[Vo]:ARPA workshop site now includes many papers and slides

See: https://arpa-e.energy.gov/events/low-energy-nuclear-reactions-workshop Some depressing ones: https://arpa-e.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2021LENR_workshop_Metzler.pdf http://coldfusioncommunity.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/1_JCMNS-Vol20.pdf

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.2.2 from 2.2.2rc1

che/airflow/issues/19519 > > On Tue, Nov 9, 2021, at 5:30 PM, Jed Cunningham wrote: > > Hey fellow Airflowers, > > I have cut Airflow 2.2.2rc1. This email is calling a vote on the release, > which will last for 72 hours, from Tuesday, October 9, 2021 at 22:30 UTC > until Friday,

[VOTE] Release Airflow 2.2.2 from 2.2.2rc1

eter documentation for "timetable" (#19282) - Improve Kubernetes Executor docs (#19339) - Update image tag used in docker docs Thanks, Jed

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow Helm Chart version 1.3.0 Released

helm-chart/1.3.0/changelog.html Thanks to all the contributors who made this possible. Thanks, Jed

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow Helm Chart version 1.3.0 Released

helm-chart/1.3.0/changelog.html Thanks to all the contributors who made this possible. Thanks, Jed

Re: [petsc-users] Strange behavior of TS after setting hand-coded Jacobian

Barry Smith writes: > Note that you get the same result if you think of the problem as a DAE > because the residual equation is R_{V_1} = V_1^{n+1} and the derivative of > this with respect to V_1^{n+1} is 1 (not zero). So you still end up with a > nonzero on the diagonal, not zero.

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Airflow Helm Chart 1.3.0 based on 1.3.0rc1

- Kamil Breguła "+1" Non-Binding votes: - Jed Cunningham - Daniel Standish Vote thread:https://lists.apache.org/thread/6h6g83k1rvnqphrjjoyvdbgdfhb7zls4 I'll continue with the release process and the release announcement will follow shortly. Thanks, Jed

[VOTE] Release Apache Airflow Helm Chart 1.3.0 based on 1.3.0rc1

the artifact without modifying the artifact checksums when we actually release. Thanks, Jed

Re: [petsc-users] Tutorials test case cannot run in parallel

Mark Adams writes: > Do we have a policy on this? I know some tests say they are serial. > Maybe just say that tests are only supported for the parameters in the test. If a test is serial, it should check the size of PETSC_COMM_WORLD and error if it's bigger than 1. It doesn't help to have a

[Vo]:Elsevier’s new report highlights Pathways to Net Zero

Here is the mainstream, conventional view of future energy. Nothing about cold fusion, obviously. But this has useful information. Report: How can research help the world hit net zero by 2050? Explore emerging trends and opportunities to maximize the impact of clean-energy research in "Pathways

Re: [petsc-users] How to construct DMPlex of cells with different topological dimension?

袁煕 writes: > Well! All objects in this world could definitely be modeled as 3D volumes. > But considering costs of meshing and following calculations, in most cases > it is neither practical nor necessary. And in some specific cases, e.g., to > model cell membranes, 2D membrane elements may

Re: Arrow in HPC

s important. >From way up-thread (sorry): >> >>>>> Jed - how would you see MPI and Flight interacting? As another >> >>>>> transport/alternative to UCX? I admit I'm not familiar with the HPC >> >>>>> space. MPI has collective operations

[jira] [Created] (AVRO-3244) C++ Consumers cannot deserialise new enum values as per specification

Jed Robertson created AVRO-3244: --- Summary: C++ Consumers cannot deserialise new enum values as per specification Key: AVRO-3244 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-3244 Project: Apache Avro

Airflow 2.2.1 is released

-airflow/2.2.1/ Find the CHANGELOG here for more details: https://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow/2.2.1/changelog.html Container images are published at: https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/airflow/tags/?page=1=2.2.1 Thanks, Jed

Airflow 2.2.1 is released

-airflow/2.2.1/ Find the CHANGELOG here for more details: https://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow/2.2.1/changelog.html Container images are published at: https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/airflow/tags/?page=1=2.2.1 Thanks, Jed

