[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Testing 24-bit, 96 kHz FLAC?

2006-10-20 Thread stevo
I thought that this was worth reading. http://www.hifi-writer.com/he/dvdaudio/dvdvscd.htm First, my preconceptions: I was inclined to think that there would be no audible differences between the two media. For me at least. On the other hand, I earnestly hoped that I would hear some difference

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: why didn't cd players ever re-buffer?

2006-10-20 Thread cliveb
audioengr;147899 Wrote: If you have either of these CD's below, I will write new a low-jitter copy of one of them with my modded CD copier and ship it to you. Then report back on whether you can hear a difference between your commercial disk and my copy on a standard CD player. Then, I

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Testing 24-bit, 96 kHz FLAC?

2006-10-20 Thread cliveb
Pat Farrell;148007 Wrote: ntom wrote:[color=blue] Was just giving some thought to recording my album collection for SB3. Anyone have a view as to whether it would be worth attempting 24/96 recording? My personal opinion is that 16/44.1 is plenty good enough for vinyl transfers,

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Testing 24-bit, 96 kHz FLAC?

2006-10-20 Thread tommypeters
krochat;144804 Wrote: Starting with SlimServer 6.5, 24/96 material is downsampled on the server side to 24/48 prior to sending it to the SB3. It still sounds very similar to the 24/96 feed direct from my PC. I think I've read that this is instead done on the SB side, the SB3 is simply

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Transporter problem

2006-10-20 Thread PhilNYC
Have you made sure that the volume is on? Try pressing the up-volume on the remote and see if that does anything... -- PhilNYC Sonic Spirits Inc. http://www.sonicspirits.com PhilNYC's Profile:

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Effect of SB3 volume control

2006-10-20 Thread dlite
some education guy's why does the signal begin to deteriorate? I assume for the highest quality you are best to disable the digital volume control and use an external amp to boost/lower the signal? Michael -- dlite

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Logitech

2006-10-20 Thread Kyle
Clearly, it was the earnings. I'm sure the analysts have no idea whether $20 million for Slim Devices is a good price or a bad price (and in fact, in most cases acquiring companies see their stock drop on such announcements). I did see mention that LOGI is known for making favorable

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: F/X loop

2006-10-20 Thread dlite
I am interested in this too. Living in an apartment room correction I am sure will benefit me, I remember reading on here once about the possibility of using room correction on a PC before sending the digital signal to the sb3/transporter... don't know what happened with this. -- dlite

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Logitech

2006-10-20 Thread highdudgeon
I'm just surprised that SD sold out so soon. Okay, twenty million is a lot and I'm sure that Sean Company are popping bottles of champagne. Still, the Transporter is very new to market and the company is bound to revolve over the year. In terms of branding, they might have trouble with the

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: F/X loop

2006-10-20 Thread highdudgeon
it exists -- search for Inguz under these threads. Still, I use an EQ in the digital domain between the SB3 and Lavry. My Transporter arrives today and I would like to be able to use EQ with it. dlite;148126 Wrote: I am interested in this too. Living in an apartment room correction I am

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Effect of SB3 volume control

2006-10-20 Thread highdudgeon
You mean integrated amp, right? There's a big difference between an integrated amp -- it includes a preamp or line stage component -- and an amplifier (or power amplifier). Not to be a pest, but it seems like people on this forum confuse the two. Anyway, yes: the commonly recommended method

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Logitech

2006-10-20 Thread adamslim
highdudgeon;148139 Wrote: I'm just surprised that SD sold out so soon. Okay, twenty million is a lot and I'm sure that Sean Company are popping bottles of champagne. Still, the Transporter is very new to market and the company is bound to revolve over the year. In terms of branding, they

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Logitech

2006-10-20 Thread Deaf Cat
adamslim;148192 Wrote: The Squeezebox is always gone to be the one that makes money - it's actually somewhat perverse that SD have gone from mass-market to upmarket. One would normally expect a high-end 'proof of concept' first, followed by a mass-market product (often better than the

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Logitech

2006-10-20 Thread slimpy
Excellent post Adam! You've put into words what I feel since this deal was anounced. -s. -- slimpy slimpy's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1524 View this thread:

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Logitech

2006-10-20 Thread amthar
My concern is how friendly will Logitech be to the enthusiast scene? Will they continue to put out the SlimServer for free? Will they try and squish the SoftSqueeze? These are my concerns, as this is what lead me to being a fan of SD. -- amthar

