nt: Friday, December 02, 2005 9:23 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Scripting/WMI/MONAD - was FSMO role transfer
I was about to mention that we missed that - I think we were looking at
the roll-ups and chocolate fountains and I had no clue what it was :)
So since I
ell of red herrings in the morning" - anonymous
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 8:01 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Scripting/WMI/MONAD - was FSMO role transfer
I missed
riginal Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 9:01 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Scripting/WMI/MONAD - was FSMO role transfer
I missed the whole MONAD (WHOA for short) presentation this year. I
repeating!)
Mike Thommes
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Michael B. Smith
Sent: Thu 12/1/2005 7:36 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Scripting/WMI/MONAD - was FSMO role transfer
I gotta tell ya -- I just started vbscript
s going to make Exch
Dev listen.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael B. Smith
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 8:36 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Scripting/WMI/MONAD - was FSMO role transfer
I gotta te
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darren Mar-Elia
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 8:24 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Scripting/WMI/MONAD - was FSMO role transfer
I concur. "Whoa" is a good description. If you are a programmer or mondo
scri
of a "scripting for dummies.." :-)
Diane
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Bradley,
CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 5:14 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Scripting/WMI/
--
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Bradley,
CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 5:14 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Scripting/WMI/MONAD - was FSMO role transfer
... so in the demo I saw the guy was calculatin
-
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Bernard, Aric
*Sent:* Thursday, December 01, 2005 1:08 PM
*To:* ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
*Subject:* RE: [ActiveDir] Scripting/WMI/MONAD - was FSMO role transfer
Speaking from my own personal discoveries
In a nutshel
rk* and look at its offerings. I never digged enough to
realize this was one of them, so thanks for that!
-DaveC
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 9:15 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [Acti
rg
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Scripting/WMI/MONAD - was FSMO role transfer
You know that the scriptomatic 2 HTA will create Perl script that does WMI
right
I am not a huge fan of WMI but there are times in the scripting world if you
want to stick to pure script it is in the only way to do what yo
You know that the scriptomatic 2 HTA will create Perl script that does WMI
right
I am not a huge fan of WMI but there are times in the scripting world if you
want to stick to pure script it is in the only way to do what you want and I
will use it if I don't have time (or ability as in the case
e here
End Sub
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
c -
312.731.3132
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Kern
Sent: Friday, November 11, 2005
5:23 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] scripting
file move is
sday, November 09, 2005 1:00 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject:
Re: [ActiveDir] scripting file move issue(OT)
thanks
i think i might need a little more assistance here.
i'm a little out of my depth
On 11/9/05, Rich Milburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
Tom,
Suggest
that will show you how to list all files in a folder (and thus
get a count), as well as how to move or copy files.
Hunter
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom
KernSent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 1:00 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re: [ActiveDir]
rnSent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 12:58 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re: [ActiveDir] scripting file move issue(OT)
the source dirs take awhile to refill as they are being filled by xcopy. it copies about 4gig a batch.
The destination dir empties in about 10-15secs.
also the d
not do, in order that I may learn how to do it." - Pablo
Picasso
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Kern
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005
12:58 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] scripting
file move issue(OT)
the s
the source dirs take awhile to refill as they are being filled by xcopy. it copies about 4gig a batch.
The destination dir empties in about 10-15secs.
also the destinantion dir can only handle 1000 files at a time before being emptied.
thanks
On 11/9/05, Coleman, Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
Yes, this is scriptable. Perl vs VBS? Either will work, so
I'd go with whatever you are most comfortable with.
How quickly are your source directories going to refill,
and how quickly are is your destination directory going to get cleaned up by the
different process?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTE
ay, May 21, 2005 2:41 AMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Scripting
Delegation Question
Deleting an ACE is obviously supported.
Supporting removal of ACE is a granular way requires an
extensive regression testing, which way more complex than removing all ACE using
the sa
Hi Dan,
You don't have to remove any ACEs to achieve what you want.
