Hi,
As we all know that AIE is being replaced by a more powerful tool called AI.
What is the dependency of AI over server grouping?
What I mean to say is does Server grouping affects the behaviour of AI?
Regards,
Neo
Hi,
Does anyone know How AI is affected by Server grouping?
Regards,
Neo
___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years
Hi Neo,
The AI wasn’t supported on server group till 7.6.04. It’s now supported on
server group with 8.x I believe.
Cheers
Rishi
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Neo Phoenix adarsh.hedon...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know How AI is affected by Server grouping?
Regards,
Neo
Hi,
AI can be controlled through the Server Group Ranking form as any other Admin
operation can be. Only one server is active at a time.
Kind Regards,
Carl Wilson
http://www.missingpiecessoftware.com/
-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
Yes, AI is supported in Server group environment in 8.x onwards.
-Raman
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Carl Wilson carlbwil...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
AI can be controlled through the Server Group Ranking form as any other
Admin operation can be. Only one server is active at a time.
Kind
managers being managers: can we change the status of the CI classes in the
cmdb.
Has anyone does this?
any gotcha's?
just asking.. if you have and the issues you found. Thanks.
Classes currently are ordered, received, being assembled, deployed, in
repair, down, end of life, transferred, delete,
Sure, you can! You can also tug on Superman's cape and pee into the wind.
All are very bad ideas, however.
You CAN change the verbiage in the values without much issue, but the
values themselves are set up with linear, not custom DB IDs.
I suppose if you wanted to live on the edge, you change
Well : I know the managers answer :: because I can
I love your answer by the way ! LOL..
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Rick Cook remedyr...@gmail.com wrote:
**
Sure, you can! You can also tug on Superman's cape and pee into the
wind. All are very bad ideas, however.
You CAN change
A couple of the values are used by workflow such as Ordered, Received,
Deployed, In Inventory, and Delete. The others may but I am not sure.
Ordered and Received are used by both Purchasing and Receiving console. If
you change the values, it may screw up a bunch of these systems. I am 99%
sure
I was just reading some of the online documentation for CMDB 8.x yesterday,
and there have been some structural changes to the CMDB, where they have
moved many of the asset attributes from being tracked on the CMDB forms
over to being tracked in an AST:Attributes form. One of those attributes
was
Hello David,
As it was explained to me and through reading the SSO integration white
paper capturing the user ID should be all that is needed to get the user
logged in at that point.
I think there is some confusion here. For SSO to work in general with
Midtier, there has to be some work done
Even AssetID has vanished from BMC_CORE_BMC_BASEELEMENT in 8.x.
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Thad Esser
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 9:04 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: cmdb asset status change computer systems
**
Yes, we have the plugin and we can get sso to function. The issue is that we
get random lockouts for the users when they are coming in through the mid-tier.
It doesn't happen to everyone at the same time. There have been times where it
does not affect a given user for several days. Then they
Just a note to all: As one who received a new Kidney about a year ago, this is
a day to think about your kidney health.
Remember that as of 2011, one in 10 American adults, more than 20 million, have
some level of kidney disease. Out of that only about 4 million know about it.
Also the average
I do have to say however that when I could not get an ARX file to import
using the 7.6.04 SP2 Data Import tool I was advised by BMC Support to use
the 8.0 Data Import tool instead and it resolved the problem. We never did
figure out why an ARX exported from a server at the same code level threw
Documentation on fields that were moved in 8.0:
https://docs.bmc.com/docs/display/public/itsm80/Updates+to+CI+lifecycle+data+attributes
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Yogesh Ketkar
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 10:18 AM
To:
And not only does drinking water help clean out your kidneys, but it gives your
kidneys the fluids they need to cleanse your system so your liver doesn't have
to. When your liver doesn't have to do the work of your kidneys, it can devote
more energy to (among other things) burning FAT! Given
The Bmc OOTB SSO Plugin is very easy to break since it only depends on http
header authentication. It has nothing to do with LDAP or AD. the scenario
changes if you use the basic SSO with site minder or an external authentication
plugin with a hub.
The best way you can start troubleshooting
Nope no need for any additional workflows you can use the identification rules
to weed out duplicates.
Regards,
Roney Samuel Varghese.
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 14, 2013, at 3:16 PM, Kathy Morris kathymorris...@aol.com wrote:
**
Hello everyone,
We are running RE jobs and getting
I am not sure what else I can modify the identification rules to.
I am using the out of box rules and it is not working.
Which criteria should I add to the rules?
Thanks
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Roney Samuel Varghese.
I am not sure who you are NEO but it shouldn't matter for basic
transformations since Atrium Integrator uses the same Remedy API as the client
or AO or another integration point.
Regards,
Roney Samuel Varghese.
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 14, 2013, at 3:27 AM, NeoPhoenix
Howdy,
I flagged this as off-topic since it really isn't a Remedy question per se,
though it does involve a Remedy system.
We need to send different kinds of notifications from ARS to various
distribution lists. We would rather not build up these lists within ARS
(mainly because many of the
Take a look at mailgun.net and their concept of mailing lists. It's an
enterprise quality service, affordable, and easy to setup/use.
thanks,
David
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Joe Castleman joe.castle...@gmail.comwrote:
**
Howdy,
I flagged this as off-topic since it really isn't a
Which classes of CI’s are failing?
If the recon identification is finding duplicates can you see any data for
these duplicates that distinguish them? If so, use that data in the rules.
IMHO the otb identification rules are not so good so you might consider using
your own based on the
We set up distribution lists on our corporate email system then just set Remedy
to email the notification to the smtp address of the distribution list.
Example:
dl-sap-ugrent-issue-not...@company.commailto:dl-sap-ugrent-issue-not...@company.com
The members of the dl for our notifications are
To Peter's point, first make sure you are not getting duplicates from ADDM
by checking within the ADDM data set. Sometimes, something like network
adapter change can cause ADDM to think a machine is new and creates a new
record for it but to you, it looks like a dupe.
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar
I've been down that rabbit hole and the potential problems are an enormous
headache.
The problem with using a commercial service to handle your mailing list is
that you're very dependent on not only their infrastructure, but their
reputation as well.
All it takes is one of their *other*
27 matches
Mail list logo
