To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43146
User mmp changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43146
User mmp changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43146
User mmp changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43146
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 8 04:47:04 -0700
2005 ---
hmmm... 33307 is about a new shortcut... Better than nothing, but not quite
the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43146
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 8 04:55:50 -0700
2005 ---
erm. we already had this issue closed as duplicate to issue about a shortcut
(and
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43146
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 8 04:57:46 -0700
2005 ---
The best solution would be
a) optimal view with no shortcuts for reader (someone
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43146
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 8 05:03:18 -0700
2005 ---
If I understand the specs-doc correct, the point is:
- avarage user is confused
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43146
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 8 05:09:59 -0700
2005 ---
The option Editing view in OOo1.1x (ToolsOptionsOpenOffice.orgView) was an
all or
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43146
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 8 05:10:04 -0700
2005 ---
and what's wrong with
- option to choose wether automatically restore editing
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43146
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 8 05:22:33 -0700
2005 ---
This might work as an interims solution. But from my point of view it is too
much
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43146
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 8 05:23:36 -0700
2005 ---
set parent
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43146
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 8 05:34:35 -0700
2005 ---
As far as I'm aware, not mentioned before, is the great advantage for using
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43146
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 8 05:45:46 -0700
2005 ---
As far as I expect: yes. But I doupt that all template users know the shortcut
to
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43146
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 8 06:01:32 -0700
2005 ---
Long time ago, when I worked on automating corporate styles in MsO, we had a
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43146
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 8 06:15:02 -0700
2005 ---
This might work as an interims solution. ... A general option does not address
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43146
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 8 08:23:41 -0700
2005 ---
It's senseful to reduce the amount of Issues by marking them as duplicates and
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43146
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 8 08:54:49 -0700
2005 ---
Hi gang!
so many good arguments - I'd like to tune in and sing the song of the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43146
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 8 09:56:28 -0700
2005 ---
Hi mmp, *
you wrote:
Suggestion:
i43146 is no longer a dup of i33307
Target
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43146
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 8 10:25:44 -0700
2005 ---
cornouws touched on another example of why the current (1.1) functionality is
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43146
User cloph changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43146
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 8 12:14:30 -0700
2005 ---
... Software should support the work of the user. I, as user experience
engineer,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43146
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 8 12:41:50 -0700
2005 ---
Another consideration: what happens when someone doesn't know the shortcuts?
You
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43146
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 8 13:18:02 -0700
2005 ---
Furthermore: if I do send a document to others in an editable form, and do not
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43146
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 8 18:06:57 -0700
2005 ---
I filed this issue a while ago, and it is so clear to me that I don't understand
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43146
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 6 11:20:30 -0700
2005 ---
I would like to keep the possability to get to the latest position/mutation by
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43146
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 5 07:21:04 -0700
2005 ---
To my opinion the bias towards the reader, vs. the writer, is wrong. Indeed,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43146
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 21 13:15:51 -0700
2005 ---
*** Issue 48430 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43146
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 12 02:48:10 -0700
2005 ---
*** Issue 48871 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43146
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 10 07:05:29 -0700
2005 ---
sba, it makes sense to change the default if majority of users would prefer
other
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43146
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 10 09:05:51 -0700
2005 ---
I agree with othr. In my experience OO.o is used for editing and
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43146
User sba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43146
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 9 22:17:08 -0700
2005 ---
Glad to hear the functionality is being reconsidered. The default can be start
at
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43146
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 29 03:13:28 -0700
2005 ---
Would very much like to retain the option where the cursor moves to the
location
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43146
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 14 07:15:25 -0800
2005 ---
*** Issue 44993 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43146
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 10 17:54:56 -0800
2005 ---
I had the same problem (not saving cursor position) with OOo 1.0 and helped
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43146
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 3 05:22:32 -0800
2005 ---
*** Issue 43993 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43146
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 3 05:32:18 -0800
2005 ---
I agree dcarrera: A setting for this behaviour would be the best solution.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43146
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 3 05:37:02 -0800
2005 ---
Some of you may think this is not a big issue. But you must see this from the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43146
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 3 05:39:47 -0800
2005 ---
(Maybe an interesiting alternative would be to keep old behaviour and adding an
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43146
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 3 05:43:18 -0800
2005 ---
(forget my last comment. this could be achieved by setting the cursor at the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43146
User mru changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43146
User es changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43146
User es changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43146
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 21 07:20:22 -0800
2005 ---
um. duplicate ? again ?
maybe my english is _that_ bad ?
i believe this not a
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43146
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 21 07:30:09 -0800
2005 ---
I believe this is all the same. It's about the whole design of this feature:
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43146
User peschtra changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43146
User peschtra changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43146
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 20 23:01:48 -0800
2005 ---
this really is a useful feature that i got used to - but it felt so natural
that
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43146
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 19 13:26:57 -0800
2005 ---
I think that remembering the cursor position is a *very* *useful* feature. The
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43146
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 19 13:28:56 -0800
2005 ---
Here's a suggestion:
Can this feature be made into a setting? You can have it
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43146
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 19 14:19:50 -0800
2005 ---
I'll just copy my comment from issue 39486:
Don't keep it. Revert the feature to
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43146
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 19 15:51:55 -0800
2005 ---
In response to Daniel's second comment, I would like to again point out that his
52 matches
Mail list logo