RE: [ActiveDir] Lock down server not in a domain using GPO

2005-06-21 Thread Adams, Kenneth W \(Ken\)
Title: Message You can set the policy permissions to allow the local administrator account to read but not apply the policy.  Or, you can do what we do and create a special local account for policy administration and set that special account to read and not apply the policy. Ken Adams

RE: [ActiveDir] OT-Data ACLing

2005-06-01 Thread Adams, Kenneth W \(Ken\)
There is a built-in utility called cacls that can do this for you. Another utility is a commercial product called Security Explorer by Small Wonders Software. Ken Adams -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Parris Sent: Wednesday, June 01

RE: [ActiveDir] Recovery console

2005-04-11 Thread Adams, Kenneth W \(Ken\)
The recovery console already has the special drivers for the raid array while booting from the CD to do a repair does not (in those cases where the raid controller drivers are not part of the default Windows 2000 distribution CD). To add the raid controller drivers while booting from the CD, you h

RE: [ActiveDir] Extremely Weird Problem

2005-04-07 Thread Adams, Kenneth W \(Ken\)
ult Domain Controllers. On 3 people are domain admins in the domain and I’m the only one at work.   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adams, Kenneth W (Ken)Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 9:02 AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Extremely Weir

RE: [ActiveDir] Extremely Weird Problem

2005-04-07 Thread Adams, Kenneth W \(Ken\)
Title: Message Have you checked for a higher level GPO that may have these settings configured the way they are changing back to?  My only other thought would be another person with permission to change the policy is changing it back. Ken Adams -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTE

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 5.5 to 2003 Migration Plan

2005-04-06 Thread Adams, Kenneth W \(Ken\)
Have you looked on the Microsoft web for this type of project plan? I think they have some of these already, but I've not looked for any (don't need them at this time). Ken Adams -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carerros, Charles Sent: We

RE: [ActiveDir] Privileged Service Accounts

2005-04-06 Thread Adams, Kenneth W \(Ken\)
rvice AccountsThanks Ken. We've done that with some of the accounts, but (for example) one of these accounts is for our own software distribution agent that runs on almost all our clients. rb "Adams, Kenneth W \(Ken\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: [EMAIL PR

RE: [ActiveDir] time sync script

2005-04-05 Thread Adams, Kenneth W \(Ken\)
If you're talking about a script that runs on the client machines, then just use the 'net time' command in a logon script. Ken Adams -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Brown Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 2:20 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activ

RE: [ActiveDir] Privileged Service Accounts

2005-04-05 Thread Adams, Kenneth W \(Ken\)
Title: Message What about setting the properties of these accounts to allow logon to only the machines you specify?  There is a way in the properties of each account to specify the machines the accounts can logon to.  The number of machine names you can specify is limited, so you will need t

RE: [ActiveDir] DNS and site coverage behaviour

2005-03-03 Thread Adams, Kenneth W \(Ken\)
Title: Message My understanding of sites is that each site must have at least one DC.  If my understanding is correct, your planned action to decomm the Site B DC would lead to the removal of Site B and its incorporation into Site A.  As long as the computers in Site B have the proper DNS se

RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange 5.5

2005-02-17 Thread Adams, Kenneth W \(Ken\)
Title: Message IIRC, IF the folders have been replicated to another Exchange 5.5 server, you can specify the home server on that other server.  I had that happen to me years ago, so I'm not positive about the procedure. Ken Adams -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[E

RE: [ActiveDir] Strange Issue

2005-02-16 Thread Adams, Kenneth W \(Ken\)
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adams, Kenneth W (Ken) Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 10:47 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Strange Issue Check your policy to determine if these settings are in the Computer or User portion of the GPO. If

RE: [ActiveDir] Strange Issue

2005-02-16 Thread Adams, Kenneth W \(Ken\)
Check your policy to determine if these settings are in the Computer or User portion of the GPO. If they are set in the Computer portion, then the computer in the child domain won't get the policy settings from the parent domain. You would need to set the same policy items in the child domain's G

RE: [ActiveDir] Newbie Q: Computer accounts

2005-02-15 Thread Adams, Kenneth W \(Ken\)
When you add a computer to an AD domain, the default location for the computer's account is the 'Computer' OU (unless the computer is a domain controller). If you have OUs for computers to organize them (i.e., production workstations, office workstations), you need to add the computer accounts to

RE: [ActiveDir] Push GPO's to become Local Policies

2005-01-19 Thread Adams, Kenneth W \(Ken\)
Title: Message I would suggest creating a local security policy template with the settings you want, the use a batch file in each machine's user's logon script to apply the policy. Ken Adams -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of EdwinSent

RE: [ActiveDir] Upgrade resources

2005-01-18 Thread Adams, Kenneth W \(Ken\)
The method you propose is actually the method I've heard Microsoft folks suggest. Be sure you update the schema before you promote the first W2K3 server to be a DC. I presume you intended to do that, but did not mention it. Ken Adams -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[

RE: [ActiveDir] What can you *do* with AD??

