We've got a bunch of these GSI watchdogs around. I stick a mikrotik hAP lite in
and forward ports through it. Port 80 is all I allow and they never have any
problems getting in. I setup a dns entry like lname.airlink123.com and the
farmers get along just fine with it. Never any issues with
Lol... yeah that happens sometimes too but we are very persistent on that kind
of stuff ;)
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 6, 2016, at 9:52 PM, George Skorup wrote:
>
> "Sorry, LEC says no ports available."
>
>> On 10/6/2016 8:22 PM, Paul Stewart wrote:
>> Big decision for us
"Sorry, LEC says no ports available."
On 10/6/2016 8:22 PM, Paul Stewart wrote:
Big decision for us Canadians today who utilize wholesale access
networks a lot … (besides our own infrastructure)
Big decision for us Canadians today who utilize wholesale access networks a lot
… (besides our own infrastructure)
> http://www.bnn.ca/crtc-slashes-wholesale-fees-charged-by-incumbent-isps-in-bid-to-stay-competitive-1.580977
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Mike Hammett" <af...@ics-il.net>
> To: "af" <af@afmug.com>
> Sent: Thursday, October 6, 2016 11:10:13 AM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Bell Canada deregulating in areas
>
> Entirely
" <li...@wavedirect.org>
To: "af" <af@afmug.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 6, 2016 10:14:35 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Bell Canada deregulating in areas
I know you can use tunnels and vlps. I've done it before with a TLS 400km's
away to another provider. But it defeats the purpose of
om>
Sent: Thursday, October 6, 2016 11:10:13 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Bell Canada deregulating in areas
Entirely possible, but usually people aren't aware of the options available to
them.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers
quot; <af@afmug.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 6, 2016 10:02:28 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Bell Canada deregulating in areas
Our area is very limited to choices. That is the only reason why I even
considered calling Bell!
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Stewart" <p...@pa
Our area is very limited to choices. That is the only reason why I even
considered calling Bell!
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Stewart" <p...@paulstewart.org>
To: "af" <af@afmug.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 6, 2016 10:58:03 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] B
.org>
> To: "af" <af@afmug.com>
> Sent: Thursday, October 6, 2016 9:51:05 AM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Bell Canada deregulating in areas
>
> This is definately having impact on third party providers (TPIA as
> referenced)..
>
> Bell has been told that they
to competitors even at the wholesale level to anyone in the area. They
want to do their own thing.
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Stewart" <p...@paulstewart.org>
To: "af" <af@afmug.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 6, 2016 9:51:05 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] B
enemy
the cable companies, or maybe just wanting to be a 100% wireless company.
-Original Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Steve
Sent: Thursday, October 6, 2016 8:18 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] Bell Canada deregulating in areas
Locally see
This is definately having impact on third party providers (TPIA as
referenced)..
Bell has been told that they must provide mandated access to these fiber
networks as part of a ruling fairly recently … along with the access being
opened up, there are separate hearings on disaggregation of
st wanting to be a 100% wireless company.
-Original Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Steve
Sent: Thursday, October 6, 2016 8:18 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] Bell Canada deregulating in areas
Locally seeing these notices popping up from Bell. So they are
Locally seeing these notices popping up from Bell. So they are requesting to be
exempt from the rules the CRTC has set forth. This would be equivalent to you
going to the FCC and saying "your rules don't apply to us and I want you to
recognize that in these particular areas". Is my
15 matches
Mail list logo