On Nov 18, 2007 1:01 AM, Michael Towers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Another possibility might be to place the glibc install script in
> another package, which can be installed after its dependencies have been
> installed.
Or, another alternative would be to provide the install script as a
script
On Nov 16, 2007 3:41 PM, Jason Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wouldn't that mean that anything that used /bin/sh as its interpreter would
> have to be valid dash script and not the bash script that we expected?
Of course, but that's a good thing. Most of our official scripts use
/bin/bash anyway
On Nov 16, 2007 11:45 AM, Roman Kyrylych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I like Andrew's suggestion.
Uhh... Andrew? /me looks around
Did you mean me? 8)
___
arch mailing list
arch@archlinux.org
http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
On Nov 16, 2007 6:04 AM, Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Roman Kyrylych schrieb:
> >> bash 3.2.025-2 -> depends on readline>=5.2
> >> readline 5.2-5 -> depends on ncurses
> >> ncurses 5.6-6 -> depends on glibc
> >> glibc 2.7-7 -> depends on bash -> oops!
> >>
> >> But it looks like ther
On Nov 12, 2007 5:57 PM, Greg Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there anything we need to know about the big change with QT in testing?
Does this cover it?
http://archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2007-November/003095.html
I'm generally not a Qt user, so there may be complexity I missed
On Nov 7, 2007 9:43 PM, Ryan Sims <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 7, 2007 8:00 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Nov 7, 2007 2:27 AM, DaNiMoTh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I hope this never happen; I love arch as is.
> > >
On Nov 7, 2007 2:27 AM, DaNiMoTh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I hope this never happen; I love arch as is.
> A stable / conservative branch will only steal time of devs.
> It's better use 100% of our forces to improve core, extra and
> community and packages contained in these.
>
> Oh, all things I
On Nov 6, 2007 2:46 PM, Travis Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Nov 2007 14:42:04 -0600, Aaron Griffin wrote
>
> > On Nov 6, 2007 6:34 AM, Dirk Kredler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hello!
> > >
> > > I had a few problems with
On Nov 6, 2007 6:34 AM, Dirk Kredler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I had a few problems with "pacman -Syu" in the last time:
>
> - on a small Server after a "pacman -Syu" the Server dosent boot up anymore
> (Kernel failure with sw-raid(?)):
> downgraded
>
> - on another Server with ISDN (
On Nov 6, 2007 2:31 PM, Hussam Al-Tayeb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, unless I am mistaken, the xorg-server 1.4-4 which was in testing was
> rebuilt with an additional patch and placed in 'extra' without bumping
> the pkgrel. Is this true or did I imagine it?
I believe you're correct:
http://c
On 10/30/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ideally my account would get fixed.
It would... but you haven't told me what was wrong? Fixing doesn't
just "happen"
___
arch mailing list
arch@archlinux.org
http://archlinux.org/mailman/li
On 10/26/07, Jan de Groot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One other story is gnucash:
> - did 1.6 stop working with recent system libraries?
> - was goffice 0.5 a requirement for some other package?
> Goffice 0.5 breaks both abiword-plugins (extra) and gnucash (community/AUR).
My fault here. I didn't
On 10/22/07, Jeffrey Parke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was wondering if there were any plans to port Firefox or one of its
> descendants (iceweasel) to a qt base instead of gtk. I ask this because
> firefox doesn't really integrate well with the rest of kde. I install
> gtk-qt-engine and still t
On 10/22/07, gan lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any plan to port pacman to support PackageKit? Just be curious.
Erm, I don't believe Dan and I have ever heard of PackageKit. If you
would LIKE this to happen, I'd suggest the following:
a) Join the pacman-dev mailing list.
b) Tell us why
On 10/8/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I just had a brief question about the madwifi. I just started using Arch,
> and let me say you guys are doind a great job. I have used linux for about
> 5 years and it always seems that the windows driver for my card with
> ndiswrapper ge
On 10/7/07, solsTiCe d'Hiver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> to all of you
>
> ok. i take the blame. i should have seen the problem coming again. And not
> press [enter] blindly as every time.
>
> so i apologize for those f** words.
>
> but i suppose everyone is aware of the problem now.
