**Unfortunately
Craig
- Original Message -
From: "CBB - Jay Fuller via Af"
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2014 7:10:45 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 pmp450 results - was Dear Cambium
Well, here, it's either that, or possibly
0 results - was Dear Cambium
Did you have 900 mhz there before? If so, what was the signal?
If NOT, what did you have there before?
- Original Message -
From: Craig House via Af
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2014 12:39 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 pmp450 results - w
Well, here, it's either that, or possibly the runcomm TVWSmaybe both?>
- Original Message -
From: Ken Hohhof via Af
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2014 2:10 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 pmp450 results - was Dear Cambium
Why do you say that?
Did you have 900 mhz there before? If so, what was the signal?
If NOT, what did you have there before?
- Original Message -
From: Craig House via Af
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2014 12:39 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 pmp450 results - was Dear Cambium
ing off an omni. I should point that out. Sector trials up next.
- Original Message -
From: Ken Hohhof via Af
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2014 12:14 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 pmp450 results - was Dear Cambium
We did a bare SM the other day 0.6 miles –58
in 3.65 would be
there is no PTP rule, so 2.4 might have a slight advantage in the upstream
direction if you use a dish.
From: Craig House via Af
Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2014 3:22 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 pmp450 results - was Dear Cambium
This is currently on a 3.65
on, simply because of the resulting
effect on SNR.
bp
On 9/21/2014 11:21 AM, CBB - Jay Fuller via Af wrote:
Surely ppl using 3.65 are going through trees ?
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone
- Reply message -
From: "Ken Hohhof via Af"
To:
Subject: [AFMUG] 3.65 pmp
;Ken Hohhof via Af"
To:
Subject: [AFMUG] 3.65 pmp450 results - was Dear Cambium
Date: Sun, Sep 21, 2014 12:14 PM
We did a bare SM the other day 0.6 miles –58 and 8X in a 10 MHz
channel, that tells me we can go a lot farther without a dish,
probably 1.5 miles or more. Or are you talking
M
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 pmp450 results - was Dear Cambium
That does not seem right. What does LinkPlanner say you should get?
Are you getting –73 at both the AP and the SM?
Is this with a Cambium 90 degree sector at the AP end?
Any downtilt, and if so, how much?
Are you near the edge of
der no WIMAX/LTE super sauce.
>>
>> I really wish people would loosen their grip on the concept that the main
>> reason to consider PMP450 in 3.65 GHz is for NLOS. Even if that works for
>> you, it’s way too narrow a view of the product.
>>
>>
>> Fro
House via Af
Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2014 2:35 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 pmp450 results - was Dear Cambium
My 4.7 mile link at - 73 with the dish is not going through any trees it's
actually tower to tower
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 21, 2014, at 14:10, Ken Hohhof v
unday, September 21, 2014 at 3:35 PM
To: "af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>" mailto:af@afmug.com>>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 pmp450 results - was Dear Cambium
My 4.7 mile link at - 73 with the dish is not going through any trees it's
actually tower to tower
Sent
t that the main
> reason to consider PMP450 in 3.65 GHz is for NLOS. Even if that works for
> you, it’s way too narrow a view of the product.
>
>
> From: CBB - Jay Fullervia Af
> Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2014 1:21 PM
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 p
reason to consider PMP450 in 3.65 GHz is for NLOS. Even if that works for you,
it’s way too narrow a view of the product.
From: CBB - Jay Fullervia Af
Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2014 1:21 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 pmp450 results - was Dear Cambium
Surely ppl using 3.65
Surely ppl using 3.65 are going through trees ?
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone
- Reply message -
From: "Ken Hohhof via Af"
To:
Subject: [AFMUG] 3.65 pmp450 results - was Dear Cambium
Date: Sun, Sep 21, 2014 12:14 PM
We did a bare SM the other day 0.6 miles
t a
>> Stinger/CLIP type of product, I was told the size at 2.4 or 3.65 GHz get too
>> big or else the gain isn’t worth it.
>>
>> From: CBB - Jay Fuller via Af
>> Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2014 11:58 AM
>> To: af@afmug.com
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 pm
;
> From: CBB - Jay Fuller via Af
> Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2014 11:58 AM
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 pmp450 results - was Dear Cambium
>
>
> We didn't get very far without a dish ; what are you seeing in terms of how
> far you can get before you ha
connectorized SM with a panel. When I asked about a
Stinger/CLIP type of product, I was told the size at 2.4 or 3.65 GHz get too
big or else the gain isn’t worth it.
From: CBB - Jay Fuller via Af
Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2014 11:58 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 pmp450 results
Couldn’t get much gain out of a stinger design due to the polarization issues.
So we did a radio holder for our SL dishes.
From: CBB - Jay Fuller via Af
Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2014 10:58 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 pmp450 results - was Dear Cambium
We didn't get
We didn't get very far without a dish ; what are you seeing in terms of how far
you can get before you have a dish?
Are you using a dish with most, or is there a stinger available or something
"mid-term" ?
Must be honest, we haven't tried the dish yet. Need to very soon as fall is
basically
20 matches
Mail list logo