2004-11-29 Thread Adams, Kenneth W \(Ken\)
With AD and Windows 2000, Windows XP, Windows 2003 Server machines, you can: control client PC settings via Group Policy Objects (GPOs) control server settings via GPOs distribute software via GPOs(see a pattern here with the use of GPOs?) have over 1 million obj

RE: [ActiveDir] Give access to Admin shares admin$ without making them Admin

2004-11-29 Thread Adams, Kenneth W \(Ken\)
Does the information the application wants to access have to reside on a DC? If not, move the information to another server and make the service account a member of the server's Administrators group. If you are stuck with the information on the DC, you either need to use a different applicatio

RE: [ActiveDir] Master Browser

2004-11-15 Thread Adams, Kenneth W \(Ken\)
Title: Message To stop this error message, you will need to turn off the Computer Browser service.  The error message is actually an informational message telling you about the browser status of computer CCDC01. Ken Adams -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PRO

RE: [ActiveDir] XP SP2 and AD

2004-11-08 Thread Adams, Kenneth W \(Ken\)
Title: Message Be sure the machine is running XP Professional with SP2.  If it is running XP Home with SP2, it can't join a domain.   Ken Adams -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Za VueSent: Monday, November 08, 2004 1:28 PMTo: [EMAIL

RE: [ActiveDir] Service Pack 2

2004-08-24 Thread Adams, Kenneth W \(Ken\)
Title: Message Installing or not installing Windows XP Service Pack 2 is a matter of personal choice at this time.  Set up a test machine that you don't care about formatting if needed, install Windows XP with SP2, and test your applications, including wireless connectivity.   You need to ma

RE: [ActiveDir] Joining Computers to a Domain

2004-08-24 Thread Adams, Kenneth W \(Ken\)
Title: Message Yes, you can set permissions on individual accounts to permit only adding computers to the domain.  The way I've done it is to set the permissions on the OU that will contain the computers.  Open that OU's properties, go to the Security tab, add the user's ID, then set the per

RE: [ActiveDir] DNS for AD Clients

2004-08-17 Thread Adams, Kenneth W \(Ken\)
You are correct in point 1, but I would use the server's own IP address instead of 127.0.0.1 in point 2. When a client PC makes a DNS request, it sends that request to its primary DNS server. If the primary DNS server is not available, the PC will send the request to its secondary DNS server. Th

RE: [ActiveDir] DNS for AD Clients

2004-08-17 Thread Adams, Kenneth W \(Ken\)
Your DC doesn't have its default gateway pointing to your router, but your PC does? If you point your DC's default gateway to the router, it should be able to forward DNS resolution requests to one of the up-level DNS servers. I'm presuming that your DC is also your DNS server. If my presumption

RE: [ActiveDir] W2K SCHEMA EXTEND

2004-08-10 Thread Adams, Kenneth W \(Ken\)
anything that needed to work with the extended schema could – is that correct?  Or am I reading between the lines?   R/Bill   -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Adams, Kenneth W (Ken)Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 8:52 AMTo: [EMAIL

RE: [ActiveDir] W2K SCHEMA EXTEND

2004-08-10 Thread Adams, Kenneth W \(Ken\)
Title: Message If you read the upgrade documentation for W2K3, you will find that you have to extend the forest schema before you install the first W2K3 DC.  Extend the schema on the empty root domain with the forestprep option, then allow sufficient time for the schema extension to replicat

RE: [ActiveDir] Inplace DC upgrade to 2003 on HP/Compaq hardware?

