Sorry late on this thread -
Anyone have the size info for the first 7.5 patch 5 release of
ARSuiteKitSolaris.tar.gz? The one I had downloaded is 496,314,432 bytes.
I haven't unpacked it yet, but got it before June 9, so I'm thinking
that's before the revision was out (assuming that's a June 24
Hi,
First release:
496 314 432 ARSuiteKitSolaris.tar.gz
Second release:
500 563 654 ARSuiteKitSolaris.tar.gz
Regards,
Jarl
2010/7/15 David Durling durl...@uga.edu:
Sorry late on this thread -
Anyone have the size info for the first 7.5 patch 5 release of
ARSuiteKitSolaris.tar.gz? The
Excellent questions - I would pay for the answers.. :)
Marcelo
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Guillaume Rheault
Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2010 11:08 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: AR System 7.5.00 Patch 005 and 7.1.00 Patch
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: AR System 7.5.00 Patch 005 and 7.1.00 Patch 010
**
Any word on why specifically they were recalled?
Mike, what version and patch are you on and what are the problems you are
encountering?
Joe
-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list
-negligible impact.
Guillaume
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [arsl...@arslist.org] on
behalf of Rick Cook [remedyr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 5:06 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: AR System 7.5.00 Patch 005 and 7.1.00
Hmm. Just received a support announcement for the withdrawal of AR System
7.5.00 Patch 005 and 7.1.00 Patch 010.
Dave
Dave Shellman
Phone: (717) 810-3687
Fax:(717) 810-2124
email: dave.shell...@tycoelectronics.com
Tyco Electronics
MS 161-043
PO Box 3608
Harrisburg, PA 17105-3607
010
**
Hmm. Just received a support announcement for the withdrawal of AR System
7.5.00 Patch 005 and 7.1.00 Patch 010.
Dave
Dave Shellman
Phone: (717) 810-3687
Fax:(717) 810-2124
email: dave.shell...@tycoelectronics.com
Tyco Electronics
MS 161-043
PO Box 3608
Harrisburg, PA 17105-3607
@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: AR System 7.5.00 Patch 005 and 7.1.00 Patch 010
**
Too late for us, unfortunately … my DEV server is a WRECK!
.:Mike:.
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Shellman, David
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 12:13 PM
...@arslist.org] on
behalf of Tomasiewicz, Mike (Information Technology)
[mike.tomasiew...@conagrafoods.com]
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 1:33 PM
To: arsl...@arslist.org
Subject: Re: AR System 7.5.00 Patch 005 and 7.1.00 Patch 010
**
Too late for us, unfortunately … my DEV server is a WRECK
BMC thought it proper to issue a flash warning about the issue and to withdraw
the patch until a fix could be put in place. The issue is described in the
flash announcement:
A licensing and audit issue was fixed in AR System 7.5.00 patch 005
(SW00369044)
and 7.1.00 patch 010 (SW00369045
be put in place. The issue is
described in the flash announcement:
A licensing and audit issue was fixed in AR System 7.5.00 patch 005
(SW00369044)
and 7.1.00 patch 010 (SW00369045). The fix for this issue causes a higher
than
expected memory usage, which could result in the AR System server
Technology)
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 1:34 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: AR System 7.5.00 Patch 005 and 7.1.00 Patch 010
**
Too late for us, unfortunately . my DEV server is a WRECK!
.:Mike:.