Full Control corresponds to 13 bits with a value of 1 in AccessMask. You need to
use an AccessMask that excludes Delete and Delete Subtree (you didn't mention
Delete All Child Objects, but I would exclude that too).
So yo
Thanks! I’ll definitely look at your tools &
book, Alain!
Dan
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Alain Lissoir
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 11:41
PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Scripting
Delegation Ques
he case sensitivity for more examples
there.
joe
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alain
LissoirSent: Friday, May 20, 2005 7:10 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Scripting
Delegation Question
Check out the script at http://users.skynet.
joe
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alain
LissoirSent: Friday, May 20, 2005 7:10 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Scripting
Delegation Question
Check out the script at http://users.skynet.be/alain.lissoir/conferences/WMIManageSD.z
Check out the script at http://users.skynet.be/alain.lissoir/conferences/WMIManageSD.zip I
wrote for my books.
This script is fully documented in my WMI books at http://www.lissware.net (Vol
2).
It supports the management of security descriptors for files, folders,
file shares, registry, WMI
PROTECTED]>Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] scripting saclsDate: Thu, 5 May 2005 15:24:31 -0700Reply-To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgThis is a multi-part message in MIME format.--=_NextPart_000_011A_01C55186.892AACB0Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bitPaul,
May 05, 2005 12:47 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] scripting
sacls
Do you currently have permissions to view the SACL through
LDAP?
Try this
adfind -b object_DN ntSecurityDescriptor
-sddc
If you see a DN but no SDDL representation of the ACL then
you may not have
Do you currently have permissions to view the SACL through
LDAP?
Try this
adfind -b object_DN ntSecurityDescriptor
-sddc
If you see a DN but no SDDL representation of the ACL then
you may not have permissions.
Also I believe I caught the case if one of the components
of the ACL doe
wanted to keep.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brett Shirley
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2005 3:40 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Scripting DC cleanup?
Thoughts on metadata cleanup, from many points on
--Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brett Shirley
> Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2005 4:40 PM
> To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Scripting DC cleanup?
>
>
>
> from Dean Wells:
>
> > ...
4:40 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Scripting DC cleanup?
from Dean Wells:
> ... and yet no new (even very small) features will be added within a
> Service Pack :)
Please stop talking.
(see MG again, it's when they goto Regina's house)
Cheers,
Br
Please stop talking.
> (see MG again, it's when they goto Regina's house)
>
>
>
> Cheers,
> BrettSh [msft]
>
> Posting "as is", confers no rights.
>
>
> On Sat, 30 Apr 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Hmm... 2003 dsa seems to remove the metadata when you delete the
>
D] wrote:
> Hmm... 2003 dsa seems to remove the metadata when you delete the
> domain controller reference from the domain controller container.
> Anyone else notice this?
>
>
>
>
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
, 2005
5:01 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Scripting DC
cleanup?
yeah right ;-) however, I'm
quite happy about the additions in SP1 - even though this should have been
called R2 and the planned R2 would then be R3... ;-)
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [m
Send - AD
mailing listSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Scripting DC
cleanup?
...
and yet no new (even very small) features will be added within a Service Pack
:)
--Dean WellsMSEtechnology* Email: dwells@msetechnology.comhttp://msetechnology.com
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
ldn't the setting of "windows" simply be an alias
for "mac"?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken
CornetetSent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 12:57 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Scripting DC
cleanup?
Have
you
ed.
if
ADMIN_BACKGROUND is set to "mainframe" all windows switch to green-on-black
text.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of joeSent: Monday, March 21, 2005 8:44
PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE:
[ActiveDi
mailing list
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Scripting DC cleanup?
2003 RTM
-
ntdsutil: me cl
metadata cleanup: ?
?
- Show this help information
Connections
- Connect to a specific domain controller
Help
- Show
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Siddharth
SawkarSent: Monday, March 21, 2005 9:01 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org; Send - AD mailing listSubject: RE:
[ActiveDir] Scripting DC cleanup?
Does anyone have a test
W2K3 machine they can test this on- if I remember
list
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Scripting DC cleanup?
