Zombie wrote:
> Do you have a simple cookbook to "just" set up filtering? I have
> searched but in vain.
If you already have your filter values (center/width/gain), you can
implement them via custom-convert.conf as described here:
artatgray wrote:
> The latter have no problem being passed through the InguzEQ pipeline on
> the way to transcoding. However, the former does not.
Do both types of files play when InguzEQ not installed?
Apesbrain's
artatgray wrote:
> How would I go about producing it?
Inguz EQ produces a log at "C:\ProgramData\InguzEQ\log.txt" in Windows.
It will show you what is happening by track. Also note whether
CLIPPING+ is present in which case you'll need to reduce gain in
"C:\Program
One option is Inguz EQ (search here). I don't know if it runs on
piCorePlayer/LMS; I run it on Windows/LMS. Yes, convolution runs on the
server.
Apesbrain's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=738
JonSqueeze wrote:
>
> What do I do with: InguzReskin_v0.02.zip
Unzip the file and I think the instructions are included. They are also
in the thread I linked.
Apesbrain's Profile:
JonSqueeze wrote:
> I'm having troubles getting InguzEQ to work. The EQ plugin is not
> selectable "not compatible with this version of LMS". LMS version is 8.3
You may need to manually edit the INSTALL.XML file. The MAXVERSION
should say:
Code:
*
I can confirm Inguz is working with LMS 8.3.0 on Windows 7 x86 server.
If you are using Material Skin, go into "Settings" (CTRL+G) and enable
display of the "Extras" menu.
[image: https://i.imgur.com/RjWxOZb.jpg]
Have you considered adding a subwoofer (or two)?
Apesbrain's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=738
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=114970
stosoorok wrote:
> Sometimes there is a little lag (not instant) when browsing folders.I
> understand; too much lag would bother me as well. Taking the VM out
of the equation, a dedicated RPi solution might offer higher
performance. Only way to know is to try it.
I'm not going to argue the
stosoorok wrote:
> So i'm thinking, could there be any _SQ_benefit_ to run LMS on Pi4 or
> x86 machine with SSD storage?
No, unless your current configuration is broken.
Apesbrain's Profile:
cliveb wrote:
> FWIW, I was cured of HiFi upgraditis once I bought a pair of speakers
> that did everything I could ask of them and my system started playing
> music instead of audio.
Amen.
Apesbrain's Profile:
foxesden wrote:
> Yes it is in program data. So what do you mean that the settings don't
> stick? That they no longer appear on the UI or that the player doesn't
> pick them up?
Exactly, the player doesn't pick them up after a server restart.
foxesden wrote:
> I am no expert, but I have been playing around with Inguz lately and the
> eq settings are stored in the Settings folder with file names ending in
> .conf.
Thanks. I've tried editing that file, but the changes don't "stick".
You're talking about the settings files in
"New Old Stock" knob-less Transporters are going for $500 on eBay with
shipping. So long as your files top out at 24/96, it's as good as it
gets.
Apesbrain's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=738
kjetinho wrote:
> Is the InguzEq still working on the latest versions of LMS? Mine has
> stopped working.
I'm running 7.9.4 on Windows and pretty sure Inguz EQ is still working.
Apesbrain's Profile:
JPatten wrote:
> Thanks for that! I was actually planning to use the USB output rather
> than coax. Is there any reason why not too?
Saw that and deleted my comment re coax before your reply. Either
should work fine.
Shouldn't be a problem. You'll need to install the "Enhanced Digital
Output" applet on the Touch and also the "DSDPlayer" plugin on LMS if
you plan to play DSD. The LMS/Touch/Hugo combo will handle up to 24/192
which includes DSD64 via DoP.
Your DAC is on this list:
If possible, which config file do I edit to change the EQ center
frequencies? Thanks.
Apesbrain's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=738
View this thread:
For the moment, also working on Internet Explorer 11 on Windows 10.
[image: https://i.imgur.com/jZXaO68.jpg]
[image: https://i.imgur.com/ie0JN3h.jpg]
Apesbrain's Profile:
Gain can be adjusted here:
C:\Program
Files\Squeezebox\server\Bin\MSWin32-x86-multi-thread\InguzDSP.exe.config
Apesbrain's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=738
View this thread:
firedog wrote:
> I do have Silverlight installed on the LMS server. What's missing?
>
> Plus: How do I add my RC convolution filters? If I go to my Touch
> interface to Extras>EQ>DRC the only option that appears in "none".
