EMT is thin wall electrical conduit.
Bob - N0DGN
-- Original message --
From: "ne1s" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For the uninitiated, what's "EMT?"
>
> I think I've figured out it's not "Emergency Medical Technician" in this
> context.
>
> -Larry/NE1S
>
> W5OMR/Geoff w
Electrical Metalic Tubing. Also known as thin wall conduit.
73, Ed Richards, K6UUZ
Simi Valley, California, 93065
Home of Air Force 1 Pavilion
On Wed, 07 Dec 2005 13:19:00 -0500 "ne1s" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For the uninitiated, what's "EMT?"
>
> I think I've figured out it's not "Emerge
ne1s wrote:
For the uninitiated, what's "EMT?"
I think I've figured out it's not "Emergency Medical Technician" in
this context.
-Larry/NE1S
W5OMR/Geoff writes:
The other alternative is to get a few joints of EMT. They come with
one end threaded and are joinable, end-to-end. Drill a h
Edward B Richards wrote:
Electrical Metalic Tubing. Also known as thin wall conduit.
I used to sell and deliver the stuff.. The EMT I'm referring to, are
the 3" and 4" I.D. that was threaded one end and had a built-in coupler
at the other - not quite so thin. They come in 10' and 20' sect
I believe the variety that Geoff is referring to is more like schedule 40
galvanized pipe.
The EMT is entirely too thin to be threaded. It is as Geoff says, too light to
support itself.
The EMT I've worked with can be bent pretty easily by hand. The type of
conduit that Geoff is referring to
Hi,
It also goes to "Electrical Metallic Tubing" ;-))
73
Joe - ct1axg
-
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 01:30:28 -0600
From: W5OMR/Geoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Re: Valiant and Loop progress
To: Discussion of AM Radio
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED
Patrick,
There's no RM number because the FCC has not accepted
the League's Petition.
It's an old tactic for a petitioner to provide a blank
like the group in Newington has done, just to make it
nice and easy for the agency to fill in the blank.
Nice try.
Paul/VJB
We called it "heavy wall conduit". It looks like water pipe but differs
in 2 major ways: A. the threads do not taper, so it does not get tight
until the ends meet inside the coupling, and B. it is smooth inside so as
not to abrade the insulation on the wires. Merry Christmas.
73, Ed Richards, K6UU
Acceptance question:
Has the FCC provided an RM number to the sweeping amateur radio proposal
your CTT group submitted in June05 that would have major ramifications to
the amateur radio service? Do you ever plan to amend your proposal to
include the omissions in the license class tables where some
Paul and Everyone-
I am a former ARRL Rocky Mountain Division
Vice-Director who served two terms (1990-1994). My
main issue with any League proposal is that they do
not site research through membership and/or Amateur
Radio community surveys for their rule-making
petitions. They also are usually th
Hi Bob,
Thanks for your thoughts. I'm totally with you on the
need for Newington to poll its constituents BEFORE
acting on a major policy or regulatory proposal like
this one.
It's as if they're living in the days when the U.S.
needed an Electoral College for the White House,
because the "voters
To All-
Hi! I just thought I would let everyone know that this
past week, I purchased a complete AM
transmitter/receiver station w/accessories! It is very
similar to the one I had in New Jersey as WA2CXS in my
senior year of high school 1968. I purchased a
partially restored (LV-HV filters, screen
Bob,
Glad you got the equipment. I too have a Viking II and
a National receiver. The National is a 173 and it
still has the original caps in it. The Viking was also
partially restored, and I finished it and put it on
the air. When I get time, usually on the weekend, I am
generally on 75 on 3880-38
Bob Scupp wrote:
To All-
Hi! I just thought I would let everyone know that this
past week, I purchased a complete AM
transmitter/receiver station w/accessories!
Congrats, Bob!
Let me be the first to invite you to join the ERAM group on 3.885Mc,
that typically starts around 4am, CST (3AM M
Cory-
Thank you for your post. It's nice to meet with you. I
certainly appreciate the offer to meet with me on 75
AM 3880-3890. When I am on the air I will let you know
so we can make a sked.
Thanks again.
Best 73's,
Bob K5SEP
--- Cory Hine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bob,
>
> Glad you got
Geoff-
Thank you so much for the friendly invite to the ERAM
group on 3.885Mc at 4AM CST. I will keep you and
everyone else posted when I can make my entrance on 75
meters AM.
Have you seen my newly created domain site? It is
k5sep.com. (not case sensitive)day via Yahoo. It has
some neat stuff yo
Hey Bob, hope to hear you soon from Mountainair. Don't know your schedule,
but 75 will be good for the shorted distances in the early afternoon around
3:30 or so and up to mid mornings as well.
There is a pretty large group of Colorado, NM, Wyoming, and Nebraska hams on
3.875 in the mornings.
VJB stated: Too bad that system has been discredited by the laundry list
of bad moves that could have been avoided by the leadership in Newington,
had they only alllowed popular opinion and asked some people for guidance
on what they should do.
> (Um, BEFORE they go and do it, not as a blind email
How many amateurs did you solicit comments from before you submitted your
proposal? I see your proposal has a section on "views considered" from
QRZ postings, but did you really go out and solicit comments and
reactions to your tentative proposal before you issued it? I see no
record of that.
L
Hi ALL,
I wonder why it is beeing mostly mentioned 75m, when
in fact it is supposed to be 80m?
The (old) sets and books and tables and slang were
always referring 80m band (3.5 - 3.8 MHz).
The 75m correspond to 4.0 MHz: is this a new band or a
new trend?
Thanks for clarification on this :-)
73
Jose-
Hi and good evening.
Thanks for asking a good question about 75/80 meters.
--- Jose HF Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The (old) sets and books and tables and slang were
> always referring 80m band (3.5 - 3.8 MHz).
You are certainly correct here. The lower portion of
the band does re
Jose HF Silva wrote:
Hi ALL,
I wonder why it is beeing mostly mentioned 75m, when
in fact it is supposed to be 80m?
The (old) sets and books and tables and slang were
always referring 80m band (3.5 - 3.8 MHz).
The 75m correspond to 4.0 MHz: is this a new band or a
new trend?
Thanks for clari
--- W5OMR/Geoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's just word
> association. 'FCC type accepted' is a common
> phrase.
It's more than that, 'FCC type accepted' is recognized
by a lot of other countries. I'm sure Industry Canada
often just checks the FCC reports and then "rubber
stamps" them to
David McClafferty wrote:
--- W5OMR/Geoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's just word
association. 'FCC type accepted' is a common
phrase.
It's more than that, 'FCC type accepted' is recognized
by a lot of other countries. I'm sure Industry Canada
often just checks the FCC reports an
Hello to the list. I need a replacement for the on/off AF gain switch for my
Mohawk receiver. If anyone has an extra or a source for one please let me
know. Thank you,
73, Mason
kd5yhx
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 8 21:50:50 2005
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Original-To: amradio@mail
Geoff:
I think you're missing the point here.
VJB said: "Thanks for your thoughts. I'm totally with you on the need for
Newington to poll its constituents BEFORE acting on a major policy or
regulatory proposal like this one.
Too bad that system has been discredited by the laundry list of bad mov
> >
> >
>
> What privledges do entry level hams have in Canada,
> Dave? Is there any
> HF activitly allowed, at all?
>
>
> -Geoff/W5OMR
The Basic license, up until recently, allowed VHF
operation only.
By taking a 5 wpm code test they could then operate on
HF limited to 250 watts and commer
27 matches
Mail list logo
