, I'll say hello from you...
On 24 Mar 2005, at 16:54, Stoddard, Kamal wrote:
only the groovers left and the tempos
drop. my experience of this is with DiY and Smokescreen free
parties in Derbyshire quarries where house music is the order
of the da
> only the groovers left and the tempos
> drop. my experience of this is with DiY and Smokescreen free
> parties in Derbyshire quarries where house music is the order
> of the day, but i suspect the effect of the tempo is the same.
>
> robin...
>
Awww yeah! The DIY crew knew whats up
; Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 11:26 AM
> To: Stoddard, Kamal
> Subject: RE: (313) Slowing down (was Stasis)
>
>
>
>
>
> >get Jim to do a mix
>
> please do - I'd like to hear what you're trying to describe.
> I think I know what you're t
JT>yeah i think a lot of early techno was real slow,
NEW CAMPAIGN.
"Make techno slow again"
Sign below kids:
np> catnip. screeech. I
*heart* patrick russell.
_
-
>We were on typical Sunday morning after status (treats still in the
bloodstream, wine in a glass, 7:30 am, shades >on, in a lawn chair on the
patio
owww boy.
I'm sat here laughing my ass off.
on the 'lawn' old boy? whatto whatto?
: )
teehee.
__
From: "J.T." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Stoddard,Kamal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'robin'"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 4:28 PM
Subject: RE: (313) Slowing down (was Stasis)
> yeah i th
yeah i think a lot of early techno was real slow, maybe cus it was just an
offshoot of house anyways...
maybe it's coming fullcircle again now, people want to mix techno and house
together again, at least i do, they're becoming less distinct from each other
again...
some of my alltime favorite s
Stoddard, Kamal wrote:
I don't really remember when faster tempo's took over or became as much of a
deal. I remember older electro (we called it bootyshake music down here). Like
hip hop be bop is hecka slow. Most older house used to be pretty slow. Secret
tapes of dr eich I remember being pre
ng about? Maybe
I'll get Jim to do a mix.
Kamal K. Stoddard
Turner Broadcasting Systems
> -Original Message-
> From: robin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 10:54 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: 313@hyperreal.org
> Subject: Re: (3
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i think there's a move to lower bpms generally. i only say this cos i
like it like that. :)
nah.
you just dont go to any mad techno clubs anymore I reckon.
thats all.
hmm yeah you're right. i don't.
fast bpms, a bit old hat tho init?
*dons flameproof dressing
>i think there's a move to lower bpms generally. i only say this cos i
>like it like that. :)
nah.
you just dont go to any mad techno clubs anymore I reckon.
thats all.
_
- End of message text --
Subject
Re: (313) Slowing down (was Stasis
i've been digging even lower bpms lately (normally i can't cope with
anything over 130 :) , old age and creaking bones or somat)
i think there's a move to lower bpms generally. i only say this cos i
like it like that. :)
like calling sensible speed techno electro-house...all wrong init...
>funny you should mention that - I've noticed that most of the music I've
>been buying lately and playing has been slower tempo.
It's called gettin' old Mike.
: )
or getting all cosmic innit.
_
- End of message
27 matches
Mail list logo
