Re: out of holding space in degraded mode

2018-09-20 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 18:38:11 +, Ryan, Lyle (US) wrote: > I have now cut the dumpcycle down to 10, and the tapecycle down to 20, and > was hoping Amanda could recover. > But I'm still getting "out of holding space in degraded mode" in the logs, > and Amanda seems t

Re: out of holding space in degraded mode

2018-08-30 Thread Jens Berg
Hi Lyle, > under tapetype: length=5000GB and part-size=1GB did you really define 5000GB (= 5TB) per tape? If you instructed amanda to create vtapes on the fly and you really use the above tape length then you'll run out of disc space quite quickly... BRs, Jens

AW: out of holding space in degraded mode

2018-08-29 Thread Ingo Schaefer
Hello Lyle, > Using Amanda 3.4.5 on Centos 7.4 to backup Linux  > clients onto 11TB of local disk.   Holding area and vtapes > are all in the > same 11TB filesystem, which is now entirely > full! I remember that the documentation contained a warning about that. Holding disk should be an

Re: out of holding space in degraded mode

2018-08-29 Thread Olivier
ot = 30 > under tapetype: length=5000GB and part-size=1GB > > I have now cut the dumpcycle down to 10, and the tapecycle down to 20, and > was hoping Amanda could recover. > But I'm still getting "out of holding space in degraded mode" in the logs, > and Amanda seems total

out of holding space in degraded mode

2018-08-29 Thread Ryan, Lyle (US)
-size=1GB I have now cut the dumpcycle down to 10, and the tapecycle down to 20, and was hoping Amanda could recover. But I'm still getting "out of holding space in degraded mode" in the logs, and Amanda seems totally stuck. How would I start over, throw away all the backups made so far,

Re: full dump in degraded mode - possible?

2013-03-29 Thread C.Scheeder
Am 29.03.2013 06:30, schrieb Kamil Jońca: As far I know amanda does not do full dump when no tape (vtape in my case) is not available. Is there any way to force it? If not what is the rationale for this? (I would prefer keep disk with vtapes as short as possible turned on) KJ Hm, what about

Re: full dump in degraded mode - possible?

2013-03-29 Thread Kamil Jońca
C.Scheeder christ...@scheeder.de writes: Am 29.03.2013 06:30, schrieb Kamil Jońca: As far I know amanda does not do full dump when no tape (vtape in my case) is not available. Is there any way to force it? If not what is the rationale for this? (I would prefer keep disk with vtapes as

Re: All DLEs failed [can't dump in degraded mode]

2012-11-24 Thread Toomas Aas
Hello again! mail.tarkvarastuudio.ee / lev 1 FAILED [can't dump in degraded mode] I can't understand why Amanda goes to degraded mode. OK, this is another of these cases where you can't find the answer on Google until 1 minute *after* you post to the list. Turns out this is a known

All DLEs failed [can't dump in degraded mode]

2012-11-23 Thread Toomas Aas
: mail.tarkvarastuudio.ee / lev 1 FAILED [can't dump in degraded mode] I can't understand why Amanda goes to degraded mode. The disk containing vtapes is definitely available. I can successfully run this command: su backup -c touch /backup/slot2/testfile Also, amcheck shows

Re: Incorrectly out of holding space in degraded mode

2011-01-22 Thread Douglas K. Rand
Jean-Louis There is a bug if the taper crash early, the attached Jean-Louis patch fix, the dump should go to holding disk. Doug Thanks. I'll try it tonight. That patch to driver.c fixes the problem of no dumps happening when in degraded mode. Thanks.

Re: Incorrectly out of holding space in degraded mode

2011-01-21 Thread Jean-Louis Martineau
) { log_add(L_WARNING, _(going into degraded mode because of taper component error.)); @@ -1925,6 +1926,7 @@ handle_taper_result( } } while(areads_dataready(taper_fd)); +start_some_dumps(runq); startaflush(); }

Incorrectly out of holding space in degraded mode

2011-01-20 Thread Douglas K. Rand
I'm using Amanda 3.2.1 on FreeBSD 8.1 and last night I did a stoopid thing with my tape changer which caused Amanda to fall into degraded mode. I found a nit and then a problem where none of my backups were done. First the nit. From amreport: The next 2 tapes Amanda expects to use are: daily

Re: Amanda error: no-hold disk in degraded mode

2007-04-26 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Adriana Liendo schrieb: Hello, Do you have any idea why amanda gives the following error.. FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY: sunblade /seisan/seismo lev 4 FAILED [can't dump no-hold disk in degraded mode] sunblade / lev 2 FAILED [can't dump no-hold disk in degraded mode] Yes, we

Re: Amanda error: no-hold disk in degraded mode

2007-04-26 Thread Paul Bijnens
On 2007-04-26 14:04, Adriana Liendo wrote: Hello, Do you have any idea why amanda gives the following error.. FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY: sunblade /seisan/seismo lev 4 FAILED [can't dump no-hold disk in degraded mode] sunblade / lev 2 FAILED [can't dump no-hold disk

no holding disk degraded mode

2006-08-21 Thread Cyrille Bollu
me should be able to bypass the holding disk during normal operation while keeping the fallback feature it provides in degraded mode. That's why I think Amanda should use the holding disk in degraded mode even if the dumptype has the option holdingdisk no. What do you think? Maybe I could patch one

Re: no holding disk degraded mode

2006-08-18 Thread Cyrille Bollu
holding disk. Well, there's one defined actually but none of my DLE use it. ... However, I have enough place to store a few degraded backups should it be needed. And I would like to take advantage of the degraded mode while keeping my holdingdisk no option

no holding disk degraded mode

2006-08-17 Thread Cyrille Bollu
dumptype define dumptype usual-local { global comment Usual dumptype holdingdisk no } The problem is that Amanda doesn't write incremental-only backups on the holding disk when in degraded mode: *** A TAPE ERROR OCCURRED: [cannot overwrite active tape daily-backup06

Re: no holding disk degraded mode

2006-08-17 Thread Jon LaBadie
to take advantage of the degraded mode while keeping my holdingdisk no option Is there something else I have to configure or is this an intended behaviour of Amanda? holdingdisk yes reserve 100 # the default -- Jon H. LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED] JG

Re: no holding disk degraded mode

2006-08-17 Thread Cyrille Bollu
to store a few degraded backups should it be needed. And I would like to take advantage of the degraded mode while keeping my holdingdisk no option Is there something else I have to configure or is this an intended behaviour of Amanda? holdingdisk yes Yes, but I don't want

Re: no holding disk degraded mode

2006-08-17 Thread Jon LaBadie
of my DLE use it. ... However, I have enough place to store a few degraded backups should it be needed. And I would like to take advantage of the degraded mode while keeping my holdingdisk no option Is there something else I have to configure or is this an intended

Re: Why no incrementals in degraded mode?

2006-01-25 Thread Josef Wolf
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 08:51:34AM -0500, Jean-Louis Martineau wrote: What was your version? 2.4.5 If you upgraded from 2.4.4p2 or earlier to a 2.4.5 then could you try the untested attached patch. The patch seems to help. Thanks! Is this a new problem or is it already fixed in CVS?

Why no incrementals in degraded mode?

2006-01-20 Thread Josef Wolf
Hello! Since I have re-installed amanda, I get no more incrementals when it runs into degraded mode. From the logfiles I can't find any hint why it always does full-backups. All DLEs are affected by this problem. But in the description below, I list only one DLE. Here is what amadmin info

Re: Why no incrementals in degraded mode?

2006-01-20 Thread Paul Bijnens
Josef Wolf wrote: Hello! Since I have re-installed amanda, I get no more incrementals when it runs into degraded mode. From the logfiles I can't find any hint why it always does full-backups. All DLEs are affected by this problem. But in the description below, I list only one DLE. OK, you

Re: Why no incrementals in degraded mode?

2006-01-20 Thread Jean-Louis Martineau
-installed amanda, I get no more incrementals when it runs into degraded mode. From the logfiles I can't find any hint why it always does full-backups. All DLEs are affected by this problem. But in the description below, I list only one DLE. Index: server-src/driver.c

Re: Why no incrementals in degraded mode?

2006-01-20 Thread Josef Wolf
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 02:25:41PM +0100, Paul Bijnens wrote: Since I have re-installed amanda, I get no more incrementals when it runs into degraded mode. From the logfiles I can't find any hint why it always does full-backups. All DLEs are affected by this problem. But in the description

Re: File-driver: degraded mode

2005-04-27 Thread Matt Hyclak
that my holding-disk is full and some backups failed because of that. The reason is amanda is running on degraded mode. The output of amcheck verifies that: Holding disk /opt/amanda-holding: 11179172 KB disk space available, that's plenty amcheck-server: slot 7: date 20050422 label daily7

Re: File-driver: degraded mode

2005-04-27 Thread Kuas
Actually, that's not true. It goes by your tapecycle setting. You have a tapecycle of 9 tapes, and only 8 tapes are labeled for some reason (as you noted, tape 4 is missing), so amanda will not overwrite tapes until you've used 9. If you label tape 4, then amanda should start cycling through

File-driver: degraded mode

2005-04-26 Thread kuas
reuse 20050422 daily1 reuse 20050422 daily3 reuse 20050422 daily2 reuse 20050422 daily9 reuse But, I just realize that my holding-disk is full and some backups failed because of that. The reason is amanda is running on degraded mode. The output of amcheck verifies that: Holding disk /opt/amanda

Re: File-driver: degraded mode

2005-04-26 Thread Frank Smith
is running on degraded mode. The output of amcheck verifies that: Holding disk /opt/amanda-holding: 11179172 KB disk space available, that's plenty amcheck-server: slot 7: date 20050422 label daily7 (active tape) amcheck-server: slot 8: date 20050422 label daily8 (active tape) amcheck-server

Re: File-driver: degraded mode

2005-04-26 Thread Kuas
is amanda is running on degraded mode. The output of amcheck verifies that: Holding disk /opt/amanda-holding: 11179172 KB disk space available, that's plenty amcheck-server: slot 7: date 20050422 label daily7 (active tape) amcheck-server: slot 8: date 20050422 label daily8 (active tape) amcheck-server

driver going to degraded mode

2004-12-18 Thread Kai Zimmer
on device taper: retrying lore:/local/home/moshkow.0 on new tape: [writing file: No space left on device] driver: going into degraded mode because of tape error. ... I had similar problems under 2.4.4p2 and hoped they were resolved in this version, but now i'm not sure what the real problem

Re: driver going to degraded mode

2004-12-18 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 09:35:04PM +0100, Kai Zimmer wrote: Hi, i'm using amanda 2.4.4p4 on linux/solaris. Today my backup stopped (or better slowed down) and the taper didn't work anymore. At least that's what it looked like when i used amstatus. After some hours i killed all amanda

Re: driver going to degraded mode

2004-12-18 Thread Kai Zimmer
208.603 file mark 1.524}] ... FATAL taper syncpipe_put: Broken pipe WARNING driver going into degraded mode because of tape error. snap Could this Broken pipe have come from me killing the taper process after it got stuck? What a pity

Degraded mode with changer broken?

2004-04-13 Thread Josef Wolf
when called from amdump. When called from amflush the changer behaves as usual. The idea here is to have full backups once in a week (I know I need _not_ to error out once in a week, but this is a different story) and let degraded mode collect incrementals. The problem now is that when

Re: Degraded mode with changer broken?

2004-04-13 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 08:35:34PM +0200, Josef Wolf wrote: Hello. ... So what am I doing wrong? Is degraded mode in conjunction with a changer meant to work at all? I don't think degraded mode has anything to do with changer. Degraded mode is a much misused term. No tape DOES NOT mean

Urgent help needed, degraded mode, tapes too small ?

2004-01-27 Thread Oliver Simon
Hi Group ! This smorning we got the problem, that many servers were backuped in degraded mode (host /disk lev 1 FAILED). I think this means, the defined hdd-tapes became too small, right ? 1) We have 17 tapes defined each one with 75000 MB. Can I expand this to 10 MB without loosing

Re: Urgent help needed, degraded mode, tapes too small ?

2004-01-27 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Hi, Oliver, on Dienstag, 27. Jänner 2004 at 12:32 you wrote to amanda-users: OS This smorning we got the problem, that many servers were backuped in OS degraded mode (host /disk lev 1 FAILED). I think this means, the OS defined hdd-tapes became too small, right ? Degraded means

Re: Urgent help needed, degraded mode, tapes too small ?

2004-01-27 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 12:32:06PM +0100, Oliver Simon wrote: Hi Group ! This smorning we got the problem, that many servers were backuped in degraded mode (host /disk lev 1 FAILED). I think this means, the defined hdd-tapes became too small, right ? 1) We have 17 tapes defined each one

Re: Urgent help needed, degraded mode, tapes too small ?

2004-01-27 Thread Oliver Simon
Hi again ... Am Di, 2004-01-27 um 16.43 schrieb Jon LaBadie: On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 12:32:06PM +0100, Oliver Simon wrote: Hi Group ! This smorning we got the problem, that many servers were backuped in degraded mode (host /disk lev 1 FAILED). I think this means, the defined hdd

Re: Urgent help needed, degraded mode, tapes too small ?

2004-01-27 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 05:52:25PM +0100, Oliver Simon wrote: Hi again ... Am Di, 2004-01-27 um 16.43 schrieb Jon LaBadie: On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 12:32:06PM +0100, Oliver Simon wrote: Hi Group ! This smorning we got the problem, that many servers were backuped in degraded

degraded mode

2003-12-12 Thread Brian Cuttler
Hello amanda users, We seem to have run out of spool area on this system last night (this is the system we recently upgraded from DLT7000 to SDLT220). I'd have expected either a delay in processing or use of degraded mode rather than a failure to backup the partition (degraded is direct to tape

Re: degraded mode

2003-12-12 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 at 8:55am, Brian Cuttler wrote We seem to have run out of spool area on this system last night That's only one of your problems... I'd have expected either a delay in processing or use of degraded mode rather than a failure to backup the partition (degraded is direct

Re: degraded mode

2003-12-12 Thread Brian Cuttler
a delay in processing or use of degraded mode rather than a failure to backup the partition (degraded is direct to tape, right ?) No -- degraded is when there's no tape and dumps go to the holding disk. *** A TAPE ERROR OCCURRED: [not an amanda tape]. This is your problem. Amanda didn't

Re: degraded mode

2003-12-12 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 at 9:23am, Brian Cuttler wrote I know this is a loaded question... but why do I have it in my head that if there is no spool area dumps will run anyway (although rather slowly) dumping directly to tape. Did I just make that up or is/was there some truth to it ? You

Re: degraded mode

2003-12-12 Thread Brian Cuttler
Joshua, If the holding disk fills during a run, will amanda switch to no-holding disk mode or will it fail partitions that haven't yet dumped ? ie: situation I wrote about a couple of days ago. Two amanda servers running concurrently, one for local disk used what it wanted of the /amanda/work

Re: degraded mode

2003-12-12 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 at 9:57am, Brian Cuttler wrote If the holding disk fills during a run, will amanda switch to no-holding disk mode or will it fail partitions that haven't yet dumped ? It should flush the stuff on disk to tape before it starts any dumps that won't fit in the available

Re: degraded mode

2003-12-12 Thread Eric Siegerman
On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 10:11:51AM -0500, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: In your situation, I would setup the config that backs up the server itself to not use the holding disk. On a local only config, it doesn't really buy you much speed, so why bother? A holding disk still buys you

degraded mode

2003-11-17 Thread Barry Haycock
I am getting the following error when backing up multiple disks on a sun box FAIL driver hostname /dev/rdsk/c0t1d0s7 2003112 2 [cant dump no-hold disk in degraded mode] This error occurs on all backups while all other file systems are being backed up fine What is degraded mode

Re: degraded mode

2003-11-17 Thread Eric Siegerman
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 12:52:04PM +1100, Barry Haycock wrote: FAIL driver hostname /dev/rdsk/c0t1d0s7 2003112 2 [can't dump no-hold disk in degraded mode] [...] What is degraded mode? It's what happens when there's no tape in the drive, or no more room on the tape, or for whatever other

Re: degraded mode

2003-11-17 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 10:35:28PM -0500, Eric Siegerman wrote: On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 12:52:04PM +1100, Barry Haycock wrote: FAIL driver hostname /dev/rdsk/c0t1d0s7 2003112 2 [can't dump no-hold disk in degraded mode] [...] What is degraded mode? It's what happens when there's

Re: degraded mode

2003-02-13 Thread Toomas Aas
Hi! Since this left /amanda/work as unavailable I'd have expected amanda to have run in degraded mode writing directly to the tape drive, however amanda reported that there was no more room in the work area and exited without performing any dumps at all. Isn't the term 'degraded mode' used

