Re: [AI] Draft policy for exams urgent

2007-11-28 Thread Vetrivel Adhimoolam
Hello Kanchan, It is certainly a well drafted policy. It pretty much covers everything. But a couple of suggestions though: The policy also should include sufficient guidelines describing what should be done in the event of certain delays as the result of computer problems or the malfunctioning

Re: [AI] Draft policy for exams urgent

2007-11-28 Thread Ketan Kothari
Dear Kanchan, It is an excellent document except that there should be a provision for viva exam in certain cases where the use of graphs is immense and those of us who are totally blind by birth find it difficult to read them. Further, after this policy comes into effect the nonimplementing body

Re: [AI] Draft policy for exams urgent

2007-11-28 Thread Subramani L
someone takes the cue. Warm rgds, Subramani -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vetrivel Adhimoolam Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 8:56 AM To: pamnani; accessindia@accessindia.org.in Subject: Re: [AI] Draft policy for exams urgent Hello

Re: [AI] Draft policy for exams urgent

2007-11-28 Thread nafisa buhariwala
Well drafted Kanchan. Seems to cover all points.Only a small modification as regards Screen Readers. Mention JAWS or any other screen reading software the candidate is comfortable with. If they get stuck to the word JAWS and not allow Window Eyes someone like me will be miserable. Nafisa> Date:

Re: [AI] Draft policy for exams urgent

2007-11-28 Thread Pamnani
IL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 10:58 AM Subject: Re: [AI] Draft policy for exams urgent > Hai Kanchan: > > Your work is certainly commendable. In fact, I was also thinking on the > same lines as Vetri as I was going through the draft and perhaps, if > there

Re: [AI] Draft policy for exams urgent

2007-11-28 Thread sweety bhalla
TED]> To: pamnani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sent: 29/11/2007 8:56 AM Subject: Re: [AI] Draft policy for exams urgent > Hello Kanchan, > > It is certainly a well drafted policy. It pretty much covers everything. But > a couple of suggestions though: The policy also should include

Re: [AI] Draft policy for exams urgent

2007-11-28 Thread Dinesh Kaushal
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pranav Lal Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 12:45 PM To: 'pamnani'; accessindia@accessindia.org.in Subject: Re: [AI] Draft policy for exams urgent Kanchan, 1. Why specify the software that is to be used? A person could be

Re: [AI] Draft policy for exams urgent

2007-11-28 Thread Pamnani
& Solicitor 9, Suleman Chambers, Battery Street, Colaba, Mumbai - 400 039. - Original Message - From: "sweety bhalla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 12:30 PM Subject: Re: [AI] Draft policy for exams urgent > Moreover the scr

Re: [AI] Draft policy for exams urgent

2007-11-28 Thread Pranav Lal
Kanchan, 1. Why specify the software that is to be used? A person could be comfortable in writing an exam even in an application like Open office. 2. Why copy and paste from Pagemaker? This could create a problem with tables. Ideally, question papers should be Microsoft Office documents such that

Re: [AI] Draft policy for exams urgent

2007-11-28 Thread AMIT BHATT
gt; - Original Message - > From: Vetrivel Adhimoolam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: pamnani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > Sent: 29/11/2007 8:56 AM > Subject: Re: [AI] Draft policy for exams urgent > > > Hello Kanchan, > > > > It is certainly a well drafted pol

Re: [AI] Draft policy for exams urgent

2007-11-28 Thread Pamnani
ovember 29, 2007 8:56 AM Subject: Re: [AI] Draft policy for exams urgent > Hello Kanchan, > > It is certainly a well drafted policy. It pretty much covers everything. > But > a couple of suggestions though: The policy also should include sufficient > guidelines describing what sho

Re: [AI] Draft policy for exams urgent

2007-11-28 Thread Pamnani
" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "pamnani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 10:22 AM Subject: Re: [AI] Draft policy for exams urgent > Dear Kanchan, > > It is an excellent document except that there should be a provision > for viva exam in cert

Re: [AI] Draft policy for exams urgent

2007-11-28 Thread Amiyo Biswas
"Ketan Kothari" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "pamnani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 10:22 AM > Subject: Re: [AI] Draft policy for exams urgent > > > To unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the subject unsubscri

Re: [AI] Draft policy for exams urgent

2007-11-28 Thread Rajesh Asudani
D] On Behalf Of ointsno. 3 and Pranav Lal Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 12:45 PM To: 'pamnani'; accessindia@accessindia.org.in Subject: Re: [AI] Draft policy for exams urgent Kanchan, 1. Why specify the software that is to be used? A person could be comfortable in writing an

Re: [AI] Draft policy for exams urgent

2007-11-29 Thread Abdul Razique Khan
AMIT BHATT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 1:15 PM Subject: Re: [AI] Draft policy for exams urgent > In my opinion, when scribe is one level junior than the applicant, > deciding > the marks in percentage for writer seems illogical to me. > Specially,