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Airflow 2.2.1 from 2.2.1rc2

Hello, Apache Airflow 2.2.1 (based on RC2) has been accepted. 5 “+1” binding votes received: - Ephraim Anierobi - Kamil Breguła - Elad Kalif - Jarek Potiuk - Kaxil Naik 7 "+1" non-binding votes received: - Jed Cunningham - Kristen Malik - Drew Hubl - Dennis Akpenyi - Josh Fell -

Re: [petsc-dev] DMPLEX with VecGhost

Yeah, I think that's about true. Should the interface for this be to set a flag before creating fields (and perhaps that flag can become true by default at some point)? Barry Smith writes: > Seems like it should be possible to simply "rewrite" the cython code into > PETSc C. > > Barry >

Re: [Vo]:Researcher H. Numata dies

See: https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/thread/6682-rip-dr-hiroo-numata/

[VOTE] Release Airflow 2.2.1 from 2.2.1rc2

the artifact checksums when we actually release. Full Changelog: https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/2.2.1rc2/CHANGELOG.txt Changes since 2.2.1rc1: *Bugs*: - Fix Unexpected commit error in schedulerjob (#19213) - Add DagRun.logical_date as a property (#19198) Thanks, Jed

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.2.1 from 2.2.1rc1

A bug was found in rc1 that'll necessitate an rc2. I'm canceling this vote and will create 2.2.1rc2 soon. On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 3:51 PM Jed Cunningham wrote: > Hey fellow Airflowers, > > I have cut Airflow 2.2.1rc1. This email is calling a vote on the release, > which will last

Re: [petsc-dev] Anyone run STREAMS on an Apple M1 system?

nks, presumably we'll see the new Mac's there in a few days. BTW: the > old streams benchmark page should point to this site; google is worthless. > > I get 24 on my Intel MacBook Pro and it also saturates with 1 core. > > Barry > > >> On Oct 18, 2021, at 4:48 PM, Jed Brown

[Vo]:Researcher H. Numata dies

I regret to announce that cold fusion researcher Hiroo Numata (沼田博雄) died on October 2, 2021.

[VOTE] Release Airflow 2.2.1 from 2.2.1rc1

mp; Monitoring (#18842) - Group PATCH DAGrun together with other DAGRun endpoints (#18885) Thanks, Jed

Re: [petsc-users] Why PetscDestroy global collective semantics?

Junchao Zhang writes: > On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 9:13 PM Barry Smith wrote: > >> >> One technical reason is that PetscHeaderDestroy_Private() may call >> PetscCommDestroy() which may call MPI_Comm_free() which is defined by the >> standard to be collective. Though PETSc tries to limit its use

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1945100]

Comment on attachment 9237836 Bug 1725828 - Preload dependencies for the Widevine CDM when sandboxing it on Linux. ### ESR Uplift Approval Request * **If this is not a sec:{high,crit} bug, please state case for ESR consideration**: Widevine EME and H.264 WebRTC may be broken depending on how

[Bug 1945100]

Comment on attachment 9237836 Bug 1725828 - Preload dependencies for the Widevine CDM when sandboxing it on Linux. ### ESR Uplift Approval Request * **If this is not a sec:{high,crit} bug, please state case for ESR consideration**: Widevine EME and H.264 WebRTC may be broken depending on how

[Vo]:arpa-e LENR workshop agenda updated

This has been revised and updated: Low-Energy Nuclear Reactions Workshop October 21-22, 2021 https://arpa-e.energy.gov/events/low-energy-nuclear-reactions-workshop I think they are trying to cram too many people into their "lightning rounds." Maybe too much thunder, not enough light.

Re: [petsc-dev] Anyone run STREAMS on an Apple M1 system?

I don't have one, but this suggests it gets about 40 GB/s and can be saturated by a single core. I believe it uses two channels of LPDDR4X-4266, which has a theoretical peak of 68 GB/s. https://browser.geekbench.com/v3/cpu/8931693 The press release claims up to 400 GB/s on the Max using DDR5.

