rosea grammostola wrote:
> Daniel James wrote:
>> Hi Rosea,
>>
>>> Was/is it the plan to wait so long with the 3.0 release?
>> No, but then commercial projects have had to take priority. In the
>> meantime we have had some new upstream releases of core application
>> packages, which make the new
Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 18 Sep 2009, Robin Gareus wrote:
>>>
>>> [OT] Where can I find the multimedia kernel for Debian and it's headers?
>>> I tried the 64studio debian lenny backport but can't find the kernel
>>> and
Daniel James wrote:
> Hi Gabriel,
>
>>> 64studio does not provide kernel-headers. Customers are not expected to
>>> compile their own modules.
>
>> They've always been there in the past. Why not now?
>
> I think there's some confusion there. I think what Robin means is that
> our commercial pro
rosea grammostola wrote:
> Robin Gareus wrote:
>> rosea grammostola wrote:
>>
>>> Robin Gareus wrote:
>>>
>>>> rosea grammostola wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Daniel James wrote:
>>>>>
>>>
rosea grammostola wrote:
> Robin Gareus wrote:
>> rosea grammostola wrote:
>>
>>> Daniel James wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Rosea,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Was/is it the plan to wait so long with the 3.0 release?
&g
[...snip...]
>>> [OT] Where can I find the multimedia kernel for Debian and it's
>>> headers? I tried the 64studio debian lenny backport but can't find
>>> the kernel and headers
>>>
>>>
>> 64studio does not provide kernel-headers. Customers are no
Leo wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 6:24 AM, Robin Gareus wrote:
>> If you want to help with some testing, you can preview the upcoming
>> kernel update (will be released on 64studio sometime next week):
>>
>> http://rg42.org/_media/wiki/kernel/linux-image-2.6.31-rt10-
Jonathan E. Brickman wrote:
>> 64studio does not provide kernel-headers. Customers are not expected to
>> compile their own modules.
>>
> Customers are expected to accept an inability to compile their own
> modules? Why?
To not get them distracted or sidetracked from making Music :-)
As al
rosea grammostola wrote:
> rosea grammostola wrote:
>> Robin Gareus wrote:
[..snip..]
>>>>>> BTW First test result of your kernel
>>>>>> kernel panic - not syncing VFS unable to mount root fs on
>>>>>> unknown-block
>>>&
Hi Rosea,
rosea grammostola wrote:
> Robin Gareus wrote:
>> rosea grammostola wrote:
>>
>>> rosea grammostola wrote:
>>>
>>>> Robin Gareus wrote:
>>>>
>> [..snip..]
>>
>>
>>>>>>>>
rosea grammostola wrote:
> Robin Gareus wrote:
>> Hi Rosea,
>>
>> rosea grammostola wrote:
>>
>>> Robin Gareus wrote:
>>>
>>>> rosea grammostola wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
&
Hi there,
I've just uploaded a linux 2.6.31-rt11 kernel to the 64studio
repositories. It's targeted for Intel Core Duo and Atom CPUs and will be
the default kernel for the Indamixx distribution!
It's available from the
deb http://apt.64studio.com/backports jaunty-backports main
repository via
Dave Robinson wrote:
> Robin Gareus wrote:
>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I've just uploaded a linux 2.6.31-rt11 kernel to the 64studio
>> repositories. It's targeted for Intel Core Duo and Atom CPUs and will be
>> the default kernel for the Indamixx distrib
rosea grammostola wrote:
> Robin Gareus wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I've just uploaded a linux 2.6.31-rt11 kernel to the 64studio
>> repositories. It's targeted for Intel Core Duo and Atom CPUs
> What if you have a pentium 4 (single core)?
It works ok for
Jonathan E. Brickman wrote:
> rosea grammostola wrote:
>> Daniel James wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Quentin, hi Rosea,
>>>
>>>
> Where do you need the sources for?
>
Testing, mostly.
>>> And also we provide source for all packages to meet our obligations as
>>> distri
Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
>> Od: Robin Gareus
>
>> I've just uploaded a linux 2.6.31-rt11 kernel to the 64studio
>> repositories. It's targeted for Intel Core Duo and Atom CPUs and will be
>> the default kernel for the Indamixx distribution!
>>
>
Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
>>>> Od: Robin Gareus
>
> RG> I've just uploaded a linux 2.6.31-rt11 kernel to the 64studio
>
> RG> repositories. It's targeted for Intel Core Duo and Atom CPUs and will be
>
> RG> the default kernel for the Indamixx di
rosea grammostola wrote:
> rosea grammostola wrote:
>> Robin Gareus wrote:
>>> Hi there,
>>>
>>> I've just uploaded a linux 2.6.31-rt11 kernel to the 64studio
>>> repositories. It's targeted for Intel Core Duo and Atom CPUs
>> What if
-jonathan
>
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Robin Gareus wrote:
>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I've just uploaded a linux 2.6.31-rt11 kernel to the 64studio
>> repositories. It's targeted for Intel Core Duo and Atom CPUs and will be
>> the default kern
rosea grammostola wrote:
> Robin Gareus wrote:
>> rosea grammostola wrote:
>>
>>> rosea grammostola wrote:
>>>
>>>> Robin Gareus wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi there,
>>>>>
>>>>> I've ju
rosea grammostola wrote:
> [..]