... and yet no new (even very small)
features will be added within a Service Pack :)
--
Dean Wells
MSEtechnology
* Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://msetechnology.com
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
21, 2005 7:46 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Scripting DC
cleanup?
If you're taling about W2K3 then
after installing SP1 you don't need to select the site, domain, etc. Just select
the server and kill it!
QUOTE
The Ntdsutil.exe command-line
tool for ma
PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Scripting DC
cleanup?
If you're taling about W2K3 then
after installing SP1 you don't need to select the site, domain, etc. Just select
the server and kill it!
QUOTE
The Ntdsutil.exe command-line
tool for managing the A
On Behalf Of
joeSent: Friday, March 18, 2005 18:00To:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Scripting DC
cleanup?
I would recommend watching your AD to see exactly what
NTDSUTIL is doing, you can actually just get away from using it and deleting the
appropriate objects directly
pecifically and very purposely avoids DCs.
joe
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken
CornetetSent: Friday, March 18, 2005 10:32 AMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Scripting DC
cleanup?
I
guess I should have elaborated. NTDSUtil ref
ay, March 18, 2005 9:40
AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE:
[ActiveDir] Scripting DC cleanup?
You can make
ntdsutil work in a script. Just make a batch file. The syntax is to put a
sapce between each command and put them in quotes:
ntdsutil
"connect to dom
You can make ntdsutil work in a script. Just make a batch file. The syntax is
to put a sapce between each command and put them in quotes:
ntdsutil "connect to domain 1" "do something cool" "build an arc"
ntdsutil "connect to domain 2" "do something cool" "build an arc"
etc etc
--Brian Desmon
Can't imagine why that wouldn't be possible. NTDSUTIL is similar to NETSH
in that you can run the commands from a single call.
i.e. ntdsutil command command command command. Etc
http://www.jsifaq.com/SUBJ/tip4600/rh4675.htm
And
http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/WindowsServ/2003/s
ay, November 03, 2004 1:22 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Scripting question - Net Send command
>
> Create a virtual directory for the web page, and configure it
> to run as the local or domain user of your choice.
>
> -Original Message-
>
list
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 9:46
AM
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Scripting
help
No,
had I read your question more thoroughly I'd have known that was useful to you
;) It currently differentiates the group types by
querying on the bit used by AD to maintain the
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charlie Kaiser
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 2:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Scripting question - Net Send command
That was my thought; I'd prefer not to have IUSR running that type of
executable. An
Those popups are simply mailslot messages. You might be able to find a bit
of perl or (doubtfully) vbscript to do that directly.
The one thing I really wanted to say is that those messages aren't
guaranteed, you might push in that direction to your management. If it is
important for the people to
004 12:25 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Scripting question - Net Send command
>
> It's an ugly hole. My option would be to have the tool run in
> the context of
> another account (like a service account).
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Dèjì Akóm
NA
Systems Engineer
Essex Credit / Brickwalk
510 595 5083
**
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 12:25 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE:
s the Tomorrow you were worried about
Yesterday? -anon
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Charlie Kaiser
Sent: Wed 11/3/2004 11:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Scripting question - Net Send command
Yeah; that's kinda what I ran into.
> From: Dale, Rick
> Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 1:41 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Scripting question - Net Send command
>
> Try this:
>
> dim oWSH, msg
> Set oWSH = CreateObject("WScript.Shell")
>
Return Receipt
Your RE: [ActiveDir] Scripting question - Net Send command
document
lk
510 595 5083
**
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet
> Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 11:12 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Scripting question - Net Send command
>
Try this:
dim oWSH, msg
Set oWSH = CreateObject("WScript.Shell")
msg = "%comspec% /c net send " & sendto & " " " & description
oWSH.Run msg
Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charlie Kaiser
Sent:
As a security feature on w2k3, the IUSR_ user id has no permissions to
any files (including net.exe).
Either give the IUSR_ account permissions to net.exe, or configure the
web site to run under a user id that has permission.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
Thanks Al.
I'm learning one hell of lot but the learning curve is almost an
overhang :) :)
Regards
Peter
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mulnick, Al
Sent: 03 November 2004 16:52
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Scri
:47
To: Send - AD mailing list
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Scripting
help
No, had I read your question more
thoroughly I'd have known that was useful to you ;) It currently
differentiates the group types by querying on the bit used by AD to maintain
the difference. Proxy address doesn&#
ohnson
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 9:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Scripting help
Thanks Dean. Would that return the Security groups that are also being used
as DL by virtue of having the proxy address field set?
Sorry if it's
, November 03, 2004 9:13 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Scripting
help
Thanks Dean. Would that
return the Security groups that are also being used as DL by virtue of having
the proxy address field set?
Sorry if it’s an
obvious question but I new to this side of AD
: 03 November 2004 16:11
To: Send - AD mailing list
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Scripting
help
Here's but two possible ways that sprung
to mind.
Returns security groups
only -
dsquery * domainroot -filter "(&(objectcategory=group)(!sAMAccountType:1.2.840.113
Here's
but two possible ways that sprung to mind.
Returns security groups only
-
dsquery * domainroot -filter
"(&(objectcategory=group)(!sAMAccountType:1.2.840.113556.1.4.803:=1))"
Return DLs only -
dsquery * domainroot -filter
"(&(objectcategory=group)(sAMAccountType:1.2.840.113556.
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Darren Mar-Elia
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 1:31
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Scripting
GP woes
Kevin-
The issue is that the GPMC scripting
interface doesn't support Deny ACEs. It only provides a set of pre-determined
Allow permi
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin
SullivanSent: Friday, August 27, 2004 10:16 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Scripting GP
woes
I am sure I will
butcher this explanation but I’ll give it a shot. For a reference, Bill Boswell
wrote Chapter 7 (Scri
absence of the Allow ACE on Read would be
sufficient, but Paul said that he needed to set an explicit
Deny.
From: Kevin Sullivan
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 11:16
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir]
Scripting GP woes
I am sure I will
butcher this exp
…
Kevin
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Coleman, Hunter
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004
10:06 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Scripting
GP woes
Paul-
I think that you're going to have to get
the GUID of the GPO, and
Paul-
I think that you're going to have to get the GUID of the
GPO, and then set a Deny Read ACE on the NTFS permissions under
Winnt\SYSVOL\sysvol\domain\policies\{GUID}. You could use a script or command
line utility like Xcacls to do that.
Hunter
From: PAUL MAYES
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
vid A
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 10:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Scripting new ACE into DACL fails with Account
Op erators
I'm running this directly on a lab DC, so that particular guess
shouldn't apply...I'm not about to start mucking around in c++ for this
(
gle
posting...
Anyhow, thanks for (once again) putting me on the right track.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 7:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Scripting new ACE into DACL fails
om: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fugleberg, David A
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 5:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Scripting new ACE into DACL fails with Account Op
erators
I suspect that being a Built-in group has something to do with it...I'm just
lo
ther folks do when they remove
someone from one of the 'protected' groups to return them to a 'normal'
user status ?
Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mulnick, Al
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 4:13 PM
To: '[EMAIL
Not completely sure how to work around it, but they are different group
types. Account Operators are built-in domain local accounts whereas your
test group is not.
Curious why you want to apply this to each account vs. each OU if
inheritably permissions is in effect?
There may be something help
Excellent, let me know if you want me to review it. :o)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robbie Allen
(rallen)
Sent: Saturday, April 17, 2004 12:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] scripting admin
But of course
But of course :-)
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
> Sent: Friday, April 16, 2004 4:44 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] scripting admin
>
> And you are writi
, 2004 8:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] scripting admin
On a related note, I'm working on a VBScript to Perl code converter.
Input some VBScript code and output the (roughly) equivalent Perl code.
I just started a couple of weeks ago, but should have something in a month
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 2:38 PM> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] scripting admin> > I'll second this. I've only run into one thing where I > couldn't get Perl to work (deep, dark, ugly MAPI stuff...)> > Other than that, it's almo
Way Cool!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robbie Allen
(rallen)
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 7:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] scripting admin
On a related note, I'm working on a VBScript to Perl code conv
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 11:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] scripting admin
I say Perl...
