rkrug wrote:
>
> But it definitely looks fancy
>
> http://www.ultrasound-hifi.com/Us_wh_1/FR/Amplificatori/amplificatori_en.html
>
>
Yes it does. But in a 1980 - The Martian Chronicles kind of way...
20012
+---+
|Filename: M
Mnyb writes:
> For your buggy whip needs .
>
> http://www.cheshirehorse.com/Buggy-Whip-P6374.aspx
>
> only 14.95$
>
> The buggy whip proverb got me thinking the horse hobby is quite popular
> around the world these days , its kind of a luxury not everyone can
> care for or feed a horse , or has
For your buggy whip needs .
http://www.cheshirehorse.com/Buggy-Whip-P6374.aspx
only 14.95$
The buggy whip proverb got me thinking the horse hobby is quite popular
around the world these days , its kind of a luxury not everyone can
care for or feed a horse , or has the time to do that .
And i
mlsstl wrote:
> Long ago I realized I was the weakest link in the reproduction chain.
> That's true of all humans but some of us just refuse to admit it.
>
> My mood, physical state, expectations and subconscious biases all
> dramatically influence my listening perception. If I find fat purple
Further to my comments, this issue was in the bathroom reading queue
today.
Skipped right over the magnetic things.
Now the iFi wallwart. I haven't read it yet, but why bother with a
subjective review? Run some measurements, see if it produces better
results than any other wallwart. Conclude.
mlsstl wrote:
> I think the question would really be: if the audiophile press flatly
> declared that anything other than properly functioning USB cable which
> meets specifications was not only not necessary but a just a waste of
> one's hard earned money, _would_there_be_an_audiophile_press?_
>
ralphpnj wrote:
> Look at this way, if the audiophile press flatly declared that anything
> other than properly functioning USB cable which meets specifications was
> not only not necessary but a just a waste of one's hard earned money
> would there be any audiophile USB cables? I don't think so.
mlsstl wrote:
> Long ago I realized I was the weakest link in the reproduction chain.
> That's true of all humans but some of us just refuse to admit it.
>
> My mood, physical state, expectations and subconscious biases all
> dramatically influence my listening perception. If I find fat purple
Long ago I realized I was the weakest link in the reproduction chain.
That's true of all humans but some of us just refuse to admit it.
My mood, physical state, expectations and subconscious biases all
dramatically influence my listening perception. If I find fat purple
wires with magic connecto
Mnyb wrote:
> The real comedy is that Stereophile fails to draw the obvius conclusiong
> from the measurments vs sigthed testing . The total lack of corelation
> says something .
>
> Simpletons may conclude that "measurments are useless and dont say
> anything" ;)
>
> Think a tiny bit further a
The real comedy is that Stereophile fails to draw the obvius conclusiong
from the measurments vs sigthed testing . The total lack of corelation
says something .
Simpletons may conclude that "measurments are useless and dont say
anything" ;)
Think a tiny bit further and you realize that they have
Archimago wrote:
> Speaking of Stereophile... Check out the historical "As We See It" from
> 1962:
> http://www.stereophile.com/content/weakest-link-3#pY4pXAVBAqOAQywu.97
>
> At least in the history of Stereophile there was J Gordon Holt who had
> his moments... Hmmm. I didn't know dynamic compr
Archimago wrote:
> Speaking of Stereophile... Check out the historical "As We See It" from
> 1962:
> http://www.stereophile.com/content/weakest-link-3#pY4pXAVBAqOAQywu.97
>
> At least in the history of Stereophile there was J Gordon Holt who had
> his moments... Hmmm. I didn't know dynamic compr
Speaking of Stereophile... Check out the historical "As We See It" from
1962:
http://www.stereophile.com/content/weakest-link-3#pY4pXAVBAqOAQywu.97
At least in the history of Stereophile there was J Gordon Holt who had
his moments... Hmmm. I didn't know dynamic compression was an issue in
the 50'
Archimago wrote:
> Good analysis Ralph.
>
> Yeah, this review and check out the magnetic cable one as well in the
> issue. Clearly the reviewer didn't like those crazy cables/adaptors from
> "High Fidelity Cables" and claims but he has to be all nice about it and
> wonder maybe it could work out
Good analysis Ralph.
Yeah, this review and check out the magnetic cable one as well in the
issue. Clearly the reviewer didn't like those crazy cables/adaptors from
"High Fidelity Cables" and claims but he has to be all nice about it and
wonder maybe it could work out for someone else...
Wishy wa
I was disappointed with that review as well. All subjective, no
objective analysis.
They did a much better one on the Antipodes.
riffer's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=13459
View this thread: ht
In the world of high end audio publications Stereophile is usually
considered the "sane" one since they do actually measure most of the
equipment under review and then publish these measurements. To me
Stereophile's use of measurements has always been nothing more than
simple smoke screen used to
18 matches
Mail list logo
