Lin,
We've added some code in Geronimo. Please feel free to jump in to help.
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrevision=494810
The first goal is to port the testsuite\itests\cxfPojoWS test case in
Geronimo to work with Axis2.
thanks,
dims
On 1/4/07, Lin Sun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Hi dims, I just reviewed the patch and I 'll try to help as I can. And I
totally agree with your first goal!:-)
Lin
-Original Message-
From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 8:41 AM
To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Axis2] geronimo
Hi there, Happy New Year! I've been looking at the CXF and Axis1 geronimo
integration code and the earlier post by David Blevins on Axis2 geronimo
integration
(http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-axis-dev/200606.mbox/%3C4457C01
[EMAIL PROTECTED]). I agree with David and think it
makes
Picking up this thread to make sure it doesn't go too far into the
side lines.
Here is some info on how things were implemented in Axis 1. It would
follow the same architecture for Axis2.
The basic layout is:
[Servlet or other front-end]
||
[WebServiceContainer]
Steve Loughran wrote:
Jongjin Choi wrote:
My point is that the JAX-RPC and JAX-WS impl in a Java EE 5 container
should use same SAAJ impl. If not, two implementation of one interface
co-exists and that may cause some problem.
I agree with you. SAAJ is SAAJ but SAAJ impl of Axis 2 is based on
Looking XFire and Celtix binary distribution, I think they use SUN's
SAAJ impl directly.
They does not seem to implement their own SAAJ as we do in Axis1 and Axis2.
On 5/25/06, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Q: Does Axis1 treat its SAAJ impl differently from pure SAAJ?
A: YES.
No
Jongjin Choi wrote:
My point is that the JAX-RPC and JAX-WS impl in a Java EE 5 container
should use same SAAJ impl. If not, two implementation of one interface
co-exists and that may cause some problem.
I agree with you. SAAJ is SAAJ but SAAJ impl of Axis 2 is based on
Axiom. Isn't it?
I think
@ws.apache.org
cc
Subject Re: [Axis2] Geronimo integration?
On May 23, 2006, at 2:57 PM, Rajith Attapattu wrote:
The JonAS guys also asked me the same questions about supporting
both JAX-RPC and JAX-WS.
Looks like their main concern is supporting existing users.
Having
On Wed, 2006-05-24 at 15:50 +0900, Jongjin Choi wrote:
Yes, the JAX-RPC and JAXWS should have common SAAJ impl.
I don't think that JavaEE 5 spec mandate SAAJ 1.2 for JAX-RPC handlers.
They must use common SAAJ 1.3 impl.
The common SAAJ 1.3 impl for Axis 1 / Axis 2 will strike a great blow
to
My point is that the JAX-RPC and JAX-WS impl in a Java EE 5 container
should use same SAAJ impl. If not, two implementation of one interface
co-exists and that may cause some problem.
I agree with you. SAAJ is SAAJ but SAAJ impl of Axis 2 is based on
Axiom. Isn't it?
I think that if Axis1 and
On Wed, 2006-05-24 at 16:52 +0900, Jongjin Choi wrote:
My point is that the JAX-RPC and JAX-WS impl in a Java EE 5 container
should use same SAAJ impl. If not, two implementation of one interface
co-exists and that may cause some problem.
I agree with you. SAAJ is SAAJ but SAAJ impl of Axis
Sanjiva,
Problem that jongjin is referring to is that when you drop our Axis2
saaj impl into Axis1, it will blow up.
-- dims
On 5/24/06, Sanjiva Weerawarana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2006-05-24 at 16:52 +0900, Jongjin Choi wrote:
My point is that the JAX-RPC and JAX-WS impl in a Java
To
axis-dev@ws.apache.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
Subject
Re: [Axis2] Geronimo integration?
Yes, the JAX-RPC and JAXWS should have common SAAJ
impl.
I don't think that JavaEE 5 spec mandate SAAJ 1.2 for JAX-RPC handlers.
They must use common SAAJ 1.3 impl.
The common SAAJ 1.3 impl for Axis 1
On Wed, 2006-05-24 at 08:03 -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Sanjiva,
Problem that jongjin is referring to is that when you drop our Axis2
saaj impl into Axis1, it will blow up.
I'm prolly being thick but why? Drop our Axis2 SAAJ impl into Axis1
must imply that the person dropping it did the
Q: Does Axis1 treat its SAAJ impl differently from pure SAAJ?
A: YES.
No clue about how others are doing it.