> that was th
On 10/7/07, solsTiCe d'Hiver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi, guys,
> some of you might remember an email i sent the 30th of july
> http://archlinux.org/pipermail/arch/2007-July/015102.html
> when i lost my internet connexion because some guy updated the libpcap package
> but not the ppp package be
On 10/4/07, Johannes Held <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey cool,
> aur got a new design..
>
> Looks good.
Yeah, I love it.
Great job to everyone involved
___
arch mailing list
arch@archlinux.org
http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
On 10/3/07, Damir Perisa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> in my eyes, it is not a significant difference. but it helps extremely
> when done over a longer period (years).
It depends on your FS too. I've seen 'time's going from 25s to 5s before
___
arch mail
On 9/29/07, Xavier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 10:03:38PM +0300, Alexandros K-K wrote:
> > on the same topic (more or less) i cant figure out how i can search for
> > keyword a && keyword b
> > currently pacman only searches for keywoard a || keyword b
> >
>
> If you don't
>
> I've given it a lot of thought, and based on the state of things,
> all-round competencies, initiatives, and willingness, I would like to
> pass this leadership role on to Aaron Griffin, also known as Phrakture
> on IRC and the forums.
>
> He's a good jack-of-all
On 9/28/07, Scott Horowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any chance we can keep the discussion on-topic? As much as I
> enjoy the flurry of off-topic emails...
Welcome to the internet?
___
arch mailing list
arch@archlinux.org
http://archlinux.or
I ordered 3 bottles of this "magic pill". i wonder when it will arrive.
___
arch mailing list
arch@archlinux.org
http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
On 9/27/07, Manny Calavera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 03:52:21PM -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> > On 9/24/07, RedShift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Aaron Griffin wrote:
> > > > Hey all,
> > &
On 9/27/07, Roman Kyrylych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/9/27, Allan McRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I have been thinking about how this should be done without creating a
> > custom parser for the last few days.
> >
> > What I see is two cases for the use of split packages
> > 1) Splitting build
On 9/26/07, Simo Leone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You know the funny part is this is the second time they've forged it
> coming from me in the headers. Those sons of bitches.
Maybe they think you need...*ahem*"help"in that department?
___
arch
On 9/25/07, bardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To be honest, Aaron, I left you a couple of lines on #archlinux-tu,
> and I sent you a mail on your gmail address on the 10th of July :-)
I'm not in #archlinux-tu - maybe you told phrik?
I dropped the ball here. I forwarded the email along, but I *th
On 9/25/07, bardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I'm writing to ask about the current status of the mail aliases for
> developers and trusted users. At the moment the system accepts mails
> but does not forward them, and it's been this way at least for the
> past four months. I think that
On 9/24/07, RedShift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Aaron Griffin wrote:
> > Hey all,
> > * 'Continuous Integration' setup / machine
> >
> > This is a pipedream of mine. I'd like to setup a CI server somewhere.
> > For those unfamilia
On 9/23/07, Johannes Held <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> a friend of mine asked me "if Arch has signed packages".
>
> Now I searched after "pacman signed packages" and found these two links:
> http://archlinux.org/pipermail/arch/2004-November/002856.html
> http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/5331?
Guys please. The original request was for ideas, not comments.
Perhaps this is why it was never brought up in public? Because the
signal-to-noise would be too low?
___
arch mailing list
arch@archlinux.org
http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
On 9/21/07, Jürgen Hötzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, because the sender used a subscribed email address:
>
> (envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) id 1IYQPI-0003ti-7B
Yeah that's what I was looking at, but I can't seem to find a way to
deny envelope-from posts, but that can actually be usefu
On 9/21/07, Christer Solskogen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aaron Griffin wrote:
>
> > One of the things we'd LOVE to do with PKGBUILDs is create the ability
> > to build multiple packages from one PKGBUILD. That is, we could run
> > make once, and create: foo, f
On 9/21/07, Xavier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 03:52:41PM -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> > > There is a recent feature request about it, including a patch :
> > > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/7982
> > >
> > > And al
On 9/21/07, Xavier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 02:58:38PM -0500, Mark Schneider wrote:
> > On 9/21/07, Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Mister Dobalina schrieb:
> > > > Now that gcc/gcc-libs is split, does it matter what
> > > > order they are built in? Shoul
On 9/20/07, Julian Saraceni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 20. September 2007 20:30:58 schrieb Hussam Al-Tayeb:
> > hmm.. is it possible to non list-subscribers to send messages to the
> > mailing list?