Re: degraded mode

2003-02-13 Thread Brian Cuttler
, Brian Hi! Since this left /amanda/work as unavailable I'd have expected amanda to have run in degraded mode writing directly to the tape drive, however amanda reported that there was no more room in the work area and exited without performing any dumps at all. Isn't

degraded mode

2003-02-12 Thread Brian Cuttler
as unavailable I'd have expected amanda to have run in degraded mode writing directly to the tape drive, however amanda reported that there was no more room in the work area and exited without performing any dumps at all. It was a stupid mistake on my part, now corrected. I was just surprised

forcing amanda to not go into degraded mode

2002-10-31 Thread Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom
, to tell amanda don't go into degraded mode when dumping to disk after a tape error? Carl Soderstrom. -- Systems Administrator Real-Time Enterprises www.real-time.com

Re: forcing amanda to not go into degraded mode

2002-10-31 Thread Frank Smith
can run amflush the next morning when I come in. (we don't have a tape changer, and backups need to be automated, so chg-manual isn't an option as I understand its usage). is there some setting that I'm missing, to tell amanda don't go into degraded mode when dumping to disk after a tape error

Re: forcing amanda to not go into degraded mode

2002-10-31 Thread Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom
You've got it backwards, the 10% you reserved is used for fulls, the other 90% is used for incrementals. hmmm, the comments read completely the opposite of that, but I'll give it a try. thanks much! Carl Soderstrom. -- Systems Administrator Real-Time Enterprises www.real-time.com

Re: forcing amanda to not go into degraded mode

2002-10-31 Thread Doug Meredith
From: Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] however, when the dump runs, I get the ever-popular: lev 0 FAILED [dumps too big, but cannot incremental dump skip-incr disk] I don't think Amanda is telling you that the level 0 won't fit on the holding disk. It is telling you that it won't fit

Re: forcing amanda to not go into degraded mode

2002-10-31 Thread Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom
I don't think Amanda is telling you that the level 0 won't fit on the holding disk. It is telling you that it won't fit on the tape. no, in that case it usually gives the 'dumps too big for tape' error message. If you want to have Amanda backup more than will fit on the tape and

Re: forcing amanda to not go into degraded mode

2002-10-31 Thread Frank Smith
--On Thursday, October 31, 2002 16:14:28 -0600 Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't think Amanda is telling you that the level 0 won't fit on the holding disk. It is telling you that it won't fit on the tape. no, in that case it usually gives the 'dumps too big for

Re: forcing amanda to not go into degraded mode

2002-10-31 Thread Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom
If you have enough holding disk, don't configure a changer and specify an absurdly large tapetype. tried that. 40GB should be enough to hold everything, but I'll turn it up to 70GB (size of the holding disk). Then Amanda will do all the backups required and give you an EOT error in

Re: undesired level 0 in degraded mode

2001-08-31 Thread John R. Jackson
:-). If you'll send me that amdump.NN file (I think that's all I need), I'll see if the fix is within reason. It might just be that amstatus doesn't understand degraded mode. More likely, though, is that some key message it needed was corrupted and there isn't much it can do. I have a TODO item to see

undesired level 0 in degraded mode

2001-08-15 Thread peanut butter
Hi, I'm trying to figure out why I still get level 0 dumps when in degraded mode (no tape available). I took the default of 100% for the reserve parameter first being that the result, as I understand it to be, is as I desire. When Amanda would still run level 0's on some machines in degraded

Re: undesired level 0 in degraded mode

2001-08-15 Thread John R. Jackson
promote: moving sabre:/biff up, total_lev0 3390062, total_size 3574492 That would not affect degraded mode. reserving 8335017 out of 8335017 for degraded-mode dumps cass150amgetconf hea_daily reserve 100 OK, that all fits and says no level 0's should be done in degraded mode. Shows

Re: undesired level 0 in degraded mode

2001-08-15 Thread peanut butter
Whoops. I noticed retroactively that the level stated for sabre:/biff in the after start degraded mode schedule is level 7. There is a 0 in that row and looking too quickly I mistook that for the dump level column. I noticed this after discovering that the file created on the holding disk

Re: undesired level 0 in degraded mode

2001-08-15 Thread peanut butter
detection for a tape and degraded mode. Look for reserving ... for degraded-mode dumps in your amdump file. How much did it reserve? What does amgetconf config reserve say (just to confirm your grep). reserving 8335017 out of 8335017 for degraded-mode dumps cass150amgetconf hea_daily reserve

Re: undesired level 0 in degraded mode

2001-08-13 Thread John R. Jackson
Hi, I'm trying to figure out why I still get level 0 dumps when in degraded mode (no tape available). Look for reserving ... for degraded-mode dumps in your amdump file. How much did it reserve? What does amgetconf config reserve say (just to confirm your grep). Look for result ... from taper