Re: [petsc-users] TS initial guess

Some methods have extrapolation options. For THETA (which includes backward Euler as theta=1), you can use -ts_theta_initial_guess_extrapolate. This type of extrapolation is sometimes unstable or may produce an invalid state, such as negative density. I'm assuming in your question that you're

Re: [Vo]:US Department of Energy (ARPA-E) LENR Workshop Oct 21-22

ever, if this workshop leads to a project at the ARPA, and if that project is well managed and fruitful, this could be important. That's a lot of "ifs," but it might happen! Hope springs eternal. - Jed

Re: [Vo]:US Department of Energy (ARPA-E) LENR Workshop Oct 21-22

Here is the program: https://arpa-e.energy.gov/events/low-energy-nuclear-reactions-workshop

[Vo]:US Department of Energy (ARPA-E) LENR Workshop Oct 21-22

-- Forwarded message - From: LENR Forum Date: Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 1:20 PM LENR Forum LENR NEWS 2021 10 13 US Department of Energy’s Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E) to hold LENR Workshop: Low-Energy Nuclear Reactions Workshop October 21-22, 2021 The objective

[ANNOUNCE] Airflow 2.2.0 is released

are published at: https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/airflow/tags/?page=1=2.2.0 Thanks, Jed

[ANNOUNCE] Airflow 2.2.0 is released

are published at: https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/airflow/tags/?page=1=2.2.0 Thanks, Jed

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Airflow 2.2.0 from 2.2.0rc1

Hello, Apache Airflow 2.2.0 (based on RC1) has been accepted. 5 “+1” binding votes received: - Ash Berlin-Taylor - Elad Kalif - Ephraim Anierobi - Kaxil Naik - Jarek Potiuk 3 "+1" non-binding votes received: - Jed Cunningham - Bas Harenslak - Dennis Akpenyi Vote th

[VOTE] Release Airflow 2.2.0 from 2.2.0rc1

-F]`` and ``[-a|-A]`` (#17816) - Queue support for ``DaskExecutor`` using Dask Worker Resources (#16829, #18720) - Make auto refresh interval configurable (#18107) Thanks, Jed

Re: [petsc-users] HDF5 corruption

Adrian Croucher writes: > hi Jed, > > It looked to me like a call to h5f_flush() is all that is required. > > Some people said there would be a performance hit (maybe ~ 10% slower), > which would be the trade-off for increased reliability. So if this were > made available

Re: [petsc-users] HDF5 corruption

Adrian Croucher writes: > hi, > > One of the users of my PETSc-based code has reported that HDF5 output > files can be corrupted and unusable if e.g. the run is killed. I've just > done a bit of reading about this and it appears to be a known issue with > HDF5. > > Some people suggest

Re: [petsc-dev] Question about the fully implicit Runge-Kutta methods (TS)

Matthew Knepley writes: > On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 12:42 AM Wang Jingyuan > wrote: > >> Dear Sir or Madam, >> >> I am a student of the University of Macau, I am trying to learn PETSc and >> I have two questions about the TSIRK. >> >> 1.PETSc 3.16.0 adds “irk" for the TSType and it offers many

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on September 30, 2021

+1 (non-binding) On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 4:48 AM Elad Kalif wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Sun, Oct 3, 2021 at 8:20 PM Josh Fell > wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> Verified a few bug fixes and regression tested with a variety of DAGs. >> >> On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 9:40 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote: >>

Re: [petsc-users] FGMRES and BCGS

It is not surprising. BCGS uses less memory for the Krylov vectors, but that might be a small fraction of the total memory used (considering your matrix and GAMG). FGMRES(30) needs 60 work vectors (2 per iteration). If you're using a linear (non-iterative) preconditioner, then you don't need a

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow Helm Chart version 1.2.0 Released

Let's try the changelog link again :) https://airflow.apache.org/docs/helm-chart/1.2.0/changelog.html

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow Helm Chart version 1.2.0 Released

Let's try the changelog link again :) https://airflow.apache.org/docs/helm-chart/1.2.0/changelog.html

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow Helm Chart version 1.2.0 Released

chart-from-sources.html  ArtifactHub: https://artifacthub.io/packages/helm/apache-airflow/airflow  Docs: https://airflow.apache.org/docs/helm-chart/1.2.0/  Changelog: https://airflow.apache.org/docs/helm-chart/1.2.0 /changelog.html Thanks to all the contributors who made this possible. Cheers, Jed

