Assess this, declare that, dude can't take a weekend anymore
Seriously though, maybe I should judge those CFJs on whether
the tournament even exists first? Sorry about not getting to those,
maybe tonight ( -7:00 time), definitely by tomorrow.
On Sun, 15 Jul 2018, Publius Scribonius Schola
G., could you declare the winners, so that I may award the appropriate
patent titles?
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 3:19 PM Aris Merchant
wrote:
>
> It probably shouldn't have been. My thinking was that tournament is only
> really supposed to last a few weeks (there's a SHOULD to that effect). If
> it g
I have some ideas that are almost ready to be released to do with the
library and archive. I should be sending those out by next Friday.
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 5:40 PM Edward Murphy wrote:
>
> I resolve the Herald election as follows:
>
> * PSS, Kenyon, Aris, Corona, 天火狐, twg, G., telnaior vote f
-- Forwarded message -
From: Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
Date: Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 6:37 PM
Subject: BUS: Test, not a ruleset
To: Agora Business
THE SHORT LOGICAL RULESET
Most Recent Ruleset Change Recorded:
Proposal 8052 (Let's not make game assets...) took effect 15 Jun
-- Forwarded message -
From: Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
Date: Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 6:37 PM
Subject: BUS: Test, not a ruleset
To: Agora Business
THE FULL LOGICAL RULESET
Most Recent Ruleset Change Recorded:
Proposal 8052 (Let's not make game assets...) took effect 15 June
It probably shouldn't have been. My thinking was that tournament is only
really supposed to last a few weeks (there's a SHOULD to that effect). If
it goes for three months, it's way overtime, perhaps because it's broken or
no one is interested enough to complete the goal condition. Under those
circ
Oh, I missed that rule. One question: Why was the 3-month time limit included?
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 3:00 PM Aris Merchant
wrote:
>
> R2464, "Tournaments": "If a winner of a tournament is determined within
> within 3 months of its initiation, that person or persons win the game,
> otherwise the
R2464, "Tournaments": "If a winner of a tournament is determined within
within 3 months of its initiation, that person or persons win the game,
otherwise the tournament concludes with no winner."
Who do you think wrote the latest version of the tournament rules. :)
-Aris
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at
I don't think that you get a win from the Birthday Tournament under
the current rules.
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 2:52 PM Aris Merchant
wrote:
>
> I agree about the short times as well. Sorry everyone. Now we just have to
> see who wins on points...
>
> If I would be appointed Speaker, I request that
I agree about the short times as well. Sorry everyone. Now we just have to
see who wins on points...
If I would be appointed Speaker, I request that the appointment be deferred
until after the PM election.
-Aris
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 9:42 AM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> Yah sorry about that, the
Thank you. That resolves the immediate problem quite nicely.
-Aris
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 8:56 AM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> For good measure I transfer 10 more paper to Aris.
>
> On Sun, 15 Jul 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > I transfer 10 paper to Aris now can you stop going on about that
> >
> >
I vote [Aris, Corona] in the ongoing Prime Minister election.
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On July 15, 2018 5:50 PM, Edward Murphy wrote:
>
>
> I initiate an Agoran decision to select the winner of the Prime Minister
>
> election. The vote collector is the ADoP (me), the valid
Aris wrote:
Could we bring back a small judicial salary? Say 5 points for a
judgement. This could be scammed, theoretically, but it would be hard
without a R2175 judicial excess violation.
Or just limit to the salary to the first N cases per week.
Yah sorry about that, the first draft regs used original FRC timing which
seemed far too long - holiday tournaments have sometimes worked best
as blitz versions but this was too short, somewhere in the middle would
have been best.
On Sun, 15 Jul 2018, Rebecca wrote:
> damn time limits!! thi
damn time limits!! this would have been more fun with higher
participation/longer time but congrats aris.
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 11:05 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
wrote:
> Yes. That is my third strike. Now, Aris is the only remaining player,
> assuming eir argument is ruled VALID and
Yes. That is my third strike. Now, Aris is the only remaining player,
assuming eir argument is ruled VALID and e thus wins.
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 8:59 AM Corona wrote:
>
> > [...] with which Agora would establish relations.
>
> You mean G.A.N. Agora?
>
> ~Corona
>
> On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 1:52
> [...] with which Agora would establish relations.
You mean G.A.N. Agora?
~Corona
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 1:52 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I submit the below argument on the third docket:
>
> Your Honor,
>
> I agree with My Fellow Counse
I got a local NVG admin to look at this, and apparently the Agora list
server keeps getting intermittently on the spamcop.net blacklist.
(Perhaps unrelatedly, my admin also suggested it should get a reverse
DNS entry.)
Sadly the local fix he applied isn't quite working for me yet, as I'm
sti
It's fine, I just wanted to remind you of it for the future.
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 6:32 AM Rebecca wrote:
>
> Oops. That's not a mandate and there's no retracting fines, but
> acknowledged, and I apologize. I thought it was only Christmas.
>
> There is a rule that says that fines are not effecti
Oops. That's not a mandate and there's no retracting fines, but
acknowledged, and I apologize. I thought it was only Christmas.
There is a rule that says that fines are not effective if the
punishment imposed is manifestly inappropriate but that's only for the
value of the fine, so there's no chal
Yeah, the only reason I left it as vague as I did was to leave the door open
for a potential scam - which didn't work out as I planned because it relied on
a certain confluence of events that ended up not happening. (Not going to
explain it in case I get the chance to use it again in the future.
Please note Rule 1769 and the fact that it applies to all of these violations.
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 4:09 AM Rebecca wrote:
>
> There is one person recently late on reports (myself) and three people
> very late on CFJs. One of them is Gaelan, a zombie, but the other two
> are PSS and ATMunn, who
Sure, just so long as you're not planning to deputize for Promotor. :)
More seriously: it's generally considered polite to deputize for an
office that's vacant, or very extremely late. Mostly active or
semi-active players don't tend to like having their offices suddenly
taken from them, even if th
H. Assessor, would you consider assessing at least 8061? Proposal
gameplay is kind of stalled waiting for it.
-Aris
24 matches
Mail list logo