Re: [AI] Draft policy for exams urgent

2007-11-29 Thread sweety bhalla
Kanchan! If a person brings his/her own scribe, then there is no question of percentage? It means. PL clarify. Regards - Original Message - From: Pamnani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: 29/11/2007 12:59 PM Subject: Re: [AI] Draft policy for exams urgent > Sweety my dear the 5

Re: [AI] Draft policy for exams urgent

2007-11-29 Thread Dinesh Kaushal
Hi Kanchan, For most of the points, my view is same as others, that specifics of software may be avoided, but I can imagine a senario where a particular software is used and is not screen reader friendly, so may be these policies may include list of software with a condition that only accessible s

Re: [AI] Draft policy for exams urgent

2007-11-29 Thread Anshul Kapoor
@accessindia.org.in Subject: Re: [AI] Draft policy for exams urgent Kanchan! If a person brings his/her own scribe, then there is no question of percentage? It means. PL clarify. Regards - Original Message - From: Pamnani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: 29/11/2007 12:59 PM Subject: R

Re: [AI] Draft policy for exams urgent

2007-11-29 Thread Pranav Lal
ssage- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pranav Lal Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 12:45 PM To: 'pamnani'; accessindia@accessindia.org.in Subject: Re: [AI] Draft policy for exams urgent Kanchan, 1. Why specify the software that is to be used? A person could be

Re: [AI] Draft policy for exams urgent

2007-11-29 Thread Prof. S. R. Mittal
10:22 AM Subject: Re: [AI] Draft policy for exams urgent > Dear Kanchan, > > It is an excellent document except that there should be a provision > for viva exam in certain cases where the use of graphs is immense and > those of us who are totally blind by birth find it difficult to re

Re: [AI] Draft policy for exams urgent

2007-11-29 Thread Vetrivel Adhimoolam
007 2:51 AM Subject: Re: [AI] Draft policy for exams urgent points 30 minutes in pranav's mail are, in my opinion, too demanding and far fetched. We should not demand something apparently beyond reasonable. Rajesh and7 regarding scribe not being junior and extra time of 3 -Origin

Re: [AI] Draft policy for exams urgent

2007-11-29 Thread Dr. Rohit Trivedi
no such barrier should be there. - Original Message - From: "sweety bhalla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 12:30 PM Subject: Re: [AI] Draft policy for exams urgent > Moreover the scribe with 55 % marks for examinations, it is very difficu

Re: [AI] Draft policy for exams urgent

2007-11-29 Thread Dr. Rohit Trivedi
: "nafisa buhariwala" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 11:16 AM Subject: Re: [AI] Draft policy for exams urgent > > Well drafted Kanchan. Seems to cover all points.Only a small modification > as regards Screen Readers. Mention JAWS or any other s

Re: [AI] Draft policy for exams urgent

2007-11-29 Thread Dr. Rohit Trivedi
Use of lap tops could be recommended may be with usb querty key board if the candidate is not comfortable with laptop layout - Original Message - From: "Pamnani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 12:53 PM Subject: Re: [AI] Draft policy for exams

Re: [AI] Draft policy for exams urgent

2007-11-29 Thread Dr. Rohit Trivedi
The examinee may be allowed to bring his own screen reading /magnification software Rohit - Original Message - From: "Abdul Razique Khan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 2:04 PM Subject: Re: [AI] Draft policy for exams urgent > Hello kan

Re: [AI] Draft policy for exams urgent

2007-11-29 Thread Manish Agrawal
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dr. Rohit Trivedi Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 12:55 PM To: accessindia@accessindia.org.in Subject: Re: [AI] Draft policy for exams urgent The examinee may be allowed to bring his own screen reading /magnification software Rohit - Original Message - From: &qu

Re: [AI] Draft policy for exams urgent

2007-12-02 Thread mahendra
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: >Sent: 29/11/2007 12:59 PM >Subject: Re: [AI] Draft policy for exams urgent > > > > Sweety my dear the 55% is not for your scribe but only for the scribe > > provided by the Authority. Your Scribe is covered in clause 3 and then if > &g

Re: [AI] Draft policy for exams urgent

2007-12-08 Thread Rohiet A. Patil
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 12:53 PM Subject: Re: [AI] Draft policy for exams urgent > Vetry I have taken the suggestion of the talking calculator as point d. in > clause 8 > the first point of computer malfunction I dont know what to do about it. > I have mentioned the UPS and the

Re: [AI] Draft policy for exams urgent

2007-12-10 Thread pamnani
Sorry was travelling. 9821013644 preferably after 9pm. Kanchan - Original Message - From: "Rohiet A. Patil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2007 23:15 Subject: Re: [AI] Draft policy for exams urgent > dear kanchan madum! > I would like to ta