Re: Customising the CI viewer .

2010-01-08 Thread Mahendra Mahalkar
Hi Frex, Have u flush the cache in the mid-tier configuration? Cheers, Mahendra Mahalkar On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Frex Popo frexp...@yahoo.fr wrote: ** Hello to everyone, The CI viewer/mid-tier does not pick up changes in the config.xml in the Data Visualisation Definition form.

Re: Customising the CI viewer .

2010-01-08 Thread Frex Popo
yes, thats the first thing I did. --- En date de : Ven 8.1.10, Mahendra Mahalkar mahendra.mahal...@gmail.com a écrit : De: Mahendra Mahalkar mahendra.mahal...@gmail.com Objet: Re: Customising the CI viewer . À: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Date: Vendredi 8 Janvier 2010, 9h57 ** Hi Frex, Have u flush

Re: Custom application upgrade ARS 4.3 to 7.5 on AIX

2010-01-08 Thread sriram pm
Hi, If it is totally a custom built application you can directly export and import provided there is no difference in the versions with respect to the forms User Interface. If you have customized an existing(Out of Box) application then we need to check whether the same set of Forms are

Re: Custom application upgrade ARS 4.3 to 7.5 on AIX

2010-01-08 Thread remedydon
Sri, This is a completely custom application built in ARS Remedy 4.3 and NOT an Out of the box application. All the customer wants is to upgrade it to the latest version 7.5 patch 3. As I already mentioned there is version difference as we are upgrading ARS. Any ideas what will be the issues ?

Re: Custom application upgrade ARS 4.3 to 7.5 on AIX

2010-01-08 Thread Barb Wagner
One workflow area that .. might not work anymore ... in one of the older versions you could execute Macros via workflow - that was removed ... in one version or another (maybe this is REALLY old like v3) Barb Wagner Remedy Architect IBM Global Services (612) 397-2955 Tie Line 608-1958

Re: Upgrade to 7.5, is it possible without any errors?

2010-01-08 Thread Grooms, Frederick W
For 7.01 Are you talking about 7.0.1 or 7.1.0? We did the upgrade from 6.3.0 (patch 20) to 7.1.0 (patch 3) with no errors on Sun 5.10 with Oracle 10g. This was on servers that started out as 5.1.2 Fred -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)

Re: DST Issues

2010-01-08 Thread Grooms, Frederick W
I do it by not adding time that way anymore. I use the DATEADD function instead. Function:DATEADD Arguments: (datepart, number, date) Returns: date Adds a specified number of days,

Re: Issues in SLM 7.0.3

2010-01-08 Thread Ramey, Anne
For #2, Yes, that should help. The exclusions for the target don't seem to automatically apply to the milestones. If you want the milestones to exclude or wait you'll need to specify that within the milestones. For #3, all I can recommend is to compare your configs. I recently upgraded from

Re: Custom application upgrade ARS 4.3 to 7.5 on AIX

2010-01-08 Thread David Sanders
As far as I know, run macros still work in all versions of ARS and it is still an option when adding actions in active links in DevStudio. One bit of functionality that was changed somewhere between v4 and v7.5 was the Window Open functionality that was split into Window Open/Window Loaded.

Re: Upgrade to 7.5, is it possible without any errors?

2010-01-08 Thread Jarl Grøneng
7.01 is 7.0.1 But my issues when upgrading to 7.5 (patch 3) One of the server startet out as 2.1, the others as 3.2 and 4.51... -- Jarl 2010/1/8 Grooms, Frederick W frederick.w.gro...@xo.com: For 7.01  Are you talking about 7.0.1 or 7.1.0? We did the upgrade from 6.3.0 (patch 20) to 7.1.0

Re: DST Issues

2010-01-08 Thread David Sanders
Hi Lisa This is the Remedy equivalent of relativity theory. What date/time you see depends upon your current date/time as far as DST is concerned. Let me try to explain. Dates in Remedy are stored as epoch time - the number of seconds since 12AM 1/1/1970 GMT. When you set your regional

Re: Data types are not appropriate for relational operation, 313, error message

2010-01-08 Thread Brien Dieterle
Thank you! That works! Now why didn't I try that myself. . . Brien On 1/7/2010 4:57 PM, Rod Harris wrote: Hi, Yes this is a problem with patch 3 of DS. I have found that you need to do 2 things to avoid using the old admin tool for editing some qualifications. 1. Use the button to open up

Re: ARServer Status monitor

2010-01-08 Thread Axton
I created a command line utility that can be used to check the availability of an ARServer. It should compile on all the platforms that Remedy runs on. I have verified it with the 6.3 and 7.1 apis on Solaris and Linux. It is built using the GNU Autotools (./configure --with-arapi-dir-/some/path

Re: EIE Exchange field mapping

2010-01-08 Thread John Kelley
I set the field mapping to the constants for each of the 3 tiers to set hardware/personal computer/laptop That now populates the records with those tiers and somehow populates the field Model with BMC_UNKNOWN. So its not finding my configured Model within the Product Names. I'm mapping the

Re: Upgrade to 7.5, is it possible without any errors?