2004-08-02 Thread Adams, Kenneth W \(Ken\)
Title: Message Personally, I'd go with your alternate option of performing a wipe and load.  That ensures you don't have any inefficiencies carried over from the previous OS.   If you copy the OS and HP Support Pack software onto a networked share, you should be able to perform the installat

RE: [ActiveDir] Renaming The Admin Account

2004-07-22 Thread Adams, Kenneth W \(Ken\)
I'll answer the second question first: When assigning NTFS permissions to resources, I select the local Administrators group and the local System account with Full Control. I then select the appropriate control group or groups, or individual accounts (domain accounts) and set them with the approp

RE: [ActiveDir] Renaming the Administrator account

2004-07-21 Thread Adams, Kenneth W \(Ken\)
Title: Message The standard best practice IS to rename the Administrator account, no matter what level it is (i.e., local Administrator, Domain Administrator).  Yes, there are some programs that refer to the account name.  Those are mostly hacker programs from what I've learned.  You DON'T w

RE: [ActiveDir] Possibly OT: Application Authentication Issues with Win2003

2004-07-08 Thread Adams, Kenneth W \(Ken\)
Title: Message It sounds like you need to change the policy to send unencrypted passwords to down-level / SMB devices.   Kenneth W. (Ken) Adams, MCSA, MCSE -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wright, T. MR NSSBSent: Thursday, July 08, 20

RE: [ActiveDir] Rebuilding a DC/DNS Server

2004-07-08 Thread Adams, Kenneth W \(Ken\)
Title: Message I recommend running dcpromo, then uninstall DNS.  I also recommend checking with the hardware manufacturer first to determine if any updated hardware drivers are available for the system.  Most BSODs are caused by bad hardware drivers, then by bad hardware.   Kenneth W. (Ken)

RE: [ActiveDir] 2 NT4.0 domains to a Forrest

2004-07-08 Thread Adams, Kenneth W \(Ken\)
  So,  if I have this right, I'm going to put the SAP domain in as a child domain of the existing users domain and not a new domain tree?   Therefore, the domain SAP NetBIOS name will be SAP and the accounts will be that of SAP\user or a UPN of the forest like [EMAIL PROTECTED] ?   Thanks  

RE: [ActiveDir] 2 NT4.0 domains to a Forrest

2004-07-08 Thread Adams, Kenneth W \(Ken\)
Title: Message Not knowing all of the details to your current situation, those you provided lead me to recommend having one forest, but 2 domains.  You can upgrade your user domain and have that as your forest root, then upgrade the SAP domain as a new domain in the forest.  With that arrang

RE: [ActiveDir] Test Lab Creation

2004-05-26 Thread Adams, Kenneth W \(Ken\)
Title: Message I've seen some neat things being done with one or a very few machines using Microsoft's Virtual PC or VMWare to simulate many machines.  You could take a few, well configured PCs to emulate your domain while keeping those PCs on an isolated network.   Check out Microsoft's Vi

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Outlook XP SP 3

2004-03-18 Thread Adams, Kenneth W (Ken)
Title: Message Funny you should ask about this at a time when I just encountered it.  The issue is with the security built into Outlook XP.  There is a program that is trying to send e-mail messages using your Outlook client.  If you want this to happen, you allow it on an individual basis,

RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange 2003

2004-03-05 Thread Adams, Kenneth W (Ken)
Title: Message I subscribe to 2 Exchange newsgroups.  Both have good people participating in them and cover any flavor of Exchange.   Try: Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yaho

RE: [ActiveDir] Windows 2003 server corrupting files

2004-03-01 Thread Adams, Kenneth W (Ken)
I read a newsgroup message from the NT group sponsored by Sunbelt. The sender stated file corruption in database files that Microsoft has a fix for but told the sender that it will only release it to Great Plains users. Kenneth W. (Ken) Adams, MCSA, MCSE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

RE: [ActiveDir] Moving Schema Master (continued...)

2004-02-04 Thread Adams, Kenneth W (Ken)
Don't you have a desktop PC that you could temporarily use? If not, you might want to consider moving your internal DC into the DMZ long enough to move the FSMO instead of the other way around. Kenneth W. (Ken) Adams, MCSA, MCSE -Original Message- From: Frank Buechler [mailto:[EMAIL PR

RE: [ActiveDir] More move Schema Master

2004-02-04 Thread Adams, Kenneth W (Ken)
Before doing anything that drastic, check the event logs on both servers. With the server inside the DMZ being behind closed ports, its hidden account password may be out of sync with the DC inside the network. MS has a Knowledge Base article about how to change the hidden machine account passwor