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Logitech

2006-10-20 Thread radish
amthar;148233 Wrote: Will they continue to put out the SlimServer for free? Will they try and squish the SoftSqueeze? They have no control over Slimserver, it's open source and they don't own it. Softsqueeze is also GPL, although the primary (only?) dev works for SD (now Logitech). But if

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Logitech

2006-10-20 Thread jeffluckett
radish;148237 Wrote: They have no control over Slimserver, it's open source and they don't own it. Softsqueeze is also GPL, although the primary (only?) dev works for SD (now Logitech). But if for some reason they did stop development of it inhouse, there's nothing stopping someone else

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Transporter problem

2006-10-20 Thread EFP
If you plug in your Transporter and hold down the '1' button on the remote, what happens? -- EFP EFP's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=6651 View this thread:

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Transporter Digital Inputs

2006-10-20 Thread TiredLegs
radish;145847 Wrote: The answer is yes - it'll act as DAC and preamp. The inputs are selectable via a menu. Just out of curiosity, what menu is used for this selection? I don't see it described anywhere in the Transporter manual. -- TiredLegs

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: why didn't cd players ever re-buffer?

2006-10-20 Thread SoftwireEngineer
Re: the Prism test - I am not sure it is highly objective. Looks like it must have been done with an agenda i.e. jitter rejecting DACs are a must to have good playback. Saving grace, they say the work is on-going. Read the part below - None of the disc-related or servo-related artifacts was

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: why didn't cd players ever re-buffer?

2006-10-20 Thread audioengr
opaqueice;148096 Wrote: OK, I'm not an electrical engineer, so probably this is a stupid question - but I still don't get it. As far as I understand, there is a PLL locked to a crystal oscillator in the CD player.The data stream coming from reading the disc will be jittery, as you're

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: minor problem

2006-10-20 Thread bgrounds
Didn't notice those Windows XP Apple Lossless Slimp3 Not using itunes to manage Wired Using Digital -- bgrounds bgrounds's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2314 View this thread:

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Getting Transporter combo in Canada

2006-10-20 Thread Mark Lanctot
Just got my Transporter today. It was shipped 2 days ago and was actually supposed to arrive yesterday but got caught up in customs. It might have made it, both my SB2 and my SB3 got here within 18 hours! Anyway I was charged PST + GST. Maybe I should be quiet about this, but no

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: minor problem

2006-10-20 Thread Pale Blue Ego
When you playback Apple Lossless on Slimserver, it decodes it, either to WAV, AIFF, or FLAC. You might try changing that setting. -- Pale Blue Ego Pale Blue Ego's Profile:

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Transporter problem

2006-10-20 Thread FB67
Thank you for the replies so far. I’m busted right now but will try out your suggested actions in the weekend. I will give feed back. Best regards Flemming -- FB67 FB67's Profile:

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Transporter Arrived!

2006-10-20 Thread Mark Lanctot
Mine just arrived! I'm taking photos but they won't look as good as WSLam's. Besides, they're of the same thing - I got the black unit too. Haven't connected up yet, but I will shortly. I fear the rest of my system is not up to the task though. -- Mark Lanctot

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: minor problem

2006-10-20 Thread jeffluckett
Using Digital It you're using digital out to a DAC or your receiver, it's important to note that SOME devices have a delay from the time they first start receiving a digital stream up until they start actually decoding that stream. Since you aren't using a native format, you aren't getting

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Transporter Digital Inputs

2006-10-20 Thread radish
TiredLegs;148271 Wrote: Just out of curiosity, what menu is used for this selection? I don't see it described anywhere in the Transporter manual. I believe it's implemented as a plugin and so can be moved around, but by default it's on the top level of the menu and is called (IIRC) Digital

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Transporter Arrived!

2006-10-20 Thread ModelCitizen
Mark Lanctot;148325 Wrote: Mine just arrived! I'm taking photos but they won't look as good as WSLam's. Besides, they're of the same thing - I got the black unit too. Haven't connected up yet, but I will shortly. I fear the rest of my system is not up to the task though. Hang the photos,

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Logitech

2006-10-20 Thread radish
Sure, I was thinking about this at lunch time. They could indeed change the slimproto implementation to lock out slimserver, but the firmware upgrade can't be forced so those of us with existing units can just stick with the existing firmware. Look at the Sony PSP - many people are running old

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Transporter Arrived!