2010-01-08 Thread Brittain, Mark
Jarl, This was discussed on the list before but I can't find the emails. I believe there is a white paper out that states you have to upgrade those server to 6.3 before you can go to 7.5. can't go straight from 2.1, 3.2, 4.51 to 7.5 Fellow Listers, if I am wrong or you have the link to the

Re: Upgrade to 7.5, is it possible without any errors?

2010-01-08 Thread LJ Longwing
I think the discussion is not 'upgrading' the serverbut instead, build a new server at 7.5 and then import a def of this application...which I think will work... -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of

Runmacro issue (RESOLVED)

2010-01-08 Thread Hyunkel v2.0
Thanks every you! Actually the macro was fine, and also the call for runmacro command on unix also was working fine. Some hints in case you face something like this: 1.- If you generate the macro with the Windows client, and then you upload the macro to an UNIX server (binary call, not using

RKM Timeouts

2010-01-08 Thread Nowak, James
We are having an issue with RKM getting timeout errors in the Remedy User tool. Our configuration is the following: RKM 7.2 patch 3 integrated with Remedy ARS 6.3 We are seeing the timeouts in both the RKM home page in the User tool as well as from the KnowledgeBase tab that is created in the

Re: Upgrade to 7.5, is it possible without any errors?

2010-01-08 Thread Jarl Grøneng
If you read my email once more it states: I've done a few upgrades from 6.3 and 7.01 to 7.5. But the issues does occour if the server was upgraded to 6.3 and 7.0.1 was original installed as version prior to version 6.3 -- Jarl 2010/1/8 Brittain, Mark mbritt...@navisite.com: Jarl, This was

Re: Upgrade to 7.5, is it possible without any errors?

2010-01-08 Thread Jarl Grøneng
That is not an option, the database is appox 80Gb and it woud take ages to move the records... But, it goes forward, in small steps. But found it very timeconsuming doing the install over and over again. It takes several hours each time the database has to be rolledback... -- Jarl 2010/1/8 LJ

Re: RKM Timeouts

2010-01-08 Thread Joe D'Souza
Are your web servers by any chance behind a load balancer? This error is seen when the web servers are behind a load balancer, and you have not configured it for sticky IP's. Joe -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org]on Behalf

Re: RKM Timeouts

2010-01-08 Thread Nowak, James
No. RKM is running on a Windows 2003 R2 VM. The only thing on this system is the RKM app. The DB is on dedicated SQL server. ARS is on a Sun box the mid-tier for that is on another web server also. No load balancers in this environment. Jim Nowak Infrastructure Tools OfficeMax Inc.

Re: RKM Timeouts

2010-01-08 Thread Chowdhury, Tauf
Do you have this issue when you don't use the User Tool such as accessing rkm via Incident management using mid tier? Tauf Chowdhury | Forest Laboratories, Inc. Analyst, Service Management Mobile:646.483.2779 -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)

Re: RKM Timeouts

2010-01-08 Thread Nowak, James
The users that access this and are seeing the timeouts are agents on the helpdesk so they use the User tool exclusively. I can ask then to try. If they are not seeing timeouts via the mid-tier would it be a setting change w/in User tool then? BTW, should have mentioned this before. Not

Re: RKM Timeouts

2010-01-08 Thread Lyle Taylor
Did you make any changes or do any customizations related to the values stored in the SessionID or Groups fields on KMS:Session? We had issues due to the IP address of the client being stored in the Groups field, where the recommended change by BMC caused a new SessionID to be created every

Re: RKM Timeouts

2010-01-08 Thread Chowdhury, Tauf
James, Take a look at this excerpt below. We had issues with RKM 7.2 p2 where users kept being prompted to log in. See if this helps unless you already have this set with patch 3. Defect#SW00309893 which is going to be tentatively fixed in the RKM7.5 Below is what we did as a temporary

Re: RKM Timeouts

2010-01-08 Thread Joe D'Souza
Tauf may be onto something.. However his response reminded me of something else.. I had a similar issue not too long ago with a customer and after having checked the same suggestion given by Tauf, and it failing to work even after that, I remember being given a 'patched' jar file by Remedy that I

OT: RKM Timeouts

2010-01-08 Thread Chowdhury, Tauf
I just looked at my post... and something I didn't catch the first time. I wonder what BMC means by tentatively fixed in RKM 7.5 I wish I could tentatively fix things. That way, even if it's not fixed, I could say that it was tentative to begin with! Tauf Chowdhury | Forest Laboratories, Inc.