RE: [ActiveDir] Moving Schema Master

2004-02-03 Thread Adams, Kenneth W (Ken)
nge 2000 to Exchange 2003 on the new server.. Maybe IPSec is the solution.. -Original Message- From: Adams, Kenneth W (Ken) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 12:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Moving Schema Master The actual moving the Schem

RE: [ActiveDir] Moving Schema Master

2004-02-03 Thread Adams, Kenneth W (Ken)
ng that machine inside, how long would it take to move the Schema Master role to the second server? Are there any gotchas involved in doing that, then simply placing the machine back in the DMZ? -Original Message----- From: Adams, Kenneth W (Ken) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February

RE: [ActiveDir] Moving Schema Master

2004-02-03 Thread Adams, Kenneth W (Ken)
Either take the current Schema Master out of the DMZ or (shudder) open the appropriate ports through the interior firewall and point them explicitly to the server you want to become the Schema Master. Kenneth W. (Ken) Adams, MCSA, MCSE -Original Message- From: Frank Buechler [mailto:[EM

RE: [ActiveDir] Contents of GC

2004-01-29 Thread Adams, Kenneth W (Ken)
Title: Message Have you tried performing an authoritative restore of DOM_B using a backup from T3?  That should restore all objects to the domain and still keep the GCs in sync.     Kenneth W. (Ken) Adams, MCSA, MCSE -Original Message-From: Jorge de Almeida Pinto [mailto:[EMAIL PRO

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO not being applied

2004-01-13 Thread Adams, Kenneth W (Ken)
User GPOs are applied AFTER machine GPOs IIRC. If the user GPOs set the proxy or home page settings differently than the machine GPO, the user GPO settings will be the effective settings. Kenneth W. (Ken) Adams, MCSA, MCSE -Original Message- From: Bruce Clingaman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE

RE: [ActiveDir] Windows 2003 domain in Windows 2000

2003-10-30 Thread Adams, Kenneth W (Ken)
to upgrade forest domain (ABC.COM) to windows 2003.   I would like to keep Windows 2000 as my forest domain.  Is that going to be an issue?   -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adams, Kenneth W (Ken)Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 1:00 PMT

RE: [ActiveDir] Windows 2003 domain in Windows 2000

2003-10-30 Thread Adams, Kenneth W (Ken)
EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 2:11 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Windows 2003 domain in Windows 2000 How you do upgrade the schema without upgrading the OS?   -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adams, Kenn

RE: [ActiveDir] SUS does SPs now

2003-09-19 Thread Adams, Kenneth W (Ken)
nment, then approval, then deployment to production. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adams, Kenneth W (Ken) Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 11:45 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] SUS does SPs now Not if your SUS server is

RE: [ActiveDir] SUS does SPs now

2003-09-19 Thread Adams, Kenneth W (Ken)
approval in the change management process should be before the update is even deployed -- after testing against applications, services, infrastructure, rollback, etc. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adams, Kenneth W (Ken) Sent: Friday

RE: [ActiveDir] SUS does SPs now

2003-09-19 Thread Adams, Kenneth W (Ken)
I'll be setting up SUS SP updates to servers, only I set my servers to download and notify, not to automatically install and boot. I keep control that way. Ken A., MCSA, MCSE -Original Message- From: Henderson Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 7:13 AM

RE: [ActiveDir] Password change issue

2003-08-08 Thread Adams, Kenneth W (Ken)
IIRC, password changes are part of the normal AD replication. That replication can take a few minutes unless forced. During the logon process, the logically closest DC will attempt to validate the logon. If the client is a down-level client (i.e., Win9X, NT 4.0), the logon process goes to the

RE: [ActiveDir] GP overridden

2003-07-30 Thread Adams, Kenneth W (Ken)
IIRC, the local policy runs no matter what as it is the first policy to be run. If you want to override local policies, you need to set the policies in either the domain, site, or OU. Note that domain based security policies, such as password aging, cannot be overridden by site or OU policies.

RE: [ActiveDir] Disk configuration for 2K DCs

2003-06-18 Thread Adams, Kenneth W (Ken)
Your configuration for Exchange should work very well for your DCs. We have something similar for our DCs (we don't use a separate logical disk for our log files and database, but we should have IMHO). Kenneth W. (Ken) Adams, MCSA, MCSE -Original Message- From: Hughes. Daryn (IT Soluti