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow Helm Chart version 1.2.0 Released

chart-from-sources.html  ArtifactHub: https://artifacthub.io/packages/helm/apache-airflow/airflow  Docs: https://airflow.apache.org/docs/helm-chart/1.2.0/  Changelog: https://airflow.apache.org/docs/helm-chart/1.2.0 /changelog.html Thanks to all the contributors who made this possible. Cheers, Jed

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Airflow Helm Chart 1.2.0 based on 1.2.0rc1

Hello all, The vote to release Apache Airflow Helm Chart version 1.2.0 based on 1.2.0rc1 is now closed. The vote PASSED with 3 binding "+1", 1 non-binding "+1" and 0 "-1" votes: "+1" Binding votes: - Jarek Potiuk - Kaxil Naik - Ephraim Anierobi &qu

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow Helm Chart 1.2.0 based on 1.2.0rc1

Friendly reminder that this needs more PMC votes.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow Helm Chart 1.2.0 based on 1.2.0rc1

cX` string, so it's now simply 1.2.0. This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying the artifact checksums when we actually release. Thanks, Jed

[VOTE] Release Apache Airflow Helm Chart 1.2.0 based on 1.2.0rc1

llow us to rename the artifact without modifying the artifact checksums when we actually release. Thanks, Jed

Apache Airflow 2.2.0beta2 available for testing

) - Show Triggers table in Webserver (#17876) - Advanced Params using json-schema (#17100) - Add some basic metrics to the Triggerer (#18214) Thanks, Jed

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

ROGER ANDERTON wrote: > >>No vote is needed.<< -> so no freedom of choice > Absolutely no freedom of choice!! You are never allowed to interfere with my freedom of speech, or Facebook's, or the U.S. government's freedom of speech. The voters are not allowed to overrule the Constitution. The

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

ROGER ANDERTON wrote: government and big tech working together is fascism -> the electorate > didn't vote for that > No vote is needed. The government and big tech both have the right of free speech, and the right to do whatever they like as long as it is legal. The electorate cannot take away

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

ROGER ANDERTON wrote: they hooked me > Poor you! Maybe there is some kind YouTube addiction withdrawal support network.

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

ROGER ANDERTON wrote: more things have to pay for all adds up > Okay, so if the ads annoy you and you don't want to pay $12 a month, don't watch YouTube. No one is forcing you to watch it. I do not understand what you are complaining about.

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

ROGER ANDERTON wrote: As for the other issue -> government admits to working in partnership with > big tech to censor --> > The government and big tech have every right to work together. > The Biden administration confirms it aggressively works with Big Tech “…to > flag ‘problematic’ posts

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

ROGER ANDERTON wrote: Then "they" can up the price. Point is -> used to be free; so tried to get > people hooked on something that was free and then fleece them. > $12 a month does not seem like fleecing to me. It is more than I would be willing to pay, but a lot less than cable TV, or YouTube

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

H LV wrote: Platform, or Publisher? > If Big Tech firms want to retain valuable government protections, then > they need to get out of the censorship business. > If they are trying to shield themselves claiming "platform" rights under Code 230, that's unfair. I don't know what the story is. In

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

CB Sites wrote: Yeah, the monetization of youtube sucks. They do have to find a way to pay > for it so I just sit through a 30sec ad or two and skip the 2-15 minute > ones. But annoying as heck, I agree with. > It turns out you can get YouTube Premium for $12 a month. That eliminates the ads.