>
> I think he doesn't touch a Linux system anymore at least in the coming
> two years...
Well, he should have checked if the hardware is supported before buying
the laptop..
> To much waste of time for him and he finds Linux audio not user friendly
> enough.
.
Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
>> Od: Robin Gareus
>
>>
>
> RG> [optionally] start `sudo latencytop`
>
> Hi,
>
> I having this here:
>
>
> $ sudo latencytop
> Please enable the CONFIG_LA
Hi Jonathan,
Jonathan E. Brickman wrote:
> Well, Gustin, I'm not sure what distro you're advising me on, but it's not
> 64studio 3b3 :-) There is no /etc/init.d/NetworkManager at all.
I have not tried 64studio 3b3 yet, but on recent debian it's called
/etc/init.d/network-manager
Anyways `sudo
Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried linux-image-2.6.31-1-multimedia-amd64 for jaunty-backports
> repo, but but got this on install:
>
> E: linux-image-2.6.31-1-multimedia-amd64: subprocess installed
> post-installation script returned error exit status 2
Could you be more specific and post th
Hi Jonathan,
Since iwconfig, and iwlist work, this really looks like a bug with
network-manager.
64studio is based on Ubuntu Hardy, which is why you get version 0.6.6.
I've filed a ticket to backport nm-0.7.1 to 64studio
( http://trac.64studio.com/64studio/ticket/515 ) but it would be great
to k
Hi Jaromir,
Thanks for reporting. OOPS; it's my bad again. I forgot to remove the
"-rt11" on the AMD64 build-host..
linux-image-2.6.31-2-multimedia-amd64 is up. please try again. I'll keep
my fingers crossed.
robin
Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
>> Od: Robin Gareus
>
>
Hi Leo,
Leo wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 8:39 AM, Robin Gareus wrote:
>> linux-image-2.6.31-2-multimedia-amd64 is up. please try again. I'll keep
>> my fingers crossed.
>
> I'm testing this on Karmic (fresh installed alpha 6 and yesterday
> upgraded to be
Gustin Johnson wrote:
> Michael Jarosch wrote:
>> Am Donnerstag, den 01.10.2009, 19:49 +0200 schrieb Michael Jarosch:
>>> Am Donnerstag, den 01.10.2009, 17:39 +0200 schrieb Robin Gareus:
>>>
>>>> Thanks for reporting. OOPS; it's my bad again. I forgot t
Hi Ralf, Hi Mitsch,
I wish you guys would not x-post messages from the developer list and
forward them to the users list. In particular for topics that are still
being tested and not ready for end-users, yet.
That being said,
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Robin Gareus wrote:
>> Ralf Mard
Jonathan E. Brickman wrote:
>
>> Could you try to compile and test it on your machine?
>>
>> Try sth. like this:
>> -8<
>> sudo apt-get install build-essential fakeroot
>> sudo apt-get build-dep network-manager
>> cd /tmp
>> wget http://rg42.org/_media/wiki/nm-0.7.1-debian.tgz
>> tar xvzf
Jonathan E. Brickman wrote:
> linuxsampler.org is down, and I need the sources for the backend.
> Anyone got them?
http://apt.64studio.com/backports/pool/main/l/linuxsampler/linuxsampler_1.0.0.orig.tar.gz
from 3 Aug 2009
You can also try google-cache or maybe someone cloned it on github.
__
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Hi Daniel :)
>
>> EXT4 file system by default
>>
>
> When Suse made it default a long time ago I avoided to use ext4after
> make inquiries. I can't remember the reasons anymore, but there were
> some issues not to use ext4. Is ext4 without any disadvantages now
yes, t
Daniel James wrote:
> Hi Ralf, hi Robin,
>
>>> Are there packages for proprietary NVIDIA drivers
>> I did not follow recent discussions to on that subject too closely, but
>> IIRC 64studio won't provide _any_ packages with proprietary software.
>
> Proprietary drivers are just too much trouble.
On 11/07/2009 03:21 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Hi :)
> [..]
> Someone on LAD asked what timer preferred to use for sequencing. Because
> of this happy coincidence I found out, that for the default 64 Studio
> 3.0-beta3 kernel the module snd-hrtimer isn't loaded and in addition
> that there isn't
On 02/17/2012 12:28 AM, Mike Holstein wrote:
> is this debian based? JACK2? what repos? who maintains the packages?
OpenDAW is debian/squeeze based. Basically all that OpenDAW adds is a
few backports from wheezy+sid. The 64studio packaging team (Daniel,
Alessio, Free and me) moved on to directly
35 matches
Mail list logo
