Re: [AFMUG] -48 PDU

2:34:35 PM >>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] -48 PDU >>>> >>>> >>>> The pdu design will be ground specific. The solid state relay design >>>> will be isolated so it doesn't matter. >>>> On Jul 15, 2016 7:47 AM, "Adam Moffett

Re: [AFMUG] -48 PDU

...@packetflux.com <mailto:li...@packetflux.com>> To: "af" <af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>> Sent: 7/15/2016 2:34:35 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] -48 PDU The pdu design will be ground specific. The solid s

Re: [AFMUG] -48 PDU

k awesome! >>> >>> So the old 10/100 SyncInjector is gone? Damn. Oh well, guess we need to >>> start using the new stuff anyway. >>> >>> >>> On 7/15/2016 1:57 PM, Adam Moffett wrote: >>> >>> I like the compactness of the PDU, so I can

Re: [AFMUG] -48 PDU

sage -- From: "Forrest Christian (List Account)" <li...@packetflux.com <mailto:li...@packetflux.com>> To: "af" <af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>> Sent: 7/15/2016 2:34:35 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] -48 PDU

Re: [AFMUG] -48 PDU

am Moffett wrote: >> >> I like the compactness of the PDU, so I can live with that limitation. >> >> >> -- Original Message ------ >> From: "Forrest Christian (List Account)" <li...@packetflux.com> >> To: "af" <af@afmug.com> >&

Re: [AFMUG] -48 PDU

inal Message -- From: "Forrest Christian (List Account)" <li...@packetflux.com <mailto:li...@packetflux.com>> To: "af" <af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>> Sent: 7/15/2016 2:34:35 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] -48 PDU The pdu design wi

Re: [AFMUG] -48 PDU

/2016 1:57 PM, Adam Moffett wrote: > > I like the compactness of the PDU, so I can live with that limitation. > > > -- Original Message -- > From: "Forrest Christian (List Account)" <li...@packetflux.com> > To: "af" <af@afmug.com>

Re: [AFMUG] -48 PDU

-- From: "Forrest Christian (List Account)" <li...@packetflux.com <mailto:li...@packetflux.com>> To: "af" <af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>> Sent: 7/15/2016 2:34:35 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] -48 PDU The pdu design will be ground specific. The solid state

Re: [AFMUG] -48 PDU

I like the compactness of the PDU, so I can live with that limitation. -- Original Message -- From: "Forrest Christian (List Account)" <li...@packetflux.com> To: "af" <af@afmug.com> Sent: 7/15/2016 2:34:35 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] -48 PDU The pd

Re: [AFMUG] -48 PDU

e one PDU for either type of loads, or would I have > to have separate +V and -V PDU's? > > > > -- Original Message -- > From: "Forrest Christian (List Account)" <li...@packetflux.com> > To: "af" <af@afmug.com> > Sent: 7/12/2016 5

Re: [AFMUG] -48 PDU

uot;af" <af@afmug.com> Sent: 7/12/2016 5:08:55 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] -48 PDU I have around 10 or so new/revised products which will be shipping over the next few months. (4 of the ones in our backlog have just started shipping the last couple of weeks, and others are coming off th

Re: [AFMUG] -48 PDU

That's cool! I can wait for the new stuff. And I'll mention that I'm much more interested in the devices with electronic over-current protection to eliminate fuses. On 7/12/2016 4:08 AM, Forrest Christian (List Account) wrote: I have around 10 or so new/revised products which will be shipping

Re: [AFMUG] -48 PDU

I have around 10 or so new/revised products which will be shipping over the next few months. (4 of the ones in our backlog have just started shipping the last couple of weeks, and others are coming off the pipeline shortly). At least two of the coming products are intended to fix the lack of

Re: [AFMUG] -48 PDU

Just one gotcha: they use a T90 relay in these, and I've never seen a T90 relay rated over 28VDC (They switch high voltage AC just fine, but not DC). Plus most T90 relays have a high minimum load (0;5A or 1A), which may not be a problem. On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 12:44 AM, Josh Reynolds

Re: [AFMUG] -48 PDU

Digital loggers din relay III? Web controlled, scriptable. On Jul 11, 2016 9:11 PM, "George Skorup" wrote: > I asked Forrest about doing a -48 version of the 5ch PDU. He said it would > need some tweaking since the PDU itself is powered by the main input, kinda > like a

Re: [AFMUG] -48 PDU

I asked Forrest about doing a -48 version of the 5ch PDU. He said it would need some tweaking since the PDU itself is powered by the main input, kinda like a SyncInjector. Depending on your current, you could use a regular 4-relay exp. module to switch the hot wire for each device. Should be

Re: [AFMUG] -48 PDU

DIN Relay 3? Depends on your amperage? http://www.digital-loggers.com/din.html beware, stupid autoplaying video. On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 5:30 PM, Adam Moffett wrote: > Is there a relatively cheap device that can take 48v in and switch a > handful of -48vdc loads on and

[AFMUG] -48 PDU

Is there a relatively cheap device that can take 48v in and switch a handful of -48vdc loads on and off? I'm thinking like $100-200 kind of cheap. Small and DIN mount would be best. The packetflux PDU has a negative ground, so that's already out.