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

ROGER ANDERTON wrote: It is not their constitutional right to censor. > It most certainly is their right! Facebook or the Washington Post cannot be forced to publish an editorial they disagree with. They can censor any opinion or letter they want. If the government were to force them to publish

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

AM ROGER ANDERTON wrote: > shouldn't be allowed to be above the law and suppress freedom of speech > Freedom of speech only applies to the government. The government cannot pass a law restricting freedom of speech. YouTube, the Washington Post, FOX News or the Scientific American can restrict

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

ROGER ANDERTON wrote: Well it has been free initially, next expectation -> initially it was not > censored, can you/we expect them not to eventually censor > YouTube never said it would not be censored. They said from the start they would not allow pornography, revenge or dangerous vids. It is

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

I revised the Video Introduction page to embed the video, and I told the reader there are no subtitles in the downloadable version but the scripts are below. https://lenr-canr.org/wordpress/?page_id=1618

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

ROGER ANDERTON wrote: Not really new, its the same old trick everytime; its like how illegal > drugs are pushed -> the dealer gives you them free until you are hooked > then you have to pay; Youtube were giving a free service, now they are > looking for getting money from it. > Well, you can't

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

Oh. You learn something new every day. I see you can pay them to delete the ads for $12 a month, with YouTube Premium. This I did not know, because I am out of it. Far, far out of it. Light years away from it. - Jed On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 7:12 PM ROGER ANDERTON wrote: > Youtube has star

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.1.4 from 2.1.4rc2

+1 (non-binding) On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 6:58 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Hey All, > > +1 binding - signatures, sums, licences all work. I run it with some > example dags and it looks generally OK. > > I have not run detailed tests for all cases but I checked #18504. The > cached (not real problem

[Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

Around July of this year, the number of people viewing my video fell. Recently I watched the video and discovered that YouTube is stuffing advertisements in front of it. I guess that is why fewer people are watching it. There does not seem to be a way to override this. The "monetization" option is

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.1.4 from 2.1.4rc1

+1 (non-binding) - tested the image with the helm chart and a fresh install in a virtualenv with a (small) variety of DAGs On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 8:09 AM Ephraim Anierobi wrote: > +1(binding) Verified some issues > > > > *From: *Jarek Potiuk > *Sent: *Sunday, September 12, 2021 10:39 AM >

Re: [Vo]:Scientific Papers sign of desperation among Big pharma

Jonathan Berry wrote: It is not marginal, look at Africa, the places where they give Ivermectin > routinely has basically no Covid death spikes, the places where they don't > have the familiar looking waves. > These effects are more easily explained by demographics (many young people) and by

Re: [Vo]:Scientific Papers sign of desperation among Big pharma

Jonathan Berry wrote: Jed, You point me to a study where it was tested this way suitably, I > suspect it will have been highly flawed if that was the result. > I suspect you will say that any result you disagree with is flawed by definition. But you are missing my point. Even if we

Re: [Vo]:Scientific Papers sign of desperation among Big pharma

Terry Blanton wrote: If you are truly interested, there are currently 76 clinical studies either > on-going or completed for the efficacy of ivermectin on SARS-CoV-2. > 76 is a lot of studies! I think we can be confident that if it has any efficacy, that will be determined. A reliable,

Re: [Vo]:Scientific Papers sign of desperation among Big pharma

Terry Blanton wrote: > But effectiveness is absolutely conclusive >>> >> >> No. If that were true, it would show up in the double-blind tests. >> > > Many things work in vitro but not in the body, e.g.: > That's true too. It is important. But I was talking about a clinical double-blind test

Re: [Vo]:Scientific Papers sign of desperation among Big pharma

Jonathan Berry wrote: > Why are they pushing an experimental that contains the harmful spike > protein that has little beneficial effect and obvious harm? > COVID itself, and the common cold, both produce a million times more of these spike proteins than the vaccine does. Yet the cold does

Re: [Vo]:Scientific Papers sign of desperation among Big pharma

Jonathan Berry wrote: > But effectiveness is absolutely conclusive > No. If that were true, it would show up in the double-blind tests. Many of them have been done by proponents. None have shown more than a marginal effect, and they were probably mistakes. This is science. You have to use

Re: [Question] Allocations along 64 byte cache lines

Jorge Cardoso Leitão writes: > Yes, I expect aligned SIMD loads to be faster. > > My understanding is that we do not need an alignment requirement for this, > though: split the buffer in 3, [unaligned][aligned][unaligned], use aligned > loads for the middle and un-aligned (or not even SIMD) for

