Everyone thanks for all your responses,
they were all very useful.
--Alex
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kamlesh Parmar
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005
12:56 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] AD
Migration Question
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Peter Johnson
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005
9:43 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD
Migration Question
I would, if budget allows, go the second
route. Do the schema upgrade bring up new wind
Exchange Server 2003
Cheers
Jorge
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Peter Johnson
Sent: Mon 10/10/2005 4:43 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD Migration Question
Hi Alex
Get hold of the MS article on upgrading Windows 2000 Ad to
Alborzfard, Alex
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005
10:16 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD
Migration Question
Thanks for the advice! Excuse my
ignorance, but how do I upgrade the schema, while I’m installing the
WIN2K3 server? Ditto for migrating FSMOs.
Does it mean that
DC/GC placements etc and then carry on as in my first mail.
Regards
Peter
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alborzfard, Alex
Sent: 10 October 2005 16:16
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD
Migration Question
Thanks for the
Behalf Of Alborzfard,
AlexPosted At: Monday, October 10, 2005 9:16 AMPosted To:
ActiveDirectoryConversation: [ActiveDir] AD Migration
QuestionSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD Migration
Question
Thanks for the advice!
Excuse my ignorance, but how do I upgrade the schema, while I’m installing the
WIN2
From: "Alborzfard, Alex" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
To:
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD Migration Question
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 10:16:10 -0400
Thanks for the advice! Excuse my ignorance, but how do I upgrade the
schema, while I'm installin
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD Migration Question
Agreed, although you should be careful to note (and take appropriate
actions
for) any apps that utilize hard coded DNS server entries prior to
sunsetting
the original 2K DC.
It's always been a best practice to stand up a new DC vs. upgrade in
10, 2005
9:43 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD
Migration Question
I would, if budget allows, go the second
route. Do the schema upgrade bring up new windows 2003 server. Migrate FSMO
roles to it. Move DNS,WINS etc to the new server and then DCPROMO, one at time
om: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Al Mulnick
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 8:58 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD Migration Question
Agreed, although you should be careful to note (and take appropriate
actions
for) any apps that utilize h
if you need to.
Bob
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Alborzfard,
Alex
*Posted At:* Monday, October 10, 2005 8:26 AM
*Posted To:* ActiveDirectory
*Conversation:* AD Migration Question
*Subject:* [ActiveDir] AD Migration Quest
jm
From: "ActiveDirectory" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
To:
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD Migration Question
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 08:44:10 -0500
My personal opinion is that you carry less crap over if you bring up a
new 2k3 DC (even if only temporarily). Y
: [ActiveDir] AD Migration
Question
I have a W2K AD that I want to migrate to
W2K3 AD. What’s the best option: In-place upgrade of the W2K DC or
standing up a brand new W2K3 DC server
And then upgrade the W2K DC to W2K3?
By the way the W2K DC is also running DNS,
DHCP, & WINS. I have one
,
AlexPosted At: Monday, October 10, 2005 8:26 AMPosted To:
ActiveDirectoryConversation: AD Migration QuestionSubject:
[ActiveDir] AD Migration Question
I have a W2K AD that I want to migrate to
W2K3 AD. What’s the best option: In-place upgrade of the W2K DC or standing up a
brand new W2K3 DC server
I have a W2K AD that I want to migrate to
W2K3 AD. What’s the best option: In-place upgrade of the W2K DC or
standing up a brand new W2K3 DC server
And then upgrade the W2K DC to W2K3?
By the way the W2K DC is also running DNS,
DHCP, & WINS. I have one more DNS server. If I go the s
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Kern
> Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 5:32 PM
> To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
> Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] AD migration
>
> Do you mean check off "associate with external acc
See inline below
Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Kern
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 5:32 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] AD migration
Do you mean check off "associate with external accoun
noun, please
Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bernard, Aric
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 5:03 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD migration
Don't worry Kingslan, I won't hold anything against
7;t hold anything against you! ;) LOL
>
>
>
> "Aric" Bernard
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Kingslan
> Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 2:52 PM
> To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
> Subject: RE:
LOL - I probably would not have this problem if I spelled my first name
"correctly".
