Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
-Messaggio originale-
Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:amavis-user-
Gary V wrote:
I am doing some tests on a Debian machine with the Debian 2.4.2
package and the postfixadmin vacation.pl script and I noticed that
because the vacation program sends a
Wilson Kwok wrote:
Hello,
I using Postfix + Amavisd + Clamav + Spamassassin
The Amavisd can detect virus and will delete it, but i have troble on spam
mail,
the following is the maillog that have Passed SPAM message, but I don't
how to configure the spam to be delete,
Wilson Kwok wrote:
Hello,
I using Postfix + Amavisd + Clamav + Spamassassin
The Amavisd can detect virus and will delete it, but i have troble on spam
mail,
the following is the maillog that have Passed SPAM message, but I don't
how to configure the spam to be delete,
Martin Schiøtz wrote:
On 5/10/07, Jeremy Laidman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Schiøtz wrote:
Is it possible with postfix only to send incoming mails to amavisd-new
and outgoing mails without configuring two ip-addresses on the server?
I think you're asking if outbound
Bill Landry wrote:
Jeremy Laidman wrote the following on 5/10/2007 3:40 PM -0800:
Bill Landry wrote:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
...
check_client_access pcre:/etc/postfix/filter_outbound
permit_mynetworks
permit_sasl_authenticated
check_client_access
Jeremy Laidman wrote:
Hi
Has anyone shoehorned amavis-new to do compliance policy such as required for
HIPAA? By this I mean detecting keywords within a message that suggest
leakage of personal information (medical records, social security numbers and
the like).
does compliance
Colin Viebrock wrote:
[snip]
virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/maps/virtual,regexp:/etc/
postfix/maps/mylists-regex, hash:/etc/postfix/maps/mylists, hash:/var/
lib/mailman/data/virtual-mailman, proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql/
virtual_alias_maps.cf
make sure these don't
Pickel, Gerd - Betax-Systems GmbH (IT) wrote:
Hello,
we run a mailserver on Debian etch (amd64) with amavisd-new (Version:
1:2.4.2-6.1) and exim4 (Version: 4.63-17).
Yesterday suddenly no incoming mails were delivered to the local account from
where we grap these mails with our jana server
boricua wrote:
On Sat, 10 Feb 2007 01:38:39 +0100
Mark Martinec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
boricua,
i run clamd as daemon and during the sample test i get this error when
sending a spam
(!)run_av (ClamAV-clamd, built-in i/f): Too many retries to talk to
/var/run/clamav/clamd
boricua wrote:
# grep LocalSocket /etc/clamd.conf
(adjust the clamd.conf depending on your system).
then use the path you see in amavid.conf.
bash-3.1# grep -i localsock /etc/clamd.conf
LocalSocket /var/run/clamav-milter/clamd.sock
when i change that to
Elvar wrote:
Hello,
I have the following rules set up to ensure outbound mail is not
filtered for spam including mail originating from the box itself.
@mynetworks = qw( 127.0.0.0/8 [::1] [FE80::]/10 [FEC0::]/10
10.0.0.0/8 172.30.1.0/24 192.168.0.0/16 );
Henry wrote:
How can I redirect detected spam email to be sen to user mailboxes
but not in their inbox, instead their spam folder?
use maildrop or procmail.
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web
Henrik Krohns wrote:
On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 01:43:27AM +0100, mouss wrote:
grant maxwell wrote:
It would be very simple to add greylist command support to policyd-
weight.
Used when you match only one RBL or get over some specific score. And p0f
support contributing to the score
grant maxwell wrote:
It would be very simple to add greylist command support to policyd-
weight.
Used when you match only one RBL or get over some specific score. And p0f
support contributing to the score? Heck, I'll make some patches myself, it
would be much more useful than maRBL.
Hans du Plooy wrote:
Hi guys,
I have postfix set up with greylisting and a few RBL checks, and
amavisd-new-2.4.2 and spamassassin-3.1.7 on Debian Etch. The box was
running Sarge with amavisd-new-2.3 (from experimental repo) before, and
I upgraded via apt-get distupgrade. All is working
Peter Matulis wrote:
I have amavisd-new and postfix running together. I use mailgraph to
summarize the activity. I have a question re the graph (see attached
png image) that is being produced by mailgraph.
My server is strictly a spam filter and mail gateway. There is no
local postfix
Ed Lucero wrote:
How can I send spam to a dedicated spam respository server.
I know I can send all spam to a single address by setting
spam_quarantine_to to [EMAIL PROTECTED] But I want to maintain the recipient
address when it gets sent, so the receiving MTA can place it in the
correct
Christopher Rasch-Olsen Raa wrote:
Hi,
I have been trying to find out how I can get amavis configured so messages
tagged as spam gets delivered to a 'Junk'-folder for that particular
recipient.
After some googling I've come to believe that is achieved using
plus-addressing, but I have
I just discovered that amavisd-new doesn't like message/partial (nor do I:)
X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER, MIME error: error: part did not end with expected
boundary
This was for a message with
Content-Type: message/partial;
total=2;
id=...;
number=1
what is the
Daniel Johansson wrote:
Hello, I've just installed postfix (virtual users) + amavisd (postfix
+ clamav) on FreeBSD 6.1. Everything seems to be working fine but I'm
a little confused how to run sa-learn to train spamassassin.
fix you clock:) run ntpdate then run ntpd.
First of do I have to
albi albinootje wrote:
mm, i wasn't aware that postfix can possibly also block gif-attachments,
thanks for the reminder
Not that I encourage blocking gif, but you can use header_checks.
something like:
/^Content-Type:\s*image\/gif/ 550 gif obsoleted here. use png.
should do. If
Voytek Eymont wrote:
On Mon, October 23, 2006 7:37 am, mouss wrote:
albi albinootje wrote:
mm, i wasn't aware that postfix can possibly also block
gif-attachments, thanks for the reminder
Not that I encourage blocking gif, but you can use header_checks.
something like
Mark Martinec wrote:
I have not been able to figure out
if there is a way to tell sendmail to use an alternate pickup
daemon when piping a message back to Postfix.
I don't think there is a way. Pickup picks messages from a maildrop directory,
and by the time message gets there,
Vladimir wrote:
Hi all.
I'm using postfix + amavisd-new-2.4.2 + spamassassin.
Is there any chance to completely disable the insertion of the
X-Spam-Status header field with all the scores, tests, etc. even if the
message is considered spam? I only need the X-Spam-Flag header field
set to YES
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you deliver messages tagged as undesirable to a quarantine. This may be
- a junk folder
- spam headers added to message (then MUAs are configured to use these
to eithe put the message in a special folder or to just allow user to
order messages so that they can focus
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can use HOLD (in postfix) or a quarantine mechanism.
What do you mean quarantine mechanism? If this can be done in sendmail,
please tell me how.
you deliver messages tagged as undesirable to a quarantine. This may be
- a junk folder
- spam headers added
Bill Landry wrote:
[snip]
Mark, is amavisd-new missing anything that I should be concerned about by
having mail injected via SMTP vs. ESMTP? I noticed that Postfix delivers to
Amavisd via ESMTP, but the smtpclient delivers via SMTP.
old smtp doesn't support DSN, 8BITMIME, ...
You may
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, but is there an alternative that will permit rejection of messages?
A dual SMTP setup will only let you bounce them.
You can use HOLD (in postfix) or a quarantine mechanism.
Bouncing viruses or
spam is not the best way to go, however losing mail isn't very
Shane Hickey wrote:
Hello all,
I'm running with Amavisd-new, Postfix, Spamassassin, ClamAV and
SquirrelMail (with the amavisnewsql and spam_buttons plugins) on my mail
server. (See versions below). Anyway, recently I put dspam into the mix but
I want to refine how I train it. I'm
Andreas Dahlén wrote:
Hello!
Today we are handleing mail via Sendmail, MimeDefang and SpamAssassin.
Mail classified as SPAM is quarantined and once every day a list of
quarantined
mail is sent to the user, from which he/she could recover a quarantined
mail.
We are now going to switch
Mark Martinec wrote:
Sysadmin,
My settings are as follows in amavisd.conf
$sa_tag2_level_deflt = 3.1;
$sa_kill_level_deflt = 9.0;
So suppose I want the mails which have a score of equal to or greater
than 3.1 and less than 9.0 to go to a separate spam box for that
domain . Above 9.0
Karsten Scheibler wrote:
Hello,
I've written (yet another) loganalyze script for postfix and amavis.
Currently i use the message-id of a mail to bring together all postfix and
amavis log entries belonging to a specific mail (after using queue-id and
amavis pid+child_id to get all postfix
Scott Friedman wrote:
Is there a way (virus_lovers_maps?) to tell Amavisd (2.4) to not virus
scan?
I run a PhpBB forum, and i'm getting errors now, since it seems like
Clamscan is taking up to 30 seconds to scan for viruses, and the
smtp.php times out on the forum (or takes forever)
can
Mark Martinec wrote:
Hopefully the last release candidate before the final release:
http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/amavisd-new-2.4.0-rc5.tar.gz
Working here: NetBSD (3.0_RC5) with Net Server 0.88.