Re: [Vo]:Scientific Papers sign of desperation among Big pharma

Jürg Wyttenbach wrote: > We no longer need any Ivermectin studies as we have real data from > 1'000'000'000 people that now no longer worry CoV-19. > Leading Indian epidemiologists say there is no evidence that ivermectin had an effect in India. They were interviewed in the New York Times and

Re: Arrow in HPC

Yibo Cai writes: > HPC infrastructure normally leverages RDMA for fast data transfer among > storage nodes and compute nodes. Computation tasks are dispatched to > compute nodes with best fit resources. > > Concretely, we are investigating porting UCX as Flight transport layer. > UCX is a

Re: [petsc-dev] NVIDIA licensing

On Mon, Sep 6, 2021, at 7:16 PM, Barry Smith wrote: > > * We should also add some text to LICENSE indicating certain files have > additional copyrights indicated at the top of the individual file.* > ** Copyright is held by hundreds of individuals and organizations. I'm not a fan of having

Re: [petsc-users] Mat preallocation in case of variable stencils

Matteo Semplice writes: > Hi. > > We are writing a code for a FD scheme on an irregular domain and thus > the local stencil is quite variable: we have inner nodes, boundary nodes > and inactive nodes, each with their own stencil type and offset with > respect to the grid node. We currently

Re: New PMC Members: Ephraim Anierobi & Elad Kalif

Congrats Ephraim and Elad! On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 8:02 AM gabrielleebuaa wrote: > Congrats > Replied Message > From Jarek Potiuk > Date 08/31/2021 21:43 > To dev@airflow.apache.org > Subject Re: New PMC Members: Ephraim Anierobi & Elad Kalif > VERY WELL DESERVED! Congrats! >

Re: New Committer: Brent Bovenzi

Congrats Brent  On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 2:16 PM Tomasz Urbaszek wrote: > Congrats Brent!

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Provider [cncf.kubernetes] prepared on August 24, 2021

+1 (non-binding) On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 6:27 AM Kaxil Naik wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 1:06 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > >> Hey all, >> >> I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is >> calling a vote on the release, >> which will last for 72 hours

Re: [petsc-users] Static Library based app for petsc

PETSc does not "wrap" cout. Creating a library first, with an executable front-end that most/all initial users will use is generally good design. More users of the library emerge as people try to do more advanced/custom things that are not appropriate to do with the executable. "Abhishek

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.1.3 from RC1

+1 (non-binding) Gave it a spin in a fresh install and with the helm chart. Only issue I ran into was the find command in the log groomer ( https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17739), but that's already fixed and won't be an issue. On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 2:34 PM Xiaodong Deng wrote: > +1

Re: [petsc-users] Reaching limit number of communicator with Spectrum MPI

Junchao Zhang writes: > Hi, Feimi, > I need to consult Jed (cc'ed). > Jed, is this an example of > https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/htdig/petsc-dev/2018-April/thread.html#22663? > If Feimi really can not free matrices, then we just need to attach a > hypre-comm to

Re: [petsc-users] malloc error

"Jorti, Zakariae via petsc-users" writes: > Hello, > > > I am using TSSolve to solve a linear problem. > > In the FormIJacobian function that I provide to TSSetIJacobian, I first set > the coefficients of both J and Jpre matrices the same way (J and Jpre > matrices are equal in the first

Re: Airflow-Init stuck at initialization

Your SQL_ALCHEMY_CONN doesn't have a password? Intentional? Did you redact that and forget to replace it with `{pass}`? On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 9:26 AM Anthony Joyce < anthony.jo...@omicronmedia.com> wrote: > Sorry, that was on purpose. I redacted the host name and substituted for > {host}. > >

Re: Bookshare experience

Besides book share, what's the best way to get audio books that are narrated? Cheers, Jed On 8/11/21, Andy Baracco wrote: > Bookshare is great. Yes, it costs $50 per year, and you keep what you > download, and the neat thing is that if you somehow lose a book you have you > > c

[Vo]:Bridging the Gaps: An Anthology on Nuclear Cold Fusion Kindle Edition

Bridging the Gaps: An Anthology on Nuclear Cold Fusion Kindle Edition by Randolph R. Davis Published 2021 https://www.amazon.com/Bridging-Gaps-Anthology-Nuclear-Fusion-ebook/dp/B097465MT5