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 3:02 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD migratio
Don't worry Kingslan, I won't hold anything against you! ;) LOL
"Aric" Bernard
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Kingslan
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 2:52 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [Act
L PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Kingslan
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 5:52 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD migration
U Well, one - I like simplicity. Two, I'm not a big fan of WINS.
If all we're trying to do is to establish trust for a migration
D]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 4:40 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD migration
I didn't read the entire thread so maybe this is answered but this stuck out
to me, why isn't WINS going to work?
WINS replication
9, 2005 12:07 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD migration
Really, it uses neither. The NetBT is involved, but because we are on (at
present) untrusted domains and forests, WINS isn't going to work.
Typically, this is done with an LMHosts file in the \Drivers\ETC dir
paragraph makes no sense, let me know.
Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Kern
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 3:37 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] AD migration
Sorry, I wasn't trying to be tricky.
I actually
ge-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Kingslan
> Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 9:35 AM
> To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD migration
>
> Tom,
>
> The solution that I gave you is the only one that I kn
gslan
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 9:35 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD migration
Tom,
The solution that I gave you is the only one that I know of. If you are
able to get DNS to work (doubtful) or are able to get WINS to replicate
across a trust that at the pr
t practice' is simply not a
good idea.
Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Kern
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 11:14 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] AD migration
why can't you just use stub zones
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Kern
> Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 5:58 AM
> To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
> Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] AD migration
>
> Sorry to keep harping- but if you have a trust
:58 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] AD migration
Sorry to keep harping- but if you have a trust between a child win2k
domain in one forest with a root or child domain in another forest,
does this use wins or dns.
i know this is not a "real" forest trust and more like
eted your migration and decommissioned old DC's.
> >
> > Jose
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Almeida Pinto,
> > Jorge de
> > Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 2:46 PM
> > T
commissioned old DC's.
>
> Jose
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Almeida Pinto,
> Jorge de
> Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 2:46 PM
> To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org; activedirectory
> Subject: RE: [ActiveD
org; activedirectory
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD migration
What do you mean with "In fact, they are cut off from the root domain
pyhsically. "? Do you mean as in there is not replication between the two
domains? If yes... dare I ask for how long?
As I know of you can migrate the child
CTED] on behalf of Tom Kern
Sent: Mon 8/8/2005 11:08 PM
To: activedirectory
Subject: [ActiveDir] AD migration
I just started working for a company. they used to outsource their
AD/Exchange but now they're trying to get it back.
Its a 2 tree, 2 domain forest. the root domain is empty.
this
n to your new forest where I'm
sure you fully control DNS).
/Guido
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Kern
Sent: Dienstag, 9. August 2005 00:09
To: activedirectory
Subject: [ActiveDir] AD migration
I just started working for a company
I just started working for a company. they used to outsource their
AD/Exchange but now they're trying to get it back.
Its a 2 tree, 2 domain forest. the root domain is empty.
this company only has DA access on the child domain. No EA access. In
fact, they are cut off from the root domain pyhsicall
See comments inline below
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ayers, Diane
> Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 9:50 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD Migrat
cess during the
transition.
Diane
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 4:46 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD Migration paths (divesting forests)
We have traditionally done a single, full migration -
- Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
> -Original Message-
> From: Ayers, Diane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 10:40 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [ActiveDir] AD Migration paths (divesting forests)
>
>
> Our company
P [Windows NT/2000 Server]
"Any sufficiently advanced technology
is indistinguishable from magic."
--- Arthur C. Clarke
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 9:40 PM
>
Our company is divesting part of the organization into a separate company.
That means we need to split our AD forest into two separate forest. We
have an sense of how we are going to do it but one question I have is the
sequence.
We are going to build the new forest (both forests are empty ro
41 matches
Mail list logo