>
> Thanks
The Silverlight thing is very unpredictable. I don't
Interesting finding: Since updating my PC from Win 7 to Win 10, I can
now see and control Inguz settings in Internet Explorer (11.535.18362.0
x64).
Apesbrain's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=738
[image: https://i.imgur.com/YBieBne.jpg]
Apesbrain's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=738
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=72018
Ok man, relax. As @garym said, we don't take kindly to unsubstantiated
claims around here. Each of us is different in what we perceive to be
the "best". I'm glad you're happy with the solution you've found.
Apesbrain's
Wow, it's been a while. Where's @soundcheck when you need him?
Apesbrain's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=738
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=110310
toolapcblack wrote:
> 02 Joggler still the best non phone/tablet way of controlling
> Transporter? I only have an old phone and no home wifi.
>
> is there any other bluetooth or remote control option (non wifi way) of
> controlling it with a screen on said device
I don't think the Joggler will
JohnB wrote:
> Well, I've confirmed your findings.
Thanks for trying it yourself. I solved the problem the "brute force"
way: converted all my one-channel FLAC to "dual-mono" 2-channel. The
files are no larger so I guess FLAC must record this using a flag rather
than storing two identical
Have been using Inguz for a few days now and have discovered that mono
(one-channel) tracks play back greatly reduced in volume. If I convert
these tracks to "dual-mono", i.e. two-channels both the same, then
normal volume is restored. Any idea on how to get around this, or is it
just part of
Silverlight is installed and enabled. I found easiest way to adjust
settings is to edit the target player's config file.
Apesbrain's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=738
View this thread:
Thanks again for your help. Between your replies and calmly reading the
manual, I have a better understanding of what's going on. I've set the
Gain to -10dB and that seems a good balance between the volume being too
low in my system and seeing excessive clipping. The Silverlight problem
may
I'm not sure, but I think it's working now. I've immediate interest in
the Balance and Width functions. I may use the DRC feature in the
future. Is there a way to confirm this processing is enabled? A log or
configuration file that shows the SoX commands being applied?
The range of balance control available to me is +/- 0.4dB. How can I
make that wider? Thanks.
Apesbrain's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=738
View this thread:
Some interesting, if pricey, "plug & play" options:
https://www.audiophonics.fr/en/network-audio-players-rasptouch-c-6350.html
Non-"touch":
https://www.audiophonics.fr/en/network-audio-players-raspdac-c-6314.html
DJanGo wrote:
> we all need this its cheap - only 4165 and 2 2 Meter Cables are
> already included ;-)
And there are four reviewers lined up to tell you how it's worth every
cent.
Apesbrain's Profile:
I'm sorry, after the "Windows Audiophile Edition" thread I guess we're
all out of gas for this one.
Apesbrain's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=738
View this thread:
ralphpnj wrote:
> It's threads like this that make me really miss arnyk. In other words,
> it appears that it's now safe to drink the kool-aid.
It may or may not be safe, but there's no dearth of people willing to do
so.
markolino1972 wrote:
> Obviously in mid-fi equipement you will not hear any difference!
markolino1972 wrote:
>
> i suggest you to read about jitter (this can affect digital cables as
> well)
Dismissing my equipment, ears, and intelligence. The first refuge of an
audiophile "believer". I
This being a Squeezebox forum I assume you are running LMS on your
Windows server and streaming to Squeezebox clients. That said, any
difference you hear in sound quality after an OS update is imaginary.
It falls into the same category as "WAV vs. FLAC" or decoding FLAC on
the server vs. at the
If you've seen the inside of the NAD, you'd know it's more than a RPi in
a box. What they were thinking offering -any- gear at that price point
is beyond me, but it seems they know that now.
The Bryston BDP-Pi is another matter, but at least they don't try to
conceal it!
[image:
Just chiming in to say that I use a Benz ACE (0.8 mV; first gen model)
and like it very much. I've owned many cartridges including an
Audio-Technica AT-14Sa. If I needed a new cartridge, I'm sure I could
live happily with one of the current A-T line such as the VM-740ML. My
memory is of a nice
ralphpnj wrote:
> After reading the above I was left speechless and laughing hysterically.
> For that I feel that my subscription to Stereophile is well worth the $1
> per issue price.
Barely, just read it next time you visit Barnes & Noble. Imagine how
betrayed all those people who went out
If you really want a Transporter, at $499 it's not a bad deal. The knob
part was discontinued so that's why those versions sell for so much
more. If you primarily control your SB player via the remote, or via
PC/app, the knob is not necessary. In any case, it's not worth $500
more!