---
This SF.Net email is
Bowie Bailey a écrit :
Harry Hoffman wrote:
I'm looking at writing a bit of code that automatically encrypts
emails with gpg that are not encrypted and was wondering if it would
be best to use Amavis to do this.
A email would arrive via smtp be handed off to amavis for spam/virus
scanning, if
Mark Martinec a écrit :
mouss,
a quick test resulted in an error:
Mar 21 00:28:39 ouzoud amavis[8008]: (08008-01) (!!) TROUBLE in
check_mail: parts_decode_ext FAILED: parsing file(1) results - missing
last 1 results at (eval 44) line 154.
This is on a NetBSD 3.0_RC5 (the file command
Mark Martinec a écrit :
A release candidate for 2.4.0 is available at:
http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/amavisd-new-2.4.0-rc1.tar.gz
Since -pre7: added access controls to p0f-analyzer.pl, better logging
of DSN decisions, properly handle DSN with D_DISCARD, read_hash fixed,
cleaner
Jim Knuth a écrit :
Mar 21 00:28:39 ouzoud amavis[8008]: (08008-01) (!!) TROUBLE in
check_mail: parts_decode_ext FAILED: parsing file(1) results - missing
last 1 results at (eval 44) line 154.
not by me. Works fine. :)
Are you running NetBSD (3.0 or whatever)?
Peter Santiago a écrit :
Hi,
Let me rephrase the subject line... ^_^
Is there anyway I can preserve the X-DSPAM-Signature in the headers
when an email is tagged as spam? I'm just using SA's static rules and
DSPAM's bayesian capability.
what do you mean? I am using dspam before
Richard Bishop a écrit :
Hi,
I'm not sure whether this is an amavis or SA question, but here goes.
The setup we have uses exim, amavisd-new, SA, razor, which is extremely
reliable
and catches most of the spam we recieve, though still misses the occassional
few.
Much of the spam we
Les Ault a écrit :
On Thu, 2006-02-09 at 00:03 +0100, mouss wrote:
Les Ault a écrit :
[snip]
but your postfix log shows a correct address:
Feb 7 16:13:01 mta1 postfix/qmgr[3198]: 1E0EE91EF1:
from=[EMAIL PROTECTED], size=2460, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
Don't you reject_non_fqdn_sender
Leone, Michael a écrit :
I have a bit of an odd issue. I use postfix, with amavisd-new-20030616
and spamassassin 3.1.0a, on Debian testing. I have a cronjob that
creates a postfix log summary (using pflogsumm), and then it mails it to
me.
some things that may help:
1- set your
Les Ault a écrit :
One of my users just received some spam that made it past
amavisd/SpamAssassin; The
message was your average text formatted mortgage spam.
This message has been blocked by amavisd/SpamAssassin in the past so I did
some
checking and found the envelope sender on this
Christopher Jack a écrit :
Hi there,
I've been looking into this very problem over the last few days and wondered
how you got on with your solution as I'm in the same boat as you. That is
that my amavisd-new box and my web host are different machines.
How did you get on with the Horde
Les Ault a écrit :
The space is from the sending MTA (spamming MTA) during the MAIL
FROM command. To test my theory, I used a previously quarantined spam
message (all my messages are quarantined in BSMTP format). Using vi, I
added a space between the tld and the , then re-injected the
Jakob Curdes a écrit :
Try the command line option '--user=[EMAIL PROTECTED]'. Do you use
DSPAM with virtual users?
We have many domains on the server and user postfix as MTA. We use the
postfix virtual table to map mail addresses to system users, but all
mail users (i.e. pop/imap
Sebastien Andreatta a écrit :
Hello, and good evening all ;-)
I'm new user from the mailing list and i come today to ask you a simple
question...
I have installed spamassassin (yum install spamassassin on FC4) after
clamav..
And to finish, amavisd ...
I have using this page to
Al Bogner a écrit :
No, it is a bounce message. Decoded message text follows:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message delivery failed to the following address
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reason: Mailbox [EMAIL PROTECTED] deactivated
How did you decode it?
man uudecode.
Matthias Keller a écrit :
Hi
I know this would fit to a postfix list too, but since I guess a lot of
you guys are running this setup I hope to find a solution here too...