>
> I don't think so.
We're looking into this now, don't be a'feared!
___
Code=d2f9b0d8-b7bb-4d71-82b0-2929162557cc
Aaron Griffin
Shelfari is a free site that lets you share book ratings and reviews with
friends and meet people who have similar tastes in books. It also lets you
build an online bookshelf, join book clubs, and get good book recommendations
from friends.
On 9/6/07, Damir Perisa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thursday 06 September 2007, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> | In addition, what if I wanted to make an installable package for
> | my homedir containing config files - silly, but someone might want
> | that /shrug.
>
> actua
On 9/5/07, Sergej Pupykin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >DP> Wednesday 05 September 2007, Dan McGee wrote:
> >DP> | This is something for namcap to check- as far as I can think,
> >DP> | makepkg does not enforce any packaging standards or such things
> >DP> | currently so I don't want to clutter
On 9/5/07, Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/5/07, Sergej Pupykin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >AG> On 9/5/07, Sergej Pupykin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> Generally agree, but I think no packages should install files to /home,
> > >> /tmp, /var/tmp, /dev, /media, /mnt, /root.
> >
On 9/5/07, Sergej Pupykin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Generally agree, but I think no packages should install files to /home,
> /tmp, /var/tmp, /dev, /media, /mnt, /root.
>
> And it should be written in Arch Packaging Standard.
Sweet! When did you become a developer?
On 9/4/07, Martin Brandenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Using /srv for all server root dirs does sound like a good idea, but it would
> be more simple (and KISS) to just leave root dirs as the source package
> defaults as long as they don't conflict.
Well we should also _create_ those directo
On 9/4/07, Sergej Pupykin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I see /srv in filesystem package.
> >>
> >> What about www root? What decision was reached?
> >>
>
> >RK> For reference:
> >RK> http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/1857
> >RK> http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/5876
> >RK> Could we finally do the
On 8/30/07, Alexander Kuzmenkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Where is new stardict-3?
> Is maintainer alive?
Of course I'm alive. I'm a busy beaver though, and typically personal
emails work way better for this sort of stuff - I don't really read ML
traffic all that much anymore.
I will get to it
On 8/14/07, _saiko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I noticed that site lookup from my linux box was rather slow
> took me 5-10 secs to load google for example.
> Checked that /etc/hosts has correct 127.0.0.1 hostname form and that lo
> interface was up. Then i tried disabling IPv6 but still no change.
On 8/14/07, bardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I've always been noticing that some graphical apps lack .desktop
> files, and it is really annoying, because I can't see what I just
> installed in the menu, and often I forget about its existence, if it's
> a non-essential app. I've never
On 8/13/07, _saiko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> thx this really helped!
>
> but something obviously isn't working as supposed here.
> when i go to a link that has let's say .mpg extension here's what opens:
> http://pub.insanity.in/img/scrshot/download1.png
>
> then i go and use the browse button t
On 8/11/07, Grigorios Bouzakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A small update on this.
> Tried a Linuxtag ISO earlier and it worked just fine (like in the past).
> Issues still remain with both other ISO's though.
Did you log a bug report? Can you post the link here?
On 8/10/07, Grigorios Bouzakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 12:52:13PM -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> > On 8/10/07, Grigorios Bouzakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 01:22:19PM -0400, Zac Brown wrote:
> > > >
On 8/10/07, Grigorios Bouzakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 01:22:19PM -0400, Zac Brown wrote:
> > I installed with the Duke FTP Install cd two days ago actually using the
> > Georgia Tech mirror. Now by static IP do you mean my connection is
> > static? I'm not sure it woul
On 8/9/07, Tobias Kieslich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I hear you all, but we talk about vi here not about vim, where this is
> not the editor to be used in "production" on everyday base but the
> barebone, to hack a conf file editor in arch's base repo. Everything
> else vim is for with al its go
On 8/9/07, Andrew Fyfe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've got perl and python but not ruby :)
>
> My point is we shouldn't be forcing the user to install 25MB of packages
> for a basic feature.
