Title: RE: [ActiveDir] Sites to restrict traffic,
Yes there is but it is a static option. The option is
MachineObjectOU and can be entered under the [Identification] section of the
ristndrd.sif file.
The better choice may be to use a customized custom.osc if
you have multiple possible OU's
Title: RE: [ActiveDir] Sites to restrict traffic,
For your first question:
Verify these two settings:
1. Open up your ristndrd.sif in \\(RISSERVER)\REMINST\Setup\English\Images\(ImageName)\i386\templates
Under the
[UserData] section there should be a line that reads:
C
http://www.winisp.net/astebner/bin/orca.msi
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of rubix cube
Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2005 4:34 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] Ocra
Hi,
I need Ocra to edit an MSI file, the only way it see
http://tinyurl.com/2qr55
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Noah
EigerSent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 1:34 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: [ActiveDir] Branch Office Guide
Hi –
Am I correct that the most recent AD
Branch Office Guide from Microsof
job security
Yes that would make application deployments much easier
:-)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Crawford,
ScottSent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 4:29 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Using GPO to
install an MSI package
You may want to do a bit of research into RIS Dan, more
specifically the [Components] portion if that is the type of customization you
are referring to.
Here is a URL that I keep handy:
http://tinyurl.com/3p8g9
As for any registry changes, that can be scripted fairly
easily.
Software
Is it safe to assume that RIS is not an
option?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian
DesmondSent: Monday, February 14, 2005 3:44 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Automate
Computer Name Changes
Dan-
You can certainly
script thi
Title: Message
This should help
http://www.google.com/search?q=migrate+NT4+to+2003&sourceid=mozilla-search&start=0&start=0&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary
SmithSent: Thursday, January 13,
Liberum is a nice, free alternative if open-source is an option,
although production on the project has slowed quite a bit over these
past few months the software is still very functional and does meet all
of the requirements that you mentioned.
http://www.liberum.org/
-Original Message
A lot of people have turned away from PestPatrol since CA bought them
out. Also, there has been a lot of discussion over on the Sunbelt lists
about a corporate spyware suite that is approaching its final stages of
development you might want to look into that.
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/
Stu
I'm having trouble
finding any accurate matches by googling so I thought I'd throw it out here in
the mailing list to see what others may have done.
What I'm trying to
do is to create a completely unattended install with 2 seperate machine
images.
Specifically, I
want the standard flat
Yeah I noticed this as well with 1 of my test machines
using SP2. It seems like SP2 might detect an ACPI Power Button device,
while pre-SP2 machines do not.
Go figure :-P
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pelle,
JoeSent: Monday, October 11, 2004 5:08 PMT
Yes I actually already have that KB article open in a
seperate window lol.
Okay thanks for your sugestion Darren. I'll look into
it.
P.S. - Please disregard the other email (gpoguy), you have
already answered it.
Thanks again.
Michael
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
Just so everyone knows, My Documents redirection takes
place on the HKCU hive, so the GPO processing would have to apply to the user
account based on which machine they log onto. Life's a b*tch...
(sometimes)
Moving the computer objects to seperate OU's and
linking seperate GPO's wouldn't
Is anyone aware of any way to force a GPO to
only process for a user on a specific machine?
For
example:
User A logs onto
Machine A and GPO does not apply
User A logs onto
Machine B and GPO applies
Real world
scenario:
User A logs onto
Desktop and Default Domain GPO applies. Roam
3 Windows 2000 machines, neither of
which are the case. For anyone curious here is a
link:
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=305357
Michael
Wassell
Network
Administrator
PT Marketing
Group
Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania 15222
Phone:
412-471-8995 / Fax: 412-471-8695
**This e-mail has
regarding
the symptom, but it only mentions that the symptom occurs in Windows 2000
domains, and pre-SP3 Windows 2000 machines, neither of which are the case.
For anyone curious here is a link:
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=305357
Michael
Wassell
Network
Administrator
PT Marketing
P3 Windows 2000 machines, neither of which are the case.
For anyone curious here is a link:
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=305357
Michael
Wassell
Network
Administrator
PT Marketing Group
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
15222
Phone: 412-471-8995 /
Fax: 412-471-8695
oblem before?