I'm running a dual postfix-2.2.5-5 setup with amavisd-new-2.3.3-5
It all works fine except for something that
Santos a écrit :
I have this custom rule on /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
uri GEOCITIES
/^http:\/\/(uk|it|de|sg|ar|jp|in|es|au|ca|www)\.geocities\.com\/.*\/\?/i
describe GEOCITIES Tons of spam with Geocities URL
scoreGEOCITIES 4.0
However it simply doesn't work. Geocities spam,
Nokin Jérôme a écrit :
Hello,
I'm currently using Postfix + Spamassassin at my office.
So my master.cf file look like this :
#---
smtp inet n - n - - smtpd -o
content_filter=
spamassassin
Jorge Salamero Sanz a écrit :
hi all,
i've this fetchmail configuration, i redirect all my email in fooserver to my
account in myhost.tld:
set postmaster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
set bouncemail
set no spambounce
set properties
set daemon 60
poll fooserver.tld with proto POP3
user 'luser' there
Gérald Macinenti a écrit :
Hi,
Using Amavis-new 2.3.3, having all destiny set to D_DISCARD except
aheh? so you don't fear false positives?
for virus which is set to D_PASS, a mail matching virus and banned
will arrive to its recip and go to virus quarantine, but a mail
matching virus and
Randy Kintner a écrit :
Hi,
I'm trying to configure our amavis-new/spamassassin/postfix setup to skip
scanning of mails directed to one particular user. Currently, I am set up
to scan, tag (if evaluated as spam), and deliver all mail (deletion or
quarantine of even one false positive is not
Peter a écrit :
Well, for me, it is a huge contributor to identifying spam. Typically I
get scores of around 7 with AWL being responsible for 6 of that. I turned
it off in local.cf and now the spam just floats by...
If you decide to turn it off, you'll need to look at your spam and tune
mouss a écrit :
if content_filter is only defined in smtp -in master.cf), that won't
get filtered.
I meant in smtpd.
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
Yackley, Matt a écrit :
For the most part Exchange will add some Microsoft specific headers and
remove most of the original headers. Here are some of the headers that
the message will retain:
From
Received
Content-Type
Date
Message-ID
To:
and CC: I guess.
Here are some of the headers
Shelley Waltz a écrit :
I am running postfix-2.0.18-1/amavisd-new-20030616/spamassassin-2.63-1.
I am also running squirrelmail-1.4.3. These all run on the same host.
I wish to exclude mail sent from squirrelmail to either local recipients
or non-local recipients from spam filtering.
Mark Martinec a écrit :
...My guess is the emji.net headers were there prior to blast.com accepting
this message. ...
So it looks like existing X-Spam headers are not removed unless spam
scanning is enabled. It does not mean blast.com is scanning.
Indeed. There is no need to remove
Elijah Savage a écrit :
Dale Walsh wrote:
I've done a major rewrite again, daemonized the application, cleaned
up the web interface.
I realize that I just added the auto cron create/delete routines but
since some platforms were having issues with the cron jobs I decided
to go a
Gregory Mokhin a écrit :
Looks like same spammers that had used geocities before now send
messages with new urls (an excerpt):
Free check-up details review with our approved expert.
http://if.jlp.forwardthebest.com/n4j/
message to oz, saying if he lilyhanded did not let them in
Gregory Mokhin a écrit :
Thanks Pavel, Noel and Gary for your replies.
uri GEOCITIES /^http:\/\/(uk|it|www)\.geocities\.com\/.*\/\?/i
Isn't this too generic? Any false positives?
you can remove it in the future if you fear FPs. but for now, it brings
too much spam.
anyway,
Jochen Seifarth a écrit :
I do use SquirrelMail, but still AFAIK it's only a web interface to email,
i.e. it displays on a Web UI what's in my mail folders (via IMAP). No idea
if/how you could get SquirrelMail to move your mail items to different
folders. Isn't that an LDA (e.g. procmail) job ?
Charles Farinella a écrit :
Can I attach X-Spam-Status to all emails regardless of whether they
actually reach the kill level? In amavisd.conf I have set:
$sa_tag_level_deflt = -99.0; # add spam info headers if at, or above
that level
this should work. make sure you don't have a second
Clifton Royston a écrit :
I guess my point was more along the lines of: why is it routed
through amavisd in the first place? Why send a self-generated DSN
through anyway?
because he is using transport to pass mail to different amavisd's
depending on the recipient domain.
The problem
Clifton Royston a écrit :
Ah, I see.
If you replace transports with a Postfix access map that does:
example.com FILTER smtp:localhost:10026
example.net FILTER smtp:localhost:10025
or similar, then you can still route domains (or even specific users)
to a specific amavisd
101 - 166 of 166 matches
Mail list logo