I agree 100%, just wanted to chide ya!
___
arch mailing list
On 8/9/07, Andrew Fyfe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> YES it's worth it :D
>
> I mainly use vim over ssh so I've got no need for a gui and having to
> install perl/python/ruby (deps for new vim package) just for syntax
> highlighting will be a PITA.
I agree with Andrew here, but I want to say: man,
On 8/4/07, François Charette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As I wrote, I use ndiswrapper. This is for a wlan usb stick
> (http://www.avm.de/en/Produkte/FRITZBox/FRITZ_WLAN_USB_Stick/index.html).
> There is now a native linux (proprietary) module for it but it sucks in
> comparision with the windows
On 8/4/07, François Charette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> after doing a system upgrade a few days ago, I was unable to access my wlan0
> interface
> when I rebooted my system this morning. Downgrading dhcpd from 3.1.3-1 to
> 3.0.19-1 solved
> the issue. The error message was "dhcpcd
On 7/29/07, Jaroslaw Swierczynski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 1.0X and 1.0
> 1.0X is newer because there is no number after X.
X was "eXperimental" and is before 1.0
> > 3.4_a and 3.4.a
>
> 3.4_a is newer because 4_a > 4.
These are the same version. I just renamed the tarball.
> > 7 and 7_f
On 7/29/07, Jaroslaw Swierczynski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/7/29, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > Again, you look like a fool.
>
> Because I'm questioning something you are convinced you're right
> about? Do you know what discussio
On 7/28/07, Jaroslaw Swierczynski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> $ vercmp 3.0.25 3.0.25b
> 1
>
> Not buggy, eh?
Again, you look like a fool. I can show you hundreds of apps that use
"b" to mean beta. Beta comes before the real release. So should my
"1.0 beta" release versioned "1.0b" supersede "1
On 7/28/07, Jaroslaw Swierczynski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/7/28, Scott Horowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > I'm sorry, but that's just untrue. Looking at the two version numbers,
> > I have no idea which is supposed to be newer without reading the
> > original poster's comments; certainly
On 7/12/07, RedShift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You should use xorgconfig at all times. All other tools are crap for
> generating Xorg config files.
I actually use 'X -configure' more often
___
arch mailing list
arch@archlinux.org
http://archlinux.org
On 6/25/07, arnuld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i have posted my problem to Arch Linux forums. only 2 people have
> replied and they have same UNSOLVED problem and i think it is a bug,
> may be in Arch, may be in Xorg, not sure.please take a look:
>
> http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=34369
On 6/15/07, Grigorios Bouzakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> after investigating the bash-completion package i must admit that most
> of the files included in the pkg are not needed by most users. some
> might even be considered decrepated. that doesnt apply to the archlinux
> specific file though.
On 6/13/07, Johan Grahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 22:43 +0100, Andrew Fyfe wrote:
> > Are there any plans (if so when) to switch the official repositories
> > over to the new package naming format?
> >
> > Current/Old: name-ver-rel.pkg.tar.gz
> > New: name-ver-rel-arch.pkg.
On 6/12/07, Jeff Rollin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the last episode, (On Tuesday 26 Sivan 5767 16:04:13), Thomas Bächler
> wrote:
> > It is not an issue of license costs. IIRC, you are not allowed to let
> > people pay for GPL software. You can sell the material and documentation
> > you wrote
On 5/31/07, Essien Ita Essien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Leif Thande wrote:
> > I wanted to wait for an answer from archlinux.fr before posting back
> > to this list, but the situation is getting a bit out of hand.
> >
> > I sent an email to Vincent-Xavier ( the one who proposed himself for
> > t
On 5/31/07, Benoit Chesneau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ... a lot of cranky things ...
It's a wonder why this little collaboration has never happened before, heh.
The following is not the "official position" of archlinux, but is my
own personal opinion:
Some kids just can't play nice in the san
On 5/31/07, Benoit Chesneau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't need collaboration to solve a problem. If problem there is,
> the problem is : no answer from archlinux.fr guys since 8 months.
>
> That's the problem. You can't discuss it with someone that don't
> answer.