Meanwhile, over at -ComputerAudiophile- there's a 59-page thread on
choosing the best linear power supply for your DAC.
Thanks, Archimago; keep up the good fight!
Apesbrain's Profile:
Agent Smith wrote:
> Repeat Test 2 for "Disturbed - Overburdened" 96/24 and "Disturbed - Land
> Of Confusion" 96/24.
If you're playing through a SB3/Classic, be aware it maxes out at
24/48.
Agent Smith wrote:
> Don't assume that just because a recording is HD that uses a good
> master. We
drmatt wrote:
> You mean Shazam? I believe Amazon Alexa and apple siri can both do this
> too.
None of those interface with Squeezebox or with any compatible
alternative.
Apesbrain's Profile:
It would be great to have an easier way to find things. Sometimes I can
remember a theme from a classical piece but can't put my mind to the
work or composer. How about just hum or whistle what I remember into a
controller app and it pops up the piece I'm seeking? Or be able to say
"Beethoven
pablolie wrote:
> Room correction. I have experimented with it. Not yet sold on existing
> solutions. Call me old fashioned. Maybe I lucked out with my current
> room. But I am sure it'll get there and make a huge difference.
mlsstl wrote:
> I've tried digital room correction and it didn't
Some other ideas:
https://www.google.com/search?client=ms-android-hms-tmobile-us=android-browser=transporter+digital+input+plugin=1=X=0ahUKEwi3z8udmvDRAhVi9IMKHVtXBOYQvwUIFygA=320=404
Maybe try the one about deactivating the digital inputs plugin then
reactivating it again.
Hi Archimago, my newest Pi is a Model 1 B+ so I guess I already have the
CRAAP configuration. Thanks.
Apesbrain's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=738
View this thread:
pablolie wrote:
> When even Intel declares Moore's Law in hiatus, you know semiconductor
> advances have slowed a fair amount when it comes to some design
> parameters - but not all of them.
Note that we don't talk about CPU speed anymore. Intel nixed that years
ago.
pablolie wrote:
> I
mlsstl wrote:
> (P.S., If you're trying to raise your blood pressure, you'll probably
> get even better results over at hydrogenaud.io...)
NO... Don't do that! I fear the universe will implode.
Apesbrain's Profile:
d6jg wrote:
> Rank
>
> + Gravy with Salt & Vinegar
> + Curry Sauce
> + Salt & Vinegar on its own
I didn't get until just right now (and seeing the post above) that you
were also talking about "chips". Oh, you wacky Brits!
http://www.bbcamerica.com/anglophenia/2013/04/british-crisps
bernt wrote:
> Does the beer taste better if it come from a beer fridge than from a
> standard fridge?
That depends. If you can reach inside the fridge without leaving your
listening chair then hell yes it sounds better. You need to be wary of
introducing noise into your system. A
^ Digital audio has been a windfall for fringe vendors. Data goes in and
music comes out. It's magic, right? All that esoteric stuff like chips,
filters, power supplies, oh my! Best to trust the designer with the
highest pedigree and the most overpriced gear.
Wow, $70 a foot! I recently paid $150 for 1000 feet of quality CAT6.
Apesbrain's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=738
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=106593
arnyk wrote:
> Why don't you take your OT posts to a forum that appreciate them, such
> as...
Exactly. Part of being a responsible adult is to be aware of your
surroundings. This is a forum the spirit of which is to help people with
the practical implementation of a Squeezebox/LMS music
edwardthern wrote:
>
> You guys obviously and not Audiophiles like me:p I think that's the
> first major problem.
Please stop posting this nonsense. It is not welcome here.
Apesbrain's Profile:
d6jg wrote:
> You are taking my question literally - and I thank you for the answer -
> but the question is not intended literally.
OK, you got me!
Apesbrain's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=738
Not sure if I'm addressing your question but I've noticed when I
attenuate the space between tracks on a digitized LP it sounds too
"black". I usually just do a brief fade in the half-second before the
next track.
Julf wrote:
> Part of it is science denial, part of it is the rather popular
> egocentric/relativist "my opinion is as valuable as anyone else's - who
> needs experts" syndrome.
Dirty Harry said it best:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D2_AiQLCb3U
edwardthern wrote:
> Not picking on anyone in particular but I see a bit of hypocrisy going
> on.