I did find a MSKB
article regarding the symptom, but it only
mentions that the symptom occurs in
Windows 2000 domains, and pre-SP3 Windows 2000
machines, neither of which are the case. For anyone curious here is
a link:
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=305357
Michael
Wa
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;325473
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2004 10:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ActiveDir] OT: DHCP Export
Does anyone know of a way
To expand on what joe said, have you considered using a scheduled task
with encrypted credentials? That's why I referred to the CPAU utility.
Comes in very handy, especially for task repetition, as opposed to
manually executing the task using a remote task execution utility. Also
does not require
Psexec maybe? (Part of the PSTools suite) http://www.sysinternals.com/
CPAU might also come in handy http://www.joeware.net/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Creamer, Mark
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2004 9:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
http://tinyurl.com/an6z maybe?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mulnick, Al
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2004 12:18 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] program to crate reports...
Something like what Ecora does? www.ecora.c
http://www.joeware.net/win32/index.html
CPAU another option possibly?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 10:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Local admin acct
There's a too
Grrr.. Wrapping
http://tinyurl.com/4an3w
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Wassell
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 4:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Disable the download of SP2 ADM files
http
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=8BCE6BBA-EA5D-4
425-89C1-C1CB1CCD463C&displaylang=en
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Shaff
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 4:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ActiveDir] D
The first thing that comes to mind is disabling Windows
Installer for non-managed apps via GPO, considering you are already doing
something similar as you had mentioned that may be the most viable
solution.
Otherwise, I'm not sure if its possible or how difficult it
would be to implement b
Title: Message
Yes that's true also, administration will be a pain but as
long as the scripts do not have to be changed frequently for any reason then you
should just be able to set it and forget it (no pun intended)
;-)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Perdue
Title: Message
I'm sorry in advance I don't mean to be rude, this is
just a suggestion.
I really think that your making this more difficult than it
has to be by querying AD for specific user properties. Is there a
reason why you can't use a simple security group, assign membership accordin
If you want to continue using Kix scripting you can create
security groups and assign the appropriate users to those security groups,
afterwards use the InGroup (Kix) function and assign drive mappings etc.
accordingly
Atleast that's one way of doing
it
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mail
recently in
a lab environment. DNS is left dirty after the process. Sort of a
good/bad thing. Both names can be resolved to the same IP (old/new).
Some cleanup will be in order eventually. Definitely suggest testing in a
lab first.
-Al
-Original
Message-----From: Michael
Wassell
I sent this question
into a friend at Microsoft because it has me completely stumped. I thought
I'd post it here as well to see if anyone else might have an
idea.
I have
a problem that should theoretically have been a simple resolution, but for the
life of me I have not been able to fig
Concern: One of the senior managers bought a
laptop for herself to use as a home PC, as well as bring into the office
regularly to use for convenience purposes.
Problem: The problem was aside from the obvious
security issues involved with doing that, domain-level GPO's which restrict
use
Oddly enough I was JUST looking at that last night before signing off
for the evening :-)
But yes, it does look like a very handy tool.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 7:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
Has anyone managed
to find complete documentation of all of the changes made with Exchange 2003
SP1? The release notes fall short of mentioning exactly what
updates/changes were made although I have looked briefly and there seems to be
more control available to the user through OWA (Option
Hello Chuck;
Microsoft offers guidelines for allowing administrator
access to redirected user folders as mentioned in http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;288991.
In the article it is mentioned not to allow users exclusive access, rather allow
permissions to inherit from
I have a feeling that it has something to do with the
desktop.ini stored within the folder itself because of the
strange behaviour when a user attempts to access the folder as shown on the
the compmgmt snap-in.
I really don't think that it has anything to do with
hardware because of the
The
only events logged are informational success notifications and success audit
security logs I do not see any relevant Warning or Error events logged
:-(
Server specs: 2xPIII 600, 1GB RAM, 2
RAID-1 arrays
The server functions as a file/print server as well as
a DC holding all roles f
d solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom
this e-mail is addressed. If you are not one of the named recipient's or
otherwise have reason to believe that you have received this message in
error, please notify the sender. Any other use, retention,
dissemination, forwarding, print
There is nothing abnormal shown in the event logs
on client or server with any relevance :-(
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mulnick,
AlSent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 11:18 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: explorer.exe
hangs on folder access
Yeah my mistake I was referring to the PERC-II card
;-) I have a PE3200 which has a PERC-II in it.