Again, this is NOT conduci
On 5/31/07, Benoit Chesneau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On May 31, 2007, at 6:29 PM, Bruno RENIÉ wrote:
>
> > Le Thu, 31 May 2007 18:17:10 +0200,
> > Benoit Chesneau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> >>
> >> I already made a proposal in my last mail. As I did 9 months ago.
> >> This
> >> is the on
On 5/31/07, Benoit Chesneau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I dind't get this message in my inbox @archlinuxfr.org yet :
> http://archlinux.org/pipermail/arch/2007-May/014696.html
>
> But let me answer with facts :
> snip
And none of this matters. We all have personal problems
On 5/31/07, Benoit Chesneau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Btw do you really think that leif thande want to find a solution ?
>
> If he really wanted it why not contact us before ? Why just put a
> post on archlinux.fr
> then on mailing-list but forgot archlinuxfr.org. Why not contact each
> main
On 5/28/07, Tobias Powalowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Archlinux community,
> as already stated on ISO news, you can meet us on Linuxtag2007 in Berlin.
> We really look forward to it and hope we will have a real good time.
> You can meet there Andy(andyrtr), Alex(kth5), Jan(JGC) and me (tpow
On 5/29/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not meaning to jump on Jason here, but his is simply the most recent post
> in this thread (reply is easy).
>
> I would argue that the problem this is seeking to address, is a
> speculative hypothesis at this point. That is, that adding
On 5/29/07, Jason Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 10:51:58AM -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> > On 5/28/07, Jason Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 01:59:11PM -0600, Scott Horowitz wrote:
> > > > On 5/
On 5/28/07, Jason Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 01:59:11PM -0600, Scott Horowitz wrote:
> > On 5/28/07, Jason Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > My fear with updating a full integer is having people say, "why hasn't x86
> > > updated to -5?!? arch64 has -5, why does x86
On 5/26/07, Hussam Al-Tayeb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Blackbox has been moved to aur but the following packages are still in
> the official repository. bbconf bbkeys bbpager bbppp bbsload bbtime
> They are not installable because they depend on blackbox.
>
>
> pacman -S bbconf
> resolving depe
On 5/25/07, Erwin Van de Velde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I can't login on the bug tracking system bugs.archlinux.org: I get the
> following error:
> Error #23: User or group not enabled for login.
>
> This login (evdvelde) worked before, what is going on?
When I try to edit your user, f
On 5/23/07, Damir Perisa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you bring it up again... and i want to have tk removed... --disable-tk
> would be nice, without replacements, right? community agrees? if i do
> not hear any negative feedback, i will disable tk in a weeks time (if
> i do not forget ;) in xbindk
On 5/21/07, eliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "Ben Tartsa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sushi Takahashi in Portland Oregon?
>
> beer in eugene?
> :P
I have a feeling Eugene wouldn't like that. It might hurt, but we
should ask him.
___
arch mailin
On 5/21/07, Roman Kyrylych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/5/21, RedShift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Hey guys,
> >
> > I was thinking arch linux parties, where users and developers meet &
> > greet. But not to talk about computers, but to party! Organized per
> > country to keep travelling to a min
On 5/19/07, Roman Kyrylych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please someone with access to website change
> Releases
> 2007.05 Duke pending
> to
> 2007.05 Duke 2007-05-17
> :-D
Fixed it temporarily, this still needs some pkglist files, like the
other releases, and needs to be checked into CVS (/me look
On 5/18/07, Roman Kyrylych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/5/18, Pierre Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Am Freitag, 18. Mai 2007 17:25:49 schrieb Roman Kyrylych:
> > > Pierre was remastering ISO last night.
> > > Contact him. Maybe he already did some fixes or at least can tell his
> > > experie
On 5/18/07, Tobias Powalowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Freitag, 18. Mai 2007 schrieb Aaron Griffin:
> > On 5/18/07, Roman Kyrylych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > 2007/5/18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > Selon Tobias Powalo
On 5/18/07, Arnaud Fortier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For exemple kernel-server could hav some ckserver patch and other
> "related to server" patches, the same idea for laptop / desktop.