We're only human...
edwardthern wrote:
> Audiophiles claim X,Y,Z and non-Audiophiles call them out on it in Lynch
> mob fashion. Although the non-Audiophiles have their own VooDoo magic
>
FWIW, Receiver is limited to 24/48:
http://wiki.slimdevices.com/index.php/Squeezebox_Receiver
OTOH, Squeezelite can handle all the "audiophile" formats.
Apesbrain's Profile:
edwardthern wrote:
> Why battery powered?
So I can wheel it out into the backyard.
Apesbrain's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=738
View this thread:
Mnyb wrote:
> I've read that the older pi have really terrible analog out ?
I have a big, battery-powered, portable speaker running off the analog
output of an original RPi/piCorePlayer and it sounds fine.
Apesbrain's
Smart Gain has always worked well for me. How are you applying
ReplayGain tags to your files?
Apesbrain's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=738
View this thread:
tingtong5 wrote:
> This is why I posted in the Audiophiles subforum :D
I meant nothing personal as I'd have replied in the same way no matter
who posted it. The "Audiophiles" sub is not a safe zone where anything
goes; post a "miraculous discovery" and you should expect to be
challenged.
Yeah, I'm just going to go ahead and call bullshit on this.
Apesbrain's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=738
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=106375
To be fair, I have that Rachmaninoff Piano 3 and it is an exceptional
performance. Byron Janis playing with the London Symphony Orchestra
under Antal Dorati recorded in 1961.
[image: http://i.imgur.com/USlzenG.jpg]
This thread has gotten a bit out there but I want to circle back to the
beginning because I'm a bit confused. Ralphpnj describes a live
orchestral concert recording scenario where he has 65dB of music on top
of 30dB of room noise and asks why anything more than 16-bits is needed
to render that
Summarizing that article, in the reviewer's experience with the
MQA-processed files at hand:
- MQA played on an MQA-enabled DAC sounds "better" than its non-MQA
hi-res equivalent
- MQA played on a non-MQA DAC sounds "better" than its non-MQA
equivalent.
In other words, MQA has the potential to
If "sponsored content" means the reviewer gets to keep the equipment
under review or purchase it at a deep discount, then the hi-end audio
press are pioneers in this area.
Apesbrain's Profile:
garym wrote:
> no one else is making a commercial "replacement" of a TOUCH or
> TRANSPORTER
Just want to mention that there's this:
http://www.vidabox.com/opensqueeze-solo-music-player.html
You'd probably want to add a USB DAC and it's expensive compared to the
DIY Raspberry Pi solution. I
A used Technics is a fine solution but if you want something new the
Audio-Technica 120/240/1240 and Stanton 92/150 meet your requirements.
http://www.needledoctor.com/Online-Store/Stanton-Turntables
http://www.needledoctor.com/Online-Store/Audio-Technica-Turntables
doctor_big wrote:
In 10 years the tube amp will be worth close to its original value,
while the avr will be worth pennies on the dollar.
Isn't that what we were talking about?
Not really, no.
doctor_big wrote:
I simply like the tube sound.
That's cool.
jh901 wrote:
Engineers who actually design audio gear for a living and who have
decades of experience will run circles around Hydrogen worshipers...
This is unwarranted, unsubstantiated, and unwanted over here. If you
can't handle what people have to say at other forums then don't go
there.
I can't speak from first-hand experience but a modestly-priced ($1000)
tube amp that a number of people seem to like is the Decware Super Zen
Triode:
http://www.decware.com/newsite/SE84CKC.html
It's very low power so you'd need to use some high efficiency speakers,
e.g. 92+ dB. Decware makes
Yes, uninstalled/reinstalled as well. There is a reference in this this
thread to an updated Silverlight.js:
http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?87506-Inguz-drc-eq-plugin-workingp=632743viewfull=1#post632743
Would you happen to have this file?
Wirrunna wrote:
I have zipped the silverlight.js mentioned in the post and attached it
as silverlight.zip
Try it and report back.
Thanks for this! I still got the error in IE but as you suggested was
able to access and save settings via my SBRadio display.
Getting the error Cannot initialize Silverlight:
createSilverlightControl is not defined when accessing the Inguz
settings page. Tried IE11, Chrome and Firefox all with same result. Is
there a solution for this? Thanks.
Julf wrote:
Well, coming from Avantgarde, it will probably be be priced at a
reassuringly expensive price point that might add to the credibility
among audiophiles
US$15,000 the pair:
Recent review and some measurements here:
http://www.stereophile.com/content/pono-ponoplayer-portable-music-player
Apesbrain's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=738
View this thread:
Scott Crawford wrote:
Is there any conversion that occurs on the fly that might put a load on
things?