I managed to get 2k3 installed on it using a MegaRAID 2000
driver (Win2k driver) but I have not managed to obtain a compatible firmware
update yet... maybe some day
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is a very
strange problem I experienced a few weeks ago and just yesterday I've noticed it
happen again. This only happens with a single folder, all others are
fine. This particular instance the folder is completely empty except for
"My Pictures" being automatically created within.
Regarding the PERC 2 issue joe, what was your
resolve?
I have a PERC 2 card in one of the DC's for my test domain
I can't find a compatible firmware update ANYWHERE I could have sworn that the
card was not a PERC 2 at all and I'm all ears to verify that conclusion
:-D
From: [EMAIL PROT
Is anyone aware of a utility that can be used to
extract a message from the Exchange IS using the message ID as the search
criteria (which is visible from the Message
Tracking center)?
I am looking for
a utility similar to Exmerge with the ability to extract a message from the
IS, but whi
Quoted from: http://www.techinterviews.com/index.php?p=12
What hashing algorithms are used in Windows 2003 Server? RSA Data
Security's Message Digest 5 (MD5), produces a 128-bit hash, and the
Secure Hash Algorithm 1 (SHA-1), produces a 160-bit hash.
Maybe that will help
-Original Message-
Just saw these in
another list boys. Thought I'd pass it along.
My apoligies if it
is a double post.
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=838236
http://support.microsoft.com/common/canned.aspx?H=Microsoft%20Exchange%202003%20post-RTM%20Store%20Update&Query=kbExchange2003preSP1fix&CDID=EN-
The short answer would be yes.
I would suggest doing it as a Published Application with an .MST answer
file, as opposed to an Assigned application because my first concern
would be extended log on periods during which users would think they're
computers were hung/not responding and doing "somethi
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 11:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] SUS 2.0 Beta
Yea I did too and I was never able to register. I'm kind of
disappointed.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Wassell
Sent: Thursd
Did anyone else receive an "Unknown Error" when registering for WUS open
beta (during Step 4) or was it just me? :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Creamer, Mark
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 9:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [A
instead of users?
Does that change the behavior at all?
--
Roger D. Seielstad -
MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc.
From: Michael Wassell
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004
10:06 AMTo
the
PF.
--
Roger D. Seielstad -
MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc.
From: Michael Wassell
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004
1:11 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
[Activ
ts at the outset
however.
--
Roger D. Seielstad -
MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc.
From: Michael Wassell
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004
2:55 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
[ActiveDir] Assigned software deployme
Hmm.. the objects do appear in the Preview pane when viewed
from the server.
If that's the case then maybe I'll just wait it out
:-)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 3:41
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [
Okay. I've answered my own
question.
I've imported all of the contact's into AD as contact
objects. I've delegated control of that OU to the managers of the
department and they will be instructed how to access/update information for the
objects in AD.
My question now is, I have created
As a follow up to my own question.
If it is not possible, I suppose I could write
a script that automatically exports the contents of the public folder from
Outlook and store it in a CSV format, import them into the AD
afterwards using CSVDE as Contact objects in a specific OU and query the
I'm not sure if this
is possible or not. I can't seem to find any reference of it
anywhere.
Would anyone care to
enlighten me on if it is possible to populate an address list stored
server-side (similar to GAL) using an LDAP query to query the contents of a
public folder? I know that it
t lets one
enable a variety of GPO logging, including SI. Email me offline and I
can send that to you.
Darren
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Wassell
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 12:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE:
t that was associated to this advertised app, that would kick off
the application installation at that time.
Darren
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Wassell
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 12:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Acti
anyone know?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Wassell
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 3:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Assigned software deployment via GPO
Yes actually I was.