Re: [AFMUG] -48 PDU suggestions

Yes, for everyone who has this issue, could you send an email into cust...@packetflux.com. Debbie will be handling these RMA's - she's in the process of finding the affected orders and notifying everyone. Sending a ticket in with which of the following you want us to do, with appropriate

Re: [AFMUG] -48 PDU suggestions

and smaller components will cling to the soldering iron. From: Forrest Christian (List Account) Sent: Monday, August 24, 2015 1:47 AM To: af Subject: Re: [AFMUG] -48 PDU suggestions To anyone seeing the mis-reading voltage issue: Can you let me know the serial numbers of the units seeing

Re: [AFMUG] -48 PDU suggestions

To anyone seeing the mis-reading voltage issue: Can you let me know the serial numbers of the units seeing this issue? I'm hopeful that they are in the range of 98328 through 98357. It looks like those we built since the last board revision may have an assembly error which is causing this -

Re: [AFMUG] -48 PDU suggestions

The two new ones I have are 98352 and 98356. If you could turn them around pretty fast (say a week), then I wouldn't have a problem sending them in to have the component removed and then returned to me so you don't have to build new ones. Whatever you want to do. Do you want me to open a

Re: [AFMUG] -48 PDU suggestions

On 8/18/2015 1:51 PM, Adam Moffett wrote: I like the packetflux PDU, but I need to switch -48 loads. Does anybody have any suggestions? Forrest.if you make it I will buy it. Try ICT if you want remote meter and switching capabilities. These are the ones I have been using.

Re: [AFMUG] -48 PDU suggestions

How's that working out for you? bp part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com On 8/18/2015 11:53 AM, Chuck McCown wrote: (I quit and am trying to remain sober)

Re: [AFMUG] -48 PDU suggestions

A pox on all products containing software... (I quit and am trying to remain sober). -Original Message- From: Adam Moffett Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 12:51 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] -48 PDU suggestions I like the packetflux PDU, but I need to switch -48 loads. Does

Re: [AFMUG] -48 PDU suggestions

@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] -48 PDU suggestions I like the packetflux PDU, but I need to switch -48 loads. Does anybody have any suggestions? Forrest.if you make it I will buy it.

Re: [AFMUG] -48 PDU suggestions

The pdu was designed to be able to be built for neg48 as well, but relies on expansion bus power to power it. This means that if you reboot the base unit, the pdu and the devices attached to it will also reboot. There are some messy ways we can bring this power in to avoid this. Because of

Re: [AFMUG] -48 PDU suggestions

SoI've bought half the units sold? You should look for my email to custsvc from yesterday. I would be looking for 60 units at neg48. On 8/18/2015 5:11 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) wrote: The pdu was designed to be able to be built for neg48 as well, but relies on expansion

Re: [AFMUG] -48 PDU suggestions

I've heard twice now weirdness with that voltage reading.Both in the last week. I haven't had a chance to get it on the bench to test. I'm guessing that I'm reading the wrong adc input somehow. On Aug 18, 2015 4:00 PM, George Skorup geo...@cbcast.com wrote: Not to get off topic here, but

Re: [AFMUG] -48 PDU suggestions

Not to get off topic here, but the two 5ch PDUs I just got show 35.5-ish volts on the master input... with no supply connected. And the status LED doesn't flash like it normally would if it sees no/low voltage on the master. Seems strange. Are these bad or should I just not worry about it?

Re: [AFMUG] -48 PDU suggestions

I'm pretty sure mine were reading the correct voltages until after the software update. Now the 24v input reads 46, and the 48v input reads 61. Hardware or software? Hopefully these can be fixed in software because I need to get them deployed. Does this mean the overcurrent protection won't

Re: [AFMUG] -48 PDU suggestions

I'm 99% sure that this reading was working before as well, or at least at some point. I am very particular about checking the overcurrent protection on these so I can pretty much guarantee that is fine. The voltage is sort of a 'bonus feature' so I'm a bit less particular about it - but I know

Re: [AFMUG] -48 PDU suggestions

If you've bought at least 25, yes. I'm in classes all this week, and wasn't feeling well last night so I shirked my ticket duties last night. I'll try to get back to you tonight after classes. On Aug 18, 2015 2:25 PM, Adam Moffett dmmoff...@gmail.com wrote: SoI've bought half the units