2006-10-20 Thread Mark Lanctot
ModelCitizen;148329 Wrote: Hang the photos, what does it sound like? MC Gotta do some rearranging of my audio equipment first to connect it. -- Mark Lanctot Mark Lanctot's Profile:

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Logitech

2006-10-20 Thread jeffluckett
radish;148331 Wrote: Sure, I was thinking about this at lunch time. They could indeed change the slimproto implementation to lock out slimserver, but the firmware upgrade can't be forced so those of us with existing units can just stick with the existing firmware. Look at the Sony PSP - many

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Another volume control question

2006-10-20 Thread boybees
Slim Server 6.5. Under the Squeezebox device settings, audio tab, you've got an option called preamp volume control, which attenuates output to the analog outs only. Apparently this is to set a limit on how far you can turn up the digital volume on Slimserver/Squeezebox remote; in other words,

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Logitech

2006-10-20 Thread Patrick Dixon
adamslim;148192 Wrote: I don't want to do SD down, but theirs is a new market, and there are several players who will enter it when it becomes more mainstream. They are probably making OK profits now, but they could easily collapse in the future to a large entrant with serious resources.

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Logitech

2006-10-20 Thread radish
Isn't Logitech Swiss? I don't think being successful is limited to the US :) Although why there aren't more internationally successful tech companies from the UK is a very valid question. Since the Amstrad and Sinclair days it's all gone a little cold. Rio were UK based, and did awesome stuff

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Logitech

2006-10-20 Thread CardinalFang
radish;148357 Wrote: Although why there aren't more internationally successful tech companies from the UK is a very valid question. Since the Amstrad and Sinclair days it's all gone a little cold. Rio were UK based, and did awesome stuff until they went bust recently. There are lot of

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Transporter Arrived!

2006-10-20 Thread Mark Lanctot
...well, what can I say that hasn't already been said? I was hesitant that I wouldn't hear a difference on my system, but I can. I played some tracks I know very well and I could definitely hear a difference. For some reason I'm especially sensitive in the high frequency region, and I heard

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Effect of SB3 volume control

2006-10-20 Thread dlite
highdudgeon;148149 Wrote: You mean integrated amp, right? There's a big difference between an integrated amp -- it includes a preamp or line stage component -- and an amplifier (or power amplifier). Not to be a pest, but it seems like people on this forum confuse the two. Anyway, yes:

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Effect of SB3 volume control

2006-10-20 Thread highdudgeon
You have a good preamp. Just max out the digital volume in slim server, use the volume control on your pre, and call it a night. That's all you need to know. dlite;148394 Wrote: Thanks I meant a pre amplifier actually, I do understand the difference well but am a little unsure why the

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Another volume control question

2006-10-20 Thread slimpy
As far as I understand there is absolutely no analog attenuation in the squeezebox. The transporter has jumpers for analog attenuation. -s. -- slimpy slimpy's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1524

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter arrived -- volume attenuation question, help?

2006-10-20 Thread highdudgeon
So, my Transporter arrived - sounds and looks great! One thing: because I am not using a line stage before my amp, I immediately opened the case and moved the analog attenuation pins to -30db. Well, with the volume bar half way across, it is loud as sin. I am using XLR outputs. Does this

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Transporter Arrived!

2006-10-20 Thread Mark Lanctot
Another silly observation, but it brought back memories - the manual is spiral-bound. I did that for several summers back in high school. I'd say an 8 mm spiral where a 6 mm would do. Very easy to bind, I could do 300 of those an hour. The person doing it was rushing - the ends are barely

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Transporter arrived -- volume attenuation question, help?

2006-10-20 Thread highdudgeon
Answered my own question -- DUH. XLR is XLR and under a different specification. The attenuaition thing is for RCA only. Good thing my amp takes balanced or RCA. Anyway, if anyone is curious, I set the attenuation to -30db. That's too much. With the volume maxed out it's not exactly loud.

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: A photo of your Squeezebox setup (please)

2006-10-20 Thread khedspeth
A poll associated with this post was created, to vote and see the results, please visit http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=19817 Question:

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Effect of SB3 volume control

2006-10-20 Thread DCtoDaylight
Well, I would argue, that if someone wants the whole story, theres no real need to keep it a secret! The SB (and Transporter) volume controls work on the digital signal, before it goes to the DAC. The usual problem with this, is that as you turn the volume down, you decrease the number of bit's

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] External Power Conditioner for Transporter?

2006-10-20 Thread daipat
Transporter has super regulators for its power supply. Does this mean there is no need to hook it up to power conditioners like Hydra / Richard Grays? Any thoughts on this are welcomed. Pat -- daipat daipat's Profile:

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: IR map editing for Transporter

2006-10-20 Thread gobikey
i just added the digital inputs as favorites. adding them seemed harder than it should have, but it works fine now. -- gobikey ___ flac with accuraterip silver transporter (the reflective surface minimizes interference. just kidding. ; ) audioquest vdm-5