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl
]on Behalf Of Rick Cook
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 2:02 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: AR System 7.5.00 Patch 005 and 7.1.00 Patch 010
** Will its replacement be also named patch 5/10, or will it be given a
new number? I would think it proper procedure to give it a new number
...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Easter, David
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 11:58 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: AR System 7.5.00 Patch 005 and 7.1.00 Patch 010
BMC thought it proper to issue a flash warning about the issue and to
withdraw the patch until a fix could be put in place. The issue
(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Easter, David
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 11:58 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: AR System 7.5.00 Patch 005 and 7.1.00 Patch 010
BMC thought it proper to issue a flash warning about the issue and to
withdraw the patch until a fix could
discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Shellman, David
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 12:13 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: AR System 7.5.00 Patch 005 and 7.1.00 Patch 010
**
Hmm. Just received a support announcement for the withdrawal of AR System
7.5.00 Patch 005
: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Rick Cook
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 11:19 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: AR System 7.5.00 Patch 005 and 7.1.00 Patch 010
** Indeed. I appreciate how BMC has improved their release processes over
list(ARSList) [mailto:
arsl...@arslist.org] *On Behalf Of *Rick Cook
*Sent:* Friday, July 09, 2010 11:19 AM
*To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
*Subject:* Re: AR System 7.5.00 Patch 005 and 7.1.00 Patch 010
** Indeed. I appreciate how BMC has improved their release processes over
the past few years
@ARSLIST.ORG
Date: 07/09/2010 02:28 PM
Subject:Re: AR System 7.5.00 Patch 005 and 7.1.00 Patch 010
Sent by:Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
**
While I don?t disagree, operational issues internally do not enable the
issuance of an externally visible
discussion list(ARSList) [arsl...@arslist.org] on
behalf of Rick Cook [remedyr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 3:37 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: AR System 7.5.00 Patch 005 and 7.1.00 Patch 010
** So we have two versions of 7.5 patch 5, and will soon probably have a third
representative for BMC Software,
Inc.
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Rick Cook
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 11:19 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: AR System 7.5.00 Patch 005 and 7.1.00 Patch 010
** Indeed. I appreciate
:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [
arsl...@arslist.org] on behalf of Rick Cook [remedyr...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Friday, July 09, 2010 3:37 PM
*To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
*Subject:* Re: AR System 7.5.00 Patch 005 and 7.1.00 Patch 010
** So we have two versions of 7.5 patch 5
relations representative for BMC Software, Inc.
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of LJ LongWing
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 12:53 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: AR System 7.5.00 Patch 005 and 7.1.00 Patch 010
**
Ok...so original Patch 5
...@arslist.org] *On Behalf Of *LJ LongWing
*Sent:* Friday, July 09, 2010 12:53 PM
*To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
*Subject:* Re: AR System 7.5.00 Patch 005 and 7.1.00 Patch 010
**
Ok…so original Patch 5 is still good, if you are willing to deal with the
license stuff problems.
*From:* Action
seen it
Guillaume
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [arsl...@arslist.org] on
behalf of Rick Cook [remedyr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 3:55 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: AR System 7.5.00 Patch 005 and 7.1.00 Patch 010
...@arslist.org] on behalf of Rick Cook [remedyr...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Friday, July 09, 2010 3:55 PM
*To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
*Subject:* Re: AR System 7.5.00 Patch 005 and 7.1.00 Patch 010
** And do we really want to start a discussion about why an industry
leader in the creation and selling
*To:* arsl...@arslist.org
*Subject:* Re: AR System 7.5.00 Patch 005 and 7.1.00 Patch 010
**
While I don’t disagree, operational issues internally do not enable the
issuance of an externally visible “005A” or such in terms of patch numbering
at this time. However, the version string
: AR System 7.5.00 Patch 005 and 7.1.00 Patch 010
**
Why not Eating your won food should be a principle for every corporation.
Two examples that come to mind: HP and Oracle. HP embarked in a huge project to
consolidate all its data centers; at the end of that project, they will be able
to tell
, 2010 3:10 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: AR System 7.5.00 Patch 005 and 7.1.00 Patch 010
**
your recovery tool is:
- a database restore
- a server restore
Even if BMC developed something to rollback an install or a patch, it's
much better to rely on your own tools to recover
Pierson
*From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
arsl...@arslist.org] *On Behalf Of *Guillaume Rheault
*Sent:* Friday, July 09, 2010 3:12 PM
*To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
*Subject:* Re: AR System 7.5.00 Patch 005 and 7.1.00 Patch 010
**
Why not Eating your won food
...@arslist.org] on behalf of Rick Cook [remedyr...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Friday, July 09, 2010 3:55 PM
*To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
*Subject:* Re: AR System 7.5.00 Patch 005 and 7.1.00 Patch 010
** And do we really want to start a discussion about why an industry
leader in the creation and selling of tools
31 matches
Mail list logo