> Another way could be to have a pkgbuild like the kernel26viper (on aur)
> or wain's one where you can select
On 5/18/07, Roman Kyrylych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/5/18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Selon Tobias Powalowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > > Hi Archlinux Community,
> > > 17th May, 16:10 CEST (Central European Summer Time)
> > > it's done final 2007.05 Duke ISOs for i686 and
On 5/17/07, Richard Terry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can't seem to get Parallels to run on the newest kernel.
>
> Where can one find old kernel packages/headers to allow downgrading?
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Downgrade_packages
http://phraktured.net/archmirror/
_
On 5/17/07, Bozhidar Batsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was browsing through the sources of ALPM downloaded from the cvs and I
> noticed that there were folders for bindings for java, python, etc., but
> they were all empty. Are the bindings to be implemented? Will other
> language bindings be a
On 5/15/07, Greg B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> is there any discussion going on about how many and what kind of kernels are
> gonna be officialy suported in the future?
> are there any thoughts about having 1 for desktops and 1 for laptops?
> read some relevant stuff on the forum but it doesnt see
On 5/12/07, Vinay S Shastry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 13 May 2007 8:57:14 am Scott Horowitz wrote:
> > On 5/12/07, Mircea Bardac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Unfortunately, the kernel 2.6.21 in Arch misses a config option to make
> > > this utility work, namely: CONFIG_TIMER_STATS
On 5/10/07, Roman Kyrylych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/5/10, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On 5/10/07, Roman Kyrylych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > What about using animal names, i.e. Falco?
> >
> > Falco! that one's aweso
On 5/10/07, Roman Kyrylych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What about using animal names, i.e. Falco?
Falco! that one's awesome
___
arch mailing list
arch@archlinux.org
http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
On 5/9/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would advise putting out a new ISO with pacman 3 as soon as
> possible. Installing Arch Linux is nontrivial for newbies such as
> myself, and the pacman issue will just create a new hurdle for them.
> I had to try 3 different times, and I
On 5/9/07, Alessio 'mOLOk' Bolognino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 00:55 Thu 10 May , Alessio 'mOLOk' Bolognino wrote:
> > On 13:48 Wed 09 May , Aaron Griffin wrote:
> > > On 5/9/07, Jaroslaw Swierczynski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
On 5/9/07, James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/10/07, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 5/9/07, Georg Grabler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Heya.
> >
> > This is great, thanks a lot. I just want to comment so I can get some
On 5/9/07, G B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> it doesnt seem to me that the packages posted are gonna take much burden off
> the devs backs especially since most are gonna move from current to extra..
> to do so stuff must be moved from extra to community (aka from devs hands to
> tu's) or even uns
On 5/9/07, Ryan Ply <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 06:27:28PM +0200, Georg Grabler wrote:
> > I havn't had a look at [current] before.
> >
> > Let me tell you the interpretation for me.
> > For me, [current] should hold base packages. So packages needed to run
> > the system.
On 5/9/07, Jaroslaw Swierczynski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry, I didn't notice that you posted the same solution earlier
> (apart from forgetting it still will be a problem). So not pacman,
> then perhaps another package like filesystem with those two
> dependencies?
That was one of my thoug
On 5/9/07, Jaroslaw Swierczynski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How about releasing one last pacman2 with those dependencies added,
> then wait, say, two weeks before moving pacman3 to current?
The problem here is that the pacman2 upgrade would have the exact same
issue. It would require bug fixes
On 5/9/07, Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> gkrellmlaunch
> gkrellshoot
> mknbi
> ez-ipupdate
> qtella
> mutella (although this might still be used by a lot of people)
> plib
> ...
> and anything else that has an update date before 2006. People with
> more knowledge than me should look though
On 5/9/07, Jason Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 05:17:10PM +0200, Georg Grabler wrote:
> > KOffice - rarely used compared to OpenOffice
>
> Is it?
That was my initial reaction too. My personal usage is as follows:
1) abiword/gnumeric/dia/whatever
2) koffice
3) openoffice
> On 5/9/07, Ben Tartsa < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Just a thought: How about a some sort of usage rating system? Unused
> packages are demoted and eventually ( perhaps ) disappear.
> >
On 5/9/07, G B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> we already have one.. archstats
> http://www.archlinux.org/~simo/
1 - 100 of 452 matches
Mail list logo