The activestate dist is great. I am not aware of anything off
the top of
my head you can do in vbscript that you can't do in perl. You m
e.com/
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet
> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 2:38 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] scripting admin
>
> I'll second this. I've only run into one thi
n Behalf Of joe
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 11:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] scripting admin
I say Perl...
The activestate dist is great. I am not aware of anything off the top of
my head you can do in vbscript that you can't do in perl. You may want
to learn e
I say Perl...
The activestate dist is great. I am not aware of anything off the top of my
head you can do in vbscript that you can't do in perl. You may want to learn
enough vbscript to convert vbscripts others have written to perl.
Overall for really simple things vbscript may be easier at fir
EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Scripting
terminology question
The i, j business in Fortran is because those variables
default to being integers (as, I think, do k,l,m,n) - loops need integer
variables so you always used the first available integer variables for your loop
counters.
Steve
February 2004 15:54To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Scripting
terminology question
i is used for a variety of reasons that go back even before
hungarian. It can stand for index for instance which is one of the reasons you
see it as common useage in loops. FORTRAN made big use of i/j
you shouldn't use it
because MS is destroying the world and Bill is the antichrist.
joe
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rich
MilburnSent: Monday, February 09, 2004 9:07 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Scripting
terminology questio
: joe
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2004
12:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Scripting
terminology question
I shouldn't even guess - it has come
out of the land that produced Squeaky Lobster
However here would be my swing at it... It
: Saturday, February 07, 2004 10:27 PMTo:
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Scripting
terminology question
And I'm sure there's some obscure but important reason that they use
uppercase for "IAD" and lowercase for 's"...
:-)
***
e been using it since it came out of Redmond.
Sincerely,Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE MCSA MCP+Iwww.akomolafe.comwww.iyaburo.comDo you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about Yesterday? -anon
From: joeSent: Sat 2/7/2004 6:35 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Scripti
*
-Original Message-From: joe
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004
6:35 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] Scripting terminology question
Meaning: 42
Origin: A moon around Saturn that blew apart and is now a
ring.
IADs: Interface
at I am aware of but helps them
stick out.
joe
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of deji
AgbaSent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 10:28 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Scripting
terminology question
H...I think this
belogs in the class of
H...I think this belogs in the class of the "what is the meaning/origin of life?" questions :). I never bothered to ask.
Sincerely,Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE MCSA MCP+Iwww.akomolafe.comwww.iyaburo.comDo you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about Yesterday? -anon
Title: RE: [ActiveDir] Scripting terminology question
Here is a wonderful place to start:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url="">
It should give you a good foundation to use brilliant tools like Robbie's book.
Which by the way I have posted
At a guess I would say it stands for:
Interface to Active Directory services.
Tony
-- Original Message --
From: Charlie Kaiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 19:05:24 -0800
OK, scripting gurus. I'm trying to wrap m
]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Scripting Help
David, try recipe 6.2 from Robbie Allen's AD Cookbook. If you don't have the book, I
highly recommend
it, but you can also find what you need at www.rallenhome.com
There are also some create user scripts at Clarence Washington'
David, try recipe 6.2 from Robbie Allen's AD Cookbook. If you don't have the book, I
highly recommend
it, but you can also find what you need at www.rallenhome.com
There are also some create user scripts at Clarence Washington's site at
http://cwashington.netreach.net
-Original Message
Title: Message
Would also be interested in seeing a
sample script…
Thanks
Matty
From:
Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 02 December 2003 20:02
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Scripting
a DNS Host Record Update
More or less
: Tuesday, December 02, 2003
12:28 PMTo: AD mailing list (Send)Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] Scripting a DNS Host Record Update
If,
by references, you mean formal documentation, no, I'm afraid not. This
is a technique I theorized some time ago, I developed a couple of adhoc
scripts back
y.com http://msetechnology.com
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Roger
SeielstadSent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 12:14 PMTo:
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Scripting a
DNS Host Record Update
Do
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