Not sure. Settings Advanced File Types indicates WMA Lossless
is Native. Copy an album or two to your library and try it out.
Scott Crawford wrote:
Next up - and I'm not sure in what order:
Converting my WMA Lossless library to FLAC for use with the LMS library.
Can't hurt but not sure this is necessary. I'm running LMS 7.9 and it
allows my Radios to play WMA Lossless. (Squeezelite, however, does not
seem to like
At one point I swore by all this crap:
[image: http://www.audio-ideas.com/articles/graphics/blacklight.jpg]
[image:
http://store.acousticsounds.com/images/large/S_STOPLITE__12484__06242009023654-693.jpg]
[image: http://i.imgur.com/ri4aUD0.jpg] [image:
I suppose you could use SoX via a custom-convert.conf to attenuate the
left channel. But then again...
rgro wrote:
... in their current position--to my ears---voices, etc.. that are
supposed to be centered do seem to be.
Mnyb wrote:
was it not some crackpot company that sold a belt drive CD player :)
Still around:
http://www.cec-web.co.jp/products/cdplayer/tl0x/tl0x_e.html
Apesbrain's Profile:
Dogberry2, I don't think this is a case of using his name. I love him
but Neil has completely drunk the kool-aid on this one. Witness these
lyrics from Driftin' Back on -Psychedelic Pill- (2012):
-Don't want my mp3
Don't want my mp3
I'm driftin' back
When you hear my song now
You only get
Not to be left out, -The Absolute Sound- this month (Issue #246 -
October 2014) features the next installment in its New Methods for
Quantifying Sonic Performance series. The article includes the
definitive scale of bitrate vs. sound quality. Did you know 24/192
downsampled to 24/48 sounds
bzlrbi wrote:
Whatever. Bye.
These arguments are so predictable but this one was more predictable
than most.
Apesbrain's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=738
View this thread:
Of course this is reasonable. But if you want another viewpoint read
this thread:
http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?101940-24-192-vs-24-96-files-on-Transporter
Use a good converter such as the SoX component on foobar2000. Remember,
reducing wordlength requires dither and if you
RonM wrote:
The easiest thing to do would be to go to 320 mp3s, which I suspect
would have no discernible quality difference from the hi-res originals,
but I'd feel badly doing that.
You might enjoy reading this:
bzlrbi wrote:
I have no problem telling the difference between a 16/44.1 and a 24/96
recording on my home system.
There you go. I now completely understand your concern about
down-rezzing those pristine high-bit files for your lowly Transporter
but the good news is that there's no need: you
Mnyb wrote:
Ah the chief fruit looper is still around/alive
http://pwbelectronics.co.uk Peter W Belt :)
-First time I experienced Belt treatments. Had no clue what Carol was up
to as I was in the other room, though I did know she was playing around
with something audio. She asked me to come in
It's a 20+-year old piece but still I'm surprised Linn would leave you
high and dry. Couldn't they suggest a local authorized repair shop?
Granted I'm cheap, but I'll always try to get something I know I like
fixed before buying something new.
You may hear that you need a more modern DAC
Mnyb wrote:
...and a CD with funny noises you should play in order demagnitise your
hifi .
Yes, the Densen DeMagic. Haven't used it since I moved to Squeezebox
but I think I still have it in my CD drawer:
[image: http://www.mwaudio.de/assets/big/g_densen_demagic.jpg]
'Website'
Mnyb wrote:
Have you ripped it to flac yet , or wait it must probably be wav to work
properly ;)
Then ytou can demagnitise your switch and ethernet cables to
OMG, I hadn't thought of that! I've been looking for something to
restore my wireless signal strength.
Archimago wrote:
Greening the edge of CD's was all the rage around the time I first got
some $$$ to buy audio stuff.
^ This and demagnetizing CDs. I had this device:
[image: http://livedoor.4.blogimg.jp/jazzaudiofan/imgs/0/f/0fe19e82.gif]
ralphpnj wrote:
Sure it's dreck but it's DSD
...and soon DSD128, DSD256 and DSD512 (which is practically
indistinguishable from vinyl, I'm told).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_Stream_Digital#Double-rate_DSD
https://www.theabsolutesound.com/articles/sony-hap-z1es-hdd-audio-player/
Apesbrain's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=738
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=101003
castalla wrote:
Does this app work with the Radio models?
Don't have a UE model to test, but it appears to work with my SB Radio.
Apesbrain's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=738
View this thread:
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
