First of all, sorry for my bad English.
I just want to share some of my impressions regarding SPDIF jive_alsa
value settings:
By moving back forward of those, I settled finaly to
SPDIF 45 jive_alsa 45 for best musical balance and coherence over the
whole frequency spectrum.
Suggested
Are the dynobot's mods compatible with soundcheck's SB Toolbox 3.0?
Thanks in advance.
--
Fukinagashi
Fukinagashi's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=42922
View this thread:
Fukinagashi;667098 Wrote:
Are the dynobot's mods compatible with soundcheck's SB Toolbox 3.0?
Thanks in advance.
in soundcheck's blog he says maybe not and suggests that one not use
both at the same time as this could be doing something unexpected. He
says he does something similar to
Huge thanks Klaus!
Installed and donation made.
What is the recommended version of server to use?
I use the latest official 7.6.1 (and I am using all Flac so no
disappearing files), but is there any other benefit using the latest
nightly 7.6.2 build?
--
HumanMedia
Hi guys, I tired on two computers and have the same difficulty, the
imbedded pictures doesnt display at all. A lot of settings are shown
on those pictures. Does anyone have the same problem?
BTW I think that TT 3.0 deserves it own tread
Chris
--
krzys
Assuming you have tt 3.0 installed, try changing the priority of the
spdif process to 51.
chrt -f -p 51 367
Is it just me and my setup, or does this improve things further?
(softer more natural highs)
--
HumanMedia
Is it me or does the bass seem reduced a little with 3.0?
I'm just wondering if this new definition and clarity we are are all
hearing is coming at a price of losing some bottom end and fullness.
--
Jeff Flowerday
Jeff
oops installed 3.0 while having dynobot's in place,haven't noticed
anything weird but just to be sure how does one turn off bot's mods or
do i have to do a complete factory reset and start over?
--
c-eling
c-eling's
First off, I want to thank Klaus for his efforts and for sharing them
with the world. I've been delighted with the 2.0 toolbox and feel it's
brought by system to a level that I have never heard before. A donation
is on the way.
I did all the 3.0 installs except screen off, and sat down to a
Jeff Flowerday;667148 Wrote:
Is it me or does the bass seem reduced a little with 3.0?
I'm just wondering if this new definition and clarity we are are all
hearing is coming at a price of losing some bottom end and fullness.
I've found that bass seems better, or at least fuller, with tt3
A hard rest was recommended by Soundcheck before installing 3.0. Which
should clear Dynobots mods.
--
mjock3
mjock3's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=49183
View this thread:
ok thanks,I'm going to give it a few more listens,but I'm not quite sure
if it did any harm,my Talking Heads 24/96 sounds amazing
--
c-eling
c-eling's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=48050
View
I'll fork into a new thread from here, if that is OK with you.
Of course a lot of interesting stuff discussed over here will get
lost over time.
Anyhow. Sometimes it's good to start over.
One hint.
Instead of rolling back certain features you should try to find certain
other bottlenecks. I
Just done the fork.
Thx to all your valuable contributions over here. To be continued over
there:
'soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0'
(http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91322)
--
soundcheck
::: ' Touch Toolbox 3.0 and more' (http://soundcheck-audio.blogspot.com)
::: by soundcheck
Hi folks.
I think it's time to close the 2.0 chapter and start over with TT3.0
over here.
Looking forward to your constructive feedback and discussions.
Cheers
--
soundcheck
::: ' Touch Toolbox 3.0 and more' (http://soundcheck-audio.blogspot.com)
::: by soundcheck
Takeovers from the TT.20 thread.
Human Media commented:
Assuming you have tt 3.0 installed, try changing the priority of the
spdif process to 51.
chrt -f -p 51 367
I left it at 40 intentionally (quite some time back though). I also
played with the value. You'll see that I got the interrupt
Another finetuning subject is the buffer setting.
The closer we get to the system limits the more difficult it gets to
tune the instrument.
Some people won't get below 4000us without ending up into XRUNS.
Others run at 3400us without problems.
Which is strange. Over here I know of several
First of all I want to thanx Souncheck for the passion and the
competence.
I used TT 2.0 with satisfaction for some time and I was waiting for
TT3.0 improvements.
The first impressions with TT3.0 in my system are not positive : the
sound is emptied , much more digital , too much highs. The sound
I've got the same impression as Mr Bellow, just maybe not as extreme as
a little radio. Everything is thinner in my opinion.
TT3.0 wireless disabled, all mods include daemon killer on. Buffer set
at 3600, just because I don't like riding the edge of stable.
Touch-Black Cat Veloce-Rega Dac-BJ
Mr Bellow;667193 Wrote:
...The sound is more defined and detailed...
That's what I like to see. Sometimes it's shocking. I know. ;)
More natural and and especially soft sounding is how many many systems
out there sound.
The key challenge is to have a smooth silky sound with all the details
Klaus, I use a HRT dac via usb, with TT2 installed (works great). Any
reason why this shouldn't work just as well with TT3, assuming I change
the buffer size etc ?
Thanks
--
john4456
john4456's Profile:
john4456;667207 Wrote:
Klaus, I use a HRT dac via usb, with TT2 installed (works great). Any
reason why this shouldn't work just as well with TT3, assuming I change
the buffer size etc ?
Thanks
NO - it should work. Maybe on the analog (port 1) though. USB might get
assigned to port 1 by
Usually all the instruments and voices become more of a point source
with lots of air around them. The face or better voice of a singer is
no
longer 20 inches wide, it goes down to 2 inches
I don't agree with this, my experience as the system gets better
better, all the point sources expand
soundcheck;667202 Wrote:
That's what I like to see. Sometimes it's shocking. I know. ;)
More natural and especially soft sounding is how many many systems out
there sound.
The key challenge is to have a smooth silky and still extremely dynamic
sound with all the details in place.
Usually all the instruments and voices become more of a point source
with lots of air around them. The face or better voice of a singer is
no
longer 20 inches wide, it goes down to 2 inches
I don't agree with this, my experience as the system gets better
better, all the point sources expand
Mr Bellow;667193 Wrote:
...The first impressions with TT3.0 in my system are not positive : the
sound is emptied , much more digital , too much highs. The sound is
more defined and detailed but the whole impression is something like
a little radio
Thanks Klaus for the great work.
Same
I have just installed these mods today and am new in this area. I have a
Question. The remote control is disabled after these mods. Is there any
way to enable the remote?
--
Cut-Throat
Cut-Throat's Profile:
Cut-Throat;667229 Wrote:
I have just installed these mods today and am new in this area. I have a
Question. The remote control is disabled after these mods. Is there any
way to enable the remote?
I believe you just run the tt -ir command again.
--
rgro
Rg
System information
Yes, thanks. That did it!
--
Cut-Throat
Cut-Throat's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=43167
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91322
My thoughts at the end of the 2.0 thread:
First off, I want to thank Klaus for his efforts and for sharing them
with the world. I've been delighted with the 2.0 toolbox and feel it's
brought by system to a level that I have never heard before. A donation
is on the way.
I did all the 3.0
Thanks for all your work Klaus.
I have a long-time question that I still haven't figured out by myself:
how do these buffer XRUNS get officially reported to me? Unofficially
reported by ear... Thanks.
--
cfraser
There seems to be as many people pro TT3 as against. Is it the fact that
people have had 1 year to get used to TT2 and suddenly things have
changed that they were not expecting?
Maybe time will tell and listening time will tell.
Presumably those people who were running TT2 can just revert
Hi Soundcheck,
on the USB front I have been working on a udev setup that consistantly
numbers all devices. Its going to need something in rcS or rcS.local
and since you are using that I would like to get it integrated in with
yours so they are not fighting each other.
A while back rgo posted a
Many thanks for all of your efforts on TT3 Klaus. I've spent the evening
tweaking and listening and had some interesting findings:
I've been running TT2 for about 6 months and really enjoyed the
differences it brought over the stock touch. I particularly love the
sound of 24-bit recordings
Lovejoy, do you mean you maxed out the buffer at 5, or 3400?
--
sckramer
CiAudio vdc-Sb - Touch (TT 3.0 mods)
PSaudio DL3 DAC (Cullen 4 mods) - PSaudio Trio C-100 Amp (Cullen 3
mods)
Energy Veritas 2.2i speakers (mundorf silver oil capacitor, inductor,
and resistor mods)
Martin Logan
lovejoy;667285 Wrote:
Many thanks for all of your efforts on TT3 Klaus. I've spent the evening
tweaking and listening and had some interesting findings:
I've been running TT2 for about 6 months and really enjoyed the
differences it brought over the stock touch. I particularly love the
@magiccarpetride:
How much work is it to revert to your modded TT 2.0 if it turns out TT
3.0 is not to your liking? 20 mins?
--
terjehaa
terjehaa's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17451
View this
I switched from 2.0 to 3.0, and then back to 2.0 *plus* dynaudio's mods
for the first time, and at this point I prefer the 2.0 plus dynaudio
mods the most. (I always run with unmodified buffer and screen).
--
Howard Turkster
When I first initialized 3.0 last night, I received a quick error
message along the lines of unknown process. Didn't pay attention to
it, because tt -s reported things installed and working.
Tonight i used tt to do a reset and then reinitialized tt. No error
message this time. Set my buffer
terjehaa;667294 Wrote:
@magiccarpetride:
How much work is it to revert to your modded TT 2.0 if it turns out TT
3.0 is not to your liking? 20 mins?
Amazing! I love when I get proven totally wrong in this fashion.
So you're right, I finally got off my butt earlier this evening, did a
factory
40 matches
Mail list logo