-- dims
On 5/24/06, Sanjiva Weerawarana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2006-05-24 at 08:03 -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Sanjiva,
Problem that jongjin is referring to is that
Hi dims, Sanjiva:
Yup - tradeoffs and optimizations. The Axis SAAJ impl presents itself
as normal SAAJ to the rest of the world, but internally we use our
knowledge of Axis-specific APIs in order to get easier code and better
performance. This could change, but we'd need to do a serious
Two different impls in the same classloader is fine. It's two
different versions of the same API that is tricky (well, impossible
really). Typically you just use the latest version of the API and
patch up the old code to implement the right new interface methods --
I usually like to make
On May 23, 2006, at 3:13 PM, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 16:16 -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
We don't want to do rpc/encoded in Axis2, JAX-WS does not mandate it,
however JAX-RPC does need it and explicitly tests for it. So we would
have to do both Axis1 (for JAXRPC) and
The new J2EE spec does not have any JAXRPC...it does have JAX-WS and
SAAJ. So we should be able to write a layer on Axis2 for JAX-WS. There
is a lot of code already in Geronimo for example for JSR 109. which we
can reuse. WSM Project in BeeHive can be used for JSR 181. Question
mark is
David,I would like to get involved with the integration effort. AFAIK this is on the agenda, however we don't have support for JAX-WS yet(ongoing).Soon after the dust settles with the 1.0 release there will be a more concentrated effort with implementing JAX-WS on top of axis2.
Rajithbtw Axis2
Sorry dims didn't see your reply to the thread.RajithOn 5/23/06, Rajith Attapattu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:David,I would like to get involved with the integration effort.
AFAIK this is on the agenda, however we don't have support for JAX-WS yet(ongoing).Soon after the dust settles with the 1.0
to
axis-dev@ws.apache.org
To
axis-dev@ws.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: [Axis2] Geronimo integration?
The new J2EE spec does not have any JAXRPC...it does
have JAX-WS and
SAAJ. So we should be able to write a layer on Axis2 for JAX-WS. There
is a lot of code already in Geronimo for example
- WebSphere Web Services Development
Phone: 512-838-4587 or Tie Line 678-4587
Internet e-mail and Sametime ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
05/23/2006 01:31 PM
Please respond to
axis-dev@ws.apache.org
To axis-dev@ws.apache.org
cc
Subject Re: [Axis2] Geronimo
]
05/23/2006 01:31 PM
Please respond to
axis-dev@ws.apache.org
To
axis-dev@ws.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: [Axis2] Geronimo integration?
The new J2EE spec does not have any JAXRPC...it does have JAX-WS and
SAAJ. So we should be able to write a layer on Axis2 for JAX-WS. There
is a lot of code
On May 23, 2006, at 11:39 AM, Rajith Attapattu wrote:
David,
I would like to get involved with the integration effort.
AFAIK this is on the agenda, however we don't have support for JAX-
WS yet(ongoing).
Soon after the dust settles with the 1.0 release there will be a
more concentrated
to
axis-dev@ws.apache.org
To
axis-dev@ws.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: [Axis2] Geronimo integration?
The new J2EE spec does not have any JAXRPC...it does have JAX-WS and
SAAJ. So we should be able to write a layer on Axis2 for JAX-WS. There
is a lot of code already in Geronimo for example
PROTECTED]
05/23/2006 01:31 PM
Please respond to
axis-dev@ws.apache.org
To
axis-dev@ws.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: [Axis2] Geronimo integration?
The new J2EE spec does not have any JAXRPC...it does have JAX-WS
and
SAAJ. So we should be able to write a layer on Axis2 for JAX-WS
PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 4:17 PM
To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Axis2] Geronimo integration?
We don't want to do rpc/encoded in Axis2, JAX-WS does not mandate it,
however JAX-RPC does need it and explicitly tests for it. So we would
have to do both Axis1 (for JAXRPC
On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 16:16 -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
We don't want to do rpc/encoded in Axis2, JAX-WS does not mandate it,
however JAX-RPC does need it and explicitly tests for it. So we would
have to do both Axis1 (for JAXRPC) and Axis2 simultaneously.
We actually have support for most
PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 4:17 PM
To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Axis2] Geronimo integration?
We don't want to do rpc/encoded in Axis2, JAX-WS does not mandate it,
however JAX-RPC does need it and explicitly tests for it. So we would
have to do both Axis1 (for JAXRPC) and Axis2
-dev@ws.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: [Axis2] Geronimo integration?
On May 23, 2006, at 2:57 PM, Rajith Attapattu wrote:
The JonAS guys also asked me the same questions about supporting
both JAX-RPC and JAX-WS.
Looks like their main concern is supporting existing users.
Having Axis1
/23/2006 05:20 PM
Please respond to
axis-dev
To
axis-dev@ws.apache.org
cc
Subject Re: [Axis2] Geronimo integration?
On May 23, 2006, at 2:57 PM, Rajith Attapattu wrote:
The JonAS guys also asked me the same questions about supporting
both JAX-RPC and JAX-WS.
Looks like
32 matches
Mail list logo