Re: RKM Timeouts

2010-01-08 Thread Tommy Morris
It's like being a little pregnant or mostly dead. -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Chowdhury, Tauf Sent: Friday, January 08, 2010 12:48 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: OT: RKM Timeouts I just looked at

Re: RKM Timeouts

2010-01-08 Thread Chowdhury, Tauf
James, One other thing that I TOTALLY forgot about. Even AFTER we applied BMC's suggestion about the 4 AL's, some users were having this issue and it was User tool specific. It ended up that for those users, all we had to do was delete the contents of the User tool Home directory with the

Re: RKM Timeouts

2010-01-08 Thread Lyle Taylor
Actually, that is the recommendation that we received from BMC, and it is not the right course of action to take - it was in fact what was causing our timeout issues here. The reason is that removing the Run If qualification causes a new SessionID to get created every time you open the Help

Re: OT: RKM Timeouts

2010-01-08 Thread Lyle Taylor
That seems to mean to me that they don't have a clear understanding of the problem, and hence don't know if they've really fixed the issue(s). They think they might have but are waiting to see if they see more issues around it... Lyle -Original Message- From: Action Request System

Re: RKM Timeouts

2010-01-08 Thread Nowak, James
On a recommendation from our support vendor we made the following change to the AL KMS:HD_Create_SessionID and KMS:Main_Create_SessionID. This was due to an issue where we were getting Invalid Session errors: They recommended one of the following solutions: 1. Make sure AL

Re: EIE Exchange field mapping

2010-01-08 Thread Kelly Deaver
** You should have a look at SMS2CMD mapping on BMC Developer Network - http://communities.bmc.com/communities/docs/DOC-2851 We used these values - Model = SMS.v_GS_Computer_System.Model0 Will that work for you? Kelly Deaverkdea...@kellydeaver.com(ARSlist mail) Original Message

Re: RKM Timeouts

2010-01-08 Thread Lyle Taylor
Jim, I'm almost certain that taking action 1 will eventually result in timeout errors, even if it's not the cause of what you're currently seeing. That is essentially the same as what BMC recommended as Tauf outlined in his e-mail (having 1=1 or no Run If qualification will both cause the

Table Qualification

2010-01-08 Thread Boylan, David
I have a table field where I want to show requests that have to be signed off by the login user. There is a 4x7 possibility - 7 groups and one of 4 approvers can approve. So, here's my qualification. This works except the table field is showing all Statuses. I just want to show Proposed. ARS keeps

Re: collection of servers

2010-01-08 Thread DCI Remedy
Based on the definition and example for Cluster, I think the Component relationship is the way to go. Hope that helps. Ed On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Martinez, Marcelo A marc...@cpchem.comwrote: ** Tell me if this makes sense: Source: Server Group A (Class: BMC_Cluster) Destination:

Re: Table Qualification

2010-01-08 Thread Brittain, Mark
Hi Dave, I think you are off by a close bracket after Approver 28' = $USER$. What I do in the case is break out and then count the open and closed brackets. I would suggest moving the Status to front. Usually Status is indexed and if so your performance will be better. ( 'Status' = Proposed)

Re: Table Qualification

2010-01-08 Thread Boylan, David
Hi Mark, Strangely enough, I tried that and I get a qualification line error at position (1070). This would be the final paren. I even tried copy and pasting your text and still get the same error. ARS insists on removing the ) at the end and putting one at the front. I'm still scratching my

Re: Table Qualification

2010-01-08 Thread Chris Danaceau
Try adding an extra set of parens after 'Status' = Proposed AND (... all the other stuff ...) You want to make sure the status is evaluated completely separately from the other pieces of the statement. Without this extra set of parens the Status phrase will be evalueated with your

Re: Table Qualification

2010-01-08 Thread Thad K Esser
** I think there was also a missing parentheses after Approver 27 = $USER$ Try this: ( 'Status' = Proposed) AND ( (( 'Approve' = $NULL$ ) AND (( 'Approver 1' = $USER$) OR ( 'Approver 8' = $USER$) OR ( 'Approver 15' = $USER$) OR ( 'Approver 22' = $USER$))) OR (( 'Approve2' = $NULL$ ) AND ((

Re: Table Qualification

2010-01-08 Thread Boylan, David
Thanks everyone! I used Thad's and it worked. Have a good weekend. Dave ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: Where the Answers Are

Re: Data types are not appropriate for relational operation, 313, error message

2010-01-08 Thread Rod Harris
For those that are having trouble with the View Relationships feature I would persevere if you can. I know that it only works if your server is 7.5 and it is enabled but it is probably the single best feature for me in DS. I'm finding that an enormous amount of the opening of workflow is from the

Checked Fixed Licenses

2010-01-08 Thread Tim Rondeau
Hi All, Arsystem 7.1 patch 7 SQL 2005 Anyone have issue with assigning fixed application licenses like Incident Fixed User or Change fixed user license? Filter: CTM:PPG:Add_100_ChkLicenseFixed Keeps coming back then to: CTM:PPG:Add_105_NoFixed-E Saying that all fixed Incident User licenses