I have done other tests using different m
GPO's support the use of .MST answer files (transforms), there are also
many utilities around that create before/after snapshots and generate an
.MSI package from the installed files (WinINSTALL, Wise Studio etc.), so
there are a lot of ways to get around what's supported "Out-of-the-box"
and what
a GPO
Are you testing it on the same PC in the Production OU that you used in
the Test OU?
-Peter
"Michael Wassell"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]To:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
om>cc:
Okay guys, I am at
my wit's end here
I've been trying to
distribute an .MSI package via GPO as an Assigned application to an OU in
AD.
Test
environment: Worked perfectly fine in my test environment, I
copied the install package to a share on the server, set permissions,
assigned
is, then you could
have an FRS replication problem. You could try manually copying the
registry.pol file from the PDC to the DC that your test workstation is
using and see if that fixes anything.
Darren
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of M
ing accessed from within the folder by the
hung process, but even closing every instance didn't fix the problem.
That was the "Monday surprise".
Sorry. I had to vent.
2 more hours to go ;-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mi
ode Included)
Printers are per-User configurations, not per system wide
in general. Try this as a CLASS USER
--
Roger D. Seielstad
- MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc.
From:
Seielstad -
MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc.
From: Michael Wassell
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004
10:37 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
[ActiveDir] OT: Custom .ADM (Code Included)
In the process of
building a custom .AD
stems Administrator Inovis Inc.
From: Michael Wassell
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004
10:37 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
[ActiveDir] OT: Custom .ADM (Code Included)
In the process of
building a custom .ADM file for controlling specific registry keys.
In the process of
building a custom .ADM file for controlling specific registry keys. The
problem I am having is that it does not seem to be modifying the key when the
GPO is applied/enforced. I've been pulling my hair out all morning I can't
seem to see any reason why this would be happen
old one, isn’t it?
-Original
Message-From: Michael
Wassell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 8:42
AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Released! Windows
Server 2003 Active Directory Branch Office Guide
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=9A4C7AC3-185E-4644-9E98-4876B2A477E7&displaylang=en
I believe this is what you might be looking
for?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael B.
SmithSent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 8:27 AMTo:
[EMAIL PR
In the process of implementing a desktop faxing solution (Esker Fax
specifically) for current production environment. Esker Fax has a
customized form which allows direct interface with the server through
Outlook clients as one of their solutions. The form has the ability to
address a
Okay it looks like I may have found a resolution to my own
question. For whatever reason dynamic updates were not enabled for the
reverse DNS zone, so I've enabled secure only updates for that zone and we'll
see what happens on the next replication.
Again, my apoligies for the double post.
I don't mean to be
rude to anyone. Please excuse the double post, this still has me very
confused so I thought I would repost it for anyone who may not have seen my
previous post this past Friday:
Recently I've done some work for the company
rebuilding the DC's for concerns of naming conv
Recently I've done
some work for the company rebuilding the DC's for concerns of naming conventions
including a "_" character. Everything seems to have gone smoothly with the
exception of 1 thing that I've recently noticed. In the reverse DNS zone
there is a record containing reference to
Title: Folder redirection via GPO
Good morning everyone;
Previously a GPO had been configured to redirect users "My Documents" folders to a network location. This option requires specifying the full UNC path to the server which is to store the data (\\(servername)\(sharename)). As of this
Title: KDC Change
Okay I've resolved my own question. A second domain
controller being present having all FSMO roles transferred means that clients
will continue to be able to authenticate regardless of the fact that the
previous FSMO role holder is demoted. I guess it never hurts to have
Title: KDC Change
I'm in the process of demoting a DC in a Windows 2003 domain which was a roleholder for all FSMO roles. I have moved every role (including GC) to the new DC which is going to be the temporary role holder until the previous DC is rebuilt. Running a dcdiag /v shows that the
Title: Extended Rights
10-4
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rich
MilburnSent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 5:27 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Find and
delete/disable all your old computer acc ounts real easy
test
Rich
Milburn
MCSE,
Mi
ange 2003
Migration Question
Oh okay,
thanks
-Original
Message-From: Michael
Wassell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 1:06
PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange 2003
Migration Question
They were
in 2 seperate domains in 2 seperate fores
of the MX record the
sender used.
-Original
Message-From: Michael
Wassell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 10:29
AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange 2003
Migration Question
I have
used the Exchange 2003 Migration Wizard (bundle
Title: Exchange 2003 Migration Question
I have used the Exchange 2003 Migration Wizard (bundled
with the installation), granted that my migration scenario was Exchange 2000
> Exchange 2003, but I don't suppose there would be much difference as far as
the IS is concerned.
The only dilemma in
Title: Message
Sorry, please ignore my last response. My head was in
another place and I havn't had any coffee yet :-P
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Clay
PerrineSent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 9:19 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Suppress
Title: Message
I don't believe SUS uses a "client" portion, the updates
are automatically distributed to client PC's via administrative shares and
then are executed via RPC. The option not to automatically restart can
also be specified via GPO rather than manually entering a registry value o
I'm sure
this is true, but does the AD Garbage Collection process clean up stale UUID's
left by demoted DC's from replication?
hat Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about Yesterday? -anon
____
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Michael Wassell
Sent: Mon 2/16/2004 7:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ActiveDir] IE6 SP1 MSI Wrapper
As mentioned in:
http://support.microsoft.com/defau
As mentioned
in: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;810011
Does anyone have
another source for this package? I would much prefer downloading the
package through an external source as
opposed to having to jump over
hurdles to get to the right person at
MS.
Following up to my own question, I found this KB article
this morning. Might be good to have on hand for anyone if they were to run
into this sort of situation.
Took alot of digging :-)
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;216359
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAI
This is going to be
hard to explain but I thought I would give it a shot and put it in a
nutshell.
Before I started my
position the previous admin decided to rollout internal software using
GPO. A mistake was made and an attempted rollback was performed. The
GPO was then deleted by the
I think the problem you may be having Phil is that
("ADsPath") may need a value specified. Here is a link from MSDN
explaining the syntax of ADsPath.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url="">
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTE
I believe if you browse through ADSI Edit you will be able
to extract the pre-Win2k login name field and the field you wish to populate
using LDIFDE (Included in the Windows 20/03 ResKit) and change the values in the
exported plain-text file and import afterwards.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[
Not a bad idea... lol
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frank Buechler
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 10:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Moved DC out of DMZ
Speaking of beer.. a sampler platter tonight at Applebee's so
mainly) on winXP workstations, but take
this as an unreliable piece of information.
Please let me know if you need more detailed information. I appreciate your support.
Thanks!!
> -Messaggio originale-
> Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Per conto di Michael
&g
A little bit unclear, but I have browsed through the Microsoft KB
regarding that event id and this article was a match.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;823659
Search in the page for "5723" (without quotes). It is under the
digitally sign communication (always) category.
ction. Doing what, I don't know yet. But I have to
bust a move and make something happen. Worse case, I have the weekend to
recover.
-Original Message-----
From: Michael Wassell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 2:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Active
organization.
Any down time while I recover the thing will be a very_bad_thing.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Wassell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 2:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Moving Schema Master (continued...)
>From what I gat
rnal 2000 DC without it adversely
affecting the server in the DMZ because that server thinks it's been
deleted anyway?
-Original Message-
From: Michael Wassell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 12:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Moving Schema Ma
a 2003 stand-alone server. To do this, I need to prep the
domain for the new 2003 schema, and I need to do this on the 2000 server
acting as the schema master. Maybe I am looking at this wrong. What do
you think?
-Original Message-
From: Michael Wassell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursda
s not supported
with Exchange 2003, but I can't find any literature regarding 2000.
Again, thanks for your help Michael (and everyone!)
-Original Message-----
From: Michael Wassell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 11:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveD
veDir] GPO
explanations
Dead link
Mike
From: Michael Wassell
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004
3:00 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] GPO explanations
Or maybe this one? http://www.ptmarketing.com/PolicySettings.zip
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mai
Or maybe this one? http://www.ptmarketing.com/PolicySettings.zip
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doug
HampshireSent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 1:57 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] GPO
explanations
This what you're looking for?
- Or
100 matches
Mail list logo