Re: Bookshare experience

Hey guys, So I'm guessing their app is pretty accessible? I've never used book share, so curious how it works. Are these audio books, in the sense they are narrated or no. On 8/11/21, Richard Turner wrote: > The higher quality voices from Ivona give the closest to human like speech > in my

Re: [petsc-users] Is PetscSFBcast deterministic (just checking, I assume it is)

>> On Jul 29, 2021, at 11:45 AM, Jed Brown wrote: >> >> Provided it's the same SF, yes. (We use MPI_Waitall instead of MPI_Waitsome >> or this, though we may be able to shave some time using MPI_Waitsome.) >> >> Matrix assembly from the stash is a common pla

Re: [petsc-users] Is PetscSFBcast deterministic (just checking, I assume it is)

Provided it's the same SF, yes. (We use MPI_Waitall instead of MPI_Waitsome or this, though we may be able to shave some time using MPI_Waitsome.) Matrix assembly from the stash is a common place; try -matstash_reproduce. Mark Adams writes: > GAMG is not deterministic and I'm trying to figure

Re: [petsc-users] is PETSc's random deterministic?

Barry Smith writes: > As we are moving the PETSc docs to petsc.org there may > be a bit of time before google again automatically finds the most appropriate > page. At the moment google and duckduckgo seem terribly confused. The 301 Redirects are evidently still missing.

[Vo]:NASA and LENR

The FAA's top space official outlines progress — NASA does a deep dive on potential power sources for a moon base, including “cold fusion.” https://www.politico.com/newsletters/politico-space/2021/07/23/the-faas-top-space-official-outlines-progress-493703 Frontiers of Space Power and Energy

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow Helm Chart 1.1.0 based on 1.1.0rc1

+1 (non-binding) Ran through a few tests and all looks good. On Sun, Jul 25, 2021 at 7:10 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > +1 (binding) > > * Checked signatures, shasums, licences - all look good. > * Used the binary package to install airflow in my local K8S cluster and > run a few basic tests with

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.1.2 from RC1

+1 (non-binding) On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 11:29 AM Elad Kalif wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Sun, Jul 11, 2021 at 11:02 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> * Verified licences, signatures, shasums. I corrected a minor problem >> with sha512sum files (they were containing "dist/"

Re: [petsc-users] [SLEPc] Computing Smallest Eigenvalue+Eigenvector of Many Small Matrices

Have you tried just calling LAPACK directly? (You could try dsyevx to see if there's something to gain by computing less than all the eigenvalues.) I'm not aware of a batched interface at this time, but that's what you'd want for performance. Jacob Faibussowitsch writes: > Hello PETSc/SLEPc

Re: [petsc-users] MatNest with Shell blocks for multipysics

Matteo Semplice writes: > Hi. > > We are designing a PETSc application that will employ a SNES solver on a > multiphysics problem whose jacobian will have a 2x2 block form, say > A=[A00,A01;A10,A11]. We already have code for the top left block A_00 (a > MatShell and a related Shell

Re: [petsc-users] Scatter parallel Vec to sequential Vec on non-zeroth process

Peder Jørgensgaard Olesen writes: > Each process is assigned an indexed subset of the tasks (the tasks are of > constant size), and, for each task index, the relevant data is scattered as a > SEQVEC to the process (this is done for all processes in each step, using an > adaption of the code

Re: [petsc-users] Scatter parallel Vec to sequential Vec on non-zeroth process

Peder Jørgensgaard Olesen via petsc-users writes: > I'm distributing a set of independent tasks over different processes, so I'm > afraid sending everything to the zeroth process would rather thoroughly > defeat the purpose of what I'm doing. It sounds like you're going to run this a

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.1.1 from RC1

+1 (non-binding) On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 3:50 AM Ash Berlin-Taylor wrote: > +1 (binding) because I didn't actually cast it yet :D > > I think since the CeleryKubernetesExecutor behaviour is not a regression > from 2.1.0, combined with Kaxil finding a workaround that it is worth > carrying